TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bIuemickey Archive

View 1 posts and 240 comments by bIuemickey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
467

Social IssuesbIuemickey/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

The worst part about it is the way things are framed once they change. Men’s only spaces in the past are now portrayed as if women were banned all together. Like higher education is one. People think women weren’t allowed to go to university when in reality they weren’t allowed to go to male universities while there were a bunch that were women-only. Things changed with the times as well. It wasn’t like there were tons of women trying to go to school and they weren’t being allowed to. They incre…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:35 AM
12

That kind of information tends to end up scrubbed from the internet and difficult to find again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 06:58 AM

You seem to think consenting to sex means you’re agreeing to a deal or transaction in exchange for sex. I’m pretty sure they’re consenting to consensual sex.. where there’s an equal, mutual engagement in the desired activity, and can be revoked at any time. Not an agreement in fulfilling unspoken hopes and dreams on the her terms in exchange for something she otherwise wouldn’t give him access to. If a man asks a woman if she wants to have sex with him, he’s asking if she wants to have sex with …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:02 AM

That’s gross and creepy on its own. Is he consenting to sex and a committed period of maintained interest afterwards? Because it sounds like false premises he didn’t consent to. Did she only have sex to lock in a relationship afterwards? That’s not what most people consent to when they’re dating. Interested in a relationship doesn’t mean guaranteed interest in a relationship with someone you don’t even know.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:17 AM
2

You have to consider how effective propaganda is and how little information was accessible just a couple decades ago. People thought it was harmful not to have it done. Doctors pressured parents into it. The medical industry is still trying to push these ideas. Back then it was like being an antivaxxer. I’m totally against circumcision but I think it’s a much stronger case against professionals. Placing the blame on parents undermines the responsibility of the medical industry and abuse of autho…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 07:01 PM
-1

Im against blaming parents. They were manipulated into believing it was the right thing to do. Guilt isn’t something you wish upon someone you love. Plus I think they’ll be more supportive and understanding if they’re treated as being on the same side as you. But other than that I think you should! I support it
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:46 PM
3

I hate my circumcision so count me in
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:37 PM
1

Good
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:36 PM
2

Who are you gonna sue?
/r/MensRights23/07/26 11:10 AM
5

I get what you’re saying but most bars are straight bars. There are no gay only bars, but gay bars exist because bars used to be “straight only”. It’s still a risk for two gay men to go out in many places without the possibility of being jumped or harassed. It used to be illegal to serve gay men in bars. You could get your liquor license taken away and be shut down. They’d used to raid places that did and arrest gay men for disturbing the peace or some bullshit charge just to publish their names…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 06:00 AM
1

What I have to say to that is: where does the study show that? But my main point is that these studies are dishonest and use dishonest methods to get the desired results. It basically says “we asked men misleading questions under false pretenses with the presumption of guilt. We stripped away context for participants, added ambiguity, structured questions in a way that could be interpreted differently with the context we’ve provided after withholding it from participants, and here are the result…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 02:47 AM
1

Rates of female-perpetrated violence are higher than male-perpetrated Among large population samples, 57.9% of IPV reported was bi-directional, 42% unidirectional; 13.8% of the unidirectional violence was male to female (MFPV), 28.3% was female to male (FMPV)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:16 AM
0

Reread that comment and pay attention to the way the information is presented. It’s comparing charges to sentencing and implying innocence as if it was proven and indisputable. If two people are charged with the same crime and face a penalty of up to 15 years, it’s inaccurate to compare time served for one person with the possibility of time sentenced to the other person. Women are less likely to go to prison at all. There’s no evidence of men serving 2 to 6 years and women serving 15 years for …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:42 PM
3

You’re using stats from a 1989 study that’s been wiped from the internet. Probably because it’s inaccurate and intentionally misleading. Just look at the way you framed the information. It’s carefully worded and structured to misinterpreted. I’m guessing that’s how it was presented wherever you found it - > Women who get charged for killing their abuser in self defense face on average 15 years in prison whereas men who abuse their partner only get 2 to 6 years. And 91% of female prisons are wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:32 PM
2

Your definition of initiating or “starting a fight” isn’t the same as what’s being measured in the research. Initiating or starting a fight in this case would be physical violence. It wouldn’t be considered initiating violence without initiating violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 09:25 PM
3

The research shows men are judged more negatively for having a messy home. It shows that people believe women will be judged more negatively than men, while judging women less negatively themselves. “John’s character was rated more negatively than Jennifer’s for having a messy home, reflecting the common stereotype that men are lazy. Yet participants did not believe John would be any more likely than Jennifer to suffer negative judgment from visitors, which suggests that the ‘men are lazy’ stere…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:43 AM
2

Romantic attraction requires physical attraction. Idk where you’re getting the “well recognized in psychology” thing, but two people having a close relationship isn’t “romantic attraction”. Sexuality isn’t something you can intellectualize into someone. No need to mansplain men’s sexuality to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:36 PM
36

Crazy how people believe women are marginalized when feminists have dominated the narrative around marginalization and inequality for at least 50 years.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:36 AM
82

You’re missing the key ingredient: people don’t value men. They simply do not care. Equality means whatever feminists decide they want to change. They build the inequality with careful framing and intentionally biased data around the goal and then serve it to the public who has empathy for one sex and indifference towards the other. I think men are willing to make sacrifices for the benefit of women without really thinking much of it or keeping score. Women’s wellbeing is prioritized. Men’s suff…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:36 AM
23

They hate the gays too let’s be real. You can’t say you “hate all men” and then say “except gay men, we love gay men” without admitting you see them as nothing more than the one-dimensional “gay” supporting role in your main character life. But this isn’t surprising at all. It’s a common thing with feminists and gay men. They’ve always done this. They used to talk trash about the gay men in early activism for not being some kind of subversive performance of a deconstructed ungendered object. The…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 03:38 AM
13

Male feminists are the worst. They have this arrogant, condescending, mansplainy mentality. Like they recite feminism as if it absolves them from the problems projected and deflected onto men as a group. It’s funny because it’s clearly not about gender inequality, it’s a way of maintaining control over how criticism can reach them. It’s weird.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 07:07 PM
7

It’s intentionally exclusionary. I agree that it might be a stretch to call it hate speech and I think a lot of people would argue that it’s not. If the genders were reversed it would easily be labeled as hate speech and weaponized against men and boys, but that’s one of the biggest issues I have with feminism and I don’t think matching their energy is a good idea. History is portrayed as if gender norms are rooted in hate towards women and that’s not the case. They claim people in this sub are …
/r/MensRights22/06/26 07:56 PM
16

“One of the reasons for this asymmetry is that men do not fear retaliation for violence against women, whereas women do fear retaliation for their use of violence against men” The opposite is true. Women don’t fear retaliation for their use of violence against men and the world doesn’t tolerate men who retaliate, even in the slightest. Men are expected to take a beat down from a woman without defending themselves. Most men don’t.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 10:17 PM
4

This director may as well do a biopic on Eliot Rodger next. Sounds right up her alley
/r/MensRights20/06/26 09:58 PM
7

She never says he asked her. Not once in the article does she say he kept asking her. It probably has something to do with the fact that the article never says she said “no” to him or anyone at any point. She said she was made to feel guilty, more careful wording, not that he made her feel guilty, or used that guilt to his advantage, the article doesn’t even connect it to the sex. It’s mentioned as guilt for their lives not going as planned. It’s her own personal internalized feeling of guilt th…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:22 AM
9

Read the article again and tell me where it says he pressured her and made her feel guilty so she would have sex with other men. It says: He “often raised the idea” but “she resisted” He “brought up swinging again” and “she gave in and agreed” “She regularly told her husband she wanted to stop” “There would sometimes be a pause” “he arranged more meetings” that she “went along with.” “Ruth told him she was quitting the site” “he kept asking her to meet other men again or to try other sexual arra…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 01:51 AM
10

I left it out because “suffering a mental health crisis” is extremely vague and it’s given one single sentence in the whole article. There’s literally no other details, no mention of seeing a psychiatrist or psychologist, development, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, no mention of what the mental health crisis “was” or how it influenced her decisions, or anything at all other than the one sentence followed by saying she felt guilty. Maybe that’s because any more detail would hurt her argument, bu…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 09:40 PM
57

She’s knows what’s up. She isn’t a feminist because feminism isn’t about equality. It’s about taking universal issues and gendering them to drop the dead weight (boys/men who are also suffering) to gain support (empathy gap) and create an enemy. Feminists will say she’s “misunderstanding what feminism is” because that’s what they do. Their rhetoric is designed with gaslighting in mind. I think a lot of older women feel the same she does because they’ve lived in reality and not the fictional past…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:10 AM
7

What’s funny to me is how there’s silence from men taking on women’s traditional gender roles. There are more stay at home dads and women in the workplace, men who cook, men who aren’t the breadwinners, and yet… they aren’t complaining about it as if it’s their wife’s work and income is a luxury privilege she keeps for herself or something lol. I mean feminism in general is like this. If you look at how quickly things changed as soon as tech and medicine advanced, women have had no issue getting…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:10 AM
2

They broadened the term to include nonconsensual anal and oral penetration of a female, and nonconsensual anal and oral penetration of a male. Before it was “the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will.” This is the definition used by the fbi, cdc, rainn, etc. Until they change their definition, most heterosexual sex acts will only be considered rape if the woman hasn’t given consent, but not if the man hasn’t. That’s how it’s reported in crime data and statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 06:58 PM
-1

> I think it a man was drunk af and had a woman perform oral sex on him without his consent while he’s near blackout drunk then yea it’s rape. And even if she forced him to penetrate then yea it’s rape These acts aren’t considered rape when the man is the one who hasn’t given consent, only when a man does them to someone else without consent. So she could perform oral sex on him of force him to penetrate her at gun point and it wouldn’t meet the definition of rape. Only if she penetrates him wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:23 AM
11

Single women had these rights lol. That’s my entire point. Single women owned property, signed contracts, leases, took out credit, opened bank account, etc. solely on their own. It was ONLY once they married that their property became a shared ownership. It was ONLY once they were married that they needed their husband’s consent to open accounts, sign contracts, and make other decisions that he’d be liable for, because they became a single legal entity. Crazy how feminists manipulate and exploit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 04:53 AM
86

“Historically, women needed to attach themselves to men. Women couldn’t inherit land, sign a lease, or travel without a male escort. Did you know women couldn’t sign up for credit cards on their own until 1974?” That’s the opening of the article. Why keep reading? Women could inherit land, sign a lease, and travel without a male escort. Women could sign up for a credit card and a bank account before 1974. At least in the U.S. These are commonly repeated in this way for the purpose of being misin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 09:53 AM
10

It’s really any male that looks like a teenager or older
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:40 PM
4

Feminists aren’t LGBT allies. They’re wrong for being misandrist and homophobic, but framing the situation in the way you have just kind of mirrors the way feminists distort and exaggerate things to attack men and make them out to be as extreme as possible. Like saying she’s a disgusting woman who groomed a boy still in high school and manipulated him into denying his homosexuality? From what I’ve read he grew up in a religious family and was in denial until recently. He dropped out of high scho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 12:23 AM
34

Always. They’ll be like “1/3 of college men would commit rape if they were held at gunpoint by their victim and forced to, study finds”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 11:30 AM
72

I saw the same thing on twitter. One said they were in middle school as a joke and they giggled. She went off on them calling them fat for taking the elevator lol. The comments were the same weird mass hysteria nonsense about how dangerous it was for her and how awful boys are. They didn’t do anything, somehow they’re misogynistic rapists who want to murder random chicks at school. I get that it can be panic inducing to get stuck in an elevator, but people act as if she should be awarded a metal…
/r/MensRights03/05/26 01:33 AM
5

The way “misogyny” is used today is incompatible with the definition imo. You can’t label societal views towards women as “genuine hatred” when women are the only group that’s actually valued at the same time.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 08:19 PM
3

It’s not even as simple as looking things up anymore. Things are hidden away, framed in ways that are intentionally misleading, or left out entirely. They’ve changed how things reported when they’re gendered. Like how rape statistics first excluded made to penetrate from the category of rape, then stopped reporting on made to penetrate numbers when it was exposed to be about equal to that of rape of women. Trafficking is a big one though. Efforts to stop trafficking and help victims primarily fo…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 01:54 AM
7

We have seen global trafficking rings exposed and men have said and done damn near nothing about it. Women were the majority of traffickers in almost a third of the 155 nations the U.N. surveyed. They accounted for more than 60 percent of the human trafficking convictions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Female offenders have a more prominent role in present-day slavery than in most other forms of crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/global-report-on-trafficking-in-persons.…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/26 07:52 PM
7

It’s more than just call you a misogynist or say you hate women, they’ll demand you let them in or they’ll sue you, and you’ll either fight against them and lose or you’ll allow them in. Then they’ll label it a feminist victory. It will end up with a Wikipedia article that’s intentionally misleading to portray a completely different tale. This is what happened to men’s spaces in the U.S. There was a bar/restaurant in New York that had 12-3pm during weekdays dedicated to men only. They were open …
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:16 PM
4

Can misogyny exist systemically if the idea of its existence has been the most effective way to mobilize men to fight against it for over 50 years (at least)? Can misogyny exist if misandry doesn’t exist? Because people only seem to care about misogyny but don’t care about misandry or believe it exists, but in the clear examples (like the empathy gap, the disposability, indifference to male suffering, suicides, deaths, and the relief when victims of tragedy are all males, etc.) there’s an undeni…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 09:29 AM
3

They do the same thing with most things. Take an issue faced by both sexes, usually problems faced by a significant but not the majority of one sex over the other, and instead of focusing on the victims as a whole, they drop what I guess they see as dead weight to make it a gendered issue to cash in on the empathy gap. It’s nuts that they gatekeep victimhood at the cost of child victims and adult men, then use the same problem against them even when many of them have never faced the problem. The…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:08 PM
24

No they didn’t. Lesbians have done this in many cases. Demand lesbian is before gay, despite basically talking shit about how much they disliked gay men throughout the entire second half of the century, complaining and having no loyalty but demanding centering them and criticizing them for not focusing on misogyny instead of laws that only criminalized homosexuality between men, police targeting men, vice squads targeting men, also the whole lesbian separatist movement, and then reminding the wo…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:08 PM
35

Intersectional feminism is just a strategic way of maintaining dominance over all forms of oppression/discrimination and how they’re defined. Feminists use “intersectionality” to make sure inequality always uses a feminist perspective and centers women. It should be used as a way of looking at inequality as unique to each person, but it is more like a way of shutting down criticism of feminist hegemony. It fails to include men in the sense that they always view being male as a positive influence…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 04:02 AM
2

Well for feminists the bar is a socially constructed tool of oppression and can be deconstructed, reconstructed, and fully customizable for equity purposes decided on a whim.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:36 PM
3

Andrew sucks. I hate debate culture. These types of conversations shouldn’t be made into a competitive sport because they just reinforce division. Andrew is no more dishonest than the feminist rhetoric though. I like his wife even though I really don’t like the things they promote. She seems more focused on revealing misinformation and intellectual dishonesty with well researched information which is something we need more of. She also doesn’t spend 99% of the time arguing to prevent the debate …
/r/MensRights02/04/26 10:44 AM
18

It’s the title of the linked article, how is it a lie?
/r/MensRights25/03/26 09:12 PM
357

Paramedics reported that Perrotta declined treatment in the ambulance. “I am fine, I just needed to get out of here,” she said, according to the report. Perrotta currently is out on administrative leave due to an unrelated matter
/r/MensRights14/03/26 12:08 AM
1

Literally googled “democrat pride flag bil” and first result: After Trump’s Crusade Against LGBTQ Community, Leader Schumer Moves To Permanently Protect Stonewall Pride Flag; Plan Would Bypass Trump Admin To Defend LGBTQ Flag At Stonewall & Across The Country Forever https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/after-trumps-crusade-against-lgbtq-community-leader-schumer-moves-to-permanently-protect-stonewall-pride-flag-plan-would-bypass-trump-admin-to-defend-lgbtq-flag-at-stonewall-a…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 04:24 PM
3

What do you mean by being right wing though? Also who’s they? Like you don’t support gay marriage? Gays in the military? Feminists have worked against both of those things and have criticized gay men for wanting equal rights since the second wave. Feminists are not allies to gay men. But I’m not even sure what right wing is tbh. Literally seems like any male with a podcast or who watches podcasts are labeled as right wing these days lol. Do you prefer a limited government and lower taxes? If you…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:35 AM
2

If you want people to read what you have to say then it post on here instead of as a link to your paid Substack.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 05:52 AM
2

Yea it has a very interesting effect… you see things you’re more likely to watch, click on, or engage with, so feminist and anti-male content leads to more feminist and anti-male content, leading to more feminist and antimale content being made, but also this stuff is so personalized that it will show anti-feminist content to the same people as well if they engage with it, which they tend to do, but only at the rate they’ll engage.. which is usually only to argue their point from a well establis…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:19 PM
2

I think it’s when you find someone unattractive for specific reasons that maybe you didn’t notice at first. Like turn offs. That’s what I thought at least. Examples would be like when someone is clingy and gets mad when you don’t text them back right away, or they’re overly touchy or sexual when you’re not feeling it, they start becoming controlling, hypersensitive, pouty, over shares, makes weird eating noises, constantly forgets to have money on them on purpose so you offer to pay, performativ…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 11:05 PM
19

If women bought jeans with better pockets, they’d make jeans with better pockets. They aren’t making clothes without functioning pockets because they don’t want to give women a place to put their change. They make them that way because women buy them. My guess is it’s because they are more comfortable and look better without bulky extra fabric underneath. It doesn’t make sense that they’d make pockets shorter just to save money when it’s just a few inches of fabric. Or make fake pockets to save …
/r/MensRights27/02/26 09:50 PM
-1

Compared to being unwelcome, being ignored is a lot closer to being welcome. It’s tolerance vs intolerance. If society is indifferent to one group but demonizes the other, I’d say the “indifferenced” group is a lot more welcome. Most anti-lgbt laws throughout history have only included males, which they didn’t offer respect to gender identity and have viewed trans men as women and trans women as men. They didn’t make the distinction. When you read about gay men in history, a narrative dominated …
/r/MensRights26/02/26 10:41 AM
0

Trans men definitely have been “more welcome” than trans women throughout history and they still are today. I’m not sure how that could even be debatable…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 05:12 AM
14

You sure it wasn’t the rate of murder committed by a parent? When a parent is the perpetrator in a child’s death, it’s something like always the mother worldwide statistically 100% of cases within the first year, then it’s both the mother and father as a perpetrator, but the rate of mothers remains higher until it evens out for a few years from like 11-13, then the rate becomes higher for fathers around 13 and raises onward.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:06 PM
2

I am anti feminist. It’s a label that implies anti-women though because most people aren’t aware of what feminism actually is. It’s exploitative. They’re not just racist, they’re racist and exploit racism, just like they do with every oppressed group. Intersectionality is basically exploitation and appropriation of any disadvantage or inequality. It’s no coincidence that feminist movements tend to pop back into existence whenever another social movement gains visibility. They’ve caused the curre…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 11:02 PM
11

They don’t allow anyone to appeal to young men. It’s impossible to be a male advocate without being labeled as a misogynist or anti feminist. A left wing appeal to young men would immediately be labeled as right wing. So it’s no surprise that the only ones willing to advocate for young men, and willing to be labeled as a right wing misogynist, are already right wing or misogynist.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 07:30 PM
6

“The problem is men” is such a lazy argument. Like… wow how profound
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 07:09 AM
7

Feminism is a built on propaganda so yea. The men there have been denied an identity that isn’t considered toxic, so they’ve made that into its own identity. There’s also the fact that by getting ahead of criticism and participating in it themselves, they avoid the accountability they claim men are supposed to have. They separate themselves from the men here as if mansplaining feminist rhetoric like scripture or “educating” people means they’re the actual men from the “not all men” myth. Some ar…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:43 AM
11

I think he’s a brother of one of the victims, I believe Virginia Giuffre. I saw about a week ago there was an interview with some of the victims and two men were sitting with the group, I thought they were trafficked themselves but it turned out they were there to represent their sister. Someone in another comment mentions male victims that came forward but can’t remember the name. They’re probably talking about Barrett Pall. He’s been posting about this and was in a documentary for the Abercrom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 09:54 PM
6

They have to test your levels in ordered to prescribe it. They can’t diagnose you with hypogonadism by symptoms alone. They can’t prescribe it for fatigue. They probably vary from one to the next but they are getting labs. Idk how often or what they consider low/high. It’s so simple to have a patient get bloodwork though so idk why they wouldn’t. I’ve been on it for a 10 years. Since I was 22. My levels were so low and haven’t even raised much since being on it tbh. I got it from my primary doct…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 09:24 PM
2

Damn that’s crazy. She’s abusing you and your kids. That kind of behavior is not healthy for them in their relationship with you, her, or their future relationships. I’d point none of this behavior out to her because she sounds extremely manipulative and on a power trip that she seems to think is justified. It’s better that she shows her crazy instead of getting hints on how to perfect it. Gives me ruby franke vibes
/r/MensRights06/02/26 07:03 PM
1

Because men wouldn’t let women have access to the privilege of work… since misogyny. Instead they married women to trap her in and make her have his kids who he also doesn’t want to raise, but wants her to. Men hate women but want them home at all times, so he can sit in silence in traffic for 2 hours a day in his leased Hyundai to commute to work. He gets the power of economic access for 8 hours a day whether it’s in an office, a cubicle, on a construction site, or manning a Taco Bell drive. He…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:00 PM
1

There are people who like to fantasize about being humiliated, humiliate others, being medical patients, being medical professionals, there are people who fantasize about being chairs… demons, demon chair hybrids.. so it’s kinda like never ending weirdness. This is tame
/r/MensRights03/02/26 09:31 PM
0

The other commenter gave you some sources. You seem to be more interested in dismissing anything that doesn’t align with your view than expanding it. Do you have proof that gender differences are mostly the result of socialization and biological sex differences are insignificant in how they influence gender? When you find it check where it comes from and what the researchers focus on. The humanities and social sciences are all feminist. Feminists push out anyone who doesn’t agree or has a perspe…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 08:50 PM
1

anthropologists and biologists know way more about human nature than we do Anthropologists especially emphasize how diverse gender roles are across societies. Anthropology uses feminist theory and is heavily biased by the goal of creating equity. It prioritizes ideology over academic integrity and honesty.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 06:21 PM
14

DARVO: Deny Attack Reverse Victim and Offender Feminists use the same tactics as psychologically manipulative people do in relationships to gain power and control. Shame, guilt, gaslighting, twisting every interaction into leverage, implying there’s malicious intent or harm done by men who are too privileged to even understand themselves.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:58 PM
5

Victoria Woodhull owned a stock brokerage firm on Wall Street, owned a weekly newspaper, and ran for president of the United States in 1872. She was also a mystical healer or fortune teller or something and made a ton of money, spent it all, then went on to open a brokerage and newspaper and make tons of money again. She and her sister owned both businesses. All before 1872 Have you even looked up the laws? Or just read blogs and articles that intentionally misinterpret and distort history?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:09 PM
9

Women were always allowed to get a bank account. Women worked, owned businesses, owned property, etc. Before 1974? Are you serious? Single women were always financially independent. Married women weren’t financially independent just like men weren’t financially independent in a marriage.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:38 AM
9

Women were able to vote at different times in different states in the U.S. since it became the U.S. Women were always financially independent by law in the U.S. unless they were married. Single women could do whatever they wanted. Married women needed a signature from their husband since marriage meant he was liable for her debts. Idk what you’re talking about with the elementary school thing lol.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:10 AM
0

Improving our lives over time but yet everyone is more miserable and can’t afford anything lol. Like yea I got an iPhone for $1300 but it will be obsolete in a couple years, it gives me access to those services that track my every scroll, tap, and click, so it can collect, combine, and analyze it to figure out how to make me pay as much as possible for more services that give them more data, so they can sell me more goods and more services that keep me dependent on a tier subscription plan with …
/r/MensRights17/01/26 07:42 AM
5

So a couple of points here. First, the good news; your girlfriend did not inform you that her BJ's were based on equal reciprocation, so about that you are NTA. Now the bad news. You are still an AH, and let me explain why. 70% of women cannot orgasm from PIV sex, so odds are your girlfriend is in that category. That means that your "I don't like it" attitude means the only way she is likely to orgasm with you is from a hand job. Have you been making sure she is finishing? I would guess not. Thi…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:31 PM
1

Women only got the right to vote in 1920 in the U.S. Hell it was illegal for women to own credit cards in their names until 1974. These are two obvious examples of women’s oppression. It’s clear they were oppressed. Common sense. Unless… these facts are somehow inaccurate? Or technically true but intentionally misleading? Women could vote before 1920 depending on the state and specific qualifications. Many men weren’t allowed to vote either. It was tied to land ownership, paying taxes, race, rel…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 10:58 AM
11

It’s not much different in the U.S. A woman can be charged with rape if she penetrates a man anally with her finger or something without his consent. Or if she penetrates another woman vaginally/anally/orally with a body part or object without consent she can be charged with rape. They changed the definition “to include men”, but only in the sex acts that involve other men 99% of the time unless women are fingering or pegging men without their consent.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:16 AM
100

No but for real.. how can both plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, yet she faces a maximum of 5 years and he faces a maximum of 20?
/r/MensRights05/01/26 11:04 AM
7

Gay men are not equal to cisgender women in privilege are you kidding? Lesbians are more privileged than gay men as well. Also asexual and pan aren’t more marginalized than gay men. Anti homosexuality laws almost exclusively targeted gay and bisexual men. Many of the laws didn’t include lesbian or bisexual women at all. Gay and bisexual men were killed, castrated, and imprisoned throughout history. It’s crazy that people think women aren’t equally as awful as men lol. These types of ranking syst…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 04:49 AM
7

During my time as a teen in the 2000s-2010, women were both openly meaner towards each other while also more empowering. That’s how it seemed at least. No one was really putting women down in a general sense, most people seemed to be about women’s empowerment but without the empowerment in spite of men trying to push them down or whatever. Now women are mean to men and bully each other in more “woke” or anti woke ways with an inauthentic moral policing kind of way. The you go girl attitude of to…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 11:52 PM
19

It has been since the second wave. It’s just that feminists have been the ones framing the history.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:58 PM
10

They see males as something to regulate. It’s a mass hysteria of narcissism where being the victim justifies reshaping society in a way that dehumanizes and disempowers men through guilt, shame, and invalidating any male identity or sense of entitlement. It’s as if the world revolves around women because men are soulless. They’ve had little pushback because at the end of the day men care more about women than they do about men. There’s empathy that men, women, and children have for women that th…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:48 PM
2

Falsely accusing someone of rape, which you’re saying likely involved physically beating and giving the victim an std, when they did not do those things, should be considered rape. Having consensual sex with someone and then lying and saying it was rape is basically committing rape because it couldn’t have been consensual on the accused’s part. It completely changes what happened in a violating and exploitative way. It wasn’t a consensual act. It was rape by deception. I can imagine the anxiety,…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 11:02 AM
8

They probably already do consider it rape if they’re posting that. No one will call them out without being attacked so it’s like guaranteed validation and encouragement.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 09:18 PM
1

There were debtors prisons in the U.S. I meant discrimination based on sex or marital status. That became illegal in the late 1960s, actually never mind it was 1974 I guess, but it’s used to make statements like “women couldn’t even open a bank account until the 70s” They take the law that banned banks from discriminating based on material status/sex, reverse it, and imply that women were banned from banking until then. They do this with a lot of stuff. Banks want to make money for sure which is…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 10:29 PM
4

Honestly, I’m very skeptical of any history around this subject lol. It’s crazy how much history is distorted and never called out. Finding accurate info is a challenge and people just.. accept it apparently. Digging through online sources is a pain. Chat bots lie, but they slip up and you can get them to contradict themselves and call it out then check the sources. My understanding is that married women weren’t allowed to sign legal contracts without her husband’s signature because of coverture…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 08:49 PM
7

Back before the 1960s? There was never a law banning women from getting a bank account. A husband was responsible for any debt though.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 10:34 AM
12

Married women had to get consent from their husband to open a bank account because marriage meant a shared legal identity. The men were liable for any debt though. Single women had nearly the same economic freedoms as men. Feminists distort history to portray marriage signing over everything to the husband, when in reality it was equal ownership with legal responsibility only for the man. Women worked, owned property, owned businesses, etc. One woman was even a US presidential candidate in the l…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 01:58 AM
5

Which is exactly why they also can’t be used to say false accusations are 2-10% either, but they do. They take the number of rapes, reported and estimated as unreported (self report survey), and then take the number of reports that are determined to be false with evidence that proves the accusation was a lie and could not have happened. There has to be a reason to believe the accuser is lying, not just wrong or mixing up days or even the perpetrator, and even if it’s clear she’s lying there has …
/r/MensRights15/11/25 02:43 AM
3

Thanks. Alimony is such a hard thing to wrap my mind around. It makes sense in some cases I guess, but long term or permanent is like a life sentence of torture that disincentivizes mercy the more brutal it is.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 10:10 AM
1

It’s fair in the sense that they’d both be seeing the same part of the other. She’s not entitled to do or see anything he’s not comfortable with, but she’s entitled to ask. It’s not unreasonable. Demanding someone to do something they don’t want to do is unfair, especially if she’s using something she did consensually to justify her demanding him to do it after the fact. If it bothers her and she doesn’t want to be in the relationship that’s her right. It’s a hill she’s got to live on if she’s g…
/r/MensRights14/11/25 09:45 AM
2

Video removed or ?
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:54 AM
-18

She’s saying she’s entitled to see his ass if he sees hers.. and he’s entitled to say no. No where does she say she’s entitled to “do” anything. Things like this are so ridiculous. I don’t see anyone arguing that “no” doesn’t mean “no”. This post seems to be arguing that if someone says no to something the person who asked isn’t allowed to have an opinion about it.. she’s allowed to be a weirdo and talk about being a weirdo, she’s not entitled to infringe on a persons privacy or touch them.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:11 AM
-22

Pushing each other’s boundaries in relationships isn’t a bad thing. There’s way too much focus on analyzing everything through a victimization lens. You should not be in a relationship with someone if they don’t trust you or you don’t trust them enough to ask for something without it feeling like there’s coercion or force. If I say no to something sexual or uncomfortable, I would feel much differently if my partner pushed back and convinced me to reconsider (for whatever reason) than I would if …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:00 AM
2

Yea but feminists are homophobic specifically towards men. Obviously they won’t say that, just like they deny misandry. When you say “women fighting for equality” what do you mean? Gay rights have never been a feminist cause. In fact, they’ve been against the gay rights movement. Equality has been labeled as assimilation when it comes to gay men. The term queer is a major factor in this. It’s basically a tool for distortion and appropriation. It was reclaimed by feminists for the very purpose of…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 11:30 PM
5

Women’s health is important and they should have their pain taken seriously, but I don’t think the issue is sexism when it comes to care. If we look at the standards in men’s healthcare to evaluate women’s healthcare, equality isn’t what we should be trying to accomplish. Doctors should be taking everyone’s health seriously. If my doctor is gaslighting me, it doesn’t make it okay because they also gaslight you.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:17 PM
42

I don’t think the failures of the healthcare industry isn’t a sex based issue caused by misogyny or sexism, but it’s framed that way, ironically because people care about women’s health much more than they care about men’s. Doctors might not take women’s pain seriously or fail to diagnose their conditions, but they aren’t treating men any better. Men’s issues are dismissed and they’re gaslit as well, but men can’t really be vocal about it or spread awareness when “women have it worse”. Women hol…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:56 AM
22

Wow… urinals are cleaner and so much more efficient. I can’t think of any reason this would make sense. It’s pretty obvious why they did this though right? Men having shorter lines in restrooms and a more efficient way to pee isn’t equitable. They’ll start calling men who stand up to pee “toxic masculinity” next. I wouldn’t be surprised if they already do!
/r/MensRights09/11/25 08:46 PM
30

Pretty gross how those women can’t just be honest and say they don’t care if it happens to boys. They rather exploit it, weaponize it, and make it into content. It’s embarrassing. I think things are going to change in the next few years and I’m not sure how it’s going to look for them. I mean, they’re using other people’s oppression from decades before they were born to justify misandry online. They’re proud of it. It gives them a sense of unity, but everything they post online is collected data…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 01:04 PM
7

It’s always been that way. Laws against homosexuality have targeted men almost exclusively. Homosexuality was never illegal for women in the UK or US for example.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:38 PM
1

I was being sarcastic. This post is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 07:09 PM
-8

Dogs were oppressed until feminism. Bitches couldn’t even open a bark account until 1986. Thank you intersectionality
/r/MensRights26/10/25 10:15 AM
13

Yea I didn’t know who this was until I saw one of the top comments in an askreddit post asking what famous person deserves an apology or some shit was “Lorena Bobbitt”. She faced zero consequences besides 45 days of mental health treatment in a hospital. She didn’t even have to pay for his medical bills. The whole thing has been beneficial to her financially and she’s made a career out of it. He was a piece of shit, but her defense would have been abuse whether it was true or not. She was clearl…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:56 AM
1

I get that my wording might not be the most effective but I have no idea what you’re trying to say in this comment.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 08:58 PM
16

My issue with feminism is the dishonesty, narcissism, gaslighting, and manipulation that requires men as an enemy and oppressive power that must be accountable for all social inequality in history, both as a group and on an individual level, despite the fact that most men are not misogynistic and support women’s rights and equality, at least in most western countries. I mean, the idea that men simply hate women is just bizarre but it’s so often repeated (and demanded) that people actually believ…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:49 AM
3

Yes. Every year the FBI releases hate crime data and gay men are always the most targeted out of all anti-LGBTQ crimes. There were 1217 anti-gay male and 195 anti-lesbian hate crimes in 2024 Most anti-homosexuality laws throughout history have mainly targeted male-male homosexuality. In the US and UK there were never laws criminalizing homosexuality between women. There has been a strange shift when looking at online sources for stuff like this, where making any distinction between men and women…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 10:43 PM
3

Having too many expectations for a person to meet can make it hard too. What doing equality look like to you?
/r/MensRights03/10/25 10:27 AM
13

Holy shit I googled and this popped up: “CLEARED ‘Super sperm donor’ walks free after being cleared of raping ex as she tried to dump him The delighted dad wept with relief as he was found not guilty by a majority verdict” This was in June 2025 ! Anyways I read a court doc on the stripper case and it sounds like he was hired but some of the guests weren’t told he was coming. It sounds like a case of objectifying a man as a disposable piece of meat and drama. They hired him to humiliate himself, …
/r/MensRights01/10/25 10:13 AM
3

The question you ask doesn’t require a consensus because this isn’t a divisive power-grab appraisal system like feminism is.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:49 PM
1

What feminist literature did you read that talks about the male loneliness epidemic
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 06:00 AM
14

Yea there’s a lot of weird demands and policing coming from the same male advocacy group recently. It seems like bad actors are at play.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 09:57 PM
4

Masculinity is not something you can reject. It’s something you should aim to accept. You can escape slavery, but you’re never really free if you’re always on the run, and you want to run from a word that follows you wherever you go. Encouraging men’s rights activists to reject masculinity is the most feminist thing you could do. It’s like asking a gay person “have you tried not being gay? Just don’t be gay and people won’t have a reason to be homophobic.”
/r/MensRights17/09/25 01:36 PM
5

They absolutely have a basis in biology. What cultures have completely different definitions of masculinity and femininity?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 12:19 PM
3

A pedophile is someone who is attracted to prepubescent children. A teacher or priest having sex with a 17 year old is statutory rape and an abuse of power, but it is not pedophilia just because they are a teacher or priest.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:46 PM
1

There’s not a single comment saying he’s “lucky”. The post is about victim rationalizing it. That’s what the comments are about. No one’s saying it’s a good thing or agreeing that “it’s okay”. No one’s saying shes not a creep or excused either. The post is obviously fake but the situation is very real. I’m not sure what you expect the commenters to say… that they can’t relate? There’s a power imbalance and an age gap. Do you think someone who’s groomed is aware they’re groomed or just snaps out …
/r/MensRights10/09/25 06:18 AM
-8

No one is idolizing or defending her in those comments though… they’re saying they understand the 17 year old being a naive 17 year old.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 03:15 AM
7

I have no idea about these people but I’ve found this to be a very common strategy used in feminism. Just look at intersectional feminism itself. Intersectionality is used to appropriate the oppression of marginalized groups and to maintain a feminist-dominant narrative in academia. Check this out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_history History is basically being rewritten based on ideology based on history based on ideology. There is a lot of manipulation and abuse. They believe men have…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:38 AM
27

It’s funny because you see articles online “men stop trying to fix things and learn how to listen to women to be supportive. Sometimes they want to vent and be heard.” It’s like a tough situation to be in because you want to help them find a solution and it can be hard to validate everything they say and know when they actually do want help. Especially because a lot of the time they say things in a way where you have to guess. Then later they act like you should have known. Also gets annoying wh…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:37 PM
27

That quote paints a clear picture of this women’s mindset. She assumes that since she is seeking help from them, her behavior is their responsibility. The more problems she creates and the more boundaries she pushes, the more vulnerable and less accountable she is for her actions. Supposedly she found this attractive male psychiatrist, who’s the same age, by accident after randomly selecting the first google result. She went in there and figured any boundaries she pushed were his responsibility,…
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:33 PM
2

You think a desire to molest a child is the same as homosexual desire? Because you’re claiming not to make the argument against committing the act, while saying homosexuality has been treated identically unjust… So do you believe homosexual relationships should be outlawed and punished? Or do you believe pedophilia should be legalized? Also is a pedophile not hetero, homo, or bisexual? Just its own distinct sexual orientation? Because if it’s not, what is it? Sexual orientation is an attraction …
/r/MensRights12/08/25 10:22 PM
2

I don’t think they deserve the death penalty for simply existing, or that it’s in their control to have an uncontrollable attraction, but no, pedophilia is not somehow linked or similar to homosexuality. We’re talking about sexual attraction. Whether or not you believe a man being attracted to another man is caused by genetics, prenatal hormones, socialization, not enough sports growing up, too much sports growing up, or exposure to a Britney Spears music video on a full moon, doesn’t make a dif…
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:55 AM
7

Why homosexuals?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:08 PM
20

https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/menslib trollchromosomes witchesvspatriarchy breadtube purplepilldebate bestof ftm sapphoandherfriend mensrights twoxchromosomes thegirlsurvivalguide menwritingwomen mendrawingwomen rpghorrorstories Lostgeneration philosophy cptsd badwomensanatomy anarchism anime_titties askaliberal bisexual
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/25 09:25 AM
28

Psychologist and author Lisa Damour specializes in adolescent development: “Girls hit puberty before boys do. So what this means is that for 7th grade boys in general, the girls are often beating them at recess and then they come into the classroom and the girls are often beating them in school. “So if you are a 12- or 13-year-old boy and you have had a very rough day at school where a girl outran you at recess and then had all the right answers when you didn't understand what was happening in c…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:59 AM
12

My question is: does anyone buy this “free labor” thing? In terms of cooking, cleaning, laundry, etc. these seem like the worst part of moving in with someone. Living with another person is sharing a space and dealing with certain sets of expectations, where you’re always kind of picking up after each other and learning how to just with not doing things in the way you normally do or prefer. You see this with roommates all the time. Both always seem to think they’re doing all the cleaning and the…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/08/25 11:37 AM
1

Women who cheat are actually twice as oppressed because it’s twice as many men. Intersectionality2 and equity maximized. We should send her an edible arrangement the poor thing
/r/MensRights20/07/25 02:09 PM
9

What’s worse is feminists have made sure every men’s space allows women, even places that they would never go to themselves, even places that had 1 hour of the day women weren’t allowed. They went all over America and had sit-ins and threatened them with anti discrimination laws. Okay but what’s worse than that, they’ve been doing this to gay male-only places as well. Like a gay resort in Florida that allowed nudity by the pool and certain areas of the resort. They had rooms women could stay in,…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:54 AM
15

The “male gaze” is less objectifying than insisting famous women are famous for/because of the male gaze. Attractive people are cast for the audience they represent imo. They’re not hot because the audience is watching to get off, they’re hot because hot people are idolized and envied. It’s like how people blame the sexualization of pop stars on men when the target audience isn’t men, the videos aren’t getting views by horny straight men.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 08:28 PM
8

She should be charged for the crime for producing and distributing. Why not? She should also be charged for fraud or forgery or whatever. There are teens who get charged for sending a photo of themselves to a girl or boyfriend. Why would this not be the same thing but with a lot more work to defraud everyone and obvious intent with lots of time to decide not to do it. There’s no coercion is there? I have not followed the case. She was 15 but the “can’t consent” part shouldn’t be some kind of loo…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 08:54 AM
1

COINTELPRO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO?wprov=sfti1#Range_of_targets
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:16 AM
1

Ever heard of COINTELPRO? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO?wprov=sfti1#Range_of_targets
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:12 AM
45

This is the case for both males and females, except females are more developed. Saying half their brain isn’t developed yet is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Are kids exposed to more violence these days? In 1995 there was a lot less concern about exposure to violence, the internet has become more accessible but there’s more awareness to the dangers now too. In 1995 you’d see all kinds of toy guns for kids, swords, knives, grenades, etc. If these were boys they call them redpill misogynists a…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:05 AM
1

There’s not much to dissect. Many men were circumcised as a baby and the only silver lining is that at least with a large amount of men there’s more awareness and more support, voices are more likely to be heard. People would judge the way a circumcision looked/felt if it wasn’t the norm, like they have with uncircumcised men in the US. In 50 years people will look back and wonder wtf was wrong with society today. Hopefully.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:09 AM
1

Here’s my advice: get a journal or use you phone and write 10 things you’re grateful for. If 10 is too many just write whatever you can. I do this sometimes when I’m in an anxious depressed state when I can, it seems to help. Also one thing I’ve thought about lately is that there are guys who have to get circumcised for health issues later in life, so at least the normalization of it makes it easier for them and they’re not alone. It still needs to be stopped, but it would be pretty shitty if I …
/r/MensRights25/06/25 11:26 AM
0

Most guys just round up to the nearest inch and a half to 2 inches anyways.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:12 AM
1

I wouldn’t really use the screen shots about being kicked out to prove rape or assault because even if it helps show she’s obviously abusive, accusing her of rape only after she kicked you out might make it seem like you’re just retaliating against her.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:08 PM
1

This wouldn’t be considered rape even with the updated definition in the US. The definition of rape is based on penetration, but only the penetrator is capable of committing rape, a victim of rape is someone who’s penetrated. It honestly seems as if it’s intentionally misleading, but it’s defining rape in the context of charging someone with a crime, not to determine a victim. At least that’s my understanding. From the FBI: “The revised UCR definition of rape is: penetration, no matter how sligh…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:03 PM
2

Men are also more likely to trust research and react Pre positively when it’s conducted my women. When the research itself makes women look “bad” or worse at something compared to men, men thought it shouldn’t be published since it could have a negative impact on women. https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/people-are-more-sceptical-sex-difference-research-when-findings-favour-men
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:12 AM
2

It’s a great resource. I honestly don’t know of any current left wing reads for men. Everything is too politicized these days and the current political environment is too polarized. The left might even be more hierarchal than the right at this point. Advocating for males is seen as reinforcing oppressive power structures. Men have to climb down from the ladder on the right to get to the one on the left side, but if they climb up the ladder left side they still reach the same place. Men can’t be …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 12:23 PM
0

https://www.marxists.org/archive/index-mobiles.htm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 09:21 AM
5

If you want “left wing male advocacy” resources that are also approved by” the academy” you get feminist theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 10:45 AM
6

I started who stole feminism the other day and was hooked! But then I got side tracked because I had to look up the author, which led me to her Wikipedia page, and like all others who criticize feminists, it was basically just full of carefully worded negative opinions and accusations
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 10:36 AM
0

That’s not what that story says. It’s says they’re closer to their cis women’s brains than cis men are to cis women’s brains. It shows a graph and everything. It says they’re still significantly closers to cis men’s brains but closer to cis women’s than cis men are to women’s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 03:51 PM
1

Most snark subs
/r/MensRights16/04/25 10:54 AM
10

I thought the same thing when I read it! The article says: “Young people who might have felt very isolated in some of their ideas and interests might never even have thought of some of the things which they’re now accessing … so people are getting both content and validation.” So why bring it to their awareness? Then: com networks were believed to have hundreds of people in the UK alone. “The scale we’re talking about is beyond human intervention. There are too many users, too much traffic.” Lik…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 01:43 PM
20

Idk how old you are but unless you’re a pre colonial ghost haunting this sub, you might want to let go of the things that happened like 6 great grandmas ago. Also.. even with feminist inclusive history (or whatever it’s called) rewriting the past, 200 years ago for voting rights is pretty far fetched and counter productive to the other fake narratives.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:19 AM
0

We need to stop mirroring the toxic feminist ideals that leverage sexual attraction to use as a weapon. Objectifying someone is not the same as finding them attractive or appreciating their beauty.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/25 01:37 AM
2

100 boys die a year in the United States from circumcision. 3%+ have complications that are bad enough to be documented. But a lot of circumcisions that are done poorly will go unnoticed until puberty, like when they’re done too tight, plus there’s scarring which nothing can be done about. This isn’t even going into the psychological effects and the loss of pleasure, functionality, and feelings of betrayal or body autonomy. The rates of circumcisions are a lot lower now, the awareness is growing…
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:59 AM
1

My theory is evolutionary differences in emotion and social aspects of community. Women aren’t more or less, but different due to being mothers. They have a different kind of emotional intelligence based on communal bonding and protecting/nurturing their children. They have to be emotionally receptive and anticipate needs/ look after/ respond to non verbal communication, which makes them empathetic, which then makes them react to beauty and art differently, which then ties into self expression a…
/r/MensRights02/02/25 02:12 PM
6

If you’re wondering why they didn’t mention child abuse or murder of children it’s cause mothers leads those stats
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 12:23 PM
59

I think a lot of the activity in men’s lib is just feminist women keeping things in check
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 05:23 PM
15

War Hawk Hilary and her failed attempts at feigning compassion and constructing moving statements.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/01/25 02:47 PM
48

Feminists will cite an extra credit survey where men are asked questions in a way that makes it sound like they’re being asked something different, intentionally misleading to get the desired response, with an added hypothetical “would you do this bad thing if there were no consequences and no one knew?” - but will go to great lengths to find some way to discredit actual real data with no conflict of interests if it happens to humanize men or make victims. The case is awful. It’s definitely an u…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:07 AM
32

Can’t tell if you see this as a good thing or not but it sounds like you’re trying to Pavlov yourself to associating erections and jerking off with women being dicks? Like instead of working out your trauma you’re trying to reinforce it.. so you can’t stop masturbating and also swear off women until marriage. I’m trying to think of something to offer, but too much is going on here and you seem pretty motivated lol. Plus I guess you didn’t ask for advice. I will say that there’s nothing wrong wit…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 09:49 AM
11

Yea crazy that no one actually looks to substantiate the claims. Women chose the same methods men do just on a smaller scale for each. In most countries both men and women die from suicide by hanging. Women in the US chose hanging or gun as a method and it’s only in recent years that they aren’t using a gun more often than hanging it’s about even though. Men use guns must often in the US but it’s one of few countries where it’s the most common. It’s a common thing that comes up when suicide is t…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/24 06:18 AM
56

“I think I deserve better” She’s monetary
/r/MensRights14/12/24 05:21 AM
22

Only 8% of allegations turn out to be false! RAINN says only 3 out of every 100 rapists faces consequences. They say 5 out of 100 are convicted and only 3 face jail time. Right? Believe all women was something that made sense years ago because I think most took it to mean don’t doubt their account or dismiss them because it’s a difficult thing to speak up about. But it’s been made clear that feminists use wording and phrases with the intention of twisting the original message to mean something d…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:31 AM
3

The definition is describing an act committed by one person to another person. It’s not describing a non consensual act that goes either way. penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person It’s clearly stating that rape is non consensual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth by a sex organ of another person, or the penetration of the vagina or anus with a body part or object You can be raped (penetra…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 02:04 PM
84

The Maxwell to Sartre’s Epstein. She used to bring him young girls and had a girlfriend 30 years younger than her she ended up adopting for inheritance reasons.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:43 PM
207

Drinking doesn’t make you unable to consent. This idea was created to increase sexual assault numbers on surveys to promote the idea of rape culture and demonize men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:09 PM
1

You mean that survey that used language to ask men questions a way to make them sound like something else, so they’d get the desired answers? The one that’s been cited thousands of times? I guess that doesn’t narrow much down though. Try these links for a good breakdown Would A Third of Male Students Commit Rape? – Methodological Flaws in New Study Barbara Kay: Rape culture proofiness feeds moral panic over non-existent epidemic Exaggerating With Statistics About Rape
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:00 AM
5

I don’t think it was really a misandrist thing but more like a father or husband sacrificing himself like “honorable” and “strong” thing to do, while leaving a woman and child to fend for themselves wouldn’t. Not everything has an underlying misandrist or misogynistic meaning. I think that’s a big part of the issue with today. There’s too much of a need to find a deeper meaning that can be used as leverage against an “oppressor.” It’s basically what feminism is though. The idea that the world is…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 06:22 AM
13

Imagine being a woman born in like 2005, the thought of living in the time of dial up internet and land line phones is incomprehensible, but she’s totally “severely oppressed” like women from 1642 or some shit.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/24 09:32 PM
2

Yea and the censorship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 04:35 PM
18

That’s the thing, these aren’t exclusive traits. The only people that are saying they’re exclusive are feminists in this context. Stoicism might be used to describe masculinity but it doesn’t have a masculine meaning. is it any different than emotional resilience or strength? These are all pretty fundamental traits that describe femininity and masculinity, the only difference is who they’re applied to. Outside of physical characteristics in sexual development, masculine and feminine aren’t used …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 12:22 PM
67

Because feminists don’t believe in positive masculinity. Go search positive masculinity on the Askfeminists sub and you’ll see. They use of positive words to describe masculinity are met with “why do these traits have to be masculine?” “Women can be all these things”. They don’t want men to be empowered by change, they fight for the opposite then blame men for feeling paralyzed. They want men to be changed by feeling guilt, shame, and controlled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 09:59 AM
11

In contrast to the stereotypes of the ‘gentler sex,’ female slaveholders were just as vicious and calculating as men By showing the enormous financial interests white women had in slavery and the steps they took to secure those interests, Jones-Rogers provides proof that these women often were no different from their male counterparts. Yet, the image of the kind, nurturing white woman is deeply ingrained in our culture when it comes to race relations.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 09:36 AM
17

I always see this about pain, but women receive 65% of total opioid prescriptions and use them for longer. Women who over 40 receive more than any other age group, and twice as many as men in their age group.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:17 AM
3

The study was a survey that intentionally used careful wording to lead men to the answers that supported their beliefs. “if nobody would ever know and there wouldn’t be any consequences” is also the only part of the question provided in the article linked to the study that is not accessible without paying. After finding the study, they don’t even list the actual survey questions they asked. It’s a “research” with the intention of sensationalizing rape culture at the expense of “all men” Studies …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 05:48 AM
14

Lol they do? In my experience there are a lot of straight women who expect gay men to fit stereotypes and be into the same things women are, and they treat them differently than both women and straight men. It can be innocent but it can be very shallow and one dimensional. Seeing them as a caricature or an accessory. They tend to but then in a box to fill a certain role and kinda of ignore their actual unique qualities relatable in other ways than gender and sexual interests. It’s not a universa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 09:09 PM
1

Well it’s pretty even split in pro life/choice so I think you should probably care. You can’t expect name calling to work to change people’s minds. The political divide in this country has become so hostile with a huge gap between them that makes it more and more difficult to meet in the middle, let alone get people to switch sides. But people refuse to have discussions anymore or even debates. Part of the issue is US politicians exploit this divide for votes and campaigning and it’s never going…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:03 AM
78

The fact that she doesn’t even consider jumping in herself, but expected random strangers to immediately act without hesitation, simply because they were men, is a great example of todays gender inequality. I feel bad for her sons because I’m sure she would have blamed them if something happened and they didn’t know what to do. Like does this woman not realize her entitlement? If her daughter had drown I doubt she’d even question her response since yelling should have been more than enough. Men …
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:15 PM
7

Feminists believe society is built to the standards of men. They even believe male dominance created gender altogether and have convinced women otherwise so they meet the standards of men.They think we’d all be ungendered if it weren’t for patriarchy and women and men would have basically non distinct psychology, behavior, personality etc. They cherry-pick and contradict themselves though. Many will just follow along with the rest and not even understand the words they’re using. ALL of these are…
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:38 AM
8

The lethal methods part means nothing really. Suicide is suicide and in every country every method has a much higher percentage of men dying. It’s sad to think about anyone committing suicide especially on a large scale. I wish feminists wouldn’t feel the need to have some copy and paste bullet point rebuttal or counter argument to every single issue men face. Why do they always want to be the victim even when it’s clear men are killing themselves, they want to flip it around? Like it doesn’t ne…
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:42 AM
11

She was the Maxwell to Sartre’s Epstein. They made a game out of finding girls for 3-ways. She abused 3 underage students of hers, had another long term girlfriend who was much much younger than her and she ended up adopting her for inheritance purposes I think.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:26 AM
0

People are reading this in defensive mode and interpreting it in a very different way than anything you said. We need to stop assuming all opinions from men are in bad faith with ulterior motives and need to be discredited. They don’t care if the incorrect conclusion that they were drugged leads to more people assuming they were also, and leading to it becoming a thing men do often, and part of “how men are”, and it’s definitely because there’s a increasing amount of people writing about how ter…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:01 AM
2

No OP is saying that most case of people thinking they’ve had their drinks spiked, they actually haven’t. That spreading around the idea that people are getting their drinks spiked is irresponsible when it’s not true. It leads to a growing number of people thinking they probably had it happen to them when they actually just drank too much. Then more people start believing there’s a rampant issue of people drugging people, they assume this or that person must have done it, rumors spread, people t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:41 AM
6

The complication rate is about .5% in infants, which means doctors are botching 1 in every 200 circumcisions and that’s still somehow acceptable and worth doing for an unnecessary surgery. But that’s just reported complications on infants. The number goes up to 5% if it’s done later which a lot of people do. I think Muslims do it around 8. And again, this is reported, not a bad circumcision, but one that is so bad that it’s documented. How many guys are go through puberty with painful erections …
/r/MensRights17/08/24 05:36 AM
10

I feel like a lot of these opinions are not coming from with direct or witnessed interactions with men, online or in real life, but instead come from the increasing amount of post that come from women/feminists. The post is about how men “talk to each other in their spaces about women” but what spaces? Where are these men’s spaces? I know that I’ve seen this said quite often, as well as Reddit being “so misogynistic and the mods and admin doing nothing about the rampant hate speech” but like thi…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/24 07:20 AM
7

Because feminists promote the idea that boys grow up being their parents pride possession, while girls are forced into unnatural gender roles constructed to fit male standards. Boys have the privileges girls don’t, they’re encouraged to, while girls are discouraged from following their dreams or pursuing their interests. Girls have it so bad that even their mothers wish they were boys apparently, all while holding them back from doing anything boys do.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:53 AM
4

And cleaner because you’re not touching any doors or locks and flushing a toilet is much grosser than a urinal
/r/MensRights07/08/24 01:07 PM
2

Being a housewife isn’t equal to being the breadwinner. He leaves, works, comes home, and brings a paycheck. That’s a very organized and documented quantifiable contribution. A housewife is ‘working’ without a schedule or a paycheck and doesn’t get to leave work when she’s done. Her work is her personal life, marriage and family, and is evaluated by her husband and kids whether they admit or not. They don’t notice the work as much as they expect it, meaning they expect a clean house, clean laund…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 12:08 AM
10

I just want point out that 100% of neonaticides are committed by the mother worldwide. The father or anyone else is so statistically insignificant that they aren’t even counted. Mothers kill their kids more than fathers up to around age 5. From there it’s about 50/50 until around 13. 13-18 it’s more likely the father than the mother, but the parents aren’t even the most likely to be the perpetrator at that point anyway.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/08/24 08:59 AM
1

I’m pro choice. I don’t think a woman should become a mother if she doesn’t want a kid. The mother and father are responsible for the choices they make and there’s always a risk, but forcing them to have a kid is not going to make them good parents. Most people want kids anyways, so getting pregnant right after high school can have a huge impact on their lives and the kids life, that could be drastically different if they were to have waited. I personally think terminating the pregnancy at the s…
/r/MensRights29/07/24 03:06 AM
6

Grindr, the app that went from a dating app for gay men to the “queer” app, is saying other apps treat men badly? Grindr lets straight women and all the umbrella gender and sexualities on the app. Since queer is now under feminist jurisdiction, sexuality and gender are fluid and not fixed or biological. This means afab (assigned female at birth) who have no intention of transitioning other than pronouns (no hormones or surgeries) can identify as a yaoi gay boy femboy twink. Grindr also allows ev…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 12:11 AM

women go months without being hugged as well. Wonder why
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:13 AM
1

People don’t care about same sex either other than to use against gay men or trans women. There’s also those who seem to defend abusers if they’re trans or gay men. But male abuse victims are always dismissed. Which is pretty crazy because there’s been such widespread abuse of young boys for this very reason, and it’s still kind of brushed off. For example the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts, but those are just organizations with records and a public image. In the past boys have been less protect…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:30 AM
11

Yea. Attempting 3x more often is not exactly considerate either. It keeps family in a constant state of worry and guilt.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:15 AM
14

The suicide rates are like this in every country, and in a lot of those countries the most common method is by hanging. But in the US men have higher rates of completed suicide in each of the common methods categories- firearm, suffocating, and poisoning.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 05:47 AM
1

This happens with a lot of people, where they become assholes in public. It’s not a thing only men do in relationships, women do it too, friends do it to each other, brothers, sisters, parents, etc. It means he’s comfortable with you, and he’s just showing you how he really is- an ass hole who needs to put himself above someone else in order to feel worthy. I feel like it’s a very childish way to be. Like I remember friends who were like this in groups of 3s but not just hanging out one on one. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:46 AM
10

Why not leave these comments up? People already don’t think misandry exists.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 03:20 PM
2

Well, funny this is they believe there’s no female or male brain and that gender is just a social construct, that gender is a patriarchal tool and that men have kept them from roles they have just as much interest in. Which ultimately suggests that the things they hate so much about men are actually a reflection of what they’d do if they were in the same position as men, with the privileges, power, social dominance, and level of control that’s talked about daily in not only feminist circles but …
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:05 PM
2

https://youtu.be/-yHM2vHT4eo?si=ISSdBhDH3BBJJB4Z This is an excellent video
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/24 09:48 AM
6

If doctors are dismissive of women’s pain, then why is it that women receive 65% of opioid prescriptions in the US?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:26 AM
-16

True, but FGM is only similar to male circumcision in only certain cases. There are 3-4 types, one removes the clitoral hood, one removes the entire clitoris, one the entire external genitals, one removes the entire external genitals and its sewn closed except for a small part to pee and for their periods. What’s worse, is after marriage it’s ripped open during intercourse and in some cases sewn back up. Edit: Let me clarify, a male circumcision should be labeled genital mutilation. Removing a p…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:09 AM
2

Yea they remove the entire outside, and one of them is everything on the outside is cut off and sewn closed only to be ripped open after marriage during intercourse. Some times it’s sewn closed again. The other two are removing the clitoris, and then the one similar to male circumcision is cutting off the clitoral hood. But yea, it’s pretty gross when the only time women talk about it is when it’s weaponized for feminist arguments against men.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:03 AM
1

One just plead guilty yesterday in the small town I’m in. It was a middle school 8th grade 14 year old. She found his instagram and messaged him, sent him nudes and then had sex with him (rape) in a locked classroom. She’s 46. She’ll face up to 4 years which seems like an extremely short sentence for a teacher raping a boy, especially since it’s clear it wasn’t a mutual interest thing. She took all those steps to find his social media in her free time. Former Teacher Admits to Having Sex with a …
/r/MensRights24/04/24 10:41 PM
4

You can do whatever you want. No one is enforcing rules upon women that aren’t also enforced upon men. My grandpa shouldn’t have to worry about getting robbed of his retirement savings, by his facebook catfish girlfriend, Eva Longoria, who’s in financial distress and having the worst luck each time he’s sent her bitcoin to pay for the flights she keeps missing- the man he’s been speaking with on the phone shouldn’t scam old people faking an Eva Longoria voice. Telling him “don’t random beautiful…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/24 11:01 AM
4

It’s like getting mad at someone because they had the audacity to recommend sunscreen at the beach in the middle of summer, then not wearing sunscreen because they recommended it, then blaming them for getting sunburned. It’s dumb as hell to confidently walk into danger simply because you shouldn’t have to worry about being preyed upon. Rapists shouldn’t rape, killers shouldn’t kill, thieves shouldn’t rob people, but they do, and it’s why people lock their doors at night.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/24 10:16 AM
1

Gay men have been hypersexualised A negative hyper sexualization throughout history. Labeled as as perverts, or sexual deviants, or as a stereotypical caricature in a joke. Remember the AIDS crisis? The media intentionally made it out as a gay disease that straight men couldn’t get and women couldn’t get it at all. Even called it gay cancer. Lesbians have been hyper sexualized though. Unlike gay men, they're not always seen as perverted, society perverts them instead, exploiting and sexualizing …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 01:54 AM
8

In the Middle Ages, chivalry was a set of rules for knights. They were expected to show courage, honor, courtesy, generosity, respect and to show gallantry towards women. This is a pretty good example of how patriarchy has been throughout history, for the most part. Men were expected to be the one who had to work and fight to protect his family. Feminists today have distorted history to make it seem like women were held captive as sex slaves, maids, and caregivers who were constantly terrified a…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/24 04:38 AM
1

Women have 65% of opioid prescriptions in the US. It’s a pharmaceutical greed issue not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:26 AM
3

It’s TikTok so most of them are probably 14 year olds. The older ones are just ignorant men who have no idea what damage it can do to a kid. There’s also men who have gone through something like this and either aren’t negatively affected or don’t realize how it affected them. Others who are left with lasting consequences.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:43 AM
1

The idea of a hierarchy should be used to analyze social issues and mistakes that have been made, not as a model for labeling current individual perceived privilege so we can stereotype and generalize, make a judgement on character and morals, or adjust opportunity and what they “deserve.” Intersectionality points out the importance of individual circumstances and doesn’t necessarily apply a hierarchy structure. BUT instead of using this to not make assumptions and provide open minded non judgme…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:10 PM
18

A high school “privileged white boy” was born in what… 2010..? Society’s been calling them privileged white boys since before they were even born. This kind of stuff is creating a further divide and animosity between the younger generation. The forced over correction of social issues is making everyone focued on oppressor/oppressed finger pointing, being taught that their current reality is equal to the past oppression throughout history, when they really aren’t the ones accountable for the past…
/r/MensRights06/04/24 05:56 AM
9

the patriarchy does in fact harm men. This is just manipulation lol. It’s basically a way of saying men are responsible for all gender inequality, gender roles, toxic masculinity, etc. in their world, even if women reinforce patriarchy and toxic gender roles, it’s men who made women think it’s the norm. They wouldn’t say it otherwise.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/24 09:14 PM
3

This isn’t misandry though since it’s being a man isn’t why she did it. If the comments said something about men in general, then yea it would be. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t quite a few misandrist comments on that thread, but the ones in the post aren’t.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/24 03:08 AM
9

Isn’t Andrew Tate’s following, or what used to be his following, boys aged 9-15? But also, women’s spaces online look like pure hate groups. They’re all full of constant campaigns against things like men getting any sympathy or support for mental health and see men’s suicide rates as an opportunity to make an organized list of bullet points explaining why men commit suicide because they want to leave a mess, traumatize his wife/girl that finds him, and use male suicide and male loneliness to man…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/24 03:58 AM
19

Are you saying your friend says women equate being annoyed that men acknowledge and sometimes interact with them in public- to fearing for their lives, and hate towards men is justified for this?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/24 08:43 PM
2

Queer theory is worst than feminism, but it’s ultimately feminism rebranded anyways. Queer theory is a lesbian perspective that comes from such a narcissistic and angry (although arguably justified) hate towards men that any other perspective is dismiss as biased, leaving the finished product biased itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 06:58 AM
46

Idk if I agree with these takes. Sexism is bad, but they’re not talking about sexism, they’re using patriarchy in the place of sexism to represent a single sided blame on men. It goes a step further than saying misogyny, because it labels all men in general as misogynistic by framing it that way while completely absolving all women from responsibility. Patriarchy isn’t just a male dominant society. It’s a system where men use gender to control and oppress women so they can remain dominant and ke…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 12:27 PM
7

This is because feminism has taken over the LGBT after 40+ years of attempting to push their ideology into mainstream through queer theory, they’ve managed to do so by conflating gender nonconformity with trans people, ultimately riding on the backs of the LGBT movement with the gained acceptance over the years, while also invalidating trans people, and anyone who believes in the biological causes of homosexuality, and gender and orientation being innate, immutable, and fixed. You can see this c…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:40 AM
2

Or Space for men exists Men mention men’s issues Women feel attacked and label it an incel hate group Women start labeling actual misogynistic behavior as the men’s space behavior “that’s misogynistic “men’s space” rhetoric” People assume the men’s space is a hate group without first hand knowledge Men avoid being associated with members of the men’s space and it remains stigmatized
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:06 AM
44

Because DEI in universities is mostly just feminists enforcing younger generations to my taught that men oppress women, rape, and even created gender roles to control them. It’s trickled down and spread to the younger generation.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:58 PM
4

Somehow, despite the lower libidos, we rape as much as men. ----- (Nope) Don’t most women say rape isn’t about sex and actually about power?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 05:47 AM
4

If this is true unable to hold property in her own name, any property or income was managed by the husband How would this be possible? responsible debts and taxes owed on wife’s property and income, essential liable for her financial decisions the husband could be prosecuted for wife’s actions
/r/MensRights01/02/24 09:51 AM
3

Sadly those in academic fields related to gender are feminists who believe there’s a bias in research that favors men, so they can just say “patriarchy” when provided evidence. They’ll keep teaching the distorted history of gender dynamics, and make it seem like men just absolutely hate women and prefer to keep it that way.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 04:20 AM
-1

Yea in my opinion it was a psychotic episode and sending her to prison would have been pretty pointless, but also the family lost their son and it can’t be easy to know the person who killed him is free. But we know if it were him that killed her, he’d be serving time and probably charged with murder. The reason I think she is telling the truth is because she barely knew the guy so I can’t really see an intent. She stabbed herself in the face and neck and also stabbed her dog. And she was still …
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:08 AM
2

I’ve had a suspicion for a while now that there’s an overlap between Reddit mods and Wikipedia elites lol. What’s always interesting to me is to look at the talk page on controversial Wikipedia articles.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:43 AM
-4

Hope he got fired. He took every opportunity to escalate the situation. Like threatening to smash her window inches from the her face when she tell him she’s scared?? Won’t point the flashlight out of her eyes, won’t say why he’s pulled her over, obviously intimidating and threatening to escalate a non threatening situation for high beams. Telling her she can’t call 911 seems really fucked up and stands out for some reason. Do people really watch this and think “well… should have listened” ? The…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/24 06:20 AM
23

That’s the problem. They think we were exactly the same, but created gender to oppress them. They think somehow men keep them from doing all the things men typically like to do, and have made them subordinate and controlled. Men created gender roles for women to keep them out of power, at home, dependent on men, intimidated by men, emotionally weak, physically weak, and incapable of independence. They believe they’re told they’re empathetic and nurturing to keep them at home with the kids while …
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:54 AM
-2

If they’re straight, men are getting it from women, who get it from men, who get it from women. Right?
/r/MensRights17/01/24 06:43 AM
-8

Get vaccinated. Seems like a shitty way to view women and an unhealthy way to view their bodies. Not to mention that women get it from men, likely because when men get it they show no signs and spread it. edit: meaning it’s sexually transmitted, not originating from men. Women who get it are more likely to get cancer or have other issues, but you talk like it’s an issue with women and not a problem that’s the responsibility of everyone. I wouldn’t touch a vagina with a 20 ft pole wearing a blind…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:23 AM
4

This one is weird to me and it’s funny because I saw an ask feminist post about this and all the comments were talking about how men control the makeup industry and the fashion industry 😂 But then a few days later a similar topic was brought up somewhere else, I think it was about wearing make up on a first date, and a lot of the comments were women saying they never wear makeup even on first dates.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:05 AM
2

Feminists have done enough and really need to back it up a bit. Young men and boys are being taught they’re toxic and all their accomplishments are in part due to privilege, but these men have no idea what it’s like to live in the world they claim we live in today, because for some reason feminists are unwilling to acknowledge the progress made in the past 20 years and act like women’s issues today are what they were even earlier than that. An 18 year old was born in 2005 or 2006. A high schoole…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:00 AM
11

It’s not just sexual assault. It’s gender inequality in general. Feminists are constantly focused on privileges that women don’t have. How they’re always going to be taken less seriously, sexualized, seen as less worthy. They teach young people that men are predatory, misogynistic, and abusive, and that women are disadvantaged, forced into gender roles and beauty standards, easily abused and taken advantage of. They focus on everyone’s flaws and want to hold men accountable for everything. It ta…
/r/MensRights01/01/24 09:01 AM
1

lol no don’t look down on yourself. You’re probably a lot more attractive than you think. Women just aren’t as upfront about it when they think a guys hot maybe? Idk With gay men it’s that we’re on even an even playing field with similar interests. Instead of men courting women and women waiting for the man to make the first move, it’s just men pursuing each other lol. It’s just easier to find guys to hook up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 03:10 AM
4

For this study, Wilhelm and Joeckel conducted an online survey that was distributed via political interest groups and a German news magazine site on Facebook. Sounds legit
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 11:21 PM
4

We have pretty high standards. A lot of gay men don’t get hit on at all so you should take it as a compliment. Gay men have no standards at all lol some do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 11:11 PM

do men actually defend male rapists? I've never met a man that would defend rape. when women are the perps, women say that she is a predator and a pos and that rape is wrong. I have seen the opposite of this actually. Women are harder to see as perps and easier to sympathize with. That's why they receive shorter sentences than men when they go to trial for crime. I've always seen the comments on these news articles and most people just see her as a predator, but there's always a few women who co…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 11:25 AM
3

Wouldn’t trust the peers either https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2301642120
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:48 AM
1

because female perps get a lot more media coverage No. Women are underrepresented in crime reporting because people don’t care as much. I’m asking why you think all men are responsible for male rapists, but women aren’t responsible for female rapists? cultural misogyny So even women who rape boys are victims?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:19 PM
1

Seems like there’s a female teacher caught sexually assaulting or raping a teen boy in the news every day lately. If that’s offensive to hear. Ask yourself “why?” Is it because you and every women you’re close with, are nothing like those women who prey on teenage boys?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:58 AM
5

You can’t be serious… breastfeeding in public was something women were equally against, if not more against than men. Women were certainly more vocally against it. Definitely didn’t make women “second class citizens” it was just some puritan nudity bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 05:36 AM

Polyamory is way more common for AFAB
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 11:22 PM
5

Do you think the IDF is any better to Palestinian women?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:04 PM
3

No he’s in public. No right to privacy. The irony of this comment
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 01:42 AM
2

Wow seriously? His wife cheated and fell in love with someone else, yet he’s to blame?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 11:11 AM

Wait I can’t tell if you’re serious
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 02:40 AM

Yes because everyone who’s successful because of their intelligence and creativity is autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 06:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter