TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beema Archive

View 3 posts and 121 comments by beema on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And then all the 9-year old boys being flown around the world by their moms so that famous and powerful men could dote on them to make their dreams come true realized that it was all, just... privilege. /Scene.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:23 PM
1

You're right. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:38 PM

Working against anger requires anger. What are you talking about? Edit: The patient amongst you will be glad to realize I have realized the error in my ways.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:45 AM
4

The reverse joking thing is all that I'm really bothered by; I love to split chores by task, and will gladly bring in one load of groceries for my hypothetical fiancee to put away for us. However, if you assumed either and reprimanded me for not following your implicit plan, then I would have a problem.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:44 AM
3

Dick.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:37 AM
0

Honestly, I find that only comes up as a response to people talking about "rape culture" and "rape jokes" more generally (about women), and I agree that it does mean people will stop complaining about (good) jokes about prison rape.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:37 AM
1

EXACTLY!
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:36 AM
3

Women, or pregnant women? And, where do you think women get HIV?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:32 AM
-2

Technically a mistrial then, if verdict was reached based upon facts not in evidence.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 10:30 PM
1

Girl, you don't know what it's like to be a man.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:30 AM
1

Plastic surgery - problem solved. Try getting ahead and being ugly, that is not easy.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:26 AM
1

Hmmmm.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:32 AM
1

Exactly?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:13 AM
5

I want to see the internally discussed "why"...
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:44 PM
2

Oh?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:41 PM
-21

So, you support feminism as much as "free speech" supports mens' rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:41 PM
1

Well, say a tragic accident happens, one of your children is killed, and while the cause is truly a mystery, you blame your neighbor, whom you've been feuding with for years. The cops investigate and find that evidence is inconclusive, but it goes to trial anyway, I mean the whole town knows of the feud and all, and since the neighbor doesn't have a good alibi (he was home at the time, say), and doesn't have evidence of who it was, or that it wasn't him, he gets convicted and sentenced to 10-15 …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:38 PM
1

Well that's a case-in-point on the issue if I've ever read one...
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:31 PM
1

Honestly (doubling the cost of every case the police investigate) doesn't sound that rational because I don't think we do that for most crimes. But, you say that we do, and I think it does sound reasonable for people to double check in the case of fires and theft, etc., but, is that really the case? Two detectives, one looking each way, are assigned to every case wherein there could be fraud or false blame? Anyway, I think it's a strong case to say that we have a precedent set by other criminal …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:31 PM
3

Yep, it's what put the final schism into the community that is Feminism - those who supported it were shocked at the outright protests by their (apparent) peers. Hm, I guess that was the official birth of the Trad-Fem meme? Interesting.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:27 PM
2

Died with the ERA, as far as I know... Note that the ERA is reintroduced every year, though...
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:26 AM
1

As far as I can tell... there's not much incentive to "fess up" once a trial or police procedure is under way, so increasing the penalties for being found out would not have an effect on those in this situation. The incentives to maintain a lie already far outweigh the incentives to "fess up", and so we would not expect to see an increase in false accusations by an increase in false accusation penalties. Also, it seems to me that the best way to handle this problem would be to respect the preced…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:21 AM
1

Whine it out man. Seriously, do whatever you gotta do and call it what you gotta call it. Point is, man, get it out, and let it out, over and over... until it's gone. We're here for you. Be strong* by your own definition. *If you want to; sometimes I feel best feeling "weak" about something... but these words really are bullshit categories.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:14 AM
14

Only [female] feels are reals. FTFY /s
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:03 AM
3

Just start answering "Yes" to those 'rhetorical' questions your opponent is asking -- "YES, men are told if they get beaten it is because they made a woman angry -- it's the first response, what did he do?" Or, "Yes, men are generally victim-blamed for being drunk/drugged and raped, or the like." Or, "Yes, men who are victims of rape from a woman have been forced to pay child support to her child... pretty good allegory towards making a woman carry a rape baby to term." And end with this "Do men…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:02 AM
-2

Luckily, her mind is blown, too.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:13 AM
1

Thank you for that story, it's nice to hear.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 01:31 AM
0

Hm, while I agree with you, she is a victim of conditioning; obviously she was wrong, shit got fucked up, and she was conditioned wrongly.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:52 AM
1

I whole-heartledly agree with you, but I also posted a comment furthering the logic of the comment in question. Weird.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:49 AM
1

Additionally, relationship after relationship can allow this personality-evolution to occur in discrete chunks.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:48 AM
2

I dunno, I think she is a MRA: ...the fact is, most men don't beat, rape, or resent raising their children... Oops.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:42 AM
1

Not "no proof", just no "admissable evidence" on the matter because it wasn't precisely related to her case, as seen by the court at the time.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:23 AM
1

To me it's frustrating because I can see that it's true. Equally frustrating, though, is seeing men trick women into thinking they "just want friendship".
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:36 AM
1

You did great, as others have said. If you still feel a need to express yourself, just say how you felt, and why.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:32 AM
1

Well who gives a shit what they think, do you want them to be enemies to you?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:19 AM

Talk nicely. They are not enemies.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:30 AM
0

Well, first of all, don't emasculate him with your description. He's making a choice, a bad one (I think), but a choice nonetheless, to stay in the relationship for now. Investigate why he might want to wait; what's he really getting out of this? Maybe this kind of discussion will help him see this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:00 AM
1

50 shades of grey. Anecdotal evidence from many women I have known. What does "dominant" not cover?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:03 AM
3

If you didn't back it all up with fact, you don't really have a leg to stand on. Essays need citations. Now if she didn't hold others to this standard, that is unfair, but she might have. Cite your sources and get your shit together.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:10 AM
1

Interestingly, you've hit upon a kind of sexism, I think: people don't seem to be taking these women seriously, I mean, they wouldn't mean it right? /s OR, society is actually getting more fucked up, and people really just don't know what to say in response to that because we seem to think that whatever reaction someone has to an emotion is legitimate, even if it is a genocidal impulse. Since this mental construct exists, and since people take for granted that 'the patriarchy' holds down women, …
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:17 AM

You are not a pervert. :) (At least I have no reason to believe you are).
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:13 AM

Or, yknow, if the person in the relationship feels it's right to leave...
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:11 AM

Mmmmmmm, there's a lot of examples in society of men being dominant and women being sexually aroused by it; the point of the add this this car will control you and leave you wanting more, like a powerful master (or mistress) or seduction.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:08 AM
1

Well, that's dumb, I feel like we've been over this a lot today on this subreddit, but this is a simple Apex Fallacy. The further you go back in time, the less well-off most people were, so to assume you'd have "an okay time" in a time-machine is just a preposterous stretch of the imagination. As a white male, I'd not like to back in time to the days of Feudal lords and peasants, unless the time-machine has a "make me king" button. But really, even that might suck in reality.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:00 AM
1

I'd just like to extrapolate on this quote: ...when someone feels as though they are constantly being watched, judged and laughed at or called after, it can have an important effect on our level of comfort and confidence at our school. I feel that way due to my race and gender. I am a white male. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:43 AM

But 'hens' are female, no?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:35 AM
1

That's right, case in point, my generalization was not entirely helpful. Anyway, I guess we just agree, except it's "ads". ;)
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:49 AM
1

Yea, and women shack up with poor dudes who beat them; so what?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:48 AM

While I understand what you are saying, speaking in such generalities doesn't really move the dialogue forward.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:35 AM

In a sense, yes. Men are looking for women who make them feel safe emotionally, and personally. In effect, both sexes want to be "cared for" by the other, and I think this is very close to "protection" in concept, though clearly as you used the word "protection" it is a much more specific idea, and in this specific form it is an example of the type of care most women want to receive in our society (apparently).
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:30 AM

That's dumb, men most certainly only shack up with women who 'make them feel safe', society just doesn't see it that way; we use different words to describe what is fundamentally the same thing for each gender.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:16 AM
2

Yea, it is.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:16 PM
2

Granted, nothing is free or without cost; whether women choose to be cognizant of it or not, the choice to exploit male sexuality will always have natural consequences.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:43 PM

Male disposability.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:35 PM

That's very different, you are claiming that most hostesses are not good at what they do?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:34 PM

Hot hostess as slut? No. You are actually just wrong.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:22 PM
1

I think that's it, or at least when the aspect that is a 'performance' is separated from biological function, as the 'performance' of female companions is generally seen.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:21 PM
0

Dude, you're great.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:22 PM
0

You try to dodge this issue by generalizing about men, AND women. Please, stop that, although I am with you in spirit.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:22 PM
2

If you are leaving, the relationship is gone. So it's not a question of valuing one more than the other, just the acknowledgment that if you leave him (the relationship is gone), he wants to keep his money. Now, if you feel this framework of a trade-off is legitimate, your actions indicate that you value his money more than the relationship. Now I know that's probably not true, but it's also probably not true that he values his money more than the relationship. I say you sign the prenup and get …
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:51 PM

If you feel this conversation is a waste of time (compared to removing trolls and objectification), feel free to switch gears, but I am finding it useful. Can you give me a bit more on the distinction between sexual objectification and the appreciation of a person (as sexual)? I ask because this does seem a legitimate distinction, and is one that I would like to better understand so that I may apply it to situations where the expression of sexual appreciation from one group is viewed as objectif…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:48 PM

Gotcha. That's a fine line, though, how do you feel about people sexualizing cosplayers? This seems to me on par with most of the sexualization of non-models that goes on in r/ladyboners.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:21 PM

No, no, I read that. I was just wanting to clarify where the 'negativity' was coming from in your mind, as it seemed some of that was coming from people who arrived at the post to troll it. I felt my question was still unanswered, and thus I asked it. I'd be interested in your definition of sex positiveness, basically.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:43 PM

Is it sex positive to do anything to anyone without their consent?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:40 AM

Don't disparage hallucinogens like that.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 10:20 PM
3

The same (majority for non-violent offenses) is true of men...
/r/MensRights23/10/12 10:20 PM
10

Dude............... I hope my absurd amount of periods demonstrates the deep truth I saw in your statement. Woah.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:05 PM
1

True... but they have also been brought up to understand that racism is a 'special kind' of discrimination, and so treatment of men cannot be comparable.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:49 PM
2

I would say that men face social issues around gender-stereotyping, and though some men are 'too feminine', or something, my personal view is that masculinity itself is increasingly seen as a 'bad'.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:45 PM

It's better to fight them in the land of principles and narratives, which you can still use to win this argument. But yes, your time is valuable, don't waste it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:44 AM

Yea I'm with you that it makes me angry, superficially, but I don't think that's a good approach.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:14 AM
0

Well yea you never know.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:52 PM
3

Yes, yes, yes! I almost quoted that part directly, about "[our] appearance" needing to conform to "[their] biases". Holy shit!
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:51 PM

I would disagree only in that the message may be other things depending on what the kids think already, but, that this makes you more right because the kids will get all kinds of weird lessons from this.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:57 PM
1

No it would make you kinda dumb because this girl is seemingly after consensual sex.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:55 PM
7

The difference in trauma is due to social conditioning. Women also have innate sexual responses, sometimes aroused during the rape, and many women have psychological issues revolving around that fact due to the fact that it conflicts with their conditioning. Basically you are saying that some men "just sit back and enjoy it", and that that should be acknowledged. Okay, but do we also acknowledge that some women also accept rape and aren't that bent out of shape about it? Why does it matter that …
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:39 PM
1

I agree about self-regulation, let's help society by becoming role-models of enlightened social interactions (I can't think of a word to describe the lack of presumption and loss of baggage, but there it is).
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:30 PM
1

He might not have seemed like a jerk, he should try it. Now, what's the overall principle we can apply here? That everyone has agency, and should behave as they see fit; within that, it is fine to tolerate dancing, or to push someone away, depending on what the person in question (the one making the choice) wants to do, and that's that.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:01 PM
1

Honestly, I would tell you to get over it, as the issue resides within you (you don't know how she intended it, or what she was even thinking). I would say the same to a woman in an identical situation.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:57 PM
-2

Holy shit you are probably right.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:53 PM

In a man's body? I say go for it.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:52 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:40 PM
3

Did you actually figure this out, or read it somewhere? :P
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:38 PM
1

This is the best response, here.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:37 PM
2

I'd like to point out that the first paragraph is scientifically invalid. He said the difference may be genetic, but then referenced a "decline" in performance. This implies selection has occurred during the period, to explain the decline in male performance from a genetic perspective. However, if the information age rewards people who mature early, are verbally and socially sophisticated, and control their impulses, AND, as Brooks speculates, genetics explains the decline in male performance, s…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:49 PM
1

Well, let him know society doesn't agree with his logic when applied to rape... I'd paraphrase his logic as: Men are anatomically built for taking hits, and women are not, therefore it's more immoral to hit women than to hit men.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:20 PM
1

People are focused on the ratio of men to women; that's not the issue which most affects profits. The real issue, I think, is that the price differential attracts a different kind of customer, the men who attend are willing to pay more, and have no qualms about sexism, they are, largely, douchebags. The girls who show up are likely more of a mixed bag. Douchebags will hit on girls and buy them drinks, not that the girls are actually going to super satisfied by the douches, but the bar will certa…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:36 AM
5

"For the purposes of buying tickets, I identify as a woman."
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:32 AM
3

He does make some dubstep tracks.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:32 AM
26

him.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:30 AM
5

Yes, yes, a thousand times, yes! I couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:28 AM
1

Then why not a quota? And why not have a price scale which accounts for attractiveness?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:25 AM
-40

To be contrarian, he didn't say he didn't like it, just that it was 'bad' that he had to look back on it, which, to be completely honest, sounds like it could be repeated words. Edit: Additionally, his focus on the fact that it was his 'first time', and that was what he would be looking back on as bad, suggests to me it's possible he picked up the verbage / thought process from someone else.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:00 PM
-5

If you can't see how, you are willfully ignorant. Truth is, you don't think it's funny, good work.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:58 PM
5

Came here to say this.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:57 PM
2

Indeed, maybe the REAL story is that school is biased against white males, who the teachers think could be doing 'so much' better than they actually are.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:04 AM
1

That's pretty simplistic, lot's of math seems to involve semi-multi-tasking and allowing the brain to find the solution itself.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:39 AM
2

No she didn't, or at least I don't think that's "real".
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:10 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 12:39 AM
3

They absolutely do.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 09:08 PM
3

Your criticism applies equally well to the idea that CEOs and Senators are thus positioned due to their race rather than accumulated power and wealth.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 09:02 PM
5

Wow, I actually came here to say just about this. I'm glad I'm not the only one. Single standards make sense, but the standard for male adults and female children are not a good start; we quickly jump to the conclusion that some type of rape occurred through our puritan view of teenage girls. We do not have this same puritan view of teenage boys, many of us were once said teenagers, and understand there is no dearth of sexual impetus in the teenage mind. If we didn't moralize sex and think of it…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:58 AM
1

Was the guys own idea to walk barefoot, or was he motivated by his date walking barefoot? False dichotomy; he was motivated by his date, and the specific musculature actions taken to become barefoot were his idea (by definition). He understood the costs and benefits to them both should he let her borrow his shoes or not, it seems he calculated a net benefit for himself by his barefootedness, as he seems to have taken the action. Could his decision be influenced by knowledge of gender stereotypes…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:35 AM
0

Yea, but this reaction is also kind of stupid. Clearly in that picture, the guy was down to walk barefoot. Indeed, one summer I made a point of walking on pavement barefoot and I got pretty good at it, and was surprised how many stores didn't care. Starbucks even, haha. Anyway, the point is, maybe we could solve a lot of this by not searching out offensive opinions and instead putting effort into ideas that actually help everyone live together respectfully. The real problem here would be that pe…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:27 AM
1

Man, you are not adding to the dialogue at all.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:28 AM
5

Doesn't matter; had sex. But no really, c'mon, man, this is a consensual act between adults which was captured on film. Now, we can get into all kinds of specifics, but we know none. As far as I can tell, there's a dude with not-too-cold feet walking home with a girl he likes, and is doing something nice for. Shit, if my male friends wore heels, for whatever reason, I might let them borrow my shoes for a stretch too, heels are uncomfortable, as you well know, it seems, by your title. Are there n…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:27 AM
6

I dunno man, a lot of that sounds pretty unobjectionable, it's shit people of either gender ought to be free of.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:11 PM
1

Well, if you actually read til the end, it's a very interesting conclusion.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:04 PM
1

Oh jesus. This won't end, will it? (I don't want it to)
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:59 AM
0

I stare. I seem to get away with it. Apparently, people who observe others disregarding social mores assume they are powerful. So, guess that all works out.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 05:33 PM
2

Just saying: The story is about how he successfully countersued her, so it makes sense to mention that society doesn't behave as though 'men are utterly fucked'.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 06:03 PM
2

Poorly written. No sources.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:33 PM
4

2 questions. What's wrong with Kucinech? Would you be mad if they had to cover 'male' problems as well? As far as I can think, male health problems are coverable issues.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:41 AM
1

I think in general she isn't necessarily wrong, but I wonder if she would really apply these standards to all people in court, such as not holding past lies against people.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:26 AM
5

I think he's just saying that it's not unique.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 03:51 PM
1

You could find a successful woman and be a house-husband. I don't completely disagree, but I don't think you can simply say that women have it easier based on your perception of their options.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 10:12 PM
1

Well, you don't know what it's like to be, or feel, limited to such an avenue through which to exert force on the world. It might not be as awesome as you think. It's a grass is greener kind of thing, is what I am saying.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 04:47 AM
1

Yes, you should. The reality of modern science education is that it is biased towards the success of women, there are countless programs to get women into science, none exclusively for men, and at the young ages women are exposed to real science, no opportunities of the same kind exist for men. It's not google's fault that more women did better science.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 12:45 AM
1

I don't think you can back up the claim that since women tend to take the 'manipulate husband' route, they are actually better off for it.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 12:34 AM
1

Based on the second half of your title, Dump Her.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 11:48 PM
-1

Man, you guys are still talking about this? Sorry, just kinda surprised. I'd be interested to hear what this guys name was and his take on the situation though, too.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 11:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter