TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

barnagotte Archive

View 1 post and 107 comments by barnagotte on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1102

Discriminationbarnagotte/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

How is this a Mens Rights issues, when it's the same regardless of the gender? MGTOW much?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:22 PM
-3

LOL. Your link is ONLY about intimate partner violence. No shit 98% people are straight, so in domestic violence, it's mostly hetero. Your own link specifies "According to NISVS, perpetrators of rape and unwanted sexual contact against male victims were mostly other men" "Women were mostly the perpetrators of intimate partner violence against men." no shit... I said men and women are equal in DV, not equal in rape, iand your own link proves me right. LOL;.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:45 PM
-6

You're right on DV (wich I didn't mention) and incredibly wrong on all other counts. Google is your friend. Also, you make me laugh to your 40 to 80%, as if that meant anything.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:09 PM
-14

Buuuuuullshiiiiiiit. Men are mostly raped, assaulted, battered and killed, by other men. 80% of child molesters are male. It's not by lying through your teeth that you're gonna help the cause.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:19 AM
-3

Yeah, and in return women carry babies, take care of children, old people, sick people, and manage domestic work. Sounds fair to me.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:20 AM
1

"what about equality?"
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:19 AM
2

Yes I meant contraception. Pardon my french.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:07 PM
1

That's silly, "aborting" a few minutes before birth is akin to murdering the baby a few minutes after birth. What reasons are you thinking about??
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:08 PM
5

Literally, yes, but if we use "birth control" as "contraception" (wich we usually do), then no.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:07 PM
2

Well, that would be horrifying....
/r/MensRights14/02/22 02:23 PM
2

It's not a kid.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 02:22 PM
2

You didn't answer my question. Even if it were a jury that forces a woman to carry on a pregnancy, HOW do you suggest they enforce it?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:50 PM
-18

How facetious.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:49 PM
-1

If the father is allowed to opt out.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:12 PM
-25

WTF??? It's called accidental pregnancy! What does rape have to do with anything? (Also one can and should take the mornign after pill after a rape...)
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:11 PM
0

That's absolutely bonkers. It's litteraly infanticide.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:10 PM
2

And how do you suggest the father chooses to keep it if the woman doesn't want? Jail her? Put her in tight cuffs so that she can't hurt her belly in any way? Force a tube down her throat if she threatens not to feed?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:09 PM
-3

So when the baby is born, how does it feed and dress and live without money?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:05 PM
3

The sentence "no uterus, no opinion" is stupid AF. Of course you can have an opinion. But you still can't get to decide. It should be "No uterus, no decision".
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:05 PM
0

No time limit? Like up to the delivery room?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:04 PM
3

This. If the child is born, its interest trumps all others. It sucks, but it is what it is.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:03 PM
5

I can't believe the results. No time limit? Litterally zero country in the world has such kind of laws.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:02 PM
0

He litterally just said you should wear a condom.... you're not all right....
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:02 PM
-26

Virtually noone uses it as a form of birth control....
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:00 PM
0

Are you really gonna call an embryo "a child"? Not even a potential child, or a future possible child?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:00 PM
5

pregnancy IS a life altering process.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 11:58 AM
1

What does it mean "having a say"? I mean, he can give his opinion all right, but how woud that opinion have any impact on the continuation or not of the pregnancy?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 11:56 AM
1

If you want taxes to pay for the baby, you know it's still men as a whole that are used as an ATM? I'd rather tax the concerned party. And I'm not a feminist. AT ALL. I hate feminism.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 11:47 AM
1

But it's gonna be one if it's not aborted, so the man will end up with a live baby, wether he wants it or not, and the baby needs money. Sorry, it may be unfair to the man but the interest of the child trumps it all.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 07:46 AM
1

I don't care if it's a woman, a man or a non-binary pal carrying the embryo/foetus, they should be the sole party choosing to keep it or not. Their uterus, their choice. When everyone gets an uterus or when babies grow ex-utero, both parties can have a choice. Inside of you -> you get to decide. Not because you're a woman. Because it's inside of you. There is no biological equality. Biology knows no bigotry.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 07:24 PM
1

Because a non-aborted foetus WILL become a live baby with needs. Are you dense?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:00 PM
0

Yes because the baby is gonna be taken care of by other people... still not the same thing. Also how is that "an excuse" that we have an uteerus and you don't?? If I tell you "I can't do X I have cramps/my period/i'm pregnant" are you gonna say I use biology as an excuse?? What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:31 PM
1

For the second one, of course single dads should get exactly the same help as single moms (even more maybe, since single women get a tonshit of advantages not only through legal means but through.... evolutionnary psychology let's say). For the first one, I can tell this is unfair, a man cannot "adopt out" when a woman can. I have no answer except that it comes with the uterus. Some things will always be unfair. Due to basic biology...
/r/MensRights12/02/22 01:19 PM
0

The difference is, when a woman aborts, there is no baby to care for, no "superior interest of the child". When a man "financially aborts" a live baby, there is a baby, that needs to feed and dress, and the child is penalised unfairly. The child's interest must ALWAYS trump all others'. The two things cannot be equated. Abortion = no baby. Financial abandonment = live child with no money to live.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:04 AM
-2

How should I know?? Not a lot.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:59 AM
1

There's almost no woman on this group LOL
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:58 AM
-4

There's not a lot of women on this group.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 09:00 PM
-3

They're not on this group.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 08:59 PM
2

I believe in abortion as per the laws in my country allow it, that means in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy if no issue ; all throughout the pregnancy in cases of medical issues. I see no circumstance where those rules should'nt apply. Do you? I also believe pro-lifers believe in life at conception (they think the frigging embryo is a human being) but that's not what I've read here. I've not read it's murder, I've not read it's unfair to the 'baby', i've read it's unfair to the MAN. What do you …
/r/MensRights11/02/22 08:57 PM
41

A lot of men here are anti-abortion or play devil's advocates with anti-abortion talking points. That sometimes makes it difficult for me (us?) in here.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:50 PM
533

I'm an angry woman. Angry at how men are treated.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 02:16 PM
-14

Man, you're SO confused. Of course you have no say, it's in HER BLOODY UTERUS! Come on! Your "precious" DNA is also in paper tissues when you masturbaten and on your tootbrush and toilet bowl! Ugh. Such a tired talking point. . anyway I do believe in a woman's right to CHOOSE, and you should be ashamed that you don't. Men are not allowed to opt out of paternity because it's A CHILD that's involved and he needs to feed! Abortion involves no child whatsoever. You cannot equate the two, it's just b…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:03 PM
-13

It is a medical procedure, it is a side effect that the embryo/foetus dies, it doesn't "count" as alive since it cannot live outside of the womb, you should wear condoms if you want a child, every sexual intercourse comes with the risk of pregnancy... those are all facts.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:20 PM
-15

I think it might have been an embryo, not a kid.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:18 PM
-1

Monogamy is a joke.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:03 PM
1

Duh.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 02:03 PM
1

It's actually a pretty excellent list.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:57 PM
0

OP you're braindead.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:42 PM
1

You LITTERALLY said that it would be better if there was no treatments for mental illnesses!
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:31 PM
1

You realize that insulin doesn't treat diabetes, right? What's that ableist, hateful point you're making here?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:30 PM
2

Yeah, they "believe", they "claim", they "argue". All of it is 1000% horsecrap.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:22 PM
3

Are you even serious...?!
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:15 PM
3

No it doesn't. So search up.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:58 PM
-2

Yes, and circumcision is not sexual.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:46 AM
-10

It's not a sexual assault (cause it doesn't have any sexual component/intention). It's a genital mutilation. Wich is a million times worse.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 03:42 AM
20

No, it's NOT a religious rite in christianity, NOT WHATSOEVER. Unless you think Kellog has replaced Jesus Christ as the prophet of Christianity? It is religious for Jews and muslims. Femal Genital Mutilation is also a century long tradition in a lot of cultures. We don't allow it in the western world : just like that. It can be done. No excuse.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 03:39 AM
-6

You're petty and childish and pretty stupid too. This was a perfectly normal, understandable question, and didn't even imply in any way that you didn't have custody. I mean 50/50 means you see your children half of the time... And a full custody would be very abnormal. Men do get screwed over in family courts. It's a fact. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:51 PM
-8

Your two "points" are not related in anyway. You sound confused.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:37 PM
1

Except in the states it has nothing to do with religion (unless you thing Kelogg was a prophet?)
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:52 PM
2

Also, there's nothing you can do about FGM in thirld world countries in a distant continent that is so deeply ingrained in their culture and religion. While in the USA, people just need a gentle nudge of EDUCATION to abstain from mutilating their sons forever. That's where activism should lie!
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:45 AM
9

Thing is, female circumcision is NOT an issue in the US, or very marginally so. While male circumcistion impacts millions baby boys a year, maims thousands and kill hundreds. The priority should lie where it should lie : MGM is the more pressing issue in the western world.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:43 AM
63

He was exposed thouroughly by the excellent and real Dr Todd Grande, psychologist, in this four videos : 10 "Dr Phil" mistakes we can all learn from : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLZqMgu4zMo Is Phil McGraw Good for Mental Health? : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSSXSYV7cFQ Phil McGraw Interview Analysis : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r073eeGR78Q Does Phil McGraw Have Magic Lie Detectors? : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-q5vdQSbG8 I recommend!
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:58 PM
1

lol i'm a woman and partnered but sure.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:12 PM
2

Why "supposed" ? It's basic biology!
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:51 PM
4

Yes. Ex wives lying about domestic violence or even pedophilia to get full custody in court.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:29 AM
1

Women are easy to manipulate. Women spend more as they dont save but irresponsibly spend it all. Pretty sure you were talking about all women, not feminists.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:32 PM
5

Exactly what I thought as I was typing my explanation! Spot-on!
/r/MensRights22/08/21 12:55 PM
0

It's just, like, your opinion, bro.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:55 AM
5

Are you for real??
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:01 AM
2

You're not a MRA, you're just a woman hater.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:59 AM
3

I'm (kinda) new to reddit.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:58 AM
3

I don't know why I let it bother me so much.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:56 AM
3

r/ihavesex
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:54 AM
7

Ok it means that, as a woman,, you defend men only to be noticed, praised, and "picked" by said men. It means that you cant' possibly believe what you're saying but you're just saying it to look good in the eyes of men.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:52 AM
19

FDS is legit a hate group.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:48 AM
3

Yeah, just today I've been told " MY ENTIRE HISTORY POST IS MISOGYNISTIC RETHORIC" (she's super fast reading through my entire history post in a few minutes, ain't she?) and I'm sooo confused cause I legit don't have one mysoginistic comment. Then I realize she just saw my post in Men's Rights. That's enough for her to call me a mysogynist.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:47 AM
2

I was down to -100 when I got an award and a lot of upvotes, from this post I guess? Or do award count as upvotes, don't know.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:42 AM
1

I believe in the western world it's up to 95% of homicides that are commited by males. I don't know more about it than a google search, though. I do know mothers commit a lot more infanticides than fathers, though.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 08:10 PM
-2

Well I didn't know Jordan Peterson and Stephen Pinker were feminist sources LOL
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:51 PM
-1

What in the...?!!
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:50 PM
78

Oh also, I just discovered I'm a "pick-me" for all of that!
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:44 PM
1

this!
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:56 PM
2

That's the very prejudices, very misandrist way in wich the justice system works. Because "the man penetrates" "the man has to be hard" "the man always wants it", "she would have never..." "she's not that type of girl...." It actually makes my blood boil.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:54 PM
-5

I don't know what's wrong with the word incel, it describes an attitude that I believe I read in u/Diligent-Education64's comment. We all know that consent ed programs are super prejudiced against men, but going as far as to say that girls are "brainswashed" into crying rape all the time for no reasons is going too far, and incel talk, IMO.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:52 PM
-1

I completely agree and regret that. But saying sex ed is teaching the Mary Koss way is uselessly inflammatory.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:49 PM
0

I agree consent programs are needlessly gendered and extremely misandrists. But I can imagine such a thing as a good consent program that really adresses both genders in their common and their individual problematics.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:44 PM
-7

No they just don't commit homicide (almost never). Very little violent crimes, in fact. This has nothing to do with "being wonderful".
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:40 PM
-3

I don't have any? Learning how to say no is a lifetime's job, supposedly especially for women, cause we're way more agreeable on the big 5 model ; or people's pleaser if you will.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:36 PM
11

They say "teach the concept of consent" not "teach the concept of consent to boys". It's very important and could very well help with some particular instance of rape ( i'd call them "gray-area".) Teaching young people about how, when and why to give consent as well as how, when and why deny it or remove it ; and finally how and when to detect problematic consent ; would be super beneficial in both reducing rape instances and reducing "regret accusations" - and reducing bad sex instances overall…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:20 PM
-5

But since sex ed is overall very virtuous, and could maybe help prevent some "gray-area" "rapes", why not support it all the way?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:16 PM
2

Aaaaand.... there's where sex ed comes in! ALSO to teach women how to be more straightforward and aware about their own desires and needs.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:06 PM
-12

This is incel talking. Try to stay on point.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:05 PM
-10

Many women say yes or don't say no because they don't dare to or they do,n't know how to ; sex ed could help with those gray-zone areas.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:04 PM
-25

80-90% of rapists are the victim's SO or date, someone already attracted sexually to the person they're gonna rape, not random psychopaths roaming the streets looking for the most unconsenting person. Also the theory that rapists are turned on by the lack of consent itself and not "just" sexual horniness is completely contradicted by the mere fact that : straight men rape women, ages 14-50 ; gay men rape other men, ages 14-50. If rapists were specifically looking for lack of consent, their victi…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:03 PM
-1

MM actually yes, with something like 80-90% of rapes being commited by the victim's SO or date, I think that there is a VERY strong link between rape and the understanding of consent.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:57 PM
-15

Women do commit very little crimes though. Almost no homicide, wich is already something!
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:53 PM
5

Confessions.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:22 PM
-2

It's just basic evolutionnary psychology. Biologically speaking, men are a luxury.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:43 PM
1

How could it?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:43 PM
19

Except it's circular thinking : if they're a victim, of course believe them. But how do you know they're a victim in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:40 PM
0

It is, in fact, absolutely IMPOSSIBLE to know for a fact how many are false. But we knwo for a fact most rapes are not even reported.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:39 PM
9

Because it's almost impossible to prove rape, it happens behind closed doors. It's 95% he said-she said. No conviction can (or should) be obtained under those circumstances.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:39 PM
6

Thank God!
/r/MensRights10/08/21 08:04 PM
17

I'm so sorry for you....
/r/MensRights10/08/21 08:03 PM
1

That is sus. It's notorious that a large proportion of suicide for men is 1/hanging 2/guns. And that it's two means that almost no woman ever resorts to.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 06:30 PM
-2

I don't think women attempt suicide less. It's not because you miss yourself that it was just a "cry for help". Maybe it was a genuine death wish. But since women won't use violent means, they fail more often. The fact that we do'nt use violent means doesn't mean we don't really want to die... there may be other psychological factors at play.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:25 PM
2

That's some level of stretching.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter