TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bat_in_the_stacks Archive

View 1 post and 56 comments by bat_in_the_stacks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
33

Fathers/Custodybat_in_the_stacks/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:26 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-10

I don't feel harmed in any way. I really want to see Harris crush Trump in a debate. Only an ancient character like him would respond to this language anyway.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:59 AM
11

She's not "telling people". She's directly talking to Corporal Bone Spurs. She's goading him into debating, which every presidential candidate normally agrees to unquestioningly. It's not like she gives speeches deriding men.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 12:54 AM
-1

It seems like very few understood that if you follow the implications of the story, it is anti modern feminism. Ken starts out as an analogue of a real world woman from first or second wave feminism. His selfish and demeaning patriarchy takeover in barbie world is a condemnation of current feminism.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:27 PM
13

It was also not internally consistent. Will Ferrell's character is all over the place depending on what's needed for the plot.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:12 PM
-5

What she did was have no reason to own a compact portable device that can kill someone without requiring effort, training, or skill. When such devices are commonplace, as is very obvious here, they will get used more often and more people will senselessly die. The Constitution is not a justification. It's just a legal decision that was made almost two and half centuries ago by fallible human beings in a context that no longer exists. The interpretation of the one sentence statement isn't even br…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 05:22 PM
17

But, begun the clone war has
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:44 AM
3

The Shape isn't gone after all!
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:28 PM
32

Take your politics elsewhere with this misleading headline. Anyone who needs a TL;DR from the article, Totally separate from the main rape allegation, the Senate was sent an anonymous letter with a separate rape allegation. After that was entered into the public record, a women came forward on October 3rd claiming to be the letter writer. By November 1st, the committee successfullly arranged a phone call with the woman, who then admitted she didn't write the letter and never interacted with Kava…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:10 AM
-19

No, it's selfish because you leave a huge hole behind you that all who cared about you have to deal with. It would only not be selfish if no one misses you when you're gone and no one has to find your dead body. I personally also think someone willing to die should go out trying to do something helpful for the world. Leave things a little better than you found them.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 10:00 AM
-2

He's also a trump supporter, so there's clearly no point in entertaining his views.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:59 AM
-6

All the men posting on here reveling in abortion restrictions really aren't thinking this through. When the woman is forced to carry the pregnancy to term, the father is going to have to pay child support for a couple of decades and deal with the emotional and time issues around raising the child or the fact that the child exists. You're really cutting off your nose to spite your face.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:31 PM
2

Toward the end, the video narrator says the woman involved is a military veteran, so trained in fighting.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 04:55 PM
1

Bringing race into this is an absurd distraction. You're making it sound like they're forced abortions.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 08:07 PM
-1

They need someone to take care of all the unwanted pregnancies after his abortion restrictions.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:56 PM
3

I would look forward to that day more than xmas.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:37 AM
6

There will be enough women left at home that "the womb of the nation" will be preserved.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:47 AM
1

That's the stall with no door.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 04:39 AM
7

The point here is more of a legal/support issue, I think. The idea being women rightfully can decide on whether they have the baby but men get no choice on whether they make a 20+ year commitment to the child.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:21 PM
2

" Authorities from other states support imposition of a child support obligation upon a minor who has been the victim of unlawful sexual intercourse. State ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer (1993) 252 Kan. 646 [847 P.2d 1273, 1278], held that a 13-year-old boy`s presumed lack of consent to intercourse under criminal statutes was irrelevant in paternity and child support proceedings. "
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:22 AM
8

Yes, either it's the idea that it's both attributes that are striking - woman and skin color, or it's that a black man did it already and now the next novelty is a black woman doing it.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 05:27 PM
1

Also, it is partially about controlling women (and to a certain degree men. Considering birth control not holy and abortion immoral, along with people naturally having a sex drive, means you drive people into unwanted parenthood and the status quo. Those in power, economically or religiously, need their wage slaves and congregants. They don't want people independent financially or in thought or action.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:26 PM
1

All things as they are now, I weight the thoughtful decision of the adult parents over the inherent rights of the fetus. In the case of the health of the mother, that should always be the case. In the case of the child being unwanted for some reason, if there were sufficient support programs in place for both the mother and the child through it's whole childhood into adulthood, I might change my mind. As is, there's a lot of focus on bringing the baby into the world and then making its life and …
/r/MensRights25/09/20 04:58 PM
1

Would you deny that at least several geographically contiguous states or very large states would make abortion illegal, functionally denying it to many women? Do you think that men's lousy paternity treatment will get better with abortion being illegal? In the last time period abortion was illegal, a man was supposed to marry a woman if they accidentally conceived a child together.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:17 PM
6

This was published 27 years ago and is likely the voice of a character in the book. Atwood's not really the moralizing omniscient narrator type. She's much more show than tell.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:09 PM
1

What about a woman who would make it illegal for other women to control their own bodies? Fun fact: making abortions illegal also hurts men.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:04 PM
1

We don't know how much (if at all) Atwood is endorsing this view, but the message to define one's own self worth and meaning of success is a good one. I'd say making "males" the boogeyman doesn't fit well in current times, but we don't know what time period this statement was made in. It's very believable that a woman could sensibly feel this way if you go back into the 70s and the book was apparently written in '93 and covers decades of the past (based on wikipedia). It also seems to be about p…
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:00 PM
1

Sorry guys. Between the impending overturning of Rowe v Wade and the state opposition to BLM, this is not the right time to be insulting Margaret Atwood.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 01:38 PM
-2

Is DeVos fighting accusations of racism by getting melanin injections?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 03:48 AM
5

I'm going to selfishly argue that single parents get some appreciation on both days. Believe me, a lot of the time I feel like I'm trying to live two people's lives as a single parent.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:19 PM
1

https://www.lailalaurel.co.uk/a-solution-for-man-spreading It seems more like an art project than anything.
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 07:56 PM
1

Are the captions real? Why would the "women's chair" have that wedge in the middle?
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 07:52 PM
1

I meant the tweet/tweeter, not you.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:10 PM
-1

Isn't this tweet playing into a rediculous trope of lesbians being man haters? I mean, they're not into women because they hate men. Edited to clarify I meant the twitter post.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:03 PM
1

You're really missing the point. The only way this is fair is if both parents have the right to opt out unilaterally. Women have the right to do this now via abortion and very likely by careful presentation of adoption information. Some people on here think that both genders should have no right to opt out, and to that I'd just say you're dooming people to unhappy lives and all that does to negatively ripple through the lives of those around them. If you require both parents to agree on what the…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:54 PM
4

Isn't what you're describing as a paper abortion for women accomplished by adoption or leaving the child at a safe haven?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:31 PM
3

It doesn't seem that solid legally. This talks about the steps a father has to take to have rights in the adoption decision. https://family.findlaw.com/paternity/parental-rights-unmarried-fathers-and-adoption.html We know the father does not have rights in the abortion decision. And this is all on the side of the father wanting to keep the child. If the father wants to have no responsibility or relationship with the child, that is not an option, while it is for the mother.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:25 PM
23

You've never seen people write "womyn" because of that? From dictionary.com womyn[ wim-in ] plural noun women (used chiefly in feminist literature as an alternative spelling to avoid the suggestion of sexism perceived in the sequence m-e-n).
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:58 PM
49

People who think consent can't be withdrawn for future parts of having sex really need to re-evaluate their morals. Retroactively withdrawing consent makes no sense, but if either party says "stop", the other needs to stop.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:37 AM
8

It looks like this is being interpreted backwards. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetwburns/2019/04/22/north-carolina-may-finally-let-women-revoke-consent-during-sex/ Current law does not allow revocation of consent. This is being reconsidered to allow revocation of consent.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:34 AM
2

What's your take on the death penalty?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:48 PM
-1

I think this is likely not well understood. I just heard a female reporter explain it. The time is measured from last period, so the first 4 weeks are basically knocked out immediately and that leaves 2 weeks where you might think you're late or circumstances might delay you getting to the doctor. I believe the way she put it was "two weeks is a business trip".
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:09 PM
-2

The morning after pill is not taken lightly. It messes with the woman's system significantly.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:06 PM
429

Since this ban means that a couple in agreement on getting an abortion also can't get an abortion, maybe we should ease up on this one. Forcing child support from birth isn't fair, but both men and women should be appalled by the state abortion bans.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:18 AM
1

But you made a choice. If you choose to do it, then it's not rape. If you choose to not do it, and your choice is not respected, then it's rape. It doesn't matter if most other guys would choose to. All that matters is the two people in the one encounter. What don't you understand about this?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:41 PM
1

Well, I said foreign because I wanted to avoid falling into an argument over "Russian" attacks on American political discourse, vs. "Chinese" attacks vs. whoever else people are for or against. In terms of referring to fake/disingenuous accounts, I was trying to be optimistic, because if these are genuinely held opinions, the people behind them are jerks with blinders on. Progressives in general absolutely are not the enemy of men or white people. There are extremist fools in any group, but the …
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:24 AM
12

White people without college degrees (Republican core voters) benefit most from the social programs championed by Democrats. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/gop-base-poverty-snap-social-security/516861/ "in both percentage terms and absolute numbers, federal programs reduced poverty among working-age whites without a college degree more than they did among non-college-educated Hispanics, African Americans, or members of other races, and far more than they did among college-e…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:54 PM
-9

I really hope most of the comments in here are from foreign fake accounts. I know this sub is about pointing out people being unfair to men, but most progressives want to raise up the less fortunate masses by taking the ultrarich down a peg. Think of it as 2 mansions are enough. White and don't own a mansion? Then Medicare for all, higher minimum wage, etc. are there to help you, not defeat your pipe dreams of becoming a billionaire.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:43 PM
3

Please don't try to throw Men's Rights behind Kavanaugh. Maybe before the Senate testimony, you could argue that we'll never know the truth (and we won't unless Mark Judge remembers it and cracks). But Kavanaugh's Senate testimony was full of ridiculous dissembling. Oh, I was in football camp, how could I go to a party? Oh, I got good grades at Yale, how could I ever get sloppy drunk? This guy is a liar. His testimony should disqualify him. If you're conservative, advocate for Trump to pick anot…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:48 PM
7

Does anyone else not want to use the urinals in a non-gendered, multi-stall and urinal bathroom? I hit one recently where the former men's and ladies' rooms were renamed "stalls and urinals" and "stalls only". There were women and men mixed together on line in the "stalls and urinals" room right next to the urinals. I found it really awkward.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:56 AM
120

Well, she has my support for Supreme Court Justice.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:36 PM
6

The "she's supposed to be your missus" line was so absurd that this seemed like a sketch in Kids in the Hall or something. The woman was verbally berating the guy for a while, then physically violent. No crowd response. Then the guy pushes her, which is violent, but kind of a "get away from me" violence more than "I want to hurt you" violence, and those guys turn into sports commentators after a good player screws up. "How could he do that? His career is ruined! He's disgraced his coach! Let's s…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 06:33 PM
3

He pushed her from a distance and she kind of gradually fell over. Are we watching the same video?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 06:22 PM
6

Wages when compared to productivity have plummetted. The problem isn't capitalism, it's workers being in a weak bargaining position. If the wave of women entering the workplace was accompanied by widespread union-like demands that full time workers still earn enough to provide for a family, things would have turned out differently. Perhaps there would be more inflationary pressure initially, but I think men and women would likely have shifted toward working less since in marriages/partnerships t…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:04 PM
11

This shows great sacrifice, but not deaths. I don't agree with the implied sentiment of OP, but your post doesn't refute the death part. Still, it's a crazy idea for anyone to not have the right to vote. Women definitely contributed to war efforts in the past and should be drafted if we ever have a draft again.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 03:26 PM
6

This quote from the Go Lang code of conduct shows how crazy things have become. ...examples of “microaggressions”: J is a regular poster to the golang-nuts mailing list. On one thread, they make the comment “Go’s type system is so simple even my grandma could understand it.” Another poster points out that the comment goes against the code of conduct, since it marginalises women and the elderly by implying that something need be simple for an old woman to understand it. J says “Fair point. Sorry …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 10:51 PM
6

Ugh. Obese woman preaching that diet sodas are not ok but juice is.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 05:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter