TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

avstylez1 Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by avstylez1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Because there isn't a market for them.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:08 PM
1

The thinner guy was also a professional fighter. He treated the whole thing like a joke because he has decades of grappling training. But hard to see why the match went this way.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:19 PM
1

I think the reason men don't hit women is not necessarily about strength but power. Historically men have been the head of a household, we're able to vote when women couldn't, had jobs when women didn't, so had most of the decision making power in a marriage. Women were not even able to divorce because society saw the "sanctity of the marriage" as more important than individual choice in most places. So as such, it was societal convention the "kinds of men" who would hit a woman, who was largely…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:17 PM
1

Look for attributes beyond the physical. Similar values, competencies, personality. Date someone for an extended period before moving in or getting married. Make sure they're right for you and are a good partner.. similarly, when dating, try to resist the urge to pretend you're someone else or the person you're with won't actually know you until later and then it might not work.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 07:27 PM
1

They got married, easy solution, don't get married and sign a pre nup
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:00 PM
5

It's both, many would argue the emotional issues far outweigh the physical tasks
/r/MensRights03/07/21 07:25 PM
2

I don't know what kind of emotional labor she is talking about according to the post, just that a lot of people here are kind of attacking it in general which I think is misplaced because an emotional burden can be rough.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 07:24 PM
72

All labour is difficult and needs to be respected. Emotional labour can be crippling, just like physical labour. For example vicarious trauma or caring for someone who is disabled or behavioral can burn someone out faster than a 12 hour roofing job. We need to respect all forms of labour so that we can look out for one another, it's not a competition
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:20 PM
7

Didn't work, I still trust my wife. But this kind of stuff is trash. Like Cosmo, not be taken seriously
/r/MensRights04/05/20 11:19 AM
1

Ya, wealth, fame and power tend to get people off in a lot of cases
/r/MensRights03/05/20 08:03 PM
1

Because it's a pointless argument. There no point and no good to come of it. And you could substitute pretty much any neural article in its place to try to rile up outrage or support. I'm all for mens right and will speak to them but I'm not about trying to light a fire with waterlogged wood
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:48 PM
3

Sure they did, the article specifically says that it was 43 men who took it upon themselves to do then"live in" production session.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 06:22 PM
2

What outcome do you mean? How does this post produce a good outcome for us. The article is good, and the men bbn in it amazing, but theres no attacking on men in there. They were given a positive spotlight. Why try to frame in t as a negative
/r/MensRights30/04/20 12:13 PM
-4

But there was no feminist attempt to mock men here
/r/MensRights30/04/20 12:07 PM
-6

Okay but how does a post like this help anything? You're making an issue when there wasn't one before. That's a similar tactic the groups you are advocating against might use
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:49 AM
0

Am I missing something? Is someone actually saying these guys are toxic or something?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:41 AM
8

So all of society agrees that boys can be raped, molested and abused, but for some reason men cant? At what point in our development exactly do we suddenly become rape proof. Wtf has your prof been smoking?
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/20 09:18 PM
0

Minimum fit statutory rape is 8 years for a child over the age of 12. Its 12 year minimum for a child under 12.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:27 PM
1

That's not true, in the US statutory rape is dependent on age. Under 12, the minimum is 12 years, over 12 (which the victim was) is 8 years minimum. So 20 for over 12 is actually fairly moderate
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:27 PM
1

What leads you to think I'm anti man. In this situation, many on this thread wrongly assumed their was no consequence, I provided that information. Everything else you said I agree with. Statistically.men do get harsher and more abundant sentences. I never said the contrary. Stop trying to pick a fight when I simply corrected some false assumptions. Don't try to polarize an issue to a moderate.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:23 PM
1

I agree with ya. Its super traumatizing and will impact this boys whole life. Maybe one day we will take all discretionary powers away from our obviously witless judges and relegate sentencing to mob justice. Until then we will have to be content wit the fact that this woman did not simply get off as many people here have alluded to and did in fact receive a fairly steep consequence
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:22 PM
2

No not really, but since murder is 25, its damn close. My point was not to nitpick the severity if already severe sentences, but rather that there was certainly a severe sentence befitting of a severe crime, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:10 PM
1

Yes you're right, punishments are certainly not dolled out equally. Judges have a ton of discretion. Violent rape seems to receive much harsher punishments(which in my opinion they should). For example a 40 year old man in the us was convicted of a violent rape of a 12 year old girl and sentenced to 40 years. Conversely, rape involving abusive use of power such as a boss using power over a subordinate does not receive similar punishments, I've seen as low a release on parole.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 01:55 PM
7

Now that's not to say men dont get harsher sentencing. I ha vfc e read many articles which show they do. I just refuse to believe that women would simply get off Scott free for paedophilia
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:49 AM
7

I think people often dont do enough follow up. As in this case, people didnt look to see how the trial went. We just year of an offense, read a bunch if comments indicating she'll get off, and then assume that's what happened.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:46 AM
4

As does this woman. Well 20 years +lifetime probation and on the sex offender registery
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:44 AM
13

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.azcentral.com/amp/1693827001 Do you have a source for stats on this sort of thing which supports that that is how it goes most of the time? I just hate assumptions based on personal beliefs. I dont find them useful
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:40 AM
13

Ya, and according to the first article I read on this subject, the boy's father received menacing texts festoon her husband staring they should fight to settle it instead of going to court. That POS should be charged as well
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:27 AM
11

Ya I looked that up, glad she got what was deserved. Annoys me that people on this sub assume she'd just get off for rape
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:23 AM
10

Her name is Brittany Zamora and she is serving a 20 year sentence for rape.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:17 AM
22

But she did go to jail, she's serving a 20 year sentence. The judge called it rape and the two boys involved have access to ongoing psychological counseling. Seems like they treated it as a rape so not sure where you're getting this information from. Maybe just to stir the pot?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:16 AM
68

Good stuff. Everyone should have access to support.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 03:25 AM
1

Well that is some distorted ass logic
/r/MensRights23/04/20 02:31 AM
1

And it might be. My point wasn't that it continues to be relevant, only that it once was. Just like other ideological branches have given something a bad name doesn't make it so. Feminist raised the status of women from objects to participants in society. It founded the suffrage movement which allowed women to vote and join the military. Now there are extremists, as there is in the church, in politics, in virtually every major system. So we need to avoid hating or generalizing opinions to a whol…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:14 PM
1

Okay, glad that was your takeaway
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:03 PM
0

Maybe, I dunno, I've never really experienced that sort of gender divide. I think online blows things up and makes them seem a lot more polarizing than they are. I do think that generalizing to an entire population is wrong, whether that be towards men or women. I want women to be assertive, and men to be as well. But that does not mean pushing your values on others. Feminism as a movement wasn't evil, much like socialism or even communism at its base. But these ideologies get manipulated by sma…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:27 PM
4

Yes I do consider myself lucky. My only point is that it's not all women or that they are magically "hard wired " to not be attracted to men who are confident in their emotions. They do exist and its just a societal issue to train them otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:21 PM
3

Maybe it's just the women I interact with I dunno, or the area but were all pretty supportive of each other here. It's a pretty liberal place cause we are a university city. So I guess ive just never encountered the opposite
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:16 PM
4

Nah, that's simply not true. All woman are different and tons of them are completely able and willing to support men and their feelings. The spices will taste good and survive regardless.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 01:55 PM
9

That's a huge generalization. Like all men, women are all different. Some cultures and families might teach woman to be like this and many many don't. The men in my family are strong and successful and completely secure in sharing how we feel. My wife is awesome and listens. She's can be the strong one when I need her to be and vice versa.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 01:52 PM
1

Not at all. However the systems we have always have likewise made hires based solely on merit impossible. If you look at most political makeup around the world over the past 30 years, they were overwhelmingly Male. Woman in politics will often have more credentials than their make counterparts and get overlooked. That's because those parties favour (whether consciously or not) male candidates and thus invest more to endorse them. Policies to level the playing field may not be the best path, but …
/r/MensRights15/04/20 03:21 PM
1

Ya I think I'm with you on this one. Politics is rarely about merit and more about image, connections and power. I think a lot of people throughout history were not even close to the "best for the job" and we know that in certain places the "old boys club" is still fairly strong. I hate initiatives which favour people based off of non merit related qualities, but let's face it, it's never been about merit in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:28 PM
1

Well that's a whole different kettle of fish as that's not really income from working but the distribution of family wealth. Similar to how if a family was together, they wouldn't count it as new income when they share wealth
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:08 PM
2

Agreed, much better to hear out the fullest of people's perspectives so that it limits misunderstandings
/r/MensRights11/04/20 04:11 AM
3

Nope, which is why I asked to be educated. I haven't seen anything that supports that woman are evolutionarily less confrontational, but I have read research such shows they go about confrontation differently. I also have a research paper from Harvard, which looked at the differences in how men and woman negotiate and assert themselves. You can find it in here https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/08/resolving-conflict-men-vs-women/
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:34 AM
3

If you go back to the top of the convo, I did nicely ask for sources without getting confrontational at all. Dude told me her didnt need any evidence cause science obviously. That's when I dug in. So in effect I did give him the benefit of the doubt and invited him to educate me. He chose to back up his rhetoric with a pseudo authority "evolutionary psychology", so I called him out.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:26 AM
1

You seem to know an awful lot about this colleague's life . Is it possible this isn't just a random woman but rather someone you gave some history with?
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:13 AM
3

Why? We should just accept people shutting down our discussion point because they say "trust me bro, science that's why". It cant work that way in conversation else no one has to use evidence, just rhetoric
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:54 AM
1

I'm not sure what else stops people from using "well cause science" as an argument unless you let them know that you also understand science. I'm through with that bs trying to pass as valid discussion. Make a logical point or dont, but appealing to random "evolutionary psychology" as a talking point shouldn't cut it
/r/MensRights11/04/20 01:01 AM
1

It's sad when asking for facts gets you that label lol
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:40 AM
2

I didnt say any of that. Of course things that dont impact directly on us are worth fighting for. But what you missed is that you need to look at each issue and decide its personal relevance to you. Its significant and how important to you that you see it changed. My dude was asking how to avoid the rage pill. If you get worked up by every global issue, you'll die early
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:19 AM
1

Ya and I also studied evolution and am a psych major. I also dont just go around tossing generalizations as facts and expect people to buy them
/r/MensRights10/04/20 11:20 PM
0

Sure, random non supported made up version of evolutionary psychology
/r/MensRights10/04/20 11:17 PM
0

Whoever generalizes that to women, in that they avoid confrontation, has not met my wife or family lol. Can you site the research about that? I'd love to see that as a gender difference
/r/MensRights10/04/20 10:54 PM
1

How did you get there from what I said? Did someone piss in your cornflakes this morning grumpy guss?
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:06 PM
2

I guess. I've heard that term in a lot of different circumstances regardless of gender. "Toxic boss", "toxic boyfriend", "toxic environment". I think that's just a flavor of the moment when people want to be dramatic about interpersonal relationships
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:22 PM
9

Or maybe that was one individual who didn't jive with the other workers. I we need to be cautious using one anecdote to try to generalize to an entire population. Just like we don't appreciate when society does that with us.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 04:26 PM
5

True enough, there are a ton of factors that would be very difficult to control for. Skill in negotiation is often one that is touted as a deciding factor which is fairly controversial. It's a difficulty one to test, and there are theories which suggest that the reason men generally negotiate higher wages is because their bosses are also more likely to be men. This might lead to bias, however I'm more likely to assume that men simply feel more comfortable negotiating with a man than a woman migh…
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:27 PM
5

Ya that's interesting. I wonder if that has to do with mens threshold for risk vs women. Or perhaps that since women sociologically are entrusted with more childcare, elder parent care, and dependents in general, that they would opt for more security in the form of benefits. It's a cool area of study, and I feel like it would explain a lot. Much better to understand the subtle nuances than paint matters as black and white as some try to.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:21 PM
2

I think its important to think how these larger macro issues impact upon you directly and then make the decision as to whether or not its important enough to you to do something about. All of us love a good bitch fest, but often its about things that have never impacted upon us directly, just that we think its unfair. There a lot to rage over in society, but by in large I dont think its worthwhile to always point out the things that are broken, as clearly there's quite a bit of structures that w…
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:13 PM
4

Do you happen to have a study which demonstrates a difference in how men and women with the same qualifications and experience choose companies differently? I'd love to read that as I have obviously read that men and women gon into different fields, but not that they'd also make different choices once in the same field.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:10 PM
8

I wasn't arguing the point, I actually figured this number was helping and more reasonable than most. I understand all of your points and agree.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:12 PM
73

In Canada (where I live) there still a very slight pay gap even when adjusted for the same job, qualifications and level of experience. Its only 4 cents on the dollar so it's very slight, but we've still not been able to explain why this occurs. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5097399/gender-pay-gap-2019-canada-glassdoor/amp/
/r/MensRights10/04/20 11:18 AM
11

I get what you're trying to do with this considering how the movie poster looks but your point is a huge misrepresentation. Just watch the trailer. But adults are not the parents, and are not together. Their friends die and leave them a kid even though they're not a couple. Both adults are not ready for it and ate immature and childish. She drinks a ton of wine in the movie and is not what you'd think of as a good mom at the start either. It's a shit movie but don't try to make issues where ther…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:04 AM
-11

K, but why do either of those things matter? I mean trump has a brain injury and looks like an orangutan but people elected him president.
/r/MGTOW31/12/19 11:54 PM
3

I'd argue that's a pretty big presumption of to generalize this way of thinking to all parents, much less a human trait in general. Some people think this way, sure, but I think calling it a human trait just normalizes that way of thinking
/r/MensRights24/12/19 02:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter