TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ashpatil Archive

View 175 posts and 189 comments by ashpatil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
59

ashpatil/r/MensRights01/05/10 11:59 PM
59

ashpatil/r/MensRights19/06/10 08:41 AM
44

ashpatil/r/MensRights13/07/10 10:10 AM
44

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/05/10 09:47 AM
43

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/05/10 05:34 AM
34

ashpatil/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:16 AM
33

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/04/11 12:57 AM
28

ashpatil/r/MensRights01/04/10 01:29 AM
27

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/06/10 12:02 PM
27

ashpatil/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:13 AM
25

ashpatil/r/MensRights27/06/10 12:17 AM
23

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:13 PM
23

ashpatil/r/MensRights13/05/10 02:02 PM
22

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/04/10 11:15 PM
21

ashpatil/r/MensRights25/05/10 08:33 AM
21

ashpatil/r/MensRights13/11/10 10:33 AM
21

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/07/10 03:15 AM
20

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/06/10 11:15 AM
19

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/04/10 07:06 AM
19

ashpatil/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:02 PM
17

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/05/10 11:58 PM
16

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/06/10 11:24 AM
16

ashpatil/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:23 AM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/09/10 07:53 AM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/04/11 12:03 AM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/04/10 11:38 AM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:28 PM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights17/04/10 03:25 PM
14

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/07/10 01:26 AM
13

ashpatil/r/MensRights06/05/10 09:32 PM
13

ashpatil/r/MensRights11/09/10 09:50 AM
13

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/05/10 09:33 AM
13

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:39 PM
12

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/07/10 07:51 AM
12

ashpatil/r/MensRights13/07/10 02:57 AM
12

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/04/10 01:20 PM
12

ashpatil/r/MensRights15/05/10 02:43 PM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/07/10 02:55 PM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:16 PM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/12/10 11:44 AM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:15 PM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/05/10 05:52 PM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/04/10 09:48 AM
11

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/07/10 09:33 AM
10

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/04/10 11:56 AM
10

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/09/10 03:36 AM
10

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/04/10 02:42 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/06/10 08:56 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:16 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/06/10 08:48 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/03/11 11:38 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/04/10 07:20 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights03/09/10 11:23 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:15 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/10/10 11:28 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights10/05/10 12:07 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights17/04/10 07:02 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/05/10 08:49 AM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:09 PM
9

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/06/10 12:14 PM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/10/10 11:46 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights22/05/10 01:12 PM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/05/10 11:02 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:07 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/06/10 08:45 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:21 PM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/04/10 07:23 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/08/10 03:35 PM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/11/11 02:08 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/11/10 03:57 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/04/10 08:28 AM
8

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/08/10 09:57 AM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/04/10 03:03 AM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/06/10 12:21 PM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights19/03/11 10:06 AM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:04 PM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/04/10 01:46 AM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/05/10 08:54 AM
7

ashpatil/r/MensRights19/04/10 09:34 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights06/05/10 09:30 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:25 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/09/10 02:44 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/05/10 02:57 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/05/10 07:13 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:05 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/07/10 09:43 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/04/10 10:56 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/07/10 02:47 AM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/09/10 01:37 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/05/10 12:26 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights28/05/10 11:44 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights17/06/10 01:36 PM
6

ashpatil/r/MensRights26/09/10 05:30 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights17/07/10 07:42 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights15/06/10 11:01 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights11/11/10 03:13 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/04/10 01:40 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/08/10 03:47 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/01/11 12:10 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/07/10 03:06 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/06/10 11:28 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights27/11/10 11:45 PM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:49 PM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:08 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights31/03/10 10:19 PM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:53 AM
5

ashpatil/r/MensRights20/04/10 03:20 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:11 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/05/10 11:16 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:53 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights02/10/10 12:51 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights01/10/10 12:58 PM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:57 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/07/10 06:58 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights16/12/10 05:39 AM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:38 PM
4

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/12/10 01:09 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/05/10 02:09 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights10/06/10 09:28 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:05 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/12/10 10:34 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights06/04/10 02:35 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights21/01/11 10:40 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights27/11/10 02:06 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/07/10 09:32 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:13 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/06/10 11:12 PM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/04/11 05:42 AM
3

ashpatil/r/MensRights26/12/10 12:31 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/07/11 01:16 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/12/10 10:27 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/11/10 02:26 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights12/12/10 09:37 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights23/07/11 04:12 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights11/04/10 03:20 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/01/11 05:59 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:39 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights07/04/10 04:45 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:28 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights30/05/10 01:10 PM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/11/10 06:20 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights27/09/10 05:14 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/07/10 01:00 AM
2

ashpatil/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:41 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights01/07/10 11:00 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights15/07/10 09:42 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights21/05/10 02:22 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:52 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights24/06/10 12:47 PM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights29/11/10 11:14 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights11/08/10 01:05 PM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/11/10 12:11 PM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:08 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:17 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights19/08/10 09:39 PM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:34 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights11/01/11 03:46 AM
1

ashpatil/r/MensRights03/01/11 02:22 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights25/05/10 09:48 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights22/11/10 12:00 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights30/12/10 01:56 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights09/12/10 10:17 AM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights30/12/10 11:00 AM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights22/01/11 12:00 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights18/12/10 11:37 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights25/04/10 11:30 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights17/12/10 01:34 AM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights26/11/10 12:37 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights21/04/10 09:35 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights01/04/10 11:28 AM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights20/04/10 03:17 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights21/03/11 11:59 AM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:48 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights08/05/10 06:03 PM
0

ashpatil/r/MensRights04/08/10 10:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

certain members That should read: on certain matters
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:10 AM
1

pissed about not getting in the sidebar Guys, you seem to be creating a conflict where there is none. And from what I know, nobody is pissed at anyone and to report a conflict as a statement of fact is simply unfair and mis-leading. If you don't like posts from supporters of F4E then you are of course free to do whatever you wish, but keep the malicious public vitriol to a minimum because it simply hurts our common cause. If you need to correspond privately on matters, then you are always welcom…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:09 AM
-1

For all non-Australians, Australia's current Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, quite possibly the most unpopular Prime Minister in Australia's history, has recently scraped the bucket in opportunist tactics to appeal to more Australians, by claiming that anyone who attacks her policies is a Misogynist. The great irony is that she made this absurd claim in support of a member of Parliament (whose vote she relied on), who lost his position as Speaker of the House because of Sexist comments he made ab…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:30 AM
3

The really troubling implication of the showdown in parliament this week is that the Prime Minister will now misrepresent any criticisms of her performance and the performance of her government as examples of sexism and misogyny. She will play this card, even if it is the lowest trick in the book, constantly portraying herself as a helpless victim.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:18 AM
1

A link is provided to the original article. The blog article is also catalogued for future reference and research purposes by other interested advocates. Given that all major news sites in Australia will soon be sitting behind a pay wall, there will be many fathers who will not have access to this information but for sites like F4E.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:55 AM
1

Justice Susan Crennan had misled her own de facto husband into believing that their two children were fathered by him, but refused to step down from the High Court hearing of the Magill paternity fraud case, despite the undeniable Conflict of Interest given her own personal history.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 02:08 AM
1

interesting new subreddit. Very different from mens rights
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:12 AM
2

Dedicated to the pursuit of equity in family law matters, and the progressive ideal that children need their father too, and that a presumption of Shared Parenting in the event of separation is in the child's best interests.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:18 AM
1

Looking for aussies to start logging all articles about the anti-father family law changes soon to be voted on in Parliament. Would like to monitor all articles via the fathers4equality subreddit, in order to respond to the articles more comprehensively.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:59 AM
1

I am seeking enlightenment on something that has really troubled the men's rights movement. Our group in Australia (Fathers4Equality) have been asking our newsletter subscribers (about 10,000 of them) if they would be willing to protest against new anti-father laws coming into effect in Australia soon. We got almost 4000 email saying in a word, yes. Then we asked for people to actually register for a rally at our capital city, on a pre-determined day. After 2 weeks and 3 reminder emails, we only…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:48 AM
1

Let me be clear about this: in the eyes of the court, all men are considered to be potential abusers.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 01:16 AM
1

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has got a serious problem with Australian men. So much so that she is soon about to pass the most malicious anti-male laws this country has ever seen, which will effectively presume that all separated men are Wife Abusers or Child Sexual Predators, that is an effective presumption of Guilt against separated fathers. This bill will rely on the subjective thoughts of the alleged victim to determine guilt or innocence, not on objective or conclusive facts.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 04:13 PM
1

Fantastic article and so well reasoned
/r/MensRights14/07/11 03:07 AM
1

Sad day for Australian children. This is the most remarkable legislation given that separated fathers will be presumed to be violent unless their ex-wife disputes this.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 04:38 AM
1

However in an era when women are tearing down every pre-conceived notion of femininity, even against that last bastion of masculinity, the military, shouldn’t we finally reject this pretence of moral outrage against shared parenting, and call it for what it is? Nothing more than the dying shrill of the femi-garchs, a small, out-dated, non-representative self-interest group who are fighting the masses in order to hold on to their ill-gotten power.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 05:43 AM
1

Regardless of the facts, men continue to be overlooked, because this is an ideology, not an event based on evidence.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 12:04 AM
-1

Intersting commentary which probably has important family law implications if feminists ever decided to take the blinders off.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 12:57 AM
1

Finally, a jail term similar to what a male would have received.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:39 PM
1

Notice how this womans sexual abuse of six 11 year old boys is explained away as not a crime, just sexual gratification.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 12:00 PM
2

Finally a common sense judgment from the British Courts.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 10:06 AM
2

Notice how regrettable this decision was for the judge? Why one may ask when the mother was so violent?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 11:39 AM
2

Probably the most progressive law in 50 years. I can only imagine the enormous resistance it would have faced from single mothers' groups
/r/MensRights27/02/11 05:11 AM
1

Its amazing what crap some journalists would publish. This article has had its title changed to more honestly reflect the true message behind this story.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 06:00 AM
1

It seems like they kept this father waiting for 4 months just to see his (recaptured) abducted child.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 12:01 PM
1

Mate, I am not trying to offend anyone. Just trying to get some support. For those of you who may volunteer your time to help divorcing dads, one thing you learn quick smart is that once the court case is over, you never hear from that dad again, even when you ask for them to support the next dad that comes along. Sometimes it makes me think that men are their own worst enemies. Anyway simply trying to get some support online, as every little bit helps. No offense intended to anyone.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 11:46 AM
1

Mate, I am not trying to offend anyone. Just trying to get some support. For those of you who may volunteer your time to help divorcing dads, one thing you learn quick smart is that once the court case is over, you never hear from that dad again, even when you ask for them to support the next dad that comes along. Sometimes it makes me think that men are their own worst enemies. Anyway simply trying to get some support online, as every little bit helps. No offense intended to anyone.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 11:46 AM
1

If you care about fathers rights in Australia, subscribe to the Twitter account and keep in touch with daily developments.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 10:41 AM
1

This news item should more appropriately be titled: “Mother makes false allegations and creates Parental Alienation to prevent child from having a relationship with her father”. Given that this journalist is a CRIME EDITOR, one would think she would detect Perjury when she sees it. This is why we need genuine Shared Parenting laws in Australia.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 03:46 AM
3

How convenient. When services need to be cut, DV is always the sacred cow, but protection for men is the first to go.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 12:11 AM
2

Is this judgment not encouraging more mothers to do the same? Does this Judge not realise that by rewarding Parental Alienation against a loving father, that he is condemning many more kids to be exploited like this? Really stupid, short sited judgment!
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:14 AM
1

This story speaks for itself, however I believe the stats of mother-son incest are much higher than what is claimed here, because the majority of boy victims are too ashamed to 'accuse' their mother, and even if they do, society on the whole simply does not take female on boy sexual assault seriously.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 02:25 PM
1

Hmm, there apparenty is a huge number of children who undergo gender re-assignment that regret it, although this will always be a hard decision for a Court.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 01:57 PM
2

Its coming to a ridiculous point where marriage is worthless and the presumption is that if you are married yyou have a RIGHT to have an affair and maintain your privacy while you are at it.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 11:01 AM
2

...leads me to think that child sexual abuse is just as prevalent amongst women, although almost never reported. So men are stigmatised because society insists on ignoring half the problem.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:54 AM
1

Nice little reality check for some of those who think that recent legal changes in Europe for unmarried fathers amounts to anything.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 12:32 PM
2

Is this not a case of bending over backwards to decrimilize all wrongdoing from women? If men are held accountable for life for getting a woman pregnant, should women simply have the option of dumping a child and leaving?
/r/MensRights18/12/10 11:38 PM
1

Very important story about how gender politics kills children
/r/MensRights17/12/10 01:35 AM
2

To think that this child died because a child protection agency was more concerned about the rights of the mother than the safety of the child. Says a lot about the institutional discrimination against fathers and children, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights16/12/10 05:40 AM
2

So is there anywhere where a father can get a fair trial? In this case the female Prosecutor hid vital evidence that the alleged victim had in fact lied on loath in a previous case where she claimed that she was sexually abused by her neighbour. The Prosecutor knew this evidence, but hid it from the jury. Why so much effort to convict innocent people?
/r/MensRights14/12/10 01:11 PM
1

Are they F*n serious?
/r/MensRights12/12/10 10:28 AM
1

Nice to see these stories being printed in mainstream newspapers for once.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 09:37 AM
1

When men start coming out in droves with this quality of writing, then something great is obviously happening at the grass levels of society.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 10:18 AM
1

Personal experience from the writer fathersdomatter
/r/MensRights08/12/10 10:35 AM
1

Well written review of the current proposed amendments to Australias shared parenting laws
/r/MensRights07/12/10 11:44 AM
1

See, its not simply about changing the law. Its all about those institutions that will hold back change no matter what.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:39 PM
3

So women are rapists too I see!
/r/MensRights29/11/10 11:14 AM
1

One fathers story
/r/MensRights27/11/10 11:45 PM
1

Just think of the possibilities..
/r/MensRights27/11/10 02:06 PM
1

Imagine what could be achieved if men voted in their own best interests for once.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 12:38 PM
2

You gotta fight fire with fire
/r/MensRights24/11/10 06:21 AM
1

Now here's one you probably never came across before. 10 women gang-raping a boy, and possibly giving him AIDS.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 12:00 PM
1

Read these proposed changes carefully. The definition of child abuse is to be redefined to include non-abusive behaviour, even imaginary behaviour. Parental Alienation is to be given the tick of endorsement by this Bill. And lying in Family Court cannot incur any type of penalty. Well, with all these protections in place, I am sure even Mother Mary would be prepared to lie when under pressure. Stupid laws that are clearly not about protecting children.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:56 AM
0

Their research showed them its working well, but they want to dismantle it. Any guesses why?
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:09 AM
1

I feel that an interesting battle is about to happen in Australia on this topic.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 10:34 AM
0

At least cares enough to be doing a PhD on it.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 02:27 PM
1

These changes to the family law act in Australia sound rushed, and there has certainly been no consultation about these changes with mens groups. Just read the recommendations and try and make sense of them. They are basically reducing the need for proof that any abuse has occured, and have even re-defined child abuse to include non-abusing behaviour. These changes are unfortunately not about reducing child abuse, but are aimed at appeasing the women's lobby.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 03:16 AM
1

These changes to the family law act in Australia sound rushed, and there has certainly been no consultation about these changes with mens groups. Just read the recommendations and try and make sense of them. They are basically reducing the need for proof that any abuse has occured, and have even re-defined child abuse to include non-abusing behaviour. These changes are unfortunately not about reducing child abuse, but are aimed at appeasing the women's lobby.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 03:15 AM
2

if this woman succeeds in her Appeal it would be remarkable given the circumstances. This was child murder at its most evil, simply to get back at the father. Now she claims she is not responsible.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 12:12 PM
1

Real life experience from a man in Court
/r/MensRights04/11/10 03:57 AM
1

"...because the domestic violence act could not be used against women."
/r/MensRights23/10/10 11:47 AM
1

Sure, I would be happy to do it this way. A link I already supply but also happy to add commentary as per Glenn Sacks.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:28 PM
3

Like I said, the website gets a trackback and the author and/or editor get a courtesy email. I fully credit the article as much as is possible. If they ask for removal it happens immediately.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:40 AM
6

Kist one more point guys, at the last federal election F4E contributed $4000 to help the Equal Parenting party in their campain. Half of that money came out of my pocket. This coming election in 2 weeks time we have more money available from donations and some adsense money. Not 1 cent has been touched by anyone for any reason. It has been commuted 100% to supporting the equal parenting party, although we will probably never be able to compete with the feminists. So we are doing our best to help…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:04 AM
5

I am on the road so am doing this from my iPhone. Every post is fully credited. The original news sites get a trackback notice and the authors get a courtesy email. Some of the articles are originals with an emphasis on promoting original material. I think in last 24 hours or so there were 3 original pieces. The material on the F4E website has been used in the 1 in 3 campaign in Australia to convince the government to fund domestic violence centers for men. As far as I know, the F4E blog is the …
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:52 AM
1

Is this a reflection of never before explored research, or a changing of attitudes from researchers?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:35 AM
1

Single mother and her boyfriend abusing the kids. This is the underbelly of the sole custody mantra that most western countries have adopted. Up to 80% of familial child abuse occurs in this arrangement, and yet biological fathers are the ongoing targets of anti-child abuse campaigns.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:50 PM
0

I believe that men's groups are more balanced and open minded than feminist groups, which is why posts like this survive on MensRights, whereas they would be voted down immediately on Feminisms.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:26 AM
1

Just to highlight the point that no gender has a mandate on child abuse. Both men and women do it for substantially similar reasons.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 10:11 AM
6

Very good research behind this story.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:03 PM
3

What really disturbs me about this article is the complicity of the whole neighborhood. Again one standard for men and another for women.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:14 PM
5

A real case study of how the anonymity of a rape accuser can work against justice.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 09:43 PM
1

Makes you wonder whether the tail is wagging the dog
/r/MensRights24/07/10 06:58 AM
4

The father was in a coma for weeks, but that didn't prevent the Inland Revenue from continuing to charge him for his child support obligation and to accrue arrearages.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 02:47 AM
1

What was the racist and sexist part of this mentioned at the end? This story is a first for me. Links would be nice. The Racist part: The child was part aboriginal. The mother was white. The mother resented the fact that the child turned out "black." She made numerous racist comments about the child to Child Protection authorities, amongst her threats to kill the child. The Sexist part: The state government ran an agenda that the child should be with his mother, for gender-political grounds. The…
/r/MensRights18/07/10 03:21 AM
7

It seems that no one but mens groups are acknowledging this phenomenon. Why.....why is there such resistance to acknowledging that men too are abused?
/r/MensRights18/07/10 03:16 AM
1

Did anyone read the article? Maybe take a minute to read and then make an informed comment. Otherwise keep your disgusting language off this site.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 08:06 AM
-1

Julia Gillard, Australia’s new Prime Minister is not just a treacherous back-stabber, but she is a a male-hating feminist to boot.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 07:42 AM
5

The saga of this case continues. The Department of Child Protection forced this child to live with his mother, despite the mother repeatedly threatening to kill the child. The Department later admitted that their support for the mother was based solely on her gender. It seems the NSW government has not learned its lesson.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 07:52 AM
3

This article sounds very apologetic on the part of the mother, almost excusing her behaviour. I can only imagine the damage done to the vulnerable child.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 09:43 AM
2

One small step for one man, but I suspect the policy goes on...
/r/MensRights13/07/10 02:57 AM
2

Really important guidelines for fathers to follow in the Family Court, given that there is still an overwhelming presumption that children should not have an independant relationship with their fathers post-divorce, despite the laws being substantially changed 4 years ago.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 03:08 AM
1

Whenever someone is promoting significant change to the status quo, then the burden of proof us on them. In any case I don't think the issue is parenting skills. I think it is stigma. If a society still holds a stigma against gays, then rightly or wrongly this will affect the children. So why expose children to unecessary psychological distress?
/r/MensRights11/07/10 05:19 AM
2

I'd like to know exactly what Ms Holborow meant when she said: "the notion that 'mother's milk is best' was entrenched in the family law system. " Is she suggesting that children naturally belong only with their mother's, not their father's, after separation?
/r/MensRights09/07/10 02:57 PM
2

When a father killed a child a few years back during a child custody dispute, the government set up an inquiry to attempt to repeal the shared parenting laws (even though issue had nothing to do with shared parenting laws). ..so how will they twist the facts in this terrible, terribe case?
/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:17 AM
1

In Australia, the name Adele Horin means paid advocate. It certainly doesn't mean journalist.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:08 AM
1

A lot of rumours that this is a bogus study. Despite was the headline suggests, this is another transparent effort from women's group to reverse Australia's shared parenting laws, to the detriment of children.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 09:33 PM
5

Genuine science showing the incidents of abuse against men. I happen to think that it is probably the most under-reported crime in Australia, given the huge stigma attached to it, and the almost non-existent services available to help such men.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 01:28 AM
2

A real sham as far as reports go, but true to form this seriously flawed report was run in a mainstream broadsheet newspaper in Australia. This response highlights why this report is so flawed.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 01:01 AM
1

Family law changes seem to be proposed in a lot of countries. Germany was one I was not expecting, although Singapore, UK, Canada just to name a few have been talking a lot about needed changes.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:10 PM
4

So how is it that psychological abuse is predominantly done by males to females? Where's the proof? Just because men do not report abuse to the same extent as women doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 09:34 AM
1

This study suggests that there is an inbuilt, hard-coded connection between biological father and child, in line with what is believed to be the case for biological mothers. This study is important, because if accepted, it could have far reaching implications in family law and even abortion.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 11:02 AM
1

bugsydash, I think it has been generally accepted in Australia that men have NOT been able to seek remedy from sexual discrimination by way of the sex discrimination act. It has been a gripe for many men's group that the act has acted as a de facto "Women's Discrimination act" in practice. From my understanding, there was too much discretion in the existing act, and whenever men were discriminated against, for example not allowed in health clubs, not allowed in swimming pools, not allowed in dom…
/r/MensRights27/06/10 12:26 PM
2

Never thought I would see the day, especially from this government. These changes could very well come in handy.
/r/MensRights27/06/10 12:18 AM
3

A truly despicable story. I can't tell you how upset I get when I read such dribble.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 12:51 PM
3

Finally an admission from a Minister for Women's Affairs that the domestic violence figures being touted against males are false and misleading.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 11:25 AM
3

This is a really obvious and rare case of false allegation of abuse. This frustrates me because there is no such outcry for the far more common false allegation that happens in family courts.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 08:43 AM
1

We have just had a similar programmes in Australia cancelled, once it served it political purpose. I suspect many of these programmes will be short-lived and window dressing.
/r/MensRights18/06/10 11:14 PM
2

Interesting how she doesn't at all consider her husband's right to a monogamous relationship.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 01:36 PM
1

Its not fraud according to the High Court of Australia.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:55 AM
2

This sounds very similar to the Liam Magill case in Australia, where the High Court found that there was no proof that the mother knowingly deceived the father into believing that he was the real father. Another interesting aside about the Liam Magill case was that one of the presiding Judges (a woman) had also previously mislead her partner into thinking their two kids were his. But did she step aside because of conflict of interest? No way. Similarly, I would be really suprised if the UK allow…
/r/MensRights16/06/10 12:18 PM
2

For those of you who think it is simply an affliction for Western countries, think again. You would be suprised at how discriminated fathers are in India. It is systemic and sometimes I think it is even worse than western countries.
/r/MensRights15/06/10 11:02 AM
1

Very interesting dissection between the development of International Women's Day, and that of International men's Day.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 12:22 PM
1

This is an interesting story. I am in Sydney and only read about this on Reddit. No mention of it on the TV News at all, as far as I know. I like most of you would like to know more about what set him off, but I am certain that if it were a family court matter, the privacy provisions would mean that no details can be released.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 04:13 AM
3

Wow, so she deliberately dumds down the child to demand mote money. Why have they not taken the child off her?
/r/MensRights11/06/10 07:52 AM
2

I hear that a major newspaper was going to run this story after months of investigation, but it was pulled at the last minute. Interference maybe?
/r/MensRights10/06/10 09:29 AM
3

I'd like to know if these articles are simply preaching to the converted, or if any of it is getting out to the mindset of mainstream community. If not, its all just a waste of time.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 12:03 PM
5

No doubt the feminists will claim that the increase in violence is because of oncreased dscrimination against women. The point however, that we are equal and the same, will be ignored.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 11:17 AM
2

Study showing alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993).
/r/MensRights08/06/10 08:58 PM
1

New word we should be emphasising, ladette, becoming more and more common in the news. So is this real or just a media beat up?
/r/MensRights08/06/10 11:29 AM
1

You have to get passed the Facebook issue to get the meaning of this one, but it sems that based on this study, family bonds are the weakest in single mother households, stronger in single father households, and strongest in shared parenting households.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 08:50 AM
1

This kid was lucky that his parents found and paid for an investigator to prove his innocense. The obvious question is how many men are not so lucky. With the standard of proof so low on sexual abuse allegations, and with a presumption of guilt adopted by the courts, it doesn't take much for someone to be locked up based on a mere allegation these days, so I suspect it happens a lot more than we care to think.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 08:47 AM
1

Well, its clear that this is no longer a minor abberation. This is a clear trend, and who knows how far it will go. Will female violence exceed male violence. I think so, because underlying all the shock and suprise news articles is an acceptance that its not as bad as male violence.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 12:28 PM
12

Wow, this is a remaarkable story. However, it does show the implications to our kids of these bizarre anti-father Family Court decisions. I would imagine the same issue occurs with paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 09:48 AM
2

I believe this article seriously under-estimates the extent of domestic abuse by women against men. I tend to think that its the most under-reported crime in Australia.
/r/MensRights30/05/10 01:11 PM
5

Just goes to show that anyone can be a victim of domestic violence, but I'd like to know a bit more about how he hapenned to fall before I decide as to whether it was related to any domestic violence incident. It does sound plausible though.
/r/MensRights30/05/10 12:01 AM
2

This is an interesting counter to the almost weekly news reports we get in Australia of this or that Sports star sexually abusing women. This article highlights that women too participate in this kind of behaviour.
/r/MensRights29/05/10 08:51 AM
1

This one >> "I came up with a few (the Australian father whose daughters were placed with their mother despite having proven he did not abuse them and the court's admission that he is batshit crazy"
/r/MensRights29/05/10 07:07 AM
2

Well written response to an article that completely and fraudulently misrepresents the nature and conclusions of the study
/r/MensRights28/05/10 11:44 PM
1

Can you provide a reference to the case you referred to?
/r/MensRights27/05/10 10:23 PM
2

If from Australia, look at www.f4e.com.au
/r/MensRights27/05/10 10:19 PM
1

Raising Awareness About Equal Shared Parenting Family Law Reform by Attempting to Break the Guinness World Record for the Fastest Crossing of Canada on Foot (72 Days)
/r/MensRights25/05/10 09:49 PM
5

This story should be front page news across the world, and yet I was lucky to even come across it. Was it widely reported in UK?
/r/MensRights25/05/10 08:33 AM
0

Conservative
/r/MensRights24/05/10 04:00 PM
0

There reports are becoming more and more common, but still ignored by the mainstream.
/r/MensRights23/05/10 11:26 AM
0

It seems that the westernised ideology of false allegations in family court has crossed the cultural barrier.
/r/MensRights23/05/10 07:14 AM
2

Probably the most under-reported crime in the western world, in part because society doesn't care, and also because men fear how society would view them if they did complain. The virtue of men suffering in silence has really worked against men in the area of domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights22/05/10 01:15 PM
1

Reminds me of the climate change debate. Scientists and researchers seem to have lost all their objectivity these days.
/r/MensRights21/05/10 11:53 PM
0

Interesting perspective on how fathers are treated in the west by an outsider.
/r/MensRights21/05/10 02:22 AM
0

What does that have to do with Mens Rights?EVERYTHING! I am sure in your country, just like in mine, there are multi-million dollar campaigns to protect woman AND children from men. This stereotype of men is used everywhere to suggest that men are all naturally violent, and women are not. In fact it is suggested that women are the only gender capable of protecting children. Articles like these show that both men and women can be child abusers, and both men and women can be good parents. It's sim…
/r/MensRights20/05/10 03:56 AM
2

How often do we need to read these stories before we accept that women are just as much a threat to children as men?
/r/MensRights18/05/10 11:03 AM
0

When will the mainstream media catch on?
/r/MensRights15/05/10 02:43 PM
2

The report he refers to is a document sterreotyping all males and violent and all women as victims, and resisting shared parenting laws because of the asssertion that men allone cannot parent a child.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 09:34 AM
1

Shared Parenting bills seem to be popping up all over the US and Canada.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 08:55 AM
1

hapenning all over western world
/r/MensRights13/05/10 02:02 PM
1

Either highlighting progress in gender equality in Australia, or another desperate and doubtful promise by a government on the nose
/r/MensRights10/05/10 12:09 PM
4

My question: Would the case have been dropped if the parent was the girl's father? I am sure the answer is "No".
/r/MensRights08/05/10 06:04 PM
1

They don't explain why he has to pay child support, except so that his ex doesn't lose her house. But his ex is married, can work for herself, and does not look after the child because she had previously abused the child, so I just don't understand. Maybe its just an "only in California" thing.
/r/MensRights08/05/10 05:54 PM
2

It seems the UK genuinely does not want transparency in family law matters, as its changes were set o fail from the get go.
/r/MensRights06/05/10 09:32 PM
1

I just don't see her going to court over this, as it is almost treated like a parody, but if the perpetrator was the husband the tone would have been much mor serious.
/r/MensRights06/05/10 09:31 PM
1

Another story highighting the importance of fathers to young children.
/r/MensRights04/05/10 02:09 PM
1

Wow, so its final, men are never the victims of famiy violence or abuse.
/r/MensRights04/05/10 02:58 AM
3

What is the source from Yahoo questions? What is that? BTW, if you look up Barbara Biggs you will find some videos on Youtube she produced. If you this this blog is crazy then you should view these videos. Apparenty any father who gets custody of his child is really a child abuser in sheeps clothing. But no, I don't know anything more about this blogger.
/r/MensRights02/05/10 09:27 AM
12

This is a blog post from a mother who was accused of fabricating allegations against her ex-husband of child sexual abuse. Take special note who she is seeking comfort from and how she justifies her allegations. Read the whole bizarre blog. It is a real eye-opener. Its these kind of women that the Rudd government in Australia want to allow to make false allegations of child sexual abuse, and be safeguarded from any prosecution.
/r/MensRights02/05/10 05:35 AM
7

I think the ratio is 1.5 to 1 overall for health spending on womens diseases to men. This is disproportional to the rate of disease, especially given that men die on average almost 10 years earlier than women. Saus a lot about our priorities as a society.
/r/MensRights02/05/10 12:00 AM
7

There seems to be a few high prifile paternity fraud cases of late. The one in Australia (magill) still has legs dspute the High Court refusing to pay the father back for his child support for kids that were eventually found not to be his. I bet in this case this father gets nothing back, just more heartache and betrayal.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:14 AM
-1

Wow, this is a remarkably vicious attack. So women, just like men, now attack people in groups.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 11:31 PM
2

This new phenomenon of women outdrinking males is also hapenning in Australia.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 07:24 AM
1

These sentiments are becoming more and more vocal these days.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 07:21 AM
0

Wow, the first time that its happened, and its happened to a woman. It looks like women are set to outdue men in the violence and alchohol stakes.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 09:36 PM
1

..
/r/MensRights20/04/10 03:17 PM
1

perhaps this DVD should be distributed in other countries as well, like maybe the US or the UK.
/r/MensRights20/04/10 03:21 AM
1

This applies uniquely to Australia, and shows to what extent Shared Parenting diminshes the need for post-separation parental conflict.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 08:29 AM
2

I don't agree with you catlebrity. To me, the writer is suggesting that ladettes are self destructing because "they'll never live up to the expectations of others, so they deliberately seek to confound and lower those prospects." The writer then contenst that the Commissioner connects the inability to live up to expectations to the glass ceiling created by men in the workforce. If anyone is familiar at all with the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, then you would be aware that this is a common th…
/r/MensRights18/04/10 02:54 AM
2

Wow, men are now even to blame for violent women. What next?
/r/MensRights17/04/10 03:25 PM
6

What more incentive do you need to make a false allegation? And an important question is, will the days off work also apply to men? I think not.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 07:02 AM
-1

..
/r/MensRights16/04/10 02:45 PM
3

More paternity fraud. What stuns me is the response of Kathleen Swinbourne, who states that not being the father is no excuse for not paying child support. She also bames these men for not being the fathers, and seems to ignore the role of these lying mothers who created the problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/04/10 09:49 AM
-1

..
/r/MensRights16/04/10 07:06 AM
3

High profile paternity fraud case
/r/MensRights14/04/10 03:04 AM
12

Very rare for a mother to lose custody, but very common allegations that are made in Court
/r/MensRights12/04/10 11:16 PM
4

Shouldn't feminists be focussing on woman who are genuinely suffering, rather than feathering their own nests?
/r/MensRights12/04/10 01:40 AM
3

I find the below comment quite bizarre, but very representative of what this woman stood for. This woman fought for the rights of single women, above and beyond everything else, including the rights of children. Let's not pretend that she was some kind of hero, as any good that came from her was incidental, rather than her direct aim. To refer to her as a believer in the equality of all people, and within the same sentence define this belief as centering on a woman's right above the rights of ch…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 03:21 PM
3

It seems NZ is pandering to women's group under the guise of helping prevent male suicide.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:05 PM
3

This discrimination is far greater than reported in this article, especially since the shared parenting legislation of 2006
/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:04 PM
1

Yes, I agree windynights. Its as if a hysteria has taken over the industry and they will not let common sense get in the way. I sometimes get the feeling that these group want child abuse to be everywhere, somehow to justify their own sense of armageddon. So if they can't increase the numbers, they can simply extend the definition. Same thing with domestic violence, where even an irational fear of being being abused is now classified as family violence in some Australian states.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 11:06 PM
1

..
/r/MensRights08/04/10 01:20 PM
2

Sole custody, not shared parenting increases risk of child abuse
/r/MensRights08/04/10 01:47 AM
2

This woman has a litany of anti-shared parenting articles in one of Australia's most prominent newspapers.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 04:46 PM
5

Mandano, obviously you don't like to read. The solution has been articulated many times. And no one is stating that women are bad. This may be your own misconception, but it has nothing to do with what is being said. Simply said, women are AS bad as men, but sole custody is the biggest cause of child abuse. Promote shared parenting and there is greater transparency, and hence less opportunity for child abuse.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 09:59 PM
5

http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/equalparenting/fathers4equality.nsf/pages/childabuserisks
/r/MensRights06/04/10 02:43 PM
3

Well worth the effort
/r/MensRights06/04/10 02:35 PM
1

These figures are not a poor reflection of women or mothers. They are a poor reflection of sole parenthood, in terms of the overall welfare of children. There is no perfect solution for these issues, but this provides a solid argument against those women's groups who argue against shared parenting laws because of what they claim are inherent risks to children. This is obviously nothing more than folly, but these figures underline to what extent this argument is nonsense. It is clear that it is s…
/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:53 PM
7

Yes, the figure is the joint "mother abuse + mother's boyfriend abuse." Its about 75% to 80% across most western countries like NZ, USA and UK, as well as Australia. These figures are hard to get because most of these countries group males & fathers together, giving the impression that biological fathers are the biggest abuse group, where in fact biological fathers are the smallest abuse group. And yes, males are over-represented when it comes to sexual abuse of children, but again the biggest g…
/r/MensRights06/04/10 04:58 AM
4

Figure is consistent amongst many western countries, but is rarely reported on
/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:17 AM
1

Has been a figure found consistently across the western world, but rarely reported on
/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:15 AM
2

You can sign it regardless of what country you are from. Has slowed down recently but is getting close to 5000.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:07 AM
1

With such low figures for shared parenting outcomes, you may wonder why the feminists are making such an issue out of it
/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:49 PM
3

Number of people joining this class action is growing at phenomenal rate
/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:22 PM
1

Strange but true
/r/MensRights05/04/10 12:16 PM
4

Despite well funded campaign by feminists to repeal Australia's Shared Parenting laws, Australians still overwhelmingly support these laws.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 10:58 AM
1

There has been a lot of misrepresentation by women's groups about what these laws say. Read this overview to get a rare honest account of Australia's internationally acclaimed Shared Parenting laws.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 11:59 AM
0

Well articulated article. Bizarre how the feminists are the one resisting shared parenting. They should be the biggest supporters.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 11:39 AM
1

Double standards!
/r/MensRights01/04/10 11:28 AM
4

It seems that these groups will come up with any excuse to repeal the shared parenting laws in Australia.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 01:30 AM
5

Maybe this explains why women on the one hand want equality in the home, and then on the other resist shared parenting like their life depended on it.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:40 PM
1

Very well written article.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:30 PM
1

Is this another case of double standards? Just imagine the outcry if the child was sexually abused by the father
/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:15 PM
3

Title says it all really. About time however for documentaries like these.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 10:34 PM
0

Yes, what about all the female cheats, which apparently occur at a higher rate than males?
/r/MensRights31/03/10 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter