TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

baconfluffy Archive

View 0 posts and 95 comments by baconfluffy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Sometimes children want to sleep in their parent’s bed. Didn’t you as a child?
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 06:03 PM
4

You mean like they already do?
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 06:01 PM
1

At least coworkers don’t vomit on your carpet and piss in your bed.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 06:00 PM
-9

Glad I’m not the only one who noticed the big incel vibes.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 11:46 AM
0

“Because the risk of paying and then not getting intimate is too high” Why are you even expecting that on the first date? Don’t even date if all you want is sex. Besides that, the way you phrased that makes it seem like you think paying for a date is some sort of exchange for sex. Pretty cringe.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 01:47 AM
1

What? The line you just quoted isn’t within any of your comments here, nor the original post, so I have no clue what you’re quoting. Also, I wasn’t making a personal attack, I was pointing out how bizarre and illegible your reply was. Still makes no sense given the context.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 02:28 PM
2

What? It feels like you wrote this reply while on acid or something. It doesn’t relate to the situation at all.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 01:23 PM
3

Jealous of what? Unwanted attention from someone with their head up their ass?
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 12:53 AM
1

Start with my “apology” for “lying”? You sound like a narcissist. I didn’t lie. You just didn’t agree with me. There’s a difference, though your worldview may be too distorted to see it. Secondly, you’re wrong. There’s been many, many cases where the baby must be aborted to save the mother’s life. You’re just wrong, and it’s shocking that a person could be so close-minded to even think such a thing was true. I know a woman who is literally allergic to being pregnant. Her first child nearly kille…
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:21 PM
1

If you get diagnosed with an aggressive cancer in the first few weeks of pregnancy, you don’t always have the privilege of being able to wait months until the fetus is developed into a baby that can be safely delivered. Sometimes there aren’t ways to safely treat both the mother while protecting the baby. Your link didn’t prove anything. Also, you mentioned “honesty”, but do you know what you completed ignored in every article you posted? The word “most”. Just because many women are able to safe…
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 10:26 AM
0

What are you talking about? 90% of the things I listed fit that bill. You think a woman can’t be diagnosed with cancer during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy? “Thanks for playing”? Don’t be delusional and deny reality just because you were wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 02:45 AM
0

Any type of cancer, bleeding disorders, clotting disorders, heart or blood vessel weaknesses, autoimmune disorders that are exacerbated/actived by the pregnancy, seizure disorders, heart, lung, liver, or kidney disease, early onset preeclampsia, infection due to water breaking too early (this is one of the most common), placental abruption. Is that enough? Should I go on?
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 08:29 PM
1

There are tons of complications that can occur earlier on. Many of them of are from pre-existing conditions, often previously undetected, where continuing the pregnancy jeopardizes the mother’s life and there is no option for early delivery. I don’t know why’d you’d even think that etopic pregnancy is the only thing that’d fit this bill.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 10:08 PM
-1

Yeah, if it was a completely shared burden, I’d say fine, but in this case, they’re basically arguing that a man should get the right to decide if he’s willing to risk the mother’s life.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 10:04 PM
-4

What does a shitty woman existing have anything to do with feminism? That’s like posting a video of Chris Brown and saying “let’s see men’s rights defend this.”
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 09:41 AM
3

Would you want to have to rely on an old gay dude for your income? It’s just basic survival to want to do well in school.
/r/AntiFeminists10/04/22 11:25 PM
1

You provided a tiny study done on a single country, and then claimed it as proof that sex workers across the west are happy in their occupation. You were dishonest and deceitful.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:37 AM
1

I’m getting a double degree in bio and chem. You can’t post an incredibly insular study and claim anyone who criticizes it “doesn’t agree with data”. What if I surveyed one household in Illinois and found that 100% of men had a kink for socks? Would you accept that as applying to all men in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:14 AM
2

That study showed nothing. It had a very small sample size and the sample pool was highly unique and specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:58 PM
2

Yeah, but that’s about 5% or less of sex workers. The overall majority report that they would get out of the business if they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:05 PM
2

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:45 PM
2

That’s exactly the same situation. You just don’t want to accept that you’re a bad person for thinking such a thing in their first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 03:14 AM
2

What if a guy said he was really depressed, and my first thought was “oh, I can take advantage of his vulnerable mental situation to convince him to have sex with me in a way he wouldn’t want if he was in a healthier place”. Would that sound like a good person to you? I swear, you sound like the type that thinks that caring about other people as human beings is “simping”.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:42 AM
2

As I said, sociopathic. You’re immediate reaction to hearing someone has mental issues is “wow, I could easily take advantage of their pain for sex”, and you see no problem with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:06 AM
0

That’s all a bullshit fantasy that you built up in your head. The average woman isn’t a different breed from the average guy. We’re all just people. You need to talk to some real people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:48 AM
2

You heard of a woman with deep mental issues, and immediately thought of how fun it would be to take advantage of her for sex. I don’t know how you aren’t embarrassed of yourself saying, let alone thinking, shit like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:47 AM
-2

Men make shit up about what women like, and then when women rightly correct them, y’all say we are “gaslighting” you. I don’t know how y’all can be so confidently incorrect about shit you know nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:33 AM
–

A lot of men don’t see as as having any more “inherent value” than a living fleshlight. You might enjoy that, but women don’t. If you only care about someone for your ability to fuck them, you aren’t seeing them as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:32 AM
0

Women, in my experience, naturally see all men as people. It’s not a scale, it just is. You don’t have to be useful to be a person, the only thing that changes depending on your behavior is likability. There are nasty exceptions, but they aren’t the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:30 AM
3

They are human beings. Gosh, this sub is a cesspool of sociopaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:26 AM
–

Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:24 AM
–

Dude, that’s abusive. Isolating someone is a clear sign of manipulative abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:23 AM
–

Natural selection is the reason love exists. We wouldn’t be so obsessed with each other if it didn’t give an advantage in survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:21 AM
1

OP, I’m late to the party, but don’t listen to this circle jerk of men making shit up about things they don’t even understand. I’m a woman. Each woman is into different things. I personally am not into dominant, “powerful” men. Every single guy I’ve seriously liked has been kind and easy going. They are people that laugh easily and make me feel comfortable being around them. Attractiveness is definitely part of it, but none of the guys I’ve seriously liked have been 10/10 “chads” or whatever. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:55 AM
2

If you want a wife as a comfort object and a sex toy. - perfectly fine If you only want a wife as a comfort object and a sex toy. - OMG YOU MISOGYNISTIC CREEP, HOW DARE YOU, REEEEEEEEEE!!!! If you think the first sentence is fine, and you make fun of others for having a problem with the second sentence, then no, you aren't showing that a few words drastically change the meaning of a sentence. You were trying to say that the difference in the sentences were simply semantics before. Backpedaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:18 PM
3

Right, because women don't want husbands that they see as a 'comfort' and are sexually attracted to? Which you yourself admitted was done on purpose. ​ ---------------I'd realize they don't see me as a person I always find it funny that BPs jump to this immediate retort anytime the idea that men might be sexually attracted to women. Sexually attracted to women =/= seeing a person as an object, but you tried to act like that's what I was saying. ​ If you want a wife as a comfort object and a sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 02:45 PM
3

You have done it multiple times in this conversation in order to strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 02:11 PM
3

You gals take something otherwise innocuous, slip in one or two extra words to make is sound egregious, and then get all angsty over it. It's almost like different words make different sentences with different meanings. Note the difference between "I like cats" and "I like killing cats". There's only one extra word there. ​ Or like a walking ATM... Yes, exactly. Treating a spouse like any kind of object is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 01:54 PM
2

Right, because women don't want husbands that they see as a 'comfort' and are sexually attracted to? Yes, but that's completely different from what we have been talking about. Nice strawman there. The issue under discussion is viewing your partner as an object that gives you sex and comfort, like some sort of snack machine, rather than a living breathing person. If your main purpose in getting married is just comfort and sex, you can get that from a thousand other ways. No need to pretend to lov…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 12:38 PM
2

If you want a wife as a comfort object and a sex toy. - perfectly fine Still an f'ed up statement. The fact you don't see that means you have some serious problem to work through.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 11:49 AM
3

If you only want a wife as a comfort object and a sex toy, then you only want an object. You are delusional if you can't see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 12:56 AM
2

The fact that you can't tell the difference between those two sentences kinda proves my point. You view women as objects to be used, rather than people. Those two sentences have completely different meanings in regard to how one views their wife. Women use 'objectification' like they use 'entitlement'. It's to denigrate and attack men for no good reason. You can't tell when women are being objectified because you only see women as objects, evident from your response to my previous statement. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 12:16 AM
1

Most women use other social media. Any women who would rather spend time here over Twitter/Insta/Facebook is already an outlier. This was your original statement that I was criticizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:54 AM
2

1 in 8 women using reddit (in the US) doesn't constitute being an outlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:31 AM
2

Any women who would rather spend time here over Twitter/Insta/Facebook is already an outlier. 23% of US adult men us reddit, and 12% of US adult women use reddit, so that's about 20 million female users from the US alone. Hardly outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:22 AM
1

I have noticed this more with women who say they are into horses and other strong male animals. ??? Horses can be female, though??
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:13 AM
1

Just because a guy is gay doesn't mean he is feminine. That wasn't my point whatsoever. My point were that they were gay men who were also feminine. I didn't mean to tie those things together, though I see why you read it that way, as many people do tie those things together. ​ Extremely feminine men are not boisterous, outgoing, confident or loud. Would you describe James Charles as feminine or masculine, then? What about Jeffrey Star? For women, how about Marylin Monroe? She lived a very loud …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:49 AM
1

Boldness isn't not feminine, though. The most confident, loud, outgoing, boisterous men I know are all extremely feminine gay men, and I think of it as part of their femininity. I think everyone has a different definition of femininity/masculinity though, so to each their own. A while back I read a study done on the preferences of nations that didn't have media systems. It found that in places without the influence of media, both men and women preferred faces that were more androgynous. Preferen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:14 AM
2

Women are expected to subsidize men through labor at home, though. If women weren't burdened with the expectation of being the primary caregiver of the kids, they would make more money. Unmarried, childless women actually make more money than the average man. ​ Don't act like it's some big sacrifice. My point is that, if you think woman should just deal with being expected to sacrifice their careers, then don't be mad when women end up making less money as a consequence of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 02:51 AM
3

We don't want to be objectified for anything. We want our partners to actually care about us as people. There's a big difference between "I'm attracted to my wife and want to be with her" and "My wife is just good for sex and comfort for me."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 02:45 AM
1

I've seem hundreds upon hundreds of negative comments about women's appearances by men on social media. Probably thousands at this point. Also, the majority of people in charge of media outlets are men, so you can't say that it's just women doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 02:42 AM
2

There is a decreased economic output even if both parents work. Women are often expected to leave work early, call off, or work less hours to accommodate the children's schedules/sicknesses. Even if this responsibility was evenly shared, it would result in reduced economic output from both parents, just to a lesser degree. Also, here's some sources. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227352594_Gender_and_Public_Attitudes_toward_Corruption_and_Tax_Evasion https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitst…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 02:37 AM
1

It can be appearance or personality, but a good frame of reference for personality would be someone like Chris Fleming, or to a lesser extent, John Mulaney. As far as appearance, more feminine "pretty" looks are more common in East Asian media, especially South Korea. Basically, soft hair, not too much body hair, clean shaven, and facial features that could be considered pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 02:21 AM
2

If women weren't being pressured to sacrifice their careers to take care of their kids (SAHMs, time off when kids get sick or have events, expected to work less to take care of kids), then they would make more money. And, men would make less money because they would have to start sacrificing their careers to fulfill these duties.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:20 PM
–

I know men that are "pretty" even into their 30's. There's plenty of feminine looking men that are adults. It's just that Western media doesn't push that look, so it's not seen in mainstream media. East Asian media pushes that look more, so you see tons of men in their 30's and 40's that fit my previous description (such as Rain, or the more well known group BTS). My attraction to pretty men is sexual. I have a hard time being sexually attracted to burly men with lots of hair. It's simply not my…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:17 PM
1

I said that I don't believe that it's not an issue, and also I said earlier that I do think it's an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 03:10 PM
1

-----"I'm not saying that the stigma isn't an issue" "What I AM saying is that the stigma IS an issue." These two statements are not contradictory. I never said that there wasn't stigma. My whole point is that you have a choice regardless of that stigma.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 03:04 PM
2

Even if women were replaced with men, tax revenue would drop significantly. Women take hits to their career to take care of their children, since men view their careers as more important, even if they make less money, and expect women to sacrifice their careers (if I can find the study, I'll link it. It's been a while since I read it, and I can't remember where I accessed it). Without women doing that, men would have to shoulder that responsibility, leading to a decrease in their output and ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 03:00 PM
1

Women don't benefit from men pretending to love them just to get their parents off their backs. Also, you're acting as if this isn't something I have to deal with. If I don't marry, I'll have to deal with the same crap. I just understand that I have a choice in the matter. A lot of people actually don't have that choice, even today. They will be exiled or killed if they don't marry. Compared to that, I can get over nagging and my parents being disappointed. I'm not saying that the stigma isn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:36 PM
2

That article says nothing about women being a net negative on taxes. And, after looking, I could find nothing else that supports your claims. I'm also from the US, where there is much less social welfare compared to the UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:28 PM
6

I'm an adult woman who likes kpop. I know many, many others. Most adults who like kpop don't constantly talk about it to acquaintances. Jason Momoa seems like a likeable guy and acts well, but I'm not particularly attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:20 PM
1

If someone is like "hey, everybody is drinking, you should too!" Are they forcing you to drink? Are they making it so that you are not capable of not drinking? No, you still have culpability for your actions. They might be pressuring you to an extent, but you still have a choice. I'm not trying to say that outside forces don't affect us at all, but it's disingenuous to say that in today's culture, you are forced to get married, at least for most of the West. 100 years ago, you could make the cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:13 PM
1

There being stigma around not marrying doesn't mean that you are forced to marry. There's pressure to marry, but that's not the same as being "forced". Not unless not complying would risk your access to food, water, shelter, and/or safety. If I don't find someone I want to marry, I'll just deal with the backlash. I have no issue making that decision if need be, because 1) I value my happiness over societal expectations and 2) I think it's morally wrong to marry if you don't actually want to marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 01:50 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 01:21 PM
2

I meant bottom as in sexual position. Also, women don't have magical power to change men. Most people who are unmotivated and unambitious won't change just because they fall in love with someone. Also, how would that first scenario benefit the woman? Money? She could get that by becoming a software engineer herself. Then she could have the money and choose to be with someone she actually loves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 12:47 PM
2

Which is fine, but such a model will not work without oppressing or tricking a group of women to mate with men they do no want (the reverse is true). I don't understand what you mean here. Who would be oppressed? ​ I would say many people overestimate there value and forcing them to mate with someone who is in there league would result in them having a better quality of life. Do you think being forced to marry a man and bottom for him would improve your quality of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 12:08 PM
0

Well, there's not really any other way to study such a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:57 AM
1

Men also do less to take care of their health, including being less likely to seek out medical care and more likely to drink regularly and smoke.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:33 AM
1

If you view marriage as imprisonment, don't get married. Nobody's forcing you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:30 AM
0

According to most studies, the majority of people don't cheat. And even then, men are more likely to cheat. So, I'm not sure what your point is here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:44 AM
2

Depends on how many kids and their ages. It could easily surpass those hours if you have very young children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:24 AM
1

I don't care for hookups, so I'm not the one to ask about that. If I did hookups, I'd probably just go for whoever was the most attractive and seemed trustworthy, since I'd never see them again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:23 AM
2

That's why having conversations about what you want from the relationship early on is important. If someone said that to me, I'd realize they don't see me as a person and jump ship. Better for that to happen earlier rather than later.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:44 AM
2

Women make up half the workforce, and supply taxes as well. Taxpayer's money is from women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:34 AM
2

It's because women are fine with being alone. If I choose to marry someone, it's because I want that specific person in my life. If marrying someone made my life quality go down, I'd rather stay single.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:26 AM
1

Women in media are torn apart if their bodies aren't perfect. We assume that if our aren't bodies aren't perfect, we'll get torn apart the same away.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:19 AM
3

Even people who experience no sexual or romantic attraction can still be self conscious about their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:11 AM
1

How many married guys do you know that actual meet that description? Most guys are able to get girlfriends without looking like a body builder.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:10 AM
2

Women caring about their appearance in the past is nothing like how it is now. Men cared about their appearance as well in the past. Nowadays, you have young people starving themselves to the point that their heart fails because they hate their body. The way media influences women's criticisms of themselves has been documented.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:07 AM
1

I don't care about status, but I want somebody who cares about their life. I care about mine, and I don't want to be in a relationship with someone I have to baby. You could be a starving artist, but if you are passionate about your work and level-headed, that's fine with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:01 AM
4

When was the last time you checked, the 1950s? Women make up just about half of the workforce. There's no inherent reason that men must make more money than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:59 AM
–

I like feminine guys and pretty boys, and I'm about to graduate from college.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:52 AM
–

Masculine men are just less attractive to me. I prefer pretty boys, I have my whole life. I don't know why that's so hard for people to accept. Different people have different preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:50 AM
4

kpop singers have ridiculously huge fanbases of adult women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:45 AM
2

I'm a grown woman, I still think the guys from BTS (kpop group) represent peak attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:44 AM
–

If you want to date somebody that looks like your dad, that's fine for you, but don't put that on all women. I'm in my 20's, and I still prefer men with no body hair, fluffy hair, and pretty faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:42 AM
6

Woman here. Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:33 AM
10

Woman here. I don't view myself as intrinsically tied to a man. Pursuing a career isn't a way to be independent from men, it's just a way to take care of myself. I would also like to help people in the process, be mentally stimulated, and feel like my life has meaning, which is why I want to go into medicinal chemistry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:32 AM
–

Most women in the US work full-time these days, so it's not like men are the only ones who experience such a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:26 AM
–

Why would the boyfriend inherently make more money than his girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:22 AM
2

Those hours increase a whole lot if you have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:20 AM
4

I'm currently in college, about to finish, and I imagine I'll do either a master's, PhD, or both. Ideal would be my own age who works similar hours. 5 years older or younger is fine, but not preferred. I would never seek out a much older career guy. Honestly, a guy who works less would be better, since it'd be easier to have time together. Tbh, I like feminine guys, though I don't think someone who takes care of others is inherently feminine. If I'm making enough money that it makes sense to do …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:15 AM
1

Yeah, I don't think grouping men together as a collective is right either.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 05:15 PM
2

As somebody else said, each woman is their own person. Not a collective. I don't know why I should be expected to be on the same page about my sexuality with random women on the internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 04:48 PM
-1

Why should I attack other women doing what they want? Other women posting sexual images isn't an invitation for men to sexualize me living my day-to-day life. Women aren't a collective, each person is allowed to have their own agency.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 04:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter