~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | Woman won't face charges after admitting she lied about father raping her. He was sentenced to 15 years and served 9. Get your barf bags out.FTA: "[County Prosecutor Sue] Baur said Cassandra Kennedy will not be prosecuted for her apparent lies about her father, partly because prosecutors do not want to discourage people in similar circumstances from coming forward... "There should be no indictment of the system," she said. Instead, Baur said, it's simply a case of a victim withdrawing her story." So, remember that - it's not the system's fault. And also don't forget that she's still the "victim" here and she's just "withdrawing her s… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/12 01:01 PM |
| 1 | Russell Brand Doesn't Want Katy Perry's Money Despite No Prenup...but if the tables were turned? | /r/MensRights | 08/02/12 08:45 PM |
| 5 | Children win access to fathers. Children are for the first time to be given the legal right to have a proper relationship with both their parents after a divorce, The Telegraph can disclose.Just consider that title for a moment: "Children are for the first time to be given the legal right..." It would be ridiculous for a title to read "Blacks are for the first time to be given the legal right to use the same drinking fountains as whites" in today's day and age. Yet, fathers are generally still without rights to their children after divorce and almost no one but non-custodial fathers care. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/12 11:21 PM |
| 4 | "As we know, we cannot carve up a child’s existence on the basis of some spurious 50:50 split in terms of time". Why the hell not? What makes 50/50 "spurious?" So it's better to divide it into some other ratio? Fucking idiot, immoral politicians love to destroy the lives of children and fathers.This is no different than a politician saying "as we know, we cannot allow a black person equal access to drinking fountains based on some spurious claim that they exist and should, therefore, have equal rights." | /r/MensRights | 06/01/12 01:33 AM |
| 1 | Judge Orders Divorced Couple to Swap Facebook PasswordsJudges don't pay any attention to the Constitution. You think for one minute they give a rat's ass about TOS? | /r/MensRights | 16/11/11 03:38 AM |
| 4 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!That's one of the greatest things, if not THE greatest thing, about this idea. The terms of what will happen to the kids are worked out BEFORE the marriage. So, if your bride says that she won't agree to share the kids equally, you know exactly the kind of woman you are about to wed and you can run for the hills. If she does agree and you eventually get divorced, the kids will get equal time with both parents which pretty much every statistic out there proves is better for the children. This ide… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!I don't agree - I like what Mexico City is proposing. 2-years minimum, but then you get to custom define it. In fact, I'd let the couple custom-define the whole thing. Then again, I'd take government completely out of the marriage business. At the end of the day, that's what's causing most all of the trouble. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!I don't have the numbers, but I would bet that there are just as many conservative divorce judges happily redistributing wealth as liberal judges. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 03:31 PM |
| 0 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!To that point, I remember when I first started going through all of the hell. I thought to myself: "This really can't be the way it works. Otherwise, the entire world is going to destroy itself. It just can't be..." [Looks around] Yup. I was wrong. It can be... and is. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 03:46 AM |
| 7 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!We've destroyed marriage and as a consequence our society is falling due to it. FTFY. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 03:35 AM |
| 10 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!For me, I do support the idea of making a commitment to someone. Call it marriage or whatever you want. One thing's for certain: I will never get a government marriage license again. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 02:15 AM |
| 15 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!Imagine looking forward to a commitment event every 2 years with your partner instead of a lifetime of looking back on decaying love. This is a great point. It effectively pushes you to resolidify your vows every few years, and that might improve marriage quite a bit. It also motivates you to be thinking about that important date coming up - you'd better be working hard at it or your contract is going to expire. Think of it like a job - if you never got an annual review or checkpoints with an op… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 01:51 AM |
| 11 | Mexico City wants to implement a new marriage license: temporary marriage contract with option to renew. It would include how property and child custody would be acted upon if the marriage isn't renewed. No need to divorce - just let the marriage contract expire. 2-year minimum. Brilliant!IMO, this is a terrific idea. This takes away the primary issues when divorcing - property and custody. Imagine getting to state upfront before the marriage that, in case of divorce, both parents will EQUALLY be involved in the children's lives and decision-making process. Then, if one person wouldn't agree to that upfront, you'd know the kind of person you were marrying. EDIT: And it just hit me - this is the left that is actually sponsoring this. Wow. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 01:31 AM |
| 4 | Husband in £4m divorce 'should count himself lucky' - TelegraphFTA: "The question: what are the “reasonable needs” of a 55-year-old divorced woman with one teenage child still living at home? The answer, the appeal court ruled yesterday, is a nine-bedroom country house with 40 acres of parkland, a £1.65 million lump sum and £75,000-a-year child maintenance." 'nuff said. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/11 04:33 PM |
| 6 | Family law: Fathers and grandparents will be denied right to see children after divorce. This will make you sick.FTA: "The report says: ‘No legislation should be introduced that creates or risks creating the perception that there is a parental right to substantially shared or equal time for both parents.’ ...Mr Norgrove believes that enshrining such rights in law could slow down already lengthy and expensive custody cases... The final report flatly rejected claims by fathers’ rights groups that the current system is biased – despite figures showing that 93 per cent of custody battles are won by the mother.… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/11 02:08 PM |
| 3 | Family law judge beats own daughter for using the internet, please spread (this video will absolutely make you sick)Uh, no. That's not sarcasm. The link is there for the full context. And all family court judges are demented loons. How else do you explain taking children away from good fathers? | /r/MensRights | 02/11/11 03:26 AM |
| 6 | Family law judge beats own daughter for using the internet, please spread (this video will absolutely make you sick)Looks like YouTube is starting to remove the video purportedly for being "hate speech." Might want to start downloading this and mirroring so that they can't censor it. This one is currently up. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/11 02:05 AM |
| 12 | Family law judge beats own daughter for using the internet, please spread (this video will absolutely make you sick)Yet then there are other judges, like this family court chief judge, who want to keep good fathers out of their children's lives because, well... "You have never seen a bigger pain in the ass than the father who wants to get involved; he can be repulsive. He wants to meet the kid at three o'clock, take the kid out to dinner during the week, have the kid on his own birthday, talk to the kid on the phone every evening, go to every open school night, take the kid away for a whole weekend so they ca… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/11 01:52 AM |
| 68 | According to a new law in China, residential property is no longer to be regarded as jointly owned and divided equally in the event of a divorce. Instead, whoever paid for the apartment or house is the legal owner and gets to keep it in its entirety. Too many women were profiting from divorce.FTA: "But as house prices have accelerated, there is now a widespread perception that some women have been marrying solely because they know it will guarantee them the right to half the home's value if they divorce." | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 03:20 PM |
| 0 | Obesity Figures in More Custody Battles. Ex-Spouses Hurl Accusations in Court About Their Kids' Nutrition and ExerciseAre they really trying to make us believe that judges are using reason when they make custody decisions? What a crock. FTA: "Kenneth Henjum, a family-law practitioner in Ventura, Calif., said he recently had a male "health-nut" client who noticed that his daughter was gaining weight and petitioned the court to change the custody arrangement between him and his ex-wife. But Mr. Henjum said the court largely ignored the complaint. "The child wasn't emaciated or morbidly obese," he said. "The fathe… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/11 01:54 AM |
| 4 | The India Supreme Court has ruled that in rape cases there was no need for corroboration and conviction can be imposed on the sole statement of the victim as her testimony cannot be looked at with suspicion.Yes, because no one ever lies when it comes to rape. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 06:34 PM |
| 14 | Spouses have no right to lottery winnings - how different would this ruling have been had it been the man who won the lottery?Color me surprised. The rule of law means nothing in courts around the world. They just make shit up as they go along. Courts have zero credibility anymore. Anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant and faking reality. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 05:24 PM |
| 15 | Spouses have no right to lottery winnings - how different would this ruling have been had it been the man who won the lottery?They'll just ignore it anyway when it is a husband who wins. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 03:29 PM |
| 1 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.US | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 05:48 PM |
| 3 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.You're probably right. I just remember "the number of the beast association." Oh, how appropriate for such an evil and destructive statute. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 04:40 PM |
| 3 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.Of course I know it. Title 666 if I remember correctly. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 04:16 PM |
| 15 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.I met her at a playground. She was playing with her daughter and I was playing with mine. Yes, I found it unbelievable too. She had been referring to her "ex-" throughout the discussion, so I assumed she was divorced. When I asked her how long she had been divorced, she said that, technically, she wasn't divorced, but had been living separated from her ex- for 5 years. That's when I got into the details with her as to how that could be possible. We dated a few times after that, and one of my pri… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 04:15 PM |
| 19 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.And not only that, during divorce, even if you and your spouse make an agreement about child support, the judge can ignore it. I met a woman who was getting divorced from her husband amicably. They both agreed in advance to the division of assets, that there wouldn't be any child support, and that they would share the children equally in both time and responsibility. (What a woman!) They went into court to present their agreements to the judge. The judge told them that they didn't get to make th… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Divorce is Costly for WomenAll I could do is shake my head when reading this. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/11 01:58 PM |
| 2 | Condom-piercing leads to sex assault convictionImagine if the roles were reversed and a woman said she was taking the pill but really wasn't - think you'd have the same ruling? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/11 10:24 PM |
| 0 | "It appears the couple had been involved in a very acrimonious break-up and the mother did not allow him to see his son a lot... He was very unhappy at this arrangement and it appears that if he wasn’t allowed to have his son then no one could have him."The reason I posted it is because, regardless of how awful his action was - and it was, I can empathize with how he felt completely. You're kicked out of your child's life. There's nothing you can do. It's rubbed into your face. You have nightmares about it every night. The pain never ends. All you want is the opportunity to be a father. And they point a gun at you and say "No, you're not a father. You're a cash machine. Suck it up." For the almost 12 years that I've been dealing with this pain,… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/11 02:39 AM |
| 2 | "Need advice about my parents divorce. Scumbag father may screw honest mother out of alimony... I came to reddit with a specific question looking for legal advice. Not for a debate about the ethics of alimony."So you're suggesting that alimony is not a men's rights issue? Are you serious? Alimony is one of the key discrimination issues in men's rights. ANY situation where alimony is requested or allowed is abusive. This redditor is specifically calling a father a scumbag and a mother honest about it. What kind of nonsense is your comment? | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:29 AM |
| 1 | Supreme Court to hear father's rights caseFTA: "On August 15, 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States submitted notice to civil rights advocate Leon Koziol that his petition for a writ has been accepted for consideration under docket No. 11-185." All that means is that he submitted his petition to the USSC. It does not mean that they will hear it. It goes into the queue of thousands of other cases. There have been many fathers' rights cases over the years to make it to this stage, all to be denied certiorari without explanation fro… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/11 06:00 PM |
| 2 | Circumcision-How can people have a thought process like this and choose to make a life altering decision?To cut, or not to cut | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 09:32 PM |
| 7 | Schwarzenegger does not want to pay spousal supportWelcome to our world nightmare Arnie. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 05:04 AM |
| 13 | For anyone complaining about being "censored" on r/mensrights, r/feminisms DELETED three out of four of my comments there for no reason other than because they disagreed with them.Don't go to r/feminisms, they do not want honest debate and will delete your comments if what you say is too real for them. Uhm... perhaps that's because NOW feminists aren't honest? | /r/MensRights | 27/05/11 04:49 PM |
| 0 | Don't Give Up Fathers - I was Just Awarded Sole Physical Custody of my Two Children.And I understand the verbal abuse to the kids. I experienced it first-hand as a child. But I do not think emotional abuse should be considered because it's a slippery slope. Many would claim what the Tiger mom did to her kids is emotionally abusive. Yet her daughter is happy and even got into Harvard. Point being, there isn't any objective standard you can use when it comes to psychology - with physical violence or neglect, there is. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/11 06:18 PM |
| 4 | Don't Give Up Fathers - I was Just Awarded Sole Physical Custody of my Two Children.As for emotional harm, I can't tell you how many fathers I've spoken with who were (falsely) accused of emotionally harming their children as a cause for removing their children from them. The whole psychological aspect of divorce proceedings is a sham - it's completely based on junk science (something that I've invested hundreds and hundreds of hours studying in my case). No, the only standard that should be used in court is physical harm. If there is "clear and convincing evidence" (the legal … | /r/MensRights | 19/05/11 03:55 PM |
| -7 | Don't Give Up Fathers - I was Just Awarded Sole Physical Custody of my Two Children.I'm all for protecting children from clear and real threats of abuse, but I do not agree with sole physical custody for either party unless the parents jointly decide that's what they want. I don't celebrate it as a win when one parent - either parent - gets sole custody. Kids need both parents actively and equally involved in their lives. It would be just as wrong what the courts are doing if 84% of all custody was awarded to fathers. At the end of the day, the courts should not be allowed to a… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/11 03:32 PM |
| 3 | Holy fuck an actual man got custody of his kids. For once. As opposed to the other 500 million times. And feminists are angry because it will deprive the kids of time with her.If I had a billion upvotes at my disposal, I would give them all to you for this one. This is the KEY point of it all. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/11 03:14 AM |
| 2 | Holy fuck an actual man got custody of his kids. For once. As opposed to the other 500 million times. And feminists are angry because it will deprive the kids of time with her.Perhaps I should have submitted this to WTF? | /r/MensRights | 13/05/11 03:37 PM |
| 0 | Redistributing wealth from rich to poor via progressive income taxes continues to be pushed to "combat" income inequality. Is income inequality inherently bad, or are there circumstances where income inequality can be considered good? Is the egalitarian ideal really such a good idea?There were a few links related to feminists in the post who are fierce promoters of the income inequality farce. Additionally, the whole idea of wealth redistribution negatively affects divorced men, and often destroys their life (e.g., alimony, child support, attorneys' fees). | /r/MensRights | 11/02/11 07:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter