TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

barkmagician Archive

View 6 posts and 522 comments by barkmagician on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

step 1 - women vote liberal policies that let violent thugs walk out step 2 - women feel unsafe step 3 - women blame men who tried to warn them against liberal polcies
/r/MensRights02/05/26 09:47 PM
1

if i build a slightly rightwing forum would you guys join in it?
/r/MensRights21/03/26 03:43 PM
48

step 1 - women complain about the bodycount double standard step 2 - shame men who have low bodycount
/r/MensRights08/03/26 11:57 PM
1

incel = anyone who dares to disagree with a liberal woman sorry the power of that word expired long time ago
/r/MensRights08/03/26 11:53 PM
1

No you wont. Female suicide rate might be higher than male but the success rate is low because you do it for attention.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 10:03 PM
1

redpill is really just a collection of shared notes. its not a movement. its up to you if you want to use what you learned from those notes for good or for evil.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 04:27 AM
14

based on what i observed from my cousins. the only ones of my cousins who became incels are the ones who grew up in singlemother homes. my personal take, and cmiiw, these boys grew up believing women are angels capable of unconditional romantic love as long as you are a gentleman.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:13 PM
1

do a purely ceremonial wedding. hire a lawyer for her to change lastname.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 01:51 PM
1

I have zero crime record yes. That means im outside the group who commit crime. Which part did you miss?
/r/MensRights13/02/26 05:00 AM
1

then feel free to do a subcategory of your own. you will never arrive to an answer if you are too afraid to offend people. and yes i have zero crime track so technically i am outside of that group.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 02:34 AM
12

statistics without categorization is dishonest statistics. which group of men?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 05:53 AM
1

just google "dear john letter"
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:01 PM
5

wait what???
/r/MensRights14/11/25 12:58 PM
148

The government is not worried about society. They are worried about the declining number of taxpayers.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:42 PM
23

Yes 100%. And I say that as a happily married man. (In my case she has been my girlfriend for 7 years before we got married). Are all women going to betray their marriage? No. Are they allowed to betray their marriage without consequences? Yes. All of them have that option.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 02:20 PM
13

I would assume they all have the ability to walk away and choose regular jobs
/r/MensRights18/10/25 02:09 PM
49

This was actually explained very well by hoemath. A mans most reliable asset is his ability to make resources. A womans best asset is her "image". Image in this context is not limitesd to her physical beauty but also her reputational beauty. Meaning a woman(not all but very common), a woman will say things that will improve her public image even if she doesnt believe her own words.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:33 AM
3

The word "hate" is overused by liberals and feminists.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:11 PM
27

Because nobody wants to be drafted. It just so happens that mens voice in general are dismissed in the political world.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 02:04 PM
4

It simply means that the man she loves is engaged/married to someone else
/r/MensRights08/10/25 06:52 PM
2

Men are not the ones wearing wedgie shorts in the gym. Men are not the ones showing half of their ballsack in public and bending over for instagram pictures.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 06:37 PM
4

Give it 15 years. Millennial men are the generation that MOSTLY never awakened. Gen-z are the ones who woke up during their teenhood And Gen-z will raise their sons to be redpilled by default
/r/MensRights01/10/25 07:01 PM
1

Whether you like it or not, men and women value different things. The same reason why most women hold men to a specific income standard and most men dont put any of that standard on women. No I dont have an issue with that, in fact I dont care how you raise your kids.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 12:36 AM
1

Nobody said anything about "deciding". You talk to someone about a topic, then let the listener decide.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 12:26 AM
1

Fathers used to warn their daughters all the time to stay away from sexually hedonistic young men. We stopped doing that because feminism said fathers should not be "control freaks" and that women deserve sexual liberation. We literally have a moral standard for that, feminism got rid of it.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 03:21 PM
4

Thats totally up to women. Women arent rejecting men with high bodycount.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:46 PM
15

Because men have the right to discuss it and its key indicator for protecting mens mental health.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:44 PM
3

If you read the post carefully, nobody said its wrong to not want kids. Im simply questioning this media propaganda painting men creatures who dont kids.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:35 PM
1

So if there's one parent in this scenario who might not want the child, it's almost always going to be the man, simply because he never had a say it it to begin with. and yet majority of posts from /r/childree are women
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:32 PM
5

True and I support what you are preaching. What I dont support is the over representation in media how "men dont want kids hurdur" when there is vastly more women who dont want kids than men.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 07:37 PM
13

Like how tailor swift protect the environment with her private jets?
/r/MensRights11/05/25 04:30 AM
9

Because theyd get cancelled and ridiculed by the media
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:33 PM
7

They attempt it more because more of them do it for attention. Dont get me wrong some males do it for attention too, but most males do it with deletion as the goal.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:31 PM
5

Men already tried that. They observed the real world and shared what they observed and they got accused of being "redpill" or "incel".
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:31 PM
21

Society will pressure you to raise your son to be a nice gentleman but that same society will spit at your son's face and tell him he is not owed anything for being nice
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:09 PM
20

How would you feel if a whole restaurant suddenly saw your ding dong
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/25 10:28 AM
110

nurturing gender strikes again
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:30 PM
7

Do you also think... Feminists dont think
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:44 PM
2

Then feel free to prove me wrong lol
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:23 PM
2

Well my cousin's mom got custody him. Yeah I can play made up anecdotes as well.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:19 PM
4

Most of the time tho.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:11 PM
7

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2018/02/27/of_27_deadliest_mass_shooters_26_of_them_were_fatherless_435596.html Boom hahaha
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:11 PM
5

Nope. The biased family court gives custody and house to the wife by default.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:10 PM
6

Divorced parents. Aka singlemom households.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:01 PM
6

Yeah. The Sons of single moms lol.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:54 PM
5

And not every shooter is an incel. Yeah i can play "but but some" too.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:50 PM
7

Yeah. The ones raised by single moms.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:45 PM
4

And some of them are not incels.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:41 PM
7

And who raised them? Thats right. Single moms 🤣
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:29 PM
10

Do feminists rallies exists? Yes. Do incel rallies exists? No. Congratulations. You just proved the OPs point 🤣
/r/MensRights24/01/25 12:59 PM
9

Because the word lost its meaning. Now its just "you disagreed with me therefor you are incel".
/r/MensRights24/01/25 12:57 PM
3

Most AI are trained using reddit data. A LEFTIST platform.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 02:05 AM
2

If they are truly concerned about the categorization, then challenge them to categorize by gender + ethnicity of the crime rate instead of just gender.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 04:10 AM
1

most 16 girls would happily make out with an adult chad from holywood. that doesnt make it justified just because "she likes it". its still objectively wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 05:45 AM
1

the only reason why its a "bad" thing is because fewer children means fewer future taxpayers, which means less money to fund the senator's new ferrari
/r/MensRights24/07/24 05:43 AM
1

They miss being the "highschool campus crush" so they are trying to relive those moments by sleeping with students. AKA a classic case of main character syndrome. Like most modern women and feminists do.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 05:49 PM
4

women are happier single more reason for men to not get married then
/r/MensRights20/04/24 08:49 AM
16

It is setup by men in order to protect and serve women
/r/MensRights20/04/24 08:47 AM
5

Because its technically true. I hate it as much as you do but it is what it is. Society will never run out of men as long as there are lots of women around. Even If 50 men in a village commit self-deletion, the village can easily replace those men as long as there are 80-100 women around who can give birth.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:37 PM
3

W......T......F!
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:20 PM
8

u/Ok-Price556 are we hiding now?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:31 PM
18

I dont agree with them deleting themselves but I totally understand. Loneliness and depression is like a regular Tuesday for the average men. So Im guessing self deletion has an objectively understandable cause.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 02:02 PM
3

masculinity to according these women goes like "you either agree with my own personal made up rules or else you are misogynist and not a real man"
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:01 PM
2

its not even a movement
/r/MensRights31/03/24 02:59 AM
0

i cant finish with rubbers on
/r/MensRights31/03/24 02:58 AM
1

Okay then. You wanna play "its a fact because I said so. I just looked at my magic crystal ball and it says you are wrong. Women will not be forced to have kids.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:52 PM
3

this theory will become a fact Says who? Says you? Prove it. Get me a time machine so we can see the future. China & Japan are making policies to pay people to reproduce more than 1 child, to prevent that from happening, They are being paid to it OPTIONALLY. Nobody is forcing them. its not a mandatory policy.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:57 PM
2

People need to stop with this excuse read his comment This doesn’t excuse any negative actions by anyone He is simply stating the "why". He never used it as an excuse
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:46 PM
1

Just so he can do whatever he wants to her, including things she isn't okay with it. Isn't manipulative and predatory according to you She CHOSE to say YES in the marriage proposal and She GAINS access to his financial resources. The girl is the one doing the manipulation. Stop using being broke as an excuse to manipulate men. Then a rich guy is also not getting manipulated. When a girl divorces him and takes half his stuff when that were her intentions. There you go, you are not using your B-wo…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:31 PM
1

I know people who make good money and yet they still needed years to leave their abusive partners. Tag them here
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:26 PM
2

so is that a fact or just a theory of the future?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:25 PM
3

and when the population declines, the females will be put out of jobs & careers, to reproduce in bulk again (like in the previous centuries) population is already declining sweetheart. nobody here is forcing you to have a baby.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:31 PM
1

Nah that isn't manipulation Yes it is. She tricked him into thinking she is inlove with him. And people divorce all the time. So of course it isn't predatory. Drug dealing happens all the. Again, use the B-word inside your skull.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:02 PM
1

So women aren't allowed to divorce someone I never said that. You are just news anchoring at this point. AKA the class "so youre saying...." Men divorce women all the time and vice versa I don't see the issue See this is what happens when empty pumpkins open reddit without doing prior research. 80% of divorce are initiated by women. The guy knew the risks when he married her Here is the key difference. He married for love. She married for money. And manipulated him into thinking she loves him. M…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:55 PM
1

And in cases of marrying up and ending in divorce. Which one loses half their bank account most of the time?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:47 PM
1

how is a woman divorcing a rich man predatory How is it not predatory?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:43 PM
1

You said that they can get a job. I responded to that insanely delusional take. Nope. Broke men do it all the time. And they never have to manipulate rich women into it.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:17 PM
1

Men can be just as psychologically abusive as women Agree If he additionally gaslights the woman into thinking that she can never make it without him Agree. And same goes for women. They can also gaslight men into thinking he can never make it without her. then from a *financial* perspective, she cannot just leave And yes. She can leave, she can call the police if the husband stops her.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:09 PM
3

Can't be manipulated into a relationship where they get treated badly They cant. Because like I said. They have the option to say No. If you dont want that guy, then dont marry that guy. Because those men prayed on them with bad intentions Having a relationship with a broke woman is "bad intention"? What about those woman whose only intention is to gain financial access? Is that considered "good intention"? And are in a position where they get thrown back on the streets with nothing Broke men do…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:06 PM
2

Buddy fucking respond to the rest of what I said you are focusing on something trivial Which one in particular. Because you wrote a whole lot of essays without actually addressing a single issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:00 PM
22

Men are shamed for not wanting to marry 304s. Men are shamed for not wanting to marry single moms. Men are shamed for not wanting unattractive women. Men are shamed for not wanting to marry without prenup. Because men being careful and wary about marriage causes a decline in population (its happening now). Declining population > less future taxpayers > less money to fund the governor's new sports car.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:58 PM
2

well then lets ask the OP himself u/Plus-Pollution-5916 does your topic include marriage?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:48 PM
3

Pffft how is that abuse those men can just say no. According to you that is very easily said atleast in every situation. See you are not using your B-word again. These men did not marry these broke woman with divorce in mind. They agreed to the marriage. They never agreed to the assets takeover. if the guy says no He cant say no. If the woman gets bored and files for a divorce, he has no choice but to give up half his assets. Thats what it means to have no choice. You example of saying a woman g…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:46 PM
2

The conversation of marriage isn't even applied Actually he did. Its a subset of his topic titled "Why a rich man will change a broke woman's life" Buddy you are delusional Agree. Looking at facts and reality is "delusional".
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:41 PM
3

Yes abusing someone and throwing them on the street Agree. These women abuse their husbands hard-earned money, then file for divorce to take their houses and throw these men out of the streets. Very manipulative.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:35 PM
3

Why didn't I think of that. Because you dont use whats inside your skull. It starts with a B. Your excuse was that broke women marry rich men for the money because "they have no means"Well broke men also exists, and they dont use that as an excuse.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:32 PM
3

And it also is not nearly as bad It happens very often. And it is as bad. The feminist in the video confirmed it. She did her research and she has the stat sheets to prove it. All you have is hearsay from your school.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:27 PM
3

But no means to be released into the wild with no money Yes. Yes they have means. They can get a job. Broke men do it all the time, without marrying rich women. This is beyond predatorial Agree. These women are predatorial.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:26 PM
3

But this happens way less It happens WAAAAAY to often actually.Even a feminist(one of the film's researchers) confirmed it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7MkSpJk5tM
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:22 PM
3

They do it because they are easy pray They are not easy pray. They have the option to say no. Which is in a lot of situations really not in the best interest of those women And again. They have the option to say.....NO. It's the same as going to a bar, finding a drunk guy on a table and confincing him to sign a contract Exactly. Its the same when you find a lonely guy who happens to have money and is in a vulnerable situation. You marry him to gain financial access without actually loving him. M…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:19 PM
2

Adults can be manipulated Agree. Adult woman marries a rich man. Then files for divorce and gain half his assets. Peak manipulation.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:13 PM
5

But she can't leave because she is financially dependent She CAN leave. She just wont. So Thank you. You just confirmed the woman in question is the one doing the manipulation. Broke men are able to get by without having to marry a rich woman. Broke women have no excuses on this topic.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:10 PM
6

woman marries a man she doesnt love in order to gain financial access............man is somehow the "manipulator". logic doesnt work against these feminitards.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:03 PM
4

Most of those men use their money in this situation extremely manipulatively Giving a woman access to your hard earned money is manipulation...............right. And yet women who GAIN access to a rich man's money is somehow the "victim" of manipulation. They basically use their money to get with desperate women If these women are "desperate" for money, nothing stops them from getting a job.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:36 PM
57

why society has never paid(men in particular) attention to this? Because back in the old days, an average man who goes to college and works hard is guaranteed to not be broke. Hardwork WAS the road to success. The problem - we adapted this mindset in modern world. Internally, both men and mostly women, assume that men who are broke are simply "lazy". Nowadays, you can work as hard as a slave but if you dont excel at something, no company would ever look at you. Half the time, even people with a …
/r/MensRights27/03/24 01:45 PM
23

Nah. Plenty of average men are willing to marry fat chicks. BROKE FAT CHICKS. There is no excuse aside from being choosy (which is fine, but dont complain about being "lonely")
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:01 AM
-13

troll post
/r/MensRights26/03/24 08:45 PM
583

fears about being alone forever for the average men this is called "Tuesday"
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:53 PM
2

what. the. fuck?????? u think these teachers are not?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:16 AM
1

they miss being the campus crush back in their highschool days so now they are trying to get that feeling back from students.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 11:10 AM
8

w that logic drug dealers shouldnt be arrested and buyers should be blamed
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:38 AM
45

men have a higher "sadness tolerance meter". but we do cry. usually it involves a death of a close friend or family. or something really really sad. things like loneliness or depression is like tuesday to us.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:02 AM
56

"it is never out fault"
/r/MensRights25/03/24 11:17 PM
7

u/nova_dova
/r/MensRights25/03/24 10:42 PM
13

did you even read the article or did you just go to google just so you can have something to paste? its full of opinions made from writer's feelings instead of actual laws. e.g The power of men to decide what the world is going to look like, what counts and what doesn't, hasn't really been terribly disrupted in a generation EDIT: Actually I'm gonna bet you didnt read it since you literally pasted a site with dozens of popup ads. now answer the question. what are These rights i have but women don…
/r/MensRights25/03/24 09:30 PM
6

lets tag the 1d1ot just in case u/nova_dova
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:21 PM
14

Nah. Its sadder than you think the opposite. Get more help bud.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:10 PM
12

What good would I gain from **harming** my brothers and friends For the record I never used the word "harm". (You are just news anchoring, aka the class "so youre saying.....") But I will tell you a few benefits of being a female that will put men in disadvantage.A wife can cheat on her man and still get custody of the kids + child support. A wife can decide she is bored of the marriage, file a divroce and still get half of the husband's assets. A drunk man and a drunk woman can hook up and the …
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:09 PM
11

Oh brother. What makes you think quality women and going to go for the bottom on the barrel bud? My wife did. When I proposed to her I had nothing. I was living in my parent's house and still struggling to find a job. I was the typical average loser. The man in the bottom barrel. I now earn close to 6figs and I will reward my wife with everything I can since she is a "quality woman".
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:59 PM
20

I only see positive things coming from feminism because those things benefit you. COMMON SENSE.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:54 PM
3

so i think its pretty fair for me to assume he’s talking about me uhmmm no. the question you stated: You guys need to wake up and realize feminists are not “against men” you were specifically mentioning the f group. so im sure you are smart enough to deduce that we would address the question to the group.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:52 PM
16

Do you genuinely believe 61% of women in america HATE men? Because that sounds pretty unrealistic to me Sounds pretty realistic tbh
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:41 PM
9

For the record, I never said its specifically you. when I say you it means the you (the f group) And if women were only dating rich tall super attractive men, dont you think our population would be going down? 🤣 POPULATION IS DECLINING! Gawd do some research before touching your phone.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:36 PM
27

Also who created the draft again? A man. Thank you!. You just disproved the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:15 PM
10

feminists are not “against men” you mean like how they accuse "men in the past were fking like pigs"? mr right who was tall/handsome/famous/wealthy - the typical attributes of the usual playboy. a very thin percentage of men. less than 20%. your "mr right" pumped and ghosted you. and yet somehow you accused majority of men for being "pigs".
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:14 PM
3

rule1. it is never their fault.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:53 PM
0

They inflate numbers by inserting cases which don't belong in that category to justify their claims You are just repeating yourself by trying to hide it in a different word salad so Im gonna answer you the same thing. Raw data can be cleaned up and preprocessed to extract outliers and "false" correlation. Its literally the reason why "pay gap" has been debunked a million times. I'll give you an example. Here, in Spain, feminists inflate the numbers of cases of what they call "machista" violence.…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:24 PM
2

Numbers are not that accurate So are feelings. There is a reason why majority of feminists think "men in the past also acted like pigs". Without giving an ounce of thought that only the playboys are doing this, aka a very thin slice of men. The men ignored and rejected by society, aka the average guys dont have this kind of behavior. Numbers are objective, feelings are not. So no, thank you. I will stick with numbers. Numbers, if we assume that they are accurate and not biased Which is why we li…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 03:44 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/12r7qi7/d\_new\_reddit\_api\_terms\_effectively\_bans\_all\_use/?rdt=49694
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:21 PM
16

makes sense. one of GPT's main source of training data is reddit (a very left leaning platform).
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:21 PM
1

Most men choose the woman Nope. Man can select who they ask out, but cant choose who says "yes".
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:02 PM
0

yeah I agree. because "feelings" are more accurate than numbers.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:59 PM
2

BINGO!
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:10 PM
1

thats rich coming from you who said I am from one of these countries and i can tell you that the ones who choose that are in the same position as men who "choose" to do dangerous work or starve so women from third world countries HAVE TO marry passport bros or else they will starve? GTFO. We are living in the era of empowered women. Any women who chooses to marry a pssport bro did so on their own accord. Nobody is forcing them. They are free to get a job if they want. So its not really "exploita…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:09 PM
1

but women trade in their bodies and their autonomy again. thats not what they are feeling. Plenty of these women have already confirmed this. these women are HAPPY marrying a passport bro. so who are you to decide that they are being "exploited"? Your logic literally translates "these women have to agree with my opinioin or else they are just exploited". source: I was born and raised in Philippines (and yes I am filipino and I support passport bros)
/r/MensRights22/03/24 06:59 PM
-8

up up up
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:38 PM
11

every man does at this point
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:03 PM
1

makes sense
/r/MensRights05/03/24 09:51 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1aj433n/incels\_myth\_vs\_reality/
/r/MensRights05/03/24 03:02 AM
7

There might actually be a pay gap in the fashion industry. Female models in general earn more than male models. Tho Im not sure if its a skill issue or hours of work issue? I dont know. So for now I'll refrain from creating baseless conclusions. But its an area worth looking deeper into. (Or maybe someone from fashion industry can correct me since I'm also curious on the actual number)
/r/MensRights05/03/24 02:54 AM
18

Assuming she is accusing someone of being the father, it would be paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 12:43 AM
16

but quickly died down because the main media silenced it. every public figure of MRA so far has been either cancelled or falsely accused to the point where they have to somewhat lay low.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 09:22 PM
1

Catch n°1 they also kill men for adultery good Catch n°2 they don't acknowledge male rape victims of women dang. yeah that part needs to be corrected.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:13 PM
3

feminists like to claim that they do it to support each other when the truth is youve never seen a feminist catch a bullet for her bff - a feat men have proven to do multiple times
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:59 PM
5

because we are disposable. is it justified? no. do I agree with it? obviously not. but its just the reality. society can create as many men as they want as long as there are lots of women around. there is a reason why artificial wombs research gets a lot of pushback. society is too afraid to see that men in general are capable of both fatherhood and motherhood.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:56 PM
3

Height is obviously an advantage in the dating world but it’s not everything its not everything but majority of the time it does create an impact to everything like a domino effect. yes you can have talent/charisma/career, but so do the taller guys and majority of the time, they are the ones who get noticed first and therefor given the opportunity to go first.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:39 PM
1

not really. most men have the mindset of "leave me alone while i enjoy the fruits of my labor". are there men who seek social approval? yes. do most men seek for it? i dont think so.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:35 PM
7

makes sense tbh. men brag about the woman they love. woman love the man they can brag.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:33 PM
2

so whats the catch?
/r/MensRights24/02/24 10:04 PM
138

Because the men that they want have high beauty standards. The guys who look like shrek are more than happy to marry the women who look like fiona. The women who look like fiona think they are settling with guys who look like shrek.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 04:38 PM
1

we all do......in an ideal world
/r/MensRights23/02/24 10:05 AM
5

its easy to recommend marriage if you know you can financially survive a divorce
/r/MensRights20/02/24 11:52 PM
109

women are getting desperate no they are not. for every man going mgtow there is at least 10 simps willing to save a lonely modern woman
/r/MensRights20/02/24 11:25 PM
1

Alexander Grace and Melanie King comes into mind.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:27 PM
95

because men and women have never been equal. women have and always been the sex that received the "baby treatment".
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:43 PM
1

they have their freedom of speech. i have mine.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:40 PM
40

"the right for doing whatever i want without being held accountable from it"
/r/MensRights20/02/24 03:29 AM
1

"never marry a woman who already gave her first petal to another man" -my grandmas advice by the way. ive been married 5 years to a woman who has been my girlfriend for 8 years prior to marriage. NO RAGRETS.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:51 AM
1

the number of total users is not equal to the number of active users
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:49 AM
1

Same here dude. I was born and raised in the east. I can attest even eastern men dont want western women.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:39 AM
2

It's because women don't want other women to be exploited Whoever gains financial benefit in a transaction is the exploiter, so its not the men. These women overseas are more than happy to marry this men and none of them are claiming being exploited. So who are you to dictate what these women are feeling? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MOny1DJlPcM
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:35 AM
4

but it’s clear that you’ve been hurt by a woman or women rejecting you, the fact that "hurt" is your first assumption means you are the one feeling hurt
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:28 AM
2

"the men they dont want" AKA Mr. Backup in case chad wont lock me in
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:26 AM
2

Who are all these 47% of dudes saying it’s ok for women to cheat men who married 304s and trying their best to cope about it
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:22 AM
3

dad does not have to sign the birth certificate to agree to parentage yeah because cheating wives are known to automatically confess about paternity fraud from the moment they get pregnant. right??????
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:21 AM
1

altho I would say they are equally wrong. dont ignore the fact that in addition to the feeling of betrayal, men also feel emasculated. also, if the husband cheats, the whole town would feel sorry for the wife. but if the wife cheats, half the town will feel sorry for the husband while the other half will ridicule him about how he got "cucked".
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:19 AM
46

dont make a big deal out of it. libtards will add a label to anyone who disagrees with them. misogynist/racist/bigot/homophobe/nazi. these are all just buzzwords nowadays and simply lost their true meaning.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:13 AM
1

facts dont matter to feminists
/r/MensRights18/02/24 02:18 AM
1

objectifying the woman as a 'used fleshlight' nope. you are the one doing that. im simply comparing fleshlight to a vagina. you are the one comparing fleshlight to a woman.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:34 AM
1

But women would also refuse used dildos so it would prove nothing about men specifically. Actually no. You are trying to disprove apple being apple by proving orange is orange. Women refusing used dildos does NOT prove that men prefer women who have a high bodycount.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:26 AM
2

adding to this. women have the freedom to reject playboys and chads. its not men's fault that most women would chase chads. the whole "its unfair coz a man's bodycount doesnt matter" argument is entirely moot since its not men who decided that. its women who decided that they are okay sleeping with playboys and chads. women decided its okay for men to rack up bodycount.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:13 AM
1

I couldn't find a reference to the Fleshlight experiment via search engine Im telling you to conduct a fleshlight experiment. Hence I specifically used "men WILL refuse" instead of "men refused".
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:07 AM
1

because they are pushing this belief that the average joe sleeps with different women every weekend.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 12:49 AM
2

Why is reddit like this and why is it allowed Because reddit wouldnt earn squat if women started a "boycott reddit" movement.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:18 PM
3

The honest answer? women can easily replace their husband/boyfriend with a single tap on the phone. If my vacuum doesnt work the way I want and its free to get a new one, Id probably just go get a new one.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:25 AM
2

well then by all means. explain it to us oh wise guru.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:32 PM
4

if he was a populist then he would use twitter/x to appeal to the woke
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:56 AM
2

not if the clock has a date
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:55 AM
182

I remember back in college(comp sci) I've always been able to meet every deadline in lab exercises able to check every boxes in the requirements. A LOT of girls in my class would get almost the same marks as me despite being 3 days late behind those course works and the instructors were much more forgiving when they are missing 1 or 2 requirements. No guy in my class ever got this kind of special treatment. Its either go hard or go home for us.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:49 PM
1

tnx
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:53 AM
14

technically it means "wants sex but cant get sex" (involuntary)
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:23 AM
5

you make your own luck trust me i really want to believe that is true but i know of several people who work harder than me and smarter than me but still dont make as much as i do. but i do agree with your points that in order for luck to be effective then hard work needs to be involved. opportunity is the road to success and hardwork keeps the opportunity alive You can’t be online hating women Replace the word "you" with "guys" because reading your comment people might assume that you are saying…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:19 AM
10

I am sure I will get downvoted heavily nono. you make very good points and you have my upvote. Red pill info is not all negative true. i never said "repill bad" and i specifically mentioned the radical ones. aka the ones saying "there are no good woman" so do the work and make yourself a more attractive, approachable man who has his life and affairs in order been there done that. happily married 5 years to a woman who has been my girlfriend for 8 years prior to marriage. but lately it’s only a p…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:57 AM
4

id vouch they acknowledge themselves as incels. some of them might not be aware of the term but they def know that they are undesireable. as for the crazy ones, ive never seen a redpilled incel admit to it. these are people who identify as alphas but dont even know how to grill a brisket.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 01:48 AM
7

thats because the mentally stable incels dont usually watch redpill videos and threads. the redpillers who make up the minority of incels are also the loudest.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 01:33 AM
81

And feminitards be like: "the wnba makes less than the nba because of the patriarchy" Feminist, you can fix that by supporting the wnba. Buy their merch and game tickets.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 12:33 AM
2

Because you can create as many men as you want as long as you have lots of women around. Everyone knows we are disposable. Sadly we just dont have leverage atm.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:59 PM
9

most avg woman with a failed degree-related career can fallback as a housewife. its a good gamble for women. most avg men with a failed degree-related career dont have that option. its a bad gamble for men.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:29 AM
6

It's like a class B misdemeanor And the same gets charged to the buyer hopefully?
/r/MensRights01/02/24 12:16 AM
135

i just realized while reading your post: drug dealing = dealer gets arrested smuggling = smuggler gets arrested counterfeit = counterfeiter gets arrested ​ ​ prostitution = prostitute gets rescued and goes to rehab. buyer gets arrested. at least in most countries
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:50 PM
29

brainwashing men "brainwashing". the left will use this term to ANYONE who disagrees with their view. they cannot fathom the possibility that people are allowed to fact-check and have a different opinion. feminists will use this term against muslim women. the moment a muslim woman says "i am wearing my hijab on my own accord" or "i want to dress in a modest manner". they will label that woman as "brainwashed". do you know how degrading is that? they believe muslim women dont have the capacity to…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:40 PM
12

single and childless didnt you watch the taktak videos? they like being single and childless. its "empowering".
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:59 PM
14

ok relax. we are reaching fanfiction territory now.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:31 PM
40

I haven't even taken a paternity test, and tbh I dont want to. Take the test. Thats your step1 for this problem.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 04:39 AM
181

The funniest thing of all is they act like you’re an immoral person for not watching women’s sports. You know whats funnier? The WNBA would have been as successful as the NBA if feminists actually started paying for wnba merch and tickets.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:40 AM
17

thats just your meds making you hallucinate. nobody wants you dear. next time go deal with your frustration the natural way....the non-prescription way.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 12:02 AM
13

Girl no one attacked him or you yeah a good way to convince someone you are not attacking them is by........following them on other subs. congratulations you living contradiction. I know of a boy who snuck into his new girlfriends house one night because her parent's were controlling any chance you can tag this boy in this thread so we can confirm? we just said being 21 and 30 is a bit of a gap considering your social isolation and your Cerebral Palsy that requires a wheelchair you make it sound…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:52 PM
23

she means like a support group/organization
/r/MensRights30/01/24 07:48 PM
3

exactly. hed be called a "control freak".
/r/MensRights30/01/24 02:05 AM
7

Thats some solid argument there but thats ok. You have the freedom to live in your own reality.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:30 AM
2

or anyone else who would want me to sacrifice my dreams for them I never said anything about being with anyone who wants you to sacrifice your career. Nor do I encourage that. Im simply pointing out, that in your eyes, your 2nd husband was not a man who YOU deem worthy of sacrificing your career for.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:54 PM
2

My first husband, I just didn’t want him to be abusive he didn’t want to be different first of all im sorry to hear that he is abusive. Husband 2 and I had different career paths that neither wanted to sacrifice You "not willing to sacrifice" argument falls short cause I doubt youd do the same if you were married to someone like Bradd Pitt or Elon Musk (hypothetically ofcourse). Which further proves the point of him not being the man you want. Im not saying you should have given up on your caree…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:31 PM
1

Not at all- I wanted all my husbands keyword "wanted". you dont want them now. you became unhappy with them longterm. these were never the men that you wanted to tie the knot with the idea of "till death do us part". These are men that you dont want. My skills and characteristics are a good buff for anyone driven to be successful These are qualities that a guy can also find in a business partner. These are not a unique quality of a wife. They do help yes. But in general, these are not the qualit…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:44 PM
2

men are pigs /s
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:43 PM
21

Correct 100%. This is the same reason why the feminist claim to "its unfair because a man's bodycount doesnt matter" is moot. Because who decided that a man's bodycount doesnt matter? women decided that. The only reason why a man's bodycount doesnt matter as much as a woman, is because women in general refuse to reject the men with high bodycount. It is not men's fault that women are rewarding playboys and chads.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:32 PM
6

Facts. Because people want to do sht but without the consequences. (aka these people dont want to be held accountable) There is a reason why we shame men who get laid by paying for hookers.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:22 PM
8

False. A father (who is not insane) would be against the idea of their daughters forming a relationship or marrying a playboy.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:20 PM
4

the male equivalent of a slut would be men who constantly pay for prostitutes. the average man does not have easy access to sex the same way an average woman does. the only the time this ever happens is through prostitution.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:17 PM
5

equally shameful for the mother/sister/daughter. also a daughter is more likely to display rebellious behavior if she grows up around a father who constantly brings different women every weekend.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:14 PM
5

actually no. you just proved my point. which is the man that you want youve been married 4 times which means youve been marrying the guys that you didnt want. and in your point regarding cooking and making. There is a reason why I specifically mentioned the word "maybe". Maybe skills in cooking and homemaking yes but if you are talking about career skills then no, men mostly dont care about that.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:38 PM
8

equal treatment feels like discrimination to them?
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:26 PM
2

Character, skills, resources, those sorts of things. You mentioned about being an older women in the dating scene so clearly you have some level of choosiness in you - and that is fine. You are completely justified to be choosy. But I willl tell you straight to the point, the man that you want doesnt care for your skills and resources. Maybe skills in cooking and homemaking yes but if you are talking about career skills then no, men mostly dont care about that. ...Youth is potential ...the only …
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:23 PM
21

The thing about slut shaming is it doesnt really target the sluts. No slut in history of mankind ever felt shameful for being a slut. What do you think goes in their head? "Oh yeah they called me a slut maybe I should stop fcking around". No that never happens. The people who do feel ashamed are male family members of that slut. any brother would be ashamed of a slut sister any son would be ashamed of a slut mother any father would be ashamed of a slut daughter any husband would be ashamed of a …
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:43 PM
0

mra people are doing that already. especially against those toxic redpill stuff. not to say that redpill is bad but the modern ones are extremely toxic. and they are filled with alpha-males who probably say "ew" when they touch a worm on a fishing hook.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:14 PM
2

Wouldn’t it still be a problem that… they aren’t women men masturbate using their hands and those hands aint women. What about these would make a difference Not much. Its more like a highly advanced flesh light. What negative impacts would it have on men to prefer these items over human interaction Nothing. The men who want these are the men nobody wants. Win-win for both genders. I don’t know… I don’t see this as being a net positive for men. It allows them to emulate something that is missing.…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:10 PM
11

I’m telling you they don’t Source: "Dude. Im telling you"
/r/MensRights29/01/24 02:41 PM
4

most redpill podcasts dont represent majority of men. they literally encourage men to live a playboy's lifestyle. ngl some of their messages are good but a lot of them are more harmful than helpful. and myron seems like one of those alpha males who cant even grill a brisket. i recommend alexander grace and melanie king if you want wholesome content.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:57 PM
14

would you be proud if your sister/mother/daughter did the same thing? what you are feeling is 100% justified.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:50 PM
3

I’m just done only speaking about the points you want to discuss actually no you didnt. So lets address the first part of your problem. Why are you so hellbent on the believe that the passport bros are not capable of loving? If you have a son who is unable to find love in the west, what realistic advice would you give him? (Aside from self-improvement and the usual "just be a nice guy son")
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:20 PM
11

you are doing exactly the same thing
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:03 AM
19

and you think sluts havent been around for centuries?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:42 AM
26

nope slutshaming never worked on women. they even turned it into a profession! slut shaming only works on the slut's male family members.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:19 AM
34

go for it then. ill chop my balls if you upload a pic of his proposal.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:54 AM
33

because me and my wife work with western women. and our neighbors are you know......western since we live here now. i agree slut shaming never worked. no slut in history ever felt shameful for being a slut. its the the slut's father/brother/sons/husbands that feel ashamed for it. and no, most men dont fuck around. stop projecting your chad experience onto most men just because chad did the classic hit and run to you.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:52 AM
2

if the said man has a low bodycount and no history of cheating then im fully supporting it.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:46 AM
57

even you dont have a chance to marry that bulldog
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:44 AM
58

nah. accurate take.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:42 AM
43

nice try but im an immigrant who married a woman from the east, where i was born and raised. i would never marry women from west, id rather die alone and i dont fear dying alone. and yes my wife and i make roughly the same money. also if its really about "not needing financial help" then why are western women extemely hypergamous??????????????????
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:39 AM
5

nah I agree with this guy. with false accusations going rampant this is a pretty solid advice.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:44 AM
17

brainwashed I wouldnt say brainwashed because that implies they dont have their own capacity to think. They chose to hate men on their own accord. Using the word "brainwashed" takes away the accountability on their side.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:28 AM
172

i call this the "plot twist phenomenon". everytime men do something, feminists will always add some kind of dark twist into it. man wants a woman with a low bodycount? omg its insecurity. nothing to do with the fact that men feel its embarrassing to be in a relationship with a slut. man wants a young woman? omg it must be because he is creepy. nothing to do with the fact that younger women are more attractive in general. man wants to marry abroad? omg he is exploiting poor women. it has nothing …
/r/MensRights27/01/24 10:46 PM
34

this is pretty much well known already. in general(and yes not all x are y), men are just objectively more tolerant than women. a below avg women flirting with an attractive man is still appreciated by that man. a below avg man fliting with an attractive women is instantly a creep to that woman.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 10:23 PM
5

turns out men arent pigs afterall. what a surprise.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 06:36 AM
23

all while acting victim at the same time
/r/MensRights27/01/24 12:10 AM
2

What do you all think is at fault for this nah this sht is on us. nobody forcing us live unhealthy. we need to be accountable too.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 10:27 PM
7

employment insurance in canada only lasts 45weeks at MAX because "its enough time to find a job" I am not entirely against alimony, but I have no effing idea why that thing could last more than a decade.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:10 PM
36

What are your thoughts on this new gen Z trend? NGL. I think only a VERY FEW amount are legit. Most of them saw millennials "strong women" hitting the wall. They basically follow the same pattern of ride the carousel > have fun until they are old > settle on being a wife. The only difference IMO(i could be wrong) is that gen-z girls are retiring from the carousel a bit earlier just enough to avoid hitting the wall.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:58 PM
9

op thinks the average guy is as big as jason momoa and can fight thugs like batman
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:18 PM
10

There are far more women who dress like perverts compared to men
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:04 PM
17

choosiness* epidemic
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:57 PM
29

BS. majority of men are capable of loving an average looking women EVEN IF she is broke. majority of women are only capable of loving average looking men if he is wealthy/famous. most women would only fall in love with broke men provided he is above average in looks.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 04:32 AM
2

Main character syndrome. Modern women have the need to be the center of attraction/attention/news. And being a victim will get them to the headline.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:05 PM
2

doesnt that movie mostly have female audience? who voted for him? was it men or women?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 04:26 AM
20

irrelevant. maybe true maybe not. but majority of women today have NEVER experienced any of that. would it be okay if I beat the shit out of my neighbor timmy because his grandpa once assaulted my grandpa?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:59 AM
5

as quack as the math you use in paygap debates?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 12:24 AM
7

neither so its not less valid and not more valid. so its equally valid?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:04 PM
2

to drive men to suicide FACTS
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:59 PM
1

fair point
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:37 PM
3

which comments?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:20 PM
3

Strongly prejudiced against women what did he say exactly?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:18 PM
9

you can have relevant talking points and still not be scientifically literate so does that make your talking points more valid or less valid?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:34 PM
11

he’s mysoginistic define mysoginistic
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:32 PM
13

which women did he hate?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:11 PM
5

HOLY FCK THAT KID EATS MORE THAN ME! And for the record, they cant use bs excuses like rent and bills. People pay rent and bills whether you have a kid or not.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:58 PM
21

quack like quack mathematicians in your "gender pay gap" war?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:57 PM
18

So then what's your definition of pseudo intellectual? the people they find mean and offensive
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:55 PM
12

He spews hate and divisiveness Who did he hate?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:54 PM
8

because its illegal to work in medicine/therapy without a license. altho........I wonder why gurus and spiritual guides are still paid and hired legally. IDK man. EDIT: lol the guru believers group seem triggered
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:52 PM
22

the fact the he got a free pass means there is a high chance he is one of "those guys" that women chase.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:50 PM
3

im in the middle for pearlythings. im not entirely convinced she is fake/genuine. she does have a brother who attempted suicide. that is concerning as a sibling even if you arent MRA. https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1605071631788822528
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:29 PM
1

nope. we simply talking about them since they are the current topic. the only one who brought up obsession is you because u r projecting.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 01:13 PM
3

birth control or not........use a friggin rubber!!!!!!
/r/MensRights24/01/24 01:21 AM
13

exactly. this is the equivalent of making fun of a disabled man for being unable to walk.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 01:13 AM
12

Teach them women don’t owe them sex. only chads and tyrones have this mindset no one will date her if she doesn’t have sex by the third date and who are these guys? thats right. chads and tyrones. they date you and have sex with you then leave you hanging. then you hunt for another chads and tyrones and they repeat the thing. and in that process of chasing chads and tyrones what happens? thats right, you racked up your bodycount to the point where even avg men dont want you anymore.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 12:56 AM
24

because males in general are disposable. you can create as many men/boys as long as you have lots of women around. sadly, we just dont have leverage. mens biggest sin is we are not the gender who can give birth. things will only change once artificial wombs come in to play.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 10:29 PM
1

I am also not every woman oh boi here we go
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:11 PM
2

An d I have certainly never claimed to be lonely! EXACTLY! Problem solved.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:01 PM
15

I disagree on that one thats ok. we dont have to agree on everything. The reason behind it is to milk single men of as much money as they possibly can yes im well aware. its called grifting. but ill take that over MRA having no presence/awareness at all.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:56 PM
2

create a life together thats what you said actually. so ill use "cooperative xyz" to describe them then so we dont stray from the topic I also said “mothered” not “pampered.” well then how should we describe those men then? ill use "mothered xyz" as a placeholder for now back to topic. you did confirm that some of the guys you rejected actually fit the criteria of: * not abusive * "cooperative xyz" * not "mothered xyz" and yet they were still rejected. so this is not an issue of "female loneline…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:48 PM
84

NGL, you got a bit too comfy as a friend (which is supposed to be fine but thats considered creepy nowadays) When it comes to communicating with female coworkers, avoid small talk at all cost. Never talk about anything other than work.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:36 PM
59

a lot of them are fake. but it is STILL a win. they can be fake as hell as long as they are spreading the correct message. beggars cant be choosers and sadly, men of MRA space are the beggars right now. majority of social media hates us. the main media and news outlets hate us. its not ideal but hey ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:31 PM
2

Not at all. So some of them DID qualify yes? Your criteria was "not abusive. willing create life together. not have to be pampered". Are you currently (or have you been) in a relationship with this type of man?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:35 PM
9

Id say its a win-win for both genders. Low-value men would no longer need to chase women since he will have the chance to start a family on his own. And women would no longer have "crEepY mEn" asking them out.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:31 PM
4

WTF
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:27 PM
1

true true not all X are Y. I dont believe its all women either. but majority of women are hypergamous in nature <- this data clearly already shown in dating apps and women reject 70-80% of their suitors. In this specific case the argument was "abusive and have to be mommy-pampered" <- I dont think 70-80% of men are this way, but if you can prove me wrong please do. Majority of average men are happy to date down, majority of average women are only happy if they date up. The average guy would be H…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 03:47 PM
12

and ALL of your exes + the guys you rejected were either abusers or have to be pampered? all of them???
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:11 PM
7

mra want equality. feminists want superiority. balance cant be achieved.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 11:46 AM
31

there are tons of them. you rejected most of them for not being 6ft.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 01:29 AM
12

Angry. = advantage = ruin men's lives nope. still not what op said.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:09 PM
260

male loneliness = nobody wants me female loneliness = that guys that want me dont have a sports car
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:03 PM
17

cabal of elite man-hating internet women making your life difficult You are news anchoring. (aka the classic "so youre saying.......") I reread the OPs post and he never said any of this.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:48 PM
5

Well then. lets turn that IS into a WAS. Just like what feminism did to modesty.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:49 PM
12

by shaming them. men need to shame simps in the same way women shame sluts.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:29 PM
67

by giving them strong father figures. minimize the number of boys growing up in singlemother homes.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:28 PM
3

no one thinks that no man gets offended when a woman calls them scarier What you want men to do? Take that as a compliment? How about this. Since women are hypergamous by nature, would it be fair to say "women are greedier"? and then demand that women should not be offended? I'm getting this group shut down you guys are becoming dangerous, you are cherry picking words just to attack me for being a woman You just have main character syndrome. I would reply the same way whether you are a man or a …
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:01 PM
8

I feel you. But the sad thing, men's biggest sin is they were not the gender born with wombs. From a reproductive standpoint if one's goal is to maintain the population, 1 man with lots a woman works better than lots of man with 1 woman. And this makes sense from a govt standpoint too. More kids = more taxpayers in the futures. Until we reach a time where we can have(and hopefully legalize) artificial wombs, society will continue to consider women's issues more important than men's. And I'm not …
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:31 AM
2

> Women are allowed to be fat fucking land whales because it's empowerment Funny thing is, most average men would gladly date/marry/stay with fat women if the said women has zero history of cheating and promiscuity. EVEN BEFORE the era of body positivity. Men have been disproportionally too supportive on women.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:00 AM
2

but men are scarier Thank you. Now I feel much more handsome......as an ogre.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:26 AM
3

It is revealing that you repeatedly feel the need to caricature or ignore half of statement in order to forward your case. What statement did I ignore? where you would see someone at risk and think "I don't owe women anything" WOMEN HAVE THAT MINDSET! When a woman sees a lonely man crippling with suicidal depression, you think the first thing that comes into their mind is "I should be his girlfriend and save him from depression"? They wont because women dont owe men anything - which I agree. But…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:18 AM
3

As a decent human being it is your obligation to help others in danger if it is within your capacity to do so Like I said in my previous comment: if its a simple as "hey mam look out there is falling vase above you". Then yes. But robbery?????? so a man has to be willing to fight some thugs to qualify as a decent human being?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:09 AM
1

Wife material to Chad 1 may not be wife material to Chads 2, 3, 4. Ok. But i never ask out about 1 woman to multiple chads. Im asking about 1chad having multiple women. You make a lot of assumptions Nope. I'm simply looking at it from a mathematical perspective. A man who is committed to one woman would be you know....sleeping with one woman during the time of relationship. A man bedding different women every weekend indicates he is not in a committed relationship. Is there a chance he NEVER fou…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:33 AM
4

nothing in life is entirely risk free so because men are taking risk in life decisions, that means it is mandatory for men to play batman and stop a robbery?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:19 AM
1

Just because one is focused on finding a long term relationship does not mean they won't have numerous sexual partners A man who is focused on finding a long term relationship would not be jumping from one woman to another. And no, I never said "hey you must never have sex with any woman other than your potential" Thats not what I said. We are talking about playboys here, men who bed different women every weekend. Men with extremely high value either through looks/wealth/fame. Of all the women w…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:16 AM
49

Facts. Not being the main character for a week is a sign of oppression to them.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 12:54 AM
8

You can't get out of bed with 0% risk. Ok, So if a man gets out of bed........it is suddenly mandatory the he play batman?????? I know you sounded very smart in your head but....what was your point? 💀
/r/MensRights22/01/24 12:36 AM
1

Alright then. lets assume you are on the opposite side. Ok so lemme break it down to you (from a monogamy perspective). What the internet calls Chads nowadays are what the 90s people call the playboys. You dont get to be a playboy by being a regular 5'7 guy working on mcdonalds. These playboys are either extremely attractive/wealthy/popular. Aka these are the guys that are "guy I brag to my friends" material. And by definition, playboys have extremely high number of sexual partners. If a man is …
/r/MensRights22/01/24 12:33 AM
7

Who has the capacity to safely stop a robbery with 0% risk?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 12:24 AM
10

And its not deranged to encourage men to just go willynilly risk their lives for random people? If its a quick "hey look out there is falling vase above you" then yeah sure I agree. If you see someone getting robbed, help them if it is within your capacity to do so But stopping a robbery like you are batman? Sir this is planet earth. The average men could easily die from trying to interfere such incident. This is not some kind of comic book where the average guy just comes out as an unharmed her…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:21 PM
3

Now that Im on my laptop I can freely type without using a clunky touchscreen UI. What you or I "believe" doesn't matter. First of all, it matters. The fact that you are asking for proof of my statement means you probably dont believe it and want to make a point for the opposite side. It matters because it gives the other party what point needs to be discussed. So I'm gonna ask you again. Do you really believe the top% men are settling for random girls that they hooked up with?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 09:57 PM
19

EXACTLY!
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:45 PM
5

id like to agree with the title but then again people label evrything as misogyny the moment you say something that women disagree. simply caring about bodycount is already considered misogyny nowadays.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:35 PM
4

im making up the fact that you have a brain? btw you accidentally replied on your 2nd accnt. double check next time.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:42 AM
24

would it be fair to say "if a woman sees a single lonely man then she should enter an honest relationship with him"?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:32 AM
26

thats how you raise a 304
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:30 AM
5

its a fact that you have a brain despite not having peer reviewed docs to prove it.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:23 AM
18

i dont have a peer reviewed document stating that you have a brain but somehow you and i still believe you have one.(or maybe two if you are on of those non binarytards) now do you really believe the top% men are settling for random girls that they hooked up with?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:07 AM
1

it was
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:35 AM
35

its hostile to acknowledge truth?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:22 AM
56

nope. chad or not, its men who have to make the effort to get sex. chads are being rewarded.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:39 AM
26

he meant the courts dont take it seriously
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:58 PM
34

gay wife = feels empowered by giving you bjs feminist wife = feels empowered by refusing to make a sandwich
/r/MensRights20/01/24 08:38 PM
2

has there been any evidence yet?
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:55 PM
2

what experience?
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:23 PM
7

the same argument could be said if you lose your job. if you have a high paying job with toxic environment you would most likely stay to avoid poverty. and i dont care how rich my wife is. if we divorce, id still go job hunting if i dont have a job. there is no justification for lifetime worth of alimony.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:17 AM
6

Reddit is a feminist hive mind more or less Facts. reddit at this point is a simp/whiteknight breeding ground.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:46 PM
6

or you know........get a friggin job???????? in canada they have something called Employment Insurance where the government supports you for a max of 45 weeks in the event that you lose your job. If 45 weeks is enough to help you land a job then I dont get the idea why alimony could last for decades.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:38 PM
1

Men refusing to date modern women is clearly resulting in lower birthrates. Lower birthrate = fewer taxpayers in the future. fewer taxpayers = lesser money to fund the senator's new Ferrari.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:29 PM
1

men who are anti-promiscuity For the record tho, majority of men are NOT anti-promiscuity. We support the idea of "my body my choice", you can go sleep with whoever you want. We just dont support the idea of brainwashing young men into thinking that a high bodycount is not a red flag. Especially since it mostly leads to high amount of devastating divorce and suicide.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:22 PM
19

In what sense are they not?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 10:36 PM
16

Ahhh the classic pattern. Exposing sexuality and behaving like a wh0re for money/attention when young and its considered empowering Grows old and now sexual exposure is suddenly bad. (Its either that or the usual "I was exploited")
/r/MensRights19/01/24 10:35 PM
5

Same usually applies to men making the same generalization Wrong. Majority of men are willing to date/marry down. Majority of women are NOT willing to date/marry down. There is even a word for that. I forgot what its called but I think it starts with Hyper...
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:58 AM
3

Lemme break it down for you. Imagine you are born in an nature-rich island where everyone is aquaman and everyone can catch fish easily anytime they want. Then there is this other island where its full of storms and only have regular humans and they have difficulty catching fish, but you dont know that since you assume that every human on earth is an aquaman and that every island is full of seafood. You start thinking they are lazy and that there is something wrong with them. That is how women a…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:52 AM
2

Personally, I believe that if both partners work, then they should share stuff like housework accordingly (that includes cooking, cleaning, laundry etc). to be fair. he never said that only the woman must solely do the cooking and cleaning. he simply said "a woman who cooks and cleans". my wife cooks and cleans too. and yes we do take turns from time to time.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:11 AM
9

that men are not misogynistic for not wanting a woman with a high bodycount. and that it is not men's fault that women wont reject playboys or men with high bodycount.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:04 AM
7

the feminitard sub uses this term a lot against muslim women. especially the ones who willingly wear hijab. they accuse muslim women of having internalized misogyny that they are "brainwashed by patriarchy". And IMO to imply that muslim women are merely simpletons that are easy to brainwash and not capable of independent thinking just because they choose to be modest is actually very misogynistic if you ask me.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:01 AM
7

because your question doesnt make sense. the general case is that you pay child supp if the woman KEEPS the baby. so from what I understood on OP's reply, this gives men the option to not be forced to pay child supp when the baby is kept. basically, paper abortion is useless if the woman already decided to abort the baby. and besides, a woman who says "ill only keep the baby if I get money out it" shouldnt really be a mother in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:22 PM
–

what does it do?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 08:39 PM
58

Also offers paper abortions for men who don't want to become fathers what does this mean?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 05:50 PM
11

One factor is due to projection of personal experience. Women and elite men have this mindset that the average man can easily get a girlfriend with a push of a button. They have ZERO clue what amount of work an average man has to do to even get an honest date - a date where the other party didnt participate for the sake of a free meal. The average women believe that the average men can just get laid by just simply opening their zipper. So with that in mind, they are bound to believe that "he can…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 03:50 PM
40

If you are in america you have your right to free speech use it practice with caution tho. some people actually lost their jobs because of cancel culture. free speech is only free if you agree with the wokes.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:27 PM
6

put your properties in your mom's name
/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:07 PM
6

incels are fishermen dealt with a bad lifetime of storms. women who are still single at 30 because "they cant find a good man" is like Poseidon making excuses why he cant catch a fish.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:42 PM
1

definitely worth a try. but i have a feeling its only a matter of time before girls start registering fake profiles so they can advertise their insta/twitch/of on your app.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:45 PM
1

Nobody is saying that. Reading the comments, people are simply stating that the risk vs reward is simply a bad gamble. I went to college too and I liked how my life turned out and I like the job and opportunities I got because of college. But I'd be lying if I dont admit that I regret paying for studies that I never really needed like philosophy, history, arts and music simply because its required by the curriculum. I just dont give a damn about King Leonidas and my job performance absolutely ha…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:32 PM
1

If it was simply the cost of education not being justified, we wouldn’t see more and more women going to college. Because women can afford the risk. A college girl with a career going south and is buried in student loan could work in a grocery store and marry a construction worker who earns 40-50k. A college guy with a career going south and is buried in student loan has a very thin chance of marrying a woman who earns 40-50k.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:24 PM
1

From an evolutionary aspect, a woman who is not at the center of men's attention is a woman less likely to have multiple options, thus less freedom of picking her "provider and protector". Fewer attention = fewer potential suitors. Being the center of attention is a MUST for majority of women. Whether thats a good thing or bad, I honestly dont know. And I'll abstain from picking a side on this one before some feminitard tries to attack me for simply stating facts.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:51 PM
2

I never argued whether they will take this option or not. I simply stated that if worse comes to worst, push comes to shove, or if her end of the world is coming, majority of women have this as an option (its up to them whether they are willing to take it or not). The average men with a failed college career dont have this option. Which is a VERY big factor on why men should not go to college. There is no safe fallback.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:57 PM
2

40- 50k isn't going to provide financial stability for a family 40-50k is enough if you live in a small rural town - at least where I live. The husband may require driving long hours or living camp truck a few months every year a year but still, thats valid living/surviving. And like I pointed out, you may have to give up some luxury in life - kids are considered luxury. A woman whose husband makes $40-50k is still going to have to work. Well she could work as a cashier at a grocery store to hel…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:40 PM
3

Still an option regardless. The average man (especially one buried in student loan) dont have the option to say "ill marry this woman even if I end up unhappy just so I can get out of my broke situation".
/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:17 PM
2

This is under the condition that women take good care of themselves. There are plenty of women who don't look like potential partners even for those construction workers Yes of course. But women who dont take care of themselves are rare exemptions. Just like Women with extreme criminal records. Women who are born without teeth. Women who already have 3 kids during college. Women born with body disfigurement. I explicitly used the words "in general" and "average" because I know there will always …
/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:14 PM
14

> The next generations of women aren't going to have this option either (as a whole) If they are out-earning men then they dont really need that option. A average college girl who cant find a job still has an enormous chance to marry a construction worker who makes 40-50k a year and be a housewife. Sure, she has to give up on those expensive instagram vacations but at least she is still taken care of. Men dont have this option. Life after college is still a win-win for women in general and lose-…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:58 PM
18

adding to this. the average men dont really have the option to marry up and expect to be taken care of by a high income wife just in case college/career doesnt work out. so there is really not enough reason to take the risk without a safe fallback.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:14 PM
11

probably? imagine the feminists backlash against gay people when they realize even men are better wives than women
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:23 AM
4

AI gfs is peak level d@generacy Nah. paying for OF and twitch girls is MUCH MUCH worse.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 08:27 PM
2

Nope. I can 100% bet they never took this survey to 3rd world countries where there are more traditional relationships and conservative couples. For the average man, the idea of cheating is EXHAUSTING. Imagine having to impress another woman, having to keep another woman happy and having to slice your average wage to another woman. Not to mention men risk half of their assets and can lose their kids if he gets caught cheating. Not to mention this survey very biased among men who didnt even get t…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:53 PM
4

If men were to get pregnant, abortion would not even be an option.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:09 PM
2

is the kid eating gold bars for breakfast?
/r/MensRights07/01/24 04:10 PM
3

special care exactly. its messed up but thats how the liberal hivemind works.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 06:31 PM
2

who determines that though majority of men. there is a reason why people never(or rarely) get "cancelled" for making "small pepper" jokes.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 05:31 PM
3

because majority of men are not offended by sexist jokes
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:03 PM
5

cannot even spell pre nup I doubt you have any money worth protecting : Floyd Mayweather enters the chat
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:43 AM
26

I have a happy marriage and got extremely lucky with a woman who loves to cook, doesnt upload selfies (unless its a very special occasion like Christmas reunion with her family) and she lost her v-card to me when she was 18(i was 19 at that time). And she doesnt entertain anyone who tries to ask her out. But even I would not recommend marriage. I'm not oblivious of the fact that my situation does not represent the majority.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 10:46 PM
10

Theres also not enough women in construction and oil rigs by the way. I wonder why feminitards arent fighting to even those out.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:23 PM
12

Link number 4 actually disproved your point. Did you even read those articles? Or did you just google random stuff and then pasted it here?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:19 PM
6

And people have been making fun of Napoleon for being a short guy ever since french revolution. So youre not really making any point.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:16 PM
7

Men get bothered by women sleeping with other men because he counts the man as a valid person - his equal and competition Incorrect. I will speak IN GENERAL/MAJORITY (im not gonna talk about "not all x are y") Men care about a woman's male-bodycount more than her female-bodycount because sex for men is something that has to be achieved, an act of winning. Sex for women is an act of giving the consent, its not something she needs to achieve. Men dont like the idea of other men being proud because…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 03:46 PM
20

the patriarchy is literally setup to put men in charge in order to serve women. when a boat sinks, it is mandatory that we save women (and children if any) first. military conscription is the highest proof that women benefit from the patriarchy. if the patriarchy was really setup to put women at disadvantage, as feminitards claim, then every garbage collector would have been female.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 02:16 PM
22

Woke hiring - being a male (especially if you are white and straight) will reduce your chances getting hired in tech jobs. For now you have better success at trade school than college. Anti male agendas - why the hell would young men go to an institution that encourages self-hate? Lack of options to marry up - most average guys dont get the chance to marry a richer wife. You dont really have the security to say "if things dont go well Ill just become a house husband". If college doesnt work out …
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:14 PM
10

those stats include our grandpas you bright donut
/r/MensRights28/12/23 01:47 PM
29

If men aren't picking the ugly women for relationships, then ugly women aren't getting picked Incorrect. Majority of men, especially the average ones ALWAYS date/marry down. Most average men (avg on looks or maybe status) will only ask out women who are slightly below average. The problem is majority women who are slightly below average will want and "wait" for Mr Right - usually a guy who is slightly above average.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 08:43 PM
311

Male loneliness: "I have accepted that I'm not desirable therefor I stopped trying" Female loneliness: "The guys who like me are not 6ft"
/r/MensRights27/12/23 05:28 PM
2

and like i said "we wont know for sure". i dont agree nor disagree with the OP.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 06:40 PM
1

because a generalization is concluded based on majority and not minority. saying the general of men are rapists is just as stupid as saying the general of men are financially powerful while using elon and bill gates as the strata. would it be acceptable to say "women with kids dont want to be mothers. they just want kids to collect child support money"?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 06:34 PM
32

we wont know for sure. and the feminitards will just rebut with "not all x are y".
/r/MensRights26/12/23 04:56 AM
1

id call it an exploit. the loophole that allows one to leech from the money that is supposed to only benefit the child. e.g if you use the cs money to buy groceries, is there a guarantee that only the child will eat from that grocery?
/r/MensRights24/12/23 04:46 AM
1

didn't know mothers were so unresponsible No, I wouldnt call it irresponsible. And yes Im aware, not all X are Y. More like they found a loophole to make it seem like their child eats at a 3star restaurant everyday.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:58 PM
1

what i noticed is its not the attractiveness of a man itself that they want. women want a man that they can brag/showoff to other women, the same reason why women want an overly expensive gucci handbag. it just so happened that an attractive man is easy to brag. but given a scenario where they have to choose between a prettyboy CEO from a random IT firm vs an ugly but ultra popular nfl star, majority of women will choose the nfl star.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:52 PM
17

the only explanation we need
/r/MensRights22/12/23 09:07 PM
5

the government gets very little out of the child support program on 1 lower class family yes. but tie that with all the middle class and higher class childsupp payers and the govt actually gets waaaaaay too much than they deserve.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:21 PM
7

Because only a miniscule actually goes to the child. And then they use excuses like rent and bills to justify the amount needed. NEWSFLASH - you pay rent and bills whether you have a child or not. Sure you use more water and electricity when you have a child - but then who actually measures the amount of usage that exclusively benefits the kid?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:18 PM
15

to be fair. not voting is just as bad as voting the wrong candidate. we as men also need to be accountable for boycotting elections.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:58 PM
3

Has nothing to do with the post. The issue is not about someone asking you whether you want to chug it down or not.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 01:42 PM
11

this ^
/r/MensRights20/12/23 05:40 PM
4

family courts' way of saying "we aint getting enough divorce commission for our new ferrari"
/r/MensRights20/12/23 03:27 PM
2

translation: "i dont agree with you therefor you are stupid"
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:29 PM
2

translation: "i dont have the capacity to think that its possible for my views to be challenged therefor the opposite view is pathetic"
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:15 PM
2

you are confusing difficulty vs acceptability. if someone can kidnap the USA president without anyone's help, that is impressive but that doesnt mean its acceptable to just run around and kidnap people. as a man, raising your bodycount is a challenge while preserving it is easy. for the woman its the opposite - raising your bodycount is easy while preserving it is a challenge. its called common sense - the easy path gets shamed while the challenging path praised. if a man has a bodycount of 20 b…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:17 PM
2

you literally dont know how to use "literally"
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:12 PM
18

facts. feminitards will label anyone a misogynist the moment they say bodycount matters.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 12:25 AM
6

same thing probably. men are will never become a protected class. especially the white ones.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:48 PM
-21

not if it ticks in reverse
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:46 PM
8

Bodycount MATTERS. Never let feminitards gaslight/brainwash you. Dont marry someone in order to be happy. Marry someone who is willing to struggle with you Dismiss everyone who tried to discredit #1
/r/MensRights17/12/23 12:50 AM
1

its a platform full of leftists. ofc its antimen.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 05:34 AM
12

100% agree. simps/whiteknights need to stop this begging behavior.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:39 PM
5

why my comment triggered you so badly i literally have no idea which part you think your comment triggered me and i have no idea how you arrived to that "triggered" conclusion. you just want to believe im triggered (tho i have no idea which part is triggering). The sub has 27k people, not really "some" id say thats a pretty good source of information. 27k people is LITERALLY a "some". add that to couples who are not married and people who are just hooking up. there are MUCH MORE males asking for…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:17 PM
12

you are arguing for the "some". deadbedroom doesnt even represent majority of the couples (or "sexual partners" as they call it nowadays). and even on marriage, a wife can still sue the husband for rape. plus, a husband not wanting sex (especially in deadbedrooms case) most of the time is due to lost of libido as men age (or erectile dysfunction). its not a case of "men refusing to give consent".
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:29 PM
87

for real. we sexualize women not because we are perverts. we sexualize women because they are the gender who have the power to provide consent to sex. we are the ones who have to ask(and sometimes beg). Sexualization is a form worship to the sexually powerful beings(women). the same way comic nerds want to see superman in action beating up the foes, since he is physically powerful and they worship that power.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:18 AM
15

the problem is feminitards will label anyone as a misogynist the moment they hear something they dont agree with. simply giving young men the advice to avoid committing/marrying women with high bodycount is already considered misogynistic according to these creatures.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:47 AM
26

up for norah vincent
/r/MensRights07/12/23 10:08 PM
10

no they fking not. they dont get diversity perks in universities nor in tech jobs.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:44 AM
5

which is already happening a lot anyway with modern moms divorcing their husbands. so nothing really changes THAT much in that department.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:22 AM
15

the "incels" and "nice guys" no longer need to simp and beg women to marry them if they want to be a father. and women will no longer be pressured to get pregnant and have kids. a win-win for both genders actually.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 12:16 AM
3

my theory is these teachers miss being "the campus crush" during their highschool days. so they compensate by trying to get that feeling back from students.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:51 PM
2

only to parents and siblings
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:47 PM
43

next theyll claim cats were better house guards than dogs
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:55 PM
33

overly ridiculous amount of alimony + child supp + half of assets = encouraged wives to live as empowered single mothers basically, fatherless children grew up to be estrogen-filled simps and 304s
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:10 PM
1

a burden of proof a day keeps the libtard away
/r/MensRights27/11/23 08:34 PM
2

38% chance to end up only ever seeing your child during visitation alimony + child support + half of your assets is really emotionally crushing. but the part about not freely seeing your kid can rip a man's guts out.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:15 PM
8

We kind of do actually (in a way). And its one of the few reasons why male athletes earn more than female athletes. 1 example - Men spend tickets/payperview on men's sports. Im not a big fan of basketball but I can name 5 nba players. While most women cant even name at least 3 wnba players without having to open google.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 12:28 AM
1

no such thing as diversity hiring specifically catered for men.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 07:35 PM
3

they look for the guys with 6ft 6pack 6figures. the typical attributes of a playboy (yes not all x are y, but the general majority are). these are guys who have the privilege and opportunity to "pump and dump". they dont look at the regular joe working at the construction site (who are most likely to pursue an emotional relationship)
/r/MensRights25/11/23 01:44 AM
3

this is the only answer we need
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:25 PM
17

correct. men dont have the option to get sex by simply giving consent and opening their legs.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 01:04 PM
9

youre missing the point. he never said men dont need flexibility. he simply explained that in the context, the man got paid more not because of sexism but because he was willing to trade comfort in exchange for more working hours.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 09:36 AM
28

and a vast majority of men use social media too. so its not really a false equivalency since there isnt much narrative saying "porn affects female audience negatively". the media always says it affects men negatively.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 04:20 AM
1

There no point in arguing with you if you just take everything out of context and make up arguments that i’ve never said actually you are the one making this out of context. I am simply answering the OP's question and you are like "no no no you are wrong". I know me better than you know me. "harassment and sexism women face" good thing I have common sense and a solution, dont dress/wear something provocative. they can say whatever they want and I'll take it as a compliment. The moment they touch…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 12:21 AM
1

false. the grass is always greener on the side that wasnt neglected.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:32 PM
2

in summary.(assuming both are single and no kids) a woman who is not successful is expected to have a "knight in shining armor" a man who is not successful is expected to "do better"
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:26 PM
1

that may have sounded pretty smart in your head but you just proved the OP's point
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:22 PM
1

this would be true in rare cases where the "other woman" actually managed to convince the husband to breakup/divorce the current wife in order to be with the new one. but in common cases such as a fling, all she managed to do is give consent and open her legs in front of the husband. so she doesnt have "victory" over the current wife. and correct me if im wrong, women barely know how it feels to be emasculated.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 04:08 PM
80

it equally hurts for both men and women. but here is the key difference. sex for men needs to be achieved - its an act of victory. sex for women requires giving consent - its an act of surrendering herself to a man. when a husband cheats the wife feels betrayal. when a wife cheats the husband feels betrayal + total defeat/emasculation. you know deep down the "other guy" is looking down on you like he just spat on your face while knowing there was nothing you could do about it. even if we assume …
/r/MensRights23/11/23 05:50 AM
0

What I meant with ”your arguments are very shallow and based on emotion” is that none of your arguments are based on the truth. They’re your opinions that you think are true So when its your opinion they are all based on truth but when its my opinion they are all fiction? So it is not true that majority of men prefer to be at least 6'? So its not true that divorce aftermath is more brutal for the majority of men compared to majority of women? So its not true that avg women have more options to m…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:17 AM
5

at the end of the day it was your decision. if she begged you to eat poop would you have complied?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 07:07 PM
3

continue fighting. never give up on your rights.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:41 PM
1

i agree with your intention but its kinda bit out of topic op. im downvoting not because its a bad discussion but because its just too irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:20 PM
6

No other platform licks womens arses like Reddit does FACTS FACTS FACTS
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:02 PM
1

so.......just regular feminism? are they at least actively helping the community clean the ocean and sewers? or jumping in the dirt to segregate biodegradable vs biodegradable wastes? or any other "woman saving the environment" stuff?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:53 PM
112

is their child eating gold bars for breakfast?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:47 PM
2

men are labeled as misogynists for simply caring about "bodycount". thats how deep reddit has fallen.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 10:38 AM
2

makes sense. majority of women care about women's issues. majority of men dont even care about men's issues.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 10:26 AM
0

First of all, you forgot to address the OP's question "Do y'all feel like your life would be better if you were a woman". And in my case its a 100% yes. Your arguments are very shallow and your basing every argument on your own emotions my bad. i forgot that women's issues are to be addresses while men's issues are to be dismissed as shallow and emotional. (see i wish i had that kind of privilege). Wearing high heels does not disprove anything it’s a fashion choice. It does other things than jus…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 05:07 PM
1

Women worry about their heights so it’s the same problem with men just opposite. Women tend to want to be shorter that fact that a good amount of women wear high heels disproves your madeup nonsense. yes there are 6ft women who fall into that category but they dont even represent the majority. whereass majority of men however suffer the consequence of being less than 6. Who is laughing at you after someone cheats? There’s no proof that happens to men more often Twitter is literally laughing at w…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:05 PM
2

"he is too focused on his career"
/r/MensRights20/11/23 10:40 AM
87

why are they upset about not having the men that they never wanted in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/11/23 05:55 AM
5

lesser burden for being the protector and provider able to talk/vent out without being judged as weak more chances and options to marry up diversity hiring, a man and a woman equally skilled applying the same position will most of the time favor the woman (no to mention "women in tech" job fairs) not have to worry about my height divorce aftermath (self explanatory) people will sympathize for me and not laugh at me in case my husband cheats privilege to label compliments as "unwanted" lesser jai…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 05:13 AM
11

100% yes.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 04:07 PM
2

Have you seen what feminists did to Nora Vincent? Even MRA women dont stand a chance against feminists. What chance do men have.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:17 PM
1

TLDR; "I wanna make bad decisions but have the freedom to blame the patriarchy for it."
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:04 PM
1

this
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:19 PM
1

wtf
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:02 PM
48

lemme guess. these creatures who want the "well-being" of the unborn child also support abortion?
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:27 AM
-2

the first wave of feminism was actually good. it had positive changes. the 2nd and 3rd however....
/r/MensRights15/11/23 12:42 AM
18

you just noticed?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:53 AM
11

I see people saying male friend groups are misogynistic but I don’t see it thats because "misogyny" has lost its meaning. women will label you as misogynistic the moment you have an opinion that they disagree with. e.g Simply saying that men care about a woman's bodycount is already considered misogynistic nowadays.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 01:55 PM
3

misogyny = anything that women disagree with. thats the new meaning.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 09:17 PM
3

by "attempt" it mostly means they wanted to try but then changed their mind midway.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:04 PM
3

god forbid a man tries to enjoy the money he earned
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:39 PM
2

i dont really mind if they are grifting as long as they spread the correct message
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:00 PM
5

To play the devil's advocate here (and no! i dont encourage bestiality). Its because men in general have waaaay less sexual access and opportunities compared to women. AND AGAIN I REPEAT, i dont agree nor encourage bestiality. But sexual frustration is definitely a driving factor on why this is happening. A random female mcdonald's worker has much more sexual opportunities compared to her male equivalent.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 09:30 PM
217

its called bragplaining. the act of complaining with the intention to brag (omg im so hot people stare at me). its the female equivalent of a guy saying "man its exhausting to have multiple girlfriends"
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:33 PM
10

fembot troll post
/r/MensRights09/11/23 03:53 PM
9

wtf. this a troll post lol.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 03:47 PM
70

most have gone mgtow. the others are already taken by good women.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:41 PM
13

not as much as you may think but it does happen. ive seen a small surge of men who think its misogynistic to care about bodycount. and they would call you incel/immature/insecure for it.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 07:10 PM
15

as expected. feminitards are downvoting a post thats just trying to spread a positive message.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:31 PM
24

If I were single, Id rather die a virgin than ever settle for Chad's fleshlight.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:57 PM
19

fewer families = fewer kids = fewer future taxpayers = fewer funds for the governor's new ferrari
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:18 PM
47

and by "single" do they mean partnerless single or single as in concubines of high value men?
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:19 PM
2

more like the start of a new era
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:16 PM
9

the ability to recognize that just like men, women also have flaws is not misogynistic.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 04:11 AM
2

thats what i just said. if you read carefully, im specifically referring to men who got their bodycount by paying for prostitutes. thats easy as hell. thats why these men are the equivalent of sluts.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 12:43 AM
5

i wont argue which one is more challenging. but its still a challenge regardless. and its unfair to women with low bodycount if we dont at least give them credit for preserving their bodycount.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:56 PM
2

bcoz just like men, women also have libido. and denying sex to someone you find attractive is a challenge.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:08 PM
1

to speak from a neutral perspective. its a fair double standard. the same reason why sluts are being shamed and playboys are being praised (and for the record, no i dont praise playboys, but a lot do). as a man, preserving your bodycount is easy while raising it is a challenge as a woman, preserving your bodycount is a challenge while raising it is easy challengers are praised while an easy route is shamed. Q: But wait, isnt it unfair if men can f_ck around without being shamed? Actually yes the…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:53 PM
45

to be fair. whats unrealistic to us men may simply just be whats ideal for women. who are we to dictate what a woman should want? what I dont agree is the propaganda they (you know who) try to spread that modern men are just simply "not trying enough". life is not an RPG where you are guaranteed to level up just by simply grinding. you dont magically get a promotion by working hard you can be good and still go unnoticed (happens mostly to introvert and timid workers) "just start a business" - th…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 03:42 PM
18

powerful positions like garbage collectors and oilrig workers?
/r/MensRights06/11/23 09:21 AM
2

agree. biggest example is the patriarchy, which is the essence of "putting men in charge to serve women". and yet somehow feminitards found a way to be "victims".
/r/MensRights05/11/23 04:13 AM
27

feminitards*
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:09 PM
18

ahhh the classic "so youre saying"
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:26 PM
-7

nah. there are still good women out there. dont expect to get lucky tho.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:54 AM
18

the avg women doesnt need a dildo tho. a slightly chubby chick still has more sexual opportunities than an avg guy working in I.T.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 03:12 AM
38

porn = bad hookup culture = empowerment
/r/MensRights31/10/23 03:08 AM
3

not all but in general, women would much rather be a sidechick of a high value man than be in a monogamous relationship with a plumber. wether you like it or not, we live in an era of social media where flaunting and bragging has become a "need". women want a man that they can brag. who could potentially provide a lifestyle that they can brag (expensive vacation photos and stuff) dont get me wrong, there are still good women out there. but too rare that it requires you to get lucky. and most men…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:41 AM
41

the argument "i have a high bodycount but i never cheated on my husband" literally translates "i have to endure being married to a zero-dignity simp because chads stopped looking at me"
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:22 AM
11

updated. tnx.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:45 PM
32

Ok thanks for the correction. Im sure those extra 5 inches will turn him into the ideal guy now.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:44 PM
38

fewer taxpayers = less taxes to collect = less money to fund the governor's new car
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:28 PM
82

The thing is, they are pointing fingers at the burning candle instead of match that ignited it. Lets stop blaming modern women for a minute and take a look at the perspective of the average young men of today: A - He is probably 5'4 5'9. He earns 45k a year. He doesnt have "pretty boy" face. And he doesnt have the hairline of a tony stark. Crooked teeth. Bad jawline. Big nose. He has been rejected 10 out of 10 times (maybe 18 out of 20 if he is using a dating app) B - At this point he already kn…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 11:21 PM
117

sorry someone was just creeping on me dont take it personal. this is a classic case of main-character-syndrome. whenever someone(you) does something, these people always(her) auto-assume that it has something to do with them. ignore and move on.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 12:55 AM
3

Like I said, you WONT answer the question because answering it belies your claim of not being misogynistic I wont answer because you already know the answer deary :) You claim there’s a million sources but you can’t provide one? What university studies should I look up? I'm pretty sure you already know but here...i'll play along. literally the first result. Lemme guess? You didnt find it? Because you didnt bother looking it up. Why? Because you already decided that you refuse to believe it. (con…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 12:06 AM
4

So you’re unwilling or unable to explain yourself? nice bait but i aint falling for it. you want an explanation? there are millions of explanation and resources out there. the only reason you cant find it is because you already made a decision that you want it to be false. “it’s on YouTube!” Is a pretty lame answer tbh lol you left out the part about university studies and machine learning models. but thats okay, i already expected you to do that (you weed out the parts that is unfavorable to yo…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:42 PM
3

as i said, provide the sample link. and also, a thin exemption does not invalidate an accurate generalization. is it wrong to say "tigers are dangerous when near humans"? ofc not. But are there actually tigers that are docile and harmless to humans? yes there are (a very small amount of circus tigers are completely harmless). does that mean we should just go ahead and touch tigers hoping they are docile? i believe u are smart enough to answer that. This is an accurate generalization therfor peop…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:29 PM
5

this has been explained a bunch of times from youtube, reddit, stats from university studies and even machine learning models. So im 100% sure you already know why it matters. im tired of explaining it and im sick of people who pretending about not knowing why it matters. you raise me a dumb question so ill raise you another dumb question. Why shouldnt they?
/r/MensRights29/10/23 09:27 PM
10

Instead its just filled with misogynestic takes it is remarkably clear that sometimes it’s not about “men’s rights” it’s about you having an enormous hate of women care to provide some sample links? i have a feeling you are another one of those "women disagree with it therefor its misogyny".
/r/MensRights29/10/23 05:13 PM
16

the ability to recognize that just like men, women also have flaws is not misogyny. telling men to stay away from women who sleep around is not misogyny. making men aware about a woman's red flag is not misogyny. not everything you disagree with is automatically misogyny.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 01:42 PM
16

because family courts and lawyers earn money from alimony and child supp. marriage to them is a gold mine.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 08:42 AM
14

we badly need a new platform. reddit is just waaay too left-infested
/r/MensRights26/10/23 04:34 AM
15

you think caregivers should get equal pay to someone who cleans sewers?
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:18 AM
5

ehh. not really. but depends on the context.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:08 PM
3

i do see a few women supporting and voicing for mra under r/feminitards. but everything they write gets taken down in like hours. they dont even have a chance to raise awareness.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:33 PM
55

for decades, women have been treated like angels/queens who are perfect and can do no wrong. the patriarchy summed up is literally "putting men in charge to serve women", hence we have chivalry. men waking up to the idea that "just like men, women also have flaws" is a very new concept that is just so hard to grasp for them. especially to women who never had to face rejection their entire life. "im a 10/10 beautiful woman. my bodycount shoudnt matter. he must be immature/incel."
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:21 PM
3

misogyny has a become a buzzword at this point. every feminist uses it, none can actually define it.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 02:29 AM
1

"his" profile also seems new
/r/MensRights20/10/23 06:23 PM
8

she asked if I wanted to have sex I agreed and we ended up having sex i took a photo of it and told her I was sending it to the new man NGL this feels fake as hell (tho im not saying it is). You had sex with a woman who cheated on you and you deliberately revealed your plan to her?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 06:21 PM
4

yup
/r/MensRights07/10/23 10:49 PM
24

the ability to recognize that just like men, women also have flaws is not misogyny
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:50 PM
5

still doesnt make sense. the men who will buy it are the men nobody wants.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:03 PM
–

Minimal impact. Majority of the customers will be the guys that girls dont want in the first place. So its more like "high tech fappping". The world will continue as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 10:20 PM
4

its only lonely if your only purpose is yourself. do some volunteer work at orphanages or animal shelters. or create some kind of online community.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:15 AM
23

or you can go mgtow and not have to worry about any of this (even I would probably go mgtow if I didnt meet my wife - and yes, she grew up in a very traditional family)
/r/MensRights25/09/23 09:32 PM
40

majority of the time. that woman is the coal-digger.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:58 PM
1

they do get challenged like a bunch of times already. but then again, everyday they will invent a new reason to demonize men for having any sort of standard.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:52 PM
1

Men want woman with a lower body count because that usually younger woman and younger woman are easier to manipulate and form into whatever sick fantasy you have come up in your head on what the "perfect" woman is FALSE. if a son ever learns that his mom has a promiscuous past, that son would feel ashamed and develop suicidal thoughts. any father would be disappointed if he ever hears rumor about his daughter being the town's bicycle. Purity is not a relationship value. Its a family value - and …
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:25 PM
1

woman need to be treated better and fairly It is fair. Thats why women women with lower a body count gets more respect from their mother-in-laws. And father-in-laws trust guys with lower bodycount to marry or take their daughter out.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:15 PM
2

🤦
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:22 AM
2

false. no sane father would ever recommend their daughter to date/marry a playboy.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:44 AM
1

and why not?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:39 AM
6

The way that economics works is that economists compare two similarly situated people To be fair. You femsies are the ones who refuse to take this approach. Everytime you bring up the wage-gap you always mention men like elon musk, bill gates + other b/millionaires. A.k.a you use outliers to create your conclusion. But yeah, someone good in math such as yourself dont even know this.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:43 PM
13

unless you're an incel welp. happily married to a woman who loves to cook and doesnt upload selfies. the only time we dont "do it" is when my lower back hurts. but nice try femsy.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:37 PM
8

comparing average wages, not men and women doing the same work Correct. Women in general, would rather work minwage at a fastfood than earn midwage as a garbage collector.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:36 AM
33

The same reason why femsies keep preaching "bodycount doesnt matter". Its an attempt to make themselves look good.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:12 PM
6

Short answer Divorce courts earn money from child-support. Divorce courts earn money from alimony. It wont be long until they make it illegal for men to stay single.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 03:52 AM
4

assuming both parents are responsible, custody should go to whoever earns more
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:01 AM
9

Some of it are justified and some of it are overboard
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:37 PM
47

Short answer: Women(not all but most) got used to preferential treatment. Men used to worship women and put them on the pedestal and treat them like goddesses/angels who do no wrong. They are worried about chivalry starting to die. This sub acknowledges that just like men, women also have flaws. This feels threatening from a feminist's perspective Anyone who doesnt worship women at this point is labeled as "incel" or "misogynist". They are just buzzwords nowadays so I wouldnt worry about it. I j…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:24 PM
9

What do think about the idea of a female "sex therapist"? Do think they can actually give helpful advice to men who struggle to get women and sex? To women, yes. Not to men tho. Majority of the time, the men who can make them feel safe and protected are not the men who can give them thrill. She will give you advice on how to be the "nice guy" but I'm 100% sure she cant give effective advice on how to get laid as a man. Unless she can give you an advice on how to be "the chad who behaves like a h…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:40 PM
1

There is no defending thats happening at all. As I pointed out, me personally(and im sure many other men do), we do hold men to the same standard as women when it comes to promiscuity https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1699mjp/men_are_not_hypocrites_on_bodycount_and_here_is/ And it's not bad for wanting a man who can financially support her Uhmm. Nobody said its bad(maybe others did but not me and not in our conversation). I am simply pointing out that the "married couple survey" is si…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 01:54 PM
2

because you also have to take hypergamy into account.(yes not all x are y, but in general woman marry men who earn more than them). an avg woman doesnt want an avg man. the survey, being conducted on married couples means it marginally eliminated the men on the lower mean bracket. it eliminated the guys who didnt even have a chance to be in a relationship in the first place. and as you move to the higher bracket, you move towards men who may not earn as much as elon but still earn around 6 figs.…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 11:27 AM
1

high value men cheat more than woman. aka guys like elon musk, leo dicaprio. pick out a random construction worker or an it guy on your local mall and there is a 1/3 chance of him being a virgin or sexless for more than a year. You can easily hook up via text and face to face if she's just looking for sex I hate to break it to you but the online-dating experience for males is HUGELY different from the female's experience. and if you really believe an avg guy can get laid as easily as an avg girl…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:23 AM
1

Then clearly you did not read the post.As I pointed out, men are also shamed for promiscuity.https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1699mjp/men_are_not_hypocrites_on_bodycount_and_here_is/ You are confusing difficulty vs acceptability. If someone manages to kidnap the president, that feat is impressive. But that doesnt mean its acceptable to just run around and kidnap people. Yes, some men praise other men for being promiscuous - but thats because for men its not just simply "give consent …
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:37 AM
7

Because it has lost its meaning and became more like a buzzword. Same to "insecure" and "immature".
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:51 PM
15

traditional gender roles existed due to hatred of women traditional gender roles like chivalry, giving up your sit for a woman standing on a bus, working a 9-5 job in order to provide for the wife and kids, letting women go first(assuming there are no children) when the boat sinks. these roles suggest hate for women?????????????
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:34 AM
8

if the patriarchy still exists you wouldnt find any male garbagemen nor male oil rig workers.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:02 PM
9

Not really. At this point incel just really means a man who is not willing to be a simp or a whiteknight. Nowadays if you dont worship women, you are basically an "iNCeL". We cannot disagree on a woman’s ability to make decision Correct! But that doesnt mean men are no longer allowed to make a valid judgement, especially when it is backed up by statistics and psychological studies. I support the idea of "my body my choice". But I also support the idea of "my observation my conclusion".
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:01 PM
3

And this point "incel" is really just a buzzword - every feminitard is using it, none of them knows what it means. Just like "insecure" and "misogyny".
/r/MensRights11/09/23 09:55 PM
6

simps culture
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:04 AM
1

Men dont have the option to take custody of the baby by default (he has to fight for it and majority of the time, the court denies it) So he can just ask for child support from the mother I agree with you men should use birth control. But so should women. Also, if you plan to open your legs, might as well bring a condom and give to the guy your making out with.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:41 PM
4

Abortion is illegal in red states That still doesnt change the fact that majority of men are the ones paying child support.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:36 PM
2

> She was seen as bitchy and complicated by older male Did they say this out loud? If yes she should sue. If not then you are probably a mind reader. And to be fair, Ive also seen the opposite. Women could get promoted by dating the boss. There is a reason why "her knees hurt after promotion" memes exists. This rarely happens to men.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:28 PM
23

According to women, we can have sex without being shamed feminitards are wrong on this one. think about it: any mother would be ashamed of a promiscuous son. any daughter would be ashamed of a promiscuous father. thats why majority of men discourage women from going after playboy-type dudes. BUT INSTEAD women do the exact opposite, it is women who WANT to chase playboys.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:03 AM
20

no wonder western women grow up to be........you know..
/r/MensRights29/08/23 10:28 PM
13

incel = he is making valid arguments that i cant deny therefor ill call him names. im happily married to a woman who doesnt take selfies and loves to cook, feminists cant stand it lol. and yup they still call me incel and i just laugh at it 🤣.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:17 AM
22

misogyny at this point is just a buzzword. every feminist use it without knowing what it actually means.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:08 AM
7

if your wellbeing is not part of her interest, shes not the one. there is a difference between "expecting" a divorce and acknowledging the possibility. the same reason why malls have fire extinguishers on the side. to me it sounds like you are her "the one in the meantime".
/r/MensRights24/08/23 04:17 PM
2

i second this. college grad here but if i could do over id go to trade school. college curiculum contains waaaay to many filler subjects like philosophy and history
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:20 AM
109

why should boys work hard when they know theyd still be disposable men in the future anyway
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:53 PM
17

to be fair. if its a male judge its an auto bye bye for you as well(in general) .at least female judges arent guaranteed to be a white knight - they can still be, but not as slim of a chance when compared to male judges.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:02 PM
18

thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! finally someone pointed it out
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:00 PM
1

to be fair. its easier to count that the things they dont hate compared to the things they hate.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:57 PM
1

If a woman does not, she’s a “bitch.” you made this part up lol
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:15 AM
15

They are confusing "difficulty" vs "acceptability". Promiscuity does not "raise" your value as a man. Male promiscuity however is an INDICATOR of being a high value man.But no, i wouldnt "encourage" male promiscuity ever. If I acted like a pig and slept with different women every weekend, my mom and my sister would both exile me from family gatherings.And my wife probably wouldnt even consider having a relationship with me. Think about this, if you manage to kidnap the president alone, that is i…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:46 AM
1

Sounds fair to me. If my future daughter manages to snag a millionaire then she should. But to claim "its not gold digging" its just brainwashing at this point.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter