~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | Rules for thee but not for meI know but the two aren’t equal! Rape could seriously fuck you up both mentally and physically, that’s why consent is required. But circumcision would just leave you with different-looking genitalia depending on the culture. I’m not really sure how you could possibly equate the two. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/18 11:53 PM |
| -6 | Rules for thee but not for meAn infant can’t consent though, so are you saying we should just do away with it all together? That would be a respectable position to take. My issue is equating consent for sex to consent for circumcision, since those are two very different things. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/18 11:39 PM |
| -6 | Rules for thee but not for meI am okay with both, that’s the parents choice. Obviously an infant can’t “consent” in the same way a grown woman can to sex, so I’m not quite understanding the parallels here. I don’t think you can equate consent for sex to that of male/female circumcision because they’re two very different things. Rape could leave someone with ptsd/depression/a whole list of other possible health issues like STI’s, and the other just leaves you with different-looking genitalia. So it’s pretty obvious why one w… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/18 11:28 PM |
| -9 | Rules for thee but not for meWait WHOA, whoa, whoa...how on earth did you get that from me saying I’m okay with circumcision??? Obviously you’re right about that, but those are two completely different things dude, you can’t equate the two. Like what’s your point even? | /r/MensRights | 03/09/18 11:14 PM |
| -62 | Rules for thee but not for meYea wait. I’d rather be circumcised than not. Like I’m cool with this one. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/18 09:24 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter