TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bcat124 Archive

View 8 posts and 75 comments by bcat124 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

Yes but the troubling thing is that women and men lie in opposite ways, women lie to lower their partner counts whereas men lie to inflate it. The fact that surveys show men slightly more likely to be celibate than women means that in truth the difference is much much greater. All survey-based social science is insanely under-estimating male celibacy. Only hard data like dating apps big data show the real picture.
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/19 06:12 AM
18

I think also a big part of it is that single women know in the back of their heads that they could still get someone if they lower their standards enough. Celibacy for women is a choice based on current quality of her pursuers. On the other hand, men are often celibate because no woman wants them, it's a failure to find love from anyone. That's a lot more brutal than choosing to be celibate. Yet another possible factor is that many celibate women are only so temporarily, and don't feel as if the…
/r/BlackPillScience20/05/19 12:23 AM
29

Its so over.
/r/BlackPillScience29/04/19 09:15 PM
18

suifuel for gymcels.
/r/BlackPillScience25/04/19 12:51 PM
12

of course attractiveness was the highest predictor in men. fucking kill me
/r/BlackPillScience14/04/19 10:19 PM
13

cope
/r/BlackPillScience14/04/19 10:18 PM
7

When you have a deep voice + good frame + masculine face with good head shape and lower third, and able to grow a good dense beard, you are attractive, doesn't matter if you're bald or not. there is a small bit of variance for personal preference but the attractiveness is there regardless.
/r/BlackPillScience07/04/19 01:31 AM
24

True. OP is a cuck who tries to gaslight this sub with bad research. This is not his first time either. This research shows the same mistake that all bad research on attractiveness has : they ASKED the women and BELIEVED what they said without any critical pushback. Surprise, turns out women love to virtue signal. This is an unforgivable methodological mistake on this topic. All the good research that looks at number of partners, or women's actual choice rather than their stated preference, find…
/r/BlackPillScience07/04/19 01:09 AM
5

This is the stupidest post I have ever wasted my time reading. You aggregated the data by their rankings, who TF does that? And even in your shitty example, the ugly talented guy had a similar "ranking average" (lol) as a mildly hot untalented guy, which would immediately conclude that attractiveness is indeed a function of this talent. Did you really think your absolutely retarded example would disprove the mountains of research on this sub? L M A O
/r/BlackPillScience06/04/19 11:11 PM
35

very true, that's probably on purpose, the female graph would be so low, it would giga-blackpill so many cucks.
/r/BlackPillScience31/03/19 12:05 AM
1

First, you didn't even read the study pinned did you? Because it looked at the partnering choices women made after TEN speed dating sessions. In which they had ample times to talk, and see each other again and talk again. The hot men alone came out on top. But this is not how men meet partners, generally. That only applies to hook ups. Funny, you just admitted ugly men like me are excluded from hookups, but not women. How do you think I'd feel if I find out my future wife had tons of hookups and…
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 05:13 PM
1

goddamnit I got bated again. Allright here goes. Showing interest was quantified in this study by looking at who is taking initiative to approach the opposite gender, Ugly men approached ugly women much more than hotter women, same goes for hot men with hot women. However, women had very low approach initiative to everyone. This is not due to women not caring about looks, but rather women rarely taking initiative. If you had taken the time to read the study, they actually acknowledge this : Men …
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 04:32 PM
1

I'm sick to my stomach at your kind's constant denial of our lived experiences. Your interpretation is wrong but im tired of pointing it out over and over and over to justify my life. Just fuck you, I don't even know you but I still hate you and wish you only the worse in life
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 03:04 PM
3

If you took the time to read it, it was after TEN speed dating sessions, and the participants were real life adults that had PAID to be there, they were seriously looking for a life partner and there was a follow up after each session. In this experiment however, they were undergraduate students that were told beforehand that this was a research on psychology (they were not seriously looking for a life partner, probably had to do this as part of their curriculum), and there was only one session …
/r/BlackPillScience18/03/19 10:15 PM
5

How the fuck is relying solely on self reported preferences after a fuckin speed dating session with no consequences after the session a "non-existant flaw" you smug piece of shit ?? Especially after all the research that shows, again and again and again, that women's stated preferences are far apart from their actual preferences and real life behaviors?? You're the one ignoring a major methodological flaw and ignoring other research posted in this sub to keep your "women are wonderful" effect g…
/r/BlackPillScience17/03/19 10:08 PM
3

You didn't reply to my second comment, which by itself cancels the conclusion of this research, since it solely relied on women's stated preferences with no follow up with their actual preferences and real life behaviors. Proof that this whole paper with its faulty methodology belongs to the trash is that, in your excerpt, it says that male physical attraction did not predict female attraction, which is in clear contradiction with the very abstract where the paper acknowledges that much research…
/r/BlackPillScience17/03/19 10:03 PM
17

2 problems here : the title is a lie. The research sought the effect of mindfulness beyond physical appearance, as in they do acknowledge that research found attractiveness to be a key predictor, and seek any other predictors after correcting for physical attractiveness. Nowhere do they put the two side by side. All the data was collected from the self-reported answers of the participants with no follow up study to see if anything came of it. JUST FUCKING LOL. literally noting down femoid virtue…
/r/BlackPillScience17/03/19 08:19 PM
10

This is a mindblowing find. I've been thinking exactly of this. This chart still gives a pretty grim picture : either men kill each other for sex, or women select the top men only for sex. There is a third alternative : sexual monogamy like owl monkeys for example.
/r/BlackPillScience17/03/19 08:03 PM
11

its quarantined, not private. You have to access it a first time from the web client to unlock
/r/BlackPillScience14/03/19 01:21 PM
14

all what you said yeah, look up the top posts on braincels, one of them shows an insane transformation thanks to surgery, from incel to chadlite. Some flaws are fixable, some are not.
/r/BlackPillScience14/03/19 12:06 PM
28

The only important determinant of S's liking for his date was the date's physical attractiveness. Holy fucking shit, that whole abstract was just word for word one big black pill. How many times will science journals publish the script of a blackpill YT video before normies wake up?
/r/BlackPillScience14/03/19 11:58 AM
11

Very interesting stuff. I hate females of all species
/r/BlackPillScience10/03/19 02:22 AM
3

Perhaps hot guys who get laid frequently are more likely to develop dark triad personalities because everyone is so lenient on them, and they get praised and complimented often.
/r/askTRP08/03/19 11:25 PM
38

The malingerers were significantly more likely to have a history of murder or rape, carry a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder or sexual sadism, and produce greater PCL-R factor 1, factor 2, and total scores than insanity acquittees who did not malinger. The malingerers were also significantly more likely to be verbally or physically assaultive, require specialized treatment plans to control their aggression, have sexual relations with female staff Maybe if I keep on hating women and g…
/r/BlackPillScience08/03/19 05:42 PM
1

Fat women only count if the man is fat himself. This is the point of a looksmatch. Also fatcels are volcels. I also tried catfishing with 3 Chad pictures. One of a 'normal' Chad, one male model, and one foreign actor that no one in the US had ever heard of. I propositioned women for casual sex and only got one affirmative reply from a woman opening with the fact that she had herpes. I don't believe this for a single second. I have a random chadlite friend and he shows me his conversations with h…
/r/BlackPillScience06/03/19 08:15 PM
1

this might sound ridiculous and absurd to you, but you might wanna chad catfish on an online dating app to get a grip of what insane difference there is. I think a hitch data analyst described the difference between attractive and unattractive men in terms of gini coefficient as being similar to the inequality in south Africa during the apartheid. All women are absolutely bottle-necking onto chad's penis. The reason why chad doesn't receive as much interest as Stacy is because stacy doesn't even…
/r/BlackPillScience06/03/19 07:55 PM
1

this is very hasty conclusion to the data. A few percentage points in reply rates prove absolutely nothing, it is insignificant. HOWEVER, what is not insignificant is the amount of interest each gender shows towards the other. In the same OKcupid studies, it shows females have an insane advantage over males : they get sent hundreds more messages, offered a shitton more opportunities and rated a lot more favorably by men. There is also a lot less inequality between attractive and unattractive wom…
/r/BlackPillScience06/03/19 07:31 PM
1

this is not true. Women care a LOT about looks and often times associate it with status. Also, women have extremely harsh standards for looks, whereas men are a lot more fair. Also, as this study shows, men are willing to lower their standards when they are aware that they themselves aren't too hot, but not women. Women would rather stay alone than lower their standards. There is a reason why 95%+ of complains about forced marriages come from women, there is a reason why 80%+ of divorces are sta…
/r/BlackPillScience06/03/19 07:04 PM
1

it's true, women weren't very reactive to either. Perhaps this is because of women's dating tradition to be approached and seduced, so she remains passive. I will edit the post However if you lurk this sub more, you'll see ample evidence that, even though they don't express it in this study, women are a lot more hypergamous than men and tend to take turns and orbit the most attractive males. This process is called sexual selection by female mate choice.
/r/BlackPillScience06/03/19 06:52 PM
15

Preference for physical attractiveness cannot be measured using our method. This is a joke of a paper. the "observed" preferences were nothing more than another questionnaire, this time rating the attractiveness of people in pictures and trying to somehow induce certain behavioral traits (like sense of humor? and altruism? from somebody's face pic JFL) from these pictures. I'll give an example to highlight the absurdity of this paper: they concluded that men actually care a lot about a woman's w…
/r/BlackPillScience04/03/19 05:41 PM
16

This includes old women that were mainly dating in the 80s. Also, it was self reported and we all know what the research says when it comes to women being honest about their partner count. Isolate this to women between 16 and 30. Add a fale lie detector and ull have a much more grim chart
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/19 09:51 AM
98

Basically femcels. The more chad rejects them, the more they hate us: their looksmatches.
/r/BlackPillScience21/02/19 10:47 PM
24

Translation : alpha fucks beta smiles
/r/BlackPillScience16/02/19 08:09 AM
1

Wtf does this have to do wth the blackpill? Stop spamming the sub with pew polls
/r/BlackPillScience15/02/19 08:17 PM
13

This is a good post but the wrong sub. Blackpillscience is better for research papers and scientific articles, or eventually lay theories that have a scientific base. This post belongs to r/braincels
/r/BlackPillScience10/02/19 09:58 PM
4

It was not proposing a cope, it was proposing a solution. that's what makes it so fucked up in my eyes
/r/BlackPillScience06/02/19 05:39 AM
8

you're a soullesss devil. I refuse to believe people like you have any heart or compassion. I wish you the worse and nothing else in all your life. How fucked up is it, how insanely fucked up most you be that when you learn men suffer deeply from lovelessness and lack of romantic affection, your first reaction is "well you should learn to be happy with your platonic friends that way you stop thinking about the love you'll never get to feel, that'll fix it" I hate you, I hate you, I hate you, I h…
/r/BlackPillScience06/02/19 01:48 AM
0

This is not the place at all you dumbass
/r/BlackPillScience04/02/19 10:07 PM
7

Thank you for this.
/r/BlackPillScience01/02/19 11:50 PM
10

“Perhaps it is not unexpected that having many partners increases the odds of divorce. The greater surprise is that this only holds true in recent years; previously, women with two partners prior to marriage had the highest divorce rates,” This is only true for : couples who married in the 1980s and only accounts for divorce 5 years after the marriage. Based on personal testimony ofc and we all know what the research says on women's honesty in reporting their sexual partners. This is weak
/r/BlackPillScience30/01/19 06:46 PM
1

I might be retarded but from the graph, men have a lower risk of divorce as the ration of women in the occupational sector goes up, unlike women
/r/BlackPillScience28/01/19 01:11 PM
17

I like to hangout with boys cuz there's less drama teehee
/r/BlackPillScience28/01/19 12:22 PM
12

This article grossly conflates choosiness and promiscuity in females, all the while greatly over estimating male selectiveness, bullshit liberally biased article that tries to make it seem as if females and males are the same. Yes, many females are promiscious, but waht this asshole didn't mention ONCE in the whole article is that, in all mammals, females have a much larger reproductive success than males, a difference even BIGGER when the females are given a choice in their mates, suggesting se…
/r/BlackPillScience25/01/19 10:24 AM
14

This is because a big part of online dating is sugar daddy/sugar baby related.
/r/BlackPillScience16/12/18 01:12 AM
33

compared to a massive 70 per cent of female respondents admitted that they would ignore or avoid the opposite sex because of the way they looked. 30 % of female respondents are liars
/r/BlackPillScience15/12/18 04:09 AM
23

Those animals without a competitive instinct often make better use of resources than do the competitive ones, the scientists reported in Nature Communications. But, the drive for competitive behavior often is triggered by the females of the species preferring the alpha male approach, even to the point of ignoring males that would make better mates. Therein, the scientists found, lies danger. GIGA BLACKPILLED. Bruh these evoltionary approaches have been killing me recently, so much blackpilled st…
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 10:37 AM
16

Can you screenshot for Europecels because it seems Europe copyright laws have plunged us into a dystopian reality where we can't access 90% of foreign news sites.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 09:59 AM
3

To think pupil diameter change is the end all be all of female sexual arousal is the stupidest thing you made me read today. There are so many other factors that could lead to pupillary diameter change, and the few articles I saw that linked it to human relationships were about how pupils respond to emotional scenes. Their pupils dilate for friends and their vaginas get wet for sexual interest. This is the least convincing argument against the blackpill JFL at you "umm sweaty, pupils don't alway…
/r/BlackPillScience08/12/18 12:01 AM
8

Bullfucking shit, there are many studies that tried to compare what females say attracts them, and what actually does. A direct comparison, and the results are giga blackpilled, with physical attractiveness always coming first. You're talking straight out of your dirty ass.
/r/BlackPillScience07/12/18 10:54 PM
31

Immediate flaw in the method, they asked the females who they thought was sexier and who they would like to know better instead of objectively assessing attraction. Page 15: The scale consists of eight items, four that assess romantic or sexual attraction (e.g., How sexy is this person?’ and ‘How much would you like to date this person?’) and four items that assess general attraction (e.g., ‘Is this the type of person you would like to get to know better?’). The questions were answered on a 9-po…
/r/BlackPillScience07/12/18 07:01 AM
13

It sure won't be if everybody keeps on saying it's just the natural state for humans. Hope for social change might be a cope, but it's a cope I'm willing to stand by.
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 07:32 PM
17

Dude you didn't even read the abstract lmao, this was done on avian species through genetic testing.
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 07:29 PM
18

That's true, but no matter how rare or hard to enforce looksmatched monogamy is, it IS possible. Black vultures for example have an entire social system built around enforcing monogamy : When one member tries to flirt/mate with anyone other than their mate, the entire flock attacks him. There hasn't been a single documented case of extra-pair descendants in black vultures so far. If a bunch of birds can do it, we can. I feel it's quite defeatist to say "oh well most animals are polygynous, and m…
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 07:17 PM
25

There is no such thing as "natural" state. You could with that same logic argue that rape is the "natural" state for humans because a shitload of animals reproduce mostly through rape and males are physically stronger than females. Even animal societies build rules around mating.
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 07:01 PM
29

Amazing. Clear cut proof of female hypergamy and the reason for the existence of incels. Chads are hoarding everything. Can you post the link in the comments?
/r/BlackPillScience10/11/18 04:23 PM
20

Blue pilled garbage. things like core personality, annoying habits, sense of humor, political standing, religious beliefs/lack thereof, level of intelligence, how one treats their perceived "inferiors", their love language, sexual abilities Every single one of those things, except religious beliefs, is affected by the halo effect. Hot guys are perceived as having a better personality, all their behaviors are described positively, more funny, more likely to have orgasm with only vanilla penis in …
/r/BlackPillScience26/10/18 10:29 PM
1

that's because it's quaranteened, you need to access it through web the first time, then it'll appear in ur phone as usual
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/18 09:16 AM
9

this belongs in braincels, not blackpillscience
/r/BlackPillScience18/10/18 04:07 PM
43

MaYbE TheY JusT hAd A gOOD pERsonAlItY
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/18 09:58 AM
2

Im a classical marxist with a distaste for rightwing sources but godamn. This was amazing and on the dot about everything. The blackpill in an article.
/r/BlackPillScience21/09/18 07:53 PM
22

I dont see a contradiction at all. Women only view a small number of men as attractive, so they are less subject to the halo effect on average than men who have much more lax standards. If you isolate the top 20% tho, i think halo effect is actually more pronounced with women.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/18 11:31 AM
29

WAW dude. Absolutely B R U T A L article. How can any sane person see this and not claim women in the modern era have a crushing advantage in dating. This is getting out of hand, there will be a conservative backlash to all this.
/r/BlackPillScience27/07/18 11:58 PM
1

This is a specific study on jobless mozambican men living outside of the system. This has little to do with the blackpill imo
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/18 11:05 PM
8

Great summary. I would add that women's newfound financial independence, a lesser cultural pressure for women to partner up as well as the availability of efficient birth control and a robust social net for single mothers is making many women less interested in settling for a long term relationship too. LTR are either chad or nothing. They'd rather raise chad's kids alone.
/r/BlackPillScience23/06/18 01:39 PM
11

This is not related at all. You're just trying to spur a narrative of "wymin have it just as bad". You were trying the same bullshit in a post here some days ago.
/r/BlackPillScience22/06/18 12:28 PM
5

Given the lack of evidence for the contrast effect for women in this study, the hypothesize that there would be an even more extreme example of the contrast effect elsewhere seems unjustifiably motivated. This is not true at all. This study only looked for the contrast effect on most recent targets during a speed dating session, where people only had 4 mins of contact with each date. That says absolutely nothing about possible contrast effects when not confined to recent targets. Very unlikely. …
/r/BlackPillScience19/06/18 09:39 AM
2

I think this line is important : "We further show that the contrastive influence of past target attractiveness is confined to the most recent target and argue that the differential influence of recent as compared to more distant past targets is evidence for a bias in perception but not consistent with alternative explanations such as learning or the presence of quotas. " I wonder if there is a study where this contrast effect is studied in women specifically to test this idea of quotas. As in: d…
/r/BlackPillScience19/06/18 08:24 AM
28

Holyshit this is mindblowing. I'd argue this very same effect is also at play with facial aesthetics, only facial aesthetics are a little harder to objectively measure unlike height, which is why there's much more data on height. This would explain why ethniccels have a harder time, their culture was based on traditionalist values and arranged marriages much longer than europe. Everything fits.
/r/BlackPillScience17/06/18 05:24 AM
36

You have to see wether this is genetic or acquired through positive reinforcement. Attractive people will have their parents treat them better from the start (google it, is true), their classmates treat them well. Less chance of bullying, less chance of dropping out etc... It's also just a correlation, there are still many High IQ cels and lowIQ chads
/r/BlackPillScience14/06/18 04:22 PM
18

High IQ and blackpilled. I would love to know if these findings change at non-zero acquaintance. And how being unattractive could possibly be a hindrance to acquaintance, as in unattractive people are more likely to have fewer friends of the opposite gender.
/r/BlackPillScience28/05/18 08:48 AM
4

Waw. Great post man. The fact that both exposure and culture didn't account for the difference in face preferences in the second study really suggests an ingrained biological standard of beauty.
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/18 07:55 AM
3

It's better to post the original source paper instead of just a random chart. The source isn't even cited in the chart
/r/BlackPillScience22/05/18 01:43 PM
3

In my view, the interaction between face and body in men could easily cancel these results. Perhaps in ugly faces, physical strength would have no effect at all since the face immediately eliminates any possible attractiveness. Perhaps in short "baby face" men, physical strength would actually lower attractiveness because they look so weird with muscles. If you wanna go for the short and cute style, you gotta commit all the way. Perhaps in tall strong jaw chads, the effect is very minimal becaus…
/r/BlackPillScience17/05/18 08:02 AM
9

Great stuff. Man I love this sub.
/r/BlackPillScience17/05/18 07:45 AM
22

Bullying may thus represent an effective behavior for increasing the number of sexual partners. Roasties are to blame for our bullying, they are the ones rewarding them with sex and incentivizing them to bully.
/r/BlackPillScience05/05/18 07:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter