TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bananapanther Archive

View 4 posts and 78 comments by bananapanther on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And apparently the main goal of most of the people in this subreddit is to be just as disingenuous.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:15 AM
2

If the roles were revered this thread would be an endless stream of “polygraphs are bullshit.” But it fits the MRA agenda and has a hysterical ugly fat woman to point fingers at. Checks a lot of boxes. Frankly I’m leaning more toward the woman lying to her daughter in this case but I’m also confused how the daughter doesn’t know if she was being molested for 15 years. (Admittedly I didn’t watch the entire show so I’m sure that was explained)
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:22 AM
4

Part of the goal is just to keep talking about it as to affect a change in culture over time. If no one talks about it, it’ll never change so being consistently vocal about catcalling keeps it on peoples minds. Of course there are some who want to enact laws and punishments for catcalling and those people are morons.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:13 PM
1

Give me a break bucko. It’s about OP attacking a rape victim by being dismissive of their identity and reducing them to a disorder that they are “suffering” from. I never said gender dysphoria wasn’t a thing.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:32 AM
-3

You’re what gives men’s rights a bad name.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:28 PM
-1

I'm not white knighting, friend. I just disagree with ghosting and think it's the reaction of immature men who run from their problems.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:17 PM
0

Break if off? No, we are talking about ghosting, i.e. Not having the fortitude to break it off.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:59 PM
7

"Ghosting is a childish move by immature women who lack character."
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:44 PM
-2

You probably just shouldn't date women at all then. I mean, they could ruin your life at any point. Better just play it safe and stay single. I thought people around here generally were in favor of owning up to the decisions one makes?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:19 PM
-7

I can't imagine living life afraid of women and being so immature that you can't face your own decisions head on. Running away from your problems, that's what we are championing now?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:04 PM
-13

TRP is leaking. Ghosting is a childish move by immature men who lack character.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:52 PM
-1

Nice straw man.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:20 AM
2

Oh bull fucking shit. Don't come at me with that feminist buzzword tumblr garbage. Bashing on this woman doesn't help bring awareness to anything. It doesn't have anything actionable behind it that we can use to try to change the system. All it is is a bunch of angry men yelling in an echo chamber about how we can't trust women. I don't have to subscribe to your all women are bad version of men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:39 PM
1

No, fuck you. If I disagree I will post a fucking comment here so you don't live in a god damned echo chamber. Man it's like you're trying so hard to emulate third wave feminazis that you want to adopt their authoritarian tactics.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:30 PM
1

Nothing you've said is factual. I'd say it's mostly emotionally biased.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:29 AM
1

Dude, he told me he was going to have his dog fuck me in he ass. Nothing at all to do with the article. And here you come white knighting for some asshole who was so embarrassed of their juvenile comment that they deleted them. We can talk about how your hatred of Heard is misplaced, how her divorce from Jonny Depp may be an example of a proven bias against men and how alimony is mostly bullshit, and we can talk about how her relationship and breakup with Elon Musk isn't related and how this art…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:39 PM
1

You're commenting on my reply to something that's now been deleted. You don't know the context nor the absurd, bullshit that I was responding to. It's no coincidence that it was deleted.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:30 PM
0

lolwut?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:09 PM
-2

😂 I think I got you pegged considering that response.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:07 PM
2

Your basement dweller insults mean shit to me. Your "I'm an ugly loser that doesn't get attention from women so I lash out at them" mentality is pathetic.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:04 PM
18

When people say men's rights is just a bunch of women hating losers, this is why. I joined this subreddit because I care about men's issues but this has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights and reeks of anti-woman ideology. This place has been taken over by a bunch of red pill jerkoffs.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:11 PM
0

Just post the fucking video. This gif gave me cancer.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:46 PM
2

I do not recall the article saying anything about her personal income or lack there of.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:25 AM
2

Link?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:15 AM
6

Ascribing motive to someone without proof is unacceptable and makes you seem anti woman. Did she work during the last 37 years and contribute to their wealth?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:03 PM
4

Yeah fuck liberals and their anti pedophilia ways!
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:50 PM
1

So what are you saying? If a percentage of MRA members are also red pill, is the entirety of MRA is a facade for hating women and treating them like subordinates? Is the goal of MRA to create an equally closed minded and dismissive group as Feminism?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:07 PM
19

I think that the primary reason has nothing to do with fear of being called racist or being attached by radical Islamists and a lot more to do with the fact that, considering the demographic is mostly western white women, they rarely, if ever, will actually have to deal with it in person. Same reason why the entire US gets upset when we are attacked but it's barely reported on when 50 people are killed in Africa. They are disconnected from real mysoginistic abuses.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 11:40 PM
1

This is a 20 year old case in a state where statutory rape wasn't applied to boys until just two years prior. I'm not saying it's not terrible but here's got to be a statute of limitations on what is worth posting about here.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:03 PM
1

You're right, female volunteers would certainly make up the minority of combat volunteers but as long as it's a choice for both men and women, then there's no issue. It shouldn't be your duty to fight for something that a handful of powerful men deem necessary. Imagine if we had an active draft for the Iraq war, a conflict that a large portion of the US population believes to have been unjust. You think I should be forced to fight for that? I do not.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:07 PM
2

In this day and age you don't need to register people to be able to locate people to serve if a draft were necessary. Besides, if we ever got to a point where we were at such risk that a draft were to become necessary, I doubt there would be any issue recruiting people to fight for their country anyway. I don't think the government should have the power to force people to fight for something they don't want to fight for.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:35 AM
1

Well technically 2.69 times. I just grabbed the first tenth but we can round up to 2.7 times.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:22 PM
1

2.6 times more likely.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:50 PM
-4

It didn't happen before. It was an entirely different circumstance and program. It's like saying, "a football player was involved in a rape case, we should be skeptical that all athletes are rapists." Your logic is absurd. This aid program appeals specifically to women because women are the ones who collect water in the affected regions. The specific issue of water collection is woman centric.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:38 PM
-2

Well, the plan that water.org puts in place is the construction of a community well. So unless you imagine that water.org is going to place guards at the well I find it pretty absurd. The situation in Haiti was a food distribution program where there actually were people in charge of handing out food. They are not the same. Just because there is injustice in the world does not mean you should jump to the conclusion that all aid programs are the same. It's pretty easy to take a minute to read abo…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:21 PM
-2

That's an entirely different circumstance. I suppose if you don't read or understand what the Stella program is doing and how it works then you can jump to dumb conclusion though.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:49 PM
-8

No I think you just want it to mean women and children so you have something to be mad about. Unless you actually think someone is going to go door to door and make sure only women and children are befitting from easy access to water.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:40 AM
5

How are you going to have a petition that doesn't even link to the proposed budget cut you are angry about? I also seem to remember this coming up before and that it's not as big of a deal as you're making it out to be. The CDC has relatively little to do with prostate cancer research.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:36 PM
1

Not to mention that the study was based on a specific type of domestic violence, not ALL domestic violence. Suggesting that the study was all inclusive is a lie and is no better that people that cherry pick data suggesting the converse.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:26 AM
0

I think it's more likely that the while thing was staged to solicit responses.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:01 AM
1

NFL players have been getting away with DV cases forever, without being crucified. The shear size of the NFL and the fact that there was a very clear video of Rice is what made this blow up. I'm not saying there isn't a double standard but there is a clear reason why the NFL is getting chastised and it's not because Ray Rice is a guy.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:51 PM
6

There is a double standard but you have to realize that the NFL is only just now being scrutinized because there was a video. No video and the general public would never have heard about Rice and he would be playing this week.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:37 PM
5

Ray Rice would have been swept under the rug if that video didn't exist. Hope Solo is being publicly scrutinized and I wouldn't be surprised to see her get some kind of suspension.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:30 PM
0

The NFL is a billion dollar company that's watched by millions of people every weekend. The athletes that work for them are much more well known and famous. They are used in million dollar promotions by huge companies like Nike and Subway. I agree, there is definitely a double standard but it's like comparing a homemade rocket launch to NASA.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:14 PM
-1

Selective service exists but conscription is no longer in effect. The government has the potential to reinstate conscription but right now no one is being drafted. Or are you being purposefully daft?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:32 PM
-2

When the draft is reinstated I'll change my position. Until then, I don't see those who voluntarily risk their lives as victims. Heroes potentially and certainly deserving of respect but not victims.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:08 PM
0

Yes I understand this. I'm not defending what Hilary said but rather questioning the comments in this thread, made mostly by Americans, that our soldiers are victims. They are heroic and brave and their deaths are tragic but I hesitate to call them victims.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:00 PM
-9

Can soldiers who willingly join the armed forces be considered victims? I would argue that innocent casualties are the primary victims of war. That's like saying someone who agrees to have sex can become a victim if they regret it after. Ready for the downvotes.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:44 PM
2

Agreed. I don't think a single one of those quotes was made in the context of losing a loves one at war. It is propaganda, repurposing girly quotes to push an agenda. As if women shouldn't be allowed those feelings ever. Had me confused. A link to wiki quote would have been sufficient.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:37 PM
-4

Fair point but why attack feminism? The issue is that society doesn't stand up for men in this situation however, pointing a finger at feminism as a whole makes men's rights look blatantly and willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:05 AM
-7

Seems more like an abortion issue than a men's rights one. Or has MRA just become the anti-feminist group?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:40 AM
2

Is it necessary to medicate these children or do you think a chane in the education system could make learning easier for children with ADHD? Clearly in the past people with undiagnosed ADHD have been successful, so does the need to medicate lie more in the current school environment?
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:26 AM
4

Exactly, MRA is turning (has turned) into nothing more than the inverse of radical feminism.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:09 AM
19

It's not like shirts don't exist with humorous statements that marginalize women. What is the point of mens rights? Bringing up trivial shit like this is no better than what we call out radfems for doing. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:07 AM
-2

There are a few intelligent folks like CertusAT here in MRA to counterbalance the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:01 AM
0

Just another example of someone from MR going out of there way to create an issue where there isn't any. What is constructive about this post? Nothing. The only purpose is to rustle our jimmies and create a circle jerk thread.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:12 AM
1

So because feminists do it then we should to? Stoop to their level? That's what you're saying? You can't call out feminists on their bullshit tactics then turn around and try to do the same. And I hate to break it to you, but up until the mid 20th century, women absolutely did not share the same rights as men.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:46 PM
9

You're starting to get it. Someone took the 1996 story, changed a few details, and repurposed it. Find me a legitimate source for OPs story. Without any sources, an article like this us as good as fiction.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:20 AM
7

Oh come on, the link OP provided us clearly a reworking of the 1996 case. And that's what makes it so pathetic. Find me a legitimate source for OPs story and I'll concede that you are right.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:17 AM
34

This is a case from 1996. Yes, it's heinous but it's not current either. There is a real problem when we sit around pointing fingers at feminists for sensationalizing and misrepresenting information then turn around and do it to push our own agenda. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-12-22/features/9612220045_1_pay-child-support-child-support-behalf
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:33 PM
2

Maybe you should wait till you can provide complete information before posting on reddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:49 AM
11

I'm on the side of not being a bunch of whiney bitches about every single thing we see.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:38 PM
18

Man, shit like this is why no one takes mens rights seriously. You take a pretty harmless picture and turn it into an attack against men. But yeah, you're probably right, it's a propaganda piece to make fathers look bad. Give me a break.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:27 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:33 PM
0

But it's irrelevant because she is going to jail, she didn't benefit from it. Is the idea here that men never try to make their wife's look bad in a divorce case? This is silly anti-woman shit and the main reason most people don't take men's rights seriously.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:49 AM
-3

How is this a MensRights issue? She isn't getting special treatment or anything. Since when did mens rights become a "stupid things that women do" subreddit?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:39 AM
4

There's really nothing inherently wrong with her doing that. If he's not paying his child support, she takes the hit. When he finally pays there's nothing wrong with her using some of the money on something personal, assuming the kid is being taken care of. However, she should have taken a picture of her kid wearing some new shoes. That would have been a much better fuck you to this guy.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 05:25 AM
24

Man, sometimes there is some great discourse on r/mensrights. Other times it's just a bunch of overreaction and whining, this is one of those times.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:33 PM
0

I'm gonna say this and not bother arguing back and forth after: People do have the right to identify as whatever they want. If she identifies as a woman you should respect that. Not everyone feels comfortable in their own skin, and nature is not perfect. This is not to say that she should be competing with women, but she can identify however the hell she wants. People like you are what give men's rights a bad image. You are the male version of the, i don't give a fuck about anyone, except people…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:39 AM
1

Good video but she was really getting to the meat of the issue at the end. Games have historically been made by men for men. This is starting to change but men are still the majority. You can't blame men for wanting to play male characters, and you can't blame game companies for catering to their consumer. If you really look critically at gender roles in gaming, you would see that in recent years there has been a big move toward giving players the ability to choose the gender of their character.…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:16 AM
10

Well I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess you play video games once and awhile or sit on your ass watching TV, or a movie, etc. I really want to know how you think going to the gym is a worse way to spend an hour than any number of other activities. Maybe you're just being a troll though.
/r/seduction21/03/13 04:48 AM
10

I'm not bashing /r/seduction at all. I used to come here myself. All I'm saying is that when guys aren't good with women, it's not typically the women who are the problem. Guys usually come here with some personality traits that cause them to underperform when it comes to pick up. One of the best things I learned from PU and seduction was that I needed to work on myself.
/r/seduction20/03/13 10:35 PM
31

I want you to explain why weightlifting is an unacceptable pastime and playing video games is an acceptable one. In all seriousness, your attitude toward other people is probably the main reason you've found yourself in /r/seduction
/r/seduction20/03/13 10:07 PM
15

Better ourselves so we can be healthier and live longer, not to mention be more attractive and stronger. I take it you spend every moment of your time trying to be productive? You never play video games, watch movies, tv, read books, or jack off? At least when we are at the gym we are woking toward a goal, it's good for character. When you sit on your ass and play video games (something I enjoy once and awhile myself), you being entirely unproductive. The real problem with society is that people…
/r/seduction20/03/13 10:01 PM
1

Lots of good tips here and it sounds like you (and me both) have to work on conversation. However I have no problem getting a number usually because I don't ask. I confidently tell them to give me their number. Be assertive and confident that she's going to give it to you and she typically will. Hell she might never pick up when you call or way to meet up but the more you do this the more fluid it becomes.
/r/seduction25/07/12 02:44 AM
5

Man good work. I couldn't see myself going to a random party by myself let alone trying it twice. How did you go about asking her to go back to your place? It sounds like she was at least interested, I'm surprised she slapped you and didn't just say no.
/r/seduction18/07/12 08:22 AM
1

Same here. When in my comfort zone with a friend or friends I'm pretty relaxed and we all act like equals. When less familiar people join in all I seem to do is try to qualify myself based on what they are talking about.
/r/seduction18/07/12 08:05 AM
1

As in it's not allowed or if they catch you, you might get in trouble? There really is no way they are going to catch you for downloading an e-book. I got caught for downloading a movie because the production company put a tracker in it. Otherwise I doubt your university is following your data that closely.
/r/seduction17/06/12 01:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter