TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

awbitethebullet Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by awbitethebullet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You know, this shit is just sad.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:04 AM
-2

You sound just like Paul Elam, an old perv with a blog. Maybe you are Elam and sockpuppeting. You'd love to get the site closed down because you have a martyr complex. I think this subreddit is going to get along just fine without your hate and weirdness.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:48 AM
1

This article doxes people in violation of reddit's policies and has been reported.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:51 PM
-8

Holy shit. if you have to go 52 years back to look for trouble, you're not going to have any cred today. Besides Solanas, who was mentally disturbed, there isn't much of a violent feminist presence at any point I can think of. Is that why she keeps being brought up after half a century?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:07 AM
2

Cool, Alaisdair, what kind of help? Was women's money involved. for instance. or did you get help only from family, or what?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:13 PM
-4

Those are the only comments worth reading. :)
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:45 AM
-14

He (or she) should be able to give up all parental rights and responsibilities. But if he wants to keep his options open and negotiate child support, custody, and visitation, the payment schedules are not as draconian as you assume. Nobody is saying this is a good situation.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:35 AM
-2

I'll let the commenters and readers judge my clarity. I will state again: a statutory rape case is difficult and complex. Retain an experienced lawyer who cares about you as a human being and will help you think about your future as a parent, not just saving a few bucks. Good luck.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:24 AM
-4

I can only judge people here by what they say. Mr. Harlan can consider the merits of what I have said and alter his position, reject my position, or accept it. I'm not getting a picture of someone who knows how the judicial system actually works so far. I'm getting an ex-husband with a chip on his shoulder. But he can change my mind if he looks at the substance of what I have said and acknowledges that I'm speaking for men and their children and that he's been too rigid here.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:09 AM
-33

If you were focused on the boy who was raped, you would be concerned about the fact that he is a father, and that may mean something to him, and he may want to know his child. All you're focused on is fucking over the mother at the expense of the victim and the child. You sound like you want to foreclose all possibilities to the victim to get to know his child.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:59 AM
-14

Uh huh. Your credentials? You know, I have to ask myself what the commenters here really want. You don't give a shit about the young male victim and what he might want. You don't want him to have any options. I've been downvoted to oblivion for championing his right to assert parental rights later in life. You couldn't care less about the child who will be born and need a father. All the commenters here seem to care about is complaining that the victim might in some fantasy world get stuck with …
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:32 AM
-10

Are you reading these comments? Please enter the modern world and stop robotically reciting prejudices as if they had a basis in fact.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:17 AM
-19

You're pompous and dogmatic. Your "shoulds" aren't based on long experience. I get that you're young and I'm trying to make allowances, but it's hard not to see you in a starched shirt and a giant mustache. You got your ass kicked once in court, maybe, and you think you can now tell all other men out there what to do. No. In fact they should hire experienced counsel and ignore you.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:07 AM
-17

So it's cool for the children of such unions to suffer. Is it like original sin or something? Are they, like tainted? Isn't the best thing for those babies to have a father who turns 18 and realizes he wants to know his child and gets into the system and maybe gets custody? (HE HAS THE CHOICE, HE DOESN'T HAVE TO, BUT HE CAN IF HE WANTS TO). From you I get a cold generalization that babies ought to suffer for their mothers' wrongdoing, starve even.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:57 AM
-3

No. He's a victim, and she's a predator, and everybody will get that, and they'll be very likely to grant him some form of custody. Judges are used to having to consider the nuances of specific situations. Here's a weird one. The rapist married the boy and they and their 2 kids lived, I guess, happily ever after.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Kay_Letourneau I bring this up because I think we all have to understand that this stuff isn't easy, or susceptible to ideology or generalities. I perso…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:46 AM
-2

Not necessarily, as I keep saying. The victim can grow up and then sue for custody and there will be a lot of sympathy for him. No reason he would not get custody and she would then be ordered to pay him child support. Again, it should be up to him. I do agree that if this victim does not assert parental rights he must not have any financial responsibility whatsoever.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:30 AM
-1

No, I don't say he should have the financial responsibility if he doesn't want it. I say if he wants to have a parental relationship, he should be allowed to have it. That will include determinations of custody, visitation, and child support. My aim is to get the victim a relationship with his child, if he wants it, and only if he wants it. You sound like a kid who only gets the money aspect and doesn't understand what it feels like to be a parent with no access to his child. Let's talk again in…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:17 AM
-17

Yeah, watch out for lawyers, they tend to actually know what's going on, unlike naive ideologues like you.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:07 AM
-10

Which is why I keep emphasizing that the young father, upon reaching majority, should be allowed to assert parental rights, which will include matters of custody, visitation, and child support if he does not have full custody and the circumstances warrant. Of course if he does not choose to assert parental rights that should also be up to him.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:57 AM
-1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGyeuCEAyWU&list=RD02h3spzqDRx_I Your evidence to the contrary?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:46 AM
-9

Ass, you are. I am not a girl. And I'm talking about minimizing the harm to the victim by keeping his options open and allowing him to assert parental rights at time of majority, including, potentially, custody rights. You're fixated on fucking over the woman to the extent that you don't seem to give a shit about the victim. I do care. I have represented people like this, and it's complex, and people need to keep their options open. Again, 8 minute delay, I'm hamstrung. So good night.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:36 AM
-16

Read my lips. No forcing. An option. So the rapist doesn't get to have the child and prevent all contact. Bad for child and father (once father reaches age of majority). Real situation: father will not have visitation/custody without exposure to child support laws (at time of majority). Best of bad situation: let young father decide at time he reaches 18. You know, from these benighted and rigid comments I wonder if some of us have let ideology blind us to reality. It almost sounds like you're s…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:26 AM
-19

A lawyer who has handled a lot of criminal and custody cases. And you? Reddit has put me on an 8 minute delay because of downvoting, so I'm out. Too bad we can't continue the conversation. Have a great evening.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:16 AM
-16

True, 2 innocent children, thanks. And now what? OK, you were 15, so she gets the child. Like that?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:06 AM
-9

It's a big deal. I said it's a tragedy. So is losing your child to your rapist because some asshole got a law passed forbidding you from taking responsibility for your child later in life and having a parental relationship.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:05 AM
-2

Good to see an attempt at engagement.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:03 AM
-14

You sound like a naive ideologue.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:00 AM
-22

I don't think he should be forced, agree with you there. What I'm saying is that the boy, if he exists, which he apparently doesn't, as you seem to have invented this story, should have the option when he reaches majority of deciding to have a relationship with his child or not (which would include exposure to child support). Turning this around, you're saying that the rapist should get full custody and be able to deny the father all rights.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:59 AM
-6

Whatever you say, man.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:57 AM
2

Holy shit. I just wasted an hour of my time assuming I was responding to a true news item. This shit has to stop.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:56 AM
-18

What? Is this story fiction? Did you post a fiction and pretend it was true?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:55 AM
-12

I would let the victim have all his possible options. It's a bad situation all around. He's going to be reminded all his life, because there will be a human being out there he fathered. The question is, would you legally foreclose any chance of him ever having a chance to know his child? Because there will be no visitation without him acknowledging he is the father and entering the child support system. Seems to me like a double victimization to deny him this option. Of course, many victims won'…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:47 AM
-17

The money would go to his child's support. Or not, as you say. No child support (when he starts working at a later age), no relationship with his child. See?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:41 AM
-16

Because it can't go both ways, see? No responsibility when this victim reaches majority, no child support, no son. OK. Or, he wants to have a relationship, he wants to be "on the hook". But he can't, because the law says he can't be the father due to his underage status at time of conception. Bad job all around, but I think best to keep options open and look at each situation individually.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:40 AM
-14

OK. Result, no relationship with his child. When he's 30, will he agree with you? Or will he maybe want to know his son?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:36 AM
-7

Maybe. I'll leave it for others to decide.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:33 AM
0

Yah, 2 sexist questions there.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:30 AM
0

Boy cows better start making some milk.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:27 AM
-10

Looks to me like the woman mopped the floor with Henry.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:21 AM
-2

I think the question of the dominance of ongoing existence of male-dominated institutions and male culture as the norm is the main sticking point. I doubt anyone would question that most third world countries are still patriarchies, like Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Male cultural dominance is now the main issue in western countries where women have made strides in legal/formal equality.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:19 AM
1

Wow, what's wrong in Australia?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:15 AM
1

Terrible. Kudos to Erin Kimmerle for exposing this.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:10 AM
2

Serious problem for men.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:08 AM
-3

Here's a little more info about the idea of patriarchy for discussion purposes: http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/11/america-is-still-a-patriarchy/265428/
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:06 AM
-21

I will of course, in taxes. And I will never have a relationship with this child, a son perhaps. it's tragic. There should be a mechanism for a boy like this victim to develop a relationship later in life, with both child support and visitation, is all I am saying.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:01 AM
-47

And the child? You didn't mention the child. Another human being, brought into the world.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:54 AM
-1

I agree completely. Stress the autonomy of women and support their making decisions. Stress women's agency. It is a thread of mens rights, you are correct.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:53 AM
4

Or maybe men won't marry and women won't need to for financial reasons any more. Marriage may be dead. Why would women marry if they're not forced into it by cultural mores, if they can handle jobs and kids on their own? Is the problem that men won't marry, or that women won't marry?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:48 AM
-80

In matters of child support can we please focus on the innocent child, as the courts do. Who will support the child? Does the father bear some responsibility for the child he has fathered?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:20 AM
-6

Avoid avfm at all costs. Circumcision is a real issue. Child custody and support are in transition and worth discussing. Please note that a lot of mens rights has to do with dismissing women's efforts to become full human beings, autonomous. Hope you'll be careful to avoid sexism.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:18 AM
-1

Could it be...satan?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:10 AM
0

Misleading title, zero content, another MRA piece of shit masquerading as a comment.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:08 AM
1

"Who(m) he had reportedly abused". Holy shit, they're starting to fight back. Somebody put the lid on!
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:27 AM
0

Not surprised. Let's talk about the perps now. Is all this shit male on male? Let's really look at this shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:26 AM
0

Maybe you should get a little more accurate. She's a lib fem.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:21 AM
0

You're quite right. Can I pretend that was a typo?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:30 PM
-1

OK, both sides decide to take a 50 year timeout while they think, negotiate, and adopt new paradigms. If not, it's the men who will crack, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:46 AM
1

Oh come on. What BS.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:06 AM
0

Are we assuming Elam will come off as a crazed misogynist or something? If he can't make a case here, should he be purporting to speak for MRAs?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:01 AM
1

And what? Too many people already, deaths in childbirth, men stuck with kids they never wanted, unwanted children...what a mess. Why not separate for awhile and let things settle down, then adopt a new way of relating that isn't inequitable to either sex?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:59 PM
1

Why would anyone crack? seems like a good idea. Main thing is, each sex leave the other sex the fuck alone.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:52 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:50 PM
0

Best thing that could happen is to add women to the registration requirement.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:17 PM
1

Oh fuck yeah, keep this program going.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:16 PM
0

Why is everone assuming this will be a hit piece? If there is merit to MRA positions, why assume they will be attacked in mainstream media?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:11 PM
0

I wish Miley Cyrus would go away. She is a young little toad.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:06 PM
0

Good thread. We have to keep in mind the unpopular idea that boys are inherently more active and aggressive than girls.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:58 PM
0

I really hate to say this but the message is ambiguous and the effect will be nil.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:56 PM
0

Usually this test is done in the context of a court proceeding and your bro would have a date to talk it over with a mediator.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:54 PM
0

Nah, the radfems attacked him from the start.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:53 PM
0

Go for it - as long as no exercise of privilege or power is the result, men need such spaces. Women need them too - I wouldn't mind going to a women's club - soft chairs, good food...
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:50 PM
0

O fuck, they're misguided and seriously young, let's move on.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:48 PM
0

Celibacy is cool.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:44 PM
0

Because they never wanted to get married in the first place? Is it a masculine gender role that's not working any more?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:43 PM
0

Whoa, are you saying men will murder their wives because of laws intended to enforce equality? How sickening is that?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:41 PM
0

Fuck marriage. It's a bad idea for everyone.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:39 PM
0

You won't get anywhere with this post here.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:33 PM
0

Yes, a slowing of the birth rate would be helpful I think.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:31 PM
1

So, stop getting married? I realize this may seem revolutionary in India, but now feminism is making marriage into something it never was. Now women will have very considerable rights to the marital estate. So...why get married?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:46 PM
-1

Is this a problem for men?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:54 PM
2

Well now, what are the stats, 4.9% of the women and .9% of the men, so 5 times as many women...let's be real here. And who's doing the assaults where violence/threat of violence are involved...men...this is a real problem. And 96% of the offenders against women military were men... Come on, the problem is men not women as assaulters. The miliatry can put a stop to this and seems to be making progress. It's a social issue and I bet all offenses, both male and female, will go down drastically now.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:51 PM
0

Agree with this analysis, gieger. Sad that the story went nowhere. It's like she did the setup, then couldn't follow through. The ferocity of the description is interesting, that's the best I can say.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:47 PM
2

Totally confused. Is the ex-husband a man who became a woman or something? Seems irrelevant, but I can't get the story without clarification. Also seems like a better story for /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:42 PM
3

When will this be aired? Anybody know?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:32 PM
8

She doesn't ID herself as radfem, stop calling everybody radfem who says anything you don't like. Beyond that, Cyrus is going to regret the ways she's humiliating herself for publicity some day.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:27 PM
0

Yeah, sex assault. It forcibly sexually degraded him. Yeah, big lawsuit against the constable. Guys like him should never have been hired.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:12 AM
1

"military men in anonymous surveys report being victimized by women 60+% of the time(this stat includes men victimized by men and women.)" Sorry, I'm confused. Do the anon surveys show men saying they were victimized more than 60% of the time by women? In what way does this stat include men vicitmized by men as well as women then? Maybe you could give a source, that would help. Thanks.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:08 AM
0

I'd have to go back and take some time, and I have provided some information, so how about if False Throwaway drops in again and tells us why this wasn't in the newspaper, and that he can't give us any confirmation because reason, and that he picked that name with no history for some other reason than that he's a false throwaway. Meantime, it's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:15 AM
1

That's a bad sign for the book.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:44 PM
-1

Here's the previous one. I've seen half a dozen.http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1k9l1p/thank_you_for_stalking_me/
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:15 PM
5

The "So" Dude returns with a new tale of evul women. Just continuing to point out, none of these weekly little stories seem to be true. If it's true, I'm sure So Dude can link us to a news report - a rape arrest is going to be reported. Otherwise - he's just trying to rile everybody up with fantasies.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:44 PM
-1

Great question. Since men control that technology, it is women who will become disposable, IMHO. or if they manage not to get disposed of, they will start their own society and the separation of the sexes will be complete. With sex for reporduction out of the picture, the question will be how much the sexes really do desire each other.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:30 PM
5

The idea that there is a trust account and child support goes specifically into that account for the specific purpose of supporting the child is excellent. In case of conflict and a court proceeding, both parents can see generally where the money went. It should not be used for support of an ex-spouse - that what spousal support is for.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:53 PM
7

i nominate this for Most Misleading Title of 2013.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:41 PM
-1

I'm saying that I question the veracity of this post, as it looks like very similar vignettes that show up about every week here, with different details, but the same "So" beginning, same writing style, and same tale of evil women. Just one opinion.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:39 PM
-10

"So" Dude is back with his weekly fairy tale about the evul women. Meh. He hasn't put much literary effort into this one, and he hasn't seeded a few comments anywhere else to give him any semblance of credibility, he's getting lazy with this throwaway.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:51 PM
-1

No, because as he himself admits, he's not a male feminist and never was. He was a fraud, in it for attention and self-aggrandizement. So this is the brain of a mentally ill person who happened to latch onto this particular social justice movement.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:35 AM
0

I dunno, maybe you should attack the US Supreme Court - I was just providing the relevant legal framework, as that was what your question asked. Now I see you're just looking for confirmation of your preexisting opinion. You won't get that from me.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:18 PM
0

I seem to recall some protests. I don't think it's fundamentally different if you think about the denial of rights. But there may be differences based on funding, access to media, and greater level of silencing of Tibetans. We could also petition Russia to stop harassing its Uighurs, to close down some of its old Gulag cities in the North where people are too stuck to leave, to disarm its nukes...Overall, I think Russia will pay attention to the PR problems this petition will cause. There won't …
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:51 AM
1

The legal framework for the distinction between legal abortion based on the mother's constitutional rights, and homicides of fetuses by third parties, is shown in all its complexity in this legal brief in Hawaii: http://www.hawaii.edu/phlo/phlpj/v1/htm_files/v1-04-Barber.htm I don't really think it can be fully discussed here, but maybe you could study the brief.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:56 AM
1

Sorry if you're right, but I saw a longer version of this where the guy who got pushed was a crazed fundamentalist preacher talking about the sins of homosexuality to an angry group of male and female students. Are you sure?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:11 AM
2

Interesting question. One could argue that the feticide laws do apply equally to men and women, as this quote from wikipedia's article says: "According to the organization National Advocates for Pregnant Women, South Carolina, one of the first states to pass a feticide law, has charged only one man who assaulted a pregnant woman under this law, while approximately 300 women have been arrested. Widely publicized cases include that of Bei Bei Shuai, charged in 2011 by Indiana authorities with murd…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:47 PM
1

In what way is she a feminist? Why not just say she was a student, or a woman?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:27 PM
0

I've been looking for such a language. No luck yet. Is it possible there is no such language? Can anyone give an example of a language in which the male is not the default?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 01:36 AM
0

Based on the info given in the article, I agree, it is a disgusting display of misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:51 AM
-2

This is good. I hadn't ever heard the phrase "eye-fucking me like a piece of meat". This will come in handy. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:51 PM
0

I'm sure they will, now that they have the funding.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:47 PM
1

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews Wouldn't it be better to check stuff like this before posting?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter