TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

balifor Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by balifor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

its pretty evident you are an idiot if you cant understand the difference between a sexist law/policy and a difference in outcome in divorce proceedings. Wow, just stunning. Yes, they are not NECESSARILY linked, but don't you think if there was a "sexist law/policy" it would create a "difference in outcome in divorce proceedings" Have a look at the F-4-J fact sheet if you really think there is no legal discrimination you just sound like a crazy conspiracy theorist "the system is a giant conspira…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:30 PM
1

It's nice that you think we live in a perfectly fair world. It's nice that you think that governments just implement the directives It's nice that you think that EU directive 2004/113 removes all gender discrimination It's nice, but naive. EU directive 2004/113 actually only has to do with: implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services So that doesn't include things like equal parenting / equal right to choose parenthood / e…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:08 PM
1

I heard the speaker in the video say that as a MGTOW he was a feminist as well It's possible, it really depends on what they mean by "feminist". I get the impression they mean "women should have equal rights" type of feminism. Which is not mutually exclusive with MGTOW. Some might argue that MGTOW could be described as feminism for men. They recognise that they don't have equal rights, but they've no interest in fighting for them, they see it as a lost cause. So it's more of a reactionary approa…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:52 PM
1

yes, but as a general rule, the courts and police don't go around murdering people.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:35 PM
1

Yet they still happen
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:33 PM
6

Whilst I appreciate the point you're making, and I fully agree with the egalitarian perspective you're coming from. I really REALLY don't see what it achieves? One thing I've noticed recently is that women's rights included the right to wear pants Men can wear skirts, if they so choose. In fact there's a nation just a little north of mine that has a skirt as the national signature dress of a man (Scotland) But, frankly, who gives a fuck? I would gladly accept wearing a skirt if it meant that I h…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:52 AM
6

At what point does an attitude like that actually end up with the person in a padded cell? It was them pesky cis white men - gettum scoob!
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:09 PM
2

Maybe if below average people looked at history a little bit before joining the conversation and pontificating on whats 'for retards' they wouldn't show themselves up as much. It might be a different sign, but most people don't have a reverse question mark easily available to them on their keyboards. So they improvise!
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:28 PM
2

I am trying not to antagonise him anymore than necessary. Oh, then call him a 'white cisgendered shitlord' - at least being super privileged makes up for being called a shitlord Edit: /s for clarity
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:38 AM
2

I would assume that people realized this a while ago and they communicate with different words and phrases in writing and in live speech. Like using /s?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:34 AM
5

Nope Its damn hard to work out what a stranger on the internet means when 60% of what they're saying (vocal tone/pitch, body language etc) doesn't translate to text.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:27 AM
8

Totally agreed. Yes, there are some angry people here, but in the face of the current legal system, I am constantly amazed there isn't more anger and bile. Acknowledging that there are problems that affect men, is not misogynistic. Gathering to discuss what those problems are and what causes them, is not misogynistic . Coming to the conclusion that a lot of the legal unfairness is caused by an ideology and expressing dislike of that ideology, is not misogynistic. Feminism != Women Anti-feminism …
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:20 AM
9

If you want an example of actual feminist KKK members, take a look at some of the founders: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/10/the-great-schism/246640/
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:13 AM
6

Cisgendered shitlord*
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:08 AM
2

Hmm, gender is just one of the categories available to compete under in the oppression olympics. Its the most common one yes, but don't forget about race and dis/ability. The "nutjobs" just feel oppressed, often by logic, factual accuracy, or common sense. There's definitely an argument that if feminism didn't exist, they'd find some other platform to use to express their discontent. The only reason feminism picked them up was "intersectionality", It didn't take into account that some of the wac…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:29 AM
1

TIL The use of he is uncommon though, and especially likely to cause confusion in this context. Disclaimer: The closest I've come to a lawyer is a housemate who occasionally rants about the oddities of law (law student).
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:31 PM
1

Fair point well made, how about just 'penetration'?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:52 PM
4

Hmm, the issue you have there is that you haven't defined what a sexual act is. If you look previously, its a constrained list of defined acts. (The law is a REAL bitch when it comes to this sort of thing) I would suggest amending it to: The act of rape is defined as: the penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth of a person, by a person (the rapist) where the other party (the victim) does not consent to penetration, and (the rapist) does not reasonably believe that (the victim) consents. Edit: r…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:31 PM
8

This is what the MHRM means to me: "political, social, and economic equality between the sexes." The Men's Rights movement spawned because the dictionary definition of feminism isn't what is practiced in the media or the law. If you want to argue that feminism is merely the female focused facet of egalitarianism, that's fine and the vast majority (There are ideologues of every stripe) of MRAs would support it wholeheartedly. You could in fact call MRAs feminists, of the: "political, social, and …
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:01 PM
8

It might have something to do with her doing something shitty and then blaming him for it. It might be that people who have been affected by people with attitudes like this have a very negative reaction when they see it again. Just a thought
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:21 PM
8

It's pretty hard to ignore that there's an earnings gap. I don't think I've heard people deny that it exists. It's what the earnings gap means thats under debate. On the one side, you hear feminists claim that its proof that women are being paid less per hour for the same work. And on the other you have the contention that the earnings gap is proof that women are coddled and entitled, on average, for every unit of work a man does a woman does .75. Now if you take into account who SPENDS the most…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:58 PM
42

AHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAH - oh Joss, I used to really love you. You were the creator of the definitive shows of my childhood. Then you started uncritically praising Queen Sarkeesian to air your feminist credentials. You allied with the dragon, despite the apparent insanity... and it bit you. I would love to be sympathetic, I really would, but I can't. Every time I see a white knight get eaten by the beast they're defending, it gives me a lovely warm fuzzy feeling. So thanks for that Joss, I'd go…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:30 AM
-2

This
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:23 AM
4

Monk. Plus, why would you want her still having a hand in your life?
/r/MGTOW27/04/15 07:59 PM
1

Would you ever listen to anything a rad-fem has to say? Is that because they're just not credible as a group? Perhaps people just develop the same opinion about any group of people who bullshit, tea party anyone?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:41 PM
1

A lot of people here think that Patriarchy theory, Rape Culture and Gaze theory are all the same sort of idiotic sexist assertions that cause these problems in the first place. Other than that, agreed
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:39 PM
0

from the article you linked: and there is at least some evidence that plenty of feminists do publicly criticize her views, such as the second interviewer that I cited, who even identifies as a radical feminist also. Not even all rad fems agree with her. She is the fringe of the fringe. I.E Not Mainstream. The article is just talking about cross-over between rad-fem and mainstream, and there is some. Like patriarchy and rape culture, but please, BE HONEST, with yourself and those you talk to abou…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:13 AM
1

I agree it's becoming more common, but Rad-fem != feminism, and I agree its disgusting that its not challenged. But Feminism is a wide range of opinions held by a wide range of people. To say that the 10% idea is more than an edge view amongst feminists, is a little disingenuous. I understand the anger at the double standard, I really do. That mainstream feminists don't wail on these people for being both sexist and moronic is damaging to the entire movement. On the other hand, saying that these…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:56 AM
-2

It's feminism, remember that "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race" is one of its central tenets. Really? If we want to be taken seriously, we should perhaps not spout bollocks like the above is a "central tenet" of feminism. Its the view of weird ass fuckin misandrists and others permanently affected with cognitive dissonance, akin to those in AMR, not the mainstream of feminism. Mainstream feminism still has a lot of fucked up stuff (pa…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter