ayyylatimestwo Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
7	Is there moving forward from this point? 7 year relationship (26F) (28M) Exactly, does this guy even like women? The fuck am I reading	/r/MarriedRedPill	18/06/23 09:10 PM
2	Do you think the red pill could actually help lonely men get laid and get in a relationship? Alright, pretend I didn't use the word psychology, replace it with "reasoning".	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/05/23 06:55 PM
10	Do you think the red pill could actually help lonely men get laid and get in a relationship? will leave you for an alpha the second she gets an opportunity, will leave you if you show weakness. The red pill doesn't say these things will happen with 100% certainty, it says it's part of a woman's nature. Men are taught that women are these wonderful creatures who can do no wrong, have pure intentions, who always do the right thing, when in fact they can be as shallow, selfish, and straight up evil as men can. The red pill dispels this notion, and teaches you all the bad shit that women of…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/05/23 11:35 AM
1	How do redpillers explain the engagement of jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez? The red pill doesn't explain everything, it's not a law of physics.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/23 12:57 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman Agree, I think if your "phase" is short lived then it may be fine, but probably still going to distort your view of things permanently. This is all very theoretical and hypothetical. But agree that modern dating is actually cancer for society, moving things in the wrong way. Maybe with time we will see it evolve. It's gonna take a long ass time though.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 08:37 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman As you said, high n count almost automatically makes you assume there are some red flags. I don't see how can there be good reasons for it. But no matter the reasons behind it, lets say there aren't even ones you'd consider a dealbreaker. The reason why I think it's a verifiable fact that high n count women have more unsuccessful long term relationships, is that they simply can't consider the 50th guy they're with, that special. You've been with 49 guys, I am the 50th, the likelihood that there …	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 08:19 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman I would say n count matters more than any physical attribute, since it's literally been proven to affect relationships. If some physical attribute matches my minimum requirements, I would always pick lower n count over improving that physical attribute, if that makes sense.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 08:01 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman then the woman would prefer the wealthier one. Well, no shit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 07:51 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman woman knows she can use her low n to go out and grab a richer, taller man, then how does her low n make her a better option? That is not how that works. A woman who has a low n count, has it in an organic way. She has it because she may be more commited to her partner, less prone to single encounters, more dedicated to maintaining a relationship and truly valuing it. Women don't keep a low n count for the sake of it, they do it naturally. Which means that she will naturally be a better partner. …	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 07:50 PM
–	For any man with abundance/options, there is no benefit to choosing a promiscuous woman why shouldn’t she pick the man who is 2 inches taller, or makes 5k more? But she does :D Oh man women reversing the roles on this sub is the absolute most entertaining thing, I love it	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 07:47 PM
1	No one ever seems to want to acknowledge that women consistently go for abusive, bad natured men. If you bring this up all they do is shame you to silence the discussion, and this is probably the most prominent example of gaslighting in dating/gender dynamics. His approval rating was abysmal throughout his entire presidency. Hahaha, and Biden is better? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-07/biden-trails-trump-as-his-approval-rating-hits-low-in-abc-poll' Come on, I already understand you're an "orange man bad" reddit NPC, but at least realize when you're saying simply untrue things. Millions upon millions of people still worship the guy, which goes to support the original point of this argument. People love assholes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 09:13 AM
2	No one ever seems to want to acknowledge that women consistently go for abusive, bad natured men. If you bring this up all they do is shame you to silence the discussion, and this is probably the most prominent example of gaslighting in dating/gender dynamics. The covid point is pure cope, and I know you aren't gonna post any data or polling to be back that claim up. There is no data to back that up, just like you don't have any data to say it wasn't his covid decisions. If it was such an epic failure of a presidency he would have lost by a bigger margin and wouldn't be considered for a 2024 run, he wouldn't have a base anymore. Don't try to rewrite history just because you hate the guy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 08:45 AM
9	No one ever seems to want to acknowledge that women consistently go for abusive, bad natured men. If you bring this up all they do is shame you to silence the discussion, and this is probably the most prominent example of gaslighting in dating/gender dynamics. Still got 74 million votes, lots of people love the guy still. If it wasn't for covid he likely would have won, so it's a great example actually.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/23 08:08 AM
5	CMV: Most men are totally okay with waiting to have sex, but they're scared of being friendzoned so they feel pressured to make moves on dates What special treatment do you expect in the first couple dates? You're just getting to know eachother. Would you expect the man to show up with flowers and take you to a 5 star restaurant?	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/05/23 04:22 PM
13	CMV: Most men are totally okay with waiting to have sex, but they're scared of being friendzoned so they feel pressured to make moves on dates Sorry, but it's so funny that every time I see women try to "reverse the roles", they just get it so, so wrong. Which means something in itself. A man doesn't withhold anything like a prize that you need to earn, like women do with sex. Reversing the roles here is pointless.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/05/23 04:07 PM
13	Just pay attention to her I think you failed a shit test	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/05/23 08:56 PM
3	Defining Love. Basically, don't stand still for a fucking moment, or I'll leave you and take the kids, no matter how many years we've been together.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/05/23 10:26 AM
4	Pleasing a man sexually as a woman is so much easier than pleasing a woman sexually as a man you have a very specific preference for sex, so you are high maintenance and not as easy-to-please as you think. Nah, my ex was a complete starfish and I absolutely loved the sex, she did other little things. But what this girl did with the movement specifically, took things to another level. But it's not a must have at all. And I'll say it again, if you're gonna not starfish, you gotta do it properly, or the man may just ask you to stand still cause you're just making it worse, not better. I th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/05/23 03:48 PM
1	Pleasing a man sexually as a woman is so much easier than pleasing a woman sexually as a man they complained I was moving. Not kidding. Well, you gotta move the right way, otherwise you may as well not move. Last girl I was with somehow rocked in the perfect counter motion during missionary which would make me go much deeper inside her, made me go crazy and her as well.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/05/23 03:29 PM
2	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore Not impossible, just unlikely.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 11:47 PM
2	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore Maybe, if I find that one in a billion person. Very unlikely.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 11:43 PM
2	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore I don't really care how you put people in boxes, the TRP has nothing to do with your ideas of tribalism, Cons do this, trads do that, PUA says this, jesus, I don't care about any of these "groups" of people, if TRP didn't exist they would grab hold of some other similar concept, these people don't define TRP. Just because someone says they believe in X, it doesn't automatically mean you can put them in a box. Sometimes you can though, but not always.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 08:21 PM
5	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore How is marriage reaching a peak exactly? It's the last "official" thing you can do as a couple, the last thing you can flaunt to others to show you're serious, the other thing is having a child I guess. Being the wife has a different status than being the girlfriend, women absolutely love that shit, and for good reason, if I was a woman I'd love it too. The average woman actually gets fucked over the most in a divorce. Citation needed? Agree to disagree on this one. What do you expect to do when…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 08:17 PM
5	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore Marriage automatically lends itself to a mentality of, "we've reached the peak, there is no need to try anymore". No I don't believe in it, but there are plenty of people who are happy, just like they would be perfectly happy unmarried. In modern days, it's a pointless social construct to fuck men over, and protect women, nothing more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 04:52 PM
6	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore rights to their bodies, finances, and make decisions for themselves. RP doesn't tell you that you have a right to have a sex with woman, it teaches you the psychology behind it, so that the woman will want to fuck you all the time, of her own free will. In fact, it tells you that if a woman does not want to have sex with you, move on to the next one. Finances? Not sure what you're talking about. make decisions for themselves Don't think it says you can't make decisions for herself, just that the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 03:15 PM
8	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore It is what the red pill is But, it's really not. Removal of human rights has nothing to do with TRP. Nobody is asking for women to lose their rights to vote, for example. pro-patriarchy, traditionalism, conservativism None of this means you lose human rights, I'm conservative and I am pro life for example, but in a conservative way, which means you shouldn't have 6 months to decide whether you want an abortion. I think you're confusing things and trying to make TRP into some extremist politic vi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 01:48 PM
8	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore advocating for removal of their human rights? That's not what TRP is? And I don't think TRP is sexist either, it's just realistic. For me it's all about self improvement, forcing you to own your shit, work on yourself, recognize your value, and search partners of equal worth and not overly depending on other people, including your partners. TRP is not Andrew Tate. Andrew Tate is a fucking psycho.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 12:53 PM
12	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore If a woman couldn't attract men Why are we talking about things that are not possible, you may as well be talking about time-travel	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 12:43 PM
6	The Red Pill will become mainstream because the gender divide has become impossible to ignore everyone else goes on dating And being unhappy when they get married and their wife stops having sex with them	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/23 12:41 PM
1	As a man, your perceived ability to get casual sex will define the tone of every long term relationship you have Well, what matters is not how awesome you are, what matters is how awesome you think your man is, and how many women want to fuck him other than you. If you think not many other women would want to fuck your man, you're likely to treat him differently than if you thought otherwise.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/23 02:59 PM
17	As a man, your perceived ability to get casual sex will define the tone of every long term relationship you have A woman always has options, she will always have orbiters, it's never a concern for her whether she ends up alone. So reversing the situation doesn't really apply. Women ALWAYS have multiple suitors going after her, even if you're obese, lol.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/23 02:12 PM
3	Men, how long is waiting for sex too long? I don’t believe there’s a guy out of my league No? Not even Brad Pitt? Do you consider yourself a 10/10 or?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/23 02:09 PM
4	Men, how long is waiting for sex too long? And are you sure you'd do that if you had a chance with a guy out of your league? You would still make him wait, knowing if you don't have sex with him and try to lock him down, someone else will?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/23 02:03 PM
20	As a man, your perceived ability to get casual sex will define the tone of every long term relationship you have So if a man cannot be a player a woman is no longer attracted to him, is essentially what the OP saying. No, how can you get it so wrong? If a woman knows her partner has other options, she will behave differently than she would with a man that she knows has no other options. A man who confessed he was single for years for example, the woman is a lot more likely to behave differently in many situations, because she knows he won't leave, he doesn't have any other options after all. Also a good re…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/23 01:51 PM
6	realising that the pool of suitable men for marriage is dwindling rapidly in your 30s it's the female equivalent of the shock that the redpill causes in men The wall only exists in the minds of young people Also people with a pair of eyes	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/23 08:30 PM
2	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? It would be, if he said something to the tune of, "you fucked all these guys in the past but you won't even do anal for me". He's not trying to get anything out of it, he's just simply showing contempt and throwing it in her face, he's not expecting to gain anything from it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:48 AM
3	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? So you do accept that can be a thing that breaks compatibility, that's what I was getting at. Obviously it's something you can hide, so maybe you do and you know it's not something to be proud of. If you went and told your partner right now you've been with 100 guys in the past, he'd likely not be very happy with that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:47 AM
7	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? If I was going to decide to marry you, I absolutely would care about your past, no matter how good the sex was. But that's me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:37 AM
1	CMV: “Insecurity” and “Trust” are words increasingly being used to gaslight men It's like every story I read makes me want to get married less and less. Jesus christ people suck.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:35 AM
3	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? That's not really blackmail, more like just throwing shit in her face. I get what you're trying to say, but you should look up the definition of blackmail.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:25 AM
2	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? The benefits is that you are by definition, much less likely to be special to her. If you think about it, your 20th year alive feels much more impactful than your 30th does, because you've been alive for longer. Just like the 10th guy you fuck/have a relationship with, will feel much more special to you than the 100th. That's my logic anyway. And I do think it's similar for men, people who go through way too many relationships, or have too many casual encounters, are much more likely to be broke…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:22 AM
2	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? Well, you don't exactly walk around with your n count number posted on your forehead, so that doesn't say much.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:18 AM
7	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? promiscuous women have no trouble getting commitment No shit, you can easily hide it, or get commitment from any chump. It doesn't change the facts that it is NOT attractive or desirable to any man.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:12 AM
7	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? It's deppressing reading this, women in my country are known to be quite conservative (Western Europe), they get heavily judged by their peers and family if they sleep around. Foreigners who come here usually ask us what's wrong with the girls, that it's so hard to hook up. I guess that's one end of the spectrum, but clearly it's a better end of the spectrum than the one you're experiencing, which is total degeneracy it seems.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:08 AM
5	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? Any woman can be promiscuous, only high value men can be promiscuous. That's the difference here. Women who choose to not exercise that power have inherently higher value to men, it's dumb to compare men and women as equals here, or almost anywhere in the dating world, for that matter.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:04 AM
2	Where's the insentive for a woman to have low body count? Where is the blackmail?	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/23 12:01 AM
1	We hear enough about red flags on this sub, what are some of your dating green flags? Yeah, because no woman can possibly like having casual sex, it's impossible!	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/23 09:30 PM
-1	Are forever girlfriends another category of women? Marriage exists so men can get fucked over.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/23 09:22 PM
2	CMV: Men who need love the most are repulsive to women. Women who need love are extremely privileged by contrast. Well, yeah. But the more you're able to keep your expectations in check, the less it's going to hurt. I expect women to be unstable, it won't make my ability to love her or be loved any less, or to even extract happiness from relationships. But it does make it easier to cope when she finally does show unstable behaviour.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/23 12:37 PM
3	CMV: Men who need love the most are repulsive to women. Women who need love are extremely privileged by contrast. So the lesson is, never become emotionally dependent on someone. Always make sure you're ready to walk away, think about what you would do if your relationship ended tomorrow. Keep your options open, assume she can be gone at any moment.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/23 12:20 PM
1	When a girl says she loves you, what she loves is what you do for her, how you make her feel and the lifestyle she's able to participate in by being with you. Not really, I think it removes some illusions and makes things clearer. If you know the rules of the game, and understand them well, you're more likely to have success in that game, success, in my opinion, being getting happiness from relationships. Or whatever it is you want.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/23 09:55 PM
1	When a girl says she loves you, what she loves is what you do for her, how you make her feel and the lifestyle she's able to participate in by being with you. Well no, but I don't think I would stop loving my husband if he developed dementia either. Come on now, we're on the internet, you can be honest.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/23 09:50 PM