TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beefdx Archive

View 1 posts and 124 comments by beefdx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
63

Feminismbeefdx/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Buy low with your disposable income and ride it out until it pays off. Recessions are pretty much the most no-brainer way to make a killing in the markets provided that you don't lose your job. Just keep investing and don't sell until it becomes clear that the economy has recovered.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 01:58 AM
1

I get that, but the title of the thread it's 'odd that the reaction is that it should be a crime' rather than 'it's shouldn't matter because paternity fraud exists.' - The entire premise presented by the title is that we shouldn't be treating it like a crime because we don't treat paternity fraud like a crime, which is ridiculous and delegitimizes the MRM's stance.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:51 PM
1

Okay great so let's prosecute that doctor for being a dick, and then advocate for means to deal with paternity fraud. It's not a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:18 PM
7

Wait, so the woman was getting invitro and the doctor used his own sperm? If she chose a donor and they used any other sperm than the one she agreed to use, that's really fucked up, and I would say definitely constitutes a crime.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:57 PM
3

I've never heard of that. They classify that as contemplation of suicide, versus attempting suicide. They then further separate contemplation of suicide into vague contemplation such as thinking about killing yourself with no specific plan or method, versus specific contemplation where you plot out in actual detail what you might do, when you might do it, etc. Attempt is pretty much only classified starting when you actually begin to carry out actions as a part of a specific plan to kill yoursel…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 10:56 PM
2

Because the nature of a marriage contract makes separating inherently more difficult, as where a girlfriend has virtually no legal barriers to just taking off, not paying the mortgage, and then fucking you over for the money. With marriage you can get a prenup and include clauses for things such as infidelity or how the finances get distributed if she decides to just fuck off with her financial duties.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 04:42 PM
3

Not that I think these people actually appreciate men's humanity, but nonetheless; do they not realize how ridiculously patronizing that entire concept is? Basically saying that men, as a collective, would fuck robots that resemble women, and that doing so would foster some disconnect between the humanity of women who roughly resemble these robots? Men are so dumb we couldn't tell the difference between women and robots unless feminists told us. We certainly couldn't figure out that fucking wome…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:42 PM
1

The premise comes from the mistaken belief that all power structures and privileges are unilaterally pro-male. Fighting for women's rights and privileges therefor is justified because anything that gives women more moves closer to equality.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:20 PM
1

She said it’s shaped like the inside of a vagina, so it’s sexualising the women’s body. ...dildos are not shaped like the inside of a vagina. They're a small cavity that at most times is literally without shape, as the vaginal walls touch on both sides, otherwise they are a vaguely cylindrical, as are all orifices. Dildos are literally shaped like penises in most cases, or modeled roughly as penis-like shapes intended to stimulate female sex organs. How is that sexism? Honestly though, I can't s…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 10:55 PM
1

Well you gosh darn certainly shouldn't! You poor thing, with those lawmen scaring you and putting you in handcuffs, you just stole because you're getting those 73 cents on the dollar you victim you <3
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:04 AM
1

Ok but the right to vote wasn't earned for free, and these women knew that. They know that if they agreed to obtain suffrage rights, this could result in a reciprocal obligation mandated by the government to render service, so they said no and preferred not to be involved. People act like men just asked for the right to vote and got it no strings attached, hundreds of thousands of men in the US literally paid for it with their lives, and we are only a single act of congress away from reinstating…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/18 02:17 AM
1

It involves hitting them back only if they continue to attack you, and it has to constitute reasonable force, which the other lawyer will have a field day with you if this person is much smaller and weaker than you. You don't need to punch someone who flails their arms at you, that's the point. When they are credibly threatening you and keep swinging, sure, you do what you've gotta do, but like all situations, you need to read into what's going on and think before acting. I find it baffling that…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:48 AM
0

I understand what you and others are trying to get at here, but the problem is that it's far too black and white for reality. 'They hit you you hit them back' seems elegant and simple but it's not; there's absolutely nothing foolish or unreasonable about reading a situation and contextualizing the violence as well as your potential response and the consequences. This is not only the best legal advice you could follow in a situation like that but also the most practical; a slap in the face from a…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:42 AM
1

Self Defense is a plea you make to a judge when you are charged with a crime, it's not cut and dry and it's actually pretty rare. Furthermore, what justifies a legal plea of not guilty by reason of self defense varies widely by jurisdiction. Most of the time retaliation is not legally accepted as a justification of self defense, it has to be reasonably expected that the act was done to prevent further harm, so hitting a smaller person slapping you and not causing a clear and present danger becau…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:25 AM
2

I thought you were done with me, but evidently you're not even capable of sticking to your own resolutions because you have the emotional maturity and train of thought reminiscent of an autistic kindergartener. Mediation involves having other people talk a situation down, asking someone to stop hitting you can actually stop them by simply appealing to a desire for them to not hit you. Other people talking them down is also highly effective, and involves no implication or threat of credible viole…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:08 PM
0

Violence noun behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. law the unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force. None of those things constitutes an act of violence, or is inherently a threat of violence. The fact that violence could be implied does not in and of itself make it a violent act. And since none of those actions are an unlawful form of intimidation or a physical act, given that you are attempting to r…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:43 PM
1

telling someone to stop isn't violence. Having someone else step in and mediate isn't violent Having a present authority escort or reprimand someone isn't violent. You're playing with yourself. If uppity women were often met with violence, they'd stop initiating violence towards men.... making the world more peaceful. Because beating down women is a sure way to keep women from being violent, when most violent women are violent specifically because they've been past victims of violence themselves…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:29 PM
1

How about telling them to back the fuck off you, or using someone else to mediate, or having a bouncer or whoever else kick their ass to the curb? And don't just pretend that police are suddenly off the table when people are violent because you think somehow they're biased against you. An uppity woman slaps you and you think the only solution is to smack her up, that clearly tells me you don't have much experience in conflict resolution. You can, believe it or not, diffuse a violent situation in…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:57 PM
2

Whenever I hear about these kinds of strikes or walkouts you inevitably see this small contingent of women take the day off and rally, meanwhile their bosses just shuffle their workloads around and maybe call in some people, and the end result is they come to work the next day and everyone is pretty much unphased. Strikes really only work when people are willing to en-masse sacrifice their own well-being to impact the bottom line, and that can't happen in a day of striking. If these women actual…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:38 PM
1

Auto-feeders
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:34 PM
0

And to just accept it, because reasons. The reason is because dispensing a violent attack even as a means of retaliation is often unnecessary and is almost always very precarious legally. Normalizing means to make normal, if advocating non-violent resolutions when possible is not helping to reduce violence then what the fuck are we even doing? And to encourage everyone to not hit anybody Ok that sounds aweso... but if you do, expect to be hit back Wait a minute... I know what you're saying sound…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:24 PM
0

That's sexist dear. How is it sexist? some women are fragile, some men are fragile too, I don't advocate violence against either of them. Sounds like feminist bullshit to me to say that it's only wrong to call a woman fragile. Defending yourself from an attacker is not "beating the crap out" someone. It's defending yourself. Right, defense is explicitly about protecting yourself from harm, it has nothing to do with causing harm to another. If they hit you, hitting them back is only defending you…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:12 PM
1

Oh dear, encouraging people to appreciate the nuance of different situations where one is acted upon violently, and maybe, just maaaaaybe choosing not to go tit-for-tat is normalizing violence? I've got a feeling, so lemme guess; you've likely never had much experience with training in martial arts or engaging in fights have you? Standing by while someone, obviously weaker and incapable of hurting you, tries and fails to hurt you is not normalizing violence; it's being a bigger fucking person an…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:04 PM
-2

The majority of adult women who will try to wail on you or casually hit you are basically the same level of dangerous as a child, yeah. a 130lb woman with no training or rigorous exercise regiment is weak, that's why I feel no need to hit her. Instead we get you chimps who think promotion of gender equality and justice is to treat everyone like shit, so you advocate wailing on fragile women because it never occurred to you that equal treatment can also mean not jumping to violence against anyone…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:58 AM
1

Pacifism and mercy is normalizing violence, yeah right, thanks. I'll try to remember that next time I'm not beating someone down who is feebly attempting but failing to harm me.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:49 AM
2

Well first off the easiest way to avoid this is to just vet women before dating or fucking. There are only certain kinds of women who do that shit, learn some warning signs and go with your gut, and you're avoiding 95% of all possible conflicts. Second, as said news outlets make this seem like the volume is huge but really it's not; most hookups are not ending with rape accusations, it happens but it's relatively rare. Finally there are things you can do to compile information which casts seriou…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/18 08:02 AM
0

Oh shit, my pride, what shall I do?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:32 AM
-1

I'm not arguing what the laws are. So why did you bring up that specific law? It seemed like you were attempting to argue that contextually it fits into that law, when it's basically the opposite. It's fine if you acknowledge that it's irrelevant I'm just not sure why you mentioned it. My point is, the law is wrong. Your alternative is that we would morally, and perhaps down the road legally justify retaliation in broader forms? I know you think that sounds better, but it sucks ass. People used …
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:20 AM
1

Mutual Combat laws are super vague and are effectively mothballed in many jurisdictions, but involves mutual and agreed terms to enter into a fight. It's basically absent from common law at this point, but here, the judgment from People v Jones: "Mutual combat is defined as a fight or struggle entered into by both parties willingly or a mutual fight upon a sudden quarrel and in hot blood upon equal terms where death results from the combat. The evidence must show the confrontation was mutual, an…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:12 AM
-2

Not my problem. It kinda is though. Ill face my consequences, just like they will for hitting me. Right, you'll be reprimanded for whatever level of violence you commit in the context that you commit it. That's the point; the context matters, as it always has, as it always will. ittle people shouldn't get "dont hit me" privelages while they can walk around hitting whoever they want. They don't, they still have to face the law and the natural consequences of threatening people who are obviously s…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:52 AM
-3

Full grown women are still like 5' 4" tall, they still weigh like 130lbs, they're little, they're not a threat to you unless you have paulsey. In my experience, the people who are most gung-ho about "you hit me you better make it count" are the sorts of people you only need to worry about exploding and making a mess of an ordinary situation. And again, yes, being bigger socially obligates you to be more discretionary about hurting people. Western civilization firmly believes that with power come…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:26 AM
1

this is why women feel they have license to strike men. Beating up weak people who get out of line isn't going to make society a better place. It's not your job to teach women their place with violence. you have someone go way past self defense in an attempt to make a point. The specific example was about making an example of people who assault you, so I was actually right on point; he attacked you, so you made an example of him. And then you wonder why they never learn.... Again, you're not the…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:19 AM
-2

I get the sentiment of wanting to feel like you, not being the instigator, get to just do what you please, but where do we draw the line on that? A woman, half your size, completely harmless, dumb-drunk bimbo who gets it in her head that you're to be trifled with, feebly slaps you in the face. Do you feel morally justified cold-cocking her tiny fragile head and watching her limply hit the floor? Frankly, I'd say it wasn't the right thing to do. Yes, she started it, but what she started was a hol…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:05 AM
-1

Well actually to some extent yeah you do have to be the bigger adult and walk away. If a person comes up to you and hits you, and you hit them back, you're still committing a crime. You may then try to argue to a judge that your retaliation was justified, but you're still obligated to post a defense because you broke the rules. Frankly, I'm actually quite ok with that system. If the person is way smaller and weaker than you, there's almost no way the judge is going to give you the pass unless yo…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 04:47 AM
4

I don't feel it had all that much to do with the hollow-ringing "let's include women, even though we're the ones who have been 'excluding' them all this time" bit, but more to do with the fact that Hollywood and the academy are increasingly out of touch with mainstream America. Left and Right of the political spectrum, people are increasingly tired of hearing rich stuck-up assholes talk about the importance of inclusion and standing up for the underprivileged, when they themselves are social eli…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 04:12 AM
-15

Eh, I personally find no reason to 'defend' myself against individuals who are functionally incapable of harming me sans using a weapon. I completely agree if you are in legitimate danger, but I take a certain level of pride in being completely unphased by what could at best be considered an attempted assault by someone who weighs 1/2 of what I do. For an example, imagine if a 4th grader just started wailing their little fists at you; would you bop them in the nose? You really couldn't be faulte…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:56 AM
14

All I saw was a man raping and disenfranchising a woman while she propped up civilization and saved the environment from certain devastation.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:50 AM
3

The 4th wave feminist paradox; if there are no barriers to entry, then one's gender status is inherently irrelevant.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:28 AM
1

The irony is that most people who have these kinds of conversations honestly just don't know what the other side has to say. The feminist answer instead of trying to have a legitimate discussion about gendered issues, seems to be to patronize people that would likely be sympathetic to their problems. Feminists; please, womansplain the shit out of feminist issues to me. Feel no need to reserve the facts you believe you posses; I am in no way afraid of your interpretation of reality, even if I fin…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:14 AM
1

This doesn't make a difference to this idea that you are presenting that we leave these calls up to experts; these doctors just give them the drugs they want, they hardly give a shit whether it's completely inadvisable, and most doctors are completely aware that the mental health outcomes for transgender people before and after treatment are the same. The point is, doctors don't really care if it's a good idea or not, they just give you what you ask for. A hormonal child or their parents are the…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:14 AM
1

Ok and so the fact that your doctor took minor efforts to do their due diligence means you think they seriously vetted whether or not that was a recommendable way to handle yours or any other person's situation? They walked through the paces with you, those doctors don't often turn people down in those situations, they basically just walk you through, they make their recommendation, they hardly ever fight. It takes more effort for people to get a doctor to prescribe pain medications in most juri…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:04 AM
1

I know a person who did it at age 16, it was very easy for them, they essentially had to get their parents to sign off on it. I also know people who easily obtain hormones without a doctor. I am sure that some people have to jump through hoops with certain doctors, but plenty of people don't. If it was that tightly controlled, then it would barely ever happen except it happens constantly because most doctors know if they say no somebody else will say yes or they will get the drugs illegally so a…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:54 AM
4

Ok but experts don't tell kids what they have to do, they just prescribe them drugs they ask for. If the doctors weren't giving them the drugs they want they'd still be getting sued, so they just let the parents make the call and put it on them. The bottom line is the parents are giving their child hormonal treatment with or without a doctor's recommendation, so the ones making the actual decisions are by no means experts. Agree or disagree with it, it's not experts making these calls, most expe…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:24 PM
2

It's really quite sad how so many women, unjustly afraid of women being excluded from work spaces in a discriminatory fashion, would do the precise thing they claim to want to safeguard against, as if this is some game of tit-for-tat. Furthermore, it's tragic how so many of these women fail to recognize how fundamental the work of men is to our society. I am in no way claiming women are not valuable contributors; but to pretend that coal miners, lumberjacks, oil workers, construction workers, ge…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 11:40 AM
1

And the kicker is that since it's a felony, if you're convicted, you also lose your right to vote permanently. By the carrot or by the stick, you will do it.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:02 PM
3

I don't disagree that she is probably trashy and self-absorbed for freaking out about the proposal, but the dude is equally as silly for taking what ought to be a personal and intimate thing and doing it in a gas station. If it was supposedly some romantic impulse, then it shows that the guy lacks the proper judgment to figure out that it's a shit idea, and in that sense they're both at fault and need to do better for themselves.
/r/MGTOW12/02/18 11:36 AM
52

"Crying: Acceptable at funerals, and the Grand Canyon" - Ron Swanson
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 04:28 AM
10

At least it lead to a catharsis. Good for you though on sticking to your guns; it always feels easy in situations like that to cave in, but it's important to experience those initial feelings of dread when you put your foot down.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/18 02:49 AM
4

The bottom line is that this is arguing based on a very specific anecdote, and albeit troubling, this does not reflect what happens in all situations. Using this as an exclusive example is the textbook definition of cherry-picking; how many times do they view the boy scouts and the girl scouts interacting with the public? And of those interactions, what kind are they paying attention to; just the bad ones? Or both good and bad interactions? Furthermore, if you consider the ways people interact w…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:56 AM
0

Small addition is that most punishments are intended to be taken on account of the likelihood of a relapse of behavior. If someone kidnaps, tortures, and repeatedly rapes someone, there's a good chance that they would do it again. If someone gets drunks at a party, starts fooling around with a girl, and she passes out behind a dumpster, that person may have fucked up, but they're probably not likely to go around raping people. In this way punishment is a deep analysis of individuals with the des…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:03 AM
5

The officer said that the allegation caused him depression and anxiety, leading him to take off work for six months. He said that the issue caused strain in his marriage, as well. This is one of the things I think so many people miss with the lasting affect of being accused falsely of rape. Your personal relationships go immediately into the toilet and even if you may later be cleared it can be hard or impossible to repair, and you can't really put a price on having your marriage ruined because …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:55 PM
1

Sentencing them Hammurabi-style seems unnecessary; just sentence them in accordance with filing a false police report, possibly additional fines based on usage of police resources, and then let people seek damages in a civil court for what they consider to be justifiable based on potential lost income/punitive damages.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:32 PM
2

The 4th time.
/r/MGTOW19/12/17 10:54 AM
2

The fucked up part is that lawyers will basically tell women to say that stuff whether or not it's true, because they know it works and there's really no way to prove they're lying. Family Courts are basically just kangaroo courts at this point.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 09:37 AM
2

Since when is getting 2 knives and coming back 10 minutes later before threatening, and then stabbing someone involuntary manslaughter? That sounds like 2nd degree murder to me.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 09:18 AM
2

Sure, but fitness directly correlates with overall effectiveness, and carrying heavy loads on marches without stopping or slowing is about 80% of what soldiers in the field do. Women need to be able to perform at least at the standard of combat effectiveness as the minimum requirements for men or they simply are inadequate to be soldiers. The bottom line is that these changes are almost entirely political, whether people want to admit it or not. It's so we can say we're inclusive, meanwhile we s…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:38 AM
4

If it even happened. When feminists get into a girl-power kick they're happy to make up stories about how they kicked some guy's ass when in reality there's a 90% chance that no physical altercation occurred at all.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 12:58 AM
1

You are dodging the question though. You're refusing to acknowledge the basic reality that the mens teams are consistently more successful at constructing shelters, gathering food, and coordinating leadership, while the female teams struggle commonly and achieve at best sub-par performance. I know you desperately want to square this circle but you're living in an insulated bubble and using half-assed assessment of the situation to justify what you believe is adequate performance because you woul…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 06:03 AM
1

You can keep dodging the question, that's totally fine with me, it doesn't change the fact that women and men have vastly different natural skillsets, teamwork and leadership abilities are among the things that men are just better at than women, not to mention physical strength and constitution.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:56 PM
1

Ok well agreeing to disagree on that, do you not notice how the dynamic between the men's tribe and the women's tribe differs? If you could entertain me; how would you describe them?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:58 PM
1

You can deny it all you want but the footage speaks for itself. Now sure it's possible to contend that this is reality TV and the desire to write an interesting narrative can lead to bending the truth, but given the over-eagerness for western television to sell the girl-power angle, it's hard not to feel as if the most obvious answer is correct here; women are by and large notoriously bad at working together in groups for tasks like these. I love the women in my life but fuck us all if we went c…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:13 PM
1

Well martial arts is sort of a nebulous craft that doesn't translate like other sports do in many ways; martial arts is for many firstly intended as a means of self-defense, of which there are philosophically not boundaries placed such as ones sex. Training someone to be ready to kill someone else to stay alive doesn't really know sex, and so it is taught without considering that. When it comes to competition they absolutely do separate the sexes due to a desire for competitiveness because yes, …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:02 PM
1

But my point is that the average female black-belt is more exceptional than the average 13 year old boy black-belt, so by that the 13 year old boy would struggle to achieve the same results. It wouldn't be overstating women's performance to say a woman could and a 13 year old boy couldn't if you didn't accept your premise, which I don't. You don't contend this is true, which I can only assume is because you don't fully understand what these women are truly capable of doing. Second, the top 1% of…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:47 PM
1

You're missing the point though; you said you found it hard to believe there were female black-belts in gyms kicking men's asses if they weren't using PED's, but the average man is not nearly as impressive at fighting than the more exceptional women. Sure, it's probably like the top 10th percentile of women fighting the 50th percentile of men, but that means we'd be talking about 1 in 10 women being able to kick the shit out of 5 in 10 men, and that's probably even being nice about it; if we sta…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:20 PM
1

To put this in context; do you think the most athletic and fastidiously trained 13 year old boy trained in martial arts could beat Olympic level female athletes? And if you do, then what experience leads you to believe this is so?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:03 PM
1

The fastest women's 100m time is 10.49 seconds, that's good enough to get 3rd place in the Rio 2016 Decathalon in the men's competition for the 100m event, so how is that woman's athletic ability on par with a 13 year old boy? It's not white-knighting to acknowledge reality, and there are a lot of women out there who can kick the shit out of your average man. Again I'm curious have you done much fighting yourself? Because to so vehemently deny even women's potential abilities in fight sports spe…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:58 PM
1

Mixing the tribes isn't the point, it's that the women's only team was completely incompetent and were so unsuccessful that they rushed the process prematurely because it was going to get out of hand. There are other 'women v. men' seasons of survivor in various countries with similar results where the women have a much harder time working together and establishing leadership as well as appropriating tasks. You're acting like this concept that women-only groups struggle in these kinds of situati…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:44 PM
1

Many of these women do have decent conditioning though, have you ever sparred with a woman who was competent and in decent shape? Also, well landed strikes performed with good form will fuck you up even from a much smaller opponent. Although you indicated you are 6' 4" previously if I recall, most men are short enough to get kicked in the head, and a woman who knows how to headkick properly could knock out the average man with one shot if he wasn't able to block it or move properly to make it gl…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:37 PM
1

Ok admittedly when I said they were all going to die I'm speaking in hyperbole but they were stealing food from eachother and hadn't built a shelter and were not working together as where the men were far more successful, so they quickly mixed the teams up because it was obviously a balance issue. It's no bullshit here's a link to it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=118&v=tqfAt7TshLw The fact that you just presume it's a lie because it pisses on your preconceived notion of the world …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:26 PM
1

Do you fight or practice martial arts?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:25 AM
1

Technique significantly aids in a fight especially against someone who doesn't have a clue what they are doing and a reasonably trained woman could likely hold her own against an average man if he lacks training, but the skill curve starts off steep and levels off fast; it doesn't take a lot of time or work to learn enough to be useful in a fight, but it takes a lot more time and work to get better from there, and the higher up you go the more work it takes still.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:22 AM
2

subtle psychological manipulation leading someone to question their own sanity.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:12 AM
52

It happens, but I don't think it's nearly as common as some people would paint it to be. For sure some people get unlucky and get bothered a lot, but this is usually an exception and not the rule. My girlfriend of 7 years for instance has only been cat-called like once or twice in her life that she can remember, and yet I have walked down the street and been yelled at by men and women alike saying all sorts of shit from threats of violence to empty sexual comments. Insecure people blow this shit…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:01 AM
1

No they try to do the work but usually what happens is the girls waste a lot of time trying to decide who is a leader and what they should do that they become painfully inefficient. There is a season of Survivor where they start as Men versus Women and the Women's tribe melts apart and so they had to do the merge early because the women were going to all die since they were so bad at executing plans. They tried hard, they just couldn't coordinate anything meaningful.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 10:48 AM
1

I think the fixation on the Lord of the Flies as a narrative about masculinity being toxic inherently misses how much the book focuses on the role of anarchy and the lack of positive authority figures resulting in chaos and the breakdown of the social order. By that I disagree that it wouldn't make sense with females; when girls don't have positive authority figures keeping them in check they can become as bitter and nasty as boys ever could, and given women's generally superior ability to socia…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 10:42 AM
1

Given that the vast majority of people probably have some kind of medical condition; if Christmas sweater logos not handling your unique disposition sensitively causes you anxiety, you either have your priorities fucked up massively, or you have an amazing life.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:54 PM
1

Given that the vast majority of people probably have some kind of medical condition; if Christmas sweater logos not handling your unique disposition sensitively causes you anxiety, you either have your priorities fucked up massively, or you have an amazing life.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:53 PM
1

Given that the vast majority of people probably have some kind of medical condition; if Christmas sweater logos not handling your unique disposition sensitively causes you anxiety, you either have your priorities fucked up massively, or you have an amazing life.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:53 PM
1

Given that the vast majority of people probably have some kind of medical condition; if Christmas sweater logos not handling your unique disposition sensitively causes you anxiety, you either have your priorities fucked up massively, or you have an amazing life.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:53 PM
1

Yeah you did, you said only 2 fields, and then when pointed out that dozens of fields do, you are lumping them all into 1 category so that it remains as 2, even though it's a lot more, and beyond that it's far more than 2 fields even if we fallaciously call engineering a single STEM field, as pointed out Environmental scientists, geoscientists, chemists, physicists, astronomers, and many more are male dominated. That notwithstanding that 3/4 of STEM employees in the US are men, but that's parity…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 05:24 AM
1

Yeah, your source is garbage, that's 100% not true that there is parity in all but 2 fields, those being CS and engineering(which comprises of dozens of disciplines), you're moving goalposts and you're still wrong. I really don't have anything else to say on that matter, you're just plain wrong. http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf - it's a few years old, but it's solid stats directly from the source. As for the percentile, yes it has a lot of meaning. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 03:09 AM
1

Ok, first off engineering is a huge range of disciplines, so summing up engineering as 1 is bullshitty. I'm a Chemical Engineer, less than 20% of us are women, and that goes pretty commonly across all kinds of disciplines not all of them are engineering, such as chemists (39% women), environmental and geoscientists (28% women) and the list goes on. Estimated 24% of all STEM jobs in the US are held by women, and women are hired at a higher rate than men per capita, so you are just straight up wro…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 02:18 AM
3

I didn't say that women don't have skill sets to bring to STEM, I said that men and women's brains being different, men possess on average more desirable attributes for STEM, and therefor are advantaged naturally in technical disciplines. That's why despite all the well wishes, quotas, scholarships and affirmative action, women still are significantly smaller contributors overall in STEM fields than men. It's like every time someone says "men are better than women at X" the only thing y'all hear…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 09:25 AM
3

There are a myriad of differences in male and female brains which commonly result in different skillsets; one example is that men are much better at systemising than women, which is a huge advantage in STEM fields. To say they're less suited is more to say that on average, men are better performers, and that at a much higher percentile women are capable of success in STEM where as for men, it's a much lower percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 05:59 AM
1

Honest reality is that fear of rejection is one of the biggest barriers for most men, it keeps them from gaining confidence mainly because it stops them from ever interacting with girls. Just keep your cool and prepare for it because it's always a real possibility, and it's never as bad as you think, especially if you go in with that mindset. At 16, getting rejected by a girl and having your schoolmates shit-talk behind your back is empty; at least you have the balls to put yourself out there an…
/r/seduction30/05/17 10:21 AM
1

It's not about if they will make a move in that time, it's that you see they express no significant interest, and if so, you either test the waters or you move on.
/r/seduction30/05/17 10:14 AM
1

You're mixing the exceptions with the rule. Even if the 99.99999% figure is hyperbole, even if it's 90%, that means 9 out of 10 times you will spend 6 months to a year or more with your dick in your hand and nothing to show for it. So 5-10 years of nothing for a shot at a girl who by chance ends up being into you after knowing her for 6 months, and no real experience gained because you waited around like an idiot.
/r/seduction30/05/17 10:02 AM
1

No it doesn't it means you need to go back to the drawing board and re-assess the field before coming back and trying again. That or look elsewhere besides your school for girls, for example, join track and talk to girls from other schools at meets, or something like that.
/r/seduction30/05/17 09:56 AM
3

My take on a basic way to become more confident in terms of self-perception is to focus on improving the insecurities you posses in talking and interacting with people you perceive to be out of your league. Specifically, what makes you feel like you're inferior to them? If it's your body for instance, work out and focus on improving not just your appearance but overall athleticism and strength. When you become better at physical feats, you feel better, and that feeling feeds directly into your s…
/r/seduction30/05/17 08:09 AM
2

If she didn't talk to you at this party and hasn't kept in touch with you since, it seems doubtful that she's interested. If you already have an established form of communication like a social media account or email you talk through or something like that you could contact her and arrange to hang out, but it sounds like it would be out of the blue which might make it weird. Otherwise it's probably best to just move on, those kinds of feelings are natural but they usually go away if you ignore th…
/r/seduction30/05/17 07:28 AM
1

Study human anatomy. Reading medical textbooks will just familiarize you with everything and you get used to reading and talking about things as a matter-of-fact. In time it will feel less awkward, and then from there just move onward with more casual knowledge and conversation about sex. If you have close friends who are confident and knowledgeable and won't give you shit, feel free to just ask them questions as well. The major caveat to this is to not let the entire thing become academic for y…
/r/seduction30/05/17 05:23 AM
1

I sensed sarcasm, that's my guess.
/r/seduction30/05/17 03:28 AM
2

Methinks he doth protest too much.
/r/seduction30/05/17 03:27 AM
1

Ok so disagreeing with your obtuse take on the situation automatically makes me a feminist. By that assessment nearly all of the people in this subreddit are probably going to reveal themselves to be feminists if you talk to them long enough, so I guess we're all boned.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 12:58 PM
43

Honestly, this is the sort of horseshit that makes me seriously consider getting a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:27 PM
1

The idea that men are the sole providers for their wives and children is basically the reason alimony is the way it is today, as well as the general social custom that dictates that men are expected to pay for almost everything.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:57 PM
1

Some of them are pro-porn, some aren't. Pornography is actually a very polarizing issue among feminists that I've seen.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:19 PM
2

The idea that overly strict gender roles create dangerous social norms for both men and women for instance. I also agree with feminism's general stance on the importance of the right to legal abortions, those are just a couple off the top of my head. Obviously Feminism is a disjointed blob of differing ideologies, some of which are partially ok, and some of which are utter garbage.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:10 PM
2

It's because they're too shortsighted, not because they're right.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:20 AM
1

Certainly do, although I'll admit I've not been a victim of some of the more serious hardships facing men, but I have friends of all stripes who have experienced problems on account of their gender, and it makes me sympathetic mostly for that reason.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:08 AM
1

Not really.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:02 AM
4

People who lie center are the hearts and minds you have to win to cultivate more support and achieve the goal of a more equal and free society for men. If you view every single person who dons that label mindlessly as your enemy with absolutely no capacity for being shown a better way, then they will just remain that way, and you will face a much longer and more grueling road. Those people on the fringe of feminism are capable of reformation, and that's the point of this entire post; feminists a…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:01 AM
1

Wouldn't call myself one, no.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:53 AM
6

You could sidestep 90% of the bullshit in accomplishing your goals by calculating your actions, but instead you'd rather run in head first and call people like me a pussy, and declare all people who wear the Feminist label your enemy. Well congrats, you're doing the same silly shit they do, how do you feel?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:50 AM
1

Ok, I'm also that guy in the middle to be honest, and I've engaged with both in a neutral position. Overwhelmingly, my experience has been that MRA's bring a much better debate game than the Feminists. Sure there are people on both teams who need to practice debate, but it's fairly one-sided.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:35 AM
2

Feminism still has things they could fight for which are noble, to pretend that there's absolutely nothing I think is inaccurate. Obviously elaborating on them here is probably not the spirit of the sub but women still face issues. Granted I think men's issues get significantly less time of day and are far more readily dismissed but it's not a zero-sum game, in a better world both would matter.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:18 AM
3

I have no desire to 'save' Feminism in any explicit sense, I came to comment on how it is amusing that Feminists often deploy such self-destructive behavior and reach out as an expression to those who also find themselves in a centrist position and pushed out by Feminists. However, the reality is that were the MRM capable of moving Feminism's base to a more center position, this would significantly improve the ability of the MRM to educate others and spread its message to seek social improvement…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:33 AM
6

No it isn't, the sole purpose of the MRM is to promote issues facing men and boys in western society, it has no explicit desire to destroy Feminism it's just that the two are obviously at an impasse on many topics.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:26 AM
5

They've diversified by co-opting other civil rights movements, but as for size in the US almost 3/4 of Americans don't self-identify as feminist, and some metrics show that this may even be shrinking. The problem though is that if they actually believed what they say they do then they wouldn't have to alienate a large block of the cis, hetero, white crowd, along with all the people they leave in the dust due to infighting like trans, both men and women, who are seen as either infiltrators or gen…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:38 AM
3

The thing is, I think if Feminism were to actually do this, it would change the face of Feminism to become a movement actually seeking to do the thing it often says it wants to do. It just so happens that it doesn't do this, and so people begin to see that the emperor has no clothes.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:27 AM
3

I'm not usually a big fan of the internet for these more polar debates for that very reason, however having witnessed strangers in real life having debates, feminists commonly spend a lot of the time in the argument just repeating loudly that the other doesn't know what they're talking about when they present evidence, even when they clearly demonstrate they do. Perhaps it's not a universal thing, but your average even-footed debate between an MRA and a Feminist in my experience sees the MRA tro…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:19 AM
2

I wouldn't consider this unique to feminism for certain, but in my experience I find that the MRA side is far less likely to be extreme in these views than the Feminist side is. Specifically, the MRM is basically a reaction to Feminism's domination of the popular culture; the idea that men were essentially without a voice was seen as a product of seeking parity for women according to Feminism. Men don't need a voice in this discussion, Men have it all, remember? Essentially, the Feminists litera…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:09 AM
14

I know some more moderate Feminists who are for equality and a lot of them do identify with men's issues, however their adherence to Feminist principals such as Patriarchy Theory make a lot of their ideas feel rather patronizing. Particularly, the idea that men's problems are a result of men's clumsy attempt to oppress women, and that these issues will go away if women ever achieve true parity in all major forms. Stranger than this, I've leveled this idea about feminists being ostracizing direct…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:57 AM
9

...wait a minute...
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:40 AM
1

It is hypocritical but to be honest I see it as more egotistical. They agree to let men say something for a change, and then the moment he does, they can't not immediately point out all of women's issues as if accepting that both have issues is some kind of conceit.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:11 AM
2

I agree that we need to embrace our differences and not deny they exist, however I am a big fan of people going their own way, and so I personally don't care if people want to craft their own destiny as long as they have a net contribution to society. Be whatever you want to be as long as you're good at it I say.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:11 PM
3

Eh, that depends on who you ask. Sure some people are less happy, but I think gender roles being too restrictive can certainly have negative consequences in a modern society. However the idea that it wasn't originally a product of necessity is ahistorical; simply put, when you're fighting jaguars, pregnant women need to stand behind the men.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:04 PM
12

It might be appropriate to point out that the traditional gender roles didn't result in harmony or prosperity, they just resulted in a species that didn't starve to death or get killed by the other civilization. It wasn't a happy place, it was a shitty mess most of the time, like the world is now and has always been.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:14 AM
3

Oh I totally agree there are radfems who straight up hate men and are literally evil and full of shit, but those tend to be the minority of shrieking harpies and not the average person who just casually thinks that "men have it better than women generally because I was taught this in grade-school and everyone keeps repeating it," which is the kind of feminist I most commonly interact with. edit: swapped men and women, fixed.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:58 AM
3

Because their mind is being poisoned with misinformation? I don't know how many feminists you've had real life talks with, the internet is not always the best place for this because it often turns into a shouting match for likes/upvotes/whatever, but most women and self-described feminists in my experience aren't consciously malevolent towards men. I'm not sure how many women you know personally who aren't self-identified with the MRA or are not at least sympathetic to it, but do you find these …
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:49 AM
2

Again, I think this sort of view where equality of outcome is the goal comes from a distortion of reality. I know a lot of feminists and almost all of them are very well meaning people who desire equality. The disconnect is because their worldview comes from a gynocentric one where Patriarchy invisibly causes the majority of life's problems, and it makes them say and do shit that they don't even realize is awful and anti-equality. Their heart is there, their brain is not.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:30 AM
10

I do legitimately think most feminists want to foster equality and make things better for everyone, they just view the world through a feminist lens, and so their sense of reality is heavily distorted.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:11 AM
16

Except half the time they don't even do that. Men who are told by feminists they can express themselves and talk about their problems and the moment they do they drop the "masculinity so fragile" shit on them.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:09 AM
7

By the logic, men whose background cycles consist of almost exclusively lingerie and bikini models and cars are very pro-women, not a single man on that background loop. Bastards!
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter