bdtails Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Why should men feel sympathy for women’s right to an abortion? No electricity sounds infinitely better than whatever we have now? You could just join an amish community if you truly think so…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/26 04:52 PM
1	Male puberty needs to be celebrated Tuli is definitely not a good practice to spread whatsoever. We should not be cutting off healthy functional body parts from kids going through puberty to celebrate them…	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/06/26 05:00 PM
0	Is there anything at all that you feel like men need grace for? I did not draw any conclusions, i quoted the studies findings directly. The “specific context” is parent’s reaction of images of childrens emotional expression, not of their own children. The study also duplicated the results with different samples in order to be sure of the initial findings. I also said it’s not on women solely, and was addressing “women ‘’massively contribute’’ to this >specifically<“. Maybe i should have elaborated more or possibly been more concise in what i am trying to say…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/04/26 09:04 PM
-2	Is there anything at all that you feel like men need grace for? I do not think it is solely on women, its the fact that women “massively contribute” to this specifically and men do not, and trying to ‘both sides’ this problem further delays “change” and is where “you are wrong”	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/04/26 07:31 PM
-2	Is there anything at all that you feel like men need grace for? “Results indicated that mothers show more favorable attitudes toward sadness and anger expression by girls versus boys. Fathers showed no preference in either IAT, suggesting a lack of bias about the expression of sadness and anger. Mothers’ performance on IATang was negatively associated with supportive sadness socialization and positively associated with unsupportive sadness and anger socialization. Findings suggest that mothers, but not fathers, may possess gender-related implicit biases abou…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/04/26 07:07 PM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision I asked: “what is your definition of a comparison?” i did not ask: “does circumcision require comparisons?” The reply: “It doesn’t require a comparison” Is an answer to the latter question and a deflection to the former question. I asked the former question, you replied with a deflection, not an answer. So, once again… sorry, you don’t get to ignore my question and get to ask me to answer yours… what is your definition of a comparison?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 03:13 PM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision That is not an answer, that is a deflection to ignore the question. Sorry, you don’t get to ignore my question and get to ask me to answer yours… what is your definition of comparison?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 02:08 PM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision Sorry, you don’t get to ignore my question and get to ask me to answer yours… What is your definition of comparison?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 01:43 PM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision Sure, it suffices as an argument. Why not use more than one argument? Why does the discourse surrounding the topic have to end after one argument? Also, what is your definition for comparison?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 03:36 AM
2	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision Sufficient for what exactly? Every time you say this, you never explain what exactly is your statement sufficient for? I wonder why?	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/26 06:39 PM
2	Straight women’s homophobia toward men gets excused way too easily Sympathizing with someone literally means you’re agreeing with them. You not agreeing with whats being said means you’re not sympathizing , meaning you’re not “hearing this”	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/26 11:31 PM
8	Men created the “high maintenance woman” they complain about For starters, you made the false assumption of how someone would react to being critical of whatever their hobby is. Someone very well might say, “you’re right, im wasting my time and money on this hobby, i wont anymore, thanks for showing me a new perspective” There is also the aspect that a hobby is not something done to a person or for another person, it is a personal interest that reaps personal benefits every time someone partakes in. Simping is the exact opposite of this, specifically doin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/03/26 01:36 PM
10	Men created the “high maintenance woman” they complain about Im not calling anyone simps, im just pointing out how horrible your analogy is. I could explain multiple reasons why if you would like?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/03/26 12:44 PM
20	Men created the “high maintenance woman” they complain about Im all for shitty analogies and comparing apples to oranges, but this one is truly horrible.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/03/26 11:40 AM
2	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women It’s not a moot point because you intentionally misconstrued the point. They said earlobes amputated to avoid cleaning, and you went to girls getting their ears pierced, which has nothing to do with avoiding cleaning. Why are you arguing in such bad faith?	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/12/25 02:46 PM
0	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women Again, this is blatant misinformation. How many times do people have to tell you: ALL BODY PARTS ARE MORE PRONE TO ISSUES IF THEY ARE NOT MAINTAINED PROPERLY. ALL OF THEM. Singling out any body parts, and saying that having it will cause more issues compared to not having it is asinine and is misinformation. The body part being singled out like this being MALE is misandry. Whether intentional or not, you are spreading misinformation and justifying cutting off healthy functional body parts from a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 05:49 PM
3	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women Yes, you’re anecdotal experience that cannot be verified as true does not trump sourced scientific studies. 🙄	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 05:20 PM
0	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women The vagina is self cleaning, the vulva is not. Literally every part of your body will become infected if not cleaned or maintained properly. This is objective fact. To claim otherwise is a blatant lie and is spreading misinformation, which needs to be called out. Honestly its alarming that a grown woman is trying to justify cutting healthy boys with this much misinformation.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 04:07 PM
1	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women The exact same thing can be said about female genital cutting. The number one supporters of female genital cutting are overwhelmingly circumcised women. Yet for some reason, everyone regardless of their gender, should stick up for these victims, but when it comes to baby boys, now its only men have to be blamed for not protecting these victims, and women should not care at all until all men care?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 03:33 PM
2	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women “Those kids are experiencing foreskin infections at similar rates I’m sure” Just straight up conjecture without any reliable evidence or sources. Please stop spreading lies and misinformation to justify cutting healthy functional body parts from babies.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 03:02 PM
5	The bigger obstacles to male rights are simps and conservatives, not women This is blatant misandry disguised as caring for boys. “Most parents aren’t going to hold down their child every night retracting his foreskin and clean it” At no point is any parent HOLDING DOWN their child just to clean their foreskin. You are already showing how ridiculous your claims are by making it seem like boys are fighting back when in the shower being cleaned by their parents, but ONLY for one body part? Literally some of my first memories was being showered by my parents and grandmoth…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/25 02:03 PM
1	Dating for months does not automatically mean a relationship. In my personal experience and that of people in my social circle, it has genuinely only been women not “declare its a relationship” and then claim the man is “cheating when he dates/ fuck other girls”. My friend was telling me about how the guy she was dating for a couple months took her out to dinner to make the relationship official. He made the effort to claim exclusivity, and she literally told him “no, im not ready for us to be exclusive” Following weekend they go to an event with their gro…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/12/25 05:45 AM
0	Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth. Is 12 a common age for high schoolers where you live?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/25 03:20 PM
-1	Way too many people want hook ups and won’t admit it. I think it’s because they want to lie to others and themselves. You don’t know what false pretenses are.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/11/25 09:41 PM
3	Before or After “…they literally aren’t a real friend” Im pretty sure this is a “no true scotsman” fallacy, which, to me at least, is a little ironic when compared to your other comments on this thread that are so adamant in labeling things a certain way.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/09/25 11:52 PM
3	Plenty of men are shallow unattractive assholes who never wanted to be good men. Oh man when this guy founds out what his nipples are attached too…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/09/25 06:15 AM
1	Q4M: Is it common for men to fantasize about being with a billionaire? Reed Richards is jealous of your ability to stretch and reach so far.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/09/25 06:17 PM
1	Q4M: Is it common for men to fantasize about being with a billionaire? For starters, i never made that claim, that’s OP saying that. If you think there are flaws with the evidence OP presents for their claims, you take it up with OP. Not double down on the flawed premise and then when called out on it, claim whataboutism from a completely different person when you already had a problem with it in the first place. You know you’re grasping at straws with this argument, whether you want to admit it or not. Fortunately, you exposed what was wrong with your own argument…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/09/25 03:44 PM
1	Q4M: Is it common for men to fantasize about being with a billionaire? Are they dating these celebrities, deep fakes, lookalike porn stars? This is an example of a non sequitur argument	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/09/25 01:19 PM
–	Sabrina Carpenter’s new song “Manchild” is misandrist and hateful Like many people have exhaustively pointed out, there are orders of magnitude more misogynistic songs, so there is no double standard to call out. Why don’t you call out the misogyny in all the music that other people have brought up? You’re extremely disingenuous and how you hate women is weird.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/06/25 11:21 PM
2	Sabrina Carpenter’s new song “Manchild” is misandrist and hateful It’s weird how OP hates women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/06/25 02:26 PM
–	Women’s bodies are respected and protected more than men’s It’s very misleading to use men that have medical circumcision to treat phimosis as proof that sensation is not lost. They had a medical problem that made their erect penis uncomfortable and painful.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/05/25 11:23 AM
2	The Australian woman who got a very light sentence (7.5 years, but can get out after 4.5) for immolating a male friend for making a mildly misogynistic joke is an example of female privilege. 9 days isn’t enough?! What, you need double digit amount days to make a single post about dog? which apparently you like more then people, who you’ve made posts about on day 1, and then continued to make another 7 posts about over the course of a week… Ya, you definitely like dogs more than people…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/25 07:04 PM
9	The Australian woman who got a very light sentence (7.5 years, but can get out after 4.5) for immolating a male friend for making a mildly misogynistic joke is an example of female privilege. Yet your nine day old account doesn’t have a single post to do with advocating for dogs, only posts about people… That doesn’t sound like someone who “likes dogs more than people”	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/25 06:49 PM
16	The Australian woman who got a very light sentence (7.5 years, but can get out after 4.5) for immolating a male friend for making a mildly misogynistic joke is an example of female privilege. What was the sentence right before the one about the “cute puppy”… “A man kidnapped his ex and raped her” The sentence after the one about the “cute puppy” “While he was out on bail he killed his ex” But all your sympathies are for the “cute puppy”…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/25 05:59 PM
31	The Australian woman who got a very light sentence (7.5 years, but can get out after 4.5) for immolating a male friend for making a mildly misogynistic joke is an example of female privilege. Day old account, “blue pill man” flair, equates a man breaking 43 bones and brain bleed of a NEWBORN child to aborting an “unborn” child… Some comments from this “blue pill man” “[womens] desire to be tossed around like warm fuck meat in the bedroom is why they will always be the MEME SEX” 😂 “Their are zero women alive that are my equal” When asked for sources for his “facts”: “Its ubiquitous” The guy that refers to women as the “MEME SEX” is calling others “Peak redditor”… the irony is palpable…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/25 05:53 PM
2	Female bodies are respected more than male bodies What would this “sufficient argument” be for exactly?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 05:01 PM
0	Being alone and sexless doesn’t even compare to having to have sex with somebody you don’t want to have sex with Im wondering what is your point, or why are you replying to me about this?	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/25 02:42 PM
1	Being alone and sexless doesn’t even compare to having to have sex with somebody you don’t want to have sex with Far more likely than winning the grand prize of the lottery, but no significant difference than winning anything from the prize pool of the lottery…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/25 02:01 PM
1	What is meant by “accountability”? Im not trying to argue with you, just explaining what pride is. It’s fine to have high importance of yourself, never said you should not, but do you only have high importance of yourself solely because you’re a woman? I would wager even if you were a man, you would still have high importance of yourself. So clarifying your high importance of yourself because “it affects me” is just arrogance. It also doesn’t change the fact that you cannot, by definition, be “proud to be a woman”, because “to be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/25 10:09 PM
2	What is meant by “accountability”? If you take a look at the definitions of “proud”: Feeling deep pleasure or satisfaction as a result of one’s own achievements, qualities or possessions, or those of someone with whom one is closely associated. ( a proud grandma of three boys) Having or showing a high or excessively high opinion of oneself or one’s importance. ( a proud,arrogant man) You did not achieve anything “to be a woman”. It is not a quality “to be a woman”. “To be a woman” is not something to possess. You’re not deriving …	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/25 07:41 PM
7	circumcision on unwilling babies should be considered child abuse You think babies are religious…	/r/MensRights	03/03/25 07:35 AM
5	when people say they circumcised their children to improve their sex lives what their really saying is. You’re complaining about “random strangers opinion taken over their own damn parents” while replying to a guy suggesting to take the opinion of SEX WORKERS for NEWBORN BABIES!!! There is not a better example of cognitive dissonance I’ve seen in a long time.	/r/MensRights	27/02/25 12:58 PM
2	Q4M: Why are you not hypergamous? Both “males and women” hypergamous AND hypogamous, it is a spectrum with multiple scales that determines where any individual will be placed, and the placement on the spectrum changes based on different perspectives. That is why i said this relates to your “would you date a loser woman?” post. Based on your perspective and the women that agreed with you in the comments of that post, men dating the woman you described as a loser would be hypogamous, but the overwhelming majority of the men saw it…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/02/25 07:54 PM
2	Q4M: Why are you not hypergamous? It is hypergamy, sociological* status is influenced by sexual orientation(your sociological status is changed when you identify as heterosexual, homosexual,bisexual etc.) sexual experiences (virgins, incels, abstinence “waiting for marriage”, sluts, “fuccbois”) sexual health (STDs, use of safe sex practices, addictions to porn and sex). ALL of these things influence sociological status and how people perceive each other and are deciding factors for ALL relationships. The fact that the terms “sex…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/02/25 06:18 PM
0	High maintenance women get bitter at low maintenance women who are happy. “Misery enjoys company”	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/01/25 02:23 PM
1	As a woman, I really don't get the logic behind "I got used for sex" Why isn’t sexual desire not considered an emotion that can be manipulated?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/25 05:23 PM
–	Many women and men on this sub are willfully ignorant about male genital mutilation What is so sufficient about your circumcision statement that there doesn’t need to be any further discussion?	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/24 04:44 AM
–	Many women and men on this sub are willfully ignorant about male genital mutilation It doesn’t even have to be her daughters breasts, she could remove her sons breast tissue to prevent breast cancer for him, which is 3x as likely to happen to a man compared to penile cancer.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/24 03:04 AM
14	How to stop male infant circumcision or advocate against male infant circumcision? “We conclude that non-therapeutic circumcision performed on otherwise healthy infants or children has little or no high-quality medical evidence to support its overall benefit. Moreover, it is associated with rare but avoidable harm and even occasional deaths. From the perspective of the individual boy, there is no medical justification for performing a circumcision prior to an age that he can assess the known risks and potential benefits, and choose to give or withhold informed consent himself.…	/r/MensRights	01/10/24 08:20 AM
5	Do you believe circumcision is harming males? Mutilation is not defined by the motivations of an act, nor is it defined by its health benefits/risks. :an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal Circumcision removes body parts, therefore circumcision is mutilation.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/24 10:31 PM
1	How to convince my husband not to circumcise our baby boy? Learn what the word “personal” means…	/r/MensRights	28/07/24 05:44 PM
8	good podcast debate on circumcision The pediatricion is a jewish man by the name of dr. Ted Handler who is against circumcision. Anyone wanna take a wild guess who the pro circumcision biologist is? Brian J. Morris 😂 of course it’s him	/r/MensRights	11/04/24 10:36 PM
4	Male circumcision is bad for everyone: in-depth article Do you always come up with your own definitions and caveats for words that already have there own definition?	/r/MensRights	16/12/23 07:00 AM
2	The Hypocrisy of Circumcision They never even said you were from the states, and even if they did, why do you feel insulted by that😂 my guy imagines himself getting dogpiled for his “nuanced opinion”	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/12/23 02:18 PM
8	Can we stop calling it "circumcision" and instead call it male genital mutilation? Imagine justifying circumcising a baby because… the babies penis is not attractive to you… pedo	/r/MensRights	03/12/23 10:57 PM
1	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? Im sorry but cutting off healthy parts of a babies genitals is never in the kid’s interests. No parent has the right to cut off parts of their child’s genitals off. There was no “informing parents of the downsides” when it came to FGM. The best response was to make it illegal. The same should be for circumcision.	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 11:31 PM
3	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? And all those benefits have been debunked multiple times…	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 06:49 PM
1	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? Yes they are allowed an opinion, I just asked “whats with the body shaming?” They can like their own penis/circumcision without putting others down. Why did you assume im offended?	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 06:43 PM
1	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? body shaming noun the action or practice of mocking or stigmatizing someone by making critical comments about the shape, size, or appearance of their body. adjective expressing mockery or criticism about the shape, size, or appearance of a person's body. “My dick is way more attractive than those rolled down sock looking things” It doesnt change the meaning of “shame” because it has its own separate meaning.	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 06:39 PM
3	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? Ya, just completely ignore the first half of the phrase… What a shame you don’t understand basic sentences	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 04:02 PM
3	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? Do you mind linking that tweet.	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 02:18 PM
5	Is circumcising infants a violation of rights? Why the blatant body shaming?	/r/MensRights	20/07/23 02:14 PM
7	Prevalence of Male Circumcision across the world. Doesn't this piss anyone off? How can something like this be so common, yet it is this not illegal or even a social issue within any country? By definition it is mutilation. Circumcision lowering stds and penile cancer has been debunked numerous times.	/r/MensRights	15/07/23 04:04 PM
2	Does circumcision really help decrease the possibly of getting AIDS? The things people lie about to justify cutting baby dicks.	/r/MensRights	14/07/23 10:22 PM
5	My baby brother was circumcised. What about the men that do report loss of sensation and function? What about that fact that adult men that are happy with their adult circumcision are almost exclusively men that had problems with their foreskin, therefore not an accurate representation of what circumcision does to sensation and function. By definition, it is mutilation…	/r/MensRights	16/05/23 04:17 PM
4	Anti-Circumcision Selfies Its not better to be done early on though. Thats the point im trying to make to you. Your more likely to die if your circumcised as a baby then as an adult, all factors included. There are recent studies that show you will have more complication the earlier in childhood it is done. It is impossible for a child to decide if they want to be circumcised, so POSTPONE the decision until they are able to make the decision themselves. You said it yourself, it unnecessary, so let the person whose body i…	/r/MensRights	11/02/23 11:09 PM
7	Anti-Circumcision Selfies It doesnt HAVE to be done early on, it doesnt have to be done AT ALL. you are more likely to die of circumcision as a baby then an adult. Idk where you got the idea its the opposite Foreskin is not excess skin, and its not just skin either. Its the normal amount. Let people decide for themselves what parts of their genitals they want cut off. Its their body, not the parents.	/r/MensRights	11/02/23 10:56 PM
2	Circumcision is unfair. I would complain if people were removing appendixes from newborn infants…	/r/MensRights	07/01/23 03:51 PM
9	Woman protesting infant circumcision in Ocean City, Maryland It reduces the risk of ONLY one form of penile cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, which is skin cancer, so you can still get it. When accounting for phimosis, the protective effect for the one type of penile cancer is negated. Not to mention that penile cancer of any kind is sooo rare, that men are 3X more likely to get breast cancer then they are to get skin cancer… Cervical cancer is caused by HPV, which there is a vaccine that all but eliminates the risk of cervical cancer. https://link.springe…	/r/MensRights	18/12/22 03:32 PM
2	I saw some news about an AI speech generator so I asked it some questions. It has a double standard about circumcision :( When im saying someone else, i mean someone else then yourself or someone else than the parents themselves for that matter. Thats it. That can include relatives, your children, even your identical twin brother with exactly same dna as you. Its funny how you can make note that cutting off the foreskin of someone random would be wrong but cutting off the foreskin of your own infant children is your religious right somehow. Whose to say i dont have my foreskin cut off?	/r/MensRights	09/12/22 10:30 PM
2	I saw some news about an AI speech generator so I asked it some questions. It has a double standard about circumcision :( “Its not someone else, it’s their child…” oh, so someone else then. The irony 😂 It shouldn’t be your decision to make, it should be the decision of the person who is having parts of their body cut off.	/r/MensRights	09/12/22 07:32 PM
3	I saw some news about an AI speech generator so I asked it some questions. It has a double standard about circumcision :( Its fine and dandy that these people have their own beliefs, opinions and world-views. Infant circumcision as a religious or cultural practice, let alone in general, is still the minority. When you said majority and meant different people that subscribe to different worldview, you were wrong in describing it as the majority when in fact it is the minority. The problem is carving out your religious beliefs on someone else that doesn’t explicitly ask for it. Your the one not minding ur damn busine…	/r/MensRights	09/12/22 06:55 PM
3	I saw some news about an AI speech generator so I asked it some questions. It has a double standard about circumcision :( Except cutting of the foreskin of infants for religion IS the minority opinion. There are more intact men then circumcised. Your the one forcing the “minority opinion”. You can teach your child religious beliefs, but you cant carve your religious practices on anyones body, let alone a baby.	/r/MensRights	09/12/22 06:08 PM
3	Circumcusion should only be performed on men of legal age. Change My Mind Abnormality and defect might not be synonymous, but you are referencing that aposthia is not a defect as if their is nothing wrong, when it is in fact referred to as otherwise. Searching up the definition of consensus, it says “a general agreement”. The irony in this is if i can “cherry pick” a handful of studies that dont agree that infant circumcision is beneficial, then that is evidence that there is no scientific consensus… You state the function is the same with or without foreskin, but a b…	/r/MensRights	14/10/22 10:54 PM
4	Circumcusion should only be performed on men of legal age. Change My Mind When you search up aposthia on google, it says “aposthia is a very rare congenital abnormality…” Search up congenital on google, first definition says “of a disease or physical abnormality) present from birth”. Funniest thing about this, is you started off saying, “there is actually no scientific consensus…”, Kind of like how theres no scientific consensus that infant circumcision is beneficial. Its not your body, its not your choice. some sources for your claims would be really helpful to your …	/r/MensRights	14/10/22 01:31 PM
5	Circumcusion should only be performed on men of legal age. Change My Mind How so?	/r/MensRights	14/10/22 04:21 AM
6	Circumcusion should only be performed on men of legal age. Change My Mind Not vestigial…	/r/MensRights	14/10/22 04:14 AM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie Your analogy with the airplanes is not an equal comparison “Airplanes rarely crash” = “foreskins rarely have problems” “Foreskins rarely have problems, but i wont keep my foreskin” = “Airplanes rarely have problems, but i wont go on airplanes” “Foreskins rarely have problems, but ill keep it and do the simplest things to keep it healthy” = “airplanes rarely crash, but ill still go on airplanes and take two seconds to put my seatbelt on when the seatbelt light comes on”	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 09:05 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie You say you dont want your son to have balanitis or a restricted foreskin as if Its a foregone conclusion that they will have these problems because they have a foreskin These problems cannot be remedied any other way IF they ever do come up. “If i dont want my daughter to have clitoral phimosis i should be allowed to consent for my new born girl to have female circumcision” “If i dont want my daughter to have problems with restricting/uncomfortable labia, i should be allowed to consent to have …	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 08:49 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie But all infant foreskins are problem free…	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 08:08 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie Thats a huuuge “if”. So few truly need a circumcision, and many times there are better solutions to the problem.	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 08:05 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie Nearly all foreskins are problem free	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 07:55 PM
6	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie How are “us guys” making it the governments decision? Literally saying it should be left up to the person having the circumcision done to them. What about female circumcision, is that currently a “government decision” because it is a crime for doctors, or anyone for that matter, to do that to little girls under parental consent?	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 07:53 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie Im glad you pointed out its subjective. Leave the options and decision up to the person that is going to have to deal with it. You keep mentioning the guy in this thread that had an adult circumcision as if he didn’t explicitly say he thinks doing it to babies is abuse… For starters, its objectively not easier or safer to be done as an infant. Objectively, the easiest and safest thing to do is to not circumcise…	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 07:48 PM
8	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie “Individual/family decision” The irony	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 06:17 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie For every anecdote of a guy having a problem with their foreskin, there is another anecdote of a guy having a problem with their infant circumcision. For every guy that could have avoided foreskin issues with infant circumcision, there are guys that could have avoided circumcision issues if their parents didnt circumcise them. It works both ways	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 06:10 PM
3	does any one have any sources that show the the benefits of circumcision is a lie To say their are “plenty of reasons” to circumcise a child “rather” then wait for the person to make the decision themselves is ignorant. There are plenty more reasons to leave the child alone.	/r/MensRights	16/09/22 06:04 PM
2	Isn't Circumcision Already Illegal? And when they are not apathetic and engage with the conversation?	/r/MensRights	10/09/22 02:40 PM
4	Isn't Circumcision Already Illegal? Can i ask what you mean by “simply ask any woman you work with/go to school with”? Whats the implied answer?	/r/MensRights	10/09/22 07:23 AM
3	circumcision needs to stop! The information you provided is medically inaccurate though, or at the very least, misrepresenting the reality of having foreskin in a disingenuous way in favour of circumcision due to the extreme bias. “Medical literature” cant be biased, its the “researchers” that are biased and it shows in the literature they publish. Of course there is no way to completely remove bias, but to not account for it is unscientific. If an antivaxxer asked me for that, i wouldnt dismiss, them, id at least try to p…	/r/MensRights	07/09/22 05:08 PM
5	circumcision needs to stop! You keep posting the same picture that comes from a pro-circumcision website (no bias at all), with half the references coming from self described “circumsexual” Brian Morris (definitely no bias at all), and the other half of the references, coming from american medical institutions, (absolutely no chance for bias at all), that, wait for it, reference Brian Morris as there sources. (THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BIAS, WHATSOEVER). All coming from an account user called “circumscientist”… Has anyone …	/r/MensRights	05/09/22 04:57 PM
1	Circumcision I would rather provide money/support/development of basic sanitations such as plumbing/clean running water, then to provide that same money to cut off parts of their genitals… it would objectively be of much greater benefit of the former rather than the latter.	/r/MensRights	23/07/22 12:11 PM
11	The state of circumcisions in Norway If either choice is neither good or bad, then it is up to the person that owns the body part if they want the procedure or not. And if you say that it is better to be done as an infant, especially that its worse when done older, then you are conceding it to being “bad”.	/r/MensRights	26/06/22 06:17 AM
6	circumcising infants. What are they imposing?	/r/MensRights	12/06/22 11:36 PM