TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

atanok Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by atanok on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Homocide victims? People killed by someone of the same sex?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:20 AM
1

Patriarchy is a stupid word for that. Can't they find a word that makes a modicum of sense? How about genderism?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 10:53 PM
2

That still doesn't make sense. It doesn't say she was doxxed anywhere but in your comment. Doxxing and ddos attacks have nothing to do with one another. Also, fuck that misusage of the work "hacking."
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:25 PM
1

They have nothing in common. A DDOS attack is a swarm of requests to an online service by a number of computers to make it exhaust its resources, causing it to stop serving legitimate requests. DDOS = Distributed Denial of Service Doxxing is the act of getting detailed personal information about a person, to enable personal harassment. Doxxing's root word is "docs" for documents.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:20 PM
1

So, just like a braindead person, except orders of magnitude less complex and with pretty much no personal history.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:54 AM
2

Oh, sorry, I must've misread your comment. I thought you had referred to the driver as a male, but you didn't. My bad.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:26 PM
2

The title is misleading in that it implies that the accusation of him being a "pervert" amounted to anything. There's no evidence of any misbehavior on the part of authorities, which seem to only have paid passing mention to the claim in what appears to be a standard interrogation to get his statement on the whole ordeal, as a witness and someone who gave first aid assistance. I imagine the whole exchange went something like this: "By the way, it says here on the report that the driver said you …
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:22 PM
1

Bus driver? Guy? Where did you get that from?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:18 AM
1

The thing is you need to remove the bra as well, which may seem unnecessary to someone uneducated about AEDs. Bras may contain conductive metal wires, in which case they pose a real threat when using an AED.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:16 AM
1

The proper thing to do is to do exactly what the man did. He didn't get any trouble for the vacuous claim and was offered recognition for his act. The title and beginning of the article are misleading.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:32 PM
5

I believe it was all part of a follow-up interrogation on the incident, and the molestation claim was just something that was on the report and was quickly dismissed. I don't think the authorities paid any unwarranted attention to the claim, and the man wasn't harassed about it. This is being blown out of proportion. Don't spend outrage where it's not due.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:29 PM
3

Note that the "retard" in this case was the person driving the car that had the accident, and the woman was his/her passenger, presumably someone close. I'm certain that there were many emotions at work in the situation. The authorities naturally paid no mind to the accusation, given the circumstances.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:20 PM
3

politically gay communities wut
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:13 PM
5

The gender of the driver was not mentioned anywhere in the article, and I can't really guess either way.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:06 PM
49

Hijacking top comment for article summary, due to misleading title Traffic accident Driver not severely injured, but a passenger woman was unconscious Passerby (man) checks on her; no pulse Man starts CPR AED kit brought in from a nearby store Man uses scissors from the kit to cut through her clothing to apply AED Man is asked to stop cutting by the driver and is called a pervert (hentai) Finishes cutting and applies AED, which ends up saving the woman Driver reports man as a sexual molester (ch…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:47 PM
0

This isn't a lighthearted joke. This is a hedonistic power trip.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:05 AM
7

apologises for typo in title "i know its ads..."
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:01 AM
5

She didn't intend to admit it publicly. She was being secretly recorded when she verbally admitted to it.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:41 AM
36

So, you're saying you vote turd sandwich instead of giant douche?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:27 PM
3

It's also ingrained in some cultures' aesthetics, notably the US, where the general image of a "normal penis" is a circumcised one, and both parents and individuals may choose to perform it on their children or themselves in hopes of being more readily accepted, and not scaring anyone off for having a "gross, alien-looking, uncircumcised penis." They have it backwards, you see. They see it as a matter of having an "uncircumcised penis" or a "normal penis", as if not being circumcised were the un…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:30 AM
4

Don't get me started on the Misanthropic Entities' Coalition, though. Damned splitters.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:09 AM
30

How unambitious. Just reduce the human population by 100% and there will be no problems at all!
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:23 AM
2

Nurturing sounds good and neutral.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:42 AM
7

Actually, it's the 58th century for them. The fact that it's based on what they believe to be the age of the Earth should be enlightening by itself.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:59 PM
1

OP said it was posted on a public, anonymous, city-wide forum, so I'm assuming a whole bunch of people saw it because of that.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:52 AM
4

Those are the children she would be getting after marrying him, but that he's allegedly failed to help her produce. She speaks as if she picked him merely as a means to reproduce and care for her offspring. I don't get this irrational urge to reproduce, especially for someone this young. I'm assuming it's due to some form of conditioning.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:47 AM
2

There are no downvotes on Facebook to make up for the lunatics. Or so I've heard. I don't use Facebook.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:40 AM
2

It's normally an erogenous zone for women and not men, physiologically. But the taboo is absolutely a cultural issue, and doesn't make any objective sense.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:43 PM
1

It'd be cruel to leave children with the parent that's more likely to just up and die on then. Sounds legit. /s
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:37 PM
6

I believe the word for this is "spay." But then again, if they meant removing sex bias, they would have said "neutering." They only care about masculine sex bias though.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:15 AM
1

What's your take on PMCs, then? Do mercenaries put their company before themselves, too?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:03 AM
18

Can you give us explicit examples of what he says, under what circumstances and with what kind of tone? Sounds to me like he's ripping on you affectionately as good friends do, but I'd like to understand how those people came to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:56 AM
3

Seeing stuff like this makes me sick... This part of the questionnaire should make use of your previous answers regarding your gender and only show the appropriate answer subset! Geez, web designers. Get it together. I'm joking, of course. In my country, Portugal, there is still a one-day event by the armed forces that only boys are forced to attend when they come of age. It's mostly a promotion of the armed forces as a career. At the end of the day, we get a paper that is indispensable for a ma…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:34 PM
7

Where did the "pony loving mangina" come from? I don't see how it fits into this. It just feels random. Full disclosure: I love ponies.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:19 PM
1

I don't think you got what I was trying to say. The point is that many parents are going to get their children circumcised wether we allow it or not. Giving the option to perform it in a hospital with the experience and supervision of professionals is in the best interests of the children, who would otherwise have it done in precarious conditions with vastly increased chances of a botched procedure and further complications. The problem with this approach is that it may increase the number of ci…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:13 AM
0

It's a sensible decision that has the well-being of the patient in mind, much like the legalization of abortion even if you don't agree with it, in that it prevents the procedure from happening anyway in unsanitary conditions under incompetent and unequipped practitioners. There should be barriers to dissuade misinformed parents, though. Some forced education about the subject and grim-looking release forms would be in order, for starters. The long-term goal should still be the complete eradicat…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:43 PM
2

By the way, FGM stands for female genital mutilation. I find it somewhat offensive that emphasis is put on "female," but I understand trying to make people care about it more by distantiating the issue from a similar practice that's socially accepted in our societies. I also understand that FGM is typically more damaging than MGM, but all genital mutilation should be unanimously abhorred regardless of gender or method. It's one of those issues where many good people find it adequate to focus on …
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:29 PM
0

Classic NASCAR degenerate redneck bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:44 AM
1

Perhaps in Montreal they don't subscribe to prison as a punishment, and prefer going the rehabilitation route when possible? I dunno. Have there been any other cases like this? It sounds like quite the oddity.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:59 PM
1

The minors end up getting a sizable share of punishment. Being in one of those cases must be degrading even as a victim that doesn't regret their part in the affair. I can't say that's a good thing, though.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:52 PM
1

The teenager told his friends about the sex, and soon after rumours of the activities reached the school, which initiated an investigation, leading to the teacher’s resignation. Not long after, the boy went to police. At first I was under the impression that he bragged about it to his friends whilst still in the relationship and they were caught because rumours spread, forcing him to go to the police to save face before his parents. Now I wonder what really happened; did he talk to his friends a…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:33 PM
1

Yeah, his reputation amongst his peers was probably affected negatively by the case, and some potential partners will probably cite it and be demeaning about it. Kids are cruel and they'll always find a way to turn any "big deal" against others. My point was that the relationship itself seemed to be very much to his liking. The article states that he sought out and initiated some of the encounters himself. I wonder if it would've been possible at all for them to end their relationship without it…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:27 PM
4

After reading carefully through the article you posted, I found something I consider even more heinous than the actual sex offense. The girl killed herself two years after the incident, and everything seems to indicate that it happened as a result of the way everyone around her treated her since the case came to light. >"A teenager's whole life is about school and their friends, and he turned everyone against her." Fuck everyone who devalues and shames women* based on a "tarnished" sexual histor…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:09 PM
3

I think you're right: the two cases are similar. All we can conclude, though, is that there are instances of inconspicuously low sentences awarded for heterosexual statutory rape of minors perpetrated by both sexes. And they both kind of make sense if you accept the mainstream rhetoric that prison sentences are of a purely punitive nature. The lowered sentences adjust for the fact that society already presents very harsh punishments to the offenders in their life outside prison, compared to perp…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:42 PM
4

Why do you say that? Unless the post was substantially edited since your post, I don't find anything unreasonable about it.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:28 PM
2

If I understood correctly, the boy was reciprocal to her advances and did everything willingly. It was statutory rape, not actual rape. There's a big difference there. The 15yo she targeted was both sexually mature, so viable as a partner, and inferior to her in authority and life experience, so less threatening to her on an emotional and social level. A perfect target in her allegedly low self-esteem state. Also, you should be aware that it's not unnatural or uncommon to feel sexually attracted…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:18 PM
-2

This comes as no surprise. Girls can't possibly compete when they're all busy being pregnant from all the rape in our Patriarcal Rape Society. /s
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:22 PM
7

In no particular order.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:14 PM
4

So, you're a fanatic because he shunned you for having a different view? Sounds a like victim blaming.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:44 PM
12

The only issue I could derive from this situation is that if the adult character were a male, he'd be perceived as a "pedophile" and a sexual predator. That being said, I find nothing wrong in this film's purported premise. I wish that the negative prejudice towards adult men be done with, not that it be applied to adult women as well; that would be a step back.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:03 AM
6

>EA employs far more men than women, and that is "an issue to fix." No, an issue would be lowering the standards for one particular sex in order to "balance it out." Not favoring women over men is not being sexist just because you ended up with more men by being impartial. Having a 50-50 policy is blatant sexism in the hope of not being sexist.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:37 AM
3

Replying from phone while travelling. I meant dichotomy as "either men have problems OR women have problems."
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:49 PM
8

Sexism can be perpetrated by either gender towards either gender. Her problem would not be invalidated if it originated exclusively from women, and feminism does not always boil down to just anti-male rethoric. That would be a strawman.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:40 PM
5

The problem is that she is comfronted with a dismissal of her intellectual ambition because in such a woman that's regarded as inherently less valuable than her physical attractiveness. What needs to be understood here is that there is no dicotomy between men's problems and women's. They both exist and should be addressed. Mutual dismissal of each other's problems helps no one.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:30 PM
4

So, if we're in agreement that it is a bullshit argument, we should not be hypocritical and accept it just because it's being used to discredit feminism. That was my point.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:09 PM
10

Beg to differ. The image does carry a message that employs some formal reasoning. I would boil it down into words as follows: Woman A claims to have a problem. Woman B shows signs of having a problem many orders of magnitude greater than that of Woman A. Therefore, Woman A's problem should be ignored. The best name I have for this fallacy is appeal to worse problems. The Wikipedia article doesn't cite any sources, and I believe it is wrong when it says that the problems must be unrelated, so I w…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:43 AM
27

Agreed. I hope everyone who realizes this does their part. Besides, it's nothing but fallacious reasoning. The lesser of two evils is still evil. I think it's a perfectly reasonable complaint, too. Telling a woman that she shouldn't pursue higher level accomplishments because she is expected to exploit her good looks sounds like the kind of thing we could do without in our society.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:37 AM
2

You forgot the /s... right?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:53 AM
0

Women are the expendable sex. Dangerous jobs just happen to be a part of male privilege. /s
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:12 AM
1

I sure hope they don't. One less mental health problem in the gene pool.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:06 AM
1

The man-hate had no intrinsic irony to point out, perhaps?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:04 AM
2

Tomorrow on factcheckme: I was literally raped by Gamerp4's words and it would only be fair for every male organism on the planet to writhe in pain and die as result of this event.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:58 AM
2

Look at the comments. It's for real.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:52 AM
1

Maybe it's adjusted for population? If there are a similar number of reported incidents but a much smaller female population, I can see how women have a much higher incidence rate. I honestly can't say I'd be surprised if that were the case. In any case, I don't think it's fair to say "stop rape against women in the military" when you can just say "stop rape in the military," but I can understand how the former can gain traction more easily and will probably end up resulting in lower incidence r…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:55 PM
6

Men take the easy way out while women have to face the cold, harsh reality and raise their cowardly men's children like the incubators society expects them to be. There's always a way to spin it.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:00 AM
1

Please use the canonical Youtube URL of a video to avoid reposts.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 02:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter