TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ausertoremember Archive

View 6 posts and 46 comments by ausertoremember on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Lucky or Not Go to prison. Do not pass by the bank. Do not collect rewards. This card should really be: Men in prison for 2 turns Women in prison for 1 turn
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:28 PM
6

So brainwashed... FYI - this an organization funded by Goverment of Canada (through EDC) with taxpayer dollars... anyone have any thoughtful critiques? Almost everything they used in the game that I saw was a twisted version of the fact.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:19 PM
1

Just FYI - being on TRT doesn't preclude you from being able to impregnate someone. Lots of guys have reported getting their partners pregnant while being on TRT.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:27 PM
2

I personally don't see value in traditional gender roles in the current world. I've even thought that gender shouldn't be part of our identity, other than for medical reasons We have this already, its called sex. But I agree, we should be working towards societies where gender-grouping and identification are not important at all.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:17 PM
5

Girl Scouts are actually unhappy with this change as it puts even more pressure on their numbers. Both Girl and Boy scouts have had declining enrollment for some time.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:22 PM
1

That is what they are basing this on in Canada, I’d be really interested in seeing any sources you may have that show women drivers as more expensive to insure in the US. Men, especially young men, are more likely to be involved in collisions than women in Canada, and that’s universal across all Canadian provinces.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:20 PM
2

You bring up an interesting point on the indoctrination children are subjected to. Child GM is so morally clear to me: none of your rights to religious freedom are infringed at all by upholding another person's (your child) superseding human rights. However, taking that further - I've often wondered when we're going to get to the point that we consider ideological indoctrination of children some form of child abuse. Research shows how malleable we are at a very young age, so I would say that str…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:55 PM
12

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it now: how are laws protecting someone else’s human rights ever an infringement on your own personal religious rights ?
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:31 PM
2

Top comments are a personal experience of a botched procedure causing a baby to have to have a transfusion and second top: "I hope Europe follows in banning this barbaric practice"
/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:01 PM
2

Discussion on the Iceland ban of circumcision in the France subreddit is quite positive. Goes to show how far behind we are here in NA on this topic.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:59 PM
2

This piece seems like fear-mongering. The author must be from such a privileged class to be able to write an opinion piece like this, given that there are so many more important and far-reaching issues to tackle for both men and women in our society.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:40 AM
1

It “is” a steroid. The first “steroids” users were just takin supra physiological amounts of the anabolic steroid testosterone. You are right, women’s natural levels of testosterone are someone like a tenth the level of men’s natural levels.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:59 PM
1

That isn’t physically possible unless the coffee was in a pressurized vessel. the coffee couldn’t have been hotter than about ~100C at 1ATM, you can check this by bringing a saucepan of coffee to boil on the stove and measuring the temperature.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 08:13 PM
18

You should do a bit more research on that case.... she was unable to consent, incapacitated, not just drunk. Witnesses were key to the successful prosecution. He did not 'get away with it'. The shit-storm that ensued was due to the lenient sentencing handed down by the judge. You may also recall that his father read a statement (or provided to the court) that his swimming was in jeopardy. MSM thought that was inappropriate. So, yes - you missed quite a bit.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:24 AM
1

I remember reading the article and I believe that we essentially live in a world where gender and sex are inseparable wrt to 'studies'. Yes, we can definitively say that male and female brains are structured differently, but we cannot say how much of that is due to socialization (ie gender) and how much of that is due to sex. Its back causation vs correlation. Studies of infants show that gender is impacted on them from basically the time they are born. Early transitioned trans-gender people wou…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:34 PM
1

I think what you're thinking of is factors that affect sentencing and not culpability.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:24 PM
10

Black and brown out drunk does not in any way imply that they person was not able to consent. My current partner never appears too drunk and is highly functional yet has brownouts very often. That is simply not a good test for someone to use to determine ability to consent.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:17 AM
17

To make a point using an example from my life: in college a friend videotaped bits and pieces of a party and there was footage of me 1 canvassing the group to order pizza 2 drunkenly hitting on several girls 3 making out with a girl on the dance floor The embarrassing parts that I was in I either don't remember or only remembered after seeing the video. I brought dance floor girl home that night and my memory is very hazy, I remember grabbing condoms and bits and pieces of the 'event'. I woke an…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:15 AM
7

No, the other party does not matter, legally. If they are able to consent, then it is not rape. Morally it is wrong, and I think we should strive for a better standard, but criminally that's the way it is.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:04 AM
14

Their ability to consent is not nullified if they are 'under the influence' of alcohol. That is the point, 'consent' is 'consent', the state of the other party does not matter. If they are unable to consent then it is rape, ie inebriated beyond a point at which they are able to lawfully consent, which Is up to the courts to determine, but the standard is much higher than under the influence of alcohol.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:02 AM
1

irrespective *
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:01 PM
1

Parental refers to the non birth mother, so for adoptive parents both would be treated that way. Similarly for lesbian couples, only one is eligble for maternity, the other parental. It's just to say that we should have some time that is reserved for each parent's exclusive use. A small percentage of the total though. Maternity maybe 17 makes sense, but for parental say 6 or 8? Just an idea.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:00 PM
1

The chart is wrong in that Quebec does offer leave that is exclusively available for parental leave, but otherwise, in Canada the chart is correct. All the leave is shared, except 17 weeks exclusive to the birth mother
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:28 PM
1

This is is leave only acailable to the father. Quebec's imsurance has some reserved for exclusive use by the father - it's use it or lose it. The perxemtage replacement of is much higher aa well so the percemtage lf men who use the program vs ROC is something like triple. These programs should help close the choice based wage gap.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:25 PM
2

Bursaries is what they called them in my day , they should still be meeting minimum academic requirements, but yeah for me SES based, equalizing opportunity is important.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:31 PM
1

hardship == low income, low socioeconomic status, poorly performing scho districts etc.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:37 PM
1

I don't have a problem with scholarships that are based on need, ie restricting to people who come from legitimate hardship. Its equalizing opportunity.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:37 PM
1

I thought one of his problems, specifically, was the idea of accommodating a person by referring to them with essentially made up pronouns. The analogy of the women with entering with a hijab does not reflect what his position it.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:57 PM
1

it sounds like male passengers are actually welcome. which makes sense, as that would be even more blatent (i.e., no blacks!) but still discrimination against the drivers.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:51 PM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:41 AM
8

Its funny because feminists dont bat at eye at articles like this, even agreeing with - but imagine the uproar if men were painted with the same brush! Oh, the patriarchy, they'd say, or how disgusting men are. Yet here we have a great example of blatant sexism and of men behaving more like humans in general.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:40 AM
1

what about "i raise my son like i would raise my daughter and i raise my daughter like i would raise my son"? i dont see anything inherently wrong with raising our children to think that their gender doesnt define who they choose to be
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:29 AM
1

sorry i misread your comment the first time, my other reply was responding to what i thought you said
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:57 AM
1

its not about white or black, and its not about choice its 1 we dont serve you due to your gender and 2 we dont hire you because of your gender. While I wish we were in a place where one didnt have a preference for the gender of your driver (some pious people would not be driven by women) having the choice isnt the case nor the problem
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:56 AM
1

there are barber shops but I don't think they explicitly serve men nor discriminate officially in their hiring of barbers.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:02 AM
1

sorry, male infants are not accepted.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:30 PM
10

It probabaly wouldnt be for men to start a similar service
/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:25 PM
2

And the presupposition of this business model is that female passengers cannot trust male driver's, its not safe! It hysterics plain and simple, I'm sure the statistics would show that there are far less-safe spaces for women than the back of a taxi cab with a male driver. Ugh.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:11 PM
2

I mean, I've heard off-hand 'jokes' about me wanting to take an equal amount of time as my partner for paternity leave, from both men and women... its annoying and is hurtful to, for the sole reason of my gender, assume that I'm less valuable as a parent or caregiver. I could completely see someone with different personality just avoiding those societal pressures completely by altering their choices. I think that's a bad thing. And I completely agree that it, to this day, is difficult for men to…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:37 PM
1

yet another reason why men can't freely choose that profession, but no one bats an eye.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:59 PM
1

How do we solve the problem of men not being able (as brought in in a post a couple days back) having to fight tooth and nail to become primary school teachers? Seriously, what is the solution there? I very much dislike affirmative action, which what we're discussing kind of smells like, and so a solution to this would apply to many other areas of our world that AA gets used.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:58 PM
2

Yet, we only seem to recognize and work to effect change for industries in which women are historically underrepresented. We can all agree that there is a huge disparity in the way society treats women entering historically male careers compared to men entering historically female careers. A male nurse vs a female engineer... society does not view them the same :(
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:42 PM
2

There certainly is a lot of feminist dogma regarding the loaded statement 'disadvantaged' wrt women, but do you not agree that the first women doctors, scientists, lawyers, engineers didn't have to fight against social stigmas to break into those industries in the last 50-75 years? Regardless off why we were in that situation, for those women the choice of career path was made more difficult by society at the time.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:38 PM
2

:D I agree with the sentiment that (if in this case the analogy means that society should be the one tasked with building another bench, or even making entire bench taller) why should society be tasked with doing that? I am all for equality of opportunity; i.e. we should all be able to choose what we want to do and that goes both ways, but I think for this analogy to work we'd have to say that the fence is higher at one point than the the other. (Easy example, male primary school teachers fighti…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:35 PM
2

I was thinking when she said it, basically that people probably wouldn't have a problem with: "The future is Black" but someone with the t-shirt "The Future is White" would be labeled a neo-nazi or white supremacist.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:01 PM
4

She didn't say that, that was me adding color to what I thought she was implying. I think she believes that, historically, women have been disadvantaged, and still have a ways to go.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter