beeuim Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Going Dutch on Dinner I already explained why this should be a LEGAL requirement ,not just an informal agreement between 2 parties. It would never work as an informal agreement for the same reason it wouldn't work in the job market. Are you so dumb as to believe that men would hire women who are unqualified just because the government suggested it would be a good idea to do so? Business is about making money. Women are a liability in the business world, that's why the government has to force men to hire women at lega…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 11:33 PM
-2	Going Dutch on Dinner Okay, the following seems to be the only part that is in any way related to dating: You're a complete fucking retard. This is the point we've been trying to make all along. And just like men are forced at legal gunpoint to hire women, women should also be forced at legal gunpoint to give up their dating advantage. That means women should be FORCED to pay their own way. It shouldn't just be a handshake agreement. Women don't accept handshake agreements that men will hire them. They want it in leg…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 10:15 PM
-1	Going Dutch on Dinner It was there before in long form in the other arguments already posted above. I just tried to make it SUPER SUPER SIMPLE FOR YOU by adding the edits.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 10:04 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner No it doesn't because men are FORCED AT LEGAL GUNPOINT to give women an advantage in the job market. But the same legal gunpoint doesn't apply to women. Nobody is forcing women to give up their natural advantage. So you're completely wrong here. Did you even read the argument above?	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 10:03 PM
0	Going Dutch on Dinner You're definitely an idiot and I've already shown how. SEE ABOVE.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 10:01 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner I don't see what this has to do with asking someone to go dutch before a date to make sure everything is clear. Yes. That's the point: you're a fucking idiot because you're too dumb to understand the argument. That's already been pointed out. As a fucking idiot, you should be busy trying to UNDERSTAND the argument rather than trying to dumb everyone else down. Try to read the arguments already presented. Try to grasp them first before you keep repeating your idiocy. Look, men and women both have…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 09:52 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner accepting reality? lol! no you're a fucking idiot because you can't understand a simple line of logic here: either BOTH sexes get to take advantage of their natural gender attributes or NEITHER gender gets to take advantage of their natural gender attributes. But you're a fucking idiot or a cowering white knight if you allow women to take advantage of theirs while hypocritically restricting men.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 09:49 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner Ok look, you're a fucking idiot. No wonder you don't get it. Can anybody explain this simple reasoning to this fucking moron?	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 08:19 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner no this is bullshit reasoning. this is like saying "whoever has the biggest muscles or the most brain power should get the job." but since men are LEGALLY prevented from taking advantage of their biology, women shouldn't be given special privileges in this regard either. They shouldn't be allowed to exploit their biological advantage if men are prevented from doing the same. In this case, it's biology for men to chase after women. Men naturally do the vast majority of the asking so this is a bul…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 07:31 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner Could you possibly be any dumber? What type of chick logic is that? Stay in school little girl.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 06:51 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner Don't be like a chick focusing on how someone argues. Worry about the actual substance of the argument.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 06:47 PM
7	Going Dutch on Dinner The truth is often harsh to those who haven't heard it and we have generalizations for a reason--they are generally true. If I go to 10 different women's magazines and find the advice I'm talking about--with very few women actively protesting that advice (and even more supporting it)--and if I have my own dating experience along with hearing from many other men in this arena to back me up, then I can safely make this generalization. I hate the knee-jerk tendency of most people to parrot the mind…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 05:06 PM
–	Going Dutch on Dinner except for romantic dates That's a BIG exception. And most women expect to be treated because they have the entitlement mentality of feminists. Sure there are women on here who always claim that they pay. But these women are completely ignorant of how dating works here. They have zero experience dating women, so they're talking out of their assholes. Most women expect a man to pay. Even those that claim they are for equality, when you ask them specifically about their dating habits you'll find t…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 04:49 PM