TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

awwwwyehmutherfurk Archive

View 2 posts and 210 comments by awwwwyehmutherfurk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And yet soldiers don’t mow down every civilian they see after being told that. Infact, soldiers regularly storm the houses of innocent civilians without killing anybody despite receiving info that those in the house are dangerous. Soldiers won’t shoot when they see there’s no weapon. They don’t shoot just because there might be a vest. When they set up checkpoints, they don’t shoot every car just because there might be a bomb. You’ll do poor to compare police and anything military or war time re…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:04 AM
1

No, I just choose to be much harsher to people who act idiotic when it comes to sex between adults and minors. If it was history, science, entertainment I'd be much nicer.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 09:27 AM
1

That's idiotic. You don't even know the point. It's about the fact it's done to a 14 year old by an adult. It's about the imbalance. Two drunk people fucking is fine. One blackout drunk person and someone stone cold sober however is considered creepy and inappropriate. Same thing. You sound like someone who thinks they understand logical reasoning and tries to smugly apply it at every level. Unfortunately, you're actually dumb as shit. Your logic isn't sound. Your point isn't sound. Your correla…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:53 AM
5

Just to be clear, you can't see the difference between two kids having sex together, and an adult and child having sex together?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:47 AM
2

Anna is weirdly obsessed with rape. I remember trying to find this video recently (I remembered seeing it when it was a little fresh) and I couldn't because she has like a dozen videos of her own about rape
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:46 PM
6

Hell he was more than a known YouTube personality, he wrote a pretty fair number of well known (albeit unsuccessful) films.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:35 PM
1

I see it a little bit in Brisbane but only from people renting out single rooms. It's a little bit annoying when you're missing out on decent deals. But fuck them, if that's the attitude I don't want to give those kinds of people my money anyway.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:45 AM
2

Not good for every country though. You get caught carrying a handgun around in mine and you're in some massive shit.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:12 AM
21

Yes, nurses make less money than engineers.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:24 AM
3

If all you need to do is put up enough of a fight than you don't need those classes. Those sort of classes teach ineffectual techniques, to much "do this and do this if he does this" without much fight from the instructor, partner. You can choose to learn something to protect you from someone determined, or not. Your choice.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:16 AM
24

Learn an actual self defence or good quality martial art and follow it through and train regularly. For starters these rape self defence or women's self defence classes rarely have proper sparring to practice. If you're not getting punched in the head (gloves of course) you have no way of preparing yourself from actual strikes or grapples. So I recommend stuff like Judo, BJJ or Krav
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:04 AM
22

Rape Self Defence is almost universally shit anyway. Kicking a dude in the nuts isn't as effective at stopping a much stronger and larger man than they think it is. Especially if he wants to get you.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:43 AM
1

It's appropriate, nice good people with a fan fucking tastic arms industry.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 07:29 AM
2

I actually think female feminists are better at empathising or working with MRA than a male feminist is. There are female feminists who are sympathetic to issues men face even if they have a negative view of MR. On the other hand, I've seen that the majority of male feminists come from very privileged backgrounds (wealthy, upperclass, sheltered etc) and have never experienced any of these problems (or even the violence that a lot of lower and middle lower class blokes have to deal with) and so t…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:29 AM
3

I guess the NOW has a really poor opinion of women if this what they consider courageous
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:13 AM
8

How to be a bad person 101.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 09:17 AM
14

Her boyfriend is a creep. Run it by him? "Oh hey bro your girlfriend, also known as my longtime friend, has said spen thing I disagree with. Mind if I disagree with her openly? May I have your permission?" Fucking. Creep. Go take that to R/feminism and I bet they'd agree too.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:27 AM
1

I'm not even American and I know more about the SS then them. Has all those consequences of not signing onto SS been removed? Because if I recall, there's a lot of Government benefits and rights you lose if you don't sign onto SS that women automatically could get due to them not having to sign. So maybe you shouldn't use the wage gap as some excuse. Or are there now no consequences of refusing? I would like that much more.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:08 PM
28

Or if we're going to go on the murder logic, murder the father?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:38 PM
4

I've noticed the mens bathrooms are the only places I see health advertisements like this. The closest similiar thing I've seen outside of a bathroom were a few posters talking about how men can be abused as well, but that was on the inside of a PCYC
/r/MensRights10/04/16 12:22 PM
7

My reaction: "Found guilty of rape" Oh shit! Fuck that... "By UC Burkley" Oh.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:10 AM
6

I thought AS was ArmoredSkeptik, given the running joke on YouTube and Twitter about them being close.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:09 PM
1

Are you drunk?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 07:50 AM
1

Wasn't once, pretty sure he continued to do it regularly even after she blocked him and broke contact. Still a dumb thing to bring to court.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:31 PM
2

I'm a UQ student aswell. Surprised, haven't seen this particular thing before. This kind of attitude gets fairly routinely ridiculed on the Uni's student facebook group, so UQ isn't going to be going too crazy any time yet.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:44 PM
3

Gotta start somewhere guys. Think of this like the Redneck meme.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:45 PM
11

Brah you should have just held her down brah. You're a man brah what was she gonna do brah?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:15 PM
3

I didn't even think of that, maybe because I can't see how that reactions warrants it. This would be the worst thing to do.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:10 PM
49

Yup, he put her through hell so badly that she had the power to restrict his movements. Yup, he must have so much control to put her through hell eh.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:11 AM
13

This is bullshit, if she has the power and ability to just sieze his fucking FB and keep him from contacting anyone, there sure as shit something fucked up going on, and he sure as hell couldn't have possibly had the power to "put her through hell". Those trash saying that its right are fucked up. Literally the only, ONLY thing I can think of, that can in anyway legitimise these actions was if he had some hardcore acident that made him super, duper mentally retarded and she has to do EVERYTHING …
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:10 AM
0

For it to be a debate their has to be an issue with people resenting facts and evidence. There was no debate, you just said women are inferior, and used "look around you" as evidence. There's nothing substantial about what you claim, it's just dumb and wrong. Can't be a debate. So go be a dumb ass someplace else.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:31 PM
1

I don't blame them, many military personnel don't trust the hierarchy, there's been unequal standards for so long many believe the leadership will cave to political pressure
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:24 AM
1

I believe they think that the army plans to just lower standards so women can pass, and they don't want them to do that because it means women will be going into war under trained.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:12 PM
1

The over all point that you were making is still pretty moot. The blitz, The occupation of the Chinese capital, occupation of Germany by the Soviets, pretty much every famous "sacking of" in history. Civilians have ha to deal with a lot of war. Now, civilians in modern times don't know shit. Big difference.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:22 PM
1

You didn't read the article. It's a lawsuit to gain freedom of information. Not a discrimination case or anything like that.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:54 PM
2

This is fucking clickbait, the article says they're doing the lawsuit because they're concerned that the DoD is planning on just lowering training standards so women can get in, this would both degrade effectiveness but also disadvantage the women by forcing them into combat without proper training. I get the impression that the people filing the lawsuit would rather it stay all male rather than lower standards. It's also clickbaity because the lawsuit is just for freedom of information. The way…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:54 PM
1

To be fair now, I wouldn't say we shielded them. What, do you think there's never been any occupation or civilian casualties since the beginning of warfare?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:44 PM
4

And yet it's not standard practice in this sub to call people kids when you disagree with what they're saying and things don't go your way. Sounds very typical of childish behaviour itself, so I'd suggest you get over yourself and contribute in a meaningful way. If you don't want to be meaningful and just want to talk shit, piss off somewhere else.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:51 PM
5

That's rich, calling someone else a kid. You're a joke mate.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:30 PM
2

Interesting, in Australia university is the institution for your tertiary education and the college is usually the set of dormitories. All classes generally happen on the one campus, if they don't its referred to as a different campus, not college. Interesting isn't it?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:07 PM
2

Fuck I hope you don't have a child, far too many assholes running around already.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:02 AM
1

No problem. What an asshole.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:01 AM
29

After you hit puberty you are able to ejaculate sperm, thus as long as he had slept with a girl at the age of 18 who also had reached puberty, he could get her pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:49 PM
3

This is some advanced stupid.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:31 AM
1

My favourite comment about this was from SexyisntSexist on Twitter, where she wondered how Jessica Valenti will spin this into something belittling to women.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 03:13 AM
4

Really? Personally I've found the African guys the coolest. I remember fondly, this one guy from Eritrea. Man he was so cool, we chatted the whole taxi ride (which I usually hate), told me a lot about life in Africa. When we got to my destination we just shot the shit for like another twenty minutes. Should have gotten his number. Doesn't matter now though, not even in the same city anymore.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:46 PM
7

This course serves zero purpose. What do they think they need a girls only class for? Too much of a boys club? Afraid of bullying? A friend of mine is the only girl in her programming course at uni and says that most of the guys just live up to the stereotype and don't even talk to her. Not because of bullying, they're just too scared.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:38 PM
2

The irony, refreshingly clear yet so oft misquoted. I'll see what my local bookstore has today.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:17 PM
2

I really love Harris, I admire his ability to keep calm and clearly and rationally talk, even in the face of people yelling. He's the complete polar opposite of Cenk. Cenk is a showman, Sam is an academic. I actually only got onto Twitter for Sam, his spot on Maher really impressed me and I want to pick up one of his books.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:07 PM
2

Yup. Looking forward to Sam Harris joining the show. It'll be interesting, now that CJ Werelman has been outed as a pretty severe plagiarist. Be interesting to see how Cenk reacts to Sam beig able to defend himself against the crap CJ spouted when he was last on the show.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:54 PM
1

The kid was 18? That's not peadophilia, dudes an adult. It's still unethical, as she's his teacher, but it's fine. Under 16? Then we have a problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:49 PM
2

I used to like TYT but they have really started to piss me off these past few months. Funnily enough, it's mostly Cenk that pisses me off and Ana seems to often be the voice of reason. Once upon a time, it was the other way around.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:43 PM
1

Wait, this guy is house-bound? Why would anyone listen to someone criticise society when they themselves are not even part of it?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:05 PM
1

While I found it Mildly funny, it's also complete bulshit. I know I'm not the only man that has all those thoughts run through my head when ever I become even remotely involved with a pretty girl.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:57 PM
1

I disagree with both premises. The boys at not stage will ever think that. What it will teach, is that if you rock up to school with the wrong uniform on that they'll make you fucking change. The boys and girls might think it's fair or dumb, depending on the reasons why.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:54 PM
21

Jesus, who the fuck just does that to someone you're supposed to love?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:33 PM
1

Mate is also a common phrase in the United Kingdom, not just Australia.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:03 PM
31

Deadbeat
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:41 PM
0

Miss Mazzola, if you are going to argue law with Harvard law professors, youre gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:36 AM
8

The YouTube comments on those. Those videos really do piss people off.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 12:57 PM
59

How can it be legal for a Judge to deny a defendant the ability to defend himself? Isn't due process written into your constitution? What can be done to combat judges who are clearly acting in blatantly unethical means?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:42 AM
4

I'm not sure if I can take it seriously with the picture of Dolan right there.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:13 AM
36

The sad thing is I was also expecting something about being innapropriate with children.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:21 AM
1

They're still not nearly the same thing. PTSD is a mental disorder, it can't just be fixed. Keeb was using it in reference to a debilitating disorder, its the same reason if someone was mentally unstable we don't send them to maximum security correctional facilities, we send them to mental health institutions. Which is why he said it should be a factor in "sentencing" You say that you're not saying PTSD is just stress, but you litterally, actually are. Unless you just felt like saying stress sho…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:17 AM
7

Yeah I'm pretty sure it's always been like this.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:43 AM
1

PTSD isn't "Having a bad day". PTSD isn't just "stress". Theres a reason its a "disorder" you ignorant shit. For the love of god, do you have any idea what this condition does to people?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:35 AM
1

Dude chill. That's creepy as.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:44 AM
4

And she's been queen since most of these peoples PARENTS were kids.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:42 AM
1

Thought so, I find that if you do too much it won't work. In the future, try maybe a sentence.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:19 PM
2

Hah no worries. I had actually thought you might have meant the Danish researches quote. Odd I suppose, but were you too specific on google?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:19 AM
2

The article. edit: sorry, you meant the paper?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:45 AM
2

Oh maaaaan. Now that just sounds fantastic.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:09 AM
7

It's a real shame. I'd love to be able to go to an old school baber for a traditional straight razor shave, which these guys apparently do. I have this weird fantasy of just beig able to sit down while this old bald guy shaves my face.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:21 PM
40

Looking at their twitter page, it seems this has racked up a fair bit of extra business for them. Thanks feminists!
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:09 PM
1

I don't think this is a very fair title of the video, some I the men had the same reaction and some of the women did not react as such. I also think most of the laughter came from the sensitive nature of the topic. That being said, what I find interesting is the reactions mod people had at te follow up question. The slight pause as people kind of went "uhhh". The way I see it, you should never hit someone you dot expect to hit you back, if that happens to be someone bigger and stronger, then tha…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:31 PM
2

This is the weirdest fucking attempt at advertising I've ever seen. What was going on in the advertising agency? It's just so...weird. As soon as I watched it I thought "this is off, it doesn't look real".
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:16 PM
2

If like to know where and when, livin in Brisbane id like I go see it.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:11 PM
2

Then she pulls a fire alarm and files a rape report after her friends convince her that that's what it was.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:28 PM
5

Dude you sound like a retard.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:13 PM
1

I can watch it right now, but there's a lot of these, does this guy say anything new?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:19 AM
2

If there's any feminists reading, this is why people accuse feminism as being like a dogmatic religion. You can't do anything wrong, and when you do something you say is unacceptable, you give yourself an exemption for no other reason then it's because you did it.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:23 PM
1

She's like a less energetic, monotone Dane Cook.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:25 PM
1

Damn right
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:29 AM
3

I hate the image of a man with his leg spread on the seat. It gets used often. Look, feminists, please, theres two things you have to understand are fact in this world: Physics and Human Biology. As a man, when I sit, due to the way in which my body is designed, my testicles will ALWAYS be placed inbetween my legs. The only way they are not, is if I actively reach into my pants and readjust my testicles. We both know that you'd find that unacceptable, so I cant do it. Instead, I place my legs wi…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:27 AM
3

...yeah that is a real odd time to be having arguments like this. Your friend dominated that shit though.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:04 PM
5

Man I wish stuff this exciting happened on my news feed.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:50 PM
1

Unnnnnnngh but why?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:34 AM
1

Well, 52 a year is 1 a week. Thats what I meant when I said "On the other hand, thats only"
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:41 PM
3

I'm going to want a source for that "one woman a week" because I call bullshit. If this is "Brisbane, Australia" then I doubt it so, so much. Our homicide rates are extraordinarily low, especially compared to the US. The ABS (Australian Beauru of Statistics) places homicide in Australia as 1.1:100000 whereas the FBI places the US's as something like 4.4:100000. Keep in mind most homicide victims are of course men. On the othe hand, that's only 52 a year. Not bad for a country with a pop of 25mil…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:34 PM
1

Reality vs Fantasy bro. I'm sure your girlfriend would be happy of a drunk hobo dragged her screaming into his alley and raped her.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:40 AM
0

I saw that on their front page a few days ago too. Right at the top, tons of upvotes, Women Want to be Raped. Right bro, right. They want to be raped.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:07 AM
13

Few things make more angry then the concept of refusing to hear evidence.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:59 PM
2

What do you think is going to happen to people in those six months? "A blanket security measure"? Are you absolutely fucking insane? You want to put people in the streets because they can't get a job? Do you have any idea how bad that is? Do you have any idea how much of a scumbag you are? Some people are bad so everyone else must suffer? Some people game the system so those who don't get fucked in the arse because you're upset that you make too much money to ever be impacted by the system? You …
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 12:01 PM
1

Wow son. You literally have no idea. I'm going to assume you've never needed the system based on your ignorance, but correct me of you have. So here is how the new budget wants to set it - you loose your job. You don't get "the dole". At all. No help. For six months. Nothing. After six months, then you are allowed to get support. Pretty fucked if you live in an area with high unemployment. Now, the dole is below the poverty line, when I was on it, I was given $420 a fortnight. I was lucky I had …
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 10:21 AM
1

I was only quoting one of the papers.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:43 AM
3

That "super power" is his attempts to dismantle Australia's very good and successful welfare and social policies. That "super power" is his attempts to change the medical and education systems closer to those of America, something that the overwhelming majority of Australians don't want. There are other smaller things, like using the anniversary of D-Day as an opportunity to announce how he's going to be talking to foreign leaders to inform them that "Australia is open for business". It doesn't …
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:19 PM
3

It barely got press though. I didn't find much online and the NZ article is the only one that seems to put more focus on the "ban men" part.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:10 PM
7

This was also posten on mens rights, so I'll leave you guys with the response I left over there, as i feel it has some better information: Is a New Zealand newspaper the best that could be found on an issue happening in an Australian state? Although, its slightly uplifting that the tone of the article seems to imply that the Premier kind of had a "Are you serious?" reaction to the proposal of banning man. It seems that the suggestion came from the commission, and so might not be entirely fair to…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 03:24 PM
4

Is a New Zealand newspaper the best that could be found on an issue happening in an Australian state? Although, its slightly uplifting that the tone of the article seems to imply that the Premier kind of had a "Are you serious?" reaction to the proposal of banning man. It seems that the suggestion came from the commission, and so might not be entirely fair to say that the SA government is considering banning men. STILL: Its ultra fucked up and pretty infuriating that someone on the commission ha…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:41 PM
2

Not really dude, the whole "He doesn't like sports because of some inane bullshit" shtick really does apply to likes and dislikes. But thanks for the compliment.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:26 AM
2

Makes sense to me, you don't have the intellectual complexity to understand the concept of likes and desires, I didn't expect you to have the intellectual complexity to stand by your own shit.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:17 AM
1

Insulting? Damn, you are as fucking retarded as your post made you seem. I don't like to get personal on reddit because it's dumb but Ohwell, if you're going to act like a cunt, I might as well treat you like one. But hey, on the bright side, you don't seem as big an asshole as the guy on reddit who called me a killer jus because I was in the army. Swedes eh? Now, I'm not sure if you know this, but 16 years is not "too long" to have been on this earth. I can only assume you're a fucking kid, bec…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:25 AM
3

Yeah, "unwillingness", most people are unwilling to continue to do recreational activities they find boring. That's....not laziness
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:36 PM
5

Because of he had sent you picks of a dick, you'd have found that e was just an attention who're looking for praise and adulation wen though he merits none. If he wasn't a attention whore he'd ignore you and continue on with whatever non-gendered discussion you may or may not be having.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:21 PM
8

Lazy? He literally tried a bunch of things to find out what he liked. What would you prefer? "Man you've been playing rugby for 3 years you must really like it" "Nah, I actually fucking hate it. I find it incredibly dull and boring. I only do it because if I do something that I find more mentally stimulating and enjoyable, people will accuse me of being lazy" Taking the time and effort to play a bunch of different sports requires time and work. Getting bored is not lazy.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:17 PM
1

Not being from the US, I was really unaware that circumcision was done to lower risk of STIs. It's done in Australia but I know the Australasian board of Physicians discourages it (as do other Australian Medical authorities) because it's rather pointless. People still do it here but as far as I know their reasons are usually "just cuz". I guess I missed the point of the article then because I have very little perspective on why people do it. I usually trust the trained medical professionals.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:13 AM
1

The whole issue is rediculous. STIs are a fact of life an a risk you run when you have sex. No one should be mutilated just because someone else might get sick. I don't know why there are even articles. This is retarded.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:58 AM
3

Ex army, can confirm, we make incredibly un PC and tasteless jokes. It's pretty fun, I think the world would be a better place if everyone did it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:12 PM
10

No my friend. The next step is we censor REAL LIFE.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:45 PM
9

Jesus, the stuff on the Vulva page is the most rediculous. "Offensive"? Moronic. It's a god damn vulva, if you're over 18 you're old enough and mature enough not to freak out at pictures of fucking genitals.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:04 PM
-13

This doesn't tell us a damn thing. For all we know these ten men might actually been making obscene phone calls.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:40 PM
3

There is however, a sense of responsibility on the members of the movement though. If people are damaging the image of the group, then everyone needs to come out regularly enough to fight against that idea. While some do, it really isn't all that common amongst feminists. I don't see many feminist publications or sites decrying chanty binx or similar such individuals. We have had a few female actors come out and say they're not feminists and then we see articles and blogs decrying those women ju…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:29 PM
12

I think the key here is the use of the word "vindictive", to me atleast the use of that means he is clearly not referring souly to the everyday woman who also claims to be a feminist (remember feminism isn't just "fighting for equal treatment", that's a gross over simplification), but the ones who talk about systematic oppression of women in the west (often talking smack about men in the process) which looks really god damn petty and self centred when you then look at women in countries such as,…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:05 PM
1

Pick up just about anything by Andrea Dworkin, she was a famous feminist and published a lot.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:07 AM
2

All men do not cheat.... But I think I can understand why this one did.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:31 AM
6

So a rich black man can still not be racist to a homeless white guy, even though the black guy has all the power.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:31 PM
1

That was a fantastic read.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:20 PM
3

Andrea Dworkin is considered a feminist. I promise you she did not believe these things.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:49 AM
1

There are people in this thread calling the woman a bitch! That kinda proves my point. She attacked you. Dude, she is a bitch. If a guy was hitting one of my female friends, I'd call that guy a bitch too. Probably a few other choice words. I'd probably hit him as well. Ignorance is not an attack on character either.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:04 PM
2

I can assume you don't know. You called us a "mens-supremacist" movement. I take it back, you ARE a liar. That isn't true, its not part of what MR advocated, its not even a part of A Voice for Men. At no stage, have I ever, ever witnessed a successful thread that espoused men being superior to women. Comments that say the same either get ignored or downvoted to oblivion. The paragraph of people who have suffered worse than me actually does feel a little like you're minimizing my suffering, even …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:01 PM
1

I called you a liar because you said things about us that were not true. In retrospect, it could also indicate ignorance, so I do apologise. My comments about dignity and honour are in no way connected to what happened to you. Seriously, don't just respond in this thread its old. You'll mostly just get the people who you replied to to respond (since they will get a notification). You will only be able to reach a minority of Mens rights. Seriously, we have 90 000 subs, most of which won't know yo…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:27 PM
2

No man, its not about not helping people who don't align with our ideologies, its not like you went to people who just think differently, you went to people who are actually against, quite specifically, US. Its not like you went to r/feminism and said "Help, a woman attacked me" you went to a groups that actually attack and quite specifically act against us, when there you said we were terrible. What do you want? If you talk crap about people and hang out with people who also talk crap about the…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:23 PM
1

Also, I would make a recommendation. Screenshot all the negative messages you received, then post them as a new topic here. Make us accountable for what has happened, directly instead of whining about us with people who already don't like us and see what happens. We don't ban really ban people here and it would give you an opportunity to see what the rest of us think about how you are being treated.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:51 AM
1

Man that statement flies in the face of everythign MR actually fight for, its actually a statement that WE encounter a hell of a lot and have to fight against. Theres a huge possibility he was being a sarcastic asshole.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:29 AM
3

The issue we took with what you said isn't "Hah, he is a feminist" but the fact you made a flat out lie. r/mensrights would not would say things I don't want to hear about women. Man, if you had come to us we would have just told you what we tell the many, many, many posts we get from victims of domestic abuse. We would have told you to find a lawyer, find a safe place to stay, we would have empathised and sympathised with you, told you we were sorry that it had to happen. We wouldn't have said …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:27 AM
9

This is a man I'm not sure we can help anymore. He has cast away his own dignity.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:40 AM
1

Remind me of that old story, "The Racist Tree".
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:22 AM
2

I very much like this post.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:03 AM
13

I like that this one had a happy ending.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:37 AM
1

I agree fully. It always astounds me where people get these ideas from because it's not here.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:00 PM
2

Interesting way to put it - I don't worry about what masculinity is for me, I already know what it is. I just want make sure other men can have the opportunity to develop and understand it their own without someone screaming "It means being a rapist" in their face. The wall of text isn't the main point, just my own answer to the question, the first question. The first little paragraphs is the topic. Figured it would be better of me to just chuck my opinion/response in the topic head then as a di…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:28 PM
2

Oh great. I just can't wait for this to hit my news feed. Then again I was lucky enough to not see anything about Eliot Roger.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:14 AM
1

We all did my friend, we all did.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:37 AM
2

Feminism isn't "women", being against feminism doesn't mean you are against women, which is what they're pointing out here. Feminism is a political and ideological belief. It would be like saying that if you do not believe or consider yourself a communist, then you must obviously be against equality.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:23 PM
2

I hope Karen does write a book.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:13 PM
2

Tony Abott isn't labelled as mysognist or creep for winking, he already ha this reputation, they're just calling him what he has been called before. Abott is a scumbag though and shits over the lower classes. You might have seen some uproar on r/worldnews about him lately due to the unpopular budget he has brought out. Check out some of the Australia subreddits, or the ones for the capitals and you'll see him cropping up a lot. Abott has been accused of mysogyny before, so it's a lot easier for …
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:07 PM
2

Most of these I agree with, except naturally, the "teach your boys not to rape" esque signs for reasons we all usually agree with. Other than those, these all make sense to me. The blurred lines one not so much because as soon as you introduce alcohol to ANY situations, lines begin to blurr. We've all seen these before and I don't think anyone here excuses rape or would disbelieve most of these. It's true that what you wear doesn't excuse the actions of a rapist, but sadly we can't control rapis…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:58 PM
2

In that case, a short summary of what happened with the little girl?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:16 AM
6

Check the rest of th comments, another user posted a link to a video where Paul Elam recounts an experience he had talking to a group of mental health professionals. This comic is based on that. So this, for the most part, did happen.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 11:48 PM
1

Wait what happened?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:51 PM
2

Prison rape and prison culture is a hell of a fucking beast and is something that you would THINK isn't difficult to fix. From what I have read is a lot of the problems coming down to the security staff either not giving a fuck or thinking "they're in prison and deserve is" and crap like that. I'd like for us to invest time in tackling this issue.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:11 PM
21

Yeah he makes the big mistake that a lot of these people make when he says the right doesn't think feminism should be serious etc etc. He fails to recognise that when people say stuff like that, they're generally talking about the western society they grew up in. For example, I don't really think feminism is that needed anymore in modern western society, women have all the rights men have, its up to them to persue their own goals now. Yemen on the otherhand, is where feminists REALLY should focu…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:10 AM
1

Ah, seems it stemmed more from the Second World War rather than the first, due to poor field hygene. It makes sense, it's super easy to keep your dick clean and not have any issues in the least, but considering the conditions of a lot of these dudes, probably no the best. http://www.circinfo.net/what_caused_many_cultures_to_remove_it.html That being said, from what I also found the majority of german troops and the Afrika Corps were not circumcised.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:30 AM
1

Ripping toenails off has never been a thing, however, and infections of the toe nail would have been less common. Feet still got pretty fucked up though. Your comparisons to toenails is pretty poor, considering it would also hold up that they would then flail their skin forgetting dirty. We're not talking "getting dirty" but receiving infections. I would also never refer to the American civil war as the Great War, because that makes no sense. I will try and find the reference that I read that im…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:14 AM
1

If you take out the subservience to patriarchy theory most of them have, I'd find them mostly agreeable too.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:10 PM
8

I don't see anything about MRAs, we need a source man.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:19 PM
1

That's kind of my point. OP has this painted as being about sexual assault. If this was left unsaid I would have assumed this is about not letting a friend get into the car of a drunk driver or some such. If it's about sexual assault it isn't worded right.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:04 PM
1

It's easy to be banned there. I used to be subbed as well and kept up with some of the articles and posts. Didn't post much. Got banned because someone had said that "this proves tht we undervalue teachers" in reference to a graph showing how much more money doctors and engineers make compared to people in fields such as teaching etc and I responded saying that we don't undervalue them, doctors simply get paid more because it takes more time to train them and their training is more difficult, th…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:23 PM
1

Holy shit all you can eat crab legs for an hour? Man I've only had crab once but it was so damn good. This is annoying though, I hate the dads are dumb mentality. I want to be a father one day, kin of pisses me off.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:19 PM
1

From memory, I believe the Great War had some impact on it aswell. A lot of soldiers had infections during the war and had to be circumcised as a result. This left the impression that the circumcision would help make it easier to clean. Never really making the connection that it's not in the slightest difficult to clean when you are uncircumcised but it is pretty hard to keep your dick clean when you spend 4 years dick deep in rat infested mud water trenches.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:16 PM
5

This is really, really confusingly worded. By the sounds of things, a guy was drunk so some girl was going to offer him a ride, but he seemed off or suspicious so some other girls organised someone else to drive home? But do they do it because they thought the girl was drunk (thus the suspicion) or because they though she might take advantage of him? It's so unclear.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:05 PM
9

That hat is rad.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:01 PM
1

I know, but I also chose to leave. Sometimes I regret it, sometimes I'm glad of it. Doesn't matter though, I'm young and have a whole life to make regrets heh. I'm about to begin study to become a teacher now days, so atleast in one small way I can do my part to stamp out the "Be a man" mentality. Honestly, I've lived my life with the idea of treating everyone equally, man or woman. Treat people like people, be a person. Thats the idea.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:44 AM
3

You can tell that man that, words from someone who has ACTUALLY been in the army "If you think not wanting to go to war makes you less of a man, then not only are you an idiot, but you're an insult to all the men who have died in war". You ask any, any veteran of any war if they think war should happen, if men should have to go and die, they'll likely tell you no. There isn't a single soldier on the planet that is mentally healthy that thinks war is good. Some, like myself, believe that in some …
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:18 AM
3

While I don't think the military is exactly what you're cracking it up to be, being in the Army doesn't mean you're going to have do any form of combat - but then again, when you volunteer you ACTUALLY have some control over that, instead of being forced into things like with the Draft. You can go into medical or construction rolls where you help an extraordinary amount of people at a level you might never see in a safe western country - however, as soon as that uniform goes on you are also a le…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:13 AM
4

Ah yes, conscription. Always been opposed to this, old people here in Australia often say that they should bring back national service and as someone who was in the Army and often contemplates returning to it I am fully against it. I don't consider it ethical or justifiable in the least. It says on that pamphlet that not registering may loose your entitlements to a large degree of social services - that pisses me off most of all. If a citizen looses access to those, then he shouldn't have to eve…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:07 AM
1

We don't but I have a feeling it's going to start happening. They hav been bringing in systems designed to specifically help women. You should have seen everyone loose their shit when we opened up the Airdorce newspaper one day to see a new scheme that is designed to specifically streamline and help females qualifying and passing their initial pilot course. I don't really think it'll get to an official quota system but things are being Putin place to give women significantly more support and eas…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:06 PM
1

Yeah I'm expecting to see quotas. At the moment though we aren't seeing many women reach these quotas generally for two reasons. They can't pass the fitness standards, and it seems that women just don't seem to want to be in combat roles. Sure some do, but it's a much lower percentage.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:02 PM
8

Gorrillas and members of the great ape families actually have, on average, smaller penises than humans. Cool huh.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:57 AM
1

Sorry to hear that, I don't know if it makes it any better but my country isn't lying. It was already phased in as I was discharging an I did some of the physical training sessions (basically doing each part of the test without actually being time or as one big set) myself. This was last year, they were trying to get a female officer qualled to go into infantry (the new fitness test is divided into combat corps and non-combat corps) but she hasn't been able to pass the combat corps standard. I d…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:42 AM
3

Make a male only group then. I hate this attitude though about "Female Gamers". The reason these individuals get negative responses is because they identify as "female gamers" rather than just "gamers". You don't have to pretend to be male in gaming forums or games because people have no idea what gender you are until you mention it or speak over microphone. Not that that is an excuse, but the kind of turds who actually make those dumbshit sexist comments are generally the same turds who claim t…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:47 AM
4

As ex military, that's a real good way to get people killed. Fortunately my own country Australia, now letting women enter combat roles has begun reforming te physical standards, not makin them worse, but instead focusing the fitness tests around the actual requirements of the job, rather than a rather arbitrary number of push-ups/sit-ups/run times.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:18 AM
3

These examples are about 40 years old now - do we still think this is the case? I know I'm talking about myself here and a sample size of one is not really reliable but throughout my time in school and the army no one was ever forced to feel or not feel modesty. I mean, the double standard described in the article I've never actually seen, it has always been a general consensus for privacy.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:06 AM
1

I don't know how to paragraph on reddit. I usually browse on mobile and only very occasionally type large amounts.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:00 AM
2

Tell me about it. I was looking at this source: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BN/2011-2012/DVAustralia It also stated that injuries due to domestic violence were the leading cause of death for women but the study they linked to this information, from VicHealth, couldnt be found: http://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/NotFound.aspx Great. I love statistics to pieces, I love how they can explain things, its like a pet thing. Naturally, I hate …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:08 AM
3

I was aware of that, and suspected that they did so to fluff up the statement and make it seem worse (since death is of course worse then injury). They can use that phrase as a defence, I don't mind because it means I can point out what I just said, that they're trying to manipulate statistics.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:18 AM
5

The stat is not only wrong, it is so far wrong its not even funny. Domestic violence is not only NOT the leading cause of death in women under 45, it isn't even in the top 10 causes of death. In fact, murder as a cause of death in Australia is extraordinarily low (atleast compared to the US), it isn't even in the top 20 causes of registered deaths for all Australians. Australia has a murder rate of 1.1 per 100 000, to put that in perspective, that is around three hundred people for an entire yea…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:01 AM
2

I thought it was referring to the bin and was like "ew, that's awful", made OPs title confusing. Had to read the comments becaus I have never seen, let alone heard of one of these before.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:40 AM
2

Damn, as a white male this hotline sounds really good, I've been having a lot of trouble lately getting a job, maybe having a white guy on my resume will help me get an interview! Oh wait it doesn't work like that! Gods she seems like she'd be unpleasant company.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:35 PM
-1

Came here to say this, you beat me soley by the time it was taking me to read the article. I know OP may be speaking sarcastically with that, but I agree, be the bigger people. As for the article, the whole power dynamic really falls apart when you realise that the male penis is treated with the same, sometime stronger, censorship rules as the nipples. Society has this weird issue with nudity. I think of it every time I watch a holywood film and as soon as they finish having sex the woman is wea…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:14 AM
10

I have enough hair on my chest that since I have been 13 I have been nicknamed chewbacca. I was in the army and my only current skills really is my ability to operate assault rifles, light machine guns, claymore explosives and the knowledge and know how on how to effectively set up an armed ambush for maximum killing potential. You are literally preaching to the wrong guy about masculinity because I'm a big fat stereotype of that. The thing is this not a sub exclusively about straight men, it is…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:29 PM
2

Damn the man show was awesome when kümmel and carolla a were in charge. Then those two other douchebags came in and not only was it predictable, stereotypical and unfunny, but plainly smutty. Christ, even I would have called it sexist.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:10 PM
21

This subreddit is about men being allowed to be who they are without society or laws trying to prevent that. There is a subreddit that you might fit in well with though, and it's called The Red Pill.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:31 PM
1

This is an awful stance to have. It becomes child pornography if it becomes POSSIBLE that someone who is bad might maybe see it? Really? Peadophilia is something that is so far into the minority that trying to classify any family photo with a naked child as child pornography is utterly ludicrous. The "danger" is so little that I can't even laugh at your conservatism. This line of thinking is exactly what caused what I mentioned before, my government trying to senser pornography with flat chested…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:44 PM
1

For it to be pornography it's got to be sexualised. Picture of you and friends at a nudist beach? Not pornography. Naked woman fingering herself? Pornography. As for children, photo taken my family member while laughing at the beach/running around the house / situation like in the article? Not pornography, at all. It is neither sexualised nor produced for the intent of being sexualised. If the father/mother was making the children be naked to take photos with the intent of distributing them for …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:27 PM
1

You have fun with that, it's with thinking like that that my country tried to ban all pornography containing women with flat chests because it's too similar to a child's body and could be used as such. But since you think there is no objective difference, you let every parent everywhere know they have all shot child porn. Sorry mate, nudity =/= pornography.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:06 AM
1

Are you saying the pictures parents have of their children naked is child porn?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:49 PM
1

The only danger those who downloaded the images can pose to the children is of they actively seek out the child, but really that's a different matter.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:07 AM
1

What? Almost every parent of my friends has nude photos and videos of their kids in their bath. It's perfectly normal. Why would you be disgusted? If you have body issues this is a safe place for to talk about that. Why rage?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:25 AM
0

That sort of stuff is best used in tutorials. Tutorials are were the students discuss lectures and readings. The lectures are for lecturing (unless the lecturer asks for imput). Always makes sense to me, gives you a hance to call out the bullshit in an appropriate place.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:06 PM
1

What the hell is this even about? Are we meant to be happy? This seems so out of place. And why did OP delete his or her account?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:03 PM
7

Because the point is it highlights her own prejudice. Dismissing it because you were too lazy to take the extra minute to read the rest of the article is just weak on your part. Seriously, the article is pretty short, takes maybe two minutes to read if you're a quick reader.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:53 AM
1

Was gonna say the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:24 AM
4

Because she then admits that she is wrong. This article is a perfect example of why you always read to the end
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:45 AM
6

Hey man, Southpark. Remeber the Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwhich debacle?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:16 PM
6

I think calling someone something based on something they cannot control is unfair and immature, instead we should use things that better describe why we dislike the person. Using a gendered insult is inappropriate, because the fact she is a woman has no bearing on why we dislike her, we don't hate women. We dislike her on her attitude, insults like psuedo-intellectual, philistine, sophist etc are the sort of insults we want. Or just jerk. Anyone can be a jerk.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:05 PM
31

Ladies and Gentleman, I think it would be best for our image if we stop referring to the women who act in loud and shrill ways as cunts. I know that in my culture cunt is /generally/ non gendered, and something that men call each other alot, but if we really want to convey that the MRA is indeed a group that wants to help the issues men face (Divorce, suicide, homelessness, custody laws) then perhaps we should talk more with reason and calmness, and not resort to calling those who oppose with us…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:39 PM
3

This guy was the worst thing about my favourite show, whiny, annoying, couldn't act for shit, was made into a god in the show (and in real life if you look at his fanbase) for some reason. I literally could not care any less about his opinion. He could actually be agreeing with me about something, and I still would not care.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:34 PM
20

I was unable to finish reading, this man made no arguments or points, it wasn't even eloquently written. All it was was him insulting this guy in just disgusting ways. What a piece of trash. I can't stand people like that, keyboard warriors. I would never talk like that to another individual online or real life. I have a point that I do not treat people online worse then I would in real life, I will not use my anonymity to allow me to treat humans like dirt while attempting to sound intellectual…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:56 AM
33

Hillary?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:03 AM
3

Yeah it's not, I agree. No 13 year old has maturity, not a single damn one. They may think they do, but they don't. There is no exception, 13 year olds are the worst kind of teenager.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:14 AM
2

Oh I'm not saying what he did is okay, he's a pig, but I don't think it's fair to call him a peadophile when he isn't really.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:18 PM
4

I wouldn't call it peadophilia but instead statutory rape. For it to be reasonably considered peadophilia he would have to actively seek out girls who are child like, pre-teens in age and appearance. Sure he knew she was 13 but if she looked a good many years older then he isn't getting the sexual thrill or fulfilling the desir of sex with a pre-pubescent. Not pedophilia. He is still a fucking moron though who has zero control over his body and has the decision making skills of an autistic rabbi…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 06:54 PM
1

The problem is man, I or something to be human, it must posses te certai. Traits that have allowed us to become what we are. 1 Reasoning. 2 Logic an 3 Cooperation. You see where my dilemma is.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:28 PM
1

I know I know. That's why everyday I loose my belief that feminists are actually people.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:20 PM
2

This is why people need to start looking at each other as people, and not divided by gender (or race). I don't think feminism will allow that to happen though
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:05 PM
1

That filled me with such rage. It's the early hours of the mornjng man I can't sleep when my blood is boiling and only justice will sate it. God damn I need to go see r/justiceporn
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:39 PM
3

Actually, seeing the logo for the store "spar" doesn't surprise me. We have Spar in Australia and had one in my small town. They only let females on the deli aswell, and only guys were alowed in back doing packing and stuff like that. They just didn't advertise it like this.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 06:26 AM
24

My government is always putting up posters and ads saying "one punch can kill." I agree. If you are attacking me, you are trying to kill me. Tht is how I see it, and will defend myself accordingly.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:41 AM
10

This guy is an idiot. "Restrain her" if she has a fucking gun it might go off while I attempt to "restrain" in which the result may be I, or anyone else she was pointing at. Instead it would be easier to simply punch her in the skull and knock her out immediately. I won't endanger my life or someone else's just because Matt Walsh has beliefs that are backed up by nothing. An that whole "men who hit women are doing it because they are bullies, they need to teach them a lesson" drivel. Really? Is …
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:54 PM
3

What do we think? I personally found it rediculous, especially concerning that there are huge amounts of porn not made for men and a huge amount of porn actually made by women. It seems like a self righteous attempt to make men seem like brutes, or creatures who only think about sex. So very self righteous, one of the couple of Ted speeches that actually made me annoyed.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:07 PM
1

The mobile must have linked me to a different article because what I was reading had neither those and a lame pun at te start and otherwise treated this like a normal news story.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 04:20 PM
-28

That article is fine? I didn't even notice the pun until you guys pointed it out.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:54 AM
1

Honestly, false drug charges would work better because it's consequences might be worth running from - you are likely aware that people get fucking stupid long sentences for minor drug offences. Loitering will get you a fine if anything.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:40 AM
2

Because claiming that killing a cop and running is easier then fighting a loitering charge is such an insane escalation it's not eve funny. You are comparing the murder of a cop to the crime of standing where you are not supposed to.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:35 AM
1

The meaning of hyperbole or how rediculous the comparison you made is?
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:40 AM
1

Except that's not true in the slightest and one if te biggest hyperboles I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:08 PM
1

Okay I agree. But women in turn are not slowed to benefit from anything that is maintained or built by tax. So she can't use the roads. She can't get medical support or wealthfare. If she's ever getting raped, the police are not Allowd to help her. If she is robbed, police can't help or investigate. If her house is on fire she will have to put it out herself. If she's injured she can't get an ambulance. In fact she can't use any hospital that was built by the government. If her country is ever i…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:56 PM
3

Pretty intriguing viewpoint. I'm probably gonna start noting this when I watch the news now - which is what makes the video successful.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:23 PM
2

What do you mean? They were just quoting from the study, didn't sound like they were actively promoting men as being expendable.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter