TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

barryjordan586 Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by barryjordan586 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

"Look at one of the most rich, famous, ambitious, powerful person in human history" Even he has gotten divorced a few times, I believe
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 02:23 PM
18

Aside from the other answers in this thread, remember that there are a much higher percentage of ND men than ND women. Supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 11:09 PM
21

If even ND girls don't want to date ND guys, then I highly doubt NT girls would either. Are ND guys just completely screwed? I ask this as an ND guy myself, and I think I know the answer...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 11:02 PM
1

Creepy behavior is something that is out of the ordinary and makes a woman feel like you might represent a threat. The obvious reason for this asymmetry is because men are a physical threat to women to an outsized degree. But it's often not creepy if it' a guy that's extremely good looking, compared to if a guy is ugly. So the physical threat argument doesn't hold up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 11:14 PM
1

If the definition of creepy is unattractive men then by definition women or attractive men are incapable of being creepy. But you agree that’s not true He said earlier, it's just that the degree is lower. An attractive guy, or women, can get away with a lot of behavior that your average or ugly guy doing it would be creepy. For example, an ugly guy approaching a girl at the mall may be creepy. But a guy who is extremely good looking approaching a girl at the mall (same bodylanguage, same words, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 11:12 PM
12

Projection. Just like they hate when men "rate" women on their looks but deep down do the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 11:09 PM
2

I disagree. If you're unattractive, confidence can actually work against you. "Arrogant, napoleon complex, etc." It's a lose-lose I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 09:24 PM
1

It may be possible sometimes, but generally speaking, my comment stands. If you have exceptionally high charisma, or exceptionally low charisma, sure, maybe. (Or are exceptionally attractive, eg good face and body despite being short). But for the vast majority of men, that's the exception and not the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:28 PM
10

Being physically attractive makes you look confident, not the other way around. A tall good looking guy who talks a lot is outgoing, confident, etc. But a short, ugly guy who talks a lot of boisterous, arrogant, and overcompensating.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 05:26 PM
–

Agreed. Another projection I see is women saying "men feel entitled" to sex or relationships. Meanwhile, some of these same women will say other women (and themselves) deserve guys with XYZ amazing qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 11:26 PM
2

Just start spitting everywhere close to them
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 12:27 AM
2

That makes sense (unfortunately)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 07:16 PM
1

Again, vast overgeneralization, from some hateful people. You have yet to say what about the community, ideology, or identification itself is an issue that supposedly turns anyone who identifies as such into a hateful person.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 06:53 PM
0

The definition does matter because you're generalizing an entire group of people without even having a definition of it. So anyone who identifies as "incel" on reddit or elsewhere is a "terrible human being" by that logic because of some nasty messages you got? I've gotten nasty messages from people who hang out on redpill forums, but I don't suggest that anyone who identifies as a "redpiller" is a terrible person because I understand that there's nothing inherently terrible about the ideology o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 06:27 PM
3

But what is your definition? Involuntarily celibate means someone who wants to date, but hasn't been able to, so by that definition that person is an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 05:41 PM
2

Okay. That doesn't take "tremendous time, energy, and abstinence." If you're young, and have decent or good genetics, then simply NOT routinely overindulging in horrible habits or food is all it takes. Having good health is genetic to an extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:45 PM
5

I can understand not wanting to date them, sure. But why "hate" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 11:44 AM
9

Do you consider anyone who hasn't dated someone an incel? If so, why do you hate them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:55 AM
6

Sure pretty people can post there, but that's fair game to be roasted for fishing for compliments. The roast is harsh, and long, but it's still a roast. EDIT: he briefly mentions "it's common for girls like you drift aimlessly..." But for the most part he talks about her, specifically, the entire time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:50 AM
4

He clearly roasted her specifically for fishing for compliments on a roastme subreddit, and for not having anything to offer aside from a pretty face. It's a harsh roast, like it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:47 AM
2

Having a pretty face (we don't even know about body) as a girl is genetics and makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:43 AM
9

He roasted her, specifically, because she posted on roastme as a stereotypically attractive person, clearly fishing for compliments (he said this in the very first sentence of the roast). Aside from fishing for compliments in bad faith, he roasted her for not having anything to offer aside from her pretty face. It's absolutely a roast, albeit harsh, whether you agree with the roast or not. Suggesting it's not a roast is just bizarre denial on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:35 AM
23

Roasting someone on a roast-me board makes him jealous? What about his post is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:03 AM
1

Ok. Doesn't negate the rest of my comment after the first two sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 05:07 PM
4

Danny Devito is a rich famous actor. In fact, she met him at a play he was featured in. Besides, exceptions don't negate the rule. Also, they split up a few months ago (though not officially divorced). So no. She'll find someone better looking now that her social status is higher (thanks to marrying Danny Devito). Sure, he was good enough for her when they married decades ago, but the dating market has drastically changed for the worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 11:20 AM
10

Creepy is codeword for ugly. Ugly guy sitting alone in the bar who looks in your direction? Creepy. Chad sitting alone in the bar who looks at you? Mysterious, flirtations. Etc
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 03:59 PM
3

Yes it's an Apex fallacy. Girls, naturally, are chasing the top tier men, and of course top tier men have plenty of options. Average or ugly men are not even on girl's radars, so they wouldn't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 05:30 PM
0

I read it and disagree. Your anecdotes to the contrary don't change my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 03:48 AM
2

Yep, supply and demand unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 02:54 AM
0

I think people are just attracted to physically attractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 02:44 AM
12

I feel like on top of having excellent game you have to be very physically attractive to pull it off, and even then, you're competing with endless swipes with online dating. So, don't think it's great now. I agree late 90s early 2000s was the best time for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 02:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter