TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

banksnld Archive

View 1 post and 119 comments by banksnld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

banksnld/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If you want to be taken seriously, I'd say more is needed than a group of pictures of "bad" journalists. Next time, maybe try including some actual facts to make your case.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:41 PM
1

It's funny the things you think you would or wouldn't do IF we had kids. Hell, I thought like that as well before having kids. Then one day I had kids and reality set in.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:28 PM
1

Are you speaking specifically of California? I know here in Michigan, there were quite a few locations where kids were likely to go (inexpensive restaurants or fast food joints, libraries, grocery stores, museums, etc) that had changing tables only in the women's room.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:07 PM
1

Family restrooms are usually the exception, not the rule.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:40 PM
1

Very first thing listed under Overview of mod policy: No advice animals, rage comics, or other low-effort image posts.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:50 PM
1

1) Calling something a meme does not make it so. 2) The quote is using men as a generic for all human beings - so this is just stupid.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:22 PM
0

Some men commit rape --> all men are potential rapists Some women lie about paternity --> all women are potentially lying about paternity Can we agree that neither of these are great ways to view the world?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 10:17 PM
2

and the doctor can requisition the father's records Not in the US; that would be a violation of the father's privacy rights.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 10:11 PM
1

Children are usually seen by a pediatrician, so it's unlikely to be the same doctor.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 10:10 PM
1

if this is the case then they need to have male only hours That really isn't a proper fix - what if the only time someone has to work out happens to coincide with the time set apart for the other gender? About the only thing I could think of is to point out how many people might go elsewhere with their money if the weight room isn't available when they need it because they were trying to make a vocal few happy.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:19 PM
3

When someone takes a single line from a rather lengthy speech, it always makes me wonder what they're ignoring to score points. Here is a bit more context on that speech.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:00 PM
1

How about a guy who climbs all the way to the top of Mt. Everest, then turns around and skis all the way back down?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:04 AM
1

Translated: I want to turn off anyone who might want to work with me to achieve my goals because they don't meet some ideological purity standard that I've decided upon. I'm going to create an artificial division so that we can have in-fighting instead of all just working towards a common goal. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:35 PM
1

I'll be sure to send any grade schoolers I run across in your direction.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:01 AM
2

Well, they can still celebrate Pi Approximation Day on 22 July...
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:22 PM
0

So, it could be the case, but it's not 100%. Not sure how I could have been more clear... he may not have been their father.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:55 PM
1

But what makes the man more horrible than the woman? That's the point we're addressing. That's just the thing - we do not know as of yet what factors played into the difference between the treatment of the two. It makes little sense to call out the judge on this until we know all of the relevant facts.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:52 PM
63

Also, he may not have been their father.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:29 PM
2

I don't believe my area is significantly different from any major metropolitan area in the US in this situation Let me break this down for you once again: 1) Words like "no" or "any" are indicative of a universal; words like "some" or "most" are not. 2) You chose to go with "any", indicating that your statement that is universal to all major metropolitan areas.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:25 PM
2

You're correct. I didn't make a universal statement. Oh really? I don't believe my area is significantly different from any major metropolitan area in the US in this situation Once again, my major metropolitan area is significantly different from your major metropolitan area. Once again, universal disproved by counterexample. But thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:09 PM
2

You've cited no sources yet are deploring me for doing the same? I've cited just as many sources as you; you cited your experiences, I cited mine - which you consistently dismissed and claimed yours as universal. You can state as fact your experiences in your area, as can I about mine. Neither of us can state as a fact how things are everywhere else without providing facts. I at no point attempted to make my experiences universal; you did. Therefore, it would be incumbent upon you to back up wha…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:59 PM
1

I don't believe my area is significantly different from any major metropolitan area in the US in this situation, and that's where homeless congregate. Oh, since you believe it must be true! I thought we were dealing with facts, not your beliefs. It's not. We were discussing homelessness and you suddenly switch to begging; I'd love to see the logic of how it isn't a strawman. You're referring to women you see as ipso facto homeless, without actual knowledge of that fact. No - once again, I'm refe…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:45 PM
2

I can determine that women do not remain homeless for any appreciable period of time. At first approach to a homeless shelter they will get forwarded to permanent assistance. More accurately, you can say it about the homeless in the area that you work. And that's if I give you the benefit of the doubt in regards to your ability to know their situation, something you denied to me. My experience has been different than yours; I'm seeing both genders getting assistance, and both getting help to fin…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:18 PM
2

You wouldn't believe it I have no trouble believing it. But since the original discussion was about whether or not there are homeless women and not whether or not people with homes beg for money, it's meaningless.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:08 PM
2

You can't know that. So let me get this straight: you have the ability to determine, "There are no homeless women," and then you're going to proceed to tell me that I can't tell if people I've been interacting with on a daily basis are really not addicted to drugs, not crazy and homeless? And to top it off, you're going to pretend like you know their situation by adding: Begging at the offramps is a regular "job" that people with homes here do. Oy vey. edit: My mistake on the attribution of the …
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:49 PM
2

Crazy or drug addled. The occasional "purposefully homeless" type (which I largely consider crazy). And yet, they are none of these.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:29 PM
3

There are no homeless women. Um, what? So the actual homeless women I've encountered recently were what, just a figment of my imagination?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:31 PM
1

Where did you get that idea? The first US war involving conscription was the Civil War, and used extensively during both world wars. While there was some conscription during the Revolution, it was haphazard at best, and the national government did not have the power.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:25 AM
1

Good idea in theory, but as it isn't his son that was injured he has no standing to sue.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:16 PM
3

According to the article, it includes interest and penalties. So I'm guessing only a small part is going to be passed along for the kids. edit: fixed a word
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:57 PM
5

Like another article that was posted recently, this one states that the total includes interest and penalties. So I'm guessing that is a huge chunk of the total.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:56 PM
4

He was paying off money that they said he owed for not paying past payments, plus a shitload of surcharges for being in arrears. The majority of what he's been paying are surcharges.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:02 AM
2

I'd say the reply was inappropriate. It could be just an assumption that no men would be interested; there is nothing there saying a man would not be hired.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 01:12 PM
0

Considering how often there are complaints in this sub about feminists ignoring biological differences to push agendas, are we now going to argue that biological differences shouldn't matter?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:25 PM
-4

You realize that you're an adult and that even a condom carries a risk. Or is the goal here to infantalize men?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:15 PM
2

It doesn't sound like he even had a chance to go before a jury, since his lawyer convinced him to plead out.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:39 PM
4

When in reality all dependents are equal and below any actual soldier. The equal to part I can agree with, but below any soldier? That elitist bullshit needs to go away already - I knew quite a few worthless sacks of shit that were serving when I was in, and I highly doubt that has changed.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:17 AM
1

And I am sorry as well; I might be a little thin-skinned right now as I'm involved in a custody dispute with my sons' mother, and was and still am very close to my sons but don't get to see them very often these days.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:42 AM
1

My issue to this is that "great father" makes it sound like an exception to the rule, perpetuating a stereotype that the majority of dads are either disinterested, incompetent, etc to the point that people feel the need to point out when someone is a "great dad." When is the last time you heard someone talk about a "great mom"?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:35 AM
1

little feminist concern troll. This is the shit that pisses me off most about this subreddit. Too often I see people resorting to ad hominem attacks that do nothing but give ammunition to people opposed to MR and even alienate others within the group because they happen to disagree on certain points.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:41 PM
12

CLOTHED CHILDREN ARE NOT CP That's not actually true in the US, any more than pictures of naked children automatically are CP; the Supreme Court has ruled in the past that context does matter, and has held that non-naked pictures used to titillate are obscene.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:15 PM
3

Put it to her plainly and simply, that is worrying because you consider that to be child abuse. Do you really think that basically telling someone they want to abuse their child is going to put them in a mood to listen?
/r/MensRights29/12/11 03:05 PM
3

While I've never been tall, my oldest son is. Just because you're both tall doesn't really mean that much.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 04:31 AM
1

Really? It's impossible, based on what he wrote, that he was merely facing away from her and not in walking away?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:29 PM
0

Most purses have long handles. Swing it in an arc and she could most certainly have been in front of him and still hit the back. When he slammed the door, it could have put him in a position where he was briefly facing away from her. Two possible scenarios that fit the given "facts" that don't have him walking away.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:09 PM
-9

Show me where it says he was walking away.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:56 AM
-15

I'd say it's a little more complicated than that: 1) Big bodybuilder 2) Slams a door right in front of you (a violent act) while yelling obscenities I'd say any reasonable person is going to feel threatened in such a situation. If it had been you, would you have calmly waited to see if he was on some roid rage and about to attack you, or would you try to defend yourself? I'm not saying that is in fact what happened, but it isn't beyond the realm of possibility - especially since the only side of…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 11:40 PM
1

No, I really don't need a more specific term than creepy. Despite your dogged attempts to force a vocabulary of your choice upon me, I am quite free to choose whatever word I want to use.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:16 AM
3

Once again, bullshit. He was creepy, in a there's something seriously wrong with this guy's head way. If it had been a girl doing the same thing, she would also have been creepy as fuck. It could have been a supermodel behaving the same way, and it still would have been creepy as fuck.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:01 AM
1

Bullshit. When someone stares in a similar manner to Michael Emerson in this video and delivers that line with no trace of humor, it's creepy. I was there, you weren't, and this dude creeped us the fuck out.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:00 AM
45

Years back, my buddies & I were hanging out with this girl at a pub. Out of the blue, this guy sits down right next to us & just stares at her. Not occasional glances, but full-on bug-eyed staring for a few minutes. He was weirding all of us out with just that, but then he topped it off by blurting out, "Do you mind if I stalk you?" Care to give me a better term to describe that? Does "creepy" get overused? Sure. But sometimes it's accurate.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:15 PM
8

He was an idiot and should have gotten in trouble. He was an NCO placed in a position of authority over her, and he should have had enough sense to not start a relationship like that.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:12 PM
15

What? A gay man does not have an easier time adopting - except in rare cases like this where he happened to be rich and famous.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:17 AM
2

Unfortunately, corruption seems to run deep in that department - there have even been police chiefs that have been arrested & convicted of wrongdoing in the past.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:42 PM
2

Well, I just googled his name a few minutes ago to see what the latest developments were, and instead found this article from the end of September. It appears he recently filed a lawsuit against some Detroit police officers - and then they just happen to overreact to a traffic infraction involving him? (In case you're wondering if they would have recognized him or not, he's a prominent businessman in that neighborhood - there's a good chance they would know who he is.)
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:15 PM
2

Just ran across this article about a lawsuit involving police officers that puts this thing in a whole new light. He had just filed a lawsuit against some Detroit police officers on the 30th of September, so it makes me wonder if this was done in retaliation.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:11 PM
3

At least in Michigan, bikes are required by law to ride with the direction of traffic if they are on a road. Saying that, I remember having bike safety classes when I was in school that were taught by cops who taught us to ride against the flow of traffic. (It's downright scary sometimes how little they actually know about the laws pertaining to bikes.)
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:03 PM
2

It was in another article I read on it. Of course, that was stated by the guy who was ticketed, so may or not be true.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:00 PM
7

This was nearly 40 years ago, and it was basically a matter of the doctor doing what he thought was best because he was the doctor.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:45 AM
1

Actually, it was a one-way street - but at the time there was no traffic on the road.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:29 AM
8

This actually happened to me; my mom said no and the doctor went ahead with the procedure against her wishes.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:29 AM
3

From the way the article describes it, it sounds like on one hand there was a group of experienced male fireman working together to roll out & hook up a hose to a fire hydrant, and on the other you had an untrained "probie" that was left to her own devices. This strikes me more as a problem of the veteran firefighters letting someone twist. Rather hard to take her failure seriously when it pretty much sounds like they were setting her up to fail.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:47 AM
12

Call me cynical, but I'd also be a bit leery of statistics from a company with an obvious vested interest in convincing more people that they need a paternity test.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 12:05 PM
7

At least in my state (Michigan) if the parents aren't married the mother automatically gets sole custody - you have to go to family court for it to be any other way. They tried to change this back in 2004 with a referendum, but the referendum failed. The biggest argument against it was that it had the potential for abusive boyfriends/fathers to have too much control. (Apparently, a marriage license removes that threat... /sarcasm)
/r/MensRights27/08/11 03:46 AM
3

Here you go. edit: fixed link
/r/MensRights26/08/11 03:59 PM
3

Last I knew, age of consent in Michigan is 15. edit: age of consent in Michigan is 16. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(0inzyt55mjpqki2oaqcm5w55))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-750-520d
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:37 PM
0

IIRC, he's not actually a professor but some guy that works in the fashion industry.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:12 PM
6

He might be referring to a full license; many states have gone to restricted licenses for people under 18.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 01:57 AM
-4

There is no reason to suspect he intended to be with her alone in a lift. You mean beyond the fact that he had ample opportunity to approach her in a group setting and instead waited until she was alone on an elevator to approach her? I'm not saying his attempt wasn't benign - it very well may have been. What I am saying is that saying he just asked her out for coffee because that interpretation fits your viewpoint is something we shouldn't just accept.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:23 PM
-8

He didn't ask her out for coffee; he asked her to come back to her room after cornering her in an elevator at 4 AM.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 04:20 PM
1

Yes - when my son was born, I basically had to turn right around and head back to work, leaving my still-recovering partner home with our son. She'd just gone through four days of labor before delivery, and while we had a couple days in the hospital, it was not enough time for her to be recovered enough to handle everything properly on her own.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:31 AM
2

I'm even more hesitant to believe it since DM is the only showing up on Google News as having reported on this.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:23 PM
2

The attacks now either proven as false flag or highly likely include: 9/11 7/7 London The Alexandria, Egypt church bombing The Mumbai attack The USS Cole attack Car bombings in Iraq (several hundred) Terror attacks in Iran Terror attacks in Pakistan (several hundred) Attacks on American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan (some) Wow...
/r/MensRights12/06/11 03:00 AM
7

Fuck everything about this. It's a public park / playground - it should not be illegal for anyone to be there. I've got two kids, and I don't worry about childless people in the park because I watch my kids while I'm there. Childless people should not have their rights abrogated because parents can't be bothered to watch their kids.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 03:19 AM
3

Since they haven't even been sentenced yet for this to even be an issue over sentencing discrepancies, how is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights07/06/11 04:40 PM
5

Her first name (Nani) is up on the billboard, as the acronym for the group he founded; he's since changed the name of the group on the related website.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:52 AM
-1

That's for teachers overall; if you look at middle and high school, the figures shift significantly to about 35% - 45% of teachers being male.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 02:25 AM
3

1) It's what the husband wanted. 2) It was not removed from his dead body - it was done before he died.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:54 PM
-2

I'll just leave this here. Not that it matters, since you've already provided quotes from him saying that she is entitled to support, so it's pretty obvious that he did, in fact, commit to support her.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:17 AM
-3

Kroeger never agreed to marry this woman, never made a commitment to "support her" Really? You were privy to all of their conversations and know he never made any kind of commitment to support her?
/r/MensRights21/05/11 02:47 AM
9

In that jurisdiction, common-law is married. edit: In British Columbia, a person who has lived and cohabited with another person, for a period of at least two years is considered a common law spouse, unless one or both of them were married to another person during this time, according to the "Estate Administration Act".
/r/MensRights21/05/11 02:39 AM
8

Kroeger, the 38-year-old Nickelback frontman, was in a common-law relationship with Marianna Goriuk for almost seven years before they split up and she moved out in late 2009. Inaccurate title is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 02:06 AM
1

Big fucking deal - kids break shit.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:26 PM
0

Yeah, because she's never done anything beyond elementary school math.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 03:35 AM
8

If Cracked says it, it must be true.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 04:28 PM
0

Good job ignoring the books and movie made about Daniel Pearl that were already pointed out to you. Wouldn't want that getting in the way of your agenda. The Daniel Pearl Foundation was formed by Pearl's family and friends to continue Pearl's mission, and to address what they consider the root causes of his death, in the spirit, style, and principles that shaped Pearl's work and character.[26] Daniel Pearl World Music Days have been held worldwide since 2002, and have promoted over 1,500 concert…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 03:03 PM
0

Wow, a bunch of foreign journalists don't get a lot of coverage in America, but of course it has to be because they are men and have nothing to do with the fact that the American press routinely ignores foreign deaths.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:23 AM
4

Nonsense: The Daniel Pearl Foundation was formed by Pearl's family and friends to continue Pearl's mission, and to address what they consider the root causes of his death, in the spirit, style, and principles that shaped Pearl's work and character.[26] Daniel Pearl World Music Days have been held worldwide since 2002, and have promoted over 1,500 concerts in over 60 countries. Pearl's widow, Mariane Pearl, wrote the memoir A Mighty Heart, which tells the full story of Pearl and more about his li…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 05:52 AM
14

Seriously. I've heard this shit for years, about how men are treated with suspicion / hostility when they go to the park / mall / play center. Yet in the two years I've been doing this with my kids, I haven't seen it happen once.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:44 PM
1

You'd be surprised how screwed up some people's thinking could get. For instance, I read an article that some guy wrote about how women should not breastfeed because a man seeing his wife breastfeeding would be turned off, and that would impinge on the husbands rights and damage the relationship between the parents.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 09:01 AM
1

and how to give lousy blow-jobs. Well, not everyone can have your hard-earned level of expertise in this area.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 09:31 PM
2

I say what i want when I want. I am 5'8" and nearly 200lbs from lifting weights. Most people are smart enough not to disagree with me (face to face at least). Yes, resorting to threats of violence really shows your use of "logic".
/r/MensRights11/04/11 09:29 PM
12

Unless the parents live separately (something never alluded to in the article), she was removed from both parents because of the original issue of the refusal to administer the recommended drugs. This isn't an issue of men's rights - at most it's an issue of parents' rights.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 07:15 AM
1

Yeah, I can see it as well. Because I'm not some little pussy who's afraid of how I'd look.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 07:01 PM
7

Wow, your logic - it's stunning. Tool.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 06:31 PM
2

Wow, people who looked clothed laying under a sheet together - scandalous! If that picture was supposed to strengthen his case, I'm not surprised the prosecution dismissed the case.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 04:42 AM
5

Expecting to be seated because you have a pussy is far more inconsiderate and arrogant than not giving a woman your seat based solely on her gender. I'd say it's not too far a stretch that your rudeness had more to do with how you were treated than your position did.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 02:43 PM
7

Then charge her mom with contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 05:35 PM
1

Wow, basing your response off of a typo... are you really that insecure? I'm going off of first-hand experience, not something I heard from a cousin. My bubble is far from burst.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 03:58 PM
1

And once again - she's working at the administrative level. She has people working for her that are at the operations level.
/r/MensRights04/01/11 08:02 PM
1

Probably because like most agency heads, it's an administrative role - I'd care more about the experience / qualifications of the people working for her. There's enough real shit to worry about.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 06:37 PM
9

The title of the article is "What's Next For 2010's Worst Dudes?" Nice job failing reading comprehension, OP.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 01:59 PM
1

I understand that - my response is that in your exact scenario, should the spouse find out about it their level of trust would probably go down more than yours went up.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 01:24 AM
0

Gain trust? If she had not been cheating & found out her husband was spying on her, I highly doubt there'd be more trust in the relationship.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:35 PM
1

Every state in the union has no-fault divorce - neither party needs a reason to file for divorce.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:33 PM
15

I have to disagree with you on this. If he were more interested in his own needs, he'd have been better served taking the emails to a divorce attorney. Instead, he passed the emails on to someone who could act in the interest of the child.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:27 PM
3

Based on what the article said, it's more of a "he said / she said" situation - he says she had the passwords there & he used the computer, she said only she used the computer & kept the password private. As for the issue of potential physical abuse, the article did not indicate that either. Instead, it was about the child observing the mother getting abused by the ex. Don't get me wrong, it's still f'd up. I just thought it best if we kept with the facts as presented.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:24 PM
0

That was no proposal; that was a demand that people meet his personal requirements.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 04:04 PM
5

What makes you any better at deciding? Show me where I made such an attempt.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:49 AM
10

So MensRights is your personal clubhouse, and you get to decide who's in & who's out?
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:06 PM
1

The difference being that would be an adult, who one would expect to know better.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:01 AM
1

Simply put, the military doesn't want a draft - conscripts, for the most part, do not make good soldiers.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:14 AM
6

You mean like K.C., the A-10 pilot who lost hydraulics over Baghdad & still brought her plane back to base successfully, the first A-10 pilot to ever do so in a combat environment? Or the female troops in supply convoys who can easily end up ambushed or run into an IED? Or the female Air Force Security Forces personnel who provide base defense should it come under attack? Yes, it's true that there are more men in these career fields than women - but it's also most assuredly not true that women i…
/r/MensRights26/11/10 01:49 AM
3

Also, the graffiti wasn't exactly anti-male... it was just a dumb kid doing something stupid.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 02:48 PM
5

No, the true perpetrator of this crime was the father who put his wants above the welfare of his child & killed her.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 01:57 PM
1

I don't disagree that it's unfair; it wasn't like he gave it to her, she grabbed it & ran with it. As for suing her, I'm not sure how much good it would do, really - even if he won, she's probably not going to have any job where she could afford to pay a settlement any time soon.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 02:42 AM
9

He wasn't fired for the rape allegation - he was fired because she damaged his work computer, and they held him responsible since she had access to it through him.
/r/MensRights02/11/10 08:23 PM
2

Perhaps because ideas should be tested? By your argument, we should just leave alone the folks in a hypothetical /r/genocide unless we want to be 100% supportive of their goal to commit genocide.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 09:20 PM
4

Are you really going to argue in favor of an echo chamber?
/r/MensRights11/10/10 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter