TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bambooskeleton Archive

View 1 posts and 289 comments by bambooskeleton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Discussionbambooskeleton/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I know she's a minor but how dumb can people be? What combination of drugs results in this behavior? Not only the inability to understand a condom but also no understanding of the consequences of not getting an abortion or the idea of just throwing it out the window? This is my species?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:56 PM
-2

/im14andthisisdeep
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:30 PM
1

this is a nice one for imagining the reaction with the genders reversed
/r/MensRights10/12/18 09:38 PM
4

its not useless, but its not perfect. In addition to location you can look at information transmitted to add to the theory that he was at home and using his phone from time to time.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 10:12 PM
23

A selfie didn't save him. Even without an alibi he could have used cell location data to put him at home. Not as convincing as the selfie with other people but still pretty good. the Bell County Attorney’s Office will ultimately determine if charges will be made against Precopia’s accuser for making a false statement. KVUE reported Tuesday that Precopia’s accuser has not been charged with a crime. Wtf is there to determine? It's deliberate abuse of the justice system. It's like picking up the ha…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:14 PM
1

im triggered!
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:39 PM
3

I agree with you but the double standard is the real issue. On top of that it is extremely easy for females to claim to have been victimized even when they weren't and difficult for males even when they were.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:32 PM
2

that's why we call it statutory rape though
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:30 PM
4

If we attack it, history will be different!
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:05 PM
5

Holy thot
/r/MensRights17/10/18 05:58 PM
1

I'm not on board with this one. Dude could have taken steps to block communication. Maybe this is consistent with other laws related to instigating violence but even those I don't really support.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 05:58 PM
2

I have had offers on occasion but its a small percentage of women I have interacted with so not a significant amount. I'm saying that I am average at best and that's not a problem. People will be nice but if you've had friends who are conventionally attractive it's very easy to see how often women flirt with them in daily life, which virtually never happens to someone like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/18 05:34 PM
5

What are you talking about? I can determine mine by looking in a mirror and comparing myself to the cliche dudes that have a very high average rating. I look nothing like the almost-universally attractive celebrities. I know where I stand. And even if not, people treat you differently based on how you look, you don't have to have sex with them for that to be true. Ever been on a dating site or anything? Try messaging women as an average to below average guy. I can plan on a 1/10 or so response r…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/18 05:26 PM
3

Also is it not a crime just to waste the resources of the justice system like this? I mean it's very similar to calling the fire department for a fire that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:01 PM
1

They're not all that comparable but this is far from being "privilege".
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:47 PM
24

This internet jargon mixed with armchair internet psychology is so cringy. I don't understand how people can make these extravagant claims about this shit none of it is taken serious outside of the internet. The internet has just become it's own jibbering echo chamber where everybody breaths into the fantasy they find most appealing.
/r/ExRedPill13/08/18 06:25 PM
33

"You define yourself. If you let other people define you, that's a mistake" I love you Judy.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:11 PM
4

6 years for 3.5 million
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:31 PM
4

What is it with these people and constant hyperbole?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 10:40 PM
1

Ok but I'm working from the assumption that there is no evidence and that any rational person would not think it happened. I'm not strictly talking about the court system. I'm talking about what makes sense. There's no way to know it's defamation. That's why the names of the accused should be secret until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:42 PM
1

So what I'm saying is that we have no way of knowing what's true here. Can we know it's defamation? Maybe something did happen between them. The accusations would still be baseless but we don't know the intent was defamation if she could be telling the truth.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:45 PM
1

I'm no legal expert but I assume it has to be false to be defamation. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:42 PM
1

I understand why the law suit would be an option for him, but this isn't ideal. He can't prove it was malicious because nobody knows what happened. There's no evidence of rape, so it shouldn't have gone anywhere in the first place. But asserting something without evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen, it just means nobody should believe it happened. Do we know she did it to ruin his reputation? Seems likely but not beyond a reasonable doubt. I wish rape was treated like the majority of crimes. …
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:23 PM
49

This one is pretty blatant.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:23 PM
3

This is laughable. It's a terrible idea, socially, financially, and emotionally to have children with more than one mother. I could get the relevant research for all of this, but we all know it's there. Yes if you were a king with 10000x the wealth of a peasant and women were (generally) given no choice in the matter, you could certainly pull this off. I just keep seeing these sorts of posts, and they always have two components. Some sort of dogma about biological imperative, and a lot of armcha…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:46 PM
2

It was so stupid to begin with for many reasons. Why should we care about the personal lives of celebrities? We have this delusion that if you buy someone's art you are voting for choices in their personal life. I shouldn't have to point out why this is so silly. Even if everything she sad had been true, she gave us no reason to believe it. It was some "he said she said" bullshit. She even ended her post saying she had video to support some of it. Ok so you just want us to take your word for it …
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:09 PM
3

Yeah and this expectation that you can predict so much just based on someone's gender. Having common interests and similar personalities is going to be the number one factor and that's not something you can know from a distance. Nevermind the silly idea that women "demand" marriage lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 09:30 PM
3

Yeah this shit is so annoying. Men just take the consequences. Women are on some emotional journey and can't be blamed for anything because they are just subject to the winds. It's treating women like children.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:04 PM
-9

dat small sample size
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:52 PM
3

The sweeping generalizations, just in the title alone, my god.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 03:50 PM
10

Exactly. Then you're oppressing her!!!
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:07 AM
1

It's totally reasonable and not an excuse. Easy to not feel "the spark" if you don't find the other person attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 06:29 PM
3

wat
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:04 PM
3

god damn she is retarded
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:45 AM
1

Yo, that's gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 12:05 AM
5

This reads like some kind of bio-religiosity. Your DNA is your essence? Some unique, intangible part of you is vitally important after you die? You fail in the eyes of your biology? If I die without children, then I am a failure. Yeah the genes fail to continue on, but again what is the significance of that? You talk about it like it is obvious, but I don't see any reason why I should be concerned with what happens to my genes. If if I were concerned there are plenty of reasons that it's still n…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 04:53 PM
1

You can absolutely prove randomness, but it doesn't matter right now. As I have said, I'm not denying that lots of people want to reproduce. I'm saying that it's not something to care about. I'm saying there's no good argument for us worrying about genes being passed on. We have plenty of people. I have not mentioned nihilism (and a nihilist wouldn't care about the world being doomed), I'm just saying there are lots of other things to value that don't involve reproduction or genes. I'm just poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:14 AM
1

Nothing to see here, folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:08 AM
3

I know that most people and almost all animals want to reproduce. But that's not giving me a reason to do it. That's an "appeal to nature" fallacy. I'm not debating if it's my freedom to not care about reproducing. I'm asking what reason there is to care about it, and you seem to just be saying that it's how nature tends to work and therefor it should be our goal. We're already way beyond nature. Nature had us smashing our heads in with rocks and dying of the plague.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:54 PM
1

It is entirely random on a cosmic scale. Evolution happens as things change to suit an environment. The environment is about as random as things get. The history of life on earth was totally random. Had something heavy struck the earth 3 billion years ago and wiped out half the microbes, our planet could be totally alien compared to what it is today. We can't talk about the actual creation (pre big-bang) but everything that has happened since that time has been a result of things smashing togeth…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:49 PM
1

The process as a whole is random. I actually mentioned and even used the word "selection". I can bold it in the previous reply too if that helps. Yes there are different selection pressures, but the pressures themselves are random. We happen to have different sexes in our species, that was random. There's no reason we should have to trade genes that way. The whole machine of nature is a random process, the environment that we adapt too (including sexual selection) was created randomly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:23 PM
6

Ok but again, why should we be so worried about certain genes continuing on? Why care any more about biology than geology? I'm not saying we shouldn't care about people surviving. I'm saying for an individual person, like me, why should I care any more about the history and future of my genes than I do about a rock on my sidewalk?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:20 PM
4

Yeah I know about reproduction. But evolution and the spread of genes is a totally random process. It's like shifting for gold. Some of the genes go on if they match the selection pressure, what does that have to do with how a person lives their life? Second, why should any individual care about this process? Even if I admitted that it mattered in some way for my genes to continue, they're going to stop eventually. What's the goal? I know there are isolated cases of birth issues. I'm not debatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:16 PM
7

Right, but what is the significance of that? What sign is there of me being upset here? What does that have to do with anything? MAYBE I WOULD SEEM UPSET IF I HAD MORE CAPITAL LETTERS LIKE YOU?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:09 PM
7

I just don't see what the significance of not reproducing is. There is no crisis of births. The opposite, if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 10:51 PM
7

They are worthless human beings in a biological sense, not a moral sense perhaps. But it's not a huge leap of logic to conclude they're entirely worthless. lol what. This is one of the most ridiculous things I have read here. Worthless to who? Themselves? No. Their family/friends/spouses? No. The economy? No. Your metric for worth is if the death of someone would end the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 10:44 PM
1

opinion
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:51 PM
0

I'm so fucking sick of this eric andre meme it's ruining the show for me.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 10:36 PM
2

i didn't say stop
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 08:18 PM
3

say it again but slower you succubus
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 07:44 PM
2

oh then what are you wearing?thisworkseverytime
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 07:21 PM
4

this is cruel do not dangle meat in front of the animals at the zoo
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 07:00 PM
1

I can't take it seriously when someone tells me in so many words, to read between the lines. Once I see through the conspiracy it supports what you believe. People always do this when the evidence doesn't support what they think. They distort it and explain how it actually does. "Oh of course NASA would show the pieces of the Apollo 11 because they had a budget for props when they faked the moon landing". Obviously the chances of a fake moon landing aren't the same as LCK's manager influencing w…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:57 PM
1

I think this is one of the most serious social issues right now and it's virtually never talked about. Not only is it feasible (but not confirmed) that more men are the victims of rape than women in the usa but we seem to treat everyone in prison as though they haven't already been sentenced for their crimes and that whatever else happens to them doesn't matter. All these nuances of pronouns and white privileges etc are extra stupid in the face of tens or hundreds of thousands of people being ra…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:33 PM
1

As I have said elsewhere in the thread, I do not think he broke the law. I think people would be less likely to work with him so his career would suffer. You seem to be dismissing his own admissions because you assume they weren't written honestly, but there's no reason to think that's factual. People get dodgy when they are accused of things but they rarely fully admit to all accusations. This is nearly the reverse of typical behavior.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:02 PM
2

He broke no law and clearly never deserved the shit he's faced. You cant have it both ways and smear him as mentally imbalanced for the things he did then also use his own value judgements to damn him. I did neither.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 11:33 PM
4

If manipulation isn't a fair summary of what I quoted then I don't think there is any productive conversation here. I can see all the tracings of an echo chamber here where everyone is so defensive and has their finger on the trigger to write me off as some kind of blind feminist. Manipulating people is not really against the law. That's the whole business of sales. What I said was that he wouldn't be a person people (mostly women I assume) would want to work with as much anymore. If that is not…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:10 PM
-1

Oh boy.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:31 PM
1

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/10/arts/television/louis-ck-statement.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article what I learned later in life, too late, is that when you have power over another person, asking them to look at your dick isn’t a question. It’s a predicament for them. The power I had over these women is that they admired me. And I wielded that power irresponsibly. I also took advantage of th…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:08 PM
5

In his own writing he said he manipulated women into this by his success in the business and unfairly pressured them. I agree that people should simply say no to weird stuff like this but I cannot expect anyone to be as willing to work with him after that admission.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:49 PM
-4

yeah exactly. If he does return it won't be the same. Nobody will really see him too far from a straight up racist. It has already had a devastating career impact. It should, but it's not the same thing as Harvey Weinstein at all.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:18 PM
1

Well someone has to take the downvotes here. These things are stupid for men or women. I don't need someone on twitter or in the media to tell me it's ok to be less attractive. There are more important things in life to care about. Evaluating yourself based on your looks entirely is just dumb. Yeah, I was given genes that make me ugly. Who cares? what a boring thing to think about. And the people who say this stuff seem to want to think that it is always ok, that you are still attractive. I'm so…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:15 PM
2

no you!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 07:25 PM
1

I'm sure, obviously. But I'm pretty tired of people showing off their views of the most obvious ethical shit ever.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 03:44 PM
1

i might feel the same way if i didnt look like a cross between a dead moose and a bag of trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 04:19 AM
3

It's a bizarre fixation. It's like if I went to a movie with someone and they wanted to count the number of times the characters say the word "the". Wtf why? Also for me, things like the make me part of this person's plan of some sort, I am not an individual but a cog in their imaginary sexual scorecard so I feel like I am being used. I don't do casual sex but since that is using people for sex then I don't see why someone would care about this, other than the fact that it might worry them about…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 10:47 PM
2

What the fuck? No. Anyone who is measuring something like that is not someone I want to have sex with. Knowing this was an interest of theirs would be a relationship ender.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 10:42 PM
1

I'm not talking about an AI partner though. That's different. If it is actual AI it would be indistinguishable to a real partner. I mentioned this, and I said I don't think it will matter because by that time it will be nothing like our world is today. I also did not mention the relationship being miserable and there's no reason to think it would be that way. I am talking about the desires people have. I am saying that the OP is silly because nobody desires a sexbot in the same way they desire a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 10:47 PM
1

im talking about the desire. i dont see any reason why the group would get bigger if the desire is shared and being that there are equal numbers of men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 09:02 PM
1

Do you really think that given the option, the vast majority of people wouldn't opt for a fantastic, lifelong romantic partner if the other option where a sex doll
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 08:11 PM
3

I thought this was a parody. On this sub I can never be sure. The broad generalizations and armchair psychology are making my head spin. Why are we hypothesizing like aliens? Is the reason you approach a woman is just for her to validate you? For her to tell you that you're selectable? Come on. How can anyone take this seriously? And if someone is doing that, male or female, grow up. Are we really giving reasons why sex dolls won't "replace" real relationships? Again, how can this be serious? Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 07:37 PM
2

I don't even know how I saw that clip from the awful show but my first thought was the crazy outrage we'd have if the genders were reversed. A dudes career would be over.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:44 PM
2

what the fuck. This is enraging. 48 weekends in a community corrections center for the sexual assault of a 15-year-old boy. And jesus christ, how is any of that an excuse. I mean something is obviously wrong if you rape someone but the fact that your insecurity, frustration--anything short of a gun to your head--was a "reason" for sexual assault should put you away.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 09:45 PM
1

suffering from low self esteem excuse or she was going through a rough time excuse Has this actually come up in court?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 09:00 PM
1

In a world without other people why would you dress a certain way or color your hair? Of course it's for attention.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:04 PM
2

I'm talking generically about the differences in punishment by gender but yeah I see your point.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:39 PM
33

Don't worry the court will say she was frustrated and angry and took it out poorly or something. Couple months of sunny community service and she'll be good to go.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:30 PM
1

Women are under-represented in these fields!
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:40 PM
0

So that's not her in the pic, though?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:08 PM
1

ok thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 06:05 PM
1

I'm definitely no proponent of casual sex and "hookup culture" but if "feminism" is what's causing these chicks to do it I don't really care. Can't fix stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 02:35 AM
2

problematic I just can't take anyone seriously who says this. It just seems to me "I don't like it but I don't have an actual argument for why it shouldn't be done".
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:10 PM
1

:|
/r/MensRights17/01/18 05:20 PM
4

Now I don't feel like correcting it.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:37 AM
16

I think that's the root of the problem, that you would even have to teach someone to say no to something they don't want.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:07 AM
1

I agree that it's stupid but that's the game you play when you are an entertainer. For some reason, people judge you on your personal life as much as they do on your actual art. All that can be done about it is to tell this current wave of feminists that it doesn't make any sense to behave this way, but we all know where that goes.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:16 PM
1

But Ansari isn't being accused of a crime. He's being accused of being misogynist...or something. I agree there is a big asymmetry in the legal system but I don't think it's incredibly difficult to know if a woman is going to act this way. This cult of oppression is pretty infectious in 20-something females but there are still plenty who don't see it that way.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:37 PM
-4

I'm talking about my own experience and I'm not generalizing to the whole population. The way I took your statement was that by saying "someone you hardly know" you are essentially picking them out at random. My point is to be more selective (which is why I am complaining about the process involving the very conservative) but I'm not going to tell you how to live your life.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:51 PM
-9

This is pretty ridiculous generalizing. It's not like all women are this retarded and walk around with victim complexes. It's popular now, I think because in today's world there's really obvious cause that you can plaster on campus posters, but I think it will slow down. I just wish that in the meantime I didn't have to look to hyper-conservative circles to find a female who doesn't want to witch hunt.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:28 PM
35

He clearly wasn't interested in a second date. He just wanted to fuck and there's nothing wrong with that. not really since he was texting her after that about having a good time or whatever. I don't think he made any mistake other than perhaps being insensitive (by her account). Not hard to see how he would be confused when she sucks his dick in his apartment. Talk about a non-verbal cue amirite? But seriously why aren't women (and all people) expected to simply say "no" or "this is too much fo…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:25 PM
5

very, very dangerous. jesus christ what happened to journalism? This reads like a middle school english class. Also why is this even a story? Girl says she thinks a dude was a douche bag on a date... k.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:22 PM
12

don't remind me of the cringe age of selfies with underlined marker text. Virtue signalling to the max.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:27 PM
-3

thank you for the insightful analysis
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:40 PM
3

Lol. This sub is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 12:49 AM
1

Well he got elected after the pussy grabbing thing, bragging about checking out girls at the pageant and like two dozen accusations from different women. So uh no, it's not going to do anything.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:42 PM
2

I don't understand the relevance of what you're saying. Of course pregnancy isn't guaranteed with sex. It's a risk an individual takes. I'm not against people planning their pregnancies. I'm against paying for their birth control. It's part of their life that doesn't involve me. Very similar to me paying for their retirement. They can make their own decisions.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:12 PM
1

I don't believe there is any variety of free will but that's beside the point. We can just talk about changes arising in the brain as a synonym for decision if calling the choice "free" is problematic. Of course there is a choice (am not for denying care in the rare cases of rape). Intercourse without contraception leads to pregnancy. Jumping off a building leads to death.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:42 PM
2

I only want the government to defend against threats an individual has no control over. Yes against pandemics, military issues, environmental issues, etc. No to personal choices, e.g. pregnancy.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:22 PM
0

I'm talking about discrimination. You could argue that for the planned parenthood issues but I generally I think health care should be left to the individual and there's nothing to stop companies from providing leave. It's just not mandated. The women's issues that I see as most important are genital mutilation and bans from education in certain parts of the world. But I don't like call it a women's issue because if you have to be a woman to want to fix that, you're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 09:22 PM
1

missed the k
/r/MensRights12/12/17 07:28 PM
45

It's because there is really nothing left for feminists to do today. Everything has to be between the lines, some for of lurking and intangible threat. That way, you can always say it's there and anybody who disagrees is a bigot for not understanding. If it's a one-on-one conversation, the other person will just be like "what the fuck are you talking about". There's nothing to it without the mob of willful illusions behind it. I can tell the train is at the end of the line when it comes to witch…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 05:35 PM
167

Well the point in this sub is that depression would never fly if a man committed a crime as a result, even if he killed his own child.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:54 PM
5

heyyyyyyy ooooooooo
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:23 PM
553

The maximum jail term for infanticide is five years. wait wat.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:23 PM
3

Not a rhetorical question but is there a single person here or that anyone knows of that feels this way? I always want to point out though that it is a double standard in most cases, but there are differences. Men are physically stronger (and more intimidating in that way, especially if you don't know them well) and more likely to be obsessive creeps. It's not relevant in many of the cases but I don't think there are parts of it where some differences exist.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:12 PM
6

They have the most obscure inventors and "notable" people nobody has ever heard of but not this. :|
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:08 PM
3

But you first said that you could force a 50/50 split, then you say that people wouldn't like the results. I agree they might not like the results, but if we can force the split that's all we need to do. But yes I agree it might not last long because we would get news stories about beauty queens and shit being killed and everyone would flip out. How the draft is still set up in such a sexist way still blows my mind With all the raging gender politics now it gets zero attention.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:12 PM
1

How does that backfire on men though? If you are forcing a 50/50 then what are you afraid of?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:25 PM
6

Could also backfire. If the draft was really reinstated having them do a 50/50 split of male/female would horrifically backfire on men. You could easily force a 50/50 split on most positions
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:55 PM
1

There's good reason to not want a nanny which is? I'm just trying to help you understand why alimony is a thing willing to change my mind but not seeing anything here that couldn't be easily solved by adult willing to agree to financial arrangements. I understand the point about building a career and the possible nanny vacuum. But even then it doesn't make sense to give alimony proportional to the income, should be proportional to average income.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:30 PM
1

The answer isn't "well both should have careers" because many times married couples need someone managing the home. If you can't afford a nanny, etc on double income you aren't building a career either.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:50 PM
26

The system doesn't make sense either way. Before women could actually work I get it, but today it makes no sense. Why even get legally married? I would just split the bank accounts, drop half of both salaries in each account. If she decides she hates me she can take her half and leave that morning. Don't want a bunch of shit with lawyers anyway.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:47 PM
8

Wait what? How does this make any sense? Assume it was true. People have some disadvantage so their punishments should be different? Should my jail time be reduced if I murder someone while I'm poor?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:37 PM
3

wtf huffington post not having a double standard???
/r/MensRights23/10/17 03:38 PM
25

Imagine if this was 22 year old guy in a frat, and he had done this to a 17 year old girl who lied about her age to get into the party. Life over.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:47 PM
1

I don't see this reaching the audience that thinks the sub is full of misogyny. Applauding women's rights on this level is extremely low hanging fruit. We should be focusing on how totally fucked up it is that it took them until 2017 to do this. What a backwards culture.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:03 PM
1

I assume the only way an adult could believe something as childish as this is if they have another agenda to support. Like maybe, we should be able to treat men however we want and any fault in my life is a result of me being a victim of some lurking, intangible problem in society.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:02 PM
3

Extraordinary? She comes from a rich as fuck family, sent to an elite school where she does drugs and hooks up with dudes on tinder. The guy was not seriously injured and did not need to go to the hospital. The response doesn't seem totally crazy to me in isolation, but I do agree that had the genders been reversed we could have seen the guy go to jail as a "tinder predator" or some shit and he could be locked up for months or more. There must be similar cases where this has happened? Anyway she…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:55 PM
12

convinced the teen's mother--who had custody--to allow the teen to move in with her in her Tallmadge home through a court approved "partial parental custody" arrangement. What. the. fuck. This one is so bad I don't know what the say. The double standard here is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:19 PM
1

boat? it was a kayak. it was a plea deal that she took to plead for negligent homicide meaning the intent wasn't to kill him. formatting helpcontent policy save [–]DarkLorde117 159 points 7 hours ago “I wanted him dead and now he’s gone and I’m fine with it.” I have no idea how this is acceptable since it was apparently a planned murder but she will likely be released in under a year.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:31 PM
1

Why are we taking "bloggers" seriously on anything? It's just any idiot with a platform. It doesn't matter. If she were a "sociologist and blogger" there might be a reason to care.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:58 PM
0

Exactly, and if you destroy your own ability to testify because you choose to inhibit your ability to think via chemicals your testimony shouldn't be taken very seriously.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:56 PM
2

I get downvoted like crazy if I say it in any other sub, but you are the only person responsible for your decisions if you compromise your own ability to think. And it is not "blaming the victim" to say that you can foolishly increase your chances of becoming a victim by doing dumb things like ingesting chemicals. If I don't want my car broken into I won't park it in compton with an ipad on the drivers seat.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:55 PM
2

Absolutely. It can be very hard for a female to handle the aftermath of a sexual assault, but generally much easier for them to find support. Glad someone is acknowledging it.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:42 PM
3

holy. shit.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:24 PM
1

Got a half chub just from reading the legal pad. Equal opportunity, not equal outcomes.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:45 PM
2

Men aren't more reasonable, they're just more eager. I think a few other things matter too. Generally women aren't as aggressive as men or as fixated on a partner's physical traits. Women on average care about physical traits, but also want someone who is some mixture of resourceful and sensitive. They want to choose, and men want to pursue. I think this leads to the interpretation that when a woman asks a man to undress in public it comes of as a compliment that he's attractive to all women (be…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:32 PM
2

When Tillyer was arrested, she denied the claims and said she had been raped by the children. She later pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual activity with a child. wow.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:48 PM
4

Jesus Christ. I think you should take legal action. Even if the case doesn't amount to much, there needs to be more legal documentation of these events which amount to harassment. Doesn't your phone have record of her yelling/grabbing it? I do not endorse it of course, but as devil's advocate: even if you were a weirdo filming kids in the park, what part of that is illegal?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:45 PM
1

Wouldn't it make sense for all names to be protected until proven guilty? Even outside of sexual assault, people use the tactic of accusations to damage a reputation.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:49 PM
5

Judge Judy is the bomb. Not sure how legit she is as a judge now but her time in the real court system was baller.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:35 PM
3

Who cares? Private business can do what they want and if women want to go to that, whatever. It's not a rights issue until I'm legally different from others. I'll go to another gym if my membership is paying for stuff I can't use.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:59 PM
9

Sort of a side issues, but if you're too drunk to consent I think you are also too drunk to have any good memory of what happened or where to place blame (assuming no other evidence of a struggle or resistance). If you're going to do drugs that remove your ability to comprehend and react you have to take responsibility for what happens to yourself. I am not blaming the victim. I'm saying we can't trust testimony from people on drugs. If you remove your own credibility you will put yourself at so…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:54 PM
23

Eventually, he was not charged with sexual assault after police found two witnesses who said she was a willing partner in the drunken romp. So he wasn't charged because they determined there was no sexual assault, but she is protected under anonymity for life for being a potential sexual assault victim. ok...
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:53 PM
3

The justice system slants too far in favor of women on this issue, but still. Why have sex with someone like her? Even if there were no issues with men being unfairly convicted, her response to embarrassment is to accuse her partner of a serious crime. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:35 PM
1

why does her face look so small here looks photoshopped but she is still an angelic beacon of hope 4 evr
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:08 PM
0

No. Fat was more attractive than not in terrible situations where it simply meant you had enough food/resources to carry a baby to term. Attractiveness for both sexes in stable environments has been stable historically. Men find it immediately attractive when a woman has the biological resources that indicate good child rearing (TnA). Women find it immediately attractive when a man has resources for supporting a family (money and influence). Yes there are caveats with hormone cycles in women and…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 11:10 PM
1

It's not the states responsibility to pay for someone who does that, nor should they use money to push toward a "nuclear family structure".
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:42 PM
1

That's not even close to a solution. Why should there be tax breaks and why should a prenup be easy to throw out?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:29 PM
23

Seriously. This retarded post should be removed.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:23 PM
0

I believe inequality. ps Im a gurl.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:14 PM
6

Oh so you're saying they can't have opinions on men's issues, and women raping men is a men's issue. Hurt my head because the idea of someone not being able to have an opinion because of how they are born is so weird. It has become so common though. People say it about race and sex and everything. Complete opposite of removing lines between different people.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:45 PM
2

Wat. Is this some kind of weird SJW religion hybrid of gay is a choice and you're sexist because of it?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:29 PM
2

Yeah I've seen her say a lot of reasonable stuff I don't know how she sits at that table with those harpies every day. Oh yeah, metric tons of cash.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:27 PM
1

Lol @ the rest of the table's screeching Absolutely agreed. If you are a 90lb person and you smack a 190lb person...you...are stupid. You can't know where someone is going to take violence, and if you have that starting advantage it's often reasonable to make it clear that the fight ends now. But yeah, that first person who gets violent over a verbal argument is a jackass.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:25 PM
28

I...don't follow. Men don't have opinions therefor men can be raped by women? wat.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:18 PM
19

The one that annoys me the most is STEM education stuff. All girls schools, fuckloads of vagina scholarships, etc. So far as I know it's all privately funded so whatever, but it does seem silly.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:21 PM
4

accuser texted her friend "Ohmygod I jus did something so fuckig stupid" [sic throughout]. She then proceeded to fret that she had done something wrong and her roommate would never talk to her again, because "it's pretty obvi I wasn't an innocent bystander." She also complained that the other man, who had come over after the alleged assault, had taken until 5 in the morning to finally have sex with her. So this chick is just slutty to point point of blowing unconscious dudes and then having sex …
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:17 PM
1

I still think it's no more than a few steps away from becoming inclusive. This has happened in history with religious piety when people start adding tacit "if" clauses. We're all equal if we meet conditions x,y,z such as being wealthy or male or christian or whatever. The USA even had "separate but equal" racism. You might say that these people aren't "true" egalitarians then. By definition I guess that's right, but I'm talking about how easy it is for people to fall intro us vs them ranks psych…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:47 PM
1

wtf economics was 90% of what I knew about it but google tells me it's not the central concern. Although: "a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs" I was exposed from some books that are basically summed up here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#IncWea
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:07 PM
1

Egalitarianism is incapable of becoming that by definition. Not at all. "you greedy fucks won't share your money"
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:56 PM
3

It always makes me really cynical when I see people in ___ rights groups say hateful shit like this. "I should beat your racist ass to death", "fuck off you homophobic piece of shit", "kill all male babies". They get a pass because it's somehow in service of something good, but is it really? Seems more like they are looking for an excuse to unbottle hate. The kind of thinking that starts bigotry in the first place.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:18 PM
19

I still don't think sport should segregate by gender, but it's hilarious when they let a (born) man into a female sport because they have to accept their decision to be trans. How's a social construct feel when it's slamming it's fists into your face?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:30 PM
1

Depends a lot on the sport. Power lifting, no. Cycling, swimming, maybe.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:51 PM
0

I actually don't see the point in doing it that way. There would be few women in the top of most sports but there would be some.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:26 PM
2

Wow common law marriage is horseshit. I have heterosexual male friends who meet almost all the requirements just by buying a house together. fuck these states: Colorado District of Columbia Iowa Kansas Montana Rhode Island South Carolina Texas (calls it "informal marriage") Utah
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:58 PM
2

I would be surprised if there were no way to draw up a contract that would be enforceable here. If it was like you described I would just not get married and simply put the things that make sense in both names, or delineate ownership percentage as you would in business.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:19 PM
4

What in the fuck? I just looked this up and it's not rare for prenups to be thrown out? Since when is a legal document like that just tossed? What the fuck?! Curious though if anyone with legal experience could describe how you could avoid the common reasons a prenup is thrown out. A major thing seems to be that it was "signed under duress". Seems easy to prove otherwise. Wouldn't having a judge witness the signing rule out most of these possibilities?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:48 PM
4

The answer is a nuclear level prenup. No reason not to.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:27 PM
1

Ok first of all why is having sex a lot such a prize? I get that's what lots of early twenties people want, but I'd argue it's pretty overrated. These subs seem to just assume that it's worth it at nearly any cost though. It doesn't matter to me if some "alpha" male is banging bimbos left and right. Chicks that are hooking up with him aren't my type anyway. Second. Of course people are annoyed by these douche bags. Guys like that are the male equivalent of all the hair twirling "gamer" girls sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 07:13 PM
4

I can't imagine having 15 million dollars and still giving a fuck about anything ever again.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:04 PM
1

How is this a debate?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 05:23 AM
2

Why is this posted here? It's not a policy problem it's just a terribly bigoted person on twitter. Or is she some kind of public figure that I don't know about?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 09:35 PM
1

Lol can you imagine a dude saying this? Yeah she was 17 but I felt really bad about myself and needed to have sex with her to believe I'm still worth something.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 07:22 PM
1

I'm speaking generally, and assuming the people in question have interacted with the kid for at least a few conversations. I can see how it would happen but the average 12 year old is much different from the average 18 year old. Although the OP was about an age of consent of 16 so that's even easier.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 06:15 PM
1

Agreed for the most part. There's a limit to puberty development. It has sped up because it depends on fat and people love to eat these days.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:54 PM
1

:|
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:53 PM
-3

Seems hard to confuse a 12 year old with someone old enough though... Edit: Nice downvotes for expressing an opinion here.. Obviously the court put more thought into it than I have. Never said they were wrong. Here, where the aoc is 18 I can't imagine confusing a 12 year old for that but perhaps 16 is more reasonable. I still think its kind of fucked up to have sex with a 12 year old. Seems like to question a post in this sub is to throw meat to piranhas.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:58 PM
1

Sure but all of these type of conversations have plenty of time for that.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:30 PM
0

I mean it is harassment if you don't want it.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:12 PM
11

Wait what's the surprise here? I mean it's tinder... You spend 2 seconds evaluating someone, of course a model does well.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:04 PM
1

Probably PhD, then artist, then job, depending on the specifics of all of them. I want the same things women want stereotypically. Doesn't have to be a model but knows how to present herself. Capable and resourceful. Most importantly, intelligent with a sense of humor. And 7'4 with a huge dong. But seriously you pick a partner who is interesting and that you can share mutual respect with. Not completed. Her occupation only indicates what traits she might have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 06:17 AM
1

How does this shit happen? So was there any actual evidence or just what she said? Not reading this article on my phone atm.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/17 07:00 AM
33

amen.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:51 PM
20

Well I'm not saying they should lose the ability to have a place to stay and whatnot. There's a a lot at stake if the couple agrees to have one person sacrifice career advancement. However, I don't see any reason why they should maintain the "lifestyle" of their marriage, so long as they are able to live in reasonable comfort in the aftermath of the divorce. My thought is that they should be able to maintain something like average income, but I don't see why anything more than that would be requ…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:33 PM
1044

What is the idea behind he whole "accustomed to a lifestyle" thing? I mean if you have that "lifestyle" because of the person you married, then why shouldn't you lose that lifestyle when you are no longer married to that person?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:42 PM
1

This is the most obvious reason why the wage gap thing is typically not true. If there were some lurking sexism in the work of today's modern world there are plenty of well educated, motivated people running large companies. They would have the knowledge and the resources to tease out those variables and save huge on payroll.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 12:20 AM
4

This may not be real, but things very similar to this happen all the time. These people are among the worst people in society. It's not as bad as murder but how many steps away is it for you to commit someone to an entire life that is a lie and continually feed them that misinformation?
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:34 PM
2

People are charged differently for murder based on age.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:29 PM
84

She was 15, and had sent them to multiple people at school. It makes no sense for her to face no consequences, since she was obviously looking for boners by sending them to plenty of guys in the school. But I think the reason she didn't face any problems was that she was too young to be worth it. As they said: The other boys—the ones who had shared Kim's pictures and actually engaged in wrongdoing—were only 16 years old, which meant they weren't worth prosecuting. But Austin was 17, and 17-year-…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 10:54 PM
2

Agreed. They're really jamming it down people's throats now on some TV shows.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:51 AM
1

I totally disagree with this whole idea. Same for female role models or whatever. Movies and TV are fantasy. Children can play games and imagine things with that stuff but it's not reality and I don't think the artists who create it have any obligation to create special characters for children to "look up to". Parents should teach children to look for real people, and realistically speaking, not to idolize anyone. If I had kids I would let them watch anything they want and tell them not to make …
/r/MensRights16/01/17 06:31 AM
2

People give lots of bad reasons to sue but in cases like these it is somewhat selfish not to do it. I get why any single individual doesn't want to martyr themselves but eventually we need a news story about how someone one a suit after a company used something like "mansplaining" in a decision regarding an employee. It's some sexist shit.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 06:25 AM
0

If you treat the genders as a class, and impose responsibility across generations to that class But I don't, and I said that's a stupid thing to do. Nobody should do that.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:02 PM
23

God damn, is this sub turning into a punch of alt-right idiocy too? Hard to say women "owe men a debt of gratitude" when they generally weren't allowed to participate in any of the mentioned things in the past. Men didn't do it because they were men, they did it because they needed a job, or because women couldn't be conscripted. Also, to add to how thick skulled this is, we're mostly talking about people in the past. This has the ancient, stupid sentimentality that your ancestors are a part of …
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:43 PM
10

What? I thought this was one of the few posts here that actually makes a good point. We're never going to mix "genders" in a shelter. It's going to cause all kinds of problems with fucked up people mingling. The point is that whatever you "identify" does not mean we can treat it as biological fact. I'm not saying that we should be totally insensitive to those issues, but there are clear lines. It's not perfect for "men's rights" but it is true that shelters are comparatively abundant for women. …
/r/MensRights22/12/16 08:16 PM
37

It happens all the time now. You can find lots of articles about "white people" in pop culture savvy publications. They have the one two punch for dummies feeling powerful. 1. We're fighting oppression somehow so we can't be wrong. 2. If you disagree you can only be part of the problem.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:56 AM
4

Cutting vegetables on him? What the shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 06:52 PM
27

Jaye is bae.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:44 PM
14

Well it basically prescribes treating women as though they aren't rational decision makers. That's true for many people, and lots of slutty girls are predictable but why would I want to be with those people? It's not relevant to any respectable person who is looking for a serious partner. For that, I already know everything I need to know. Make a friend, see if it has potential for more. There's no secret. That sub seems to be for people who have no idea what they're doing socially and want to h…
/r/ExRedPill03/11/16 04:18 AM
3

I think it was at one point designed to protect women from being trapped in a situation where they couldn't leave a terrible husband. You can't just go live on your own if you have no job experience over the last 10 years and no money of your own. Today however, it makes no sense and I wouldn't recommend anyone getting married without a rock solid prenup. There's no good reason to have someone stay at home for a long period of time.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:36 PM
1

via blackberry I wouldn't give her a seat either.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 05:39 PM
11

Going to need a citation on this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 05:38 PM
-4

I've noticed that too. The genetics aren't so favorable there.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 05:36 PM
69

Davis cites similar cases in which sentences were much lighter. A female teacher from Biloxi was sentenced to only one year for having sex with a male student. “The defendant cannot comprehend a female defendant having sex with an underage male warrants a one-year sentence,” the motion said. “Sentencing courts clearly cannot sentence a defendant harsher because of their sexual orientation.” Yep.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:50 PM
2

Yep it's just more of the "I don't have to worry about how I look and if you don't like how I look, well then you're a bigot" thing. Thankfully there are actual measurements or clothes would never fit. The actual measurements for people like her are still basically what people idealize today, but "beauty standards" have been kinda different in the past. It's always some version of T and A though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 06:39 PM
2

Care to site any of this beyond the initial link? One projection from a CS guy in python isn't scientific cannon and your explanation is totally inferred an unscientific. There have been discussions of this phenomenon in many major publications and it's been attributed to higher rates of education and professional goals, coupled with an increase in "settling down" i.e. buying a home and so forth. All rational responses to changing economics. As far as I'm concerned there is nothing more than cyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 09:04 PM
2

I like how "neurological conditions are not an excuse". Oh, then what is? You're brain can be broken and even that doesn't excuse behavior that by definition you can't control or understand?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:28 PM
1

I'm not talking about some guys though, I'm talking about the trend. The spike in the style that has been dying out. It's been a fad. Actually I think when it comes to preferences in fashion, if I don't personally like something that's the only thing that does make it dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:15 PM
5

What I'm talking about is how people deny the intentions. Usually the outfits speak for themselves, so there's nothing to shout. It's usually men that do it, and I've heard the man bun thing from a number of guys. Women only seem to do it when the attention is unwanted. That's what annoys me, when people pretend that they should decide how other people see them. That's not how it works. I wouldn't say I have had a shitty experience. I don't think it's hard to find cooler people who aren't so ost…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:06 PM
4

I can never tell if someone is satirizing on this sub, but that's not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say that it's used to look attractive but nobody is upfront about the intentions. If a chick likes the guys who says she looks good she can say "thanks", otherwise she can say "im just wearing these to be comfortable you pig". It's like how guys were wearing those stupid hair buns on top. They would come up with practical reasons like "it makes it easy to control my hair" and stuff, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:51 PM
11

What I hate about it is how anything goes once you have the hedge of "its more comfortable". Okay, I can't experience exactly what you find comfortable, but I also can't believe you're so stupid that you don't expect men to look. It's a strategic position where you can try to attract the guys you do like (who think it but don't say it) while calling the rude guys creeps. If you think you're just wearing yoga pants for comfort, would you not be weirded out by a guy that approached while wearing y…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 06:59 PM
4

Yeah, that's a fair point. I couldn't find many other sources on this story. It's just that DM seems to miss facts from time to time.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:41 PM
-15

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ :\
/r/MensRights07/10/16 06:00 PM
0

I don't think that's true. If intelligence is roughly problem solving, you need to be rational to do it. The issue is that people don't stop being any less selective about their reasoning as they get more intelligent. So you can be smart but self deceived, and then well equipped for the mental gymnastics to defend a 6000 year old earth or whatever.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:36 PM
7

Maybe in the last 5 years, but prior to that their whole reputation was based on how rigorous their work was. Apparently witch hunts can infect the well educated.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:35 PM
-1

I'd love it if my imaginary, yet abusive girlfriend wore boxing gloves while she beat me. She's just so strong, so muscular, so fierce, so she.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:48 PM
1

This is what she will say in court.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:44 PM
1

Do you even inflation?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 10:48 PM
14

I'm not at all surprised trump would say this, but I'm kinda surprised the daily show isn't cancelled.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:43 PM
16

I brought this up at work once and everyone said the deal was they just generally did different stuff. Like they can pick up kids and other women and do the mechanical stuff that doesn't need heavy lifting. Made sense to me actually but I guess I'd have to hear it from someone who knows more about firefighting.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:29 PM
1

I'll be the judge of that. I wasn't into it at all the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 03:33 PM
4

I'm 6'3 and every girl I have dated or talked to about dating has mentioned it. Some would ask for pictures of me next to a car or other people so they could see my height. However, it's possible they were shallow cunts and/or just being nice and looking for something positive to say about me. :|
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:40 PM
1

I strongly desired sexual intimacy as young as 5 or 6 http://imgur.com/VntG8Gy
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:16 PM
1

Hire me for your next MBTI get together.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 04:53 PM
1

It's not useful for anything. It's a horoscope for atheists. It's a perfect example of internet research and gullibility. It gives a little spike of dopamine by telling you what a special snowflake you are, along the lines of the other multi-variable descriptions of, say, sexuality a la tumblr. It's just pathetic. It has no predictive power, was created by non-scientists, and is not taken seriously in psychology. it appears that the MBTI does not conform to many of the basic standards expected o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 07:41 PM
-8

Does anyone do this who isn't a brainwashed internet-informed blogging feminist? I mean if you are some crazy sociopath who can't tell why he shouldn't rape people, then you would still know it's illegal right?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:41 PM
1

I have known a number of people who survived it and I thought the deal was that it was somewhat easy to detect because it screwed up the way you piss. So you end up going to the doctor, they put a finger in your butt and tell you they have to treat your cancer. Yeah: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cancer_mortality_rates_in_the_United_States Prostate cancer is the most survivable actually.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:43 PM
1

Weird. As far as cancers going that one is very survivable.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:19 PM
1

Has anyone double checked those stats? I'm pretty sure some of them are true, but no research funds for male only cancer? Testicular?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:58 PM
5

Well what's the normal sentence for an actual rape? She nearly put someone through with that and wasted the court systems resources in the process.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:19 PM
15

Yeah, what? How did her lawyers not demand she take that? 5 months for banging someone underage is not bad.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:55 PM
16

he judge also said the victim had some “culpability,” because he also knew it was wrong. Under state law, the victim was too young to consent to sex. Imagine someone saying that about a female. "BLAMING THE VICTIM!"
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:55 PM
14

however hypocritical it may be Lol.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:26 PM
2

So could we get you with a shoe on your head for this? Also were you an exotic depressed and desperate webcam girl at some point or is the name from something else?
/r/MensRights13/08/16 04:02 AM
1

Ok well that is a little different than I was thinking. But I don't see how that would work. If you're a better hunter, you can secretly keep some for yourself or your family when it counts, or you can slack off because nobody is going to hold you to bringing in 3 times as much meat when you could still be way above average when you bring in 2 time as much.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 12:55 AM
0

Because women are less often violent. It could be helpful to preventing crimes against women and children if just being male on a certain train car was enough to have you removed. Maybe that rule would be changed if you had a child with you as a man. I'm not talking about details. I didn't even propose something like this. I said it doesn't seem like a great idea but i wonder if there would be advantages in crime ridden areas. Your kind of sputtering knee jerk reaction to this is part of the rea…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 12:35 AM
1

I don't think that really means anything. It works when there is no reason to unevenly distribute wealth? Well, yeah. It's too hard to leach in something like that.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 12:31 AM
2

She's an egalitarian. I think the obvious problem with things like this is that most people aren't motivated by the things egalitarians are. It just takes a few greedy assholes to leech off that system. Although personally I think it's pretty silly that money is the end all reward. We should be competing for the jobs that have the greatest effect on life satisfaction and happiness. Money is useless for that after like 75k/year.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:36 PM
-4

This doesn't seem like a great idea, but I do wonder if there would be advantages in crime ridden areas for women with children. Violent criminals who prey on strangers are much much more likely to be male.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:33 PM
1

What does this have to do with men specifically? And this seems pretty critical to me: They asked the teenager for her phone and laptop passwords without a warrant, while she was not under arrest, and without properly advising her of her right to a lawyer. If you read the texts, she seems like a complete sociopath. It wouldn't be too surprising to me if she went on find ways to kill other people. However, this might not be the whole story. I think your parents know you're in a really bad place. …
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:31 PM
-1

Oh no scary words!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 12:24 AM
6

I was actually almost with her until she said that horrible sexist shit women learn in a very different way women are more naturally self reflective She keeps talking like women are frail and need their hands held through shit. But I don't know why either of them bring up gender differences. It doesn't even matter if men and women are different in some biological way. It would still be no reason to hire/promote/whatever people based on anything other than their individual merit. Even if women we…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:00 PM
5

This is just demonstrably wrong. First of all, evo psych doesn't matter here because we are not optimally configured for reproduction. If we were, the most joyful experience for a man would be a donation to a sperm bank, and there wouldn't be much homosexuality. No, we are (sub-optimally) tweaked to find mates in our ancient environment, and to raise our young. These things result in love and bonding. I'm not saying it's simple, but just as you can stew on anger and learn to manage it, you can d…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 10:09 PM
2

.-----. / `\ _|_ | / \ | '===' | . ' . | . : ' . | '. | . ' . | .-"""-. | / \___ \ | |/` \| | ( a a ) | | _\ | | Oh, I didn't see you there! )\ = / | _.-' '---; | /` `-. | | \ | | | . & . \ | \ / & | ; | | | | ; | | /\ / | | \ \ ) -:- /\ \ | `. `-. -:- | \ \_| '-. `-. ( './\`\ / `'-. `\ | \/_/ | \ | | | | /'-\ / | \ \ | | | \ )_/\ | | \ \| | \ \ | '. | | / / | / .'; | /` / | | / / | | | .' \ | | / \ ) | | \ \ / '-.._ | '.ooO\__._.Ooo |
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 08:34 PM
3

Yeah dude, like the purest love would just be between two men. You just get me. I'd totally love to make love to you right now bro, no homo.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 08:07 PM
9

No, this is basically pseudo-science. Maybe there is some kinda meaningful way to measure skill at different "intelligences" but there are no implications for teaching as you are advocating. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-teaching-to-a-students-learning-style-a-bogus-idea/ If you appeal to a person’s style versus going against his preferred style, that should make a difference for learning outcomes,” he says. Harold Pashler of the University of California, San Diego, and his collea…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:01 PM
6

People are behaving like the success of a shitty hack remake movie has something to do with the validity of blogger feminism. It doesn't, but I'm glad if hollywood will be discouraged from making shit like this.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 06:37 PM
3

wut r u werin bby
/r/MensRights15/07/16 09:36 PM
12

Fuck. Why did I hire that shaman?!
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:56 PM
1

I like sci fi and have rolled my share of polyhedrons but I just don't like that crowd and cosplay seems very ostentatious to me. Most of them fit into two groups. Those that are socially impaired and show up because they don't know how else to interact, and those that use it as the same social strata as high school where the pretty girls with XBOX HUEG tits are worshiped for another Mad Moxxi cosplay. Both things aren't what I would want in a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 07:15 PM
1

Next time I see your username I'll be sure to check my phone and pretend like I have to be in the next sub over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 06:37 PM
1

Nah I could see friend of a friend or something, but we would just awkwardly ignore each other and if we happened to be in the same grocery store days later we would pretend we didn't recognize each other. You know the drill!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 05:48 PM
1

Yeah we would never get to the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 04:54 PM
2

For me these are things I would like to know prior to anything sexual going down. But I agree on the first day and probably the second. There are more important things to talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 10:16 PM
1

Count me in with that group. Not crazy about cosplay either. In both cases I would like to know up front without stalking facebook.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 10:15 PM
3

I hate hiking and camping and I will not be doing myself any favors in the long run by pretending that I do. That said, I also might wait until we know eachother better to reveal that I'm bisexual or that I do cosplay. Be the best you! Strongly disagreeing here. Obviously look for things you have in common but don't hold back in order for the other person to have too many feelings to reject you. If something is dubious, make it known early so they know what they're getting into. Otherwise, peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 09:41 PM
1

Yeah it would maybe circumvent some cheating, but at that point we're almost talking about someone cheating with a sex robot. Very few people would have feelings doing something like that, but to me I still see why the other person might be hurt. It's like, hey I'm open to have sex with you to further our relationship but instead of waiting or putting in the effort for a good evening together you banged a robot. Not as bad as a side piece perhaps, but probably not ideal. :|
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 12:14 AM
2

Yes and I think it also account for the silly, but common cheater's response of "it didn't even mean anything, baby!". Many cheaters might be honest when saying that but of course it doesn't account for 1. breach of trust in cheating 2. possibility of actually having feelings for the side piece 3. the side piece having feelings for the cheater and seeding feelings in the cheater. So all in all, yeah it's a shitty thing to do to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 12:06 AM
4

I would say, generally and anecdotally that women tend to think they are somewhat worthless if they aren't able to find a partner, where men see themselves as pathetic. My feeling is that women tend to think there is less they can do about fixing it so it might be worse on their side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 11:37 PM
2

I didn't know anyone considered that kind of thing to be amoral. That's ridiculous. Who wants to date someone who freely admits they will potentially "upgrade" later on? If they are seriously drawn out of their relationship to someone else for their attractiveness/fame/money they probably weren't looking for much depth in the first place. They should come to terms with this fact and make an honest departure from their current partner. Both parties should be relieved to put that relationship to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 11:34 PM
8

They might be similar acts physically but they aren't the same thing mentally. Have lunch with a friend, that's fun. Now, think about having lunch with a friend who has two weeks to live. It's much different because you are clinging to the relationship in that case. I think thoughtful people who have sex with someone they care about are trying to enhance the relationship. Casual sex is more like a vice. Meeting a friend as an excuse to get chocolate cake.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 11:31 PM
3

What kind of question is this? If everything else is equal then isn't there only an upside to dating the girl with more resources in her family? It's not even necessarily shallow. I usually prefer girls who haven't been spoiled in wealthy families but if I have to weigh the trouble she and I might have in the future that's a real problem. Caring for her family will be a serious challenge without money.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 08:42 PM
-2

This is not really men's rights, this is men's stupidity.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:20 PM
3

We're talking about propagating misogyny, not a word.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 10:13 PM
102

Yep. That increase of women mentioning it could be them protesting it.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 05:29 PM
2

She forgot to change the font and formatting as though you're changing your voice in a moving speech. Fucking "occupy" faggots...
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:49 PM
1

What difference does it really make today when we are talking about endurance and handling a gun?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:35 PM
8

Are we sure this wasn't an accident on the part of the quiz creator?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:29 PM
1

I have lost a few friends to this kind of thing too. People now act like it's their duty to be as offended as possible when it comes to any issues of how people identify themselves. It's stupid for many reasons but the funniest part to me is how they seem to think spitting hatred is a solution. Like if you want people to change, the best way to do it is to shame, insult, censor and control your way to the world you want.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:16 PM
2

In modern war what reason is there to not have all roles filled approximately 50/50 male/female? I'll still be pretty annoyed if women aren't put into combat.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:08 PM
1

Yes strictly speaking, by definition, you can't want to be raped. That's not what anyone means though. I'm pretty sure that these thoughts play off insecurities. The trouble is that if a woman wants to have sex she has to worry that if she comes off too easy some guys will lose interest. So there's this whole ridiculous game of coyness when they want to have sex but don't want to act like it. By pretending the man is forcing himself on her, they can have sex while carefully handling the Emperor'…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 08:06 PM
0

I actually think it makes sense to have mandatory minimums for certain crimes. This got stupid in the 90s with drug laws but for bodily harm it doesn't seem like a judge should be able to reduce a criminal's punishment to an extreme degree.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:55 PM
1

This seems like a sure case of switch the genders and the penalty would be 10 times worse.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:27 PM
3

Misogyny?....What? You kill men who love men and somehow it's against women?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 07:08 PM
15

I thought it was a sexist joke about women in that way, and that does seem like something old navy would stay away from. But now I think the intent might have been fathers of daughters.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:56 PM
32

It's because if you disagree with an accusation of bigotry they simply accuse you of being a bigot. It's witch hunt tactics.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:54 PM
3

That's the exception though. Most of them are awful to mediocre.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:43 PM
3

It's still mind blowing to me that these people can really believe this stuff. We went so far backward so fast.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:55 PM
12

That's like saying everyone who drives a car is a sea captain, whether they like the "label" or not. Usage matters and "feminism" has changed.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 11:22 PM
1

Just get a solid prenup NBD.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 09:25 PM
1

I don't think that's the main reason. Like you said, it could be a genuine moment, but I don't think that's the most likely outcome. The feelings might be real in some cases but it is unlikely. Think if you had a kid, would you want them to be in that situation? I wouldn't. I think it is just not likely to turn out well for them.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/16 09:04 PM
0

I think the idea is that when people are still maturing mentally, they are unable to defend themselves properly against manipulation. But I do agree that among adults it is up to the individual to decide if they are being manipulated and act accordingly. It is possible that you could manipulate a 15 year old cashier in the same way, but I think it is also different when it comes to something sexual. We know that sexual things can be particularly damaging during development and interfere with a p…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/16 07:28 PM
1

The doctor is out … of a job HA HA HA HA HA HA! GREAT ONE, nydailynews.com!!!!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/16 06:25 PM
3

I agree with you to an extent but I think the rationale is that the older person often has to manipulate the younger one and takes advantage of them in some way. In this case she said she would kill herself if he told anyone about it. There are definitely cases where the "victim" does it completely willingly and yet only the older person is punished. I'm not really sure why anyone should be punished in those cases, but the younger person probably doesn't want their reputation affected, so they a…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/16 06:20 PM
5

One of the teen’s friends made a reference on social media about what was happening Fuckin' snitch!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/16 06:17 PM
3

So not ONE woman is "scummy" enough to teach men to get laid? Women will sell fortune telling, juice cleanses, vitamins, even women lawyers will defend accused rapists and murderers. But get a mans dick wet? Fuck that. I'd be surprised if there were zero, and I'm not saying they have to be rationally consistent with other women's scams to avoid doing it. They just generally aren't as interested. I think the difference is that many people who sell crap like juice cleanses and fortune telling eith…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 08:48 PM
3

What are you basing this off of? This and everything here is anecdotal. There are lots of other possible reasons for there not being (more) female "pua's". The first one I can think of is that women may find it deceptive and don't want to contribute to it. Women have no idea what they want? That's a pretty broad statement. There are lots of common factors in female attraction. They like physically attractive partners of course, and generally speaking, are more interested in the social and financ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 07:26 PM
2

You say that like they're not being honest. I think they are, and male spaces might be the only place they can be honest. I know that I have to filter my speech a ton day to day, but around my friends I can be myself for better or worse. I get you so far, and whether or not they're being honest at certain times is pretty difficult to determine. But why would you think you have to be in a "male space" to be totally honest? I was being a bit hyperbolic when I said we were slaves to our ego. I coul…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:33 AM
2

I get what you mean now. This is going off the original topic, but from my point of view I'm kind of confused why that sort of thing exists online. I'm not sure if I object to it, but I always viewed those kind of gender tinted discussion as being somewhat dishonest in that when a guy turns to the other ice fisherman and says "I can't take another day of my awful wife" he doesn't really mean that either. He is venting it but if I meant what he said entirely he would have already left his wife. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:33 PM
2

I'll check it out, thanks. edit: That might be the most informative thing here
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:12 PM
3

After < 30 minutes investigating that is my impression as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:23 PM
4

In his defense I did say "I'd like to hear what you think qualifies you to be a member of whichever group and what you think they opposite side has so wrong." So I guess he's saying they're pussies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:22 PM
2

This venting and men talking to each other like men I'm not sure what this means. As for the BP sub I've only been once or twice. Seems pretty circlejerky, lots of "TRP is a rape machine!!1!" nonsense that, intentionally or not, misrepresents TRPs actual stance. Might be fun if you're into outrage porn I guess. They both seem like a circle jerk to me but I don't think I've ever seen an internet forum that was self critical.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:20 PM
1

Looks like that post got removed before I could read it :[
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:17 PM
1

I put a slice of my opinion in the original post too but it's pretty presumptuous to say I've made up my mind already. The whole purpose of this is to see if I'm mistaken. All you're telling me is that the users on TRP may be dismissive and quick to judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:01 PM
1

That doesn't do much for me. That's pretty vague and general. Every sub is created for the benefit of it's users. It's seems more geared toward the sexual "Strategy" part and how to justify those things e.i. doing whatever it takes to convince women to sleep with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:50 PM
3

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message. ?........ Did you hear they served iceberg lettuce on the Titanic?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:54 PM
2

Mr Jenkins said the following day Tait made a statement to police confirming that she made the story up "on the basis that the man had given her the cold shoulder in the club". Reverse the genders and imagine the outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 01:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter