TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beansmuch Archive

View 1 post and 91 comments by beansmuch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Question for you: you inferred that submissiveness and kindness are the same thing. Do you believe this, and if so, why?
/r/ExRedPill02/05/23 11:11 PM
1

Therefore the redpill comes and says that having basic respect for yourself will help you with women When did I say that this wouldn't help? I said it's a necessary condition but not a sufficient one.
/r/ExRedPill26/04/23 12:32 PM
2

Cheers
/r/ExRedPill25/04/23 04:17 PM
5

No really, I want you to tell me what a guy with no self-respect and boundries that's successful with women looks like. I've never seen one like that. Sure, I don't disagree, but that's not my point. My point is that you said that having self-respect and boundaries will get someone dates. What I am saying is that those are necessary conditions, but not sufficient conditions. In other words, it's like: having open land doesn't mean you'll have a successful vegetable garden. You need to water the …
/r/ExRedPill25/04/23 03:19 PM
1

I have not read it. Interested to know what made you think about it from my comment though!
/r/ExRedPill25/04/23 03:09 PM
5

The irony is that all men had to do to get a girlfriend was to have some self-respect and boundries in the first place. Nope. One of the reasons why people go to red pill in the first place is precisely because they're disenchanted with advice like this. No, most men won't get a girlfriend just because they have self-respect and boundaries.... that advice is just as vacuous as any red pill advice is. Having self-respct and boundaries are tools to sustaining relationships, not for starting them i…
/r/ExRedPill25/04/23 01:30 PM
5

I just told him I wasn't interested in dating anyone anymore. Well, this is why red pill is shitty for its followers... you ain't the first person around here to have left a prospective man for his red pill beliefs. Here's a post someone made from the other side of the coin (being a red piller and being ghosted by a girl from it). At the end of the day, followers of the red pill cannot form meaningful relationships with women because its behavorial tactics are antithetical to forming meaningful …
/r/ExRedPill24/04/23 09:56 PM
1

Question is how much harm does it cause to everyone in general ? It causes the most harm to its followers or people who are influenced by its behavorial tips. It causes the second most harm to its followers' female friends / partners / etc. To everyone else, it's pretty irrelevant. What it is is a relationship destroyer / impeder, so however bad you think destroying relationships is out of 10. What is the baseline for danger? For example, if "this could incite riots and looting" is 5/10 danger, …
/r/ExRedPill24/04/23 09:51 PM
9

Just wait until you're 25... it gets worse.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:01 AM
2

I mean, it depends on one's goal. Many red pill guys are just looking for one night stands. If you're a women and you want a one night stand, it is not hard to achieve. If you're a man, it's much harder to achieve. But it is more risky and dangerous if you're a women In terms of finding a compatible partner for a long term relationship, everybody has it hard.
/r/ExRedPill19/04/23 09:33 PM
2

Preference uncertainty. This doesn't just relate to dating, but everything about life. A really good example of this is abortion and down syndrome. When asked if they would have a termination if their fetus tested positive, 23–33% said yes, when high-risk pregnant women were asked, 46–86% said yes, and when women who screened positive are asked, 89–97% say yes A good analogy for this is descriptive ethics vs. prescriptive ethics. Prescriptive ethics is about people telling you how they act in th…
/r/ExRedPill18/04/23 04:02 AM
2

That's expected, I think. I've seen lots of them as well. But people who want to be ex-redpill already see something wrong about it, but they also see a lot right about it still, and they actually want to be disabused. Regarding the people who are full redpill, I would argue it's on us to plant a seed of doubt to why redpill thought is bad for them. At the very least, it's better that they're not only posting on redpill subreddits in an echo chamber; at least they're exposed to some criticism. H…
/r/ExRedPill26/03/23 07:00 PM
10

I'm glad you're moving on from the red pill as well. That being said, I do have to push back on the following That rp behavior is what little kids do and i’m not speaking on age It's what hurt-to-indoctrinated people do. You went down that spiral, I went down that spiral, we have to have empathy for these folks. I was hurt when I found RP, you were hurt when you found RP... I lost a friendship because of the way redpill made me think about women, you lost a potentially awesome girlfriend because…
/r/ExRedPill26/03/23 03:00 PM
23

People saying it's not redpills fault, what? "I have this mentality in my head that women are just out to get me. " This is literally how redpill skews men's minds. I mentioned it in a post yesterday, got thumbed down, but look at that, OP is a literal example of this. It's almost as if this subreddit is dominated by people who've never been influenced by the red pill.... Anyway to OP... a lot of us have been there. The redpill influences your perspective on women in ways that are damaging to YO…
/r/ExRedPill26/03/23 02:40 PM
17

A single instance. This one thing that we do that causes a lot of people to develop red pill thought. We read one-off stories, we extrapolate the worst 5% of a demographic onto that entire demographic, etc. Okay, fine. It's not just redpill that does this... feminism is pretty good at using one-off stories as evidence of how men are and pretty good at judging all men as if they were all simultaneously apart of the 1% wealthiest and the 1% most wicked... we all do it... but we have to be wary to …
/r/ExRedPill25/03/23 09:44 PM
1

Going to have to disagree with the relevance, validity or importance with the first 6 of these points. The first five points are either political or LGBT related. Do not conflate the red pill with politics, because a lot of red pill people are left wing or center... and red pill doesn't actually comment on LGBT... sure you can find some anti-LGBT red pillers, but the philosophy itself is really just a form of behavioural psychology and applied anthropology. At the core, it says, "this is how wom…
/r/ExRedPill25/03/23 09:33 PM
5

I'm going to go on a long rant here... it's not directed at you specifically so don't take it like that, it's just that your post sparked some latent feelings that I've had brewing in me for years. Being built like Zeus is fuelled by body image disorders. Not saying I've ever been built like Zeus (never taken T, EPO, growth hormone, etc... all people built like Zeus take PEDs) but I've spent way too much time training for aesthetics as opposed to things related to health span and work capacity. …
/r/ExRedPill25/03/23 07:30 PM
1

Are these the effects of the redpill ideology? Beating up the woman who raised you? No. Does gangsta rap turn suburban kids from healthy households into cold blooded killers? Anyone who beats up their mother has a whole nother thing going on with them, just like someone who kills someone else for being slighted has a whole nother thing going on with them. Furthermore, to get to the point of "women are all whores", etc., you need to be seriously stuck inside an echo chamber, in their case, their …
/r/ExRedPill24/03/23 02:50 AM
5

Psychologists are starting to compare the "emasculation" of men in society to conversion therapy. Source? Not that I disagree but I'm interested in reading an expansion of this by someone who researches it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/23 02:20 PM
1

Yeah. Similar situation to where I was working. Factory, mostly women working there, but men do the harder jobs and get paid $1 an hour more. But here's the kicker: any women could get that extra $1 an hour if they got trained to do the heavy work even if they only had to do it for like 2 hours a week while things we're busier than usual. How many opted for it? Just 14%. Why? Because they all realize that just $1 more an hour isn't worth that much more effort and heavy work. The turnover rate fo…
/r/MensRights07/03/23 02:11 PM
2

It made me feel very discontent about myself in ways that I was content with before. I'm not against feeling ashamed about myself for not living up to who I wanna be, the problem is, the red pill's ideal man is not who I ever wanted be. But if you listen to something enough, your brain seems to just start to automatically believe it and assimilate to it. It's like the subconscious acquiesces. It's like the illusory truth effect, where exposure to the same idea over and over again will make your …
/r/ExRedPill07/03/23 01:11 PM
1

That was in regard to the stag dynamic versus the peacock. It's still the dynamic that plays out today because intrasexual competition plays a bigger role today than female choice in human male sexual selection. The thing about the article here is that it is comparing physical dominance and sexual attractiveness. Let's change the word "sexual attractiveness" to "aesthetic" for a second so we don't confound different senses of the word "attraction". Doesn't this just mean that women are attracted…
/r/ExRedPill05/03/23 03:23 PM
2

As an example, people want a partner that is kind. But kindness can easily be mistaken for niceness. As individuals seeking out kindness, women have to make hard distinctions between what acts are nice and what acts are kind which is very difficult. There are a lot of kind people that aren't nice and a lot of nice people that aren't kind. But trying to select for traits like kindness and confidence is not reductive. Well to clarify, I wasn't saying that wanting confidence in a partner is reducti…
/r/ExRedPill04/03/23 11:16 PM
1

Interesting write up, but I have to push back / inquire more on a few things. Resources are like the antlers of the masculine world. It's to show off. Displays of fat stacks and a Bugatti is a clear sign of who is at the top of the hierarchy to other men. Not to women. Women gravitate towards these men not because of resources but because of the appearance of confidence that these men display. Young women who are inexperienced oftentimes get cockiness and confidence mixed up. It takes a lifetime…
/r/ExRedPill04/03/23 08:31 PM
1

Assuming we're talking about social confidence: Confidence can also be intimidating. Many people don't care about how confident you are, especially if they're confident or socially skilled themselves. It has a threshold, ie: passed a certain point, there are no extra returns. Having a 5/10 social confidence could be just as attractive as having an 8/10 social confidence to many people. I will concluding by saying that I think that treating confidence like the almighty attraction trait is the sam…
/r/ExRedPill04/03/23 08:02 PM
7

"One problem, the term incel is widely different as involuntary celibate. I identify as an involuntary celibate and not an incel because I definitely do not support the extremism and hate towards women." Then I responded by saying this: "Incel is involuntarily celibate." Words mean what people use them to mean. Words exist before a dictionary tries to define them. All you're doing here is trying to argue that homophobia still means the fear of gay people and that you're not homophobic when you s…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 03:29 AM
3

Can we not turn this subreddit into an Andrew Tate circlejerk? It's like every few days there's a post like this. What does this have to do with critiquing and leaving the redpill behind? This is a shitpost.
/r/ExRedPill02/03/23 02:23 AM
1

Bro, most of this sub is never-been-redpillers to begin with who have no understanding of what redpill is beyond the caricaturized extremists. Here's an archetypical example.. the post was deleted but basically this person learned about redpill from r/exredpill ... Even if your comment is 90% anti-redpill with 10% "there's some worthy discussion there", like your comments have been in this thread, people will just downvote you. Like you're hitting on some key shit here, "honestly sometimes it's …
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 01:37 PM
4

If this is the case, then the red pill is not harmful because you're saying men have these ideas stored latently already. So the red pill wouldn't actually be putting any bad ideas into people's minds. But in reality, no, they did not have those beliefs -- ideas that they never knew about before -- already. Many men find out about the redpill because they're looking for advice or just to relate to other people's similar experience in a matter they're going through at the time. And often times, t…
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 01:25 PM
4

When you have a hammer everything is a nail... Feminists be analysing every single pitfall in society as being due to the "patriarchy". What is the patriarchy supposed to even mean now? Back then it was supposed to mean something like that men ruled society (ie: the politicians mostly men, the wealthiest most powerful people mostly men) and that every man benefited from this because apparently men favor other men and apparently men treat other men better than women. But even that premise was unf…
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:36 PM
0

It's not the same thing as accusing someone of cheating because it's impossible to disprove that someone was cheating. A paternal test is an easy objective way to disprove it. One is falsifiable and the other one isn't. Not even close to the same thing. Relationships go both ways. If your husband has doubts about whether the kid is his or not, would you rather him be confirmed or would you rather he live in doubt the rest of his life? We all understand why the wife would get upset. Anyone saying…
/r/ExRedPill26/02/23 01:55 PM
0

If a guy needs to see my emails, phone, texts and asks me to prove that our kid is his? One of these is not like the other....
/r/ExRedPill26/02/23 01:51 PM
1

Academic concepts are rarely ever the same in "layman" / public / real spaces. And it doesn't really matter what the academic concepts are because it ain't academics who you deal with everyday, and it ain't academics who be influencing politics or policy. This whole, "but it's different in academia" rhetoric has to stop. The movement is its people, not its papers. Westboro Baptists have the same paper as any other Christian church: the Bible, yet clearly not all Christian churches are equally un…
/r/ExRedPill23/02/23 04:12 AM
1

On the flip side, women who are raised in progressive households with egalitarian approaches to gender norms--especially if they have parents who exemplified vulnerability for men and women--probably wouldn't date men who refused to display vulnerability. That's very much my upbringing. It would be a dealbreaker for me to have a partner who repressed vulnerability or was unable to feel and express sadness, grief, fear, anger, and pain appropriately. That's emotional health and well-being 101. No…
/r/ExRedPill23/02/23 01:52 AM
2

Has your wife ever supported you during hard times in your life? The first hard times in a relationship (any relationship... including friendships) are often times what destroy that relationship. Sometimes the hard times occur 3 months after it started, sometimes the hard times occur 12 years after it started. There are a lot of apherisms that speak to actually knowing someone, like "you don't truly know someone until they have power", "you don't truly know someone until you live with them", "yo…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:10 AM
1

Ahh I hate reddit sometimes, I had a nice response typed up, 5 paragraphs and then the reply sequence fucked up and erased it all. I was gunna say as I'm getting older I also am more picky about friends, but it's not that I'm making a conscious decision of it. I'm just less stimulated by what used to make me feel connection with people: mainly non-trivial conversations and sharing our pain, experiences, life, etc. And maybe the internet is to blame for this in a way, especially reddit. Being sub…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 09:04 PM
6

Being easy to exploit is not manipulative. Or volunteering yourself to be exploited is not manipulative. It's literally altruistic but it's done in vain and also harmful to yourself. We need to stop calling everything manipulative. You don't manipulate a girl by putting her needs before yours. We're not talking about the meme "nice guys" here, we're talking about actual, "I'm a nice guy, why can't I get a girlfriend?" people. Why do "nice guys finish last?" type people... well in many cases, it'…
/r/ExRedPill20/02/23 08:28 PM
1

Why do you think you've become more picky with accepting new people as friends ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 08:03 PM
12

Yep. Everyone has a different sense of what a nice guy is. At the end of the day, being a "nice guy" seems to just be a general, pretty vague term for an archetype of a guy who has such and such red flags in the dating market. It can be applied to many different traits or behaviors, etc. Most people are going to talk about how nice guys want to trade niceness for sex... but that's not really going to help change the perspective of any nice guy. I would say don't be a "nice guy" for your own sake…
/r/ExRedPill20/02/23 02:12 PM
1

Bruh people are individuals. This group-level shit is mostly counter-productive. There was a cafe in Australia that charged men 18% more than women, because at a group-level, men made 18% more income at the time. Well, all that does is fuck over the blue collar men. Imagine if that garbage was implemented at a societal level? Like, women who earn 100k would pay less for things at the grocery store than a man making minimum wage. The shit you're proposing has the same underlying crappy rationale.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 04:27 AM
3

Very few scientific disciplines are very "cut and dry". Chemistry, physics... that's about it. Every other discipline has a lot of variation, noise, extrapolation, hypothesizing, narrative building, etc. How aggressive are lions towards humans? That depends on the lion, but there are tendencies. How well does a human being absorb iron from spinach? Well, that depends a whole lot on the individual human being. How well does this medicine work for treating high blood pressure? It probably works de…
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 02:05 PM
3

I was never a radical redpiller. But I happened upon r/purplepilldebate a few months after a good friend of mine (a woman) ghosted me, and a lot of the red pill takes made me feel "better" about the situation, like venting, like an emotional release, etc. I should mention that I was in a vulnerable state when I was ghosted because my closest friend committed suicide just a bit beforehand. For example, the girl who was my friend acted in a way that was a pretty typical case of what redpill would …
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 08:37 PM
3

I mean OP has been indoctrinated by his father to be tribalistic, but clearly he resents it and its something that pains him. He has said that he likes women of other races / not in his tribe but he feels pressure to marry within his tribe and straight up guilt that he thinks about marrying women outside of his tribe. In a romantic setting, yeah it would turn a lot of women off... but for plain old friendship? The endogamy pressure is not a rare thing. We probably all have met people who believe…
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 07:47 PM
2

Nope. The person who left that comment cannot read apparently. It's pathetic that it had 13 thumbs up when I saw it (does no one fact check? OP's profile is literally a click away). It's literally "fake news". Go thru OP's profile. OP is a Black African who feels guilty for wanting to marry outside of his tribe because of things his dad has told him. It's not even a race thing, it's a tribe thing. Example: here is a post from OP: https://www.reddit.com/r/Objectivism/comments/yna1gh/arranged_marr…
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 07:34 PM
3

I went through OP's profile to see if what you said was true and... it was not. Maybe I missed the post you saw but from what I read: OP is Black African, not White. So, "stop his kids form marrying nonwhite people", where did you find that? His actual concern is more about marrying within his tribe (and to a lesser extent race), which seems to be caused by things his dad has told him. You're being a prick you know... you're really trivializing his struggle. That battle of his has nothing to do …
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 07:32 PM
4

At that point, men were all competitors trying to bring me down. Women only cared about status and money....I almost want to call it a trap. Yep. The redpill really prevents men from having any meaningful relationships with women (including and most importantly in my opinion, friendships). Most of them don't even think having women as friends is worthwhile. Redpill gets you to think in a very transactional way about all types of relationships. It tries to quantify something that can't really be …
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 12:02 AM
4

For example, fresh and fit are two guys with no skills at all. Don't get me started on this... I hate that they always talk about how the concept of "adding value" and use themselves as good examples and I'm like, fuck no y'all don't, y'all make mad money just talking on a microphone and investing in real estate. That ain't fucking value for society. Granted, Fit did add value before, he was a drug investigator with the FBI, but in his current ways, he ain't add much value to society. And Sneako…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 11:56 PM
1

I didn't understand the logic behind it. But tbh you don't sound like you value female opinion? How do you expect redpillers to calm down and realise the logic is off, without talking to woman? You read one comment from me. Don't be making these assumptions, that I don't "value the opinion of women". You don't know me. You don't even know what my involvement with the redpill even was. I would say the same thing to someone here who was a man who was never a redpiller or had no understanding of it…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 11:41 PM
2

I've learnt a lot of redpill theories in this group. My aim was to just help people who had issues with woman, as a woman. So, you came to this subreddit, without being ex-redpill yourself or even being an anti-redpiller who was very familiar with redpill beforehand? I'm just wondering: how do you expect to help or disabuse people if you barely understand where they're coming from? For example, you can't really expect to convince a communist that communism isn't the path forward if you're not ve…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 08:27 PM
2

*Chemistry + Alignment of values doesn’t really matter as much as status or looks There are a lot of people that things like this are true for. My problem with the red-pill as a philosophy or analysis is that it treats itself as if it were universal. The red pill stuff does apply to a lot of people, but it is not universal, and I doubt it's even the majority. The type of women on Fresh and Fit: After Hours? Yeah, the red pill describes (most of) those women. The type of women on subreddits like …
/r/ExRedPill04/02/23 03:35 PM
1

I think there is this myth in modern American society that people are obligated to respond to bad faith and bigoted arguments with calmness and civility, as though taking the high road is morally imperative, when it's not. So, she wasn't even intending to label her husband as these things, but even if she did intend to, I don't see why she shouldn't have the right to call "incel, loser, misogynistic, and immature" ideologies, and the people who espouse them, exactly what they are? She was indire…
/r/ExRedPill18/01/23 04:27 PM
1

Didn't the conversation start by her husband directly calling women hoes? Not claiming that the husband engaged well either (he brought up something in a very provocative way). But you can only control yourself... you can insult and escalate, you can agree to disagree, you can disagree calmly and civilly, among other things. Insulting was one of the worst reactions OP could've had. Getting physically violent would've been worse, but that's no consolation prize. Both people acted immaturely and i…
/r/ExRedPill16/01/23 02:43 PM
2

It's not just "one shitty view" when it's a view against part of her identity as a human being. Now I see how you operate. You're extrapolating way too much out of this and projecting so much shit onto OP's husband, imagining a bunch of stuff that wasn't included in the OP. You literally said in another comment in this thread, "I have always avoided men with too many partners, or who were into hookup culture." You are making a judgement here about men who have too high of a body count. That's a …
/r/ExRedPill15/01/23 07:02 PM
-2

Cheer on! Woo hoo, abandon every relationship you have with someone because they have one shitty view! Woo hoo! Woo hoo! Yes! Do you think I'm defending OP's husband's view? I'm not. All I'm saying is: the idea that abandoning people because they disagree with you and hold one shitty view is a shitty parasitic way of operating. I've been there: I've damaged relationships because I was weak and couldn't agree to disagree on shit. So I don't enable or cheer on other people doing the same. Alternat…
/r/ExRedPill15/01/23 06:53 PM
-1

If he wants to do what's best for his child, he should cherish the child's mother, and quit degrading her or worrying about other women. Yes, he should. But this post is about OP, not her husband. We aren't talking to the husband. We only have contact with the OP. Both of them are being immature. There is no reason to cheer on or support OP for insulting her husband inasmuch as there is no reason to support her husband for divorcing. They both did immature shit. Cheering on shitty behavior does …
/r/ExRedPill15/01/23 06:41 PM
1

They have a newborn kid together. No. They both have to put their egos aside and put the relationship before their egos. And that means not insulting someone because they have a differing view than you do. And that means not filing for divorce because you got insulted by the other.
/r/ExRedPill15/01/23 06:26 PM
4

You didn't engage well in that conversation. You indirectly called him a “incel, loser, misogynistic, immature man". Insulting someone, that's not going to solve any problem; that's not going to disabuse him of certain views. All that's going to do is add more fuel to the fire. Also: it takes strength to "agree to disagree". Getting hellbent on a view like, "I think such and such genocide is justified", alright, maybe that's something you never want to "agree to disagree" on... but, "women with …
/r/ExRedPill15/01/23 06:05 PM
4

At that point it seems like it would become harder to accurately define what essentially makes up half the population of the world. Welcome to intro semantics, my friend! There's a whole sub-field of linguistics dedicated to how we connect meaning to words / categorize things. The classical theory of categorization is that we categorize things by the properties or traits they have. However, to my understanding, this isn't a widely held view by linguistics. Prototype theory and exemplar theory ar…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 06:13 AM
8

I don't know. I've always found it strange when people say things like, "you're a man when you're honest, responsible, etc." because it's like... ideally, women should be those things too. What your dad was talking about here is virtues. So are there virtues based on sex / gender? Most seem to be virtuous for both. For example, are there any virtues that men should strive for that women shouldn't, and vice versa? There are certainly virtues that are emphasized via sex, but what virtue is seen as…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 05:42 AM
7

The reason why it's normal to smile and laugh even when something isn't funny is to signal friendliness or general interest in some type of association or relationship (ie: friendship, workplace friends, friendly acquaintances, etc.) with that person. If you smile at someone, it gives that person more confidence and comfort around you. If you mean mug them, that strips them of confidence and comfort around you. If you don't want someone to be around you, then feel free to not smile. But it is no…
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 06:23 PM
6

Since when did hating serial killers solve that problem? Seems like serial killers still exist and stay killing, despite the hatred against them.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 02:44 PM
1

Please try to interpret opposing views in charitable ways. I never said women were "most affected", I said that it also has negative effects on women, and that I'm not about the oppression Olympics so I don't care who is affected more by it. All I care about is that there are negative effects. Think of it like: I don't want to see a quantity map (how much exists), I want to a see a quality map (whether it exists or not). My feminist critique is more radical than yours (mine: has negative effects…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 02:47 PM
0

Let me define what I mean by "toxic": bad for your mind; conducive to harmful cognitive behavior. I can't speak on behalf of women, but as a "visible minority" who was "intoxicated" by wokism, I don't see why feminism would have a different dynamic on women's psyches. Wokism taught me to be a victim and that I was not able to overcome x, y and z. It taught me to overestimate, upplay my disadvantages. Doesn't feminism teach women much of the same? This shit had awful consequences on my psyche, my…
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 12:07 AM
3

There are certain shitty mentalities or mindsets that we are socialized into having. For example, people always want to compare struggle, pain or oppression like it's a competition. This is a central feature of modern feminism: they market / advertise / propagandize as if women are handily winning this "competition". My take is that this "competition" is stupid and it doesn't matter. A lot of neo-leftists nowadays are so focused on playing this victimhood bingo game that they start to disregarde…
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 09:08 PM
3

Well, regardless of who it's more toxic to, it's toxic to both sexes. If you disagree, make your case. I'm all ears.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 08:42 PM
6

self entitled, spoilt, western, white women, who were raised to think they are princesses and have nothing of substance apart from their looks. With such a superficial understanding of an ideology you're against, you're destined to fail. This is the equivalent of people saying that "men's rights is just a bunch of self entitled, women hating, insecure men who were raised to think women are their property". The only way you'll ever be able to write a case against modern feminism is if you can ste…
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 03:50 PM
4

Being jealous isn't a bad thing to society, but it's a bad thing to yourself. Here's the thing about easy-to-produce products or services... because they're easy to produce, a lot of people produce them. So, the consequence is that the competition is insane in that domain. Being a successful OnlyFans lady is mostly about marketing. So basically, if you haven't been able to make it in say, freelance graphic design, freelance music production, freelance video editing, freelance writing, freelance …
/r/ExRedPill19/11/22 02:39 PM
2

Well, most things that are freelance are not easy gigs because you have to do all the marketing. I used to do "side-hustle producing", ie: someone who makes a lot of hip-hop beats (or there are some who RnB, afro dancehall, reggaeton, etc.) and tries to sell them online... and from the outside looking in, it looks like a great gig; I can't tell you how many friends have told me that I should "start selling music online, you can make a ton of money like x", and I'm like, "I've tried it a handful …
/r/ExRedPill19/11/22 02:29 PM
1

I'm not looking to be mad, I'm trying to understand why you think being repulsed by a certain type of sex means your homophobic. Why does feeling grossed out seeing two men have sex mean you're homophobic? Why is it wrong to feel grossed out? This doesn't mean you treat gay people worse. This doesn't mean you're prejudiced against them. It just means you aren't comfortable with a certain visual stimuli. And that is why I used the two 80 year olds having sex example as well. Why is it -phobic to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 04:05 PM
1

So sex repulsed asexuals are both homophobic and heterophobic? Is Being repulsed by two 80 year olds banging ageism?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:56 AM
1

I like the "we sleep in separate rooms" arrangement. But LAT, well I wouldn't want that much distance. One of the joys of a relationship is sharing the mundane moments of life, like eating, watching tv, being in their presence while relaxing, ability to converse whenever...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:21 AM
89

Doesn't seem that bad to me. She doesn't seem entitled, just very delusional. She swipes "no" on 90% of men but claims she just wants a 5/10 ... when it's like: no, you want a 9/10 according to your swiping habits.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/22 09:39 PM
11

Last night I was just having a conversation with my buddy and he went on a vacation to Europe and he fucked a few prostitutes, and he told me that he didn't like it. He said it wasn't the same as getting with a girl genuinely, because there was no intimacy, sincere care or connection. But on the other side, I have a friend who has spent tens of thousands of dollars on prostitutes, and he likes having sex with them. The psychological needs for each person are very different. I on the other hand a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/22 07:26 PM
2

No. It is for "goods" defined as: "any consumer products used, bought, or rendered primarily for personal, family, or household purposes." Basically, the law would only apply if there were two products that were basically identical (ie: same material, ingredients, form, etc.) but one gender-based variant costs more. So for example, women's t-shirts will still cost more than men's t-shirts because their physical forms are different and the women t-shirt's are more complex. They highlight the roun…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:03 PM
3

Doesn't apply to drinks. From the bill: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill\_id=202120220AB1287 (2) “Goods” means any consumer products used, bought, or rendered primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:41 PM
6

This would be an sucessfull antidote to red pill, because red pill relies that they are the only ones in the market that offers theory with "science" (really are distorted stats but works for RP) Science is always used selectively. The proposed white pill would be just as bias as the red pill is, because (1) its would-be origins are of being the antithesis of the red pill, and (2) it's impossible to find and read every single scientific study related to your field. For example, nutrition experts…
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 03:12 PM
0

Everyone has a stomach pooch if they breathe properly using the diaphram. A lot of people look flatter / trimmer than they really are because they don't use the diaphragm when they breathe, so the stomach area doesn't expand. Not tryna get too off topic here but this is a legit unrealistic body standard that has fucked with people's healths and causing them to breathe suboptimally because they look fat when doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:01 PM
1

I talk about my feelings with my friends. The onus is on you to initiate these conversations and to ensure everybody feels comfortable during them. It's not easy with new people but once you've done it a couple times with a certain friend, those convos are easy to have. A lot of men like to talk about sex and avoid emotional talks due to pluralistic ignorance, not nature. Read about pluralistic ignorance, it will enrich your understanding of male interactions.
/r/ExRedPill19/08/22 01:27 PM
2

They're raised to THINK they're self-reliant but in reality they live in the most labor-specialized force in the world... people are dependent on others for 90%+ of their life. Grow your own food? No? Make your own cooking pots? Even if you did... Did you mine the ore that was used to make the pot? People really think cause they go to a grocery store and buy food that other people grew, that other people harvested, that other people transported to that store, that they're self-reliant... everybo…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 08:16 PM
2

I'm very against racialism in general (ie: I hate when people ask me what my race is, I'd rather not know what other people's race is, I'd rather we move on racially classifying people, etc.)... but come on bro your comment here is pseudoclever. You're "native American" but not "Native American". The cultural identities of Indigenous Americans, First Nations, Native Americans, whatever term you want to use, is distinct from the cultural groups in the USA which are descendants of colonials. The t…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:40 PM
1

Has nothing to do with that. MRA is not about race, sexuality or religion. Where do you see the black men complaining about racism in MRA forums? Where are the Latino men talking about racism in MRA forums? Quit victimizing yourself. White Christian men are welcome in the MRA spaces, just don't co-opt the forum with white and Christian issues.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 08:20 PM
0

At worst you might get robbed if you look soft at the wrong time in the wrong place, but bro lmao nobody on site killing, mobbing, jumping or raping white guys when they step foot into a black neighborhood.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 08:17 PM
1

But that isn't a men's rights issue. That's a different issue. You can't allow your forum to be co-opted by other ideologies or movements. Make your own subreddit to discuss anti-whiteness or anti-heterosexuality. Men's rights is a separate issue and all co-option posts should be removed. "I feel discriminated for being straight" is not a men's rights issue. It's a different phenomenon going on there. Make your own space for that separate but valid issue.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 08:10 PM
1

It's a men's rights page. It's not about race or religion. You should prolly find or create a subreddit that is dedicated to "anti-wokism". I've seen too many posts in that sub about anti-white racism and like, yea I see it. I'm not white but I see the anti-white stuff by neo-leftists.... There's gonna be a lot of white kids who grow up with self-aversion and it's sad. But that sub is about men, not white men, so I roll my eyes every time I see a post about anti-white discrimination in that subr…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 07:55 PM
4

Re: victim mentality Wokism in general teaches people (at least non white people, it teaches white people they're oppressors and are handed everything in life -- which is also toxic) they're a victim and that being a victim merits respect and is virtuous. I was infected with that ideology until 26 years old and it hindered my ass a lot and I'll pay the consequences for that for a few years more at a minimum. For example, It stripped me of my confidence I had prior to being 16 and it made me thin…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 09:02 PM
3

A product of victim hood is a virtue culture. Objectively speaking, one who mansplains is using their time and intellectual labor to properly explain something instead of lazily doing it or not doing it at all. Its generous to mansplain or overexplain things but victim hood is a virtue up here
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:54 AM
1

Simple answer, if you get 50% custody then you should be paying a reasonable amount of child support If you get minimal custody then likewise your child support should match and be minimal If you get no custody / visitation at all then i'm sure you know where this is going.. ​ So if you're a piece of shit who lost custody because of abuse and neglect, you're off the hook from paying child support? Child support is about the child, it's not about the parents and therefore it's not a fee for havin…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:39 PM
1

Obesity is linked with early puberty and there are more obese children nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 10:54 AM
1

They can be how they be. The only annoying thing is how they are projecting their desires, emotions, instincts, wants, etc., onto humanity as a whole. That's the dullard shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 09:15 PM
0

You can’t actually feel someone looking at you. The way a woman knows a man is looking at her is because she is also looking at him. If he’s guilty of looking at her, then the reverse is also true. You can look at someone and then look away and then look again in 5 seconds and realize someone is staring at you. Or you can glance at someone and you can tell by their gaze if they've been staring or they're also just glancing. Looking at is not staring at someone for 25 minutes. The other day some …
/r/MensRights30/04/22 08:50 PM
-11

Literally that has nothing to do with the story. The guy was staring at her for 25 minutes, and that included him getting off at the same stop as her and staring at her while she waited for the next bus. Get back in reality. Women feel wary of stranger men like men feel wary of gang members. If a gang member was staring at you on the bus, what would you think? Or maybe you're Superman and you'd feel 100% comfortable, but the average man would be scared. Men's Rights has a lot of valid points. Bu…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 08:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter