~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 675 | Tik Tok feminist tells men not to approach strange women in parking lots. | Social Issues | awesomeness6698 | /r/MensRights | 05/04/23 07:05 AM |
| 227 | You should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child. | Legal Rights | awesomeness6698 | /r/MensRights | 11/09/23 04:42 AM |
| 43 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with? | Legal Rights | awesomeness6698 | /r/MensRights | 05/11/23 10:32 PM |
| 24 | How do I make a good argument against alimony? | Marriage/Children | awesomeness6698 | /r/MensRights | 26/01/24 07:57 PM |
| 4 | Is being put in an awkward situation worse than having no way to support yourself? How do I make an anti-alimony argument? | Marriage/Children | awesomeness6698 | /r/MensRights | 13/02/24 08:05 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This is good news, sort of.> Considering child support payments don't leave dinner plate sizes wounds or are a leading cause of death in men aged 18-35, men are kind of getting the better deal. It is merely your opinion that pregnancy is worse than child support. There exist people who disagree with you. It is likely that at least some of the men who are forced to pay child support (maybe even a lot of them) live in poverty. Under the system that currently exists, if the mother gives the child up for adoption and the fath… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/26 12:56 AM |
| 1 | This is good news, sort of.> Women deal with a heavy toll for reproductive health, the silver lining is that they get a post choice. Men have it easy in that regard, but only get a prechoice. If the father wants the mother to abort, she can give birth against his wishes. If both biological parents want to give the child up for adoption, that is allowed. If the mother wants to keep the child existence a secret from the father, no one will force her to inform the father of the child's existence. Therefore, if one biological… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/26 12:44 AM |
| 3 | Either both spouses should abandon their duties after divorce or neither should.OP suggested that maybe the legal duty of the higher earner (bread winner) should remain as it currently is, but the lower earner must be court ordered to fill the homemaker role. Honestly, that does NOT sound like a bad idea. However, I am not entirely sure how this would work. Do you have any ideas? | /r/MensRights | 11/12/25 11:06 PM |
| 1 | With regard to alimony, How do I respond to the concern about the lower earner being unfairly screwed?Alimony was created in a time when women had very limited job options, and so alimony was just about the only way for a divorced woman to make ends meet. That is not the world in which we live today. Today, women account for almost half of the workforce ( https://www.bls.gov/blog/2017/12-stats-about-working-women.htm#:\~:text=Women%20are%20Integral%20to%20Today's,three%2Dquarters%20of%20the%20workforce. ). If you are unable to work, then you can and probably should receive disability benefits. I… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/24 11:40 PM |
| 21 | How do I respond when someone says that alimony should be paid, even if the lower earner is at fault for the failure of the marriage?It is completely relevant who ruined the marriage. If you get rewarded for ruining the marriage by being given alimony with no expectation to serve your spouse after the divorce, then bad behaviour will be rewarded. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/24 11:38 PM |
| 2 | Alimony should be abolishedIf your wife is the breadwinner but she is abusive, there needs to be a way you can safely leave her without going into poverty. As OP pointed out, there already exist legal precedents that allow you to sue someone for battery. If you are divorcing someone for domestic violence, seek refuge in an abuse shelter (if you live close to one) and file a lawsuit for aggravated assault. This monetary compensation for physical abuse does not need to take place in the form of alimony. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/24 12:10 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Angryasfk. I am confused. Are you actually advocating for an abortion ban? Or are you simply calling abortion a necessary evil? | /r/MensRights | 13/11/23 05:29 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Abortion of any kind isn’t “good”. That is where you and I disagree. https://youtu.be/h83Hi-4hbvc?si=YoLgGTapjs8VWN8X https://youtu.be/GxM9BZeRrUI?si=SkWcm5BG2_qGz-lk https://youtu.be/sQcewdr4bd0?si=wI9yemLSqwpf0Y4F https://youtu.be/g9YWLaCkPKM?si=izSfEVV9QKSZLecc | /r/MensRights | 13/11/23 01:39 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Paper abortion should be linked to abortion laws: if no abortion allowed, no paper abortion It is funny you should bring that up. Even if a woman lives in a state where abortion has been banned, she can still travel out of state to obtain an abortion. Ned Lemont is enacting policies to make it easier for women, who live in red states, to travel to Connecticut to obtain abortions. https://www.axios.com/2022/04/30/connecticut-bill-safe-haven-abortion-providers-roe https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-t… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/23 10:31 PM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?bigelow6698. This is a good one, I will use that. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/23 02:19 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Here is why I brought up this topic. I recently got involved in a debate about this topic in the comments section of a YouTube video. I made clear that the policy for which I advocate would work as follows; Once the child is born, the mother can sign her name on the birth certificate if she wants to raise the child. The father can take the issue to court and demand custody of the child if that is what he wants. If the mother wants the father to be in the child’s life, there is no need to take th… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/23 01:51 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Here is why I brought up this topic. I recently got involved in a debate about this topic in the comments section of a YouTube video. I made clear that the policy for which I advocate would work as follows; Once the child is born, the mother can sign her name on the birth certificate if she wants to raise the child. The father can take the issue to court and demand custody of the child if that is what he wants. If the mother wants the father to be in the child’s life, there is no need to take th… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/23 01:49 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Here is why I brought up this topic. I recently got involved in a debate about this topic in the comments section of a YouTube video. I made clear that the policy for which I advocate would work as follows; Once the child is born, the mother can sign her name on the birth certificate if she wants to raise the child. The father can take the issue to court and demand custody of the child if that is what he wants. If the mother wants the father to be in the child’s life, there is no need to take th… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/23 01:46 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Here is why I brought up this topic. I recently got involved in a debate about this topic in the comments section of a YouTube video. I made clear that the policy for which I advocate would work as follows; Once the child is born, the mother can sign her name on the birth certificate if she wants to raise the child. The father can take the issue to court and demand custody of the child if that is what he wants. If the mother wants the father to be in the child’s life, there is no need to take th… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/23 01:44 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Here is why I brought up this topic. I recently got involved in a debate about this topic in the comments section of a YouTube video. I made clear that the policy for which I advocate would work as follows; Once the child is born, the mother can sign her name on the birth certificate if she wants to raise the child. The father can take the issue to court and demand custody of the child if that is what he wants. If the mother wants the father to be in the child’s life, there is no need to take th… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/23 01:42 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Milk and Honey. You agree that the man should not be forced to pay child support if the woman raped him. Should he be exempted from paying child support only if she raped him? If he consented to sex, did he consent to parenthood? If you say that a man should only be allowed to opt out of parenthood under the narrow condition that the pregnancy resulted from the woman raping the man, that poses two issues. Issue #1: How exactly would this work? Does a man have to prove that he was raped before he… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 05:56 PM |
| 0 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?universal basic income is not a replacement for a loving father. There exist fathers who pay child support only because they have to and they resent their children because of it. I cannot think of a way that that is different from having the child be supported by tax dollars. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 05:30 PM |
| 2 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?parents may legally place their child for up for adoption Are you referring to the circumstance where parents of a four year old divorce? Are you saying that, when the parents of a four year old divorce, they should be able to give their four year old up for adoption if they want to? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:37 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?> But it WAS eddy’s decision. It was Eddy's decision to have sex. The decision to remain pregnant was made unilaterally by Brenda. > When you have sex with your partner you assume the risk of becoming a parent because pregnancy What about rape? Imagine a man rapes and impregnates a woman. Imagine a statistically less frequent but still equally as reprehensible hypothetical where a woman rapes a man and gets herself pregnant. If the woman, who ends up pregnant from rape, wants to give her child u… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:28 AM |
| 2 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?He took responsibility. You can’t just abandon it once taken. Are you referring to the first scenario, the second scenario or both? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:24 AM |
| 2 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Lasttoflinch. Suppose that both parents decide together that they want to throw the four year old into the foster care system. Should that be allowed? Why or why not? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:20 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?hendrixski Do you believe that Eddy in scenario 1 should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to his child? If so, why is it different if John walks out on his child in scenario 2? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:17 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?I for one believe that both men and women should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an already born child ( https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOpinions/comments/17d9ezv/you_should_be_able_to_opt_out_of_financial/ ). In many states, abortions have been banned. The women who live in these states should be afforded the right to opt out of financial responsibility to an already born child. Do you agree with that? If so, why is it different if a parent walks out on their four year old a… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:16 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?There exist US states where abortion has been banned. Because of how many women would be forced to remain pregnant, I feel that these women should at least be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an already born child. Men should too. To hear more about this topic, click this link ( https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOpinions/comments/17d9ezv/you_should_be_able_to_opt_out_of_financial/ ). | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:13 AM |
| 1 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?because as soon as that condom breaks, everything that happens to you is in her hands That is exactly what I am complaining about. The decision about whether the pregnancy ends in birth or not is made unilaterally by the woman. The man may have wanted the woman to abort and she may have given birth anyway just to spite him. That does not matter, the man and the woman share equal financial responsibility, even though they did not have the same say in whether or not the pregnancy ended in birth. A… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:11 AM |
| 0 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?he's abandoning a child that will forever wonder why his dad didn't want him I would argue that Universal Basic Income could also help the child’s basic needs be met ( https://youtu.be/kl39KHS07Xc?si=KwkFzskM39zLeO7A ). If you are not in favor of that, there are certain welfare benefits that could be given to the custodial parent to help support the child. Technically, taxpayers supporting children is already a thing that happens. If a child ends up in the foster care system because both parents… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:06 AM |
| 3 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Because a fetus doesn't have any sentience. The point you seem to be making here is that opting out of financial responsibility to an already born child is different from terminating a pregnancy. What if the father wanted the mother to abort and she gave birth anyway just to spite him. The man cannot force the woman to have an abortion procedure if she does not want to. You cannot have it both ways. You cannot say that the decision to have an abortion or not falls on the woman and the man gets n… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 04:04 AM |
| 2 | If you walk out on your child, is that different from opting out of parenthood to begin with?Lasttoflinch. I absolutely agree with you. Now suppose that a child is four years old and had both his mother and his father (and the mother and father have been married to one another) for the child's entire life. Now imagine the mother and father want to get a divorce. Should the father be able to abandon his financial responsibilities to the child? That is what I am not sure how I feel about. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/23 03:59 AM |
| 1 | How do I refute the argument that the child has a right to financial support from all of his/her parents?Here is what OP should say in order to win the debate. Point #1:In order for the child to receive financial support from the father, the mother would not necessarily need to be the one to enforce the obligation. Suppose the woman who lives next door to you has a baby. She chooses not to seek financial support from her baby daddy. Let’s say that you believe that she should be seeking financial support from her baby daddy. Imagine if a legal precedent existed that allowed you to take the father to… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/23 03:55 AM |
| 1 | Is the 80/20 rule real?elitelocalpro. What I think you are implying is that Slate would be biased? Maybe, but is there any empirical data to contradict my source from Slate? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/23 04:16 PM |
| 2 | Is the 80/20 rule real?Vinny said that most women would not respect a man who makes less than them. Men fare better when mentally and physically when care taking responsibilities are shared in a relationship ( https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/797597 ). Couples with a female bread winner report more happiness ( https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/08/study-shows-husbands-whose-wives-out-earn-them-are-happier.html ). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/23 02:36 AM |
| 2 | You should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child.If you where alive in 1915 and you predicted that (within five years) an amendment would be added to the United States constitution granting women to right to vote, at least a few people, maybe even a high number of people, would think that you are overly optimistic. Despite that fact, that prediction would be correct, it was in 1920 that the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote ( https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-19/#:~:text=The%20right%20of%20citizens%20of,this… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/23 07:22 PM |
| 2 | You should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child.No sane politician is going to change the system as it bolsters states coffers and get them women's votes. Actually, there exist women who support a man's right to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child. https://youtu.be/JRdq2zqGxgY?si=7YqWTXUJsjyjpra0 https://youtu.be/UFYxlmRRnkw?si=pBnPCCmnK1I2WCTC https://youtu.be/Z3UmXu97yRQ?si=-2hBQKLW74u93vPN https://youtu.be/50UCPLmNdnM?si=QiBF0MyKEAf2iGAk | /r/MensRights | 11/09/23 06:48 PM |
| 3 | You should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child.You did the deed, you must pay the consequences Three things. Imagine if you ate a raw hamburger, got a tape worm as a result and you were prohibited from taking medication, because you should not be eating raw meat if you do not want a tape worm. If you believe that people who have sex without the desire to reproduce are irresponsible, why would you want them to be parents? What about rape? Imagine a man rapes and impregnates a woman. Imagine a statistically less frequent but still equally as r… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/23 06:41 PM |
| 3 | The old tote that "you are only being creepy if the other person isn't attracted to you" is only partially true.Creepy is creepy regardless of how attractive a guy is. I wouldn't exactly say that. It is possible for something to be romantic if a person to whom you are attracted does it but creepy if someone to whom you are not attracted does it. Imagine if someone called you sexy. That is something that a lot of people would find flattering coming from someone you are attracted to but creepy coming from someone you are not attracted to. This one article says that wearing dirty clothes or having messed up … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/03/23 10:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter