| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Judge rules that men can be convicted of rape even if the woman gives consent.Its nice to hear that UK judges are idiots too, not just a US thing. I wish they made our judges wear clown hair too so we knew what to expect in court. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/13 09:46 AM |
| 4 | Quick tl;dr of a century of feminism (a comment found on theatlanticwire)If that women is an English teacher, you are on the list. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/13 02:13 AM |
| 12 | "What is the Women-Owned Small Business program and how can you take advantage?" -- Step 1: Don't be a manThat paragraph stopped me cold too. Wish I was economically disadvantaged, I'd be just fine. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/13 02:18 AM |
| 0 | Don't you just love posting a logical, thought out post criticizing a female's position only to be downvoted into oblivion?You aren't a noob, you know how reddit works. Next time post a cat pic and all will be well. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/12 12:49 AM |
| 23 | Feminist: There won't ever be a male Pill, and it's all because men are irresponsible bastards. P.S. Women worst affected.Why bother? What women is going to buy a guy saying "Hey, don't worry, I'm on the pill". Since the serious negative consequence is theirs, they would be stupid to trust that. However, as a guy, I would to avoid the serious negative consequence of 18 years of child support. Bet your ass I'd be first in line at the DNA test if I was on it. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/11 06:34 AM |
| 4 | Man sent to prison 36 years ago for rape/robbery. DNA evidence, tested decades later, showed another man's DNA on the victims' clothing. Court said that was not enough to overturn conviction. WTF?as DitkasMoustache mentioned, the letter of the law is used more than the actual guilt or innocence to obtain convictions in the current environment. There are more innocent people in prison than you might want to think. Think plea bargain, which is 90% of our convictions. No 12 angry men, just apparently corrupt prosecutors and judges looking to the next election. You know, hard on crime, even if its imaginary. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 07:13 AM |
| 1 | Man sent to prison 36 years ago for rape/robbery. DNA evidence, tested decades later, showed another man's DNA on the victims' clothing. Court said that was not enough to overturn conviction. WTF?I want to say it happened, but can't find the case. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 07:04 AM |
| 19 | Man sent to prison 36 years ago for rape/robbery. DNA evidence, tested decades later, showed another man's DNA on the victims' clothing. Court said that was not enough to overturn conviction. WTF?Better than that, a supreme court opinion allows the execution of people who are factually innocent as long as the appeals process is exhausted prior to exoneration. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/11 03:37 AM |
| 5 | How the hell does alimony work? What exactly is it? what's the purpose and how does the law take sides in its case?Its meant to act as severance pay for the full time homemaker and mother with no real current life skills. The theory is that the women couldn't ever make it on her own. I think it should end with the majority of the kids personally, but the courts apparently see it different. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/11 07:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter