TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

atred Archive

View 2 posts and 423 comments by atred on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

this is good for /r/rareinsults
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/21 05:55 AM
1

I feel like Lauren is the new Karen.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/21 11:32 AM
-8

Of course, men are already allowed to abort the baby they carry.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:29 AM
2

Why would we stop judging? Judging is one of the most important faculty of Homo Sapiens. For example I already judged the dude who used the term "cuck" above...
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:04 AM
13

Men aren't allowed "incorrect" opinions. But it's a more general phenomenon, you see it on this subreddit too. Everything that is "groupthink" has enemies and opinions that are not allowed/accepted.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:09 PM
21

If anything men have a clear financial interest to support abortion. The only way to get off the hook...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:51 PM
1

this is a meme for fun In the rules: No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:54 PM
6

They banned /r/incels, they need to go somewhere...
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:04 PM
9

/r/incels leaking here because of ban...
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:03 PM
22

Nobody is excited to be seen as an "affirmative-action hire" as somebody weaker than the rest, hired because of their sex or skin color. If women get this stink in some fields it's going to be very hard to wash it, in the end it should be in their interest to fight against "positive" discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:52 AM
1

I didn't read anything that came after "I'll get downvotted for this" as a policy I donwvote all the bitchy posts that start like that.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:46 PM
3

I'll get downvotted for this I aim to please.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:00 PM
71

You shouldn't feel shame for what other people are doing though. Maybe if you had a direct contribution, like if those people were your kids and you educated them, but otherwise even if they share an attribute with you: sex, skin color, nationality, political orientation, and so on you are not responsible and shouldn't feel shame for whatever they are doing. If you feel shame for what somebody is doing it means you aggregate yourself with that person (based on some characteristic) and you consid…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:27 PM
5

Protecting people who provide a service to set whatever rules they want for that service. Nobody has a right to Twitter, nobody has a right to appear on TV or be published in newspapers, there's no such invented right, nobody can force a TV station to carry their words why would they do that with Twitter?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:35 PM
5

Why are you not interested in protecting Twitter's freedom?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:32 PM
7

It's not about "not liking their opinions" it's that whatever they wrote breaks Twitter rules. There's a Twitter rule that was clearly broken: Violence: You may not make specific threats of violence or wish for the serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual or group of people. or: Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliatio…
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:04 PM
8

I am for free speech, but Twitter has the same freedom too to impose whatever rules they want -- if you are for freedom you cannot force companies like Twitter to give vile people a platform.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:47 PM
0

I wonder what you understand from Sartre if you cannot understand a simple joke that's even followed by "but seriously"...
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:41 PM
4

What's his Twitter handle? But seriously it's hard to understand that quote without context, it also seems wrong as a generalization, I'm pretty confident that fascism is not defined by the way it kills people, but I'm not a dictionary or a fascism specialist...
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:58 AM
5

Don't get it, what does fascism have to do with Julius and Ethel Rosenberg?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:43 AM
1

Not really, not a good joke and this is not a good forum for joking.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:03 PM
1

shh, it was a joke...
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:51 PM
1

So it's ultimately his fault?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:43 PM
1

Yes, if it fits the social interaction and the use case, if the technology doesn't fit is useless. A chat app for example helps with communicating at distance, but it doesn't solve the problem if the other person doesn't want to interact with you. You cannot have a "how not to steal/kill" app that would solve that societal problem, or a "get money for free" app. Technology can indirectly raise the standard of living and that might improve the stats for crimes, but that's not exactly what I was t…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:13 PM
0

I don't know why people think that there's always a technology solution to a social problem.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:38 PM
2

I assume it's also opt-in, in the sense that nobody is forcing you to buy, heck people who hate women would choose not to buy on purpose. If anything it's a positive sign that shows that misogynists are a small minority, otherwise they would not have such a category that people would find easy to discriminate against.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:33 PM
40

I wonder if it could be used in a court of law, I mean if somebody is accused of killing somebody and it shows in their Internet searches that they searched for a way to kill or dispose of a body would be relevant, just as relevant is if you bought this book right before accusing somebody...
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:10 AM
9

Those men who were killed in Normandy cannot satisfy Jennifer Lopez, totally useless.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:39 PM
4

lighten up a bit... somebody might confuse you for a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:53 AM
0

But the apple is orange...
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:44 AM
4

Didn't she die, do you want somebody to sue her?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:55 PM
5

Toxic feminism is more appropriate, an ideology can be toxic...
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:27 PM
1

Yep, agreed if you actually promote a post by downvoting might be a good incentive to stop this kind of behavior and also insure the posts are not buried. But then you give mods too much of a power to decide what gets buried.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:17 PM
2

You can browse by controversial. There's no easy solution, there is a purpose for downvoating trolls and idiots. It's mostly a matter of education, we need to educate people to accept people expressing different opinions and comment instead of downvote if they want to express their opposing position....
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:12 PM
-2

Nobody mentioned expecting to be voted for because of a vagina, the issue why women are underrepresented in Congress is a complex one, why do you want to dumb it down? Is it really because women are not "good enough" for Congress? Also, regardless of the reasons, it's pretty much a fact.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:15 PM
-3

Women are underrepresented in Congress Irrelevant What's irrelevant about this? Relevant to what? Go fuck yourself Great argument.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:58 PM
0

People don't like opinions that come in contradiction to their internalized holy opinions. Instead of debating/discussing it's easier to downvote to hell.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:55 PM
19

Downvotes are meant to hide your point, it's a form of censorship. I actually like the "reddiquette" [Do Not] Downvote an otherwise acceptable post because you don't personally like it. Think before you downvote and take a moment to ensure you're downvoting someone because they are not contributing to the community dialogue or discussion. If you simply take a moment to stop, think and examine your reasons for downvoting, rather than doing so out of an emotional reaction, you will ensure that you…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:48 PM
-2

Funny how you are downvoted :) Is that an irony?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:45 PM
65

That's OK, women will be able to use discounted men's razors...
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:07 PM
4

his low IQ?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:36 PM
6

I don't want Trump to be impeached, even though I detest him, I think he should be left to lead his clownish administration till its normal end and everybody who supported him take responsibility for the disaster in his wake.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:57 PM
0

And the actual convictions were for things they did before Trump started his campaign and hired them. Or lying to FBI and tempering with witnesses which happened after. It's not that relevant when they committed the crime, actually if they committed a crime before associating with Trump, it's telling that Trump has a tendency to surround himself with criminals. Trump will go to prison after he finishes his mandate too...
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:23 AM
-1

No, I mean that whatever she did she would still have won. As for breaking the law, I don't remember her lawyer, campaign chairman, foreign policy advisor, national security advisor be put in prison and spying for foreign countries, oh wait, those are all Trump's advisors and lawyers... hmmm...
/r/MensRights25/12/18 04:02 PM
-1

Still she would have won if not for Comey.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:42 PM
-12

I still don't understand why Trump won, he cares about exactly one man and that's not you. And why even bring Trump into a discussion about Google highlights... geez.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:50 AM
1

You cannot force a woman to abort the child, that's ridiculous, some people even consider that murder...
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:07 PM
1

It's not in anybody's body but you are responsible for it not the taxpayers since the taxpayers didn't fuck the mother, you did.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:05 PM
1

It's my body and my choice Of course, you have multiple options, not have sex, come outside (not reliable), use a condom, have sex with men, jerk off, etc. The kid or fetus though is not your body, while you can see how a fetus is inside the woman's body, hope you notice the difference...
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:56 PM
1

Society doesn't want to pay for your kid either, why should we? Please make an argument why taxpayers should be liable more for your kid than you.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:52 PM
1

Why would taxpayers pay for your kid? Did they fuck the mother?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:48 PM
1

Yes, a man doesn't have a right to abortion. As it should be.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:45 PM
0

Of course they don't have an abortion right because they don't carry the baby. You cannot ask equality when things are not equal.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:34 PM
0

A woman can give up a child after its born and a man can not. Like I said, that's what you need to focus on not on abortion since a man cannot abort a baby, you cannot talk about equality and mention abortion in the same sentence because it makes no sense. You still haven't given me a reason why a man should be forced to pay for an unwanted child for 18 years. Both men and women should be responsible for their acts. Why should society pay for your kid? I mean eventually society pays one way or a…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:12 PM
1

Men can abort sperm... How can you walk away from a pregnancy that you don't carry? Force the woman to have an abortion? It's not men's decision if the baby is carried to term or not and it should be. This "financial abortion" is a very strange concept of equality... Not to mention that once born a child has rights and nobody mother or father should be able to sign them off regardless of what a woman could have done or not during pregnancy. I'm a man, sympathetic to the cause of equality, but if…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:55 PM
0

I don't care what feminism teaches, and men can't give birth to babies or have abortions... so there's no equality there.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:08 PM
0

You cannot have equal rights in respect to abortion because things are not equal. You can push for equal rights when it comes to child abandonment or giving the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:20 PM
1

My initial point was to focus on things that are clear a problem not on abortion which obviously men cannot have, having a "obligation abortion" is seen as ridiculous by most of the people, including many men, and is a lost battle from start. You have to be smart what you focus on...
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:56 PM
2

I think both and men and women should have the same right to give the baby for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:52 PM
-9

What if a woman carries to term and then signs away parental rights? Can she do that? Can she do it by herself without consent of the father? if yes, then men should have the exact same right. I think we need to take out of the discussion abortion because things are not equal there, men don't carry babies and don't have to take decisions regarding their health.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:27 PM
3

That's what I thought, but is it to stop brigading Twitter (I would understand if that was a reddit account or subreddit)? I mean that doesn't make that much sense in the context since Twitter is not part of reddit and even more, Twitter seems purposely made for brigading, what are retweets anyway?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 03:37 AM
8

I wonder what's the point of hiding twitter handle when tweets are public? If something is said publicly then any privacy worries are kind of moot.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:12 PM
1

Just because there are criminals it doesn't mean that the law is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 02:49 PM
51

Heck, it's in the law.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:45 PM
15

Trump cares about exactly one white man.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:14 PM
3

Nobody has a right to be employed too, but if you get fired on false accusations you'd not be too happy...
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:52 PM
3

That said, the incident is irrelevant to revoking the credentials. How so, wasn't that the reason they provided for revoking the credentials?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:36 PM
2

Did he attack the rights of men?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 02:39 PM
5

You are for men's rights, except when they are on the left, then they "had it coming", gotcha.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 02:34 PM
4

Regardless of politics here, what did he do to the poor woman?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:27 PM
2

Of course, when Kavanaugh will be prosecuted for his lies.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:52 PM
1

As a white man I'm offended that that orange douche-bag somehow is supposed to represent me.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 03:01 PM
2

Gotcha, but the point is that while few people actually "take part" in something, but they do have influence. For example, I could vote Democrat, but not be a member of the Democrat Party, the number of members is fairly small, that doesn't mean that Democrats are only the people who attend Democrat Party member meetings. So how do you measure who is "really" a feminist?
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:51 PM
1

That's a bit of BS, most of the people accept things at face value or at least without going under the very shallow surface unless they have a special interest in the subject.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 01:25 PM
10

"if you are for equality you are feminist" isn't that the feminist sales pitch? I'm sure many men are fine with that if they don't look too much into it.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:16 AM
23

I would not work either if I got $115K a month from somebody, heck I would find a way to remain pregnant for that even though I'm a man. The incentive is way too big.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:42 PM
17

That's how it is not how it should be. The issue is that is illegal and an aggravating factor if you used alcohol to rape somebody.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:47 PM
46

Providing alcohol to minors should by itself (not to mention that it was done to facilitate another crime) be punishable by more than that. In some states is a misdemeanor in other is a felony to give alcohol to minors. Jail sentences for misdemeanors can range from a few days to one year. Felony convictions that result in prison sentences will include sentences of at least a year, though they may be significantly longer, depending on the circumstances.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 04:21 PM
22

Their problem is that they think in categories and generalizations: those men are also attacked probably by men, so "men are the danger" => "all men are potential aggressors". The issue is if it's OK to think of an entire category for something that only 1% (or a small percentage, not sure how much) of them does. On the other hand, is it OK to think that women are potential cheaters, gold-diggers, backstabbers, liars, STD carriers, false accusers? Maybe... maybe not, but it's probably a good ide…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 03:52 PM
2

Let's get real, GOP would want him even if was proven beyond any doubt that he did what he accused of doing. Just confirming him doesn't prove anything, only that GOP would vote for rapists and child molesters if that serves their purposes. Also, the dude didn't behave like a judge he behaved like an alcoholic who either drank too much the day before or was in withdrawal, "how about you, did you pass out?" or the fact that he accused the Clintons for framing him without any proof should have dis…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 07:49 PM
1

How is that changing what I said?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:28 AM
1

I thought it was implied: I believe victims of rape... if they’ve been raped. What does "I believe victims of rape" mean if it's not automatic? So you don't actually believe them unless.... what?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:02 AM
1

Sometimes victims accuse somebody else. Either on purpose for whatever reasons or because of mistaken identity. So even if somebody is well intentioned should not be believed automatically -- that's kind of dumb.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 02:14 AM
-15

Good riddance.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:23 PM
1

Blame life, Universe?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:49 PM
1

Not 99.99% of them...
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:37 PM
3

How did I forget them? 5 homicides per 100,000 is an average, whatever happens in Virgin Island which has a population of 100k is not going to move the average in the entire US. Even PR with 3.3 mil. is a drop in water compared to 325 mil. What's your point? Let's take the absolute worth murder rate. St. Louis with 64.5 at 100,000... in what way would this number change my argument?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:10 PM
4

It's facts that idiots didn't think about. When you blame an entire group when 9,999 out of 10,000 didn't commit any crime, it's pretty clear you didn't think things through. It's also point out facts for people who take things pre-thought by other people, if they are vaccinated with a counter argument it is easier to resist to the spread of stupid ideas.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:08 PM
1

Also, most of the murderers are already behind bars. I think 2/3 of the murder cases are usually closed.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:02 PM
1

It's a lot (although "lot" is relative), but it also doesn't warrant "blame men". The question is, how can you cast such a wide net and blame an entire group when 9,999 of the members are not guilty and 1 is guilty?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:00 PM
93

The huge majority of men don't commit murders. By the way, that's also true for immigrants (illegal or not). That's also true for black people or poor people. There are about 5 homicides per 100,000 people in US per year even assuming that all the murderers were men (and simplifying a bit to exclude multiple or repeated murders) it means that about 0.01% of men committed murders in a year. Generalizing from that to "blame men" is idiotic, what about the 99.99% who don't commit murders? Is that i…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:50 AM
3

"group of people that has systematically bused them" - a group cannot abuse, it's an idiotic generalization, unless every member of the group abused somebody then treating the entire group as guilty is bound to mistreat members of the group that didn't abuse anybody.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:40 PM
4

Why would you want to destroy the country for that? Isn't that like cutting off your nose to spite the face?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:10 AM
1

Of course, only that there's a difference between contradicting and wanting to shut somebody up. Did you see The Red Pill documentary? The difference is clear there.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:01 PM
2

If somebody doesn't say "Merry Christmas" to me it means I'm persecuted.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:59 PM
3

You are still immature though.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:21 PM
2

What did he wear though?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:20 PM
2

"having sex with an underage person" -- no red herring and loaded emotional language. While I don't agree with the OP in general, I do agree that "rape" is a loaded emotional term that is not always helpful.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:08 AM
1

Sometimes I wish this kind of things were fake. Can I hope at least?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:06 PM
17

Why would you touch radioactive subjects, what's wrong with people, don't they have some common sense? BTW, if you have the balls you can talk about anything, but if you have to retract and apologize immediately it just shows that you shot your mouth without thinking.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 05:24 AM
1

Truth appreciation is most likely a matter of culture not DNA. EDIT: Although I have to admit, I'm biased too, I think that orange people are lying bastards.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:05 PM
3

There would be no libraries without awesome white men. I'm a white dude, but dude... come on. Do you think China needed white men to come over to build libraries for them? Or India? Or Africa (sure Library of Alexandria was built by Ptolemy a Greek dude, but Ethiopia also had one of the oldest library in the world). The ethic of truth, always speaking truthfully, would not exist but for white men. Oh, right cause any other color of the skin causes people to lie. I heard about people who are not …
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:05 PM
3

Fist time I see him and don't know anything about him, sounds like a great guy.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:18 AM
1

See the post I replied to, it implied that man = rational and inward looking person, woman = irrational and blaming everybody else but herself. My point was simple, that men can be irrational and generalize about women just as women generalize about men and provided a local example in support of that. Point?
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:54 PM
6

Yes, you don't advance your cause by being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 03:58 PM
11

Men do the same shit, even here (especially here?), I replied to a dude who was saying "Because women are children. All women are feminists"
/r/MensRights23/06/18 01:29 PM
-3

/r/MensRights posters who misattribute quotes?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:09 AM
0

She can "opt out" for any reason by having an abortion, it's not a "financial out out" it's an abortion that she can do because of a simple biological reality, she's the one who carries the baby, it's inside her, the man doesn't have this "option" because he doesn't carry the baby. That's the main difference, trying to make it about financial equality won't cut it because it's not about that.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:07 AM
0

It might mean that... I think on my own not with other people's brains <<insert random group that think I agree with>> It's also a matter of understanding context, a person might make a choice for some reasons including financial, what I actually said was "should never be pressured to abort babies because of the financial considerations". Assuming that what the pro-choice advocate says is correct that women choose to abort because of financial reason, then it actually strengthens my argument, no…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:19 PM
-1

That sucks, but that's life and you need to expect this kind of things if have unprotected sex (I don't trust other people to not lie or to forget to take their birth control). The way you are treated by courts is shameful and this needs to be fixed, but I don't get what choice you'd like, would you like to have a say if the woman has an abortion or not? Would you like to be able to say "I don't want the kid, abort it"? I think that's also wrong and society will not accept forcing women to have …
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:21 PM
1

And? What's wrong with that? Like I replied to many everybody has their own responsibility, women have one extra option because they are the ones who carry the baby, it's inside their body.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:10 PM
1

Why do you think I don't apply the argument to women? They should have their own responsibility, the biological fact is that they carry the baby so they have more options after.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:09 PM
1

Getting married makes you legally responsible if they have a child during it that is not yours. Now we agree, that should definitely not happen.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:21 AM
1

3000 kids in 19 years out of which we don't know how many fathers were not informed. Doesn't sound to me like a huge problem. Also if you want to make sure you are part of your kid's life and have a saying get married. That's the purpose of marriage, am I wrong? You have unprotected sex with a woman with whom you are not married you can expect that as a possible result. Heck, she doesn't even have to declare you as the father and the kid can be raised by another father... that's life.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:15 AM
1

Not sure if the results are so fucked up, if they reduce the number of abortions reduce the infanticide rate it might be a good law, the only thing is that they should probably make sure that both parents agree with the decision, just like in case of adoptions the decision should not be taken only by one parent. Also from what I read it was used for about 3000 children in 15 years or so, that's a really small number -- better than having them killed anyway, but it doesn't sound like a huge hidde…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:06 AM
2

Sounded like what you are claiming is incorrect, a quick google revealed this: Child abandonment is illegal in the United States, but some states consider it to be a felony offense, while others categorize it as a misdemeanor, so punishments range from a $2,000 fine to up to 5 years in prison and a $125,000 penalty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abandonment#Child_abandonment_laws So it's illegal. OK, I've found more info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-haven_law But it doesn't like lik…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:54 AM
1

Women LEGALLY can abandon their parental obligations even after a child is born with 0 repercussions. We were talking about abortion till now. I am a bit skeptical about that, is that true, how does it work? Can they just walk away from the baby, leave it in the hospital?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:45 AM
0

If you had a vasectomy and use a condom (mostly for STD) the chances to get somebody pregnant are probably same chance to be killed by a free-falling whale when you get out of your house, I would take that chance. And even if that improbability happens, the thing is, who should take care of the kid, the society, or the biological parents? I know it sounds unfair to people involved, but the reverse is also unfair for somebody else.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:31 AM
0

A woman choice is not about financials, it's about her body and what she wants to do with it. An abortion should never be about financials, women should never be pressured to abort babies because of the financial considerations.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:42 AM
0

Why should she be able to get an abortion? Because the fetus is in her body? Why shouldn't she "take responsibility for her actions"? She should, if she gets an abortion for example it's her body she puts it through and she should not make the man pay for the abortion.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:38 AM
1

No, I'm not. At least not completely. I think the society should work to minimize the number of abortion but not by forbidding them. Also I'm find with late term bans for abortion unless for medical reasons.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:38 AM
0

Like I said in other post everybody male or female is responsible for their free choices.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:23 AM
-1

if women can opt out so should men be able to, Things are not equal, men don't carry the fetus, you cannot ask for equality when things are not equal, it's like asking for women to do the same hard jobs that men can do better even if they fail the tests (like in Army) because "equality". Hell male rape victims that were not even old enough to consent can be forced to pay child support for the result of their rape with no say in the matter at all. That's obviously wrong.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 12:00 AM
-8

So what you are saying is when you decide to go to sleep and wake up to being raped it is your fault? Where did I say anything that implied that, I was talking about "when you willing do something", good grief! How about when the person pokes a hole in the condom? The person who does that should be full and solely responsible, but we were talking in general not about specific things. And is also compatible with what I advocate, people should be responsible for their acts. WTF is wrong with you? …
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:59 PM
-9

Because he's responsible for his actions? You have unprotected sex there's a high probability to become a parent (and if it's an "accident" the chance is smaller but still there). If you are a parent you have to take care of the kid, you cannot say "I changed my mind, I don't really like kids, why not let the mother take care of it" not sure how the law is but that should be true for the mother too, she should not say "I'm bored, let the father take care of the kid", both parents should be respo…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:56 PM
1

I mean, it really seems like you're looking at Decision A (having sex), and trying to apply the value of responsibility B (raising a child). The two are separate. You have to take the responsibility that as a consequence of having sex you might end up being a parent, if you are a parent you have to take care of the kid, things flow pretty logically. If the man chooses no for Decision B, then you can't hold him responsible for B, Because he's responsible for A that leads to B so he's responsible …
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:51 PM
0

In order to be responsible, you need to be given certain freedoms/rights. You are responsible for the actions that you freely take. You don't need to be given any "certain" freedoms/rights. You decide to have unprotected sex you take part of the responsibility that the woman might get pregnant, even if you have protected sex you take part of the responsibility of an "accident". She needs to make that decision regardless of what the man's decision is. Of course, it's not the man's body, the fetus…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:27 PM
-14

For instance, if a man doesn't want the child but the women does, she keeps the child and he pays child support for the next 18 years, even if he didn't want the baby. When the roles are reversed and the man does want the baby and the woman doesn't, she can just abort the baby and the man has to just deal with it. How do you see things going when a woman doesn't want a baby, but the man wants it, force her to keep it to term?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:12 PM
-1

Where did I say "punishment" it gets old talking to people who put words in your mouth. I said responsibility, I think both and men and women should be responsible for what they do, women have an additional opportunity to get rid of pregnancy because they carry the baby, if the men would carry the baby in their body they should have the same rights. It's just a matter of biological realities.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:09 PM
-11

Of course not, that's why when you willing do something that is not 100% you take the responsibility for the percentage that adds up to 100.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:54 PM
-20

How is that changing anything I said.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:28 PM
-5

Yes, they had a choice, but they have another choice later on with abortion, a men doesn't but a man is not pregnant either.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:27 PM
9

What about a single father can he use the same laws?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:04 PM
-95

Yes, he had the chance when he chose not to use protection or not to get a vasectomy and have sex with a woman, what do you think would happen?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:03 PM
17

My eyes, my choice.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 03:22 AM
1

I don't know, but think about it in your case does it make it less likely to look for a job in health care or early education where you kind of know that men are not that welcomed? Maybe if you didn't have a choice you'd do that but the influence is that you'd not even have the primary impulse to look into this kind of career...
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:39 PM
3

Stop generalizing.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:39 PM
10

I'm pretty sure that stereotypes do influence behavior, it would be very strange for ideas not to influence other ideas and thus behavior. It might be very hard to examine the direction of the influence and the extent.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:38 PM
6

For a community who insists Sounds to me like a generalization. A community cannot insist anything, people have their own opinion some believe men are better in tech, some don't. As for my view: tech is difficult and pretty dry, if you as a man or woman have a choice to do something easier then you'll be more likely to give up tech, if anything, having so many men in tech is a sign that they don't have it easy.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:01 PM
30

I don't think feminists should even try to help men, just like Men's Rights movement should not be focused on helping women. I think each should try to do the job that they self-tasked to do without hurting somebody else. It's better if they don't claim they fight for equality "of everybody" it's better if they admit they are a group for advancement of women's causes.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:14 PM
1

Doesn't seem true, I'm not banned there.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:43 PM
5

Science and math are fields where you need a lot of persistence and teeth grinding to be able to do anything of value, if somebody "making you feel unwelcome" is what stopped you from pursuing STEM then most likely you were not cut for that in the first place. Also if anything teachers are mostly female, I don't see how men could have made them unwelcome from early age when: Male educators constitute just 2.3% of pre-K and kindergarten teachers, 18.3% of the elementary and middle school teacher …
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:39 PM
2

It is, but if you do it to yourself you can be blamed, it's not like "checking how rape victims were dressed" as someone commented. If somebody has a "hold my beer" type of accident, they are still a "victim", but are they beyond any type of criticism and blame? I'm not saying it's necessarily warranted, I just wanted to point out that there's a clear difference between "blaming the victim" when somebody else does something to the victim (rape for example) and when the victim is primary responsi…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:15 AM
8

The idea is that if you meet a "good guy" you have to consider that he's a potential rapist. Not sure how to comment on that, on one hand some people are terrible judges of character and those should be worried that what they think "good" guys are might not actually that good, on another hand, promoting paranoia and living a life where you are afraid of everybody is not healthy.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:01 PM
1

I think it's nothing wrong with asking for citations, it makes the argument stronger if you have better vetted facts.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:05 PM
3

Even if you lock your door you can have a determined burglar stole your stuff. Burglars are not entitled to take your stuff even if you leave the door unlocked. As for "blame" forgetting to lock the door is not much of a guilt, the main guilt resides with the burglar, or in case of home invasion and murder with the murderer, nobody is going to say "of course he was murdered, he left his door unlocked". I think the comparison is actually very apt, although as mentioned by OP that was not the poin…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:16 PM
48

Somebody might have reported her account... there's always an asshole.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:08 PM
7

Joke's on them, with women getting more college degrees and advancing in jobs and being less affected by unemployment they will end up paying alimony.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:08 PM
2

That's all fine, I even agree with the idea that feminism is about advancing women's causes, but the thing is that they (some?) claim that feminism is about equality and that men are feminist too if they are for equality... but then if you mention "what about men" you are interrupting and derailing... so maybe it's not exactly about equality, or better said it's about women's equality, not men's equality (sorry, some animals can be more equal than others), maybe it's about advancing women's caus…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:28 AM
3

Yes, so? Do you know that whites are mostly killed by whites? Where is the outrage?!
/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:24 AM
0

I think "where is the outrage" is pretty idiotic. You cannot prescribe what people should or should not be outraged about. And why protest, that bad people commit bad acts? Also the subject was "liberal media" it's not really the purpose of the media to protest.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:05 PM
3

What's a better news story: "dog bites human", or "human bites dog"? (not comparing anybody to dogs, just making a point) The fact that something happens at a much greater rate make it less likely to be reported, not more likely.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:41 PM
-1

What's so special about blacks killing blacks that needs to be addressed?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:55 PM
17

It's simple, we force the women who are taking gender studies to switch to computer science classes, problem solved.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:40 PM
10

Beveridge's Law Betteridge's, but yeah.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:21 PM
6

Did the study make the claim that "same" products rather than "similar" were priced differently? The only thing I see "same" in the document is the claim of "same haircut" which I find that a bit doubtful, if anything women have a lot more hair on average on the head, and how many women actually get the "same" haircut as men? Not to mention that hair stylist even if they give the "same" haircut they might have different opportunity costs, if it's a stylist that gives expensive haircuts even if t…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:52 PM
8

You don't need to debunk something that is just affirmed without supporting evidence. And she actually showed that there's some lying involved in all of this... "same" vs. "similar" for example.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:39 PM
10

Your logic IS rape.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:56 PM
1

But the real question is, are they paid equally?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 01:44 PM
1

EDIT: One more thing to consider. How many people are raped and killed? How many of those were killed because the rapist didn't want to get caught? Applying the same logic, should we make rape legal then? Wouldn't it save lives? Most people would think that was absurd and put women at greater risk. Why then is it better for men to essentially decriminalize false accusations of rape? That's why you don't give ridiculous punishment for rape, one could say rapists (especially child rapist) deserve …
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:18 PM
1

What's the punishment for false accusations (if the person doesn't confess), up to 1-year prison? What would then be the right punishment for a person who confesses the lie that: encourage them to confess. really punish them for what they did As you can see 1 and 2 are in conflict... I mean $200 is ridiculous, but if you go too high with the punishment, let's say 6-month prison, then the person will take their chance and never confess.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:47 PM
0

What further damage? Is the dead person dying more?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:11 PM
-1

Did you ignore this? Sure, it doesn't fix everything I didn't ignore the psychological damage, I focused on stopping the damage, not on damage already done. Personally I think that's more important. If you were unjustly accused of something I think you'd be more interested to be vindicated than to potentially punish the accuser if you could prove that they lied (which is sometimes very hard).
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:34 PM
-4

Id you confess to murder you get maybe 15 years instead of 17, but you don't get a motherfucking fine for it. Like I said the person is still dead, confessing a murder doesn't solve anything, maybe only a mystery. Confessing a lie sets things straight and vindicates the accused person. Sure, it doesn't fix everything, but it also stops further damage, if you killed somebody not confessing doesn't continue to kill the person, while if you lie about somebody not confessing continues to hurt the pe…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:24 PM
-6

People should not be lying in the first place. Yeah, right. Your argument is like saying the punishment for any other crime should be low because then people will admit they did it. That's how it is in the real world, not in the world you are living in, it's common to plead guilty to get reduced punishment. Also, if you admit you stole a piece of bread and ate it that piece of bread will not get re-materialized, or if you admit you killed somebody, that slain person will not revive, but if you a…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:01 PM
-6

and when the false accuser's lie is ferreted out thereafter, police and prosecutors charge her with... nothing. Why? Because we live in a gynocentric shithole where cops, judges and prosecutors are gynocentric sexist pigs who hold the lives of females in high regard, but the lives of males not at all. You have to think about perverse effects if the liars are punished too severely. I can understand the feeling and desire to punish any such liar, but if you set punishment too high for liars they w…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:15 PM
8

Most of the men, more precisely, 99.9999% of them are not mass shooters. It's ridiculous to draw conclusions about "white boys" entitlement in this context.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:04 PM
2

Possibly... but where are they not equal to men, that infamous "wage gap"? Are they militating to work harder and more dangerous jobs and longer hours to bring their salaries equal to men's, or just interested to reduce the "inequality" by having equal salaries for unequal work? Are they militating for reduction of female personnel in jobs that are dominated by women: primary education, nursing, social services, etc? Do they militate to reduce the number of men who are homeless to bring it up to…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:54 AM
2

What if the teacher was male? Same standard?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:29 PM
18

Do you tell "Get a life guys" to people who say "Earth is round"?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:58 PM
12

Way to go to legitimize rape...
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:56 PM
5

I think people are justified to be angry and these posts are a symptom of the very real problem of gender quotas and female centric propaganda. Being upset doesn't justify making up shit and flinging it around.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:53 AM
2

Those feminists though are not a mystery to anybody...
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:18 PM
1

"Fucking pussy" -- Oh, I'm sorry, I guess you just won the argument. You showed your superior IQ and morality, I guess the only thing remaining is to bow my head in shame and admit defeat.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:29 PM
3

It is, calling men names based on their sexual inclinations: cuck, virgin, "can't get a girl" etc is abusive. You are a piece of shit by the way. And that's abusive towards pieces of shit...
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:41 PM
5

Wow, somebody has an opinion that is different than yours and immediately it means that they like to fap to other men fucking their significant other. You can be wrong about something without being into this kind of things, but talking about which, calling men: cucks, virgins, etc is a way to diminish them according to their sexual preferences and status, it's abusive and not actually important to the argument.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:38 PM
4

"retarded", "cuck" if you use these words it doesn't make you sound smart, on the contrary, it devalues whatever point you are trying to make.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:25 PM
5

Please don't use the word, we are not on The_Donald and it's abusive towards men.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 03:22 PM
26

When they graduate will they seek jobs in women only companies?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:16 PM
3

Educated doesn't mean smart, smart doesn't mean impossible to make logical mistakes. She has her own problems possibly (probably) caused by interaction with one or a number of men and this is a cry for other people to get validation, company and pats on the back from like-minded people, if anything it's an ego play and attention seeking behavior. She's probably not self-aware and she didn't think to turn the questions on herself because she would not have liked the responses. I don't know how yo…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:14 AM
3

I found them
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:02 AM
17

It's simple, study STEM, not gender studies.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:38 PM
27

"Husband arrested for illegal wiretapping"
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:42 AM
4

Statutory rape, but I actually dislike this word being thrown around like this. There's such a big difference between having a knife at your neck and being forced to have sex (which this word evokes) and willingly and probably enthusiastically having sex at a more or less immature age (some countries have lower consent age -- so what is rape in one country is just sex in another) with somebody older than you. Same thing with having sex with somebody who had a couple of beers and then they regret…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:10 PM
6

I would not attribute to malice (conspiracy) what I can attribute to click-bait behavior.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:00 PM
2

And if it were what would it have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:28 PM
2

Haha, I meant Red Pill...
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:34 PM
6

I also think it's coined on purpose, designed to provoke guilt, observe that they figured out that if they talk about (at least some) black people being disadvantaged (which one can make a valid case for) people would yawn, they talk about white people being advantaged, privileged in general so if something happened to white people (especially men): passed over for a promotion, not accepted at college to make room for people who are not "privileged" nobody will feel bad for them... "why should I…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:22 AM
2

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:06 PM
3

all Macs... no diversity.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:25 PM
4

While the women were at home twiddling their fingers and refusing to work? Probably busy teaching and studying about the patriarchy...
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:46 PM
1

99% of all infrastructure was built, physically, by men. And some manly women. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:45 PM
1

Mexico didn't want to pay for it.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:57 AM
21

They are shunned by women. Also, see what happened to the feminist Aziz Ansari...
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:51 AM
8

Replace them with whom? Ban them from what?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:24 AM
12

cucks Please don't. This is not the The_Donald. If anything this is an abusive word towards men.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 05:20 AM
3

I think he declared he's a feminist so maybe that gives him a free out-of-jail pass from some people while other feminists will give a rat's ass about him.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:02 AM
7

Nobody is paid less for doing the same job, it's against the law.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:26 PM
1

Interesting concept: it's your fault if you complain you were wronged. Also, I like how you claim absolute knowledge about what happened.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:26 AM
1

Same thing with the men that Spacey harassed/attacked? Were they partial at fault too?
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:05 AM
2

Are those women who do that the same women who were assaulted? Or we make the assumption that all women in the business tell directors that they will sleep with them to get roles? I'm not sure why we talk here about common sense. That's almost like saying women sell sexual favors for money (obviously true in some cases) and therefore women are partially to blame for women who are raped (it doesn't follow). EDIT: Also, the men assaulted by Kevin Spacey where they also partially to blame?
/r/MensRights20/12/17 05:00 AM
3

Are those women who are to blame the same ones that were assaulted and harassed?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:30 PM
2

Good point How can you say that when you seem to have missed it.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:25 PM
6

Sharing feelings doesn't solve all the problems. For example it cannot cure a terminal cancer nor necessarily make you feel better about it. It doesn't solve financial issues either. masculinity-focused society. Groan (doing my part of sharing my feelings)
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:27 AM
34

Or make fun of the guys who could not get women. There's a stigma linked to that -- maybe even a cause for suicide.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:37 AM
6

The female life is more valuable because population growth requires many females and few males. Do you feel like the Earth is underpopulated, do we really require population growth?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:08 AM
72

Yes, think of all the women who remain unprovided for once their men selfishly take their own lives.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:53 AM
284

"1 in 4 suicide victims are women"
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:59 PM
3

60% non-shit is pretty good stats.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:08 PM
9

Are you a participant in Persecution Olympics? Do you realize it's not a contest and not a zero-sum game? What's misogynistic about men having their own problems recognized?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:53 PM
8

Recognised That Men & Boys Have Challenges That Are To Be Acknowledged, Respected And Addressed. Almost like they are people too...
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:52 PM
4

They are always ready to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:01 AM
48

I don't know, try to take your pants off in the metro and see how it goes.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:53 PM
7

You'd need to be self aware to be intentionally ironic.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:38 PM
1

Starting a sentence with: "No offense", "With all due respect", "In fairness" seems to suggest that what comes after is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:37 PM
18

he also had writers...
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:46 AM
73

How about the MRA perspective about feminists and towards themselves? It can be applied for any kind of generalizations. This quote is great though.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:44 AM
13

Actually this makes it even worse, so it wasn't his fault in the first place (as far as I understand) and trying to make it right was not enough and the judge had his hands tied. Talking about being screwed by the system.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 03:33 PM
1

Yes, but I don't see T_D being banned impossible or even improbable... saying if T_D stays and does this subreddit doesn't assure anybody of anything.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 02:33 PM
1

I don't see the equivalence.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 04:55 AM
1

The point though is that 99.9946% of men are not murderers. To me it's ridiculous to talk about the preponderance of male murderers in this context. Even if you take other violent crimes it's usually a small group that commits them. Talking about it as a "male problem" or as a "we should teach men not to murder" is missing the mark.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 09:03 PM
3

I explained in another post what I see wrong with it, on the surface it looks true, the problem is grouping, is sex a relevant discriminant? Somebody else posted: 0.0054% of the population are male murderers, 0.0006% of the population are female murderers. Bad people commit bad acts, it seems that talking about sex of murderers is a red herring if 99.9946% of men are not murderers.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:54 PM
2

It's true, but the problem in my mind is grouping. Is sex the relevant discriminant when most of the men are not committing violent crimes? Especially when men are the most likely victims too? Same goes for race, is it OK to make a slide: "blacks are more likely to commit crimes"? I mean, it's true, one could provide statistic proof. In my option bad people commit bad acts, the characteristic of those people: color, sex, height, are external to them being bad and should not be overly stressed in…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:43 PM
5

I agree it's easy to make "feminists" out of men by misleading questions: "Are you for women right to vote?", "are you for women equal treatment?", "Are you against sexual harassment?" -- then you are a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 04:43 PM
13

Unless you are Seinfeld
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:48 PM
1

If you are not happy why stay? Why fear of unknown that I see you mentioned in the response is worse than present unhappiness? Unknown can bring good things too. I don't see a reason for you to stay. Taking action sometimes is hard but it's time to do it, it was time to do it at the moment it got physical, if you hold somebody from punching you and have a desire to punch them it's not love it's not worth it, get out. Now.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:12 PM
12

That means you can't win, basically if you take care of women you do it for your own selfish purposes.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:25 PM
3

I love my father!
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:49 PM
1

I'm not familiar with the case, not that it interests me too much, but if she was of age what was he convicted for? I do agree that failing to defend people who are imperfect is cowardice. It's like not defending freedom of speech because you don't agree with what is said.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:37 PM
2

I think those laws where kids are convicted for creating and distribution of child porn should be burned and buried. First of all they are underage, you cannot say they cannot consent, but then at the same time make them responsible for sending naked selfies. How can you responsible without consent? Or how can you not be able to consent if you are responsible, something is very fishy.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:33 PM
2

OK, so I guess we agree about something, see my first post in the thread: To make it clear, I don't advocate having sex with 14 years olds, I just think the term "rape" and "rapist" are a bit too harsh for the reality. I also am not OK with having a same term being used for two totally different situations, when somebody is forcefully raped, maybe even threatened with a weapon or beaten and when somebody who is one day before his/her 18th birthday has willingly sex with somebody who is one day o…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:54 PM
1

So you mean you can make perfectly sound arguments, maybe even better than me, but you cannot decide for yourself if you want to have sex with somebody? Even more, legally you are fine to have sex with another 15 year old, but not with somebody who is merely 3 years older, you'd be raped, don't you see a problem there?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:37 PM
0

Apparently your mind is not well developed to be able to process this discussion in a calm and rational manner.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:30 PM
0

I think you are not mature enough to post here either.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:21 PM
1

Really, murdering somebody is independent of brain?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:11 PM
1

Having sex with a large bar?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:02 PM
1

If you are 14 year old and you commit a murder sometimes you are judged as an adult. Why would that not be true for your decision to have sex?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:14 PM
-4

I don't know, this is a very loaded word and I actually think it doesn't represent what happened regardless if the young person was male or female. There's a difference between forcing yourself on somebody and both sides having sex willingly when one person is under a specific age. Also, I don't get how 14 years young people are treated as beings without a brain. I remember I was able to decide for myself what was good for me or not and at most if you do make a mistake it's your mistake to make,…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 10:16 PM
1

I was commenting on his words, he implied that a picture of naked person under age 18 is automatically child port, I explained that's not true.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:29 PM
1

I was replying to the OP, you got into the discussion with an argument I didn't make/address, sorry I confused you with the OP, so understand my point as "I was replying to his/her words that were clearly untrue"
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:30 AM
1

Are nude pictures of people below the age 18 not child porn? It doesn't matter who pressed the button, it's CP.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:23 AM
1

I was replying to the words you wrote that were clearly untrue.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:19 AM
3

Are nude pictures of people below the age 18 not child porn? No, they are not. "Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor". So being nude in a picture is not enough, it needs to either be a picture of a sexual act or at least be "sexually suggestive". http://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-2256.html
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:38 PM
9

"that matter" -- missing from that sentence, but apparently self-understood by the people who say things like that and by the people who listen.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:28 PM
1

True, I misunderstood that picture, I saw a car lighter adapter in that picture so I assume it was talking about car batteries.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:03 PM
1

I don't understand 9V car batteries cannot charge a phone? What if you run the engine to charge the battery?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:22 PM
2

No it was not, the expansion of it is however troublesome. It's one thing to make a rule to avoid discrimination and another thing to give instructions to that rule that it means that any misbehavior towards women is to be considered discriminatory and to put Universities on very defensive positions thus forcing them to overreact and punish people even though it's not clear they committed a crime (at least not adjudicated in a court of law).
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:27 PM
29

There are other rules, bing bang boom sounds "correct", not bang bing boom, or boom bang bing, or bang boom bing., or bing boom bang, or boom bing bang... Find the patriarchy here. Man and women might very well conform to this rule.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 03:25 AM
8

It's implied that they are losers who cannot get women.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:14 AM
1

Well, if they believe they can get 77 virgins that way who knows...
/r/MensRights13/08/17 01:32 PM
17

"but if you want equal treatment how come you are not feminist" -- that's what brainwashed people think...
/r/MensRights13/08/17 01:30 PM
1

That's the definition of hate speech.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:28 PM
3

Has nothing to do with any rights...
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:12 AM
7

Voila, not viola. Viola is a musical instrument, voila is French for "here is".
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:43 PM
2

Does Facebook even support games anymore? It's just a site like any other site, no more dangerous than reddit.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:21 PM
22

Easy, you post her IQ score. So the next beer ad with a topless blonde will have the disclaimer: "Hilda scored 125 at her IQ test". Problem solved.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:18 PM
2

You know what's funny, if the professor said something deemed "wrong" in North Korea she would be dead too. Talking about privilege...
/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:54 PM
35

Casual misandry, the best kind of misandry.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:23 PM
6

I think oral sex is defined as sodomy. From Wikipedia: Sodomy (/ˈsɒdəmi/) is generally anal or oral sex between people or sexual activity between a person and a non-human animal (bestiality), but it may also mean any non-procreative sexual activity.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:17 AM
1

"Let me think for you"
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:05 PM
6

I watched it, it made me a bit mad and sad, but it has a great value for society I think, also very well done. Probably you don't like documentaries...
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:59 PM
4

I liked Shoe0nHead video about the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2nOsdj8dmc
/r/MensRights09/06/17 04:31 AM
3

There's a bias here though, we seem to assume the owners are men (which might have historical basis though).
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:08 PM
2

It's total bullshit, in Romanian for example "onoare" (honor) is feminine, "curaj" (courage) is neuter. Has nothing to do with concepts of positive or negative.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:05 PM
15

is anybody forcing you to be here?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:11 AM
6

Yuck, they all use Macs.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:11 AM
2

Probably false balance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:05 AM
2

That's not what they mean from what I understand. Both side-ism would be giving the same amount of time and attention to historians and Holocaust deniers. BTW, that would be fine, depending on the context, if there's a debate you need to give equal time, if you are a newspaper or TV then you can very well ignore the Holocaust deniers -- nobody should be compelled to report crap only because there's "another side". Just like I don't think kids should be taught equal amount of creationism and natu…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:28 AM
3

or better example, giving same amount of time and attention to historians and Holocaust deniers. Or teaching kids creationism and natural evolution in equal amounts because there are two sides.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:24 AM
2

Wow.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:20 AM
-1

It doesn't cost extra money for me. That's what I meant. Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:09 PM
2

Duh, but I also have Amazon Prime and I have stuff for which I pay and stuff that is included, I would have to pay $4.99 extra to see this documentary. So yeah, it's included in price... but since I already have a Hulu subscription it means that is comes for no extra cost for me, I don't have to spend $4.99 to see it. Nitpicking much?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:05 PM
32

Great response, this way I found it's free on Hulu, I'm watching it right now. EDIT: great documentary, highly recommended.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:18 PM
3

An unwanted child will be a burden more or less on the society, somebody needs to provide for it, if not the father then it would be everybody else through taxes, I think I'm fine with fathers being responsible for their acts, if they don't want children they should use condoms. (of course this implies that child born through trickery, perforated condoms and the like should not be the responsibility of the biological father)
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:50 PM
8

The creative team was probably very diverse
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:35 AM
1

I meant that trying to convince the dude that she's a woman. Hey, we are on the internet you take the words at the face value or not, it's your choice...
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:39 PM
1

Debating stupid = waste of time. You should have probably responded with at most one word: whatever.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:28 AM
9

They are all using Macs. No diversity!
/r/MensRights13/04/17 12:36 PM
2

Regardless if what he said is correct or incorrect, I would have thought that in an academic setting people were allowed to be wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:53 PM
2

The future is death.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 07:49 PM
3

News at 11...
/r/MensRights25/02/17 07:16 PM
4

You still compare men to diarrhea...
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:42 PM
30

I still don't like the idea to be compared to diarrhea: "Men -- slightly better than diarrhea"
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:30 PM
49

Where is the grant to get more gender equality in kindergarten and earlier school, or registered nurses?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:29 PM
2

Whoever gets to the door first (or the person who has the hands free) should hold it open.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:57 PM
7

or shopped... since when do you trust random images on the internet.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:30 PM
4

Actually it's only the dude who screwed the mother who profits out of it, one man would be on the hook anyway, the only problem is that's not the right one.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:20 AM
1

I'm not so cynical, we all can vote and influence things (more or less).
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:19 PM
1

A women doesn't have to put her life to risk. So if she does it's all on her... Who gives birth to the child doesn't really matter for who should be able to opt out. Abortion is not "opting out". It's not as simple as: she has the option to opt out so should I. But, yes, if it's in your body you do have the "option" to opt out in any case more than somebody who just contributed to put it there. I garantee there will be less unwanted pregnencies. Thank you kind person on the Internet for giving m…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:06 PM
1

If you're not for equality then your argument makes sense. I'm not for equality when it comes to carrying babies to term, when the men carry it half of time and put their life to risk I will be for equality. Off-topic. Did you know, that overall, only men pay taxes (as a gender). Yes you read that correct, overall men are paying for women already. I am a man, but I don't want to pay taxes for other men's children. It's your prerogative if you want to be a tax-cuck. Did you know, that overall, on…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:45 PM
1

It's not a good choice for a number of reasons: it would shift the burden from the father (who did have unprotected sex with the mother which means that he agreed to the possibility of having a child) to the taxpayers (who didn't fuck anybody). it would encourage more baby killings for financial reasons. just because the woman has an additional option to get rid of the baby, it doesn't absolve the father of his responsibilities if the child gets born.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:41 PM
1

As long as abortion is a legal reality, equality means the possibility for men to sign away his father "rights" and responsibilities. There's no such thing as equality when it comes to birth, there's only one person who is carrying the baby for 9 months and only one person who is risking her life during birth and pregnancy. Also like I said many decisions are very hard to take and are made for life threatening conditions or lack of viability of the baby, so it's not like "she changed her mind" a…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:23 PM
1

Yes, that's how it is. Alimony is idiotic, but the rest, while inconvenient, makes sense. What would you want the man to do: force woman to have abortion? That's obviously not a good choice. wash his hands and say "not my problem"? What do you propose?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:07 PM
1

I think this is slightly a different issue and a longer discussion, I was merely making the point that it's not the man's body, which would make him even less entitled to make a decision regarding abortion. Basically, if (if... I'm not adjudicated here if abortions are OK, although I'm fully pro-choice) anybody is entitled to make a decision is the person who is carrying the baby to term. Many such choices are very hard and are made for medical reason, either because of the risk for the mother-t…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:25 PM
-2

That's a stupid idea for many reasons. If nothing else I don't want to support unwanted kids through my taxes: support them through public schools, medical insurance, and eventually prisons. she should have used a condom or some other birth control. I fully agree, but you can't turn back time, she could get an abortion though, while a man cannot get an abortion. Simple fact. Not to mention that abortions are also for medical reasons not only because "oops, I forgot the pill".
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:22 PM
2

So if a woman gives her child up for adopion, should she still be financial responsible for the child? The moment she puts her child up for adoption or leaves it at a hospital, she leaves her financial responsibilities at the door! That works well for my argument, if the natural parents give the child of adoption they should not be responsible for the child support, we all agree on that. I don't think that decision should and could (as far as I know) made unilaterally by a parent (at least that'…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:13 PM
-16

Of course you don't get to choose, the baby is not growing inside your body. Leaving aside that we talk here about a baby it's like saying "you have the right to cut your hair, why don't I have the right to decide how short is your hair?" Now you are going to ask, but why pay for the child if I didn't want it? That's a good question, but I guess there were two people that conceived the child if you didn't want the child you should have used a condom, I think the idea is that the child is not res…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:35 AM
4

Shitty people thinking they are smart.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:06 PM
-7

Not mein Führer.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:13 PM
-4

Hillary lost, she's out of politics, don't rehash things, we have a turd of a president because of her, just enjoy your Manchurian President...
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:11 PM
4

I think it's telling if he feels emasculated...
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:23 AM
1

Maybe the father thinks the same, who knows, it's irrelevant. Plus is mostly Facebook drama, a post made to provoke reactions (or even fake post to provoke reaction of people that you find on this subreddit)
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:07 PM
4

Again, it's about image, if men died even if somebody claims they were not combatants the reader would not know for sure, but if you point out that women and kids died then it makes the point stronger. To me that's a sign that was written to provoke a reaction, not to provide unbiased info.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:36 PM
7

I think it's a way to point out that non-combatants died. Men whether they had a weapon upon them or not are suspected to be the combatants, children less so, or if they are they are still considered victims.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:30 PM
2

But I thought he was a cunt...
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:12 PM
29

Let me guess "I don't need to be mansplained"
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:52 PM
48

I don't care who are better doctors, men or women, but I wonder if an article claiming that men are better doctors would be given the same neutral or even positive attention... I think the person who'd say that would have their life destroyed, get fired, etc.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:16 PM
1

You are entitled to a reasonable safe environment (and we can discuss what that "reasonable" means) but how you feel can be totally separate from the reality. Feelings are subjective and you cannot force (and should not) force the other people to behave according to your subjective feelings especially if they are not shared by the majority of people. That doesn't mean that you are not entitled to your feelings, it just means that other people are not responsible for them, you are the one who has…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:54 PM
5

Reddit HATES Please shut up with your generalizations.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:39 PM
1

Their front page looks like cancer, do people with self-respect read such crap?
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:44 PM
15

#notallmuslims
/r/MensRights04/12/16 11:48 PM
7

Well, according to the guy there's no such things as biological men, men are probably brain-washed by society into being men. I think that's relevant to mens' rights if people consider that to be a dangerous thing to teach students.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 07:05 PM
1

So there's a pay gap and women are paid less for the same work?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:35 PM
-3

Women are cheaper worker drones But we are constantly repeated here that the pay gap is a myth...
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:32 PM
4

So is this sub ready to become a collection of jokes and memes?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 01:29 PM
1

I agree, but at the same time I know what he promised and I have an idea of what is possible. Even if you think about an issue like healthcare for example, sure "repeal-and-replace Obamacare", but what you put in place? It has a lot of potential to make many people unhappy because it's a complex issue and there are no simple solutions (at least no that I know of). Now, I will be the first person to be happy if Trump solves the healthcare problem in America, I'm afraid though that what is going t…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:13 PM
2

In 4 years people will think that Obama was one of the best presidents. Mark my words, people will get tired of Trump very quickly when they realize he cannot deliver any promise he made but he will deliver a lot of drama.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:04 PM
0

Yeah but those people don't brag about grabbing women by the pussy. Or brag that they can strut around naked women when they change for a contest. You have to face it, Trump is a sexual predator. The next step is to admit that you are fine with that.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:46 AM
0

All sexual predators say "they let me do it". But since you have such a success with the "gals" maybe you know more then me how they like to be grabbed by the pussy by sleazy people.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:15 AM
1

I only wish Republicans would think the same thing about Clinton's emails, Benghazi, and other things she's accused of.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:21 PM
0

He's accused of what he bragged he did.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:51 PM
-1

So if somebody punches you in the face but you decide for some reasons not to press charges then that was a consensual punch?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:45 PM
-1

In some countries it's not a "both sides" issue, that's the point.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:36 AM
-1

And a few years ago, when I had the honor of meeting Malala Yousafzai, who was shot in the head just for trying to go to school, this issue got really personal for me. ... because right now, there are tens of millions of girls like Malala in every corner of the globe who are not in school -- girls who are so bright, hardworking and hungry to learn. Sounds like a legitimate issue to me. Is not about women in Western countries...
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:16 AM
1

Not a great example, but if you wanted a car analogy, I think it like choosing BMW over Volvo, some people think that Volvo is for women (or replace Volvo with a cabriolet or other car that doesn't appeal to men). Also, if somebody stole your wheels once you'll start to think about them when you enter a car... In politics and economy there are people (to your surprise, and no, I won't prove it to you) think that women are not good for leadership roles or even if they are good for that they don't…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:53 PM
2

learn how to make an argument I'm not arguing anything, you are doing the arguing. I just expressed an opinion. Talking of which, what's your opinion, you don't think there are people who vote for Trump because they prefer a man as president? Or, maybe you are a person without opinions and everything you know is based on pure, unadulterated facts.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:13 PM
-1

Anecdotal evidence, strawman! Appealing to emotions!
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:25 PM
-1

"but we need proof!"
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:07 PM
4

Without any specific examples or evidence of such people existing it is still a straw man. I have examples from personal life, sorry I cannot prove them as a proof to a random dude on the internet. But it's telling that you found that incredible. I'm sure you can google and find some similar examples, but I am not inclined to spend my time that way. Also, people are less likely to say openly they discriminate against women (common sense again, no proof, you must be a fun dude to talk to if you a…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:06 PM
2

And I'm just supposed to take your word for that? Don't give a shit what you choose to believe. The burden of proof is on you for making the claim I know that there are people (I wrote "many", but let's not squabble about the number and about the definition of "many", so let's drop the qualifier) that are voting Trump for that reason alone, the opposing idea would that there are no such people. You can't believe P and non-P at the same time, you have to choose one of the options. If you don't be…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:37 PM
4

BS, you claim there are no such people? I personally know a couple of them.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:10 PM
5

I'm not making anybody up, I know personally people who will vote for Trump for that reason alone. Do you claim that there are no people who vote for Trump because he's a man? That would be surprising for everybody to hear. If you cannot claim that then it's not a strawman, at most, I haven't provided concrete proof for something that everybody knows to be true.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:09 PM
1

Still sexist... right? Although Hillary could be a dick too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:39 PM
127

And many vote for Trump because he doesn't have a vagina... people vote for stupid reasons. I dislike this kind of trolling articles.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 01:59 PM
2

The idea is that women don't like sluts (competition?), men don't like sluts (well... not as their long-term partners) that's why it's a slur word. If don't mind promiscuity that's fine, but you have to realize that's not how other people (majority?) in society see it.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:59 PM
7

I haven't felt the need for men-only lounge space at the University. But I think you are missing the point. It's about discrimination, if there were both men-only and women-only lounges I think that would have been fine, strange, but fine. The issue is that you cannot discriminate, you cannot have spaces that can be used only by women (while both men and women pay the same tuition) if you don't provide the same type of facility to the other sex.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:34 PM
5

The reply was "Well it was written by a man so maybe take it up with him?"
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:09 PM
6

or alcohol...
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:32 PM
4

I wouldn't worry, the racist comments are well downvoted...
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:46 AM
1

That is usually called "parody", even if it was done in bad taste and even if there was a danger for people to think she tweeted that (which actually says something about her if a simple denial didn't solve the issue) personally I don't think is something that requires a permanent ban - but that's me, I believe in letting people say things even when you disagree with them.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 11:11 PM
21

Logic is male privilege.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 06:09 PM
2

What age? This is a clear example, do you think that whenever kids 13 and 15 years old have sex the ones that are 13 years old are raped?
/r/MensRights09/07/16 10:13 PM
2

I was still a virgin, maybe a bit taller, 2 years of more experience over your partner doesn't make you a rapist.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:30 PM
1

Doesn't sound like, you were all around similar age and experimented on your own willing, there's no molestation there, they lied about you and behave badly, but by age 43 you probably discovered that many people behave badly.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:20 PM
2

It's not rape, just the fact that you regret something after the fact doesn't make it rape. it was an unpleasant affair carried over by 4 kids who wanted to experiment. The 2 year difference is not relevant neither from the legal point of view, nor from moral POV, it's not like they were mature and you are a child, all the participants were kids. That's something that some women need to learn too, you can regret something, you can even be correct to feel used and it can still not be rape.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:06 PM
2

2 years? I don't know about you, but what I was 13 I used to have a brain, I didn't grow a brain suddenly when I was 15.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:00 PM
-2

And proud of it, he's probably a Republican supporter, doesn't trust "polling elites"
/r/MensRights02/07/16 11:24 PM
1

I've noticed that because I'm a US immigrant, if I was born here I would probably consider the behavior normal.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 09:03 PM
1

I feel so much better that you told me that.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:50 PM
6

People need to cover their asses, that's the national sport in US, especially when it comes to public opinion and lawsuits. "So you mean somebody reported this issue and you didn't do anything about it" Frankly I would do the same in that position, being "fair" is not that important when the downside risk is too big.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 03:49 PM
3

Yeah, yeah #notallmuslims, i know. Well... exactly. There are 1.6 billion Muslims, a quarter of Earth population, if rape would be rampant in the "Muslim culture" (which by the way, is not the same for all Muslims), you'd hear more about it than you do. But why is it that even uber-liberal Germany is having to teach so many of them how to not rape when they get there? Exactly why feminists want to teach men not to rape. I don't see a difference. One generalizes to all the men, the other to "only…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:01 PM
2

Private foundations can do pretty much whatever they want with their money, if they wanted to give scholarship only to tall people they could do that.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:10 PM
2

Rape culture.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:58 PM
14

the victim was a girl though.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:19 PM
-3

I've seen pictures with male-to-woman transition used in the same context "do you want her (boobs and everything) to use the boys' bathroom?" Let's not be over-sensitive...
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:40 PM
-1

It's nothing about attacking in that cartoon, they should have used the word "uncomfortable" instead of "unsafe", but I think they used it as a synonym and mostly for the effect.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:25 PM
2

On the other hand you'd be totally right if you posted here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4gz4j0/why_women_need_the_next_wave_of_feminism/ That has nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:03 PM
1

Not feminist, but that's only one case, you can't extrapolate from one case.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:42 PM
3

Please don't start your post with comments about downvotes. It's a shitty thing to do, yes, even if you are upvoted to the top. Back to the subject: it seems that many posts on this forum are about fake accusation of rape, "rape culture" and in general blanket accusations thrown around about men (think "all men are rapists till proven otherwise") and thus this post would fit in the theme as a counter-point and also as an example of actual disservice to women of that kind of narrative: if you bla…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:40 PM
1

Maybe the guy was distracted catcalling... that's the connection.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:15 PM
1

that aparently doesn't matter... funny, how a true culture of rape is ignored...
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:56 AM
4

White men build the society, the rest of the people have the society inflicted on them -- or at least that's their view...
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:27 PM
0

Only that's not that simple, about half of the people in US believe that abortion is murder, so that means that for many pregnant women the choice is made when the child was conceived. Even if they don't think it's murder it's still not an easy choice for many reasons.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:08 PM
7

Yeah, that's stupid, I don't agree with that since the man is not responsible for the pregnancy in such instances. But that's a different case from the false equivalence presented in this post.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:47 AM
3

Maybe, I don't pretend to know how things should be. To me it looks like the issue is practicality, if a woman (or man for that matter) is the only parent, then somebody needs to help to provide for the kid. And who else than the other person responsible for bringing the kid into the world?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:31 AM
-18

Men can very easily decide not be parents, the only thing they cannot "decide" is to give up the financial obligation that comes from the conception, if the woman decides to keep the baby. That's unfortunate, but I don't see that changing. Personally, I think that if the woman gives birth and then she gives up the baby she should pay child support if the father decides to raise the child (or until the child is adopted).
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:10 AM
-19

sure, would it be nice to just tell women "I changed my mind, or, that was a mistake, you are on your own"
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:00 AM
-16

Things are not equal, a man ejaculates sperm and that's it, that's a bit different than caring a child for 9 month inside your body and giving birth.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:52 AM
8

It's simple, we should teach women not to lie.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:37 PM
5

Because they are discriminated against, that's the line of reasoning.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:51 PM
8

It's a thing for people who live in closed circles with like-minded people and see other people using the word without being challenged on its use.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:22 PM
1

They went to watch Netflix and chill...
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:01 PM
2

An important men's rights issue here....
/r/MensRights08/02/16 06:42 PM
56

Well yeah, retarded people cannot consent.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:14 PM
-5

Is it not accurate?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:33 AM
2

They don't care about women in general, they care about things they can use to advance their advantages, complaining that women are stoned in another country or can't drive doesn't bring them any advantage, plus is a thing that is difficult to solve, so it's understandable that they won't do the hard work for no personal advantage, I would do the same.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:38 PM
0

No it's not, if the fashion industry relies on this, who watches the shows? Somehow I doubt that represents the majority of the models.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:59 AM
1

I don't say it's not unprofessional, I just doubt the "position of power" narrative.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:28 PM
1

exactly my point here
/r/MensRights20/12/15 07:03 PM
-3

position of power over his students That's a bit of bullshit, what, were they afraid they would get an F otherwise? The "position of power" is a bit abused, you need to examine case by case to see if that was really an issue or not. My bet is that it wasn't. Yes, it was a position of responsibility, but let's not get carried away with the "power"....
/r/MensRights20/12/15 07:02 PM
17

It means discriminating against people who are better qualified.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 04:31 AM
14

They are the privilege of the white males.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:38 PM
1

I can see that in some cases, for example "the war on Christmas"
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:29 PM
0

I'm sure Hitler was right sometimes, for example if he said 2+2=4... You can say that about me, I can also defend myself, then all it comes down to credibility and who you incline to believe. Sometime people can be in the wrong and believe the wrong person, shit happens. Also, think Bill Cosby... if a woman accuses him without evidence is one thing, if you have many dozens that say pretty much the same thing you can start to draw your own conclusions.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:35 PM
7

What evidence, that he didn't listen to the safe word, what kind of evidence could she bring? I had no idea what happened, and I'm not inclined to believe either party without good reasons, and no, I'm not going to assume she says the truth, but your "if she cannot bring evidence it didn't happen" is a bit like kids who think you don't see them if they close their eyes -- things happen regardless if you don't hear or see them.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:55 AM
1

In some countries you'd be considered privileged to be able to be so stupid and also have food and shelter...
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:32 AM
4

Only if you are a cunt.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:53 PM
7

ESR is a conspiracy nut. But for famous people this is good advice they should not be alone with women.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:38 PM
9

still better she didn't say "I'm white".
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:34 PM
5

You looked at them haven't you...
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:23 PM
2

And I was explaining how "consent can be revoked at any time, turning a consensual sex act into rape" can be consistent with "rape is about power", what was not clear in my explanation? It's actually rather simple: woman says stop, the guy get a thrill from power and continues. Or even clearer: sex turns too rough, woman says 'stop', guy doesn't listen. See... it's about power. Do you try to understand the argument or try to prove it's not valid? I think you fail at either tasks. And I'm saying …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:14 PM
2

I think it can, for example some people like to play "rape fantasy" during sex, it's not inconceivable that if the partner revokes consent the rapist might feel a surge in pleasure by enforcing their power, playing out their rape fantasy for real that time. Also, things are fluid when it comes to human behavior, just like a game can turn into fight for kids, sex can turn into rape. It's not impossible, nor it contradicts that view that rape is about power. As for "rape is about power" personally…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:39 PM
0

I'm sure that thread solved the issue once and for all...
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:59 PM
2

I don't believer that rape is about power, that kind of sounds narrow-minded. But not stopping when the partner revokes consent shows a lack of consideration for the other person, so it's not inconsistent with this (flawed in my opinion) theory, or at least with exercising power without care for the other person, which is in my opinion probably closer to truth than "rape is about power".
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:15 PM
5

I guess we should teach women not to rape...
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:07 PM
4

Not with the fedora on though...
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:38 PM
2

Accusations need to be investigated, if there's risk for public or risk to mishandle the evidence or influence the witnesses (like in case of police) the leave of absence is motivated and OK it doesn't mean that we established that the priest or officer is guilty. In case of Hope Solo I don't think there's a danger for her team members, so this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:06 PM
3

Especially when they are not convicted. People should be considered innocent till found guilty in a court of law.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:30 PM
1

Since you commented and not just downvoated like the rest of the bitches I will make some effort to explain better what I meant. First of all I can't say I would be a fan of people who express sexual desires on Facebook. The kind of people who say "I would love to see him in his boxers" or "I would love to see her in a tight t-shirt", that's equally bad, but my point is that we should not shoot for equal censorship and equal political correctness by using the lowest common denominator, and becom…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:01 PM
-5

People here bitch about political correctness imposed from one side, but actually they are not against forcing political correctness down the throat of people, they just want equal opportunity to do it.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:45 PM
-1

Not unless you are politically incorrect apparently, people here bitch about political correctness imposed from one side, but actually they are not against forcing political correctness down the throat of people, they just want equal opportunity to do it.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:45 PM
-25

I'm a man and I would say he looks hot, what's the big deal? People should learn to deal with other people's opinions without throwing fits.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:09 PM
4

I don't agree with this request, it's a gross overreaction to an unwise move by reddit (also singling out one of the people responsible, Alexis and the rest of the mods are just as responsible), but think about something, the business of reddit is us posting, if we were not here posting it would be no reddit, so yeah, users can demand stuff when they are the ones who make the company work. The only thing this will fail because there's not big support and people will wrongly assume people support…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:03 PM
21

She needs to report them, even if nothing happens next time when they do that nobody will be able to tell "it's the first time we hear they did that..."
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:46 PM
2

You need to report them, even if nothing happens next time when they do that nobody will be able to tell "it's the first time we hear they did that..."
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:46 PM
-1

For what is worth the men kill each other (and commit suicide) over women...
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:39 AM
5

I guess people heard Colbert talking about truthiness and they din't understand that he was joking.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:45 PM
21

"Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons" women are the real victims, the husbands, fathers, sons are just irrelevant.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:34 PM
1

Or pray for them... tough choice.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:12 PM
4

It's a very well thought response, very logic and it stroke a right tone throughout the speech. One thing about men being more in danger than women, that's obviously true, but it's also not mentioned that the source of danger is also mostly men (not that it changes the fact itself, but it gives an explanation why many women see this the issue of safety in a "us vs. them" light).
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:05 PM
8

Yes, 'cause what's sexier than a guy who decapitates people or burns them alive... personally I'm glad that these dipshits are going to get what they deserve sooner or later.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:30 AM
1

Yes, I'm retarded.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:14 PM
1

It makes it better for women... And if it doesn't make "something better", does it make it worse? Using the "free market" argument it doesn't seem to.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:06 PM
-1

You used the word "always" first, please explain what you mean by "always" first... How much is the duration of always for you, 10 years? 30? 50? I could see white people feeling discouraged now to try to be good in the 100 m event, but that's a relatively recent thing, from what I see whites were winning till 1980, so it's obviously not "always" unless you mean by always 30 something years. I guess it depends how old you are if you are younger than 30 then yes, I can see why that's "always" for…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:04 PM
2

The argument assumes the existence of a perfect market. I have my doubts about the perfection of the market especially when it comes to CEOs and board members, it might be better when it comes to general employment, but evaluating CEOs performance is a bit problematic, you can see CEOs that buried a company being hired by other companies or at least being well respected in the business world. Also the enormous salaries point to less of an efficient market, you'd think that they could find somebo…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:37 PM
0

always?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:22 PM
1

The problem with the argument is the video is that 100 m event is a very clear and easily quantifiable, people's performance is not. Also, the white sprinters were not discriminated in the past (it was actually the other way round). I can see men being promoted in the past only because women were not available for the position or because people felt more comfortable with the idea that men are better leaders. On the other hand the video touches on an interesting contradiction in the feminist disc…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 04:01 PM
2

Asshole is gender neutral
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:50 PM
-1

Men don't have feelings so it's not a problem if you call them fat.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:40 PM
5

Just curious, ff you were a middle class female in Sweden I don't think you'd be any way worse off, am I right?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:40 PM
1

It would be "you are comfortable where you are because of the feminists before you" and I guess they wouldn't be totally wrong. (but not only because of "feminists", there are enough non-feminists who agree that women should vote and have equal rights and so on)
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:35 PM
2

Not an argument, but a legitimate question: if men have it better, as many people claim, why do they commit more suicides, why are they most likely to be homeless? (edit: actually this is silly, it's about small section of male population that ends up in the street or commit suicide, it doesn't tell much about the general population)
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:02 PM
3

It's not the marriage, it's the kid. If the guy had the kid outside of the marriage he would still have to pay up.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter