TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

asklepios7 Archive

View 8 posts and 90 comments by asklepios7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

They want to preserve the narrative that women are uniquely victimized and oppressed—primarily by men—because they believe that acknowledging men’s issues would divert attention and resources away from women’s concerns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/26 07:45 AM
8

It’s an archive link to a Reddit post i made about biphobia against men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 07:14 PM
5

https://archive.ph/i43gF
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 05:38 PM
1

The argument is sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 09:39 AM
3

Suzanne Osman (2011) examined how empathy toward a hypothetical rape victim and perpetrator varies by the gender of the victim, perpetrator, and participant, as well as by participants’ prior experiences with sexual aggression, and found that, in general, there’s significantly more empathy towards female rapists than male rapists, less empathy for the victims of female rapists, especially when those rape victims were male, and more empathy for female victims than male victims by both women (irre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/26 10:02 PM
-4

In most research, women score higher in empathy.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 12:45 AM
4

It’s counterintuitive in the societal sense. The authors correctly predicted the outcomes in both studies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 09:30 PM
1

Men overwhelmingly build and maintain much of society’s critical infrastructure, make major scientific discoveries, and drive technological advancement. Without men’s labor, civilization would grind to a halt. Why should anyone be ashamed of that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 03:13 PM
37

Share this. People like to pretend like society prioritizes men’s wellbeing over women’s when clearly the opposite’s the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 06:49 AM
30

They minimize men’s issues because they believe discussing them would detract from women’s issues, and, to some extent, it would. We have only a finite amount of time, energy, and resources to devote to any given cause, so focusing more on men’s issues necessarily means focusing less on women’s issues. They cannot afford to lose control of the narrative that women are uniquely and exclusively oppressed, because maintaining a monopoly on victimhood allows them to avoid sharing that time, energy, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 07:35 AM
3

I mentioned that. Read the whole thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 12:06 AM
21

Not a lot of people know this but the single-most targeted demographic in war are fighting-aged male non-combatants (ages 15-55). Genocide researcher Adam Jones describes male civilians who haven’t taken up arms as the ones targeted most by opposing militaries (3/31). They are the group perceived as posing the greatest danger to an opposing force and so are killed en masse (9/31). While the deaths of women and children is considered revolting, the deaths of fighting-aged males is considered fair…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 09:06 PM
1

1 at 20 is fine
/r/RedPillWomen02/07/26 01:07 PM
1

If it’s in the single digits and from relationships, most men don’t care.
/r/RedPillWomen02/07/26 01:07 PM
11

It also doesn’t help that feminist activists in Israel and India are rallying against gender neutral rape law that can potentially result in female sexual predators getting charged, with one feminist activist literally saying, “Put simply: unlike in existing law where the accused is male, the Committee recommendations if enacted into a proposed new Bill, will make it possible for women to be charged with these offences. This is wholly unacceptable..” The Indian Express: Gender neutral rape law? …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 11:48 AM
21

https://archive.ph/vUnab https://archive.ph/KE99T
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 08:06 AM
6

Don’t you resent this quick-to-ban-dissenting-opinions atmosphere that this site has cultivated? Why propagate it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/26 08:30 AM
1

Just because insecure people get weirded out about humans having a romantic and sexual life before them That’s a mischaracterization. Most people want their parents to have prior sexual and relationship experience, and, in fact, women are less likely than men to date someone that lacks that. https://archive.ph/vUnab Both men and women are disinclined to date individuals with extensive histories of casual sex because they’re more likely to stray in monogamous, sexually-exclusive relationships.
/r/ExRedPill14/02/26 03:42 AM
1

If you won’t accept self-report, what are you basing the idea that only guys care about this shit on?
/r/ExRedPill14/02/26 03:29 AM
1

Let’s be clear. You are the one that is willing to lie and deny when it comes to the science of these things.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 11:47 PM
1

In his 2024 article “Why We Care About a Partner's Sexual History”, Andrew G. Thomas, a senior lecturer of psychology at Swansea University in UK, wrote: “Someone who seeks and seems to enjoy casual sex may be less likely to want to forgo that for a long-term relationship, or may even struggle to do so if they tried… And even if one was able to get a committed relationship off the ground, those who show a propensity towards casual sex may have found themselves more tempted to slip into bad habit…
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 11:45 PM
1

Read this. This is what the experts say. https://archive.ph/MWV5d#:~:text=What%20the%20experts,be%20more%20difficult
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 11:41 PM
1

They’re laughable because the results upset you. You’re not even equipped to engage with and critically evaluate them.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 10:00 PM
0

They all say that men and women prefer partners with moderate, not extensive histories. You’re simply lying because you prioritize ideology over reality. Importantly, moderate (not extremely low or high) sexual activity was rated most favorably in both genders, suggesting similar and curvilinear intragender trajectories. (1/12) Study link Weber, M., & Friese, M. (2024). Sexual (double) standards revisited: Similarities and differences in the societal evaluation of male and female sexuality. Soci…
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 09:14 PM
0

Read the studies. No amount of studies will ever convince you that you’re wrong but read them anyways.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 07:25 AM
1

Caring isn’t illogical. Not caring is. You’re denying science in favor of your dumb ideology.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 06:09 AM
0

The expert consensus is that both men and women possess this preference. Studies have consistently shown that women, like men, prefer partners with moderate rather than extensive sexual histories. Lucia O’Sullivan, professor of psychology at the University of New Brunswick, wrote in 2018, “Highly experienced men typically are rated as negatively as highly experienced women, even though we generally expect that women will fare worse than will men in the judgment game. This convergence in our dist…
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 04:39 AM
1

Studies have consistently shown that a higher number and/or permissive sexual attitudes is related to infidelity and relationship dissatisfaction/instability. Women find men who sleep around to be undesirable long-term partners too. No amount of studies will convince you of this however because you don’t want it to be true. . Study: Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce (Journal of Family Issues, 2024) The key results here are mostly consistent across models: those with the hi…
/r/ExRedPill13/02/26 04:37 AM
2

2014, more obese women https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/11/13/455883665/cdc-more-women-than-men-are-obese-in-america-and-gap-is-widening 2017-2018, no significant differences https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm 2021-2023, no significant difference https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm 2023 study, higher obesity in men, higher fat content in women https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859324/pdf/40618_2023_Article_2196.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:36 AM
1

Promiscuous women successfully shamed men at a societal level into disregarding their histories when it comes to committed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 08:27 PM
96

Nah. You don’t get to decry that shit when it happens to women and applaud that shit when it happens to men. If you’re making exceptions, I’ll make exceptions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 08:09 PM
15

A lot of feminist men and women don’t want equality or the application of equal standards. They’re fine with double standards and disparities that disfavor men, like inequality before the law (differential arrest and prosecution rates, sentencing disparities, etc.) and male under-representation in higher education. Hell, just in terms of expressed sexism, they’re fine with sexist generalizations when they’re aimed at men, they’re fine with body-shaming men, etc. They’re fine with affirmative act…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 06:33 PM
8

Men shame women for sleeping around. Women will shame men for sexual inactivity. What’s annoying is that women think that they shouldn’t be shamed for their sexual frequency while not really applying that same courtesy to men. Women are generally fine with double standards so long as they benefit from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 07:18 PM
1

Because he was black.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 11:36 AM
15

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsbl/article/20/11/20240381/63537/A-feminine-advantage-in-the-domain-of-harm-a Some theories as to why we prioritize women’s lives over men’s. The womb is the limiting factor to reproduction in societies, so it made sense to preserve women while treating men as more expendable. Another is that we view men as perpetrators of harm and women as passive recipients or victims of it and are thus more sensitive to women’s suffering. A third is that we view women as le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 06:20 PM
93

Because people value women’s lives more. There was actually an experiment where they asked participants if they’d rather sacrifice the life of a male bystander or female bystander for the greater good. 88% chose to sacrifice the male bystander. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1948550616647448?download=true Co-author Dean Mobbs, professor of cognitive neuroscience at CalTech (and formerly an assistant professor of psychology at Columbia University), was quoted saying, "There is indee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 04:02 PM
40

To maintain the narrative that oppression and victimhood only flow in one direction, acknowledging that men also face systemic issues would disrupt the monopoly on victimhood. Since our attention and resources are limited, this recognition could divert some of them toward men, which is intolerable to those with zero-sum mentalities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 01:17 PM
0

Body count matters
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:57 PM
2

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 06:34 AM
18

It’s more accurate to say that most guys aren’t into women who sleep around casually.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 05:29 AM
85

Interesting thing about misandry, which supposedly isn’t systemic, is how socially permissible it is. You can make insane over-generalizations about men, calling them stupid, violent, creepy, weird, toxic, what have you, and there are no social or professional repercussions aside from meek objections from men’s activists, who are disregarded by everyone else. Exercise its counterpart and you will instantly be fired, shunned, publicly condemned and potentially assaulted. Which do you think more e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/25 10:04 AM
5

It’s a clever tactic. Anyone with legitimate criticism of the movement can easily be dismissed as a misogynist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 11:40 PM
26

Not all. Women are far less forgiving when it comes to past same-sex experiences and sexual inexperience. There’s a pattern here, which is when women do a thing it’s not their fault or not a problem but when men do it it’s bad/worse. This applies to sexist generalizations where it’s only bad when done to women. It applies to discrimination based on past sexual experiences. It applies to huge age gaps, where women won’t criticize other women who date men significantly younger than themselves like…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 09:45 PM
11

You might find this interesting: https://archive.ph/C9Lih
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 09:32 PM
2

One, you can never be assured to get an honest answer. Not all women are dishonest whores who lie in their own interest. And what’s more important is sussing out whether they’ve had a hoe phase where they casuallly slept around with randos. Two, what are you going to do with the information? "Aww shucks, she had 8 past partners instead of 7, can't be with her!" Where's the cutoff, and why? I get told that she’s slept with 15-50 guys and I’m perfectly comfortable with walking away. That’s why I a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 07:13 AM
1

No one deserves anything in the dating realm. Notions of entitlement is dangerous when it comes to voluntary relationships that require mutual consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 07:03 AM
1

Which is akin to entitled incels making demands about others adjusting their preferences to include them. We live in a society where female entitlement within the realm of sex, love, and relationships is well-received while expressed male entitlement to the same is met with derision. Women deserve sex and relationships; men should be happy with what they get. Men who aren’t interested in hoes are bad and do not get to have the luxury of preferences for a partner. Plenty of women who exhibit thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 07:01 AM
2

A lot of feminism boils down to “fine when women do it; bad when men do it.” It’s literally a movement that seeks to justify double standards so long as they’re in women’s interests. It’s why there needs to be a parallel men’s movement because feminism promotes gender inequality that favors women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 06:27 AM
3

Then I shall die alone. I promise you the hoe will be happier with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:47 PM
4

1 boyfriend a year for 13 I’m going to let you figure out how this is problematic on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:38 PM
4

I want to know to avoid the hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:33 PM
3

I’d just mention that I don’t casually sleep around, confining sex to committed relationships, and will ask if they have a similar history and values.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:33 PM
3

Studies have consistently shown that a higher number and/or permissive sexual attitudes is related to infidelity and relationship dissatisfaction/instability. . Study: Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce (Journal of Family Issues, 2024) The key results here are mostly consistent across models: those with the highest number of premarital sexual partners as of Wave III (nine or more) have about triple the odds of divorce compared to those with none (ORs = 2.65—3.20). Notably, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:15 PM
2

High bc women are prone to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 10:57 PM
8

Studies have consistently shown that a higher number and/or permissive sexual attitudes is related to infidelity and relationship dissatisfaction/instability. . Study: Re-Examining the Link Between Premarital Sex and Divorce (Journal of Family Issues, 2024) The key results here are mostly consistent across models: those with the highest number of premarital sexual partners as of Wave III (nine or more) have about triple the odds of divorce compared to those with none (ORs = 2.65—3.20). Notably, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 10:54 PM
1

Let’s just be friends, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:39 AM
1

If I used AI to help me polish these summaries, what would that prove? Are the summaries incorrect? I literally have the specific pages and excerpts highlighted as in-line citations. I also include PDFs so you can see if I did them justice. Each of these summaries took between 30-45 minutes to write and hyperlink, and I finished this on and off over the span of months as just a pet project. So what if I used AI assistance? That’s literally how it’s meant to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:36 AM
1

No. I read, summarized, highlighted, and excerpted 50+ academic studies, scholarly reviews, and social science reports just to prove that ideologues like yourself who deny science are being contradicted by the expert consensus. https://archive.ph/MWV5d And while you’re right that a narrative review isn’t necessarily systematic (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/narrative-review), the Fincham and May review is systematic. Let me be clear: if you’re the usual sex-positive progressive…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:00 AM
1

Systematic reviews are at the pinnacle. Here are a few: REVIEW: In their report “Predictors of infidelity among couples”, Belu and O’Sullivan (2024) (PDF) identify a greater motivation and willingness to engage in casual, uncommitted sex (i.e., an unrestricted sociosexual orientation) as an individual predictor of infidelity, though this association may largely be explained by lower relationship commitment and greater attention to alternative partners (pg.270). REVIEW: A narrative review by Roka…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:39 AM
3

Yes, all of them. The expert consensus is that both sexes care, but feminists only think that having preferences is wrong when men possess them. . Weber, M., & Friese, M. (2024). Sexual (Double) Standards Revisited: Similarities and Differences in the Societal Evaluation of Male and Female Sexuality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241237288 . Busch, T.M., Saldala-Torres, P. The Impact of Sexual History and Relationship Type on Social Perceptio…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:10 AM
1

Hard not to be when you’re competing against dozens of dudes, and especially when they moved on because they knew they could do better and you’re the sap who stuck with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:53 AM
1

Here are fifty peer-reviewed studies and scholarly reviews that found that past promiscuity is a strong predictor of future infidelity and divorce: https://archive.ph/MWV5d
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:39 AM
1

…that doesn’t follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:36 AM
3

Here are fifty peer-reviewed studies and scholarly reviews that found that past promiscuity is a strong predictor of future infidelity and divorce: https://archive.ph/MWV5d
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:32 AM
2

Here are fifty peer-reviewed studies and scholarly reviews that found that past promiscuity is a strong predictor of future infidelity and divorce: https://archive.ph/MWV5d You’re literally fighting the expert consensus.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:30 AM
1

It’s not trashy to not want to date someone that’s casually slept around.
/r/RedPillWomen20/11/25 06:09 AM
1

She told him she was only with 7 and he was already shocked/upset. What a horrible person.
/r/RedPillWomen20/11/25 06:02 AM
2

Honestly, this sociopathic tendency that women have, where they encourage other women to misrepresent themselves to avoid rejection, is why I now just advise men to lie to women. Y’all don’t deserve honesty. Why should you get the truth when we only receive lies in return.
/r/RedPillWomen20/11/25 06:00 AM
36

They don’t want to surrender their Monopoly on Victimhood (MoV). Men are perpetual offenders and women are perpetual victims. Why do you think so many feminists freaked out when Jonny Depp won his case? They were afraid that they’d lose that narrative. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/advocates-fear-depp-heard-trial-will-have-a-chilling-effect-on-women-coming-forward-with-abuse-claims https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/01/amber-heard-johnny-depp-trial-metoo-backlash https:…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 10:26 PM
1

On this site, people can openly say things like “all men are predators, trash, worthless,” and that is accepted. Now imagine someone made the same kind of sweeping generalization about black people being criminals. That would be condemned as bigotry, and rightly so. Reddit will ban users for saying similar things about women, but for some reason you can tar all men as bad and still skirt the content policy against hate speech.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/08/25 06:23 AM
1

Progressives tend to uphold the idea of oppression hierarchies, in which groups are categorized as either privileged or oppressed. Privileged groups are seen to include white people, men, heterosexuals, and cisgender individuals, while oppressed groups include people of color, women, homosexuals, and transgender individuals. Complaints about prejudice from those in a “privileged” group are often dismissed or met with hostility. In particular, in the cultural climate shaped by #MeToo and the i-l …
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 02:37 PM
11

They’re even more hateful towards men than r_mgtow was to women.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/25 01:58 AM
1

Better than marrying trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:09 AM
2

True. Check out this post. https://archive.ph/mHURO
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:57 AM
5

I know that it’s popular among women to encourage each other to lie. I also know that women encourage other women to shun men who ask about or care about their pasts. In effect, men are penalized for having preferences when it comes to the pasts of prospective partners. If that’s the case, then yes, I think it’s perfectly okay for men to similarly lie and misrepresent themselves. If the current zeitgeist only penalizes men for caring about sexual history—and not women—then I don’t see a problem …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:49 PM
5

Men can, should and already do lie, just like how women lie about the number of guys they’ve had sex with. I have a friend who’s had sex with dozens of prostitutes as he’s lived in Germany for a few years and he straight up lied to his girlfriend that he doesn’t do that. If the past shouldn’t matter, then that applies to both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:06 PM
10

A gossip network for men about women ostensibly to warn about goldiggers and emotional abusers would be highly inappropriate, and there’s no difference here. Make one anyways. Either all of it’s okay or none of it is. And if it gets taken down (which it will), then it simply proves that we’re willing to tolerate baseless and anonymous claims being made against men but not women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 02:16 AM
9

https://archive.ph/2uO8i#:~:text=Deanna%E2%80%99s%20comments,each%20person%E2%80%99s%20background.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 02:13 AM
19

Make a counterpart app for men and see how quickly it’s taken down and derided as misogynistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 02:09 AM
2

Women in their 20s and older are generally unwilling to date or have sex with men who have had fewer than 1–2 partners. Kinsey Institute researchers Dr. Justin Garcia and Dr. Helen Fischer conducted their annual Singles in America Study, a comprehensive study based on the attitudes and behaviors taken from a nationally representative sample of over six thousand participants. They found that 51% of women (compared to 33% of men) wouldn’t date a virgin. Anderson & Surbey (2014) (PDF) explored whet…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:37 AM
4

They don’t want equality.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 02:02 AM

Women are far better at coordinating than men. Within a few years, they’ve started an anti age gap movement where even a 29yo dating a 21yo is now considered predatory. Now men can screen out women who’ve slept around as asking for histories is taboo. Men aren’t united. Women are united.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:07 PM

Progressives and lefties constantly ban those with non-kosher viewpoints from online platforms.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:41 PM

Low n count women are significantly less likely to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:48 AM

Seven decades of research have consistently replicated the link between a higher number of lifetime sexual partners or permissive sexual attitudes and negative relationship outcomes, such as infidelity, relationship instability, dissatisfaction, and dissolution (Smith & Wolfinger, 2024; Vowels, Vowels, & Mark, 2022; Buss & Schmitt, 2019; Jackson et al., 2019; McNulty et al., 2018; Fincham & May, 2017; Regnerus, 2017; Pinto & Arantes, 2017; Buss, 2016; Martins et al., 2016; Price, Pound, & Scott,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:43 AM

Men and women care, and women are far more scrutinizing of sexual history than men. Past research has shown that women and men preferred partners with moderate, not extensive sexual histories (Jacoby and Williams, 1985; O'Sullivan, 1995; Sprecher et al., 1997; Marks and Fraley, 2005; Allison and Risman, 2013; Armstrong & Riessing, 2014; Jones, 2016; Stewart-Williams, Butler, and Thomas, 2017). . Zhana Vrangalova (2016), sex researcher and adjunct professor of psychology at New York University, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:40 AM
2

Seven decades of research have consistently replicated the link between a higher number of lifetime sexual partners or permissive sexual attitudes and negative relationship outcomes, such as infidelity, relationship instability, dissatisfaction, and dissolution (Smith & Wolfinger, 2024; Vowels, Vowels, & Mark, 2022; Buss & Schmitt, 2019; Jackson et al., 2019; McNulty et al., 2018; Fincham & May, 2017; Regnerus, 2017; Pinto & Arantes, 2017; Buss, 2016; Martins et al., 2016; Price, Pound, & Scott,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:39 AM
1

I feel like when you say that women should screen out guys who are concerned about sexual history, you’re suggesting that men shouldn’t be concerned in the first place, but if you don’t want to engage whatever. You seem blunt and honest, which I like in a person, and I wanted your honest opinion on this hypothetical, armed with the knowledge of what that kind of lifestyle has been linked to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 04:12 AM

You were saying that women should screen out men who were concerned about that, but if you’re not interested in replying whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 04:02 AM

Do me a favor and give this research summary an open-minded read—it’ll take all of five minutes. Now, picture a distant future where your hypothetical son has lived a life much like your own—valuing committed, long-term relationships and reserving sex for those bonds. He’s now considering a serious relationship with a woman whose lifestyle has been the complete opposite: she’s had dozens of casual sexual partners—say, around 80—as a result of urban living. Would you feel comfortable with that? O…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 03:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter