TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beetlejuicer__ Archive

View 50 posts and 655 comments by beetlejuicer__ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
77

Sciencebeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 09:58 PM
27

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 09:15 PM
19

Metabeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:04 AM
16

beetlejuicer__/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 02:52 AM
16

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 08:06 PM
15

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 08:25 PM
15

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 06:58 PM
12

CMVbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 02:43 AM
11

Metabeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 05:41 PM
9

Question For Blue Pillbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:59 PM
9

Question for Redpillbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/19 07:55 PM
9

Debatebeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 09:59 PM
9

beetlejuicer__/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 01:04 AM
9

Question for Allbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 12:17 AM
7

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 08:10 PM
7

Question For Menbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 12:45 AM
6

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 07:48 PM
6

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 11:32 PM
6

Debatebeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:18 AM
5

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/19 02:05 AM
5

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 04:54 AM
4

Question For Allbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 12:38 AM
4

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:32 PM
4

Sciencebeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 06:39 PM
4

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 09:07 PM
3

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 03:39 AM
3

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:57 AM
3

Question for RedPillbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 05:10 PM
3

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 09:22 PM
3

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 04:31 AM
3

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 04:40 PM
3

Question for RedPillbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 02:00 AM
2

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 07:29 PM
2

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:21 AM
2

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 05:56 PM
2

Metabeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 09:52 PM
2

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:44 PM
1

Qestion for RedPillbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 09:35 PM
1

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 08:47 PM
1

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:52 AM
1

Question For Allbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:01 PM
1

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:14 AM
1

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:26 PM
1

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/19 10:21 PM
1

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 05:01 AM
1

Debatebeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:05 PM
0

Discussionbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 09:28 PM
0

CMVbeetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 09:07 PM
0

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:35 PM
0

NYE Purge Post!beetlejuicer__/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 08:14 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I dont understand, what woman want and what other woman say they want, is different, and you say that what other woman say they want is true? And other one false?? Seems like a hidden premise to me Found the study in his vid https://www.kaggle.com/jph84562/the-ugly-truth-of-people-decisions-in-speed-dating/report Reading the study, its so unclear were they asked what they would want in a partner in general? What they would want in a speed dating partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:25 PM
2

Yeah idk why you shit testing me for ideological consistency
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:03 PM
2

Because old folk idioms are exaggerated all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:59 PM
3

Thus the longstanding idiom. You dont believe that those who created it may have exaggerated it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:47 PM
3

How do you determine the mindset in which that idiom was created? Furthermore, why do you assume women had no influence in either the idiom itself, or the bad faith that you think existed when it was created? My comment was speculation as to how it would look like. why do you assume women had no influence in either the idiom itself Your misreading what I meant, I meant that this observation could only really counter the OPs view, if woman were completely responsible for the idioms creation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:35 PM
6

Argument by idiom??? This can only work if the history of that idioms creation had no men holding women in bad faith. (Which I doubt)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:29 PM
7

Do you mean like murdering toddlers after they are born or abortion? If its the latter then thats an interesting debate strategy you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:25 PM
2

I think theres another term for it now, since stockholm syndrom was taken out of the DSM
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 03:07 PM
6

This isnt a contradiction, but more of an interesting caveat. Its that mgtows and mras claim the reasom women under perform in stem is less cultural and more biological. But also say that the reason boys under perform in schools(k-12), is more cultural and less biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 01:55 AM
7

well yeah because hotdogs are sandwiches and hamburgers shops serve all kinds of sandwiches.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 09:53 PM
5

AF\BB = STR\LTR Dual mating was a proposed casual reason, but we don't care what the reason is. Only that women select STR mates differently and treat LTR mates poorly comparatively. This isnt really challenging your claim, but I had rp'ers tell me that AF/BB is the dual mating strategy and that you cannot separate the two. One even told me that the paper supporting it is RP canonical text Is he really at fault for believing that the two concepts describe the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 09:42 PM
1

Oof
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 08:44 PM
8

Patriarchy is simply defined as a society in which men hold more power than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 07:14 PM
1

is a load of fantastical horse shit invented by low-energy MRA and MGTOW. To add on to your point, mgtows, and rps and similar movements, sort of need to construct an insanse view of society, in order to justify the existence of theae movements. By stating that society isnt really like that, you threaten the integrity of those movements.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 04:52 PM
2

An argument could be made that the internet and video games is far more effective at creating "escapism" than all those other mediums. That only under this intense escapism can incels give rise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 06:03 AM
6

edgy contrarian is being an edgy contrarian Idk what is stopping the mods from booting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 05:35 AM
1

This is strange, but I view RP as an ideological framework that is meant to be applied to the world. After applying it, your supposed ruminate about the results. In other words, I view it as a "lens" of sorts. You put them on, and you see what color the world is. Similar to Marxism, Platonism, feminism, and christian-ism . I view it as a neat way to interpret the world, not the world itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 05:07 AM
1

is the op going through something? a bad breakup maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 02:20 AM
2

I made a post about this, but from the other ideological side. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/eikxjw/has_any_rper_actually_read_judith_butler_or/ Typically these claims are usually countered by that they know enough about rp/feminism to dispute them. My suitors have told me that there is a disconnect between the founding literature and the followers of it. others told me that it isnt necessary to know the fundamentals, since you can infer it just from the statements and behav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 01:50 AM
1

its a joke position kinda like anarcho primitivism,
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 10:53 PM
1

I didn't like staying close together with another human being. Don't take this as me implying that the relationship sucked, everything was going great for me and her. But I felt so uncomfortable the whole time and when I dumped her ended our relationship. I think I worded it very poorly because she did not take it well. I had her mom call me the day later asking whether I thought I hated her because she inferred from my breakup that thought I hated her the whole time and couldn't stop crying ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 08:51 PM
1

the dude
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 08:15 PM
2

I think is more poetry than anything else. also holy shit she described one of my past relationships exactly wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 07:50 PM
3

Since nobody said it before. The principle, of opposition to racism and sexism is not the factual claim, that the sexes and races are indistinguishable in every aspect. Rather it is a political and moral commitment to treat people as individuals, as opposed to prejudging them, from the statistics of the group they are a part of.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 07:37 PM
5

I really just picked of his statements at random as my opinion as to whether or not it is true, is irrelevant to my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 01:14 AM
11

Gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8 Truth and hatred arent mutually exclusive concepts. Hatred is defined, as "intense dislike or ill will." Hatred doesn't really exist in a vacuum. People use differing statements as a basis for hatred. The error you made was in assuming that the basis needs to be false, for it to be hatred. When a man cites FBI crime statistics, as justification for why he really dislikes all black people. Does the statistic being true, suddenly mean he doesn't hate black people? Is there a jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 11:53 PM
2

What happened to mr smoogs?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 09:15 PM
2

If Lefties get worked up if there isnt a gay/female character in a piece a media. And righties get worked up if there is a gay/female character in a piece of media. Is there a way to please both?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 06:49 PM
11

Im 18, male, and blue. My age might raise some eyebrows but, at the very least, I dont identify myself as an idealist. I never saw the connection between bp and idealism. A year ago I was still in high school, and I knew mgtow existed, but I never heard of "red pill" until the last five months. I did a little bit of reading the trp sidebar, and the rational male. I thought it read like garbage and didnt describe human intersexual relations all that well. More importantly I thought that you have …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 06:45 AM
5

No I think its that they dont make the connection between, whether these sexless men are "average"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:55 AM
7

here comes a bunch of dudes citing sexlessness statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:40 AM
1

are you alive?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 12:32 AM
2

God I sound like a child for saying this but, I dont know. Whenever I think about questions like these, I only find myself wanting vague generalities. "I want a girl that makes me happy". The meaning in that statement is in defining what makes me happy. But I cant really define what makes me happy beyond superficial things, like video games, good food, and working out. For the past year, ive been at a state of acedia which is defined as a state of listlessness or torpor, of not caring or not bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 08:08 PM
2

Just because feminists, pink pills and other rivals to the red pill community took one of the concepts TRP uses to name their community it does not make the red pill definition wrong I dont think I implied such notions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 04:03 AM
7

Its called nofap
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 11:05 PM
0

Do all women like rough sex? No. Do many, many women like rough sex? Yes. This is something you can solve with statistical data, and not using anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 08:34 PM
2

I have a sneaking suspicion that their marriage was not exactly ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 08:07 PM
1

Usually if you make like an affirmative claim, you have to flair it as a CMV. here is the thread on how flairs work. https://www.reddit.com//r/PurplePillDebate/wiki/flair Usually posts with affirmative claims are removed, unless they are flaired as a CMV. These posts are the least strictly moderated. Discussion posts should be relevant to both RP and BP users. The Discussion flair is appropriate for the following kinds of posts: General questions to the community. Casual or off-topic discussion.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 07:21 PM
1

uhhh why is a thread with an affirmative title being flaired as a discussion and not a CMV?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 07:12 PM
4

Why is the one thing a problem while the other isn't? Because reddit is left leaning. Or to be more specific, reddit is liberal. They dont like any right leaning subs. Its as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 05:01 PM
3

Subs and forums that encourage men to live their best lives are however constantly being banned, speakers are being deplatformed This is an a elementary observation of what is actually happening. Many of the subs/forums arent being banned because they advertise male improvement. They are being banned because they are right leaning. It is also evident by the fact that there are many male improvement subs who are not at risk of being banned because they are left leaning. These subs are, Male fashi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 04:56 PM
5

Most men are not trying to be Alpha, or Beta, but survive in an anti-male, anti-industry, anti-energy world run by left-wing ideological socialists. Most men are trying to keep the jobs they have, not piss off any angry feminists, and maybe eek out a shred of happiness in this "progressive brave new world". Jesus didnt you terps complain that feminists use a bunch of a buzzwords and vague platitudes?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:58 PM
1

No I mean like he solves all the issues in the movie with compassion and understanding, not through conquering.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:48 PM
1

Reddit just banned gamersriseup. Wonder if they will get TRP next.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:26 PM
1

I think he denies becoming red.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 05:32 AM
2

In the past, whenever there was an outbreak, the local smp simply ceased to exist. Up until everything was in the "clear" and the plague was gone. Its pretty obvious really. Fear trumps attraction. A lady might be a perfect 10/10, but if a dude knows she has a contagious deadly virus, he probably wont try to bone her. But I will assume that even with the addition of OLD, the smp will still dissappear if it ever poses a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 02:18 AM
2

Oh no thats from rp, evo psychs dont use the term "money"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 01:51 AM
2

i have no idea why the automod is double commenting on many of my recent posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 12:58 AM
1

i have no idea why the automod is double commenting on many of my recent posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 12:57 AM
1

. other mammal social structures are irrelevant. Im not interested in wish wash definitions of alpha male that are more dependant on generalities rather than fact. I care if the science supports the idea of an alpha male.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 05:24 PM
1

This may interest you https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_myth_of_the_alpha_male To answer no, I dont think humans have an "alpha male". We dont reslly share our social structure with other social animals that have a dominant male. Lions, gorillas, etc. We also dont share traits and behaviors consistent with those species. Such social structures are called dominance hierarchies. Alphas require a dominance hierarchy. Its also strange since our second closest relatives, chimpanzees, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 05:06 PM
4

What kind of a question is that OP. No rational person lives their life, with a want from the opposite sex that is beyond just an ideal dating partner. It is already self evident. If you turned that question to the men on this sub, they can only make fun of it and give sarcastic answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 03:57 AM
3

TLDR: the data was cherry picked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 01:06 AM
2

Thats not a man Edit: Didnt read the tangent lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 12:16 AM
1

That is a week old post idk why you bothered responding
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 11:03 PM
1

If you want to read deeper in to it, then I suggest we interpret the "yikes" and anything similar, not merely as a discombobulated reaction, but as part of a conclusion. also Women CAN be quite manipulative and use their sex as leverage; do you disagree? You have to be kidding if you are asserting this is ALL that the thread is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 09:27 PM
1

Can you taste something without touching it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 05:30 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/f9fc23/dont_feel_guilty_about_manipulating_women_they_do/ Y I K E S I E K K E I S E K I Y Edit: Can I post a discussion thread around that post? It seems worthy of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 06:27 AM
7

This part is wrong. All women prefer muscular men over skinny hipsters. This survey doesn't really support that notion. https://www.livescience.com/5502-men-agree-hot-women.html
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 11:53 PM
2

Op seems to be in direct refutation of black pill. Therefore, one way to properly challenge the op's assertion, one must provide a case for black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 11:21 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/f9buqh/the_female_dating_strategy_sub_inadvertently/ is he just pulling the translations out of his ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 09:14 PM
4

You're judging the op based on a hypothetical of what she would do?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 07:59 PM
8

Honestly whenever a woman does questionable shit, it is easier to take it as a fact of female nature, then to realize that such acts are predicated on the individuals character. Its far less effort to come up with a end all solution to "female nature" than a context dependent one, based on the specific individual. Did you establish any boundaries, or she is breaking them? You might need to have "the talk" with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 06:39 PM
2

or corona virus
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 04:40 AM
12

I fucking love how he juxtaposes Honest man with PPD Woman. Think of the lore implications
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 10:16 PM
2

Is the first How to Train Your Dragon, an example of a feminine hero? and also one the first the examples in animation of a heroic feminine male??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 09:50 PM
3

There are a lot of different definitions of hypergamy, I think the OP means hypergamy as a tendency for either sex to drop their current partner for someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 09:25 PM
4

It is generally true that a mans affair partner is noticeably hotter than his wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 09:17 PM
10

Child rape. Female teachers raping their male students. It’s “inappropriate relationships” and “but he liked it”. Can you show a published feminists saying and or defending this notion? Not some twitter goon whos probably a troll anyways. The media? Can’t call out women committing rape, best to use soft language and cover it up. They call it out all the time. Its news worthy. The media doesnt work on feminist values it works on whatever brings the most outrage and whatever brings ratings. Thats …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 09:13 PM
9

My feels towards it are shared with my feelings towards CEO's and workers of a company. Both being the a sign of progression of a thing. In this case, the things is the intimate relationship between two lovers. At this day and age, marriage seems to the natural progression of a relationship. As "intimacy"(however you want to quantify it) between two parties increases as hits identifiable milestones. The level of intimacy and the number of identifiable milestones is positively correlated . The mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 04:42 AM
2

Long poorly written posts that have the light waft of self help nonsense, belongs at the trp not on ppd.' I mean you go from pointing out the differences between the answers of the two sexes, to mansplaining????
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 04:13 AM
6

Maybe, but the OP's post history certainly is not helping that sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 11:31 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/fbz69f/women_are_not_actually_sexually_attracted_to_men/fj7y11j This is comedy gold Edit: he edited in a /s
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 11:13 PM
4

Usually most hypergamy statistics come from India. Back when it still used a social caste system. The only thing I could find that isnt from india is this old guardians article https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/apr/08/marriage-and-class-study
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 09:51 PM
-1

l o l o o o l o l
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 08:52 PM
3

Honestly I dont get the rp idea that old societies incentives agaisnt hypergamy, look at india and its caste system, it was illegal for woman to marry down a caste.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 08:00 PM
6

There is a very strong correlation though that you can't simply ignore just because it didn't fulfill some high standards of proof you are expecting. There's a very strong correlation of McDonalds, smartphones, video games and online porn. These all increased with the decrease of womans happiness over the past years. If there are other factors at play, why is that stark difference between men and women in this statistic? Is your argument, If feminism caused the decrease in woman's happiness, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:31 AM
0

If you look at the statistics that kept track of happiness over 30+ years period, you will see that the happiness indicators actually DECREASED in this time period for women compared to men. Feminism Correlation=/= causation
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:01 AM
2

Wouldn't that be a valid, but unsound deductive argument? Also isn't this affirming the consequent?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 01:44 AM
9

bell curve distribution for intelligence according to gender. In science it is called the greater male variability hypothesis. Here is a nice meta analysis of the studies around it. https://largescaleassessmentsineducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40536-019-0070-9 It is very interesting, as it found that policies leading to greater female participation in the workforce tended to increase female variability and, therefore, decrease the variability gap. I recommend you read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:56 PM
1

As the earnings gap continues to trend towards a society where women out earn men This is false, and is not a signifying trait of japan, as Japanese men are still out earning Japanese women Japan ranks 19 in the Gender Inequality Index, which for a developed country, is pretty low.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:51 PM
3

I honestly have no idea why RP thinks TBP endorses FDS https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/fayuoq/fds_is_the_only_antidote_to_trp/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:20 PM
4

blue flared users here are sort of... literal I have a sneaking suspicion thats because of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:52 PM
10

where do you live I don't see this at all I can only find like maybe 3 ugly woman at any social event and its because they are friends with stacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:44 PM
1

you need to clarify, I though becky just means an average woman. Do you mean like actually ugly woman? like under a 4?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:42 PM
11

marriage could be each other's friend or even best friend By friends/best friends, I mean actually liking each other, actively listening and engaging with each other, and partaking in activities that they both enjoy. There is no logical contradictions between marriage and such a relationship. So yes. But just to spice up this boring thread, I will bite the bullet and say that this is the ideal marriage, that all married couples should seek to emulate. It is what elevates marriage from a financia…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 08:51 PM
1

Thanos
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 08:35 PM
2

If, according to Kanye West, one good girl is worth a thousand bitches, and if, according to Lil Wayne, bitches come a dime a dozen, does that mean one good girl is worth $8.33? Well, $8.35 in Canada. In Thailand, $8.33 is about 275 Baht. 275 Baht will get you a skanky hooker in a Thai brothel. If you want a really good hooker, it'll cost you at least 2000 Baht, or about $61.00. So in Thailand a good woman is worth $61.00 or $732 a dozen. Yes. However to further this, according to 2Pac Mo' Money…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 07:39 PM
11

never spend your diamonds on a hoe that was the advice I got from minecraft
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 07:37 PM
3

Too bad MRAs can't come up with something like that They literally invented the term. The term toxic masculinity originated in the mythopoetic men's movement of the 1980s and 1990s. It later found wide use in both academic and popular writing. Popular and media discussions in the 2010s have used the term to refer to traditional and stereotypical norms of masculinity and manhood. According to the sociologist Michael Flood, these include "expectations that boys and men must be active, aggressive, …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 07:08 AM
2

https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/2018-05/Ging%2C%20Alphas%2C%20Betas%2C%20and%20Incels%202017.pdf Strange this slipped under the radar
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 07:06 AM
2

However you want to spin it the term "toxic masculinity" is a feminist dog whistle to demonize men and masculinity as a whole Are you trying to pull off one of these yes memes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 06:55 AM
3

It may clear up some misconceptions, but I don't think they will argue in good faith, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 06:35 AM
6

concept of toxic masculinity Here comes a hundred terpers who have no idea what that means going to rant about how toxic masculinity is a evil feminist dog whistle that exist to demonize men. Or complain about how women do it too. (Which doesnt render her point moot)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 06:31 AM
5

Money is kinda of a big deal. Acquiring money requires quite a lot of time and effort. It is quite a portion of your life you have to sacrifice in order to provide money. I actually agree with you on that part. but I don't think wife-husband relationship can really work if one person just provided money and nothing else. I don't think intimate human relationships can be sustained with money alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:38 AM
1

So in this relationship, she also works No she doesn't need to work, in this relationship. What is "rmv My mistake, it was meant to be smp. Which stands for sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:33 AM
4

This is a misrepresentation of what they mean by a mommy wife. I edited my post, but basically its just a one sided relationship. That is the subject of their criticisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:13 AM
4

and not doing anything in return beyond money. That part is essential.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:11 AM
2

edited post. Yeah it was confusing on my part.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:09 AM
6

I think the mommy wife is really a its one sided relationship, where she does everything in a relationship, and he doesn't. could you give me some examples of what you mean by this? I think an example is a man expecting to come home to a hot meal, clean house, ironed shirts and a partner whose ready to “get down to business” whenever the mood strikes him. The kicker that separates this from a normal relationship is that he doesn't do anything in return, or expects to do anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:08 AM
1

I would like to see what meta narratives, the ideologies present on this sub, give to the moniker "men". Or what I am really interested in is the conclusions of such meta narratives. The commentators are merely expressions of a bigger ideology. Nothing more
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 05:00 AM
2

The hidden premise being, that what is one the wikia is merely meant to change the perception of yourself? Not self improvement advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 04:04 AM
5

This is literally on the fds wiki The first thing you see Be a high value woman. A high value woman is a woman who doesn't revolve her life around men. She has her own career, hobbies, and a great social life that fulfills her emotional needs, so if she does welcome a man in her life, he better be amazing. A high value woman also doesn't romanticize men's true nature, therefore she's cautious around them and wants them to prove themselves to her before she gets emotionally attached. Please keep …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:51 AM
1

Can you eat mashed potatoes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 02:25 AM
2

To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 01:29 AM
1

and fake
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 12:46 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/faje8o/dow_falls_1191_points_the_most_in_history/ oh shit
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 06:46 AM
5

oh no, look at divorce rates the fall of civilization is near!! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 06:39 AM
3

smoogs vs anyone lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 04:07 AM
2

Your putting words in my mouth, I don't hold any of those positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 01:43 AM
3

No but in Spanish.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 01:24 AM
2

If I'm socially supposed to sacrifice myself for her to live, then I'm losing my life and her winning her life, by basis of me being shamed into sacrificing for her. So she is competitive in that social contract. That's a non sequitur, how did you go from this If I'm socially supposed to sacrifice myself for her to live, then I'm losing my life and her winning her life, by basis of me being shamed into sacrificing for her to this So she is competitive in that social contract. You still haven't e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 01:09 AM
3

How is it not competitive? It's letting them win and survive by default, that's hardly "fair", and in the spirit of "fairness" and "equality" it's better than they go down with the ship. You still havant explained how that is competitive , you only said "how is it not competitive" You reasoning is obtuse It's letting them win and survive by default, You let them survive, how is that competitive? Adjective: competitive |kum'pe-ti-tiv| Involving competition or competitiveness Also I guess this is …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 12:50 AM
3

Uhh i think thats a leading question in the title on a non cmv post..... Let us count how many minutes until thr mods remove this
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 12:13 AM
1

Other than this Men don't need symbols or definitions or discussions of what is "toxic". We do. We exist. We make our own way. We don't keep up on what beard oil makes us more of a man. I have no idea what the rest of the post even means.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 12:08 AM
3

i watch alot of blacked.com dont remove this mods this is comedy gold
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 07:55 PM
2

10 day old account this dude is a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 12:39 AM
1

chastity, on the other hand, as the permanent and systematic suppression of lust and chastity, as the word is here used, is not a denial of love, but a preparing for it Chastity is permanent until it isnt?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 12:36 AM
2

Thanks. I imagine moderating is like sculpting, you starting from a block of stone and you remove and chip away to create art. Moderators remove and delete parts to create a theme, creating a common good, that is the community.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 12:30 AM
1

I think think when woman are pursing a dude, they think "im finally going to get chad" but idk I dont have a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 12:20 AM
5

. They expect men to comply with the Dual Mating Strategy ????????? In most cases its called cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 10:15 PM
9

Now that I think about it, most men arent even good betas. beta= relationship attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 09:05 PM
169

The duality of man A woman should make a man wait to vet for a good partner but if she make ME wait, then it means she doesn't like me. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 09:01 PM
2

???
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 05:50 PM
5

in the history of humanity Ive never heard that before, can you give a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 10:39 PM
6

But isnt a female being productive and breeding far more helpful to the tribes survival then a female just being a breeding machine? It shows, women didnt just stand there and nurse children, they helped out with the hunting and the gathering http://harpers.org/archive/2015/06/shooting-down-man-the-hunter/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 07:28 PM
3

Productivity and the ability to breed aren't mutually exclusive concepts. Think of it like this, why would natural selection select a unproductive and breed-able female over a productive and breed-able female?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 07:07 PM
2

Look in history almost all great figures and people who advanced humanities' state were dudes, this is the silver lining of females being the "choosers" and getting to reproduce easier, they didn't have "eugenics" applied to them. I think this whole argument rests on the premise that humans are a MCFC(males compete females choose) species. Which I do not think is entirely true. Here is a paper written by evolutionary psychologist explaining why Basically the jist of their argument is that human …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 07:01 PM
4

They can only increase in population if they have the resources to do. (food for raising children) An unproductive female is a dead weight to a tribe. A productive female is still favored by natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:58 PM
8

If they turn out productive, great, but even unproductive females will be provided for and have children. Since you want to talk about eugenics and how it was only applied to males, lets dial back the time scale to hunter gatherer societies. Which tribe would see greater success, the tribe that ends up using up valuable resources to support a unproductive female? or the tribe that kicks them out of the group and or doesn't support them? The point of this question is just to prove that natural se…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:47 PM
13

Any perceived male privilege is in fact an emergent property of female privilege. boy oh boy is that a hot take.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:43 PM
2

u/wtknight can you testify?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:02 PM
5

I was accusing you of fallacy of composition but ok
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:10 AM
6

Did you just cherry pick a list of women and then say that they are representative of all women? Edit: Holy Shit, one of them has a poptropica profile pic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 06:08 AM
2

Nice meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 04:35 AM
3

automod broke
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:47 AM
6

You don't need to be a misogynist to be RP, you can just take the dating advice and leave all the toxic crap behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:42 AM
2

Well I am Schrodinger's pill, I am blue and red and black and pink and dog, at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:40 AM
2

It was a play on this quote https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/294225-only-a-fool-learns-from-his-own-mistakes-the-wise
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 12:06 AM
1

You just edited the comment after I replied to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 12:03 AM
2

Ideally, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:57 PM
3

Ideally, you watch someone else make that mistake and learn from their experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:49 PM
4

Damn I was writing a post, and the guy deleted it. But If you are the dude who posted this thread How do any guys below a 6/10 get dates these days? I recommend that you read this This may be bad form for a debate sub, but I really think you need to hear this. From your post history, you made 6 posts about your depression, and how depressed you are, in the past week. This is a common theme in your posts, which ranges from metal music to foreveralone. It is a consistent theme that you are searchi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:32 PM
21

tch, SAHM's are a upper class thing, if they are poor then reality is that both parents will be working. If you are in a financial position to do it then go for it. Otherwise for most of the population, its a dream arrangement. But its not for everyone, as SAHM's report more anger and depression than working moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 07:15 PM
2

One fairly big driver of sexually dimorphism is parental investment, but all things considered humans are probably in the lower end spectrum of sexual dimorphism in the animal species. This is because human males also help raise infants, which lowers any evolutionary driver for women to be different. I dont really think we have evolved much from the first large society, (I think its mesothelioma). The reason is there's just not enough time. Human evolution takes hundred thousands years. I rememb…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 06:59 PM
3

What is a meme
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 06:20 PM
9

I'm pretty sure woman are more likely to be stalked then men. But that's going off memory. Edit: I think my autocorrect is busted
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 05:29 PM
0

In the process of empathizing with someone it usually works via shared experience and or understanding of their predicament. When an understand is achieved, empathy and pity follows. Yet in experiences whos meaning is entirely subjectively contained to a single being. If I am presented with the goal of empathizing with others, then I am forced to think of an an experience. I had, that is superficially similar and analogous to theirs. When I reach understand via analogy, I feel like I'm missing s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 05:21 PM
14

Incels, transgender, redpill, feminism, mgtow, circumcision, mens rights, One of these is not like the others Edit:he edited out circumcision
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 07:00 AM
13

Browse r/shortcels for a trip
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 06:59 AM
2

I don't thin BP even counts an either an ideology or a "toolset"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 04:24 AM
1

Sí
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 05:29 PM
7

Every girl does those things Have to disagree with you there. Especially on the riding part.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:47 PM
6

What was stopping you from answering with a simple yes or no? I'm 90٪ sure rp'ers cant argue in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:33 PM
7

The man initiates, the man leads, the act of sex is itself an act of a man dominating and penatrating a woman. Have you never had a girl give a good blowjob or ride you or anything like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:29 PM
6

That kind of rp uses terms like female solipsism and says woman lack deductive skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:25 PM
10

I'm fairly certain that literally anything a women does is interpreted as proof for RP. Via post hoc hypothesis. You cant win with these guys
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:10 PM
6

I don't understand, is FDS manipulating men into a LTR? Or is FDS manipulating men in LTR's?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 05:18 AM
10

blue pill virtue signaling Bad faith detected. I seems I failed, and as a result of my failure, you have misunderstood me. What I meant is that women have to pick between either having a career lady or a family, while men can have a career and a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:36 AM
17

It's that men get to have careers and family while woman have to pick one, is what the commenter means. Injecting that women consented to this is neither helpful nor profound
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 03:20 AM
2

I disagree, I would say that they are going to say that the women are lying since its a survey and women can only lie on surveys thus the results are lies
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 02:02 AM
2

Someone post this article for karma and discussion and stuff I couldn't be bothered to do so. It is strange that many among the depressed could not give an answer when asked about how they reach that point. Depression does not merely remove one ability to think, it removes one's motivation to think. All deliberate actions are motivated by some goal a person has. If the goal loses its meaning, then it incurs sadness. If the meaning has lost its meaning then it incurs depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 01:55 AM
10

So why do so many women have such a negative view of all men? Are so many men evil, or are these women just really having bad luck with the men they are attracted to? The title is clickbait. Dont delude yourself into thinking they came to this conclusion on their own. Basically every single parent warns their children of nasty men. Here's a nice thought experiment. If you had a daughter, what are the some things you would warn her about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 09:58 PM
3

Didnt get the job. Not sure whether I should interpret this event, as a call for self improvement or as a call to cry
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 08:06 PM
2

Isn't this more related to economic issues?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 07:45 PM
1

We need a purge
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 07:37 PM
2

What was the post for anyone coming in late?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 04:35 PM
1

No, to purge these stupid ass op's off the face of reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 11:38 PM
1

can we have a purge
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 11:22 PM
1

as a plan B?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 10:39 PM
3

I'm going to a job interview tomorrow. For a job I really want. Any last minute tips?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 10:27 PM
1

Typically I am against basing such overarching postulates on observations because observation is most subject to the human biases. but I am really skeptical on this postulate Like more to transmit/receive useful information. Since what is you define as "useful information" is quite subjective. To say men objectively transmit useful information on this subreddit is quite the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 10:25 PM
4

Men, on average, compared to their feminine counterparts, usually Are less likely to see disagreements as personal attacks. ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 10:15 PM
2

Messege the lone squid
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 08:41 PM
2

Im honestly not sure if the op is joking and playing devils advocate or is being serious right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 06:55 AM
18

What do you think about it? I can be wrong, but I think it contradicts to the idea of hypergamy and that women look for a dominant partner. Really I think one thing RP gets wrong about hypergamy is that the man doesn't need to be entirely superior to the woman in all regards. Just in some aspects, (Like strength and looks). Its entirely possible for a woman to outclass her husband in intelligence and as long as he outclasses her in some regard, she is still attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 06:15 AM
1

dude I think thats breaking the rules
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 01:41 AM
4

Maybe its just lefty bias, but are RP monoliths like Rollo just bad writers? They either use repetitive sentence structure or rely a little too much on euphemisms and metaphors. or is it just me?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 06:33 AM
6

Or when rp says how your argument is sooo flawed and stupid and filled with false premises. and when you ask them to show how it is false they dont respond. or how rp just fucking loves to claim that the opposition is hamstering/solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 05:03 AM
1

Finally, since you agree that Upvoting what you agree is a bias, you also agree that the sub is just mostly populated by red and purple pillers, and also agree that one of the factors in upvoting is what people agree with. Both and more. I have to ask what you think the main factor in what gets upvotes and what doesn't get upvotes, in general. and why this view Although I like to think people here upvote based on entertainment first (we have way too many jokes as top answers) and second as good …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 02:30 AM
5

Although I like to think people here upvote based on entertainment first (we have way too many jokes as top answers) and second as good answers/points and PPD is one of the only subs where you get entire blocks of well thought out text as answers, and it have a good chance get in the top. Isn't this an very idealistic idea about ppd voters?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:58 AM
4

Is this not characteristic of bias then? Upvoting what you agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:44 AM
4

This is literally just rp circle jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:42 AM
5

Do you agree that people upvote what they like to see? Or upvote what they agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:35 AM
4

Things cant be mathematically 50/50 thats just not how it works... unless you want to just ban randos until you get the right ratio. Which would be bad for the sub for other reasons Not sure who you are arguing against. I explicitly stated that the sub ought to do nothing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:34 AM
7

If you let me, then I will press you on this topic. Call it a shit test would you say that, at least on debate subs, there is a sort of "natural selection" at work when you filter by top rated posts? Only high quality replies are at the top and low quality replies at the bottom?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:22 AM
6

I can't believe im saying this but.... thats apex fallacy dude just because two mods are bp doesn't mean the rest of the subreddit is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:10 AM
5

New research from Belgium suggests that cuckoldry occurs in 2 per cent of all families That's pretty small and insignificant dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 09:46 PM
10

2 hour old account I bet 50 bucks its an alt.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:29 AM
11

Hmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 07:52 PM
2

The point I was trying to make is that we don't know for sure. What you wrote, for all intents and purposes is hypothesizing on the motives of men and women. Not a relevant problem that researches have to account for when doing these surveys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 07:39 PM
5

Pro-tip: women lie. so do men until we can accurately gauge how much each sex lies, we have no choice but to take them by their word.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 06:57 PM
2

I think r/dick is a meme sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 05:49 PM
1

https://metro.co.uk/2020/01/20/man-caught-cheating-kiss-cam-people-cant-get-enough-disaster-moment-12090892/ lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 05:36 PM
0

based and red pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 04:53 AM
7

The instant they become women, 200 men line up outside their door, each with gifts and presents. They get 100k from beta bux Billy for existing. Then they go outside and they see that a stranger has gifted them a new car. There is a puddle in the way of the new car, a dude shoots himself in the head and used his corpse as bridge so the ladies can walk to their car. they drive to a bar, walking in for the first time. Chad shows up, he says "hey". They have sex right there on the bar. Happily ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 02:13 AM
1

you wanna bet?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 10:55 PM
0

the man tribe is gayyyy af
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 09:31 PM
2

Dont you think that what is man friendly means different things to a lefty and to a righty?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 08:31 PM
1

No I was asking whether that stance was politically motivated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 08:24 PM
2

Not sure which ppd group is smaller BP men or Rp women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 07:54 PM
4

What I said was whether trp labeling, and thus reasoning for its rejection of feminism could be politically motivated. And I like to wonder whether trp advice that feminism is a red flag could possibly be politically motivated. It's two equivalent statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 07:48 PM
9

feminism is a red flag for anti male attitudes and attitudes towards relationships that are bad for men What you have described is the reason trp rejects feminism. What I said was whether trp labeling, and thus reasoning for its rejection of feminism could be politically motivated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 07:40 PM
18

I have to look it up, but I remember reading that there is a pretty big overlap between trp users and the Donald. Once we establish the general connection between Trp=rightism, and add in the postulate that people only date those who share similar political beliefs. We get some interesting conclusions. I like to wonder whether trp advice that feminism is a red flag could possibly be politically motivated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 07:29 PM
6

I wonder when blue pill will ever entertain the idea that women can be morally questionable to their standards. Dude This is literally the top upvoted reply "I imagine some of them might be, but there are plenty of terrible women out there. Let's leave the questioning of random strangers' gender and and labelling of everything as a false flag to the bigots."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 08:50 PM
2

Yeah I know, Its just that this guy didn't put it under the automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:42 AM
1

???
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:37 AM
1

Would you say that you are BP or RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 01:35 AM
1

Any purples leaning blue can answer is what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 01:31 AM
2

Dude the flair is question for blue pill...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 12:20 AM
3

no incel content
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 10:53 PM
1

Just found out that my neighbor didnt put a password for his tv and speaker, I can connect to them via bluetooth. He has a wife and two kids. Give me ideas on what to blast his home with when he gets back from work? Will porn do? Keemstar saying the n word?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 05:31 PM
2

Women are more than the sum of hypergamy. I have a feeling some trpers would disagree with this. Especially the deep red types.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 06:30 AM
4

I don't think accusing people of biases will convince anyone really.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 04:49 AM
5

They weren't meant to be postulates. Editing post to close the gap between intended meaning and apparent meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 03:51 AM
15

They say that you always end up paying for women in one way or another. Whether that be paying directly for sex workers, paying for meals and drinks when dating a woman, paying in a marriage, paying years of your life building up status/career to attract women into your life, paying years of money and effort in the gym in the hopes that a woman might be attracted to your body etc. Two points. 1st, This seems to be a feature of traditional societies. Considering that most western societies, were …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 01:23 AM
8

Because most men don't think they are capable of change, or that they have indeed changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 12:03 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJeugIJFXas&feature=emb_logo I have no idea
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 06:08 AM
2

Found the one with the rp/fds user. HERE I am interested as to your thoughts on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 10:43 PM
7

Lmao you posted at /r/IncelsWithoutHate your argument is invalid
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 09:58 PM
1

I can't flair my post meta because there is no meta flair on mobile... What app are you using? I use RIF and meta flairs are available.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 09:36 PM
2

Why did you flair your post discussion when its clearly a meta post Flair your post meta. Now onto the topic at hand, Red pill women- basically pink pill/rad fem/ FDS user. Very rare actual red pill women. Honestly I don't see it. No woman with a rp flair supports pinkpill/fds The only rp women I can list off the top of my head is gimpgirl and atlas. I remember some older users that have disappeared really. /u/helleniclady has left this sub, but is still active on league of legends sub. u/dash_o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 09:30 PM
2

What happened? Why has every post been removed?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 05:52 PM
1

Dude you missed the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 04:20 PM
1

It's good because there's now actual opposition to rp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 03:56 PM
8

Would you believe that most rp'ers on that sub, claim ppd is filled with feminists and Blue pillers. After that WSJ article, pps seeing an influx of fds woman, which I view as a good thing. (Blue pill= anti red pill)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 06:06 AM
6

FDS is straight up people who are so high on their farts that they thing they are such awesome goddesses, that everyone should go legs over head to receive some condescending smile (result of being radfem) and half-assed sex (Reason of being anti-kink and anti-porn). whereas FDS is a female equivalent of incel/mgtow - an ugly being (both outside AND inside) that wants to be treated like royalty just because it exists Actually there has been some contention with this point on ppd I'll play the de…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 04:32 AM
2

Here comes a wave of fds themed posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 06:14 PM
1

Why didnt you just post them the pic right away, why did you have to ask? Are you honestly waiting for their response to post the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 05:31 PM
3

FDS bad Upvotes to the left
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 05:25 PM
1

for one, that's literally impossible I meant his popular ideas.....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 04:17 PM
3

oh damn https://nationalpost.com/news/jordan-petersons-year-of-absolute-hell-professor-forced-to-retreat-from-public-life-because-of-tranquilizer-addiction I dont agree with the dude, but I hope he recovers swiftly and without complications. Nobody deserves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 04:34 AM
1

Are you still alive?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 02:08 AM
1

I don't have much sympathy for incels... Username is ERADICATE_Them hmm..........
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 09:43 PM
2

Did you just post the same comment twice?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 09:18 PM
2

Did you just post the same comment twice?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 09:18 PM
5

Just browsing old ppd through https://redditsearch.io/ I have noticed that the discussion has not moved, this sub is still debating the same things in 2020 as it did in 2016. This is why I hate reddit, its just not a good place for meaningful discussions. Edit: On second thought I think this is just a symptom of internet forums in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 06:23 PM
1

Validation from their parents, second is women. I know your trying to make the argument that woman choosing these men causes them to get abusive, but can you just make the argument? Asking these questions isn't really going anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 04:23 AM
1

You mean "normal" as in the most prevalent right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 04:02 AM
-2

This The abuser should always be called on the carpet whether man or woman. seems to imply greater importance than this What can be frustrating is when the abused party doesn't take responsibility for their own agency in a relationship. Are you agreeing with my post? I know the abused should probably be told to make better decisions, but isn't that after telling to abusers to stop being abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 04:00 AM
1

in short, it's the same reason society doesn't bother asking criminals to please stop dealing drugs, committing fraud and robbing people. These behaviors often have disastrous consequences to their life, but to think they will ever listen to you is naive. I think I should of used clearer terms when I said society to "tell" men to stop being abusive. Editing post now. Generally, I meant "tell" as in put these men in therapy and or just locking them up. But yeah in that respect your right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:41 AM
0

I think the primary motivator for bad behavior in men(or bad behavior in general) is the parents enabling it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:30 AM
1

You put societies ability to change abusive men under scrutiny but not societies ability to change choosing women. Why? Do you believe by just telling a woman that shes with an abuser she will break up on the spot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:21 AM
2

Enabling an abuser is completely socially acceptable. It’s rewarded in most cases. If a woman tells her friends that she’s enabling an abuses the worst she’ll get is pity. She’ll be lauded for being strong or some shit. Where the hell do you live? If a woman says shes enabling an abuser, everyone and their grandmother will tell her to run.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:18 AM
2

Women experience higher rates of physical violence from intimate partners then men. I got that from page 48
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:12 AM
2

What do you think happens when bad behavior is rewarded? It proliferates. The key factor is who they are getting the "reward" from. If its not from their wives, then it is from their friends, their co workers, and anyone else really. Just because women don't choose them do they magically stop being abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:01 AM
5

You're argument is loaded with so many false premises Can you show them? You are just saying that my argument is false without actually showing that it is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 02:57 AM
1

Even if that was true how does that refute anything I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 02:56 AM
1

I don't understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 02:53 AM
3

that they're rarely painted as hypergamous without excusing it as a result of abuse or framing said mate as a complete and utter failure Lets take of the most popular films in western media. Disney movies, what do they show? Princess and the beast: mc marries a literal chad, the beast. Princess and the frog: mc hooks up with a fucking prince(hes broke but hes still a prince) how is that not a superb example of hypergamy? Literally in the first scene they show him he is surrounded by women. Pocah…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 07:34 PM
2

I think the moral is that people far more willing to help if there is something in it for themselves. Its not that people had nothing its just that they weren't willing to help the soldier.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:52 AM
1

Kinda just indulging in folk tales Heres a nice one , Its about an old lady and a soldier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pphUfE0ERt0
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 03:24 AM
4

The thing from The Thing(1982). Isn't she beautiful? Just Grade A wife material.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 06:28 PM
1

What is the state of u.s politics This is so fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 07:20 AM
4

The moment you give women freedom (which includes sexual freedom) they start following their hypergamous instincts, leaving a growing number of betas with less prospects of family and relationships. Any evidence for this claim or any sources? First thing that popped up when I googled it was this gaurdians article from 2012
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 05:03 AM
1

And the courts will rule them guilty of it because the cops arrested them in the first place. Thats not how the legal system works. Át least not in the US. At most you can say that there is a correlation between being arrested and being charged guilty. But to insinuate that there is a causation? Thats just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:54 AM
9

This is a different tangent but. Doesn't this also go the other way?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:43 AM
1

This is assuming that men who get arrested in these cases add to the statistics. The men aren't added to the statistics if they get arrested, they are added to the statistics if the court rules them guilty of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:40 AM
1

and if the statistics has shown that most attackers are men. Isn't it fair to assume that in a domestic violence case the attacker is probably a dude? Think of it like a rule of thumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:22 AM
18

Honestly I see more dudes complain about twitter feminists complaining about toxic masculinity, than I see twitter feminists actually complain about toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:20 AM
1

Then I have to ask you if you think the cops are justified in arresting the man first when responding to a domestic violence case.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:15 AM
1

Yeah, if they show up and arrest the man regardless, he's going to add to those statistics and she's going to get off scot-free and not be part of any statistic. This is a different position to your previous one then It's because women can't possibly be the aggressor, they're too special and perfect
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:00 AM
3

yet she returns every time without any new knowledge or understanding. Then your attacking her character, and not her arguments. ad ho·mi·nem /ˌad ˈhämənəm/ adjective adjective: ad hominem (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. "vicious ad hominem attacks" adverb adverb: ad hominem 1. in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. "these points come from some of our best information sources,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:50 AM
2

Its not because a majority of domestic violence, the woman is the is the victim. When the cops get there they are applying a heuristic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:43 AM
2

Because, like many sequels, its disappointing and treads on the same tired tropes and ideas. The character of u/LillthOfBabylon returns, reprising her role once again. Jesus christ dude How many ad hominoms do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:38 AM
1

If a wife starts beating up her husband and he calls the cops, he's going to get arrested. That is the 100% greatest social example of "all women are special and perfect." The assumed aggressor is him, just because he's a man. The assumed aggressor is him, just because he's a man. Why do you think the assumed aggressor is the man?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 03:36 AM
1

Looks like I've triggered one of them. And obviously you misread what I was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 11:59 PM
1

Looks like I've triggered one of them. Dude I was saying that your comment is virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 11:53 PM
1

TBP assumes the position of the moron. Posturing Posturing Posturing Posturing Posturing . (Its virtue signaling) If it works, it's successful. Period. If there are other things that "work", how would you respond to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 11:48 PM
5

shut up blue piller
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 08:39 PM
1

Its a fairly partisan way to go about it, but I suppose it still gets the point across.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 06:04 PM
2

This is some top tier bait
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 05:57 PM
1

Honestly, what is the point in giving a rp explanation to an audience of non rp'ers. It's like if a Muslim where to give you a an Islamic standpoint as to why alcohol is bad. You just say "ok" and forget his explanation. Until you can get us to believe your praxeology/worldview these explanations can only look like banal rants. So why not get to the point and explain why rp is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 04:37 PM
3

It's because he might cheat on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 04:24 PM
7

"Because she made a bad choice in a husband and it's in no way, shape, or form, the guys fault at all"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 03:58 PM
2

ask your mother
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 10:42 PM
5

I think its important to see if rpw actually gets results. (acquiring good men who wont cheat on you) I don't have a clue if it does but do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 10:09 PM
1

So saying that a woman is going to use red pill tactics is saying a woman is going to be a woman. I realize that I am changing positions but... Do you have a different idea of what rp tactics are?? from elves comment I'm assuming by TRP tactics you mean lift, develop confidence, approach tons of (wo)men, and push for sex as fast as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 08:05 PM
2

Im not sure what you are asking, do you want a link to the ppd glossary???? https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/wiki/terms
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 07:57 PM
2

/r/lostredditors
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 07:56 PM
1

The rp glossary of dread Dread Game - Purposefully inciting jealousy in an LTR by openly getting attention from other women. Soft Dread is similar, but less open. With Soft Dread, the attention doesn't even need to be real. Creating the possibilty for female attention is enough to get the hamster going. (If you develop a great body, she knows that other women will find that attractive without having to actually see other women displaying interest.) The purpose of using Dread is to get the target…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 07:51 PM
3

I meant tactics as the ones discussed in the TRP sub, (dread etc) Not what an everyday woman does.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 07:33 PM
7

"they all stole from men" His response
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 02:51 AM
3

One of the posters has lost his god damn mind(starts with a k) I don't know why he is so passionate and borderline inflamed about this topic and about the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 11:51 PM
3

Judging from her post history, I don't think shes from a western country dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 11:46 PM
2

oof I meant OP as the thread poster dude..... I still think shes overreacting
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 11:42 PM
1

The Y chromosome is fucked. No this isnt some radfem shit, but rather some scientific shit. Heres the link https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10577-011-9252-1
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 11:41 PM
3

Holy crap op this is obvious bait. Rape lasts an hour. You are literally imprisoning this man with a LIE for LIFE I thought you righties hated oppression Olympics
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 11:37 PM
2

It kinda looked like you were concern trolling...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 07:57 PM
1

Good luck dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 11:37 PM
3

Maybe play some video games or do something productive like cleaning your house. If you hate that your doing something unproductive then you will never move on. That usually gets my mind off of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 11:06 PM
4

Just found a break down of TRP and the psychology behind the group https://thepowermoves.com/the-truth-about-the-red-pill/ Its a pretty nice read.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 10:55 PM
1

O, that this too too solid flesh would melt Thaw and resolve itself into a dew! Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! O God! God! How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable, Seem to me all the uses of this world! Fie on't! ah fie! 'tis an unweeded garden, That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature Possess it merely. That it should come to this! But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two: So excellent a king; that was, to this, Hyperion to a satyr; so l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/20 02:40 AM
1

You know it probably wasn't the best idea to give a history lesson on Khmer rouge and the methods they used to kill babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:45 PM
1

Can you elaborate as to why he is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:44 PM
1

By definition BP worship women, because BP can't even criticize a woman. Women can do no wrong and must be defended. Can you make an argument that society or at least western society, voraciously defends women in every respect? Just off the top of my head, roughly half of US society assumes that when a woman gets an abortion she has done wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:43 PM
7

I can count with my fingers the times the red pill side spoke of feminism without either straw manning it, or just straight up fabricating things about feminism. You critize TRP? "It just works" they hide behind that phrase, using it to shield themselves from any logical criticism. They call any and all RP detractors "hamsters". They complain that feminism assumes that the women is the victim and the man is the aggressor. But then turn around and assume that in any squabble between the sexes, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 06:39 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ewo2yb/rmgtow_is_the_truth_and_it_frightens_society Oh he's such a poet "wormwood!" "Wormwood" I hear him cry "Hospital of the male soul" is mgtow? They must be comedians too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 03:45 PM
4

Holy hell r/mgtow is going wild over the quarantine. I think they are making reddit to be some feminist Orwellian company stamping out the truth that is their sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 03:37 PM
5

I think they quarantined the sub because of this https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/939kmv/us-coast-guard-officer-facing-gun-charges-researched-how-to-rid-us-of-the-jews-court-docs-reveal Not feminism really.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 03:29 PM
1

Really? I am basing this off of memory, but I remember giving stating a date as to when they will ban the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 06:00 AM
7

The admins are infamous for inconsistent rulings. The rules are more like suggestions to them. They banned r/gore but let r/medicalgore stay, they quarantined /r/waterniggas for no discernible reason what so ever. They took like 3 years to ban r/ageplaypenpals a known pedo fetish sub, while having rules that stated that any fetishization of children, fictional or otherwise is not allowed. Why they took 3 fucking years to ban that sub is mystery. A while back they threatened to banned TRP in 7 da…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 12:40 AM
1

Then they'll get counter argued , downvoted or drowned by the better replies.Thats how this sub works. This is an interesting idea, would you say that, at least on debate subs, there is a sort of "natural selection" at work when you filter by top rated posts? Only high quality replies are at the top and low quality replies at the bottom?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 10:05 PM
6

Assuming the non fdsers will be answering in good faith is just naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 09:43 PM
7

Who is [deleted] and why doesn't he let me see his posts?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 09:29 PM
12

I can't say this without sounding pretentious but A lot of TRP critiques of FDS is borderline r/selfawarewolves material.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 09:27 PM
1

Who would win in a fight Strength and abilities equal. A man with nothing to lose vs. A man with everything on the line?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:18 PM
1

He forgot that PPD is a gender neutral inclusive safe space.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:39 AM
2

c'mon that was weak, get better insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 03:53 AM
1

Was Hamlets mom cucking king hamlet with Claudius?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:36 PM
5

I just like debating, its why I browse /r/CapitalismVSocialism and /r/Abortiondebate . I also want to prove to myself that I can make coherent arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 08:10 PM
16

its men, just from the 2018 survey men outnumber women on this sub roughly 2;1
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 05:49 PM
0

Are you supposed to be challenging my statement? No it's value is it's usefulness to get laid. It is true enough to get men laid. If it does gets men laid then it is true no? Thus its value is still determined by its truth. Your not challenging anything. also People who think this is an ideology ideology https://www.lexico.com/definition/ideology NOUN A system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. Notice how it states especially but…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 09:40 PM
2

agnosticism to Gnosticism????
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 09:24 PM
2

The dog decided to leave but I already posted the picture in my local sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 06:04 PM
2

Im going to walk around and look for missing dog posters
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 05:27 PM
2

a dog followed me from the streets and I think it's someone's dog. It doesnt have a collar but it is unusually friendly for a stray dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 05:23 PM
8

Odd to see /r/DeadBedrooms vocally rejecting /r/TheRedPill The reason? They say it doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 05:35 AM
3

The PPD discord is pretty nice ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 02:46 AM
1

This is going to get removed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 09:11 PM
3

I assume your room is pretty messy and you are behind chores? This is how depressions shows itself, through symptoms. What you need to do is to create purpose for yourself. You must think of yourself as trash, lacking self worth. But to cure this is to. Try to give yourself a reason to live. For to base your self esteem and self worth off of your success with women is doomed to fail. Try to base your self worth off of something else. Maybe its a hobby. Maybe its your family, Just try and have se…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 07:32 AM
1

you suck
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 02:12 AM
1

Ok thanos, it does sound nice. Is it a utopia? It's much more difficult to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:54 PM
1

Also the link for science post I made just broke Oof.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:38 PM
1

Holy shit the link just broke Deleting post
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:37 PM
3

Noticing a lot more rp guys are commenting right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:27 PM
0

There's a big difference between ISIS/cults/political orgs and TRP. At the most basic level, people come to these ideologies looking for solutions to problems in their lives But you can yap until the end of the world about how he shouldn't use demonstrably working strategies to get in a girl's pants, because it "objectifies women" or whatever. You seem to have picked the worst argument against trp, then act like that is the only arguement against trp. Are you new to this sub? You cant just straw…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 09:23 PM
1

AF/BB was an slight change to the dual mating strategy hypothesis, You just proved that the basis of af/bb was the dual mating strategy. Also you just changed positions from because unlike in the "dual strategy model" a woman "is never really yours, it is only your turn". To , like how women are 'never yours' something the dual mating strategy supposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 08:44 PM
1

Dude, dual mating strategy was the explanation for af/bb.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 08:24 PM
9

Young, immature, insecure, shy men is perfect recruiting material for literally every ideology/movement ever. Jehovah Witnesses vet for frustrated young men. Neo Nazis(they exist) specifically look for these kind of men and try have give them answers to their condition. Most RP dudes would agree that only sexually frustrated and shy dudes need TRP. That's why they have field reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 07:45 PM
4

The mods took their sweet ass time approving this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 07:31 PM
1

It stops being a patriarchy when there are no longer a majority of men in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 06:53 PM
1

Isn't this a CMV? mods????
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 05:39 PM
3

Boys/men failing in school/academia is celebrated in the media I have never seen this, ever. Can you cite an example?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 06:00 AM
3

I never really understood the claim that patriarchal societies are the optimal form of society. As far as I have understood, most people agree that there has never been a matriarchal society in history. But to somehow use that statement as evidence for the former, it just doesn't make any sense. Patriarchy da best----Never has there been a matriarchy When you try and make the logical connection between these two statements, you invariably make a number of unverifiable assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 02:42 AM
4

"men have it worse so it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things" /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 08:31 PM
1

I don't really see the misrepresentation at all. Does the RP not advocate this? Red Pill advocates is taking advantage of common weak points in the typical female psyche and this? Users advise doing things like keeping her guessing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 08:02 PM
1

How do you get a 99% out of a four?.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 07:42 PM
0

I suppose you believe in the naturalistic fallacy then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 07:33 PM
1

How religious argument about atheists. But applied in a non religious case. I have no idea what this means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 04:29 PM
3

This comment from 6 years ago seems to explain why so many think that TRP works. And ultimately, the primary thing that enables TRP or anything similar is confirmation bias. There may be a few elements of truth, and I even think that some of the problems they identify are serious, however for the most part TRP is series of theories from intuition. Evidence is then gathered to support a previously established conclusion. Ultimately, this "positive testing" is completely contrary to what science w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 03:55 PM
8

r/threadkillers
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 06:56 AM
2

I thought people get existential crisis's at their 40's or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 05:45 AM
3

Hearing from the men and women on this sub speaking of their well ordered lives, the ability to know their own self. good fucking god I just figured out that being introspective doesn't mean that you know anything about the nature of your character. Descartes was correct in his rejection of epistemological transparency of thought. Or transparency through having. If I was asked with defining who I am, based on the superficialities that I know of myself, I can only give a half assed answer. Only r…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 05:03 AM
2

lmao are guys unable to hold a LTR? why are only females responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 04:41 AM
1

Dark souls remastered or sekiro are good choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 01:28 AM
1

Thank you very much!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 11:51 PM
4

now we have women actively admitting all the things they say? Not so sure about this part.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 10:14 PM
4

A recent-ish study concluding that the evidence for the dual mating strategy hypothesis, (and by extension AF/BB) is inadequate. Not posting because I don't have access to read the study. Also here a nice article detailing the evidence for AF/BB. Has a lot of nice sources that go with and against the dual mating strategy. Ez karma opportunities people get with it before I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 10:12 PM
2

"RP is a response to BP as defined by RP. BP, as defined by BP, is a response to RP" Also RP is making positive claims, unlike atheism. RP doesn't just deny that women are wonderful and can do no wrong It makes multiple positive claims like hypergamy af/bb and awalt. I am not talking about the existence of RP, I am talking about the existence of the term BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 06:49 PM
2

Maybe we can have a vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 05:54 PM
1

Well why did your ex punch a penguin? in the face
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 01:56 AM
5

It doesn't matter if he gets impeached the dems will find a way to fuck up the 2020 election and will let trump win again. I say this as a leftie
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 01:49 AM
1

How did you get bit on the ass by an ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 01:46 AM
1

I like to write things out here first before posting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 10:01 PM
3

wow, this comment from 6 years ago holds my exact sentiments of TRP And ultimately, the primary thing that enables TRP or anything similar is confirmation bias. There may be a few elements of truth, and I even think that some of the problems they identify are serious, however for the most part TRP is series of theories from intuition. Evidence is then gathered to support a previously established conclusion. Ultimately, this "positive testing" is completely contrary to what science would advocate…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 09:41 PM
3

Isn't womens appearance mostly genetics? There is an old saying "you can't put makeup on a pig" If she is ugly, makeup wont fix that. Also doesn't women's appearence need more "maintenance" then men? But judging by genetics nowadays is worthless since cosmetic surgery exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 09:14 PM
3

Even more studies This one has evidence that doesn't support the dual mating strategy hypothesis. Doesn't debunk it, but merely suggest the evidence isn't in its favor. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/29/1/51/4496683 Repost for ez karma Also I got bit by an iguana how is your day?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 06:24 PM
5

When I was 16, I was really socially avoidant and I had socially anxiety. I also had mediocre grades, and only really played video games when I got home from school. I was self aware of this, and I realized that unless I changed, I would not get anywhere in life. I hated being an introvert. I would look at my more confident and socially successful friends with girlfriends and just think why I can't do the same. I chose to change electives to a psychology class in high school. I thought that mayb…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 03:00 AM
7

MCFC is undeniably the system that has dominated human history and the evolutionary process. The paper explicitly rejects this, basically the jist of their argument is that if humans did operate under the MCFC model, then humans would show traits consistent with other species that follow a MCFC model. Humans don't show these traits, Therefore the MCFC model is lacking. - is their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 12:01 AM
3

But what does this mean to the RP claim that "Evo Pysch supports RP"? Did you read the paper? My bad, I probably should have pointed out that the article was written in 2013. The Evo psych consensus could have changed from 2013 to now. Here is one paper also written in 2013 that is a response to that paper above and stands in agreement. (more like congratulatory dance, but you get the point) Are you coo coo for coco puffs? Here is a paragraph from it Thus, the MMC view’s descriptive accuracy may…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 10:33 PM
1

and suppose I was context deaf. How would that exonerate the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 08:54 PM
1

You accuse me of hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 08:28 PM
5

Not once did you define what a "blue pilled society" is or what it actually means. Can you describe any qualities of blue pilled society? Any traits that differentiate it from other societies? If we are going to have a debate over how good a blue pilled society is to women, but not define blue pilled society. It will result in posters responding to this post with their own conception of "blue pilled society" is and a lack of a unified definition will mean the debate can't ever move off the groun…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 08:18 PM
1

I suppose you share the same sentiment for this article. LINK The author literally calls MMC the "red pill" of mate choice models. Because it doesn't give us any wild conclusions that MCFC does. He says it is difficult to believe that it doesn't really advance our understanding of human nature. Thus, the MMC view’s descriptive accuracy may count against it in the domains of pop psychology and college pedagogy. Instead of allowing us to indulge in MCFC paleo-fantasies of alpha male despots and ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 06:13 PM
1

h a h a h a a h h a a h a h a h
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 05:52 PM
1

Well, generally the post that get upvoted are post which have not been asked before, is clear and easy to understand, and isn't too "condescending" per se. The post of mine was generally unhelpful in the grand scheme of things, and I probably worded it a little confusingly and there a post similar to that one (I think it was called PPD blindspots) so it might of looked like I was a lazy copycat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 05:30 PM
1

are you BP or RP or BP?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 05:23 PM
2

Well look what I have found LINK It is a pdf and it might prompt a download on mobile. But the jist of it is that two evolutionary psychologist argue that Evo Psych should move from a MCFC(males compete females choose) model of human mate selection, and focus more on a MMC(Mutual mate choice) model. The MMC model is that both females and males compete for desirable mates. I think RP ascribes to the MCFC model. I wonder if I should make a post about this asking what RP thinks of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 05:02 PM
1

But if I play enough sudoku and suck enough dick. My gayness levels will overflow and reset back to 0. Thus sudoku will allow me to hit nirvana. The peak of critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 03:56 AM
2

Sudoku is the best game to play if you want to develop/exercise your critical thinking skills . CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 02:22 AM
2

I'm not really sure how the third link helps your case, I read it and it doesn't really make any explain as to whether emotions interfere with logic. It just states that modern day human decisions are mostly emotional, not logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 10:16 PM
3

Well, if you want a healthy mental state, then you need X.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 08:29 PM
1

The account was 2 hours old, probably a smurf account. Edit: the mods reversed the removal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 06:56 PM
1

2 hour old account No wonder they removed it. Edit: Never mind its back.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 06:55 PM
2

Who here has solved the secret of motivation? If you did solve it, can you please tell me. Because it feels like I have forgotten it. Chores and books that I would normally have no qualms in finishing, are just getting more daunting as the days go by. I haven't read shit last week.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 03:39 AM
1

I think she means by hypergamy as, "the best of a womans available options " . Those men aren't available.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 12:02 AM
4

Monogamy required men to be above women in social/financial standing to work. Can you elaborate on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 11:57 PM
3

[uncountable] faith (in somebody/something) trust in someone's ability or knowledge; trust that someone or something will do what has been promised https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/faith If Jim wants to use a different definition of faith, that is fine. But to pretend that the definition jim used is the only definition of faith,is just wrong. That is why I had to clarify his definition of faith. You are right that with Jim's definition, the belief in rp w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 08:19 PM
1

I did hear him, I just think that is his opinion and his interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 07:48 PM
1

Need to ask because Christians have a different notion of faith. He could have been using that notion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 07:29 PM
3

Depends on how we define faith. Do you have the atheist notion of faith? "Irrational belief"?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 05:58 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:57 PM
8

Personally I'm just astonished as to how confident rp'ers are in rp. They are as confident in rp as a evangelist is confident in god. If you read confident as faith, you get some interesting conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:49 PM
9

A small, thin woman will always defeat six or more highly trained henchmen, military personnel, and security guards. That's just a fact of life. You can replace woman with man, and it would still be unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:50 AM
4

If we assume that they are hetero, then by definition yes they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 02:25 AM
6

Lmao this is a MGTOW bashing thread in disguise.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 02:16 AM
2

The closest thing we have to a "lovecraftian horror" in real life is a radioactive object. Just knowing that being near it is deadly, but we cant see it, smell it. It is invisible and undetectable. There is a constant danger but we cannot identify that danger through the senses. I can only speak for myself, but that is honestly terrifying. That kind of fear is the closing thing to what lovecraftian horror evokes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 02:10 AM
1

The video sounds like an impromptu speech. I'm not sure how you plan your videos but it sounds like one long continuous talk. Maybe segmenting your speech into different parts will help with the videos flow.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 10:33 PM
1

De celerating, I remember a statistic posted here a week ago stating that women now outnumber men in the workforce. I think it will slow down in the upcoming years.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 09:39 PM
5

Probably just an effect of capitalism pushing women into the workplace. The workplace was once thought as "the man's club". More women going into it is breaking down that societal idea. Thanks to machines, the difference in work output between a man and a woman so minute that it doesn't make a meaningful impact. There are no longer any big incentives to keep a woman from working in your company. Once the kingdom of man has been invaded by women, it no longer remains the kingdom of "man".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 09:35 PM
1

Wow this music is amazing https://youtu.be/t-9xbgTHpLA Is there a name for this kind of genre?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 08:46 PM
4

It's ok to pump and dump because maybe she might feel bad for a week, but then she would move on and forget all about you. Now this has funny implications. Under certain contexts(making false promises) pumping and dumping is seen as a moral failure. From now on when I say Pump and dumping(PD) I mean the any PD committed under false promises. First let us assume (was agree) that PD is an act and commiting the act is morally wrong. So your argument would like this. PD isn't wrong because the perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 05:54 PM
6

What's with all the dudes commenting?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 04:49 PM
3

Inb4 some rp'er calls it "feminist BP trash".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 04:41 PM
12

You could say that religiosity implies traditionalism, but traditionalism doesn't imply religiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 03:29 PM
1

I mean what is the process to figuring out what does work? If I am being poetic, you could say that most of science moves off of the scientific method. Falsifying hypothesis which could be thought of as an idea of "what should work".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 04:05 AM
1

If you reject this What should work Then how on earth will we ever know what does work?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 03:57 AM
2

Maybe i'm wrong but I tend to notice that RP dudes generally seem to be "practice over theory" kind of people. Or a person whos primary concern is what works rather than what should work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 03:35 AM
1

Also dude just a quick tip I know you put the periods between the percentages to avoid it becoming all cluttered together. Since reddit formatting doesn't allow spaces, so you put periods instead. But a quick tip you can use to put space between words/numbers without the periods is to use   to put space. Remove the \ For example this 18-24....................100%..........16.7% can beccome this 18-24 100% 16.7% This is how it looks in editor can beccome this 18-24       &nbsp…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 02:17 AM
2

Is this a CMV or what? Flair your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 01:59 AM
1

I think compliments from women would lose most of its meaning, The reason that dude remembered it is because they are so rare. If women complimented men regularly then would he have any reason to remember it? If gold was as common as sand would we still value it as much as we value it now? This doesn't mean I disagree that women shouldn't compliment men. At the end of the day I still think the world would be a little better place if they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 01:49 AM
1

Reminds me of this "bitches love sticks" - Ron the bower bird
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 01:45 AM
1

It seems weird that most acts of vigilante justice are done in prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:49 PM
4

Isn't that a perfect example of female and male hypergamy? Selecting a young, fertile woman to carry your genes? Is that not the best mate possible for an older man?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 08:26 PM
4

I have no idea what your talking about. The wife? who is the wife? Your wife? and what is this supposed to mean? Opposite: inadequate, enraged, defensive, disinterested.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 08:18 PM
3

Mmmh? People chose traditional sex dynamics before the invention of feminism. Societies chose but the individual people did not. Anyone other than the highest class women where punished if they did not conform to trad roles. Your country gave you freedom of speech and you dare to criticize the government I think a more apt analogy would be "Your country gave you freedom of speech yet you advocate for the abolishment of free speech"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 08:17 PM
1

You mean that teensy tiny little conflict is representative of the opinions all feminist hold?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 05:03 PM
15

You know how righties talk of commies badmouthing capitalism yet are enjoying products produced by capitalism? This reminds of that. She rails on against feminism yet is also enjoying the fruits of feminism. They didn't advocate that being a tradwife is bad. They advocated that being forced to be a tradwife is bad. Yet she thinks that choosing to be a tradwife is somehow spitting on feminism? The only reason she is making the choice is because of feminism. Creating her identity on the fact that …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:49 PM
3

I'm just more confused about the admins game plan. First they quarantine the sub. Then threaten to ban it within a week. Then say that the threat was a mistake. What are they trying to do? They give the attitude of a child, tasked to pick between two flavors of ice cream.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 07:08 AM
2

If the admins banned /r/TheRedPill how do you think this sub would react?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 05:55 AM
1

Sorry I probably phrased the question oddly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 05:14 AM
1

Western culture is an feminist Orwellian state brainwashing the population into believing feminist lies?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 05:04 AM
1

What do you think "red pilled" means? Anything that furthers this? reconciling the delta between what we are socialized to believe women (and men too to a certain extent) are like, on the one hand, and what women are actually like, on the other
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:08 AM
2

This is the problem with anecdotes dude. You can rephrase the question as "If my wife cheated on me then it means that all/most women are cheating on their husbands" and it would mean (mostly)the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:55 AM
1

Not all of us accept TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:49 AM
2

Let me guess you think what I said was red pilled. Does give some funny philosophical implications. Is truth red pilled? does that mean that saying the sky is blue is red pilled? Obviously that's way to broad and that's not what somebody means when they say red pilled so it must be narrower than that. Is truth and human nature red pilled? Is saying women carry babies red pilled? This still runs into the first problem laid out above. What is "Red pilled" must be narrower than that. I define "red …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:43 AM
7

Who the hell is going to be the relationship guy? If we are fitted with the goals that most men have today, You can turn a variety a partners into a relationship if you want. Then choosing the sex guy is the logical choice. Sex guy for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:14 AM
30

I think they mean that they view sleeping with lots of low quality men as poor decision making. and the idea that she wont sleep with you must mean that she thinks you are low value. If working from the principle that women sleep with High Value men at the first chance they get. If she puts a timer until she sleeps with you then what does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 02:01 AM
1

after reading more and more about Evolutionary psychology. Its quite an interesting field, just as valid as any other of the social sciences. But now I think that TRP is a bastardization of Evo Psych. Coming up with wild, unscientific conclusions that evolutionary psychologists have explicitly rejected. I will write a CMV about it in the upcoming week.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 08:50 PM
1

be careful hes going to call you a homosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 08:01 PM
1

Doesn't exist The wage gap. Women don't get paid less for the same job, they just choose lower paying jobs. This just means that this interpretation of the wage gap Women get paid less for the same job is wrong but this interpretation of the wage gap they just choose lower paying jobs Is true. Your not disproving the idea of the wage gap your just saying that one notion of it is wrong. To insinuate that leftist still use the 1 is really just a strawman. Leftist discussion has already moved from …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 08:00 PM
6

Living in a desert is a mans best strategy for acquiring women. Because hes hotter if he lives in a desert.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 07:33 PM
5

Have you considered the possibility that many of them are simply out to troll? Here is a pretty good write up on trolling But generally it could be that they are seeking to destroy the common good of this community. They think of themselves as a public service. Viewing the common good as a "delusion" that they have to save us from. Dogmatically forwarding blackpill to anyone who they think is capable of handling it. Only those who are sure of themselves can do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 07:31 PM
1

You hit the nail on the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 04:15 AM
4

She can't or doesn't understands the way I do/view things. She also doesn't understand why editing your Reddit comment after someone replies to it feels good.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 04:10 AM
1

no no no to add on to what tnats said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 11:11 PM
1

"Man is a rational animal who loses his temper when called to act according to reason" - I forgot who said it but it was a 17th-15th century philosopher
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 11:09 PM
1

They follow the feminist mindset of men being evil Plus lots of feminists expect chivalry from men This is an example of affirming the consequent fallacy Lets assume that it is true of that if someone is a feminist, they hold the mindset that men are evil. So F(feminist) then M(mindset of men being evil) You state that FDS has M So you conclude that FDS is F? That's not how logic works.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 10:49 PM
2

This is pretty good thread material dude. You should make a CMV or a discussion about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 09:51 PM
1

How does this answer my question? Unless you think its a stupid question.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 07:42 PM
1

How do you tell if it works or not? Also this is meant to be in a discussion as to whether anecdotes can prove that TRP is true. You say that it only matters if it works. Too add another question, if something works then is that something true? Like if throwing eggs at strangers works to get them mad, then does that mean that the premise (throwing eggs at strangers gets them mad) is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 06:50 PM
0

What does your statement mean to the people in my example? That they're fools? Hell; I see many RP'ers explain that the reason they are 100% commuted to TRP, is because it perfectly describes what they see in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 06:34 PM
1

TRP actually explains many of the behaviors of the market pretty confidently How do you know this? This is an objective claim is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 06:20 PM
1

This is really meant to be said in a discussion as to whether TRP is true or not. Unless truth is subjective?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 06:14 PM
0

The only problem is that there isn't really an objective way to view personal experience. It is heavily affected by psychological biases and on top of that it is up to interpretation. It is just a crap way to falsify anything. Let alone something like TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 06:04 PM
3

More random qoutes. "Never use the word never." “I have freely chosen to embrace determinism” "There is no truth." “You should not judge” “The scientific method is the only means of knowing truth” “History is unknowable” “Language cannot carry meaning” “What's true for you isn’t true for me”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 04:47 AM
1

I guess in preparation for college I have been watching random college professors on youtube give lectures on different subjects and trying to note down what they are saying with pen and paper. I am trying to get better at note taking, is a good regime for improving a persons note taking skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 01:21 AM
2

No?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 09:45 PM
3

Like the OP is straw manning? or the posters are straw manning?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 09:45 PM
2

So do individual liberals who are not in any group get the best of both worlds? Open minded thinking and openness to ideas? A win for me I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 07:07 AM
2

Just edit it on the description dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 06:42 AM
5

Women figure out their social standing relative to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 04:31 AM
1

Space communism
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 02:37 AM
1

I am pretty sure the OP is a girl. I guess your first point still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:34 AM
1

Well my source cites internet encyclopedia of philosophy as its source. So I guess by the transitive law, the IEP is my source then. Here is the link https://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#AdHominem
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:32 AM
1

We have different definitions of ad hominem. How would you suppose we resolve this dispute?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:20 AM
1

Are the only people responding female?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:16 AM
1

Dude it becomes an ad hominem when then argument includes an irrelevant personal attack and suggest that this attack undermines your argument. For example This would be an ad hominem What she says about Johannes Kepler's astronomy of the 1600s must be just so much garbage. Do you realize she's only fifteen years old? But this isn't Fuck you kevin. Your argument is unsound and the premises do not flow. More info on this website https://www.outpan.com/app/bc6e214ae3/aristotle
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:11 AM
2

Excellent rebuttal, how can I ever be as smart and as well written as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 12:00 AM
2

The whole point of me asking that question is say that claims like yours can only be falsified with statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 11:40 PM
3

Well, in order to do that we would have to remove the cultural idea that those who seek it are miserable and desperate. We would also have to remove the idea that prostitution is an "easy" and pitiful job. I think that those two ideas are the root of the cultural stigma of prostitution. You could say that prostitution is a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 11:20 PM
2

He's talking about prostitution not sex habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 11:15 PM
-1

and if I say you're wrong; how would you go about settling the dispute?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 10:45 PM
1

I don't get, is he choosing the girl to hookup with?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 10:00 PM
1

Both of these statements are false and very obviously so. But even if either were true: I got my elections mixed up on the trump part. But the first statement is still true SOURCE is not a correct conclusion since conservatives (modern conservatives at least) What do you mean by "modern conservatives" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 07:54 PM
1

Are you basing your claim "men aren't allowed to judge woman" off of the replies of this reddit post which is internet culture and then applying that to the whole social dynamics of men and woman? You understand what is "culture" right? the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group. It is inherently tied to the social group, and if we say that "men judging woman" is a cultural taboo. Then the whether or not the act is a taboo is en…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 06:57 PM
1

Can you cite any matriarchal societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 03:11 PM
5

Just caught a scuffle between /r/MGTOW and /r/GenderCritical over [THIS] (https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/ennk7y/my_brother_is_a_mgtow/) post in GC and [THIS] (https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ennwfg/my_brother_is_a_mgtow_help_link_in_comments/) response to that post on MGTOW moking it. The comments in mgtow are hilarious, I have never seen so many straw mans.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 11:36 PM
6

if you have the time are you willing to play a little logic game? regurgitate all their beliefs Are these beliefs what make up TRP or are these beliefs a result of believing in TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 08:39 PM
2

So the ability to change a persons mind on a belief is dependent on the certainty they hold on that belief? Are the levels of certainty concrete or is it more muddled? Can a person be half way between 1 and 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 06:51 PM
2

From my experience, pointing out a incompatibility/inconsistency with someones views is the most effective way to change someones mind. Although this would require knowing all the positions that person holds.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 06:14 PM
4

In Iran(not now due to protest) and Saudi Arabia women can access the internet. Unless you want to argue that men and women have equals rights in those countries? All this means is that we cannot say that internet access is proof of equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:33 AM
4

So does that mean that there is more than 1 possible interpretation to what she says? Determining the correct interpretation through examining the context of which it was said in. If you agree with my first two postulations, then Can you make an argument proving that the context she made that claim is in a political context?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:57 AM
1

Thats a different claim but I guess that means we agree on what she meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:47 AM
6

You want someone else to cut your baby into pieces, alive, and pull the pieces out of your vagina if you so choose. And you want this to be free, so someone else pays. I don't want to pay for your butchery. I don't want you to cut a baby into pieces, alive. Fuck it I have the time to argue semantics with some dude. She says access to abortion, not payment for abortion. I think she means that people have the right to not be denied an abortion for any reason other than lack of payment. We would ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:30 AM
6

Already exists, unless you refer about equal outcomes, which is a dumb ideal to follow. She says she is not from the US so how do you know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:16 AM
15

It's based on what power, privilege, and influence looks like to men and what men would want - The hidden premise being that power,privilege means drastically different things different groups with different goals? That there is no objective sense of power/privilege? Thats literally postmodernism. I thought TRP rejects postmodernism. Power means a much different thing to women than it does to men, though people seem incapable of realizing this and keep measuring women on maleness. So power is su…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 03:21 AM
9

I guess you like your women with big penises no?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 02:16 AM
1

Would that mean you agree with my assertion that Gender essentialism uses this definition of "nature" [singular] the basic qualities of a thing Reply if you want im going to sleep. Edit: No longer come up with points and now you are resorting to insults? Earlier you changed positions from my definition of nature to your definition of nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:44 AM
1

In that very same link scroll down to number 4 and you will see the definition I presented. There are mutliple definition of "nature" thus which one to pick depends on which on the term is using. What definition of nature do you think Gender essentialism is using? Since "The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different (basic qualities), determined biologically rather than culturally or "The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different (things that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:39 AM
1

NARURE I'm just going to ignore that. Here is my definition of nature. [singular] the basic qualities of a thing From the Oxford glossary my friend
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:14 AM
1

NATURE, determined by biology rather than culturally. Define nature then, give me another oxford definition of nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:10 AM
1

"Determined biologically RATHER than culturally" That single word alone proves that it does deny cultural influences. "it speaks nothing of differing cultural influences" because it inherently denies those cultural influences. Don't say that as proof that it merely "speaks" of differing natures. It claims that the natures are biological that the natures are inherently biological. You’re making up your own definitions Repeating a claim is not affirmation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:02 AM
1

You didn't define a fucking thing. "Gender essentialism covers both" This is the Oxford definition you gave me in response to my definition The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different natures, determined biologically rather than culturally. This involves an equation of gender and sex. Stating that gender essentialism covers both is wish wash humpty dumptysim. You’re making up your own definitions repeating a claim does not make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 05:52 AM
1

What definition of nature are you working with?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 05:42 AM
1

Claiming that some female behavior is determined by biology is essentialism. It’s not FULLY determined by biology, To claim that the latter is gender essentialism is a contradiction yourself, notice within the oxford definition of gender essentialism makes this point The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different natures, determined biologically rather than culturally. This involves an equation of gender and sex. What do you think "determined biologically rather than cul…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 05:37 AM
1

Nobody is claiming people’s futures are determined by their biology. That is gender determinism. I gave you the Oxford definitions of the two terms how are you still straying from them. Sensible biologists are claiming that there are real biological influences that are responsible for women entering nursing careers. Such claims are gender essentialism, not biological determinism. No its not since it does not claim that these biological influences are responsible for making up a woman's nature th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 05:09 AM
1

It don't deny this what I deny is this people are beholden to these differences This is what academics deny. The whole point of our semantics war to figure out what academics really deny. For denying Gender essentialism does not mean denying this They are basic qualities of men and women, such as sex hormones that do in fact, have a part in determining behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 04:42 AM
1

Those natures are DETERMINED by biology. Evolution. Sex hormones. and That doesn’t mean people are beholden to these differences. Yes it does. If something is within your nature then you cannot escape that nature. Thats why is called nature and not "general tendancy" The term uses this definition of nature "​ [singular] the basic qualities of a thing" Btw I got that from the oxford dictionary 4th definition LINK What you are attempting to do is called a distinction with a difference
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 04:32 AM
1

This is the oxford definiton of gender essentialism you gave me The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different natures, determined biologically rather than culturally. This involves an equation of gender and sex. Here is an oxford definition of biological determinism The idea that an individual's personality or behaviour is caused by their particular genetic endowment, rather than by social or cultural factors—by nature rather than nurture It is obvious that the two term…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 03:58 AM
6

Guess who just wasted all their free time arguing semantics with a dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 03:34 AM
1

You seem to be misinterpreting what Gender essentilism means. Then you will reply with "no im not it means (this)" Then I will reply with "no it means (this)" Then you will reply with " no (expletive) this is what it means (this) We will be arguing fucking semantics if we continue this any further. Case and point this whole debate was a waste of time if you want to continue wasting both our lives on a stupid ass debate on semantics then ill your guest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 03:29 AM
1

You did not refute what I said. Hell, it seems you agree and have provided evidence to bridge the gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 03:16 AM
1

The belief that males and females are born with distinctively different natures, determined biologically rather than culturally. This involves an equation of gender and sex analytically this Look, there is female and male nature. Does not imply this essential component of sex that is biological. You need evidence/synthetic claims to bridge the gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 03:05 AM
1

The idea that one is fixed by their biology is gender determinism, not essentialism. The distinction is odd since people use the two terms interchangeably. Think about it this way. If X is part of being's Y nature or essence then being Y cannot escape X, and being Y is determined, thus fixed by X. Being Y can only act within X and thus Being Y is defined by X. If X means a trait or behavior. so this “Females can only gravitate towards nursing roles” is biological determinism, not gender essentia…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 02:33 AM
1

I got that definition from this paper from acedemics exploring gender essentialism https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.871.3140 Its open source but it will prompt you to download a pdf. Its from page 4 this paragraph Ontologically theories of gender and gender difference can largely be categorised as social constructionist and essentialist. Social constructionists explain phenomena as being created by and contingent on social factors such as language and culture. They seek t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 01:48 AM
1

Feminists outright reject the idea that males and female are born with different behavioral natures. They don't reject the biological differences they reject the different idea of different "natures" or "essences". Even then that only really applies to libfems The idea that human females biologically gravitate towards nursing behavioral roles is gender essentialism I don't know what to say other than that isn't gender essentialism. Gender essentialism is more like saying "females can only gravit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 01:16 AM
1

Here is a definition of gender essentialism. Gender essentialism is defining women's(or mans) essence in terms of biological capacities. A rejection of Gender essentialism can mean rejecting the differences in biological capacities between men and women. This is the position twitter goons take. However that is not the only way to reject Gender Essentialism. For most mainstream academics they reject the defining a woman's essence in terms of biological capacities. Not rejecting the existence of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 12:37 AM
1

Ok, I see your example and I will try and get definitions out of the way. I define blue pill as mainstream opinion of academia. Those twitter morons aren't what I define as Blue pill. I was arguing this entire time with that definition in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 11:20 PM
1

Honestly I don't know how to resolve this debate since its basically "(R)X says Y" "(B)No X says Z" "(R) No X says Y it does not say Z" "(B) dum dum it says Z" "(R) eat shit furfag"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 11:00 PM
1

My apologies, it seems that I have failed to make myself clear and I have worded my point poorly. What I meant by the "idea of alcoholic" I didn't mean the actual word alcoholic. What I meant is what comes with the word alcoholic but not word itself. Say for instance is the idea that alcoholics are making a moral failure. Or the idea that alcoholics are suffering a disease. That is the social construct I was talking about. In your post. It’s obvious in how they speak of gender differences as sol…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 10:43 PM
2

Social construction does not imply illusion. There are two types of social constructs. Idea construction = Claims that the idea of something is socially constructed and Constitutive construction =Claims that something itself is socially constructed. What BP'ers are trying to say is that the idea of gender is socially constructed. This does not imply that sex is socially constructed. Think of it like this, alcoholics themselves is not socially constructed. Drinking lots of alcohol is a matter of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 10:15 PM
0

When you go from BP “men and women are exactly the same I argue BP'ers don't hold this view hell even feminist don't hold this view. Only maybe humanistic psychologist hold this view,
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 09:38 PM
3

You just gave me an idea for a post. But anyways it does seem strange how evolution would select for boys into liking toy soldiers and girls into liking plastic kitchen sets.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 06:46 PM
4

Point being, my boys have never played with my daughters kitchen set. To suggest neutral is the starting point for kids is silly; it's not the reality of it. They clearly have preferences very early on. Is this because of an innate hardwired preference? or do they have these preferences due to their environment? Because if its the latter your point doesn't really land.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 06:32 PM
0

When it's not pointlessly gendered for men its because the evil feminist overlords are conspiring to change men to beta bux cucks. See? I can make vacuous statements too
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 06:21 PM
1

Yes we justify gravity justify verb show or prove to be right or reasonable. Thats why we science and the general population believes in gravity. Gravity has been proven to be true. (until you reach sub-atomic particles but thats a discussion for another day)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 05:50 AM
1

I though we were describing the idea of societies tendency to view male life as less valuable and more disposable then female? What you describe is true but it seems to be far removed from male disposability. A possible justification for male disposability, but until male disposability is proven to be true. Your premise can only remain as a singular premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 05:41 AM
2

I can't really answer since I reject the premise of male dispoability. I think what RP types view as "male disposability" is actually "lower class disposability", the tendency of the Upper classes to throw the lower class masses into fighting their wars. To respond to the "titanic scenario" The most common justification for the existence of male disposability. A scenario of a sinking ship with not enough lifeboats to hold all the passengers. Notice how its "women and children first" "Not women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 05:17 AM
1

It sounds cool go for it ; a Treatise
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 12:44 AM
3

Google the naturalistic fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 11:38 PM
2

"just be yourself" Isn't this BP claim up to interpretation and is heavily context dependent? If so then how does RP actually reject it? Does each user have a different rejection? or does the users just collectively pick an interpretation and move from there?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 10:12 PM
3

Flair your post a CMV OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 08:15 PM
5

You didn't explain the justification for why it is bad/negative
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 07:56 PM
0

After reading and hearing what he has to say about Marxism. I can only call him a sophist. Perhaps he is a good professor of psychology, but personally I think he should stick to his field.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 04:35 PM
3

"Its within women's inherent nature to be dishonest man, break free from your blue pill delusions and move on man" How good is my RP impression?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 05:44 AM
2

humpty-dumptyism Noun (uncountable) (idiomatic) The practice of insisting that a word or phrase means whatever one wishes it to. . Because if you take away a person's ability to attract mate you will get the exact opposite. The hidden premise being that being masculine is the only way to attract mates?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 12:56 AM
3

Men don’t cry 2. All men are dogs 3. Be a man 4. Real men finish last 5. Men will be men Are these the root of masculinity or merely a form a masculinity? Does the sum of this equal masculinity? Until I can really answer these questions my response will be of subjective opinion. But I'll answer anyway. should we be teaching young men to be masculine and stoic? First and foremost is to teach them to be functioning human beings of modern society, but second is to teach them to be "enlightened" I'm…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 12:38 AM
1

Fictitious and homosexual
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:28 PM
1

The "he took advantage of her" phenomena describes a certain social situation. Call it an umbrella term ment to apply to a specific group of social situations. However even within the umbrella term it is still extremely context dependant. It seems that you are generally trying to find a common theme within the umbrella term. From that theme derive conclusions about the term. However it seems you have snuck in the premise that women in this situation is being dishonest. How do you prove that all …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 06:26 PM
1

This is the eloquent philosophy I read at PPD. Your making waves in academia OP, your contributions will be right next to other philosophers like Timothy Dexter, Roosh V, Jordan B Peterson and that fucking loser who wrote Sword Art Online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 07:40 AM
2

The recent news Maybe you are right that we may be jumping the gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 04:41 AM
3

Just a quick question can a young man living in the US dodge a military draft? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 03:42 AM
2

I'm willing to see what user takes this bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 01:06 AM
2

Have you heard of the wonderbread guy? Hes infamous for having an incredibly convoluted and specific fetish. It makes me wonder how people with such fetishes develop them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 12:47 AM
2

I see most of feminism as sort of resting on 3 premises (key word MOST) Thus a rejection of these premises is how anti-feminism gets it philosophical footing. 1 That social arrangements among men and women are neither natural nor divinely determined. 2 That social arrangements among men and women favor men. 3 That there are collective actions that can and should be taken to transform these arrangements into more just and equitable arrangements, such as those in the timelines of woman's suffrage …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 11:46 PM
3

Did you pick out a single line from his post and use it to support your view? Your post is the textbook definition of cherry picking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:20 PM
1

I got that definition from the PPD wiki, does it need to be updated then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 06:52 PM
1

It's not the existence of hot milfs, it's the continued dating success of women past their 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 02:31 PM
3

Yes, the wall exists. And when you turn to nitpicking to prove it wrong, you have already lost the argument as it implies you have no better recourse than saying "bbbbbut there are hot 30 year-old women!" (no shit, to quote one of the most upvoted TRP posts on the wall, Being post-wall does not mean you are no longer attractive, hot, bangable or low SMV.) I will respond to thus part as the rest of the post reads like a string of random sentences with no real point. This is the PPD WIKI on the rp…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:24 AM
3

If mean if we switched the genders it prob just be looked at as any other infidelity case.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 04:51 AM
3

Your post reminds me of an anti suffragette poster Poster
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/20 06:10 PM
2

I'm pretty sure you can jerk off without looking at porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/20 04:25 AM
2

After hearing learning about Sigmund Freud I'm really doubting whether personal experience is a good falsifier to theories of human behavior. Especially after hearing why most people believe/disbelieve in TRP. They claim that TRP does/doesn't explain what they see in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 08:37 PM
1

No fries? Honestly that's the unbelievable part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 07:17 PM
1

Your squabble with westside was pretty entertaining ngl But yea I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 01:56 AM
2

Just trying to know the views of people who don't post. Although I understand it is kind of paradoxical to get get user who dont post to post their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 12:37 AM
1

ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:24 PM
1

as long as it is consensual. This is literally the problem with age gap relationships. You don't say "drunk driving is fine as along as long as the driver doesn't get into accidents".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:49 PM
2

incel-adjacent I think it means anything ideologically similar to incels/blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:33 PM
3

Hey im 18. That's all to the discussion that I am going to add.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:21 PM
1

If I define expendable per the google given definition of little significance when compared to an overall purpose and therefore able to be abandoned Then "expendable" isn't the right word to call it. It would add a new meaning to the phenomenon when there isn't any.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:19 PM
1

more capable and more expendable than you Where did you get expendable? For in this situation being expendable is irrelevant. Its only a matter of having the tools to solve certain problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 09:37 PM
1

If you remove the movement/philosophy from its context then you can definitely make some odd claims The RP is a pro men movement if I remove it from western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 08:35 PM
2

I'm pretty sure this is a CMV but But this is the first time I've seen someone reference goblin slayer in this sub. Whats next? A connection to how attack on titan is really a metaphor for feminism attacking tradition values? A connection to how sibyl from psycho pass is an example of a techno matriarchy? or how SAO is an incels dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 09:08 PM
1

Now that I think about it... If working from the premise that hypergamy is due to evolutionary causes. Then wouldn't it mean that women must be making judgments? From two potential mates, a women must catalog a list a behaviors and traits and social standing in order to determine who has greater "assets". From that list they make a judgement on who is better than the other? Those who made better judgments than others had greater success. Thus putting evolutionary pressure on woman to be "smart" …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 06:50 PM
1

Is this a woman's inherent value when removed from society? Or a woman's value to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 06:25 PM
2

Tickets cost $1,999 with a sale for $999? Only sold to women? This cant be real its to stupid to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 05:30 AM
3

TRP/TBP/PPD views are too different to intelligently speculate on the "reality" of normies. I view the description as evidence for the claim in the title. So I will respond to the title. If BP is defined as TRP defines it "The path of conformity with Society’s expectations" and normies as "A normal person; one with commonly held beliefs, tastes or interests" With commonly held beliefs and preferences are what make up societies expectations. Then it is literally impossible for BP and normies to n…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 04:07 AM
1

Thats why I included Judith Butler in the title, since she has heavily influenced 3rd wave feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:56 AM
1

Judith Butler. But to respond to your main "point". What do you think is the foundation for which feminist today base their views on? And if its some feminist ten years ago what do you think they based their views on?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:33 AM
5

I will treat this as a CMV and take the position of RP/MGTOW because its more interesting that way. Why do you think the term "pump and dump" exist? For men only really want women for sex. Certainly not for a relationship, as if they did the term would never come to fruition. Yes, men wanting to have sex with women is still "want". But a women to wanting to be in a relationship is also still "want". You have misinterpreted what the MGTOW folks are saying. They mean "want" as in wanting to be in …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:28 AM
2

bunch of old dead women dead cmon man can't you at least google search their names before making these claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:12 AM
1

purge is over
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 06:31 PM
3

Who was the best shitposter?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 06:13 PM
5

I know its a troll, but please don't take the communist manifesto as a complete book on communism. Das Kapital is the book you read if you want to understand Marxism and or communism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 06:12 PM
3

Jones covered a distance of 50 miles on his first trip. On a later trip he traveled 300 miles while going three times as fast. His new time compared with the old time was: (a) three times as much, (b) twice as much, (c) the same, (d) half as much, (e) a third as much
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:35 PM
2

Its the swirls in every bite of cinnamon toast crunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:09 PM
9

put camo in there too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:00 PM
1

10 + m(mm) m=2
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 08:31 AM
3

To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 07:36 AM
1

Anytime I need to see your face I just close my eyes And I am taken to a place Where your crystal minds and magenta feelings Take up shelter in the base of my spine Sweet like a chica cherry cola I don't need to try to explain I just hold on tight and If it happens again I may move so slightly to the arms And the lips and the face Of The Human Cannonball that I need to I want to Come stand a little bit closer Breathe in and get a bit higher You'll never know what hit you when I get to you Ooh I …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 07:30 AM
2

According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Ooh, black and yellow! Let's shake it up a little. Barry! Breakfast is ready! Ooming! Hang on a second. Hello? - Barry? - Adam? - Oan you believe this is happening? - I can't. I'll pick you up. Loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 07:26 AM
0

私のペニスを少し愚かな雌犬を吸います。大規模なダンプを取って見下ろすと、あなたの姿を思い出します。
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 07:09 AM
2

I'll be the roundabout The words will make you out 'n' out I spend the day your way Call it morning driving through the sound and In and out the valley The music dance and sing They make the children really ring I spend the day your way Call it morning driving through the sound and In and out the valley In and around the lake Mountains come out of the sky and they stand there One mile over we'll be there and we'll see you Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too Twenty four before my lov…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 07:03 AM
11

Ask your mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 06:54 AM
1

The nature of the "individual" is that it is in constant flux. The way it presents itself, is "character". Character only really ever changes after the individual has made drastic changes. Small change is lost within the transition to individual and character. A year ago you were a different person, a month ago you were still different, and a day ago you have still changed. To then feign change as "growth" an incomplete and naive notion. For there are two parts of growth; change and that this ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 06:53 AM
2

You watch boruto?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:44 AM
2

u/nwordcountbot /u/CamoWoobie420
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:30 AM
2

Whats the solution to my stage 3 pancreatic cancer?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:21 AM
11

I hate it when satire exaggerates.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:10 AM
2

-GERUNDAYO SMOKEY
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 05:03 AM
1

I
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:58 AM
1

N
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:58 AM
1

One, bluepillers almost NEVER post any studies(because there are almost no studies that support their nonsense) so quite the swing and a miss there. Two, what even is "evopsych" to you? EvoPsych is just a way of interpreting studies. Isn't blue pill also just a way of interpreting studies? Also is red pill, I mean technically there isn't any study supporting any pill. Its all just "my interpretation is better than your interpretation"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:54 AM
1

I know this is kind of irrelevant, but when most rp'ers make post about "PPD women believe X" usually they don't provide any proof. I agree that both RP and BP should at the very least provide evidence when they make these types of claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:20 AM
1

Impact font.....
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:10 AM
1

No, Evo psych is an attempt to explain regular psych using evolutionary terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 04:07 AM
21

Damn women ruining pornhub. If women were gone pornhub would be so much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:58 AM
15

Maybe because she thought he was one thing when getting to know him and when she gets further into the relationship he is in fact, another thing. So I guess 1?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:55 AM
8

Call me an adjective again and I will PM you the entire bee movie script.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:53 AM
1

If I get accepted into art school then yes, if not no
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:50 AM
3

No, I was asking /u/FakeDrsfacts
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:44 AM
2

Are you capable of rational thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:43 AM
4

Kind of reminds me chris chan. I really see her(her=he) as living and breathing trans boogeyman that the conservatives have been whining about ever since the whole concept of transgender have entered the public eye. I honestly don't know what to make of her. There is sooooo many controversies around this single person that all I can really do is to label the sum of her character as "creepy". I'm not sure if she is a trans person who is perverted or one of the most elaborate trolls of the 21st ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:41 AM
3

Do you want me to PM you the entire bee movie script?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 03:33 AM
1

Is this after the AMA?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:50 AM
3

Here are my thoughts about your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:31 AM
1

Considering it, I just left high school in 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:03 AM
3

My most attractive trait is that I won a couple debate competition(congress) in high school. My most unattractive trait is that I won a couple debate competition(congress) in high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 01:01 AM
1

It that really the best insult you could come up with?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:57 AM
1

Is this your first time being in an open relationship? If so how different does it feel from a regular relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:36 AM
2

Mods please put your response as a reply to this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:24 AM
1

Have you ever introspected and looked back in your life to try and find the cause of your libido problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:24 AM
2

Honestly pontif curved sword is the only solo weapon that can ever be meta.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:17 AM
1

Did you both wanted it or did he have to convince you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:12 AM
2

How did you convince him to agree to an open relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:11 AM
-1

Could you name any sad subs? /r/IncelExit ? Mayber /r/ForeverAlone ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:09 AM
3

Where are you getting this data from?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:07 AM
1

Just watching 5 minutes of him and he seems to be not that different from any other anti-sjw youtuber.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/20 12:04 AM
4

BTW so far the best argument I have encountered for theism(by extension jesus) is Edward Feser's re framing and defense of the original Aristotelian "prime mover" argument. One of his books is also a nice read, although I disagree with every single sentence in that book. He also attempts to bridge the gap from deism to theism, although in my opinion it is a rather poor attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:58 PM
3

I don't think its to get off, but more of a way to turn the story into a tragedy, since women seem to like tragedy and sob stories more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:55 PM
1

I'm 18 Fight me
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:51 PM
2

Go for it if you have an immersion blender.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:49 PM
6

Ingredients 1/2 cup extra-virgin olive oil, divided 2 cloves garlic, grated on a microplane grater 1 small onion, finely sliced (about 1 cup) 1 teaspoon dried oregano 1/2 teaspoon red pepper flakes 2 slices white bread, crusts removed, torn into rough 1/2-inch pieces 2 (28-ounce) cans whole peeled tomatoes packed in juice Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper Minced chives, basil, or parsley as garnish Bread or grilled cheese for serving Directions Heat 2 tablespoons of olive oil in a larg…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:39 PM
22

All men desire anime titties and Jordan Peterson's literary critique
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:37 PM
1

lilith bad upvotes to the left
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:32 PM
0

Also no woe-is-me posts, you're banned" This is a purge pussy boy your gonna have to try harder than that, not that I had try to make your mom the happiest woman of 2019 :)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 11:29 PM
5

4/10 troll try harder next purge
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 10:36 PM
0

N
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 10:35 PM
2

Rich blue eyed busty blonde white women in supermarkets buying incredible amounts of overpriced wonder bread and filling their shopping carts with it while having a smug look on their faces. Google wonderbread guy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 09:31 PM
1

No I mean that the statement is self contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 09:27 PM
2

Your gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 09:26 PM
2

If I nothing matters, then your statement does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 09:23 PM
1

Most of them are in relationships I don't want any part in ruining their SO's.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 07:25 PM
1

existential comics?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 07:02 PM
1

Isn't interpretation an important factor when trying apply a scientific paper to your worldview?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:54 PM
2

Upvoted for remembering.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:42 PM
2

Attention! IT'S PUUUUUUURGE WEEEEEEEEEK Booyah. On New Years Eve there are no rules. (Well, there are still reddit wide rules. No Breaking THEM or the admins will fuck us up.) Otherwise go nuts. For a limited time THERE ARE NO RULES HERE Explanation of Purge Week
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:32 PM
3

For those unaware this is a reference to this squabble we had like 2 days ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/egwmri/from_an_evo_psych_perspective_beta_males_shouldnt/fcc9q7d/?context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:26 PM
6

This might be the single stupidest OP that I have ever seen on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:22 PM
3

lmao didnt this get deleted at the community chat
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:21 PM
1

1 What made you give up? ​Not much really, I never had any friends in school and the only people who could listen to me were my teachers. As far as any relationship with a female besides my mom I had absolutely none. Just from reading this sub and others I don't really think dating and LTR's are for me. I was always ok with living my whole life by myself, it hasn't killed me or given me cancer yet so I guess it isn't physically damaging. By that metric I could be considered and incel, but I neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 06:09 PM
2

Who is your favorite philosopher? W.V.O Quine and Kierkegaard for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 01:26 AM
1

and if I disagree with your definition of extreme, how would you go about showing me that I am wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 12:43 AM
1

Blue pill is extreme?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 12:37 AM
2

What do you make of this 2004 interview of Jean Baudrillard and his views on the matrix? http://postmoderndays.blogspot.com/2005/04/matrix-decoded-le-nouvel-observateur.html Most notably this response Baudrillard gives? Nouvel Observateur: The connection between the film and the vision you develop, for example, in The Perfect Crime, is, however, quite striking. In evoking a desert of the real, these totally virtualized spectral humans, who are no more than the energetic reserve of thinking objec…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 08:39 PM
2

I just realized how much Plato's allegory of the cave is sort of ingrained into the trp view of truth and the process of moving from falsity/simulation to truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 04:56 AM
1

Ok boomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 08:47 PM
3

Imagine getting so angry over a reddit post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 06:05 PM
5

I thought that alphas get the majority of women? Leaving only a small amount of inferior women to breed with any betas. Thus betas should be in the minority not the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 10:02 PM
1

NAFALT= A My claim= B If you agree that A and B are in fact equivalent then do you also agree that any arguments that use A as a premise, could be swapped with B and that argument would still be sound and valid? (A=B)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 06:40 AM
1

one person represents all of feminism Denying that one person can represent all of ideology X=/= Not all followers of ideology X are like that. The two are not equivalent claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:35 AM
1

Because one person represents all of feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:24 AM
1

who?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:20 AM
1

Nien
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 03:41 AM
1

Are hotdogs sandwiches? My friend says they aren't and we got into a really long argument about the nature of language and definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 03:33 AM
1

Yes and yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:42 AM
1

whatever society believes at the moment This is exactly why I call it "loosely defined" the cultural norm seems to be so heavily location dependent(E.g Middle eastern culture is very different from western culture) that to summarize it all together will only give you loose definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:36 AM
1

I mean that there are other forms of evidence that the soft sciences can offer that could mean whether it "supports" a pill ideology or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:31 AM
1

Establishing causation isn't the only form of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:21 AM
1

It would depend on how the person making the claim defined science. If claimant means that it is not supported by any of the hard sciences, then yes it is a poor argument. But the claimant means that it is not supported by any of the soft sciences then its merit on being a good or bad argument depends on whether the soft sciences does in fact support said pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:19 AM
1

Probably not, other posters have already posited that the pills are based on social sciences and share its nature with the social sciences. For the social sciences have already understand that this project, support it using current studies establishing causation Is not possible in this day and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:03 AM
1

I imagine it would be difficult to find any paper supporting blue pill ideology. This isn't because blue pill is wrong or anything but mostly due to blue pill being very loosely defined, being only what is the "norm". How do you find evidence for an ideology if you can't even define said ideology?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:34 PM
0

I guess you are not arguing in good faith are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:00 AM
-1

I am if I am starving. I think its a pretty simple to claim that most men are sexually starving, and thus are "desperate".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:34 AM
2

Men have much higher sex drives collectively than women can or will meet Men are not "desperate." If we define desperate as "suffering extreme need or anxiety." Then the former does not contradict the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:28 AM
3

Maybe I'm retarded but.. How do you get a user flair? I read the wiki and it says that there is a button on the home sidebar to click on but, I can't find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:20 AM
2

I got a strike for mentioning height as a factor Could you provide more context? Because RN there is not enough context for someone to draw any conclusions from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:06 AM
1

Your arguments are also invalid by the way, your conclusions do not follow from your premises. I have re examined my arguments and edited them to be (what I think is ) valid. Also would you say that this is a conclusion? Because women can protect you and it follows from this premise? When you take into consideration firearms exist
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 07:42 PM
1

That is a very good question.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:15 PM
2

Are you 1: Claiming that women do not uphold their part of the social contract? Or are you 2: Claiming that one ought to appreciate help when you receive it? Currently, men are not paid for it in any way That implies 1 and this So yes, it might be a good idea to thank the people willing to help you implies 2
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 07:49 AM
2

I guess since everybody is in disagreement I will play the devils advocate and articulate this post differently. Women have rights due to a social contract with men. Premise 1: Man have certain needs that women provide, in return men grant women rights and protection. Social contracts. Premise : 2 This is the nature of human power dynamics. Premise 3: One of these needs is for women to raise their children well. Premise 3.5: Women are far better at raising children than men are. Premise 4: Threa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:14 AM
3

I guess to articulate it a little better, women have rights due to a social contract with men. Premise 0: Man have certain needs that women provide, in return men grant women rights and protection. Social contracts. Premise 1: One of these needs is for women to raise their children well. Premise 2: Threats of death can only motivate a person to do so much. Raising a well adjusted child cannot be forced even if men have greater strength than women. Premise 3: Thus if men decide to not give women …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 05:59 AM
6

Real men watch My Little Pony, and read Jordan Peterson.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/19 02:29 AM
4

Look at any anime community.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/19 02:10 AM
3

None of them really deny that benevolent sexism, grants women special privileges; I.E men protecting women. Its just that the reason women have this privilege in the first place keeps women in oppressive roles. I.E men protecting women because they think women are incapable of protecting themselves. That is why they label it oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 06:02 AM
1

WTF? Calling Evolutionary psychology, one of the few sub fields in psychology grounded in BIOLOGY as "bogus".> All fields of psychology are grounded in biology, its just that evolutionary psychology seeks to explain that with evolutionary terms and under a evolutionary framework. Most criticism levied at the field are due to it not being falsifiable. I.E how do you scientifically prove that female hypergamy is due to women mating with higher status men secures safety for their children? At least…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/19 06:27 AM
2

So do critics of Evo Psych hurt the RP or can the RP by and large survive without Evo Psych?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/19 08:24 PM
0

Oh I am basing this off a critic of evo psych I read recently. Here it http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/ldc/GrayEP.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/19 08:09 PM
0

Does that make you a feminist then? Or do you not believe in class oppression?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 12:39 AM
3

In a debate about whether the oppression of men and women is equal. I define oppression as simply a culture and/or government denying choice to a certain group/race/class. Further oppression can be categorized into what group is being oppressed, and the reason they are being oppressed. So for male and female oppression to be called male/female oppression, they need to be oppressed for reason of being male/female. You seem to be citing class oppression, and calling that male oppression. In your e…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 12:27 AM
7

This may sound kinda weird but do we both have the same definition of "emotion"? Just so this debate can be on the same page. I am defining emotions with Wikipedia's definition: "Emotion is a mental state associated with the nervous system brought on by chemical changes variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure." In your example, “A triangle necessarily has 180 degrees” No emotion. While the statement is true from the perspective …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 03:55 AM
7

Call me crazy but isn't emotions, a part of logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 03:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter