~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.Like I said, it's not a zero sum game. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 10:06 PM |
| 2 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.I'm sorry too. I mistook this reddit for an intellectual forum, not realizing that you guys have made up your mind and discount all contrary evidence. Trying to have a reasonable discussion with you guys is like talking to Tea Partiers or 9/11 truthers. It's no wonder most people dismiss you as conspiracy theory loons. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 06:09 PM |
| 2 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.It doesn't mandate the child go to the mother. This is just the Michigan branch. It does not necessarily represent the beliefs of the national group as a whole. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 05:57 PM |
| 1 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.Your evidence? | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 05:48 PM |
| 2 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.No talking about Marxists, Socialists, Capitalists, White people, black people. These examples actually prove my point since they, like feminists, have wildly different beliefs from one another. If that is your standard of proof in order to make statements about feminists You're putting words in my mouth, I never said read ALL of them. I just suggested you read ONE of them, since she's one of the leading feminist writers. You propose that we simply stop discussing feminism altogether. Again, you… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 05:41 PM |
| 1 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.You're getting side-tracked. I'm saying Betty Friedan is important. I'm not saying that you need to AGREE with everything the organization says. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 05:35 PM |
| 2 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.Uh, the founder of NOW and one of the most influential feminist writers ever? She's kind of a big deal. Also, you have no right to say ALL FEMINISTS believe this or that, unless you know what ALL of them believe. You can't even say MOST unless you have read MOST feminist literature. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 03:44 PM |
| 3 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.The first chapter of her 1963 book The Feminine Mystique is available online: http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/ows/seminars/tcentury/FeminineMystique.pdf Google books has the 2001 edition of The Feminine Mystique, and you can read the introductions which have her take on more recent issues. Norah Vincent's book Self-Made Man is very good too. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 01:09 PM |
| 0 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.No mainstream feminist organisation has ever fought for a substantive issues for men That doesn't mean that they were actively working against men. Rights are not a zero-sum game. We can both have rights. But each group has its focus. Criticizing groups like NOW for not advancing men's rights is like criticizing PETA for not advocating gay marriage. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 12:53 PM |
| 7 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.Again, not all feminists hate men. And for many feminists, it has been about equality. What about getting women the right to vote? Or serve on juries? Those are simple matters of equality that women in the past campaigned for. You're veering into a no-true-scotsman fallacy. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 12:50 PM |
| 7 | A Voice for Men raises $5000 in only 3 days (we're coming for you, feminists)What are you going to do with the feminists when you catch them? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 10:48 PM |
| 4 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.Not everyone, just you. If you're going to insult feminists as a group, then yes, you should know what you're talking about. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 10:31 PM |
| 15 | No, I'd say this is the tip of the iceberg regarding that is wrong with Rights4Men movement.I would say MensRights has a few bad eggs, but the bad eggs are numerous and very vocal. I'm pretty sick of people here bashing women and lumping all feminists together in one ugly stereotype. If you think all feminists hate men and want to emasculate them, you've never read Betty Friedan. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 09:55 PM |
| 2 | As the mod of mensrights, I openly argue for the rights of anyone 'who presently has, used to have, or desires to have a penis.'If feminists were correct in their assertion that there is essentially no difference between "men" and "women" except for external genitalia, Which feminists say this? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 09:53 PM |
| 3 | Vagina Monologues, not that wholesomeThis blind pig may have stumbled on a couple of acorns, but he's mostly just nuts. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 12:39 PM |
| 1 | What are male privileges?That's really rude of you to say that. Why is it embarrassing? Someone asked the question, and I answered. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 05:11 AM |
| 1 | "What about teh menz" applauds feministing for publishing a dishonest and disrespectful article about male victims of sexual harassment.Well, my advice is that in the future you read the article so you understand the context of the discussion rather than jumping straight to the comments and making assumptions about what other people believe. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 11:49 PM |
| 3 | "What about teh menz" applauds feministing for publishing a dishonest and disrespectful article about male victims of sexual harassment.Neither I nor the author of the article ever said or suggested that rape of men or harassment of men is not important or that these are gendered crimes. I think people are taking one stray fact mentioned in the article and blowing it all out of proportion. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 11:44 PM |
| 1 | "What about teh menz" applauds feministing for publishing a dishonest and disrespectful article about male victims of sexual harassment.But the author is acknowledging that sexual harassment against men is real. She just said women are harassed more than men are. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 11:42 PM |
| 1 | "What about teh menz" applauds feministing for publishing a dishonest and disrespectful article about male victims of sexual harassment.It's not a victimhood pissing contest at all. I am a man and an advocate for equal rights for all, and it is my understanding that women are more often the recipients of sexual harassment than men. I don't know anyone who has ever claimed otherwise. So I don't see the point of trashing a whole article that is sympathetic towards men just because the author pointed out what is common knowledge. EDIT: I'm trying to be serious and respectful here. If you feel the need to downvote, at least have the… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 07:39 PM |
| 3 | What are male privileges?In general, on average, men earn more money and are more likely to be promoted in certain highly paid professional occupations. This is the situation in the US. In other countries, women have things much worse, understood. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 04:50 PM |
| 2 | "What about teh menz" applauds feministing for publishing a dishonest and disrespectful article about male victims of sexual harassment.I do not find the Feministing article to be dishonest or disrespectful at all. I don't understand what you're trying to say. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 04:29 PM |
| 6 | How many subscribers in this sub think feminism is a good thing?Why can't we be equal and different? You can, but people deserve to be able to choose any role they want without legal pressure or social pressure enforcing the differences. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/11 01:23 PM |
| 2 | What, exactly, do the men of r/mensrights want out of romantic relationships with women?Love, companionship, sex? Same thing any person wants from a relationship? What an odd question. Did you assume that because men want to be treated equally under the law they must hate women? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/11 06:01 PM |
| 2 | Can anyone find me a wife? The dilemma of ugly men.Not really a rights issue. This guy has other problems. He's an average looking guy by most accounts. And living in a trailer park and having no money has not stopped millions of trailer-dwellers (even ugly ones) from marrying. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/11 05:45 PM |
| 1 | Is anyone else annoyed by the silent endorsement of gender roles like this?Whenever I read something like that on reddit, I just remind myself that at least I'm not reading Youtube comments. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Scott Adams wants men chemically castrated. Is this a joke?I think he's saying it should be an option, not mandatory. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/11 10:03 PM |
| 1 | Second paragraph. "...certain feminist groups consider the idea of comparing male and female genital cutting to be both offensive and unsubstantiated." Excuse me?Certain men do to. The foreskin brigade is entitled to their own opinions, but I'm just fine the way I am, wouldn't have it otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/11 04:48 AM |
| 1 | "Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am, a demonstration for our right to show off our cash. Against those who blame the victims of robberies. We don't deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized. Its my hot money, I do what I want!I don't have a problem with the slut walk. I think it's more indicative of some kind of feeling of inferiority on the part of those women, a feeling like they are so powerless that the only way they can express themselves is through theatrical acting out. Rather than criticize these kinds of facile street theatre though, I'd rather encourage both men and women to take real pride in themselves. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/11 04:29 AM |
| 3 | Wow, this girl actually understandsI like that background music. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/11 01:51 PM |
| 3 | I honestly don't understand why men are not angrier. Women use the police, courts, politicians, media to bully you, lie about you, take your stuff, put you in jail. They take your kids away in divorces. No group in history has been so passive in the face of clear injustice as have Western men.It's because we are all so wealthy and powerful. :/ | /r/MensRights | 07/06/11 12:56 PM |
| 5 | Went to a wedding, nice couple, late 20s. The Reverend was a women who used the ceremony to 'roast' the man. The bride was 'rescuing him', would 'make him a man', 'fix his life'. He was to do whatever she told him, try not to screw up badly and be grateful that ANY women wanted him, etc.Hmm, maybe not as part of the ceremony itself, but certainly these are old jokes that people tell at weddings and during toasts and speeches at the reception. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/11 02:05 AM |
| 2 | Went to a wedding, nice couple, late 20s. The Reverend was a women who used the ceremony to 'roast' the man. The bride was 'rescuing him', would 'make him a man', 'fix his life'. He was to do whatever she told him, try not to screw up badly and be grateful that ANY women wanted him, etc.People make the same jokes at every wedding, no matter who is officiating. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/11 09:01 PM |
| 2 | A NZ woman tricked young men, via Facebook, to have a relationship with her using a fake profile. One kid even took his life. Police still haven't charged her.It does say she slept with a minor 8 years ago, but she was 19 at the time. As for the current so-called "victims", the article says "young men" not "little boys" and the only guy whose age is mentioned is 21. And she didn't even have sex with him or even meet him in person. 21 is WAAAAAAY too old to be all butt-hurt about a fake online relationship with someone you've never met. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/11 05:26 PM |
| 2 | A NZ woman tricked young men, via Facebook, to have a relationship with her using a fake profile. One kid even took his life. Police still haven't charged her.I put victims in quotation marks because the only thing these stunted man-boys are victims of is their own delusion. They fell for a con artist? Sucks to be them. But this has nothing to do with men's issues or rights. The woman didn't even do anything illegal. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/11 04:51 PM |
| -1 | A NZ woman tricked young men, via Facebook, to have a relationship with her using a fake profile. One kid even took his life. Police still haven't charged her.I've always thought people who have online-only "relationships" are an odd bunch. But anyone who kills themself over a failed relationship has personal problems, not legal ones. I'm not even a macho guy, not by a long shot, but I still think these "victims" need to man the fuck up and move on with their lives and get real girlfriends. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/11 02:33 PM |
| 1 | Man's wife cheats on him, RA response is that it's his fault for not "manning up"/r/relationshipadvice is moderated by notorious trolls who established it just to ridicule people. Pay them no mind. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 11:50 PM |
| 2 | Rejected from being a sperm donor, sperm bank refuses to say whyMaybe they have too many blonde WASPs on file and they're looking to expand their selection of Jews and brown-haired types. Or maybe they found you have a genetic defect. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 12:29 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter