TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

asillyduck_ Archive

View 2 posts and 363 comments by asillyduck_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

Considering he is a globalist shill, and highly manipulative, I don't care what they do to him. He has been outted as the guy who set UN narrative for one of their big meets in 2012.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:51 AM
-1

That pretty much counts as agreeing with it.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:19 PM
0

; something to pulled fresh outta my as.; ;been interesting popping back, back to work, then back to ;following through the links ee4m gave me last, most fascinating. ;rockerfella foundation connects to prussian public school program ;connecting it to the dissemination of marxism every where. Still so ;much more to learn. Good day, Sir, Madam, I am a dapper cove, in the employ of one shoppers(? What is this shoppers?) One is presently engaged in the arousal of cognition for fairness and full eng…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 10:13 AM
2

Our rob or ross? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6dD4crUBIA
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:42 AM
1

Thanks for the links https://www.inc-cap.com/ https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-History-Billionaires-Radical/dp/0385535597 Will dig through them, should be illuminating.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:14 AM
0

Yea the social experiment they are referring to looks like an old one. But that is a good point, both that there are few of these 'experiments' and that the BBC is even showing.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:06 AM
1

That's an old one isn't it?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:26 AM
2

This is still the nice phase of the crazy ramping up. Enjoy it. Over the next month its set to get a lot worse. You try telling people.shrugs
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:19 AM
1

Now that is interesting. It pertains to your notion of neoliberal vs liberal. I'm not sure at all as to what you mean as difference between the two. From my view there are BS liberals and true liberals. True liberals are reasonable, modern liberals are agenda 21/2030 adherent. I suspect you and I don't disagree too much on the realities, but we disagree on our word choice, perhaps correctly. Perhaps I need a better education. On the other hand as I am learning lately, I may just need to learn a …
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:24 PM
1

That is the best you have brother? I sincerely hoped you had something more educative than that. Than statements of "this is" "that is". Then outright statements of 'nonsense'. Seems we aren't going to see eye to eye over this. Shame if that is the closest you get to instructive. "Agree with me or you are wrong. " are seldom corrective, forgiving or even as history would depict as correct view points, but those have always been totalitarian and prescriptive. Perhaps you are one of the examples e…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:12 PM
1

So capitalism, is compatible with “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” (Founder of the UN Environment Programme) And any agendas (for example 21 and 2030) that bring that about?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:42 PM
7

This is still only the start of the ramp up of the crazy.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:40 PM
1

ford foundation yes we have reflections of them and the political charities that they fund in the UK too. All countries have them in the west. Funny that they all have the same one world goals. UN agenda 21 https://www.fordfoundation.org/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/habitat-iii-local-governments-are-key-to-achieving-international-development-goals/ UN agenda 2030 https://www.fordfoundation.org/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/strong-partnerships-for-a-sustainable-future-the-legacy-of-the-communi…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:28 PM
5

http://www.fabians.org.uk/the-cultural-divide/ the same trevor phillips there too. On the basis of these statistics, there seems every chance that while the Sikh teenager will one day turn into a highly skilled doctor, the grime-music obsessed African sixth-former will become a pin-striped lawyer, and that mathematics-nut Chinese GCSE student will end up a tech entrepreneur, the best that your average working-class white boy can hope for is a part-time job in an Amazon warehouse. Thing is these …
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:18 PM
1

Yes you do have a point, analogies though don't have to be perfect fits to still be effective at expressing an idea, sometimes it seems they must though.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:07 PM
2

if they had been made about any other social group the comedian would have been crucified/banished/shunned etc. by the media. http://www.onenation.com.au/policies/agenda21 Look up a documentary called Europa The Last Battle. But you have to drop the political correctness, you cannot allow it to dictate what facts you are allowed to know.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:09 AM
1

UN and what they are doing and the way have corrupted so much is not a 'conspiracy'. The evidence is there. Much of it is reported in the press. Main stream. Well unless you think the increasing madness about division between gender and race seems normal to you. With out something driving it, most people of all types seem quite normal, and willing to get along with each other most of the time over most things. It doesn't seem normal or right to me.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:07 AM
4

So her father is fighting things like this? http://www.onenation.com.au/policies/agenda21 Yes, another ally in the fight to stop this world wide divisive insanity that is the biggest driving force behind intersectionality, collectivist guilt, and weird treasonous 'political charities'.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:04 AM
1

What if the Borg chose to make them unable to think outside certain lines so that they could never understand what collective hive mind means really? Would they know? Or would they just be penned into an idea of it like pigs in a pen?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:59 AM
1

Follow it back further. There is a reason antifa is growing, supported by so many in the gov there and various 'capitalists' and their philanthropic political charities (soros, hillary clinton etc) appear on tax returns for antifa. Also that they in too many states seem to be allowed to act with too little police action, and lack of action on demasking laws - unless I misunderstood something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF772OKS5n8&t=370s https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/74cdfm/l…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:57 AM
2

Capitalism and communism are two halves of the same coin. The same people, who are all friends together, behind the scenes working toward the same goal. They are the coin. Hence why the capitalist states are now permitting what looks a lot like marxist trotskyist communism to make not just a resurgence but have committed to enforce it after all the countries unanimously signed up to UN agenda 21 and UN agenda 2030. You know that they met this year (72nd general assembly) to discus a "new global …
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:30 AM
2

Does he even know what a collective is? Being Borg and of the hive mind where fences are built around minds (called political correctness) which defines what you are not allowed and how you are allowed to think, how could he possibly ever know?
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:18 AM
1

Couldn't agree more with Sargon. Except that it is not as narrow as feminism alone. This comes from a myriad of ngos and political charities (that pay too well and advertise charity work as the third sector, whose sole role is social engineering, or more to the point manipulating/controlling us like sheep dogs of ideology), these came along pretty much everywhere in the world with a western like political structure, which is a lot of places where the UN has control over. This is part of the ramp…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:31 AM
6

That we are there paedophilic people pushing an agenda. That's the message I'm getting. That instead of it resulting the police making a visit or a court making an order against them, they are being sanctioned by the state, in pretty much every UN controlled country (which is near all of them, one ring in the darkness bind them, one ring to rule them all, the ring of the UN seas and logo)
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:13 AM
4

Yes, there are always, those too I guess. That said, there are legions of those weirdly motivated political groups registered as charities. Some how one day charities became more than a mere tax exception for charitable people to be charitable with less financial social/state burden against their socially returning charity, but into an exceptional income employment opportunity called in the 'third sector'. That to me sounds not much like what a charity should be like in A reasonably modern and c…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:23 PM
3

They are self indoctrinated and selected for support from those who are manipulating our societies globally. She has found friends and allies, and even likely funding to push her agenda too (a sort of social confirmation bias). That is what is wrong with her. What is wrong with many others is that they can't get past the stage of the simple fact that anyone else merely crazy and ranting gets nowhere, because no one funds them. Funding doesn't come with out an agenda. Agendas that make no sense, …
/r/MensRights09/10/17 11:33 AM
2

Well, yes. Because no one is addressing the cause of this, the people with sway over policy and law at the very top. No not politicans, above them. Things like UN agenda 2030, and those who decide how to apply utopian insanity in the countries around the world.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:27 AM
4

This isn't talking about education in general. It is making it gendered. It has some for examples at the start to excuse it, and the rest has nothing to do with third world countries. Such bald faced propaganda, is that easy to buy into?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:16 PM
2

Well yes because people are cattle 'hen'. Women cuck with bulls, and they then are cows. Why is this people as cattle, people as things to emotionally play with and subject to divicisive games from the owners of all areas of media, government and ngo/political charities etc come from?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:14 PM
3

Is that some cultural misappropriation as well? None of those look like polish names, russian, chinese, etc etc etc... Top 20 where?
/r/MensRights06/10/17 10:45 PM
2

So many still have no clue and think that the marxism in feminism is the problem.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:21 PM
1

Where do you guys think these words she speaks are coming from? The interviewer is smirking and a high pitched voice, she agrees with the woman she is interviewing. The long and short, the media, all of it, is owned by its sponsors. The political parties are all owned by their sponsors. Agenda 2030, because of its scope is going to have be ramped up on its efforts, BY 2030, not after. They intend to have 'sustainable' populations who live in sustainable cities, where there is sustainable employm…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:38 AM
4

So the news, movie stars, university professors all teaching that white men, the minority of men on the planet, are all racist psychopaths, with an increasing rhetoric every day - just ignore it and hope it goes away? I can only assume that you are neither white nor have children. Not if can see what that is and where it is going.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:34 AM
9

No its representative of the sanest so as to create a misrepresentation on a few levels. They, the sponsors of the media, do this with a lot of things, today and all through history.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 01:41 AM
10

No, if there were the media would be all over it.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 10:43 PM
1

Between the two more recent comments have hashed that out. Cheers guys. I think I now better understand.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:01 PM
1

Community service in your view is working in a factory for a specific non communal benefactor? Maybe I'm somehow oblivious to something here.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:45 PM
1

Then you aren't aware of agenda 2030? Sustainable cities and sustainable populations? Before immigration that UN agenda, enshrined in UK law 2007, would mandate a population reduction that is drastic, and still no open public discussions on how they intend to do that. The EU isn't the only problem. Far from it.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:44 PM
1

Europa The Last Battle explains this and predicts this. With lots of documentation. That is so far proving difficult to refute.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:08 PM
1

http://www.ukip.org/ukip_s_stance_on_uncontrolled_eu_immigration_vindicated damn I don't know what to buy anymore, they still have Nuttalls manifesto up. But are otherwise stating as of today 05 oct 2017 that; "Migration Watch today confirmed what UKIP has consistently stated for years, that uncontrolled immigration of low skilled workers does not materially benefit the British economy, instead it impacts on the job prospects of British workers, their wages and public services." Seems there -cou…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:46 PM
5

You call that community service? Which community is being serviced, exactly?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:23 PM
1

redtaboo ? why?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:23 PM
-1

Agenda 2030 is already being rolled out there then. Stalin/Lenins/trotsky/marx gulags, revamped for an new world. 'Europa The Last Battle' explains this, where it came from, who is behind it, and what to expect next. If we let it happen.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:22 PM
1

http://www.ukipdaily.com/letters-editor-thursday-5th-october-2017/
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:18 PM
1

Don't vote UKIP they are not what they were. They have been hollowed out by Henry Bolton, they have changed their logo, their motto, want to retain EU directives - but insist that they want out of the EU.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:14 PM
-1

Na that isn't masculinity, those are all rescue workers /s
/r/MensRights05/10/17 02:20 AM
1

Isn't that the whole point of the walmart camps? Into the ovens? .. maybe my sleep cycle/head fuzz withdrawl off smoking is affecting more than I imagined it ever could, but isnt that point of those recently made DUMBs? F it though, this time I'll push through the madness. I'll be free cold turkey.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:11 AM
1

Aww shit that was supposed to be tagged on to the thread below where I was responding to OP. Still "mass shooters tend to be male. Until we can have a discussion without getting defensive about it, we can never hope to figure out the "why"." You are framing this as a male problem. I am not hallucinating the words you are writing. Gaslighting though. That's a nice touch.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:21 PM
1

You don't want to know why those men came to, you want to frame it as something to do with them being men, you want an explanation that specifically links it to them being men. If you really wanted to understand it, you'd tear their lives apart and look for your answers in the people who act and separate them from from the law abiding. There is nothing honest about group guilt.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 09:37 AM
1

Ofc you are and do. That's why you frame that question the way you did. Naturally, we are just all nasty people reacting without reason. Amirite? Oh and we are having a discussion - about your question. You just don't like it and pretend we are the problem some more.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:06 AM
2

Oh I dunno Putting a skill down such as "brain addled marxist" or "feminist" for short, seems like it would be useful and helpful. Then rational employers can opt to not employ or employ as per their quota for socially violent trouble makers.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:22 PM
2

You asked a stupid loaded question, aimed it at men and fired. I fired one back, you aren't here to talk about men, you are here framing being men as a problem. Still, what is it about motherhood that makes women into child abusers?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:11 PM
1

Are biased propaganda polls the solution to convincing people to stop being biologically driven? Feminist controlled nordic countries say yes!
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:05 PM
5

How many have successfully made any push against feminism without controversy? If that is the way forward, how much of that is explicitly hostile vs courting their hostility? Personally I can't wrap my head around the notion that they are against fatherhood (patriarchy, the latin word for it) but then expect to be treated as though they don't hate men.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:54 PM
1

Dunno, why are most child abusers, for all categories of child abuse, usually women, even, their mothers?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:50 PM
7

Now he is at 9 so I up voted to 10, you are at 1 upvoted to 2. Mm.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:30 AM
6

Seems a rather complex version of rape, saying nothing, and move with them to permit them to carry on, but declare after the fact that you did not consent. Not saying specifically that it is not rape, merely, that this sounds rather complicated, and must involve the police at the earliest point that you can make it so.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:11 AM
2

MMmm I wonder, what would the subtle and intrinsic value of the outright question "are you 80%, 18% or 2% of women" and the resultant responses. Still you realise this is too simplistic and .. lost my train of thought, too drunk. Its too a few things, without using hate as deterministic centre. In part because hate would be unfair, both to what far too many women at heart have become and thus your portrayal, but also unfair to dispassionate critical viewing.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 11:55 PM
6

That is completely unfair. Some of those ideologues aren't like that. Sometimes they just claim "a man/men made her do it".
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:03 PM
5

Na don't be silly, everyone knows men aren't really human, they just look, sound and act like humans. /s
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:02 PM
6

I want to like your comment, but at four likes, like the comment in the image that you responded to, I just can't ruin it.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 09:01 PM
5

Well then, chop off their arms legs and genital tissues before they grow, and tell them its normal to be that way. They'll never know any different, because they won't remember so it is exaclty like nothing wrong was done to them, amirite? Fin sick response mate. That justifies F all.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:59 PM
5

As dark as the world is getting there are tiny rays of light these days.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:57 PM
24

Where did this happen. When did this happen. Who did it. Complain there now. Get a lawyer involved if possible. Can we get this to other mens groups? Others may help.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:49 PM
2

I responded until I realised.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 11:34 AM
3

Excellent as always.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:28 AM
3

Not really its a none answer. Just enough so that people can placate themselves 'she did answer', and thus give them permission to carry on with the agenda of destroying families and by extension both society and the economies of those societies.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:17 AM
3

She/it is just here to get people to waste their time arguing with it/her, while she concern trolls/attempts to convert.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:12 AM
5

There is nothing needless in recognising the active hate of feminism, the active hate in their lobbying, history, current day activities.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:10 AM
2

Yet you don't address it in yours, by leaving it. The entire ideology is expressly set against us. Therefore you are. Which explains why you are for us being silent and permissive, but not for fixing the issues in your ideology to which many are reacting too.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:09 AM
1

There is no need for that, yet you keep doing it. YOU.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:05 AM
6

You have come here as a feminist, and thus as a representive of feminism. Pretending that isn't one of the issues of what you represent because you presonally haven't said it, whilst you advocate for an ideology which EXPRESSLY pushes collective guilt on all men for the actions of a few men is fallacious. You are not winning friends with your duplicity here.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:04 AM
2

"Many Feminists such as myself, " Aren't egalitarians, so we support other feminists, just like us, who all believe that all ills in the world are caused by fatherhood, and thus cohesive families. We like to sound more intellectual and call use the latin, patriarchy. Then we like to really sound intellectual and cover our marxist desires for trotsky communism in lots of essays, practicing our efforts at copying and creating new ways of deceiving ourselves and hopefully you too that this is the t…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:02 AM
6

You don't think those good mothers and fathers aren't in collusion or permissive of this denigration? Were they passing between each other at work and the breakfast table petitions to sign? Before it got here. Yes, WE the full royal we of all of society. Suck it up. Get over it. Lets roll our sleeves up and fix it. If they were, did they revise and inspect deeper into the issue to find the true driving force and petition against that? Because there is one.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:56 AM
1

No it doesn't, but if you insist it is, then that is your stance and your self projection. Add more, if you wish, I am done.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:45 AM
4

6:45 I am one of those boys. I wasn't consciously aware, of all of my reactions. I was desperate for my mother, my father to hear me. But I was too young. I didn't understand they were just as enthralled as I was. I do now.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:11 PM
1

seems like a longer winded version of what I said. Foundationally. Credit us with bravery. Perhaps I'm being an imbecile though.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:53 PM
1

That would essentially jibe with what I said, or I thought so when I wrote it.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:50 PM
1

coming over and being. I thought those were different things. But yes I referenced you. I thought you weren't butthurt, but merely coming over as. I agreed with much of what you had to say. Seems I was at fault. Should I stand corrected?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:49 PM
1

I'm prepared to accept that men are more likely to act stupidly. One thing, the IQ bell charts seem to confirm it, and two, the difference between bravery and stupidity is often left to the outcome to resolve. So sure, give us stupidity, but it comes at the price of crediting us with bravery, even if unwillingly so. My dumbass 2 cents anyway.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:35 AM
1

Not all people are allowed to do that in public spaces. Not legally any way.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:16 AM
1

The definition of 'hate crime; misogyny' in some parts of UK is so loose that it actually does cover that.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:14 AM
2

Why would an agent provocateur troll do that?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:08 AM
1

Perhaps the first 10 playful ones, not so sure about the rest delivered with intent to punish.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:03 AM
1

Where did I call you that? I spoke of how you were coming over, from what I could read. But what exactly did I call you? Maybe I'm missing it. Perhaps you could do with referring to your own words; "You're drawing a direct comparison that I didn't make and attacking me for your failed reading comprehension.", those are your words, are they not?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:01 AM
1

Back lash? Should be x100000 lashes to her back. She might think twice if she knew violence would be returned to her.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:45 AM
1

He is speaking in very generalised terms. Also young people are increasingly hostile, not only to free speech. That isn't all of them, and intrinsic to the language it is imperative that it is not all of them, for how else can it increase? You are however coming over butthurt now. Many don't recognise the trap they have fallen into over this. Thinking like many have come to about young people, and then permitting that to become hateful and resentful whilst focusing on minorties of them, is one h…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:42 AM
1

Not timed to perfection, they use the fabian approach so only push the population into as tight a corner as psychologically we can accept without fighting back too effectively or without simply accepting it. It creates the illusion of hyper intelligence, greater resources, etc etc if you are on the other end of it. They often are quite smart and often do have more resources and options, but not on the scale that strategies like these leave people feeling/percieving.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:20 AM
1

Yes, I rather think they are more oppressed. By better funded and more readily available ideologues of various presentations all aimed at creating division and tension. Everything else is pretty much the same, except their greater freedom to commit crime and usually blame a man has increased, except where they could get their husbands jailed for not paying their own taxes. There we see another does of oppression for them.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:55 AM
6

If they did that to men, that would be condescending and insulting, and we'd spend less that a fraction of a second recognising it.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:50 AM
2

You cannot be 'feminist' (aka against fatherhood, or if you still insist on making yourself sound intellectual, the 'patriarchy') and truthfully or factually for or even 'not against' men. You are either fully consciously lying or so badly deluded that you don't understand how the two things are incompatible making you into a liar when ever you flip your script. So yes, all feminists. There is no such thing as a feminist that doesn't subscribe to 'patriarchy theory', or with that doesn't subscri…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:00 PM
6

It is a mens issue. Eliminating even spaces where you can 'relieve' yourself, slowly turning all of society into a place where you cannot go. You are not welcome, and no provision will be made for you to be there. How can that not be a mens issue?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:39 PM
2

Could go either way. I can't see enough information to assume either way. Its worded so as to use the readers biases to fill in the blanks. Intentionally or not, it does look that way.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:04 PM
1

Not 'the', just 'a'. But thoroughness demands that they prove their assertion true, not you prove it false, at least not in the first. The first is to establish legitimacy of the claim. Why spend time and effort arguing over an illegitimate claim at the outset?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 10:59 PM
3

in what way does "if he/she/it claims", makes that directed at you? How about if you are claiming that, then the onus is on you to prove your claim, not mine to disprove it. Does it make more sense now that I actually am now directing it at you?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:21 PM
1

Well that caught me by surprise.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:19 PM
1

Why if he/she/it claims that lie, its on them to prove it.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:14 PM
2

"These stunts probe the culture to see how explicitly and unapologetically anti-white-male sentiments can be expressed." That is also the purpose behind 'fabian' related ngos and also 'conspiracy forum' website owners and their data harvesting.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:32 PM
3

Bet they don't apply it to the migrants, just another facet of 'fabian'ing in kalgeri/agenda 2030 into play. They would never have suggested doing this 40 years ago. Hence the fabian ref.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:23 PM
1

If he wants to do that, really, just end all association legal, financial or interpersonal between men and their children. Macho culture will disappear almost faster than you can say 'bloody mary'.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:21 PM
4

What in the hell? Wow. Sheeet. 12 out of 10 to this troll. Feck, that troll has really put in some effort in to this. Maybe even roped some buddies to help looking at the comments, or just invented them too. Epic trolling there. MRA in this fellows case I'm afraid, stands for, Moist Ripe Ass-berries.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:45 PM
10

Um, Hhahhahahhahaha
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:53 PM
1

lol dunno about that. They'll keep the dilemmas 'for thee not me', as it were. Women are inherently more moral, dontcha know. It only becomes bad because of toxic masculinity, inherent to men, dontcha know. But they don't hate men, just toxic masculinity. Which is just as well because 'Beefcake-Droid 5000s' has all the bits of masculinity they don't hate, and none of the bits they do. This could solve a lot of problems.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:10 AM
1

Well, what else do you expect to come from women + political power to result in, given enough time? The laws are slowly but surely being redefined. That's what PC does, it censors speaking certain parts of the language, for 'reasons', for 'offence', at first to 'everyone'. Then pretty much only for specific groups.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:09 AM
1

So if some women diddles a little child, all women are peado child molestors too? Apparently it works when a power hungry politicians who are male are war mongers, therefore the men they force into wars who aren't like that (much bigger in numbers) are also war mongers that need to die. No it doesn't work like that?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:54 AM
13

How about you as a random woman, not go up to your random stranger and say things obviously intended to betray and portray your desire to control them, control their freedom to speak. Then act all offended when they do.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:52 AM
5

Ofc there will, its an islamic state. That's how islamic lands do things.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:00 PM
5

Since the foundation of all societies is the family, and the foundation of a family are two adults that stay together, yes, at its foundation feminism is against fatherhood - or a really fancy name for that, patriarchy. The rest after that is part truth, part self ego stroking BS and part misdirection partly for themselves partly for anyone else looking in at them. Because they are useful idiots and so too, the ideology that uses them as useful idiots will use anyone else that takes it too serio…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:30 PM
3

False rape allegations are a serious crime. But the way offenders are dealt with reflects a legal process in which men are the norm and women the deviants. Is she implying men are making more false rape accusations than women? She also seems to imply later that she should have had a 2 year long sentence. Then goes on to say a rapist often gets 8 years, so in reality she should have had, in fairness, 8 years x 15 counts, imo.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:43 AM
2

First the paradigm shift must be achieved. On a societal level.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:40 PM
0

If this was done by the onion it would have more credibility, as humour, that is. What BS. Its like the fawcett societies arguements for why women shouldn't go to jail ever. Murder is only damaging when men do it. Utterly absurd.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:25 PM
5

When will these false allegations start to hurt genuine rape claims? They keep saying it does or will. When? Has anyone seen some story where some women with torn bloodied clothes goes into a cop shop claiming rape and assault but was turned away only for the press to go psycho later?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:39 PM
3

So if someone decides you are already dead and decides to drop you off a cliff, that would be fine, amirite?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:09 PM
0

I'll wait until there is teaser trailer to watch, and to see the flavour of the PR hype they try to whip up. If it feels more like post modern ghostbusters, nope, if it feels more like ghostbusters 2 then yep.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:01 PM
2

Only where they are looking at being aggressive against some or a group that is likely to be violent back in an overwhelming way. There is a reason they make up most of child abusers. That so many rapes in detention centres are committed by women. The power difference is in their favour. They are not less likely, they are less capable, until the power difference is accounted for and balanced off.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:58 PM
2

lol yea I thought that, and then I got to 'male feminist' bit. Giggling stopped.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:53 PM
1

I assume any who makes arguments like that, has done just that. They then never want to have to/be forced to take responsibility.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 10:05 AM
4

Alternatively you could just throw 'red pills' of dripping meat into a piranha tank. Almost the same, no swallowing lots of biting.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:10 PM
4

He comes over as the most intellectually honest well intentioned person I believe I have ever seen talking at length on anything and everything he does. On that score, I have no issue with anyone that has their opinion that I disagree with, where they can explain it, and in detail, no matter how flawed I believe their views. He went from being a guy whose focus was on tyrannical systems and psychology, and well red on marx and trotsky to suddenly speaking out against gender pronouns and finding …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:48 AM
92

Last I looked a lot of comments blamed the man. Underlying suggestion of he deserved it because he's stupid.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:04 PM
1

This isn't new, its just another representation of a another wierd political NGO. In Britain, the main one I am aware of, who actively lobbies parliment with their studies is the 'Fawcett Society', and they really are a dripping tap of bull poop. Their words themselves: https://www.sericc.org.uk/pdfs/5943_fawcettwomenjustice.pdf newspaper reference: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2007/mar/13/crime.penal https://www.standard.co.uk/news/sexist-jails-are-failing-women-6960006.html
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:24 AM
1

I'd rather they took it down because it gets reprinted in the guardian, not because out of the light of the MSM they were shamed by a few hundred to a few thousand signatures.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:59 PM
1

I only wish that wasn't predictable.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:43 PM
3

I'd sign it if it was to get them recognition by international press and have them exposed on the world stage. I don't want them to get better at hiding what they are. I want the world to see them, because its the only way to get honest debate, thus stop them.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:41 PM
7

I hope they do some survival show and have only women set up a community from nothing in the middle of no where. With just cameras stuck to trees. Its not like we'd need to worry about violence or them coming to harm, their women, and above all that and better than men at making societies. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:32 AM
1

If I were wise enough to answer I would have. long ago. I am sorry I did not mean poetry. A chord was struck. A tone was played. I cannot claim to be the origin. I am just some guy. What can we do? Make a scene, sign a petition, stand forth be counted, what we must do is to be afraid. We need to stand where we feel afraid the most. For that is bravery. I count none as less for failing it, because when they look to their brothers, few if any cheer them. Jump off a cliff and many do. I think as a …
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:10 AM
1

If men build tech with an eye to their mothers, they do so to build totems to them. Something to speak to, when their mothers are lost to chaos that comes after, to the void they leave when only their hearts project them into the world. But heres thing ladies, you have to be worthwhile for a mans or daughters heart to project your afterthought into the void. Just as any of us must.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:00 AM
1

" There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people will not feel insecure around you." And yet we have feminism, modern corrupted government, single parent families, feminised education and special college/uni courses that teach that all men are rapists - all out to achieve just that with young and developing men and boys.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:03 AM
3

They play games beyond the best of us. Women in cliques play all sorts of games of power to fit their pecking orders. If you can't find your own style of way to fit into their games and hold your own, leave. Leave while you can on positive terms before they make you leave on negative terms. I can't fit into their games any more than you likely can. Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 12:17 AM
1

Can't be sure, but I think that company just committed suicide. Apart from inflating MGTOW numbers, driving many more ambivalent women from feminism, they are going to attract a lot of ire. At least the like to dislike numbers are, if nothing else, heart warming. An apology isn't going to cut it. But at least the hollywood circuit will employ the women in that.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:44 PM
2

What rape does it draw attention to? The rape of decency? The rape of civility? The rape of the social contract? The rape of the notion that women are trustworthy to any measure? The rape of any value or merit in our culture that made any of it worth while? What rape exactly does this rape of trust and belief and the benefit of the doubt for women does this highlight? None of those, because we, men and women alike do not stand up, do not make a scene. Only they make a scene so only they direct t…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:35 PM
8

Not only can those things be disregarded, they MUST be disregarded. Can't stop you discriminating against yourself by bad choices, and nature cannot be legislated away. Adding more laws, and taking away due process doesn't fix nature.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:24 AM
5

But why smear emperor Palpatine instead of using her picture?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:02 PM
1

If the TV, the media, internet search engines and government are going to keep making sure that tin foil hat is what mens rights comes off as, what are the options for breaking through that?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 12:00 PM
2

Ya know when I go looking for my comments I search for 'yduck'. I take my shots straight to the head.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:40 PM
1

Perhaps I misunderstood the notion of 'otherising'. I can only apologise, unfortunately it seems I am persistantly cursed to see the world from a perspective different to a lot of people and often that makes me an asshole a whole lot more often than I want to be ...
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:38 PM
15

Fair point. But the whole thing in context shows he was polite the entire time, taken from just that moment, I can see some people out there asking "what did the cop do before hand, maybe he was dick and prompted that". The cop was an angel, the girl was slowly escalating to complete egotistical melt down.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:00 AM
10

If you want to make the situation ambiguous and easier to misinterpret the cop as being the asshole, sure. Except the cop isn't.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:51 AM
3

"urinals have been removed from boys' high school restrooms, with the explicit aim of feminizing the men." And to cause urinary infections and damage.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:03 AM
1

How many say that about little girl raped by peados.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:57 AM
2

ignoring the question, yet you aren't trolling. Of course.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:16 AM
1

So you are trolling with terms like that
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:04 AM
2

So you believe that sex is, and should be, consent to parenthood, but, only for men?
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:00 AM
1

I know what a gay man is, but what is a G.A.Y man?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 11:58 PM
2

Reading that, I too would have to.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:48 PM
1

BS man. You really have peado bro's back? What about housing crisis making bro's back? Shit should be within reason, and after it crosses some lines, you 'have their back' you are worse than as bad. Because you set out to have not just their backs - but people that are worse, and you did it at the start. Some 'codes' are made to be abused from the start, by people who have some serious malfunctions. That code IS a prime example.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:44 PM
1

Instead of asking why can they, ask why can't they, then ask, why can't it happen to you. Those questions will lead you to protecting yourself and future children better, since we can't ask women to protect their own children from this. Men must protect their children instead.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:11 PM
4

Its an optical illusion caused by light reflecting on swamp gas from venus.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:22 PM
1

Police police theres a heterosexual man putting effort into getting laid. Arrest him!
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:46 PM
2

When I got to the end, undoomed's voice just popped in there. "hey moron, fucking moron".
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:41 PM
8

Thank you. Sorry it's just weirdly irksome when there's just a pic of a news paper article and no info on source. shrugs what can I say I can be an asshole sometimes.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:16 AM
7

Was that made with photoshop? No source. Just a 'picture'.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:33 AM
2

It is, was. That and if I am not mistaken, special laws for infanticide that apply only to women in other places. Or perhaps post partum is the same thing. That and the thing in many countries to give women leeway to wriggle out of responsibility especially when it comes to murdering their kids. long and short if its against the law, but the punishment amounts to "that was naughty, please don't do it again", the two things don't differ much. Does putting things in quotation marks in instance lik…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:06 AM
26

Feminist rape culture. but refreshingly honest for a change.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:46 AM
2

except the reality is there aren't equal numbers of boxes, and they aim to use positive discrimination to weaken, and relative to this example cut mens legs off so women can feel of equal height. If that's what they need feminism for; na frankly mate shes too bigoted to see that for the fallacious nonsense it is, another reason she needs to weaken men via feminism, but it makes her, well not your friend. Not after that declaration. Does she know what she declared to you? Did you actually hear wh…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:47 PM
11

This place, as others, caters to all sorts of people. Some more academic, some less so, some more emotional and impatient, others less so, etc. You can't change what people are. Not at that level.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:29 PM
0

Don't most places have special legal provisions for women doing this that makes it amount to post birth abortion, in far far too many places? Might be more british thing though, our courts go out of their way to not jail women, or if they do, they may as well have not bothered. Hope she is punished.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:01 PM
2

If that needs to be said its being strangled to death and is dying. Its pretty much too late. But that doesn't mean it has to stay dead. It can be revived. In theory.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:20 PM
4

That's a well that can never run out of hate, um, dry.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:56 AM
3

What do the customs and traditions of a backwards country have to do with mens - anything, in the west where we are?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:55 AM
5

He'll recover mostly. But he's seen now. He can't unsee.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:06 AM
6

Comments from the guys are entertaining, on the article. The men generally of course see through it. Even if some are ... stuck.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:03 AM
2

No I've concluded they must succeed so that there can be a chance that evil that is women (class/group/ not all individuals) with absolute power and zero responsibility can be witnessed by all. Difference is these days we have the language to describe why they will be that way. Far far too many cluster B psychopaths among women, because no one holds them accountable. Maybe then we can start proper social planning to correct the issue. Until then WAW takes over.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:28 AM
1

If women ruled the world, based on evidence on what they are doing where they can extend influence I would consider them to be a tyranny beyond that of nazi germany, communism, pol pot ... you get the idea. I'd react to women and their world on that basis.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:23 AM
2

I guessed you probably did, but, well, I put my foot in it from time to time, and sometimes, I'm just too psychologically exhausted so sometimes I really mess up. I tend to presume my brothers here are in their hearts well meant, even if they are reacting to things haunting their hearts and souls. There is no way to fix yourself. Not on this score. Please don't you will wound yourself in the effort and then, only leave any of us that work out it was us you attempted to shape around feeling guilt…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:49 AM
5

She thinks of him as a possession as a thing. So very many woman talk and think like that. Like its normal. It is. Psychopathy, zero compassion or respect from men being human. Its just normal with far too many women. That's what I got from that, on broader strokes. On his he stayed calm, checked the road before crossing, mostly. Self aware. Lost the chain of eye contact, and she advanced, but he maintained good distance. I hope he and any kids are safe now. Too tired to read through or listen t…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:35 AM
9

"women don't need men anymore" one of the comments. So why then should we persist in not giving men their toys, if women don't need them? Why is male sexuality disgusting, but womens 'sexy'? (kind of makes too close to 99% of women sounds like lesbians with a thing for birthing babies)
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:29 AM
1

MRA to these people; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxOZ6gifTjA If you don't know me by now You will never never never know me (Oh) All the things that we've been through You should understand me like I understand you Now baby I know the difference between right and wrong I ain't gonna do nothing to upset our happy home Oh don't get so excited when I come home a little late at night 'Cause we only act like children when we argue fuss and fight ..sorry but I read through that and ... this is wha…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:56 PM
9

Some people wonder how my screws got loose. SMH.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:40 PM
2

Just about to contribute this.. so won't double post.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:33 PM
3

There's what vonthe points out, and then there's the point that some of the guys here, in one way or another have been put through hell of various sorts. Often finding the people that they should have been able to trust just made it worse to greater or lesser measures. Sometimes it strikes me that sometimes, that damage and pain can just make a person blind to anything that doesn't prompt a defensive/offensive response. Assuming 'friend' and 'friendly' got them advice such as "you were stupid", …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:59 PM
2

Well there are swedish men, swedish women and the 'them'. By doing that there are three groups.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:33 PM
1

That's more of a technicality. No one thinks 'muscular person' when 'obese' is mentioned. But I do agree with your point. But then that is the whole point of BMI, to intentionally obfuscate reality. Healthy active kids with muscle are considered over weight to obese too. They then use it to push that there is a serious problem with kids. There probably is, but is it half the numbers they claim because of BMI? No way to know really.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:56 PM
7

It'll be an old article when our society is not still a good reflection of it.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:02 PM
1

Its everywhere now then lol
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:18 PM
5

Ha, hahahaha, hhahhahhahha. shrugs if they are going to be that bigoted and insensible then laughter is all I got for them. edit: that said, 4 comments on it, and all of them ... supportive of the notion that men and boys are human beings. Such gives me hope that one day...
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:48 PM
2

So your issue, isn't the rose, but the name given it? Do those sorts of feminists smell as sweet to you, is that why you find that term 'concerning'? Personally I find the term descriptive, and I can't say I have seen it applied to a feminist that doesn't fit the description it presents, with much regularity. Our views may differ on that I suppose. Vive la difference.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:40 PM
1

If you let her tell you that, and you act like you believe it, you are being mentally dominated and you are permitting your self to submit. Pray she is a good decent human being and won't abuse that - despite the point she is by disrespecting you and your boundaries. By being permissive to wards them calling you bigot, but dismissive of your reaction to the boundaries being crossed. Proving she is anything but decent. If you are sexually and socially submissive and want to end up talking and bei…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:48 AM
8

Is this to avoid manspreading whilst walking? Is that the next one? We manspread whilst walking, right?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:21 PM
1

What's next hormone and scaffolding treated stem cells so women can grow their own gonads? Good idea, that, they can get their kicks sewing their own ones on and then cutting them so that can all laugh like sharon osborne. I'll never forget that scene.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:21 PM
3

What's the source.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:05 PM
5

Reading those comments. Knowing there can't be any rational discourse with them. Indoctrinated by themselves into escalating levels of irreverisble child abuse - in some ways worse because it is a direct assault on the identity of a hell of a lot small kids - because mum hates males or just wants a specific gender child and nature screwed her out of her wants. I know how I felt after I learned a measure of the stuff my sister did to my nephew. My brother in law (now my brother, I feel I traded o…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 06:46 AM
20

Hey I've decided we should circumcise your arms off. You've already argued that your consent isn't needed, so you're fine with that, right? Moron?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:56 AM
1

I pretty much feel what you're saying. The feeling of a distant emperor controlling, manipulating and influencing all around just pees me off more. It might help to leave this stuff behind for a while, but, its getting so crazy I never know what new level of crazy is going to crop up like an inverse version of whack-a-mole, where the mole whacks you.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:52 AM
0

Different group of chrisitians don't under most circumstances add political power to the most vile of christians campaigning to .. add more hate on their chosen group. Feminists do. Its not the same, and that separates the two things. Sanity is optional, so are strawmen.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:50 PM
1

Ok, I did need that last comment. I can't concede that I feel I was entirely wrong. Lethn does get where I am coming from. As it were. He also gets why I am less often like it. The bit I don't understand, nor how to salve, is why when it does happen now, it plumbs to deeper depths and stirs me more so these days. For my own personal desire not to be, afflicted so, I appreciate your last comment. You know this recent spate of western media attention on female suicides is likely to be co-opted in …
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:56 AM
1

The last two. Watch one of the modern addams family movies.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:53 PM
1

Some of them some of the time as in not women, but people as in men too as in human beings do, sometimes because of gender relative to other peoples positions to be utter dicks about what ever bee is in their bonnet? Absodamnlutely. That women as in anyone who can be ascribed to the group women, will assuredly provably face discrimination without exception -what the hell have you been smoking. edit ... digressed way too much, drinking.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:41 PM
2

That is a good question, if that can actually be solved politically I'll be surprised. I think you underestimate the complexity and the potential for change without unduly joining the feminists in making life hell for the majority of good men that don't. But I wish the discourse the best of luck, and hope to be proven wrong.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:43 PM
1

I'm not pissing on those girls. Though you seem to think I am. Because you seem to think I'm picking a sex to care about. A unilateral state and condition. Taking something from them, that they should be entitled to. I'm not blaming them. Not attacking them. Nor their families. Apparently 'there are times' means I am always this way with no flexibility. Thank you for that insult. I return it to you, I have no need for it.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:13 AM
17

Like the racist comment from the black guy.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:43 AM
-2

There are times I just can't muster any compassion at all for the females of our species. Worse, I know they will just piss more hate on all things male to the point that that will only get worse. Funnier still women vast majority of them it seems, by nature are negative sum. Meaning that if there are efforts to bring male suicide epidemic that has been going on for years, will either result in increased militant and state sanctioned efforts to silence that awareness raising now they have focuse…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:28 AM
2

Ideological war, and these people that support, hand out fines, arrests for this aren't people they are combatants.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:08 AM
1

They all pay better than working in day care?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:58 AM
6

Yet another reason to consider women toxic. The cop acted on policies at his station(edit: probably). Many have mandatory arrest policies for mysoggyknee-esque situations (any time a woman says she is offended or just wants some male dragged off and beaten into submission - don't count on that last part being figurative for much longer). In the UK that is actually law now. We have that under hatespeech and it can result in a jail sentence. That guy would be off to jail.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:51 AM
3

She sounds too weak to have a boyfriend. What she has is a man that she manipulates into service using her pussy. Which makes it even worse for her psychologically. She doesn't even like him if she talks about him like that. Seriously. Could you spend 24/7 with someone and like them and manipulate them for your own ends constantly or work to keep them off balance so they never work out how pathetic and worthless you are to them in reality? Don't think I could do that to someone I like let alone …
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:39 AM
1

The dominant form of feminism is McKinnions - McKinnion was funded by the National Science Foundation. The NSF was set up under Nixon, the purpose was to stay ahead of USSR. So, they co-opt ye olde soviet ideological warfare to get more workers for less? They have created a mental virus. But it only really exists as long as it can secure funding. There are all sorts of crazed loons out there. Most don't get the same funding and organisational support.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:31 PM
1

Look again at corbyn, his party, its members Jess Philips? Tory vs labour = feminism vs feminism. There is not even one sign in the main stream voting options that it can fix it. Not even one. Plenty that voting can make it worse. Edit, that is not to say that with appropriate options it couldn't.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:07 PM
3

A better term for what, naive arrogant bigot? That's about the nicest I got about 99.9% of feminists and feminism that've seen. But then personally I don't think all the worlds problems are cause by heterosexual fathers. Aka patriarchs, or as a system of said type of person, patriarchy. I'm not that simple or hung up on freud. Apparently YOU DO.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:01 PM
2

To be a feminist means you hold certain ideological declarations. Ones that are distinct and separate from egalitarianism (which shits all over any bull feminists got about equality). Prime among those is 'patriarchy theory' or fact, if you are one of the adepts of the feminist cult. There is no difference in any feminist other than their individual characters and behaviours that separates them from other feminists, different expressions of the same bigotry. No matter how equal that bigotry.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:53 PM
3

Never seen a woman waiting for a man. Something tells me the response to any woman asked would be something along the lines of "have better things to do". Which leads to, I'd bet for just about any response, why the hell should men be dragged along for female shopping trips?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:42 PM
1

No it is against feminism to advocate for BASIC human rights for men. The two things are at war. You can't advocate for shared parenting, sexual meaningful consent for men, the right to know if you are a father rather than the to hope you are after being picked to be one. Because feminism and feminists ARE against those things. It is public record in a lot of places around the world.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 06:03 PM
2

Too over burdened by compassion, empathy, logic and lack sufficient sadism or fascism to want to be associated with that label. I also generally think of myself as human and thus 'generally equal' to every one else, without a need to think of fair treatment as hateful. So no. I have too much of a crick in my knee to kneel to that.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 06:00 PM
12

I wonder if by passing manspreading laws, that useful semen levels drop by 5-18% because of the increase in average temperature the balls end up being kept at.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:57 PM
1

I like the mouse that mancheeze goes with. Out to nibble as much mancheeze as she can, but is too hateful to ever get much from any but the most self conflicted and down and outs.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:40 PM
1

Horrifically cruel to children of all species. (adults too, but that ain't as emotive).
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:38 PM
1

This is the problem with skimming, when you are already primed with a possible confirmation bias. Fair point. Makes more of a game theory competition thing though really, with a shit ton of people, as part of the game, completely against exposing the rules ... because of female ego and selection criteria - namely holding women accountable immediately deselects you. Actually that makes it worse, and most men in to a bunch of simpering supplicants.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:24 AM
4

What ever the hell it is, it is here, and so far voting doesn't seem to be a way to fix it.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:21 AM
1

Yes he does understand. He is pro Islam. That's why he's saying that shit. He is against white people. I assume that anyone that tries to shame people for not being ok with white cultureS, homelands, families being destroyed by other ...what the hell is ISLAM is part religion, part politics, part legislature, part banking conglomerate ... the closest I have ever heard of in the west is a business family that owns the big business, the homes, shops and everything in a town. .. someone trying to s…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:05 AM
4

Especially if the victim is an underage child. Or was at the time.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:40 AM
1

Soo, reading that, extrapolating, if men are; fair, strictly fair, aka 'true egalitarian' with women, perceptually that is 'hate' or disrespectful, and certainly without question unfair. if you treat them a little special, 'just for them', for women, perceptually that would be ok, fair, reasonable. More so special, for womens perceptions that is respectful and unquestionably fair (until one of them finds an angle, and the hunt is on to find it, maybe not all of them, but it is an issue) Non of t…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:26 AM
7

Can't decide if abbreviating Benevolant Sexism to BS, is a good thing or a bad thing. Mostly because I have to keep breaking flow to remind myself she isn't talking about men or women with low or high Bull Shit levels. Except that it is. But it isn't. Need more coffee.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:15 AM
1

What did I just watch. The only two who seemed to be there to do any scoring and reaching out were clementine ford, who only succeeds with her choir, and that rather nice straight backed brunette. But although she used solid quotes it seemed that none of them had worked out how to work their words, to work the people to build the narrative.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:08 AM
5

though personally I think treason. You can't incite hate against (half) of a countries population, because once you can talk about it terms of the total population it IS an attack on that country and its infrastructure both meta and literal.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:49 AM
10

they should be arrested for hate crimes.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:48 AM
3

in his other article he openly states he intends to abusively socialise his son TO ensure bullying, bullying that doesn't stop either because his son will be specifically raised incapable of standing up for himself.That measure of abuse is beyond.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:28 AM
10

But what if boys don't want to be spoken to as though the only way they can feel capable is to manipulate someone else into doing things?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:26 AM
5

A great many women ARE teenage girls. They stop developing in the brain and mind as young teens. Have no pressure to develop beyond their base nature. They (women as a total group) just aren't socialised to live in a civilised society.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:18 AM
1

The words 'man' and 'woman' alone become gender slurs in their mouths and minds. Because what those things mean to them and mean to everyone else is not the same.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:15 AM
1

Somehow that needs to be fitted on to a t-shirt.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:09 PM
2

A certain C (moore) Dick of the police force probably does too.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:07 PM
1

Had you not placed the 'note' I would never have know that you thought that. Being a law student though I would have thought you would be more familiar with that word, but then I am not a lawyer or apprentice to it. So, not really in a position to speak I suppose.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:06 PM
1

Yea its the same cog that fucks up all systems, for humans. There's always a a few groups of aholes who try to exploit, sooner or later, everything. Even things and in ways that you never imagined.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:53 PM
4

Another reason to recognise women as simply evil. Not because all are, but because far far too many are, and the damage they do, just isn't worth it. Not with the attitude and crap you get before you get there. Sex just isn't that great.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:10 PM
31

Complaining to the police didn't help. They (mother and son) needed an EU human rights lawyer and an MRA group to intercede FIRST. Sad that they are trying to make it look like she alone is in that belief. She isn't and this is step closer to people having to accept they have been mutilating their sons, and that they have been lied to as to why.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:00 PM
2

crazy, crazy for lovin' you..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OVtpnpCOKM I heard love in Italy was crazy. Too much to hope that wasn't getting as crazy as the rest of the 'western world'.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:56 PM
2

Dammit I used to want that but with the other plumbing option.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:51 PM
37

Unfortunately when it comes to voting and in group bias, its surprising how often they do.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:09 PM
6

Not being funny but a survey as openly atrocious and offensive as to a question like that would get stupid responses from me. I could with ease be one of those people who answered that sex isn't cheating.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:24 PM
1

No. I think its disgusting. Schools in the UK used to have shorts as part of the uniform. They took that away to force boys to wear skirts.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:00 PM
10

I've heard lines like that from women. Men being stupid for believing women. Its a really good lesson to see and realise - they mean it.-- not always or all women under all conditions. But the sort that say things like that. well
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:56 PM
6

Its a good article but we need more like her in positions of power presently. Because at the moment theres the silent, the feminist and the feminist afflicted and infected as voices, and its getting worse. But she's right, women as a group in total betrayed - screw men - their sons. Their own children. The watch in glee as other women destroy them and set up the suicide epidemic.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:37 AM
2

What he doesn't like the face it keeps off the PR side? Think he needs to learn there is a difference between what he thinks and has been taught his feminism is about, and what it really is about.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:30 AM
5

So pretty much she admits that what she applies to her self and in terms of thought and consideration is 'caring' and that she has never once considered applying that to her husband. Even there she is uncomfortable with including him in 'equality' or her feminism. Or she doesn't want to apply care and consideration to him and his needs. Why marry someone whose closet point to loving you is when they forget how much contempt they hold you in.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:27 AM
–

Gee who could have predicted the possessive and unhealthy approaches lesbian couples would have on products of heterosexuality AKA Kids. Could the domestic violence figures possibly have been used as predictive. Those kids should be enraged. Feminists saw fit to make a system where they were given to the most abusive group around. Of course they were going to have those problems, pains, and possible severe long term unfixable damage done to their personalities.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:19 AM
1

Its the modern version of slavery. The notion that people are actually paid wages is a magical illusion.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:11 AM
52

What consent from men doesn't mean anything. Just take what you want from them, and its socially acceptable? Well that is truth. Your right it hurts. I want it changed. I want to be human just like women.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:32 AM
-3

If you can't assume a date wants sex with you. Then they should have no expectations on you at all. Dating and marriage IS all about sex.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:29 AM
1

Sounds like you and I are more or less on the same page there.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:47 PM
4

Assisting? Not being funny dude - I Do Not Want What You Are Smoking.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:45 PM
3

All sorts of trojan mice are being dusted off, redressed in modern clothing and sent amongst us.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:07 PM
10

Not being funny dude she pushed and pushed and pushed and pushed. She singeld out someone who was specifically vulnerbale to being killed by psychological pressure and by making them vulnerable by saying 'love you' rarely. She also premeditated a dry run for the parade and attention. I think of that as premeditated murder. She chose someone vulnerable to her selected weapons. Relevant to the victim and her self.... edit.. perhaps it isn't murder. In some ways its worse. This person needed help, …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:45 PM
15

Well we have two genders, female and rapist. Why are you susprised?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:39 PM
2

What times would that be then? Perhaps you can think of an example or two where we can instead of perceiving that in the more ordinary light perceive it in its relevant context? To be fair, my first reaction to words like that is not often very co-operative. Either.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:32 PM
1

"Came here to say that." Apparently that is a reply to me. I followed the link from the inbox. You want to start issuing challenges without cause, especially any reasonable cause mate, you can do the leg work. I'm not coming to you for your self sought pissing contests.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:18 PM
2

Ain't got anything other than I think you're as right as a very right thing is right, to that.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:12 PM
1

The true face of 'good women'. These are those good women, that other 'good women' pay to see. These 'good women' make up the majority of the population of women.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:24 AM
7

That links claims that cuckoldry/non paternity might be 1 in 30. http://socialpathology.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/promiscuity-data-guest-post.html http://www.statisticbrain.com/percent-of-female-infidelity-based-on-number-of-premarital-partners/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxHIftZVfrQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um3EmS9DKsI These can be interesting. But the the first two, more directly appropriate, are suggestive that it is a hell of a lot higher. Unless you think there are many women aroun…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:39 AM
2

That said though. She has shit boundaries, her anger is really with her self for letting that happen. She is projecting on to him. There is a problem that she needs to address and its not the male population its her boundaries.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:22 AM
-1

She explicitly states she permitted him to enter her without a condom. "I found the idea tempting but didn't want the risk, and told him this. He placed it in without a condom anyway, just to see if it would change my mind." To do that without her consent she would have been been actively saying no or something else, it would have become forceful on his part, and resisted on her part. Or she actually gave him permission based on that reason.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:21 AM
1

There is a difference for being accepted for who you are vs accepted for what you are. I'd find the who she is easier to accept if she was so full of hate and bile, but neither do I accept tubs of whaling lard. I just don't have that many oil fuelled lamps.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:17 AM
4

Click the link in the video description and watch the full 12 min one instead of this snippet. Or try watching them both and then fastforward through the 12 min one.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:11 AM
3

What if group b is emotionally soft and tends to vote for sound good feel good cute things that eventually lead to destruction and resources being spread too thin across too many that don't add to the resource pool, and who never have historically either possibly because they don't even come from that land? Giving them the vote will not increase liberty, in the short term it will, and lots will 'feel good' about it. Not in the long run though.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:11 AM
1

I used to think I was and I used to be able to answer that question easily. I can't any more. I do have egalitarian leanings. Unfortunately too much of that in society is really really bad. Giving women the vote and power brought about things like the temperance movement and a period of gangsterism, bachelor taxes, white feather movement, feminism, islamification, unbalanced multiculturalism at a pace that is too fast. For example much of london, or manchester or.. isn't in britain any more as f…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:07 AM
1

No destruction is not against nature. Its a natural part of its cycle. But we are humans. We are capable of initiating those cycles early, or derailing them and perhaps resetting them. Feminism is a destructive one, but one that doesn't act alone. People like Soros for example are not beyond inflaming things with little injections of organisational and financial support to get things going.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:55 AM
5

I started thinking pretty much the same, then pondered that. On the other hand it could be that the judge just has a bias against sending people to a corporate prison. Yet considering what I have seen in the media regarding female sentencing, and in studies, I find it hard not ponder the extent to which WAW was the cause behind his words.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:33 PM
1

Im not sure the top 10%ers who work 80-100+ hours a week will be that forgiving to society that they essentially can't make work.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:28 PM
18

What we are talking about here is 300,000 down payment before the rest comes in from the takings, right?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:24 PM
9

I was more thinking in terms of a straight forward civil suit on the advertisement. Not many of us have the kind of money lying about to do that stuff. That's highest court and barrister stuff. Course if you can - awesome. Didn't stop and think about applying and suing on that angle, which seems to be a bit more clean cut, possibly cheaper. Worth investigating the options. When tired I first tend to think in terms of what I can immediately take action on - generally a useful approach, not always…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:51 PM
50

Illegal in the UK. Just pointless to fight.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:16 PM
1

You end up in a court and face several years in jail, where in some countries any evidence you have may be anything from inadmissible to a crime in its self and you may not be permitted to mount any actual or a highly handicapped defence after removing your evidence? Didn't know being tripped by a leprechaun could do that to you. You poor thing.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:22 PM
2

You sure most male date rape happens like that? No way they just aren't reporting it because like you keep spreading shit. I can tell you people like you spreading your lies DOES stop people reporting. - the position that it is impossible to happen to a man is a lie.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:18 PM
3

Yes, none of that equates to being of service = the reward. I get that under a perfect system men and women are in service to each other. I just don't see how doing things for others and getting denigration or just more opportunities to be a good servant. Not seeing the reward.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:15 PM
1

Are you saying you couldn't work out what I was trying to say? How many more times do you want me to concede? Are you that much of an 'alpha' dick?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:11 PM
3

You think being of service to especially women is a reward for masculinity?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:45 AM
7

That's premeditated murder. By proxy, but she'd have made sure what her boy friend and his buddies were like, and she'd have carefully wound them up over time FIRST. Before using them like a gun and pulling their triggers.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:43 AM
2

The thing with that is it's de-personification by default. You can't be a category and a person, not once they start acting on that point. They don't realise it but the propaganda they have sucked up means they have made themselves into psychopaths incapable of empathy. You can't be empathetic to the person, if you reduce them to a category and attempt to exercise empathy and with that presumably compassion with that.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:41 AM
4

Shitty effort to be manipulative. Shitty attitude. Shitty choice of words. Carry yourself like a man worth listening too first. Rather than a fucking winging sissy yourself.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:34 AM
1

10/10 on effort. shrug
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:37 PM
1

That was interesting. I only skimmed it. But so far my preliminary feel is that 1-4% is more like wishing on a star. Vast majority of it comes down to opinion/honesty polls. The times they just got the population and tested the people, 1-4% wasn't what they found, but the numbers of people are fairly small, or restricted by the point they actively seek paternity testing. I'll read it through properly sometime though, it may yet convince me. So cheers for the link.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:33 PM
1

Well the next day they'd be burying me. I'd die of laughter on the day it was announced.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:18 PM
1

I'll take my fate as it comes. All death is certain. I won't first surrender by beliefs and die that way first, not for them. But, if one feels war is imminent, it surely would be wise to train to some extent. Also to consider expanding your emergent and emergency response knowledge. Perhaps consider making, even loose connections with some like minded local people. Etc etc etc. Improved knowledge and preparation and all that jazz. Eadala has the sort of idea that I'm talking about. That and I h…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:17 PM
1

Yup. Fair comment. Cheers for the convo.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:00 PM
2

I prefer your version of schrodingers rapist.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:54 PM
7

I thought the gay ones were issued gay cards with little rules printed on them with an electron microscope (gays have great eye sight), one of which meat they had to think about that 40 times a day to make up for the time they think about men. Maybe I've been misinformed, mind.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:52 PM
3

Dammit I knew I was forgetting someone.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:48 PM
1

Ok perhaps I went too far with that wording. But it would be difficult not lay a percentage of the blame there. There is no adequate way of understanding the extent of the difference that no feminism and no feminist effect on everything that we see around us would make. Would we even have been raised as anything like the same as we were?.- 'forgotten men'. Mmm. Interesting concept. I suppose yes, at one time its how some places decided it was time to go and have a bit of a war when you started t…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:46 PM
1

You make some wonderful points, and perhaps my use of semite was a bit sloppy. I none the less believe you almost certainly understood what I intended to be understood, rather than looking to start a convo on that topic.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:23 PM
5

Hitler youth are back? Will they have their own lovely little uniforms too?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:06 AM
68

Rape is essentially any time there isn't a contract, production crew, multiple witnesses and recorded evidence, and a change of hands on significant sums of money with receipts all acting as 'enthusiastic affirmative consent'. Anything else is subject to being, or becoming rape after the fact.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:05 AM
6

That was spectacular. Surgically avoided issues that a lot of other women are now starting to experience, and will do in record numbers when they start turning 50 etc. No men. No kids. No family. No memories. No photo albums and videos of the kiddies. Very many men get used to that isolation earlier. Not too much longer now. Evil individuals like her know that too.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:31 AM
1

Mmm that would make the feminist wage gap stuff then a good smoke screen to make any serious discussion disappear in sea of BS links on a google search. Also prime many peoples responses to such talk with a desire to not hear it.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:43 PM
1

Lets count the number of porn users vs the number of rapists. Got a feeling it'll work out a lot like the number of men that drink water vs the number of rapists ... oh, but to make this fair, only do it for MALE rapists. I've no idea what the actual figures are but that's my guess.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:39 PM
5

I think it'd be hilarious to see the reaction to someone making a reversed gender satire version of this. You can almost hear them, screaming in the distance, fits of rage rippling through through those crazed brain addled feminist zombies.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:22 PM
3

Can't say I've seen much banning other than the relatively rare 'feminist in disguise' or outright feminist that has come to in truth be uncivil, or at least uncivil in my view. But then I consider a lot of feminism to be somewhere between highly uncivil to > <, theres just nothing to say. Well nothing you'd need to say to anyone reasonable about some of the insanity they spew. Some of them are quite artistic with the way they can jovially weave their insanity into seemingly 'reasonable discours…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:12 PM
10

zu must go viz ze grup sink, herr feminifisted!
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:04 PM
2

You ever heard of "a boy called sue"?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:37 PM
3

You aren't wrong for feeling what you are feeling. Not even the bit that makes you feel this is a shit post. There are reasons you are feeling them, and all of them are connected to reality. Thing is once this settles in and you accept that the world around you really is divided by this, and that there is division between men and women that is curiously becoming more archetypal nazi and jew like - which is what you are seeing here. Your view of them (those people who act on it, to take the role …
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:12 PM
3

No the best approach is one that teaches them what they are by showing them that they have become fascist nazis. Literally.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:02 PM
3

Trouble with dark numbers, is they are seemingly difficult to quantify in any solid and meaningful way. But given we have clues for things like rates of alcoholism and violence in men, and the knowledge that when things wind men up, they tend to act and do something (like those two things) I think its not entirely unfair to say that depression and psychic disturbance in general of men is on a far greater scale than is being acknowledged and responsibly treated by society.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:56 PM
2

Trouble is depression in men, like diabetes and obesity, is a yard stick of success. Not entirely, and yes it is rather sloppy, as it misses a lot of detail, but yes, both do indicate success of a specific and definable group(s) who functionally act to augment those figures. Depression in men can be laid at feet of feminist manipulation of gynocentrism and as a result, their effect on laws, policies, social norms etc Not entirely, but to what fraction in each mans case? Once you start to break d…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:50 PM
1

Also got beater. Others differ.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:27 PM
1

In which case that claim (and I believe it to be fundementally correct) is wrong. Because it is too simple. Doesn't matter how attentive they are when that will be used by female teachers to teach them to give up. (intentional marking bias, drugging, 'shaming' and other abusive short circuiting of natural and healthy neural circuits in boys destroying them as they grow). Recess isn't enough. You need to remove women from education entirely. They can't be trusted not to push disgusting ideologies…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:26 PM
2

No simply attempting to advocate for (rather than against) men, will cause them to seek you like a shark follows a drop of blood in the water.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:21 PM
1

Might as well ask if you can exterminate the jews and be pro-semite.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:20 PM
7

Its a classic story, boy meets girl, boys falls in love with girl despite his failings she gets with him, girl gets boy to prove his love via suicide. Looking at fatherhood, in this age, its a classic, hell even normal story.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:47 PM
1

Because you don't exist as a human being, therefore rape is not something that can happen to you. Your consent doesn't mean anything, only what can be taken or extracted from you (for example semen, that matters, because it belongs to the nearest woman that wants to claim possession of it. Its only yours until it leaves your body.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:43 PM
33

For that reason I just assume mothers hate their sons. Seriously how can you love your child and then let this stuff happen - or worse, actively vote for it, or take part in programs to spread more of it?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:22 PM
28

"there doesn't seem to be anything here" in red at the bottom. All I could think was, because having read that, there isn't anything that any who thinks of men as human need to say. There isn't anything that anyone who could write like that can hear to make men human, either.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:15 PM
15

By being male, men lose touch with their male feelings? WTF? At least there was a slight nod to the point that too much female control (how boys are raised) is a factor. Although that isn't explicit in the article. It is a very very slight nod.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:19 PM
38

Toxic femininity. Too much gynocentrism, full stop.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:18 PM
2

Well that'd be what separates a cause from a cult.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:12 PM
2

No hadn't seen it. Just more education about female nature.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:14 PM
5

Equality and rights for every one, as long as they are pure arians .. umm women.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:55 PM
3

This guy on the other hand, might just have that inspiration you were hoping for. :)
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:58 PM
22

Holy. One of those moments when you wonder if there will be day that the legal minefield and artillery fire will cease and make women worth it again.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:56 PM
3

Apart from being another out of luck duck, who will think well meant things in your direction, sorry brother. I ain't got much inspiration for you. Could work out hard for the kids if at some point (even if unspoken) they are under pressure to forget/not think about you and 'adopt' (emotionally, psychologically) this new man 'as dad'. Like 'dad' is a job role not a biological right and innate connection type thing. It reduces 'dad' from parent to mothers, mm, 'advocate'. This really is a vicious…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:39 PM
43

I fight if war comes here. I don't trust my politicians. I don't trust the way they have orchestrated what looks more and more like a silent take over. So I trust even less the notion of being recruited and sent away from protecting my homeland, if it needs it. There are people here I love. There aren't any 'over there'. If that don't sit well with you, so be it. Peace.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:22 AM
1

Depending on where you dating within a university can range from not that great an idea to such a bad idea that its silly. Regarding dating feminists, well, are you psychologically a masochist? If you aren't you will be, if you insist on staying with her. Just look at that steve shives fella. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8I69wKED0U Bearing does a good job on him. Apparently that is what being with a feminist does for ya.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:58 AM
12

Well now they have a growing rash of MGTOW. A lack of dads entirely seems to annoy and please them with opportunities to indulge is social sadism too.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:23 PM
6

Every woman you see urge a man to 'be a father to the not your kid' wants to encourage a society that says that is reasonable because they want to do it to you. edit-- also he ain't to blame for whatever he does in response. He isn't the one doing anything to the kid. He and the kid (as well, should do) have just discovered mummies betrayal of them both. She did this not just to him but to the kid too. For him his child has just died. The kid he had all those years, although still there, isn't h…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:02 AM
1

Nearly 90% of women have experienced heterosexual interaction in the world. But because they didn't both want it and say yes at the time, its sexual harassment. Fine. Women don't want to write articles point that out as a fact and refute that claim, then fine f em.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:52 AM
7

Then why didn't you complain to the teacher at the time? Why didn't you say shes screaming spurious lies about me, why? Stop her spreading that? Part and parcel of the issues we have today is that men meekly accept this shit instead of complaining right back like they have the same rights to be thought of as human ... and then to find it insulting twice over. The damn teacher shouldn't have done that. The teacher should have taken both of you, and asked the screamer whats up first and then round…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:45 AM
10

At first I thought that. Then I realised under a feminist world, men don't get education.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:38 AM
8

No such place exists, especially not for men.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:44 PM
0

Why do you berate him for the assumed position of exclusive relationships (most I suspect are) vs your assumption that its 1-4% and honest, or at least lacking in dishonesty? All are positions of assumption. There has never been a population study of it that I know of. The only hard figures we have are were men push, shoved and got a dna test - possibly destroying their lives to get it, as a consequence. Your position in effort to appear more balanced is dishonest.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:46 AM
1

Was he responsible for the way it was cut too? I presume it was cut and edited.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:39 AM
1

Why not enough women doing the battering yet? Not enough male deaths? Not enough free passes for women in the legal system? The numbers she lies about obviously don't shock her.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:23 AM
-1

Except that is what SJWs do.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:23 PM
0

Yep, inform them you wouldn't want to give your money to a sexist bigot that assumes your bad intent and violence because of your gender. Nor them, as they are willing to push it on her behalf, making them sexist bigots too. Then bid them a good day.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:42 AM
1

Shes xenophobic. America isn't where she is from, so it needs to change.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:12 AM
1

Then so is the other.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:11 AM
1

Dunno, why is wrong to say most child murderers are female, so in all women is a child murder, but not "most terrorists are Muslim, so Islam is murderous"?
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:10 AM
1

Some one is aware. Would you believe I guseed but hoped this post woudlnt happen until 2 years from now?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:48 PM
1

"I'm not arguing for anybody. I don't know enough about the subject to support either. But in general, the guy who will " This is the person I will give thought over.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:46 PM
1

I dream of a world where my hates, insecurities and fears make me feel like an arsehole. With no mirror but my own. Where I find only my fear and no substantive mirror. I am afraid.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:37 PM
1

I wonder. How many see as I see. Anger as I anger. Its not race or gender ... its the point these a holes need this to be their point. Their real point is that hateful and decisive that they need us to be as hateful and divisive as they are. Don't let them have this control.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:34 PM
-2

\First there is a rappe cultire. One that condones your rape. Don't make this commment yours.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:23 PM
1

You mean to tell me that, and perhaps I am too drunk at this hour, shit, That aside from divorce and birth there are mp examples?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:22 PM
1

Very well, and the condition of the those who have fallen into its thrall, the extent of which can be compared to being taken into a religion or cult? Is there a suitable verb for 'propagandised' which carries a similar meaning to brainwashed? Because these people do seem to believe the shit they spout. I am ignorant of a great many things, if there is better word for that, that I can use, I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:14 PM
1

Merci, Charlie. I suspect you are charlie hebdo? Je suis...
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:09 PM
9

What crimes? The stabbing in London? Perhaps the bombing in Manchester? Was it the peado gang where investigations were suppressed because of racial sensitivities? Or the other one, or the other one ... mmm something of a pattern there. Bacha wouldn't say that in public though, eh? Cos that play is racist.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:04 PM
6

Feminists are predatory. Curiously though, I find they don't act quite like predators ordinarily. They act more like dogs at a fox hunt. That sort of predator. Under those sort conditions and circumstances. But from my perspective they are predators. They are a something I need to be aware of, conscious of, and if possible aware of before they are aware of me. Pampered predators are a special kind of dangerous. One day people will remember they belong to a species. Like any other. Except that ou…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:00 PM
2

Ain't a foggy here on the woman either. But what my alcohol addled mind thinks is; I'd expect what she thinks of as a reasonable comment from a number of personality types, the narcissist; correcting and elevating themselves in their mind the psychopath(sadist,aware); correcting, aware of the narcissistic element, and monitoring others reactions for their targeting criteria.. the careful; concerned about making mistakes, by default rather than conscious intent mistakes others for bretherin in th…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:45 PM
1

putting up with their shit-testing (this is how women do “negging”—remember all that PUAspeak?) Sadly I just had a few drinks, and about to go for a run, or perhaps that is fortunate, I'll have a topic to focus on. But damn that is one crystalline point from which to take a view. Damn that rule of default. The mistake of thinking I understood something, and never realising that I'd done sod all thinking on the topic. More to the point, women run 'game' on men, pretty much all the time. I got tha…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:28 PM
4

yup colour me curious on this one. Because aside from birthing and divorcing, none come to mind. Perhaps its the frame of references I have to hand readily, so perhaps this OP will assist us. I look forward to correction.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:14 PM
1

What else do you call feminism and modern universities?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:56 PM
1

It also occurs that perhaps they don't have the patriarchy we keep being told muslims are/do.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:54 PM
46

I suspect something much more sinister may be at foot. If our mainstream media is starting to portray masculinity. In some cases specifically white masculinity as the source of terror. They do seem to be trying to twist the narrative that way. We could be looking at what will look like the government responding to 'reasonable calls from the media, the people' when they start to use some of these extreme response laws and loopholes for human rights laws that they have been doing over the past dec…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:26 PM
1

This is where our governments are turned against us.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:21 PM
2

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/oxford-takeaway-exam-to-help-women-get-firsts-0v0056k8l couldn't you have just given the link to the online article?.... edit .... nvm ... times is pay wall.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:19 PM
36

Gloating that men are worse, weaker, less valuable than women, on a subject that highlights the sheer extent, range and depth that chivalry and the underlying drives in men that made chivalry gave to them. Thus making them stronger more valuable and us, lesser. The same game, essentially, of a narcissistic child still vying for parental attention in a sibling rivalry. Which makes me wonder, is there something damaging their brains at a very young age? Is that why they are stuck in this insane an…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:52 AM
18

Cunt isn't enough. But to sum down to a one four letter word, it's a good starting point.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 08:53 AM
2

Turns out american culture isn't swedish and that needs changing because she's a xenophobe. Feminism provides her with instant back up for the specific areas she wants addressed. Maybe I missed something I just whipped through it really. But it was difficult separating the women aren't on a high enough pedestal issue she had with her issues that america isn't sweden.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:53 AM
1

If you would vote for the EU you might as well for vote the womens equality party to lead the country. We'd also be voting to make democracy a pointless 4 year media event where voting doesn't count for shit.... I find that last point extremely odd as a thing for people to vote for. The draft with no vote.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:30 AM
74

Jesus what an arrogant and hateful woman. What sick twisted woman.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:12 AM
17

If it wasn't for the point she is working to end our culture and civilisation it would be funny.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 06:00 PM
1

Looking at that, just before or shortly after there was a move to get more women working, had sufficient house work devices been invented and distributed among the population that women started to get so much free time that it was essentially just making them bored, making them actually predisposed to arguments that put them to work?. Or to what extent that was a factor. Just an odd thought.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:58 PM
2

She had the balls to say it. Publish it too. Then to take that roasting and defend herself with confidence. Whatever else she has or will be, hats off to her for that. Something like that, against the feminist machine has ended careers before and lives before. God knows what price she paid for that in the end. it is a factor to remember. But long and short that clip pretty much under scores the title pretty neatly.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:25 PM
6

Well either leave, or I hope you are into, well, being demeaned in the relationship, to her friends, to your co workers and friends, sexually because those nut bags can be seriously abusive.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:31 PM
6

As a person she is quite engaging, intelligent, sharp etc. Quite an animated, expressive speaker too. But she insists on being a feminist. Then insists her feminism, is essentially the correct feminism, but never quite gets round to admitting or accepting that calling it and centring it on fem in the first place is what is wrong with all the bad feminists she decries. I usually find my self perplexed by her as most of what her feminism is was just the way people used to be ... and they never fel…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:48 PM
5

Yup. Women are wonderful.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:33 PM
1

Many many women are fed up of the feminist BS, however to varying degrees they are pretty much all of them indoctrinated by feminism to differing extents - meaning on that alone they can have some dissonant hate towards men from that. That is to say, many are not aware they have been to taught to hate men, some so much that they can be hating on you whilst claiming to love you. Then there is gynocentrism itself which drives them to hoover up feminist teachings in the first place. I think the num…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:45 AM
2

Any one considered pointing out that every woman there is a classic for freuds penis envy?
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:21 AM
136

Except it still is... mimicry from a kid and 'role model' is normal. Genetic similarity not always so much.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:33 AM
1

Think they did try in the UK or maybe Australia there was talk about being forced to take hugs and kisses from aunts uncles etc ... Not sure what happened to all that...
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:02 AM
7

Thing is they pretty much have done that. So many women are now 'infected' with feminist ideology that this is the situation and they can't be told. Because they 'aren't feminists'.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:01 AM
4

I read the top few lines. I read the bottom few lines. I involuntarily stuck my middle finger up. My subconscious isn't even bothering to wait for my mind to catch up.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:21 PM
5

and now comes the 'learning about feminists' stage of red pilling. She claims that already happened ... now it really will.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:22 PM
1

You are in the contempt eventuating in divorce spiral. She is now using divorce and her lack of care if it happens as a mace with which to beat you down. At this point, the question is how badly beaten down will you be before that happens and you can no longer take it, or she becomes bored with her sadism and wants something else. .. but then I can be a bit 'negative', cynical etc ... I want to be wrong, if that helps. ... I'd say divorce now, it'll fuck you bad. But not as bad as both the head …
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:43 AM
20

That, firstly the needs of women are dominant vs the needs of men, and that secondly, to extend them so far over the needs of men, mothers, by and large, and in actual impact on the world, hate their sons.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:39 PM
2

It might be. What are they campaigning for, an end to womens acting careers? Should women not depict women?
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:27 AM
3

"a trusted adult", Words like that would be why I never did as a kid.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter