TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

atlas720 Archive

View 0 posts and 87 comments by atlas720 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

They're talking about the wedding band a man wears, not the musical band playing at the reception.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 02:30 PM
2

Yeah that 1965 immigration act along with a couple amnesty's really did a number on the US.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 03:58 PM
0

it's stuff like this that makes me worried about whether or not you guys actually dress as well as you think you do. Ha! I was thinking the exact same thing. Lazily sitting here at my computer on a Saturday morning with jeans, shoes, under garments, and a t-shirt I'm wearing $1k worth of clothing.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 03:20 PM
1

Not sure how many times it has to be said for you to understand basic definitions. But here goes: A person who has sexual relations with someone of their same sex is a homosexual. Their age is inconsequential. The church dealt with a pedophile crisis which is in fact distinguishable from a homosexual crisis. A bunch of priests(males) "fucking little boys in the ass" is a homosexual crisis, not a pedophile crisis. Not really sure why this is so hard for you to grasp. Homosexuals found guilty of b…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:09 PM
1

I never made the claim that homosexuals and pedophiles are the same. You don't have to make the "claim" its already a given. Catholic priests(all males) "fucking little boys in the ass" are homosexuals. The catholic church most certainly covered up for pedophile priests. Homosexuals are a protected class of individuals, and the country does not honor freedom of association. When the church dealt with its homosexual crisis it had 2 options: 1)Purge their ranks of the homosexuals and deal with the…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 03:24 PM
1

Sure those priests that rape little boys could be called homosexuals Nice ninja edit there after I had already responded. Also, its not "could be" they are. You are the one who said that pedophilia and homosexuality are the same which is what this whole conversation is about Good attempt at a slight of hand, but no, this conversation is about priests sexually assaulting little boys which is makes them homosexuals: Why would I care what an organization who covers up for people who fuck little boy…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 12:11 AM
1

Every single instance of pedophilia by catholic priests was perpetrated on boys? Straw-man, a priest having relations with a boy(male) is a homosexual.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 11:03 PM
1

And where is it written that all pedophilia is perpetrated on members of the abuser's sex? Non sequitur. Catholics do not have female priests, only male priests. Those male priests had sexual relations with other (young)males. That makes them homosexuals.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 10:19 PM
2

What are you a fucking women? Nobody is this stupid. Homosexual[hoh-muh-sek-shoo-uh l or, esp. British, -seks-yoo-]: sexually attracted to members of one's own sex When a person has sexual relations with someone of their own sex, regardless whether its another man or a boy, they are a homosexual. I know, logic is hard, but do try and keep up.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 09:43 PM
2

Are you saying its not? Seriously dude, hetero normative men are not attracted to their same gender, only homosexuals are. Do you honestly think normal people do that shit?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 08:47 PM
3

Seriously dude, this is the third response in one fucking thread spewing the same exact level of ignorance. If anyone gets a near big a pass as females(pussy pass), its the lavender lobby.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 08:24 PM
2

Do you honestly think that the liberals in this country would allow such bad publicity to be aired against homosexuals?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 08:22 PM
1

“I don’t want to keep thinking about my biological clock,” said Nancy Noel, a 32-year-old nurse. “I’d rather store my eggs now while they are young and healthy and use them when I’m older, say around 39.” Is it even legal to take money from people this stupid? Even if the egg somehow made it 7 years(eggs severely diminish by 5 years, and are unusable at 7-10) her reproductive system would be so far gone by 39 that she may not even be able to take an fertilized egg anymore.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 12:06 AM
1

Is heightism mainly an American thing? Not sure if its really just America, or its just most pronounced here. Women will tend to judge you relative to the crowd that she finds you in. A 5'10" man in a bar where all the rest of the guys are hovering around 5'6"-5'8" is "tall". Here in the states we have a lot of different ethnicities all thrown together. You can be in a club with mostly southern European whites, blacks or hispanics and the heights will all be in the 5'6"-5'9" range. A guy that is…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 07:42 PM
1

It's usually top 20%
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 07:28 PM
1

6ft tall make up 15% of the US population and that percentage sinks hard by every inch ≥6ft is 15% ≥6ft 2in is 5% ≥6ft 4in is 1%
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 07:24 PM
2

6'4" master race checking in as well. Fist pump!
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 06:54 PM
2

Dude, if that scale was original I'd give you gold. Was worth the laugh.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 06:54 PM
1

It's good to hear you know your place. Now if others would just get on board, life would be a lot easier.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 06:53 PM
1

People lie, a lot. 6'4" myself, and I could of wrote this exact statement myself.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 06:52 PM
1

Our decline is directly proportional to how many betas there are to put up with this shit. Um, no. In 1964 America was made up of 92% whites. In 2014 America is made up of 62% whites. Our decline is directly relational to how fast whites are getting replaced in this country. The less white people you have, the less white culture you have.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 05:13 PM
4

Great summary. Enjoy the gold 8)
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 03:04 PM
2

Since your friend is a Christian, my advice to you is that you should feed him with his own authority. This, your friend probably has a very readers digest understanding of Christianity at best. Take a learning bible, and in the table of contents it'll point you to specific versus that deal with subject matters(husband/wife, head of household, etc)
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 05:16 PM
6

A huge part of religion is also following blindly without any explanation as to why you should follow. Your stupidity is showing. Try starting here it should be right around your level. Then maybe moving on to real work.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 05:13 PM
4

If you're not in the upper middle class or elite of society, born into it or not, just don't waste your fucking time with people out of your league (goes for your own gender). People who are in a better situation (and hot chicks who trade their looks for social mobility) literally look at you like some kind of parasite, they're not comfortable being near you because you're of different social class/success. Money quote right here. Advice to those who do work their way into the upper middle class…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 11:40 PM
4

With in the next 3-5 years a male "pill" and an artificial womb will hit the market. Females will be of no use at that point other than to keep as pets for amusement. For those thinking that a male sex robot will replace you, remember that the only benefit females get from sex is a baby, and your resources. Neither of which can come from a robot. Also, most females will never be able to afford one due to the lack of their work ethic.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 01:42 AM
3

But what is the purpose -- the destabilization of the family unit? Go read the communist manifesto, lays out the reasons quite well.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 01:30 AM
0

a former NBA superstar who has on a gold medal 5 championships and is now worth 500 million dollars Obviously 1 exception means that the stats are all bullshit right? NABALT?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 11:48 PM
4

Can I ask what is it about an African American that decreases woman's value? Any time you mingle, associate etc with someone of the lower class/ socioeconomic status your reputation takes a hit. . How do you think as a black ref pill.man should go about not decreasing woman's value By staying away from their superiors.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 11:34 PM
-4

upper class rich white Redundant.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 11:31 PM
7

His girlfriend is fucking black. She's a token black chick, that has enough European infused genetics that she's tolerable. She's nothing more than a marketing prop to him. A female version of Obama if you will.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 09:23 PM
5

DING DING DING, somebody gets it.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 09:14 PM
14

Nah, she'll just commit suicide by putting two bullets in the back of her head.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 09:13 PM
0

-Donald Sterling basically states that hanging out with black people decreases his girlfriend's value. -Behind Donald Sterling racism is deep seeded insecurity. One of these statements is not like the other, one of these statements does not belong. Care to take a guess which one? Hint: its the second one. Women of good pedigree do not go rolling around in the mud.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 09:11 PM
7

entire premise is that sex is somehow invalid My entire premise is based on biological reality. Reproductive organs are susceptible to any number of physical or bacterial breakdowns much like any other biological organ. Drinking too much alcohol will break down, and with enough consumption, cause your liver to fail. Females having multiple sexual partners can break down her sexual organs, increase the risk of contracting a sexual disease(this being true of men as well), along with causing over p…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 07:13 PM
8

What's wrong with women having casual sex? What isn't wrong would be a better question. From psychological damage, to the physical damage done to her biological reproductive organs. There is really nothing good about (multiple partner) casual sex for females. They're not built to be the town mattress, and can easily fuck their way to sterility.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 06:41 PM
2

Some rationality up in here. Watch out, you may just find yourself ostracized.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:36 PM
1

It screams of power consolidation by privileged people just like the rich insisting their oppressed by taxation when they pay less in relative to income and real rates than working class people. Yeah, there is not a single shred of evidence to this claim. Though I sure if you click your heals together 3 times and repeat it over and over again, it might just come true! Good luck!
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:34 PM
1

Jesus what a load of bat cheese. Could you possibly come up with a single original thought about "right wing" individuals and thought patterns that doesn't stem from your Marxist textbooks? Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:32 PM
2

Ok, there is a lot of medium to longer term advice here, but its not really getting to the heart of OPs issue, of which is that he has a short term problem being able to deal with being around these guys. Even mentions that 2 drinks solves the issue. So OP, this is how you get over your original hump, ready? Recognize the fact that these guys want you around. If they didn't, you wouldn't be there. You're welcome.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 10:22 PM
0

As long as manginas or femnazis sit a top the FDA and HHS the "male pill" will never come to market.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:23 PM
2

You're not helping =P
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:33 PM
4

Wow. Going to go let that one sink in for a bit.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:47 PM
1

but that doesn't mean people should do it. Never said they should either. However, how long do you really expect the current situation to continue before what I stated above becomes the norm?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:22 PM
1

democracy Americans live in a republic not a democracy. Know the difference. proportional representative system With the amount of people in this country who are more than content with absolving themselves of any responsibility, while gaming the system because they "deserve" it. The country would just collapse faster than it already is.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:19 PM
10

My head is exploding. Yeah I need a beer after that one. Is it noon yet?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:39 PM
16

there's no such thing as an "economically self-sufficient woman". Sure, women can support themselves economically, but only in technological societies. Which have always been built and maintained by males This right here. It's absolutely astounding to me how feminists love to claim credit for all of economic advancements that woman have made in the last 40 years or so. The same exact time the US, along with the majority of the western world, shifted from industrial economies to information(techn…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:38 PM
5

Am I the only one found this scary? No, you most certainly are not.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:55 PM
3

You'll need to eliminate women's suffrage at a minimum The day this stops getting down voted is the day we make a leap forward :/
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:48 PM
5

The first one you have no evidence for. How about every state in the union that had women suffrage before the 19th amendment? Seriously, what planet do you live on?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:15 PM
3

They're a barrier to STDs that often doesn't work. The spaces between latex molecules are 380 times the size of the HIV virus.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:42 AM
-1

I never came inside her. Never even came close..She got fucking pregnant. Probably a good idea to come to grips with the fact its not your kid, and she cheated on you.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:27 AM
1

Men are genetically superior of the two genders. It's the reason, we're taller, stronger, faster, and on average smarter than women. Getting people on board with this would go a long way to actually getting something done within the men's rights movement. You can not have equality between two inherently different entities. Forcing some kind of equality would require that men are either brought down to women's level through higher standards, or that women are lifted to mens through quotas and som…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 06:30 PM
1

On top of that, men are more diverse than women Yay for genetics. Now if we could only get everyone on board with this.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:28 AM
2

Which will make it that much worse when men finally wake up. We're not going to be the first civilization that has fallen to the female over zealousness.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 12:04 AM
1

Two things to find out if a man is trying to fuck you: 1)He's paying for everything. Dinner, drinks, clothes, transportaion etc. Men don't go out of their way to buy other people shit. Working sucks ass, and departing with money for nothing in return sucks balls. So if he is paying for your social outings, he's trying to fuck you. The exception: a very well off man who knows you don't make dick, and you could never afford his tastes anyway. 2)You ask him how many women he's slept with, and the h…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 12:00 AM
2

They already do this. How can you not know that by now, what are you an agent of the patriarchy? /s On a more serious note, since women are incapable of self sacrifice, they could not tolerate such a world.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:43 PM
3

So supporting free speech rights takes power from others? That's a natural right that inherently exists in all humans by their ability to speak. "Rights" outside of natural law are those handed out by a given society, such as the "right" to vote. Voting doesn't exist naturally, it is created by the society in which the individual lives. Henceforth, rights that are given, vs being natural, are a zero sum game due to the limited amount of resources in any given environment. You can claim a "right"…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:28 PM
3

I don't like it when others lump all feminists together because of some man haters. You realize the core, and by extension the funding/lobbying, of feminism is exactly this? People that call themselves feminists, but don't believe in man hating, and subjection of males are the fringe.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:17 PM
-1

I think everyone would be a lot better off if we just did away with the MRM and feminism and just had gender egalitarianism. You can not have equality between two unequal entities.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:15 PM
-1

You mean men are the only productive ones?!?! Gasp that can not possibly be true..you're just a misogynist. /s
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:52 PM
2

despite the fact that 75% of the people attending RIT are male Actually it's 66% to 33% or a 2:1 ratio. Although the girls hide in the liberal arts majors, while the engineering majors are closer to 20:1. With RIT being a tech school, this isn't out of the norm.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:21 PM
0

Gareth decided that being discriminated against for being gay was a men's rights issue but being discriminated against for being a white male was not a men's rights issue. I'm pretty sure I remember that, where did that go? Orwellian memory hole?? O.o
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:01 AM
1

Admittedly, I don't know much about how it works since I'm from the UK, but as far as I can tell, they're pretty similar. If someone wants to enlighten me on how Selective Service works that'd be great. Here, many of the government services for men are based on registration.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:05 AM
1

It's not me, it's you. You are well below my minimum standards of attractiveness, and I can already smell your vagina from here My screen, and the water now on it, appreciates this comment.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:36 PM
3

who assumes anyone who is liberal assumes that the best solution to any problem is expansion of the government. History is on his side with that one.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:40 PM
0

The proper way would be to shrink the government and let natural order take over. Unfortunately too many people need to be told what to do. Kind of a catch 22 really. Especially as long as females can vote for government husbandry.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:05 PM
3

and if you don't have something that someone else has, buck up and earn it. This here is probably my biggest stink with egalitarians. They expect women to be something they're not, men.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:02 PM
2

This.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:14 PM
1

but his middle ground between adult discussion and violence is either another kind of violence or literal rape. You're taking my posts far to literally. I just used those as basic examples of other options. That list was no where near conclusive.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:13 PM
1

Well I'm glad someone got it. I was starting to think I was overly obtuse to the point that everyone was missing the message.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:11 PM
-4

How is that a better choice than leaving voluntarily? I'm not talking about going off and punching your SO in the face and taking her on like she's some kind of man threatening your existence. You're being far too binary in thinking its either start throwing punches or bail. There is a large middle ground there. Such as if she starts copping said attitude, you put her over your knee and smack her ass a couple of times. Or even take her off to the bedroom and fuck her brains out. An adult male us…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:18 PM
-8

it's your responsibility to separate yourself from them. This is actually the worse thing you can do. Females need to know that you can stand your ground. So they'll cop an attitude, nag, and just be an all around bitch. It stems from their insecurities. They need to know that you, as a man, are capable of standing your ground. It's similar to how women need to be told they're loved, even when they should already know. They still have to hear it. Well when it comes to sating their insecurities, …
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:51 PM
-4

To me this is saying the women are saying they want to be hit. More often then not, they do. They're poking a lion with a stick to get a reaction out of you.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:45 PM
8

Do you have a source to back up this claim? Here; using a 15 point deviation' by the time you get to 130+ iq, men out number women 2:1, at 145 its 7:1, and 160 its 30:1.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:33 PM
5

Are they saying that these are high payed jobs? High paid relative to skill less jobs such as retail, or menial manual labor which make up the majority of jobs in this country.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:26 PM
1

multiculturalism is another big one The one two punch of societal destabilization
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:54 PM
1

Czarist Russia comes to mind. Sigh.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:46 PM
1

Yep, because traditionalist and conservative governments certainly weren't in charge during times when most people were impoverished or during bad times.... Name one country that has had a conservative government in that last 100 years.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:05 PM
2

Anyone else have a problem with the claim that being a liberal is the fault of all the worlds problems Considering the current state of the world and all countries are running some form of socialist/communist government, no.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:41 PM
1

If you really want change, don't vote. Just come up with a list of demands and 10 million or so and donate it to a presidential candidate.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:39 PM
1

inevitable collapse quicker. Funny, I actually read an article once that stated, and I'm paraphrasing, "the quickest way to end this suffrage experiment is to just give them what they want"
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:37 PM
0

It's fucked up to think about, yet so true at the same time O.o
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:22 PM
1

Retail clerk = software engineer. Both deserve the same benefits and pay via woman logic. By God, if that isn't true, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:00 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:54 PM
6

Here is a good starting point. Basically it comes down to genetics. Oversimplifying here, but because women have to X chromosomes, versus a males Xy chromosome it allows for a higher level of variance among men. So when looking at a chart with a 15 point deviation, and 100 being mean, 90% of women fall between 95 and 105 iq. 5% are higher, and 5% are lower. While going up in deviations more men than women will be represented. By 2 standard deviations(130+ IQ) men out number women over 2:1, by 3 …
/r/MensRights14/07/12 04:40 PM
1

When 95% of women have a 105 or less IQ; no, they shouldn't represent a slight majority in all majors. This is due to the fact that academically rigorous majors such as science, technology, engineering, or mathematics require a much higher than average intelligence to have any chance of completing those degrees.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter