TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beleidigtewurst Archive

View 4 posts and 2,259 comments by beleidigtewurst on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,259 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

To me the whole "sexualize" concept is just a twist to sh*t on men. People get horny, people "sexualize" attractive people. Men tend to get horny more often than non-men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:13 AM
0

I'm so sorry yuou need to spin around basic facts so fiercly. Why is it so hard for you to accept that men are disadvantaged at tims? Q: Who has to register for the selective system? A: Almost all male US citizens and male immigrants, who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service. Q: Ok, what happens to the registered men, now that we know almost all male US citizens and even immigrants have to ergister? A: In a crisis requiring a draft, men would be called in a sequence…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:07 AM
1

Someone might feel insecure not because something is wrong with him/her/xim, but rather, because he/she/xim is facing threats he/she/xim cannot handle. Ever got to this idea? And in such cases "stop feelilng insecure" is not the cure. (stop feeling <whatever> is a dumb advise either way, as one need to be well into mediation/acting skills to be able to do that, and even then, it works only to an extent)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:02 AM
1

despite that entailing doing absolutely nothing after the initial paperwork. Unless scheisse gets hot and there is a need to send young men to war against their will.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:48 AM
0

It debunks young men in the US today who are trying to claim that they're under some special, onerous burden because of the draft. You mean unlike young women, who are somehow affected by the fact that centuy+ ago all men could vote for a handful years before all women could vote? But hilarious part is, just how wrong you are about today: The only requirement in the US today is filling out a form For what? Did you check what that form is filled for? Let me help you: It’s important to know that e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:42 AM
1

"Benevolent Racism" then. it's still bad It is absolutely not bad, from having privilege perspective, for the respective group. Just how defensive some get when painfully obvious female privilege is mentioned is peculiar. Another one is incoming in Germany. Of my two kids, only the son will have "duties" to be paid and will have to "serve the state" one way or anotehr. But no no, it's not "a women's privilege". Somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:25 AM
6

Volunteering is not the same thing It isn't. Volunteering means having a choice. A PRIVILEGE of choosing. While that other group has no choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:15 PM
4

Which is worse? Benevolent sexism is a joke compared to hostile sexism. "Benevolent sexism" is a negative spin to female privilege. E.g. this is "a benevolent sexism": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect The same sort of findings, when applied to races, not genders, is used to claim white privilege and black oppression. We should call it "benevolent sexism against white" instead
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:12 PM
1

And that somehow "debunks" anything in your peculiar opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:10 PM
5

I want to be considered worth conscripting. Which part of "Women volunteers have been enlisting to serve in the US armed forces since 1917." did you miss? Germany is about to start forcing young men to serve in army. Exactly 0 feminist groups will note how sexist that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:10 PM
2

"Prejudice" simply means to pre-judge someone I'm sorry, what does this deflection have to do with the OP that talks about privilege? prejudice because it's easy It is absolutely the same experiment as with racism Except this time it is sexism. And it is in female favor. So, you were spinning?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:08 PM
1

are simply insecure Yes, and so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:06 PM
2

I'm surprised she even got prison sentence.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 12:20 PM
7

Some do, some don’t. There is just different "like"-s here. Do men find aggressively (in female terms) dressed women more sexually attractive? You bet. Does it have implications for LTR, up to "I'd rather she would not"? You bet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:34 AM
2

The only "problem with dating" is that men want to bang bang 10x times more often than women. Because parental investment of minutes vs months.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:39 AM
3

People overestimate what some political groups "achieve". Times change, technology brings more options (like not having to raise very heavy scheisse at work) and society changes accordingly. And to all the dumdums who think women started working not so long ago, because something something US: both men and women HAD to work for most of our history. It is NOT WORKING that was a privilege. Even kids had to work. And then there are instincts that do not change as quicklky as technology. And there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:26 PM
1

You absolutely meant that they've "made" changes and I had to point out that most of such claims are baseless. As for the rest of your post, it stands only when taking strawmen in #3 seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:33 AM
0

For starters "F-ism" as a single body never existed. And then "advocating" for things and DELIVERING things are two very drasticlly dfferent claims. People, women AND MEN got universal voting rights about 100-150 years ago. In some countries men got them a bit earlier, in some at the same time, in rare cases even later. The entitled group of the racist anglo-saxon women had little to nothing to do with it. As with slavery. 170 years ago imperial Russia had serfdom, a form of it. Otoman empire ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:27 AM
-3

Feminists advocated for women being able to vote, own property, work, and own land. Yeah, nah. F-s claimed to have delivered it, which is an obvious lie. 3 looks like a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:20 PM
1

Why do people sound as if number of single men differs from the number of single women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:32 PM
0

Hell they do.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 09:40 PM
13

Yep. No shooting needed for that to happen either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:07 PM
–

Yeah. And "equality" means they gotta retire 5 earlier than men. Figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:08 PM
–

but no attempt to address unfairness because the thought of men committing a crime is far scarier. Oh, you think that is the reason? What was the reason to send men to deal with Fukushima disaster? When testing female only (!) drugs, after testing them on mice, dogs, monkeys, we test them... wait for it... on men. I think many still hold the view that women are the "fairer sex" that are in need of protecting It's not just "view": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect The term …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 06:26 PM
–

Accepting that there are areas men are disadvantaged, means accepting that there are areas that women have privileges, this explodes entire opression industry, that gets literal billions from the governments across the globe. The fun fact: despite men being more likely to get prison sentence for the same crime and getting on average 1.6 times longer sentences, UK has an organization looking how to improve things for women getting imprisoned. UK female group protesting aginst equal retirement age…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:45 PM
1

No, as the high body count is a dumb strategy for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 03:18 PM
2

How could there be "lonely men pandemic" without "lonely women pandemic"? Are "surplus" ladies going lesbian?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 03:14 PM
2

"Wokism" is about helping male humans, really? I might be reading the "OMG 1 in 4 homeless are women!!!" texts wrnog.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:41 AM
1

Getting good genes is the appeal. Which makes a lot of sense to specifically female part of our species to cafer about, given how we reproduce. For men, it's more about quantity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:29 PM
1

Pay gap is BS anyhow. I outearn my spouse (and that is the cases for all of our friends), but guess who spends more on themselves. Married men make 30% more than single ones. Married women, on the opposite, start to earn less, up to not working at all (the higher the husbands income, the bigger the post-marital drop) It's a misread stat to push someone's agenda, not a real issue. When buisnesses can hire certain group of people for less, they do. (e.g. construction workers in Germany eagerly hir…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 09:46 AM
1

Lol, only in TV series.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 09:19 PM
1

Yeah. Except. There is a reason any, not to unhealthy woman can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual partner. Monumental parental investment gaps: minutes on male side and months-into-years no female side is what drives the gender ratios. Absolutely nothing "absurd" about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 07:06 PM
2

Perhaps Kramer vs Kramer
/r/MensRights17/12/24 09:28 AM
0

like males are intrinsically bad fathers That's one silly take on a simple fact. Consequences of SnuSnu for 2 genders: Males: several minutes and I might parent a child that I or someone else might raise. Females: I might end up with someone living in my body and then outside for 9+ month and god knows if that guy will even stand with me.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:14 PM
-3

That is bollocks stats. do significantly more women have BFs? I don't get how this NONSENSE fits in people's brains. We have rough parity of number of women/men. How on freaking planet Earth could there be a difference in a number of HETEROSEXUAL "mating"? You are mistaking it for sex. Well, in case of sex, men have higher libido. Most women abstain as they don't want to do it unless a-b-c, some of them go swim in penises (which doesn't make them happy). Female parental investment of our species…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 08:53 PM
1

"as well as range of controlling behavior", rich.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:39 PM
3

How many of them are divorced? And how many are widows?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:05 PM
1

Let's create male version of grievance studies and then have the best of the f*cks on both sides have a deathmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:53 PM
–

No, I mean you are making things up. You can go there and post your opinion, no matter how controversial. Banning for it is very (US) "liberal" and is not how things work there. menslib is feminazi (a word coined by a feminist, mind you) run, with all the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:16 PM
3

You've just replied to an OP who used a straw man to claim "men are bad".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:22 PM
2

The conservative subs and mens subs ban people right and left too Oh PLEASE, what should I post on a men's sub to get banned pretty please? And i mean actual men's sub, not that 'menslib' feminist bazinga.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:17 PM
2

It might well be, but I've never been banned by them, unlike that other 'tolerant' side. I consider myself liberal (heck I vote for liberal democrats in Germany). It's just US "liberalism" of today has nothing to do with my take on liberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:15 PM
3

Or, you know, the movement itself is rotten.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:40 PM
16

This is the nature of Reddit in general. No, not at all. Silencing dissent is very "US liberal" approach to things, that had shocked me first... about a decade ago, I think. (I was actually on liberal, not conservative side of things, mind you) Conservative dumbos would pile on, but I don't recall being banned by them a single time. "Libs" banned me for not wishing Mitchel (US congress) death as he is a staunch supporter of Ukraine. This actually is USSR levels of intolerance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:39 PM
11

I love how you folks pretend it's not "real" feminists who do that. Name a feminist who condemned Amber Heard after overwhelming evidence broke out.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:36 PM
7

Are there any nontoxic feminist subs? I've chuckled. On a serious note, equity feminists exist (e.g. Kathy Young), but are not even 0.1% of the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:34 PM
8

Even most feminists get banned from subs like r / feminism. They have been notoriously taken over by bad narrow minded actors. Well, seen with my naked eyes, Feminist debate quite resembled girl on girl bullying from early days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_sex_wars It is also quite visible in how debates go. E.g. Zizek vs Peterson as opposed to C. Sommers vs R. Gay. (pathetic personal attacks).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:32 PM
4

Feminist theories are often just random thoughts that actually fail to describe reality. E.g. "women don't do math, cause patriarchy" (claim) vs reality of Saudi Arabia and Iran having more women in STEM than Sweden. (among many others) "Women are unrepresented in Orchestras because sexism!" claim vs reality of auditions actually being blind. If you don't silence critics, it will fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:29 PM
1

If you wonder, what moving goalposts are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 01:43 PM
1

I have no conditions That is not how risks work, naïve stranger. My grandfather drunk wine a lot, yet lived into his late 80s. That doesn't make drinking lots of wine a healthy habbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 09:37 AM
1

Polygamy is religious Polygamy is how our species functioned for most of its history. There are two times more women, than men, among our ancestors. There were periods of history when difference was two digit. quite a few men willingly abandon their kids You don't get a point, do you? It's about having kids at all. When they exist, for some, it might be the better strategy to seek more women and have even more kids, instead of looking a handful available.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 09:34 AM
2

Good to see health experds posting on PPD and sharing their amazing knowledge for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 07:36 AM
-1

Men lie, manipulate and rape, steal and have a STRONG desire to hurt people. Some quality men hating nonsense on PPD, color me surprised. Even "manipulate and lie" more than women huh? Amazing shit. As for rapes, you may want to check this (expanding definition to claim bigger numbers has... consequences): https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html Number of male victims of heterosexual rape (in its wider definition that includes having sex, when one…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:58 AM
-1

This is absolute nonsense. Men who say that are actually insulting and degrading MEN Or know basic effing biology. Like "who can end up raising someone else's child".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:55 AM
4

I prefer to harness Note ejaculating for prolonged periods (2+ weeks) has significant risks for men's health, per Men's Health.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:48 AM
2

ethically polyamorous You mean polygamous? Polyamorous has that pesky aspect of not knowing who's kids one is bringing up. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:47 AM
2

Certainly not all men would make the same choice. Let me start with "some men have two penises" (literally). So, yeeah, some very special unusual type of men does exist. Although in a very small number, I suspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:45 AM
2

Not all men are so depraved that they want sex without committed Women should tone down arrogance and stop pretending that not seeing things their way is somehow flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:43 AM
2

I’m speaking for all men, if they could have casual sex with endless beautiful women, they would Well, yes, but heterosexual/bi-sexual men. Gays don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:42 AM
3

I value my perception of women Rational part of the brain is pretty useless, when discussing things like wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:42 AM
7

Successful, well-respect men place more value in the quality As demonstrated by what exactly? The more successful men, e.g. celebrities of all kinds, sticking more with a single female partner? Oh, wait a second, are you from planet Earth?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:41 AM
3

The read more as desperate addicts Sure, John, primate males of specifically homo sapiens branch having high libido is "pathological". Why of course. How people get such ideas is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:39 AM
–

Heck, queer women have more casual sex than straight men do. (less than gay men, but not by much) More than a half of lesbians after 2 years in relationship bang LESS THAN once a month. To say gays have more sex is an understatement of the year.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:38 AM
1

I mean, that's exactly what they're gonna end up having Yeah. Although, there is that "sex worker" industry that I was told is older than Athens and Babylon.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 11:37 AM
5

If someone makes the claim that statistically only 2% of accusations are proven It's a lie regardless, 2% came from no credible study ever, it's an old lie and I've posted a link to the paper who chased it 20 years ago, when it first appeared. Oh, and the bonus? The intent to make rape a strict liability offense. Guess what Sweden just did.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:24 PM
1

Fuck video, look at this paper that actually tracked the lie down to its source back in 2000 (referenced once by Cathy Young) The Truth behind Legal Dominance Feminism's Two Percent False Rape Claim Figure By Edward Greer. source
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:23 PM
-1

20s women saying they hate old men Never seen b*tching of that kind. A close to 40 women complaining about only too young or "very old" showing interest in them, yeah, actually have seen those. On Twitter. Are there bitter old women who judge, I want to point out that the bitter age starts rather early in this case. At around 40-ish, sometimes earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:21 PM
2

Weird. My dad wouldn’t be happy if I was dating a man Your dad wouldn't be too happy with most of the men you'd be dating. However, no other men would give a flying F. See the difference? Your dad is just one guy who cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:18 PM
0

force people or society at large Yeah. Except, whiny types on social media/feminazi journals are not really "society at large".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:18 PM
2

Note how they are fine AND EVEN PROMOTE granny + young man. (e.g. "Umbrella Academy", "Ozark"). So it's a problem only when men are older. Which is, because, you know, female butthurt over gender aging differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:17 PM
–

Human instincts do not change over mere decades. And if we could control our instincts, losing weight would be an easy thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 06:33 PM
1

guys look like shit 6.9% of US men are morbidly obese. So, hell yeah. On the other hand, 11.4% of US women are morbidly obese. So you were saying? Women underestimate own attractiveness. Just because a guy would plug a dick into someone when sexually starved, doesn't mean he finds that someone attractive. (dick is a b*tch) Not so hot women do experience "wait, why doesn't he have a strong erection" gotcha's with chads. That is why, folks. otherwise yall would be laid consistently Lol, no, that's…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 07:33 AM
1

A lot of women don’t even want kids Define "a lot". Also, the age matters. The only cases of "we don't want" that I have seen personally, were concealed "and actually we can't have kids". Fertility issues are more common than people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 07:27 AM
1

I don't grasp the meaning of your question. It's like "should people be only heterosexual". We are the way we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 07:39 PM
2

Should from which perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 06:17 PM
2

I haven't seen a single one that wasn't. The one that semi-wasn't was very involved with the kids of her sister.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 06:10 PM
38

Accept as in "to fuck". Accept as in "to have a family" Are two very different "accepts" that also happen to be very VERY different across genders. The veiled "but dude would fuck even not that attractive woman... why don't they use this opportunity" is hilarious to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 05:57 PM
1

The study finding was 20-23, rendering the silly "the lowest possible" moot. I'm OK with repeating that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 05:37 PM
1

If they were at their peak age we would be in their bedrooms. As if "we" were not and if this very topic wasn't about b*tching about that, lol. and there is a plenty of hollywood actresses who look good in their 40s There is a handful. While nearly all men who were handsome when younger, still roll. most of you guys are ugly even I was about to object, but then, I have no idea in which, possibly terrible, place you live, so, hell, sorry to hear you live in such a hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 04:41 PM
1

I have seen a study that showed men found 20 yr olds most attractive 20-23. So, yeah. I'm so sorry reality doesn't align with your fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 04:28 PM
1

Men don't need any excusing, entitled one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 04:22 PM
2

Ok, so, I'll take that the answers are: Q: So can you provide A SINGLE article b*tching about older women younger men situations, calling women "pedos" or shaming them some other way? No. Q: Do you have what it takes to admit it? Also no.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 06:25 PM
2

want to disregard father's opinion Yes. because they are men No, because "they" are single person. Had it been other fathers too, you could see "men" writing articles about it. women that you hate so much Yeah. are not mothers In other words, I don't hate mothers. That's cool. Could we switch from your weird ideas about me back to the subject? Or have been in abusive situations Oppression Olympics Alert: damsel is in distress, DO SOMETHING!* *this distress signal is related to the established my…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 05:43 PM
1

I bet if an 18 y/o brings her 30 y/o boyfriend, her father is not going to like it And will write a letter telling us how he disapproves it. Unlike mother? Anyway. Yeah. Other fathers won't. I don't think it's wise to mix parents into this. Parents can protest against their offspring choices for countless reasons. Else you wouldn't have an issue finding angry father's article about how 45 years old women dating 20 years old men are "pedos" and "disgusting".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:45 PM
1

If someone tells me they drive a red car and I’ve seen their red car, I can say “that person drives a red car” You can say "I've seen person X driving a red car". That is your opinion. If a person tells you, xe drives a read car, it's something different. Then you can ay "I think xe rides a red car, since xe told me so". You can also talk about "a friend of mine told me"-s all day long. Anecdotal evidence is shit, but you do have right to push it. What you cannot do is: find a group with the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:42 PM
1

I can speak for my experiences and those of my peer group. No. You can speak for your experience. And you can share WHAT, IN YOUR OPINION experience of some group is. You can not speak on behalf of that group. experiences of women Oppression Olympics Alert: damsels are in distress, everyone, DO SOMETHING!!! You’re being purposefully obtuse. Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:22 PM
1

approach them. You are again switching the subject. It is not about "approaching". It is about such mating being "immoral" because "pedophilia". I do think that the issue is mostly about approaching. And that is fine by me. Just has nothing to do with the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:10 PM
0

OP said “women” Yes. as in speaking for No. about women. Yes. As in what he/she/xim sees (something xim can claim zimself) vs what others see (something that others should state). You weren’t too bright in school I was. Also in the university and at work. I'm sorry if reading it somehow hurts you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:08 PM
0

most people understand the term Amazing stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:06 PM
1

while older women are commonly referred to as cougars—a term that implies a predatory nature Yeah yeah, it's a derogatory term, right? So dishonest... bias against woman-older age A single article pretty please. Uno. Ein. ერთი. Not an article that would b*tch about "poah womxn", no. Those are available in abundance. Our species is that way, "damsel in distress" works and damsels scan for reasons to "distress". Find a SINGLE ARTICLE condemning older women for having relationships with ADULT young…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 04:05 PM
2

younger women are bothered when older men approach them repeatedly Uh, everyone is bothered when unwanted advances are made. This, however, is not the subject here. OP is about "pedophilia b*tching" when out there somewhere there is a couple and one part of that couple is much older and that older part is a man. (in that very combination only, if you reverse genders it is totally fine)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 02:57 PM
1

40% of infertility is caused by men NICH puts that at "third" for US. And we are talking about a country with 6.9% of men (and 11.4% of women) being morbidly obese... Has little to do with men's age regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 02:02 PM
1

When I’m 33, I will date a man around that age. When you are any age, feel free to date men of any age, within legal framework. It is nobodies efing business. old who hits on me is pathetic. Don't date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:36 PM
1

You weren't too bright at school, were you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:34 PM
1

women of that age prefer men their own age No. Own age +2-3 years. And "prefer" as in "find most attractive". Up to 45, when it is just "my age". It goes "a bit below my age" at 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:33 PM
–

Did you ask OP this same question? OP did not use "we" pronoun, nor shared anything but OWN experience, unlike you. Men shaming for "isn't she too young for you" is everywhere, including comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:26 PM
1

They weren’t about DiCaprio, they reference him Eh. There are issues on both sides of the age gap. There are no issues on either side of the age gap. We have a concept of 'adult people' exactly to distinguish between underage and grown ups. There is nothing, but butthurt behind b*tching about "younger women older men". It is also highly hypocritical and Ulrika Jonnsonn is by no way an exception. The same people who b*tch about DiCaprio embrace granny + young men in the movies. (for what I could …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:20 PM
2

significant hair loss by age 40 It is higher, not lower testosterone levels that lead to hair loss, desperate stranger. Testosterone produces a hormone called dihydrotestosterone which is responsible for balding. Sperm quality starts declining at 35. I think you might be getting somewhere. Oh, wait, wait, and you know for how long men can be fertile? Quite well into 70s and beyond. Now live with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:07 PM
1

Explain one woman’s perspective Yes please. use your one example I am lost on why posts linking to b*tching Di Caprio age are somehow relevant. You mean we cannot catch ALL women butthurt about aging gap demonstrate their hypocrisy? Yeah, we can't. What we can do, though, is note how frequently we are presented with granny + young men couples in the recent series. Ozark? (some really creepy shit) Emily in Paris (ok, at least she's not creepy) Umbrella Academy? If it helps, I can pretend it has n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:04 PM
1

As evidenced by... ah, right, your post. Ok. Average age of Mr Olympia is 33.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:56 PM
–

Did "enough women" somehow vouch for your right to speak in their name or are you more of a self declared "we"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:54 PM
3

Young and fit and healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:27 PM
3

LOL no chance Shawn Rhoden won Mr Olympia when he was 43. "Max" age to start bodybuilding and aim for championship, per Joe Wader, is 33. So, yeah. "buh testosterone". Let me examine that though: testosterone starts declining Significantly only after, hold your breath, age of about 80. Now live with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:27 PM
1

just jumble numbers around! 21 is 12 backwards Oh, now I get it too. Thanks for pointing out. Sorta "logical"... :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:19 PM
0

Its an actual term. It is a blatantly sexist term used by professional oppression charlatans to bash men. It is simply insane that nonsense of such magnitude sticks. The whole point of the OP is calling that BS out. You sound like Tate Maybe you should not watch him so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 12:17 PM
6

fertility argument is used as if men are known for wanting to settle down There is no connection. Or maybe there is. Regardless, it has nothing to do with the argument. As if they just look at a woman, and magically detect her fertility levels lol Health and youth are "magical", only trained magicians of Planet Earth can detect them. Right? It's not about fertility Men of all ages pick women aged 20-23 as most attractive. That also happens to be peak fertility age for women. These are facts. As …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:49 AM
1

That would be relative to my own age Sorry, I've missed on whether it is "yes" or "no".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:45 AM
9

People? It is specifically women. And it is specifically when it is men who are older. Or could someone, please, find an article condemning an old lady for mating with younger men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:36 AM
0

So is the "pedo" shaming about men who simply do not exist? Why complain about non-existing couples?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:34 AM
2

Yeah it does. Why do men twice my age and ugly as sin think I care Why do you think any men cares about specifically you? If men weren't able to find much younger female mates, this very conversation would not even exist. You (or anyone else, including myself) personally have nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:33 AM
1

a guy in his early 20s What about a guy in his mid 30s? Maybe early 40? Somehow 25 is "a pedo" age?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:32 AM
–

We weren’t fucking older men. I am sorry is "we" your pronoun? Or are you referring to yourself in plural?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:31 AM
2

40 year old women remember how gross it felt to be 18 and pursued by men old enough to be our dads. Oh, that's what it is? Explain this pretty please. To me it looks more like she remembers how much more attractive she felt, when she was younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:30 AM
2

a forty year old man needs to poop, or if he has a tummy ache or a bad knee. A healthy men is at peak form aged 35-40.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:29 AM
-1

Don't stop there. You can go further. If picking up random irrelevant (and batshit crazy) numbers, why not go as low as 3&4? Heck, what about 1&2?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:29 AM
0

Unhealthy? I'm not the one hitting on literal children Essentially you are demonstrating "outrage" over accusation that exists just in your imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:28 AM
-4

Probably because they know they are attracted to much younger than that too. That contradicts data at hand, showing that 20-23 is where men look. (also the peak fertility age) It is a stronger way to shame men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:27 AM
4

young adults are still forming as people That is why we refer to them as not adults. And now some women come up with hilarious idea of "not quite adults". I find it hypocritical and just a cover for aging gap insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:26 AM
2

old men approaching me You don't really perceive men aged 35-40 as "old" or do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:24 AM
4

Most younger women are not attracted to older men and are annoyed when repeatedly approached by them. That's pretty much where it comes from. It is older women who whine about that the most. So, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:23 AM
12

I think what men call a "biological imperative" is just men being creepy Yeah, that's a lovely angle to "why do men find women at peak fertility age most attractive" debate. I would call it manipulative and insecure. Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:23 AM
0

men, read this and stop playing victim. Read: "men of all ages find women aged 20-23 to be most attractive". Then read this: "20-23 is peak female fertility age". And stop blaming mother nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:20 AM
6

It's funny to me, a lot of people push that "you go girl" empowerment mantra when a woman wants to: join the military, get into crippling debt to get a diploma, vote in national elections, open an onlyfans, do sex work, etc... but the moment she wants to have sex with an older man the "she is still a child" excuses begin. Note how the other way around is tally fine. Examples: "Emily in Paris", "Umbrella Academy".There are many more series with that stuff, but I haven't watched them (found them b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:19 AM
2

Female butthurt about gender gap in aging. And I have a lovely instance demonstrating just how hypocritical some ladies are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:16 AM
1

i can literally find 10 of her at any grocery store ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 07:49 AM
1

So, who's actually average then lol? OH, sorry, I didn't make it clear. Of course average men (by normal definition of average) are average. It's just hilarious that women find them to be "below". And we must take into account two important points here: 1) It is specifically okcupid men 2) It is specifically okcupid women They might or might not (I tend to think not) reflect "men" and "women" in general that well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 07:01 PM
1

Ask them to show how existing system (that, per patriarchy theory, was created for male benefit) benefits men. If they insist it doesn't, ask them how come that men are privileged then.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 06:55 PM
0

I could claim red is blue. Oh, no spinning please. Don't mix changing THE FACT (something rather obviously wrong) with changing the THEORY behind why the fact has happened. generally considered toxic masculinity A term has been coined by a bunch of sexist human garbage who outright hate men and don't even hide it. Just because oppression charlatans have successfully repeated something, it does not become true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:19 PM
1

You mean the smoking hot model with beautiful face, perfect shape and ideal skin? No, I'm pretty sure not even 1 in 1000 of women you'd see at the beach can boast that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:16 PM
1

But how do you know that average men only find average women "fuckable" and not attractive enough for a relationship? I don't recall saying anything about "for relationship". But then, men are into "relationships" out of necessity, which, naturally, means it's a compromise. Is there anything that indicates this or are you just project? Ironic. Why would we do that when the topic is average men? Reading comprehension issues, I guess. So, majority of okcupid women, find OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:05 PM
0

Toxic masculinity is masculinity to the extremes. One can pick up any random thing and claim it is <insert gender> to the extreme, or am I missing something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:00 PM
2

Then what are we talking about here? Fantasies You struggling with "f*ckable" not necessarily meaning attractive. I don't get what is so hard there to grasp. Heterosexual men in prisons f*ck other men. Not because they are "attractive", but because that's a way to get relieve. that data was subjective Oh boy... Anyway, my (joking) point was, we should talk about "below average" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:13 PM
-1

I assumed "women are not attracted" was the starting point, but if you need to repeat that, go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 06:27 PM
2

For the most part fuckable and attractive are synonymous. Then explain the "would f*ck, but would try to hide it" phenomena, pretty please. Or rather ugly sex dolls. I guess they are "attractive" eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 06:22 PM
1

It doesn't matter what one is "aiming for". Besides, one could be average on looks, but not so average on income. And, haha, 80%+ men are 'below average', per okcupid data.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 06:15 PM
56

This is the stuff! We need more of it. God bless you!
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:59 PM
4

The average man is attracted to the average woman Wrong. Finds average woman merely f*ckable. Would insta-dump "average women" for the likes of this. average woman is not attracted Yeah, you can word it that way. But you can also say "average woman has a much lower sex drive than an average man" (as consequences of sex are monumentally different across genders).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:22 PM
30

She faces up to 30 years in prison. Surprisingly adequate.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:50 PM
20

Where that shit is coming from (actually there were earlier ideas by "radical feminists", the SM just wrote them down and read): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart#Writing
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:33 AM
3

Puberty period starts earlier. Women are less likely to be carried away by imagination is my personal anecdote, although, with many instances. Being naturally risk averse (unlike men, women never had "the winner takes it all' period) also makes them more mature.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:16 AM
13

"toxically masculine" You are buying propaganda piece. That's not very smart. People of both genders can be toxic in quite unique ways. It takes a sexist human garbage to project it to entire gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 09:15 AM
1

There isn't any. (the reverse is not true, e.g. deciding "I am not ready to become a parent") But reality has never stopped oppression charlatans. I mean, heck, we have "marches for equality" in all seriousness.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:13 AM
2

I am not on that platform. Twitter perhaps?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:12 AM
25

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/14/study-finds-surprisingly-that-women-are-favored-for-jobs-in-stem/ https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888 And I find it crazy how we swallow NOT preferring people based on their gender as "worse" outcome.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 07:05 PM
54

God bless the creator of this. Amazing stuff.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 07:02 PM
0

Takes on beauty, with small variations, being largely the same for all humans is how we have the concept AT ALL. Hence, of course one can judge own attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 06:26 PM
0

Jordan Peterson and a lot of other men's issues advocates are calling for separate schools for boys and girls. My boss is an Indian woman (and she's great). She says she regretted going to separate gender school, as it greatly affects you at how you can interact with the other gender. If you remember shy Indian in "Big Bang Theory", that's based on reality. So, well, there are ups, perhaps, but there are downs too.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 06:20 PM
2

A man who raises kids that aren’t his especially in the contexts you described is honourable As is the men who sacrifices own life for the goods of the tribe. That sort of shameless reasoning ("but he's a hero") is successfully used by most societies for millennia.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 06:14 PM
23

But but but it's less than 5% I know you are joking, but two links everyone in this sub must have, IMO: The Truth behind Legal Dominance Feminism's Two Percent False Rape Claim Figure <= a chase of "where the heck did the 2% figure come from" from back 2001. Oh, predicted that they will make sex strict liability offense (already a law in scandinavia). Long story short, it was essentially made up. Viral 'false accusation' pic scoring three out of five Pinoccio in Washington Post fact checker as a…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:06 PM
12

One of the most outrageous cases, where falsely accused had AUDIO RECORDINGS but was still kicked out. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/columbia-sexual-assault.html
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:03 PM
0

173cm is not that short though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 04:01 PM
2

We are social animals, it is normal. And look at @Notch. (Minecraft creator, self made billionaire from a poor family)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 05:32 PM
27

But but but that’s just something evil men do isn’t it? You are sarcastic, but if you think, this won't give some people idea that "but if they didn't decide to take custody away, she would not do it, let's protect women MOAR", you are way way less cynical than me.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 05:04 PM
3

It's a lie by the same folks who tell you that high age gap leads to much higher divorce rates. (it does not)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 04:53 PM
4

There is a good reason for women to avoid men which are too sexual, because there is a higher chance they will just use her for sex Yes, and "too" is simply redundant here. There is no good reason for women to mate with men who simply want to bang them. That is why 'commitment' is such a thing (and also why it is so one sided).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 11:15 AM
2

Sure but if more women are dating eachother than men are dating each other It would, except it is the other way around, more gays are dating than lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 08:19 AM
4

There are good reasons for men to avoid women that are too open for sex, as they might end up raising somebody else's children. It's not a "double standard" since that doesn't work the same way with genders swapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:59 AM
4

Except both slut shaming and virgin shaming is done by men. Except it's bovine feces. Exhibit A (a study) and B (a wiki page describing the full arsenal of female vs female competition).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:59 AM
17

Slut shaming is a double standard It's not a double standard due to major differences between genders. weaponized against wome By other women as studies show Female Intrasexual Competition
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:57 AM
0

Lack of sexual discretion is unattractive in general. That's the standard for all genders. There is a gargantuan parental investment gap. (minutes on male side, years on female) Which lead to any, not too unhealthy looking, female humans being able to walk into a bar and get out with a willing sex partner. It is a very very VERY low hanging fruit for women. Hence it's not "the same". For the other gender it is very easy too... stay virgin. Something men get shamed for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:56 AM
0

I’m literally stating the breakdown Aren't you clamping 2 different age groups together? stubborn reluctance to even accept the facts I'm absolutely lost on how to stay sane with how figures that you have shared align with OP claims like "70% of women are in a relationship but only 30% of men are". Do you admit, based on the data for this age group, more men in this age group are single vs women? It’s a yes or no question Yes, there are age groups where more men are single and age groups where m…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 07:13 AM
0

Because it’s skewed by men and women who aren’t as sexually active (e.g. > 75 in age) Of 350 million people living in the US, less than 23 million (6%) are > 75 in age. You mention 18-49 age group, but you cannot simply average over different age spans like that. does your bias blind you Of course. I mean, isn't that the very definition of bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 07:28 PM
-2

Like the breakdown is literally in the link in the graph. Well, you know, men 31, women 31 is quite on the point eh? Especially given the question asked in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 07:17 PM
2

It was a recent pew poll. See here: I see: Men: 31 Women: 31 Basically, in my interpretation, it confirms... Dude, get the facts straight first...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 04:31 PM
2

Rape is a type of sexual assault, it is not a synonym of sexual assault. That is very convenient. The rest is you struggling with something as simple as "perpetrator does not need to penetrate, to be a rapist".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 04:12 PM
1

Women commit 80% of sexual assaults against men. "buh they cannot penetrate with vaginas!" They can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:33 PM
1

Where is this in your source?!? While commenting on a text with hyperlink in it. Amazing shit. Hypocrisy can get you THAT far. This 79% only refers to men who were made to penetrate others, excluding men who were penetrated. So kind of their female rapists not to have penetrated them with vaginas.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:13 PM
1

all those men are raped by women. Overwhelming majority, per CDC.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 02:07 PM
1

Source for these stats pretty please
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 12:45 PM
1

There's not really gender symmetry Ah, right right. Male teachers "rape" their female students, while female teachers "have a romp" with their students. Women's peak age of male attractiveness scales with a woman's age You need to stop jumping around top attractive, attractive at all, attractive to majority, attractive to some, as uncomfortable as it might be, given your peculiar takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 12:39 PM
1

Nobody quite answered the question in that post. Could you share the source for your rather shocking 30/70 statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:13 AM
11

Lesbians also exist 5% or so, outnumbered by gays.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:12 AM
3

Two women are fucking the same guy in their age bracket, three women are dating dudes +26, one girl is single and not looking by chose, and the other one is lesbian. One correction here is that there needs to be no "fucking" for women to report to be "in relationship".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:11 AM
10

Great points, but 70% vs 30% is such a crazy discrepancy, I need to see the receipts source for that data. (I know you are not the OP)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:10 AM
1

OK, so here is this: In USSR, more women were reporting to be married, than men (Census) E.g. in 1959 23.92 million men said they were married, yet there somehow were 24.17 million married women. One would think "that's because WWII", except the same story is in Ruzzian census 2010. With the gap being even more drastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:09 AM
2

A lot of girls start puberty from age 9-15 though. 9-15 is quite a range eh? People who start puberty earlier, will look older than peers. Good example: Elizabeth Taylor. It works both ways and isn't about age at all. People who would lust over underdeveloped (pre-puberty) looks of a human are pedos, even if the said human is 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 07:45 AM
1

The point is that men are attracted to girls younger than 20. And women are attracted to boys younger than 20. And your point was?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 07:29 AM
1

Child mortality rates are also higher in poor countries... Having many kids is quite taxing on parents, women in particular. Most avoid it for that reason. But if it helps, here is an example: Jackie Siegel Miss <some US state> Married to an (older) billionaire. Said she planned to have 2 kids or so, but then figured, hey, there are nannies. So she had 9 (or so, exact number should not matter)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 07:15 PM
6

Under 20 wasn’t an option in that study 1) It was starting at 15. 2) Pedophilia is not about formal age, but PRE-PUBERTY looks
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 07:03 PM
9

the study doesn't include sub-20 It included 15 years old, but thanks for making things up. I mean, I would not expect any less from people who can throw "pedophilia" accusation just like that. And for your (and others) info, pedophilia isn't even about certain AGE. It is about being so sick to be after PRE-PUBERTY looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:31 PM
1

It does seem likely There is no stopping for conspiracy theorists. When facts at hand contradict the made up story, it's just another twist in a story. 20-23 also happens to be the peak fertility age. Plot thickens.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 03:45 PM
31

And what was the lowest age they could choose in that study? The fact that you can simply come to this sub, throw your ridiculous accusations, yet have zero knowledge of the subject is appalling. If your insulting "all men are pedo" take was right, how do you think we got "-23" age and not just 20, eh? It's a rhetorical question...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:22 PM
2

so you dont really need the legal aparatus surrounding it? Setting "define need" aside, we are way beyond that... legal apparatus. (and, yeah, let this sink in) Unmarried Ontario couple had no children and no house but man must still pay support, appeal court rules
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:18 PM
2

It is an ultimate form of commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:16 PM
5

Leonardo DiCaprio is a joke Criticism of DiCaprio is a hypocritical butthurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:11 PM
2

people will rather save leonardo dicaprio from a burning building than his young girlfriend 87% pick "I'd save woman over a men". But. Wait for it. When starting at 87%, guess what "more willing" even means. STUDY: Feminists more willing to ‘sacrifice’ men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:11 PM
2

Yes but we live in a le patriarchy Apex Fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:09 PM
29

If all men (or even just narrow it down to all relevant men) are pedophile Don't bite the bait. Most attractive female age to men of ages 20-50 (study didn't go beyond) are 20-23. That is "teens" only in "I'm butthurt about my age so let me bitch about DiCaprio" kind of way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:07 PM
4

older men would not view them sexual Oh, please. You can find videos of two old journalists (50+ at least) sexually assaulting Brazilian athlete. (groping, stroking) on live TV. Tell me how older women do not view younger men as "sexual". The hypocricy levels in this sub are hard to stand at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:05 PM
41

Men of all ages are said to find women aged 20-23 most attractive. The idea, that there are men, who, learning that is somehow upsets certain individuals, could (let alone would) at will just stop liking what they like, is adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:02 PM
-1

No, it's a 1001 re-hash of 'men re much hornier than women'. And before some BH individual starts telling me how "women also enjoy sex", stop projecting. A being hornier than B, doesn't make B frigid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 12:57 PM
1

What? Anyhow, Sauna's are nudist by default in Germany. Some even don't have separate changing rooms.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 11:13 AM
1

More than a half of the population is overweight 11.5% of women (and 6.9% of men) in the US are MORBIDLY OBESE. It goes both ways, huh? I mean, exorbitant male horniness aside, most humans are not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 09:19 AM
7

Beauty standards are largely NOT cultural. Health fertility/strength (for some gender) is what we find attractive. And I don't get how that is a MHR issue.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:10 AM
1

The west is also overcrowded (e.g. Germany with 240 per square km, Netherlands 520, UK 277), bar US (36). That's a transition issue, not long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 05:31 PM
–

Super fresh study on marriage and happiness (July this year) 30% - motherfucker. “is the most important differentiator with a 30-percentage point happy-unhappy gap over the unmarried. … No subsequent population categorization [black vs. white, young vs. old, rich vs. poor, etc] will yield so large a difference in happiness across so many people.” The authors push for "good marriage > good career" and do not dive into "buh my standards" at all. Quillette's article (direct link to study in the ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 03:52 PM
–

You mean I make it up? Mkay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 03:45 PM
1

Men find women aged 20-23 most attractive. Not below that. And that age is quite above "pedo", isn't it? https://www.youbeauty.com/love/study-reveals-the-age-men-find-women-most-attractive-and-its-seriously-disturbing/
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:37 PM
-1

Why do men get upset a woman chose to give her pussy to another man, five men at the same time or a large farm animal? Because deep down they believe they are entitled to that pussy. Because raising someone else's child is something that can quite happen to men, perhaps? And a women who goes bananas like that is more likely to, well, do that someone else's kid to him. The "entitled" to someone's genitalia is, wow. Impressive take.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:36 PM
5

The planet is overcrowded. I only welcome it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:34 PM
–

This boy values women based on looks and youth alone Mostly, but not alone, and, regardless, it's not a choice. thinks he deserves to fuck older women Not sure where that comes from. Sex is not something one "deserves" or does not deserve in my books, it's something one has or not. shouldn't have standards that exclude him from their vaginas. So this is again about random hookups then. That's not what I call dating though. Dating is LTR to me. Non LTR bang bangs are not a very good strategy for …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:34 PM
9

I didn't even know that PRISM+ shit existed, but now I know. That being said... what a weird reason to want to buy it, eh.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:29 PM
8

Wow. And the dude is Asian. I guess Le Plan was to create shit storm and go viral with this.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:28 PM
–

I think it's the same thing that men do shaming young women in to marriage. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:25 PM
–

lower their standards so that so they let walking excrement Hm, you mean, the standards are so low, that slightly below is literally "walking excrement"? Sounds FDS levels of hateful, to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:25 PM
–

Your post is criminally underrated. That being said, the "standards" raising with age in the OP escaped my attention, I've read it as "why don't they drop" standards, which is something quite different.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:22 PM
–

Women’s attraction to men tends to hover around men their own age. Yeah, actually, +2-3 years up to 45, same age at 45, and a bit less to 50. The study I've checked, didn't go beyond 50. For men it was, wait for it: 20-23 years old look most attractive, no matter how old I am. To make things worse, female fertility tops at that age, so it is highly unlikely to be driven by "society makes us like younger women more". Male fertility (which is rarely a bottleneck anyhow) peaks at mid, sometimes lat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:18 PM
–

Any, not too unhealthy looking (!!!) woman can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual coitus partner. (some plausibly explain the disparity between genders with parental investment being 9+ month for women and several minutes for men) I don't think OP was talking about that sort of "dating" though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:15 PM
–

Most women who are dating in their mid 30s date just fine. That's not impression I get. I mean every week or so some "why is it only 20 years old or some grandpas responding to me" from such women, so, shrug.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:12 PM
–

Shaming is an attempt to somehow change men's behavior. (and good luck with that) I suspect the reason we see a lot of... "raisins" mating with men half/third of their age in the recent movies/series is an attempt to "fix" things by "changing societal standards", and again, good luck with that. At the same time, I don't think one sets standards consciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:04 PM
1

Isn't that whole idea instantly disproven by walking outside and seeing average people in relationships? Depends how on defines "interested". If it is "aroused sexually" it's not disproved, is it? (I don't get why people refer to real findings as "red pilers say") More to it, it also explains why every second couple ends up divorcing and why majority of divorces are initiated by female side.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 01:57 PM
3

Well, I don't see why they could not, but I also suspect that in today's quite online world, it's harder to get real life friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 01:46 PM
–

I feel like That's fine, right? But the data I'm sharing with you has nothing to do with my (or someone else's) personal takes, it's based on actual studies, who have figured gays bang remarkably more often, than lesbians. 20 year old women are hornier/more down to bang than 25. I think peak testosterone levels are at 20-22, so it kinda aligns.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 01:35 PM
1

Even without clothes. Men struggle. It seems that men look to see if the body parts they like are big enough and the ones they don't like are small enough. I don't think so. For a woman to look fit she just needs a high muscle mass Hm. I thought we were talking about q guys ability to guess weight Weight is a secondary indicator that cannot matter more than the primary indicator: health/youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 01:33 PM
1

you can have a high sex drive and not have sex for various reasons You an. shocking, right The way some people think is shocking here, but alas.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 07:09 PM
1

By which random metric, lol? No, 50-ish (healthy) men for 20-ish woman. I can go as low as 40-ish, but then, as "healthy" is relative, I guess. A 25 years old man would happily bang every day (as we see gays do). A 20-25 years old women would go down to once a month and below (as we see lesbians do).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 04:50 PM
1

You think women hate sexual pleasure or what exactly Oh dear. Are you equating "lower sexual drive" with "no interest towards sex at all"? Why are you doing so? they just don't find most partners attractive No, they just want to bang less frequently, even when they are with the partner of choice. As seen by lesbians vs gays sex frequency. For gays, mind you, it's quite typical to bang EVERY DAY. Lesbians go down to once a month AND RARER.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 04:48 PM
1

One of the most famous Russian poets (with some African roots) noted: Чем меньше женщину мы любим, Тем легче нравимся мы ей which roughly translates to (wit: With womankind, the less we love them, The easier they become to charm So, yeah, the effect is sorta real, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 04:44 PM
–

If you are a woman or a man, the only thing YOU know, is how YOU feel. Others having your set of genitalia doesn't mean they feel the same. The whole anecdotal experience talk is ridiculous. We have goddamn studies to figure how objective reality is. It's just some people fail to cope with the VERY WELL ESTABLISHED findings. From hypergamy to libido gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 03:57 PM
1

Women are just as horny as men, it's just that most men aren't arousing. And also most women. I mean, lesbian bang what, 20 times less than gays? The libido gap denialism is peculiar. I've never quite grasp what is causing it. Projections from low sex drive?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 03:14 PM
1

Note that it's a chain of bullying/sexism, not just that remark. But kudos to UK.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 07:59 PM
2

girl speaking how she only dates older guys it’s either because of they’re money or a bad relationship with her dad This sounds fairly judgmental.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 07:54 PM
1

Poor colleagues...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 07:37 PM
0

Per okcupid findings, women rate 80%+ of men as "below average". In contrast, men attraction is nearly ideal bell's curve, with 85% of women dubbed "attractive" or "very attractive" And, for the love of god, can't we have another word for "let's bang"? Something other than "dating". As for where it fails: women are not interested in "let's bang" even REMOTELY as much as men. A 20 years old woman is as horny as, perhaps, a (healthy) man of 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 07:09 PM
1

In an ideal world, men and women come together to provide resources for women and children. In an ideal conservative world, also known as "patriarchy", yes. man children of 2023 This is so incoherent it hurts. You are talking to a parent of two, married for 20+ years. Bias does apply to Asians, just in a different but also negative way. "Minorities underachieve at education, because of the White racism" "But Whites under achieve compared to Asians" "Oh, our theory is still fine, but it's just th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 07:07 PM
1

No, feminists that don't know what they're talking about say that. So, not true Feminist, eh. Men are not privileged in patriarchy They are. That is why it is "male privilege" and not "rich male privilege". Heck, why don't you search it on the internet? E.g.: "Within feminist scholarship, patriarchy has been understood more broadly as the system in which men as a group are constructed as superior to women as a group and as such have authority over them." Mkay? And yes, it's bollocks and has litt…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 07:00 PM
2

Amazing post, thanks for sharing and god bless you!
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:59 PM
1

Men cannot judge weight at all. That statement is... hard to follow. Female clothing might be good at hiding certain aspects of it. But hell judging weight is no rocket science. And the judgement is not about the figure one would see when on scales, but rather, "fit or not".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:54 PM
1

While you are right about the double standards applied here, also note that while some characteristics are immutable, we cannot change how we feel about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:52 PM
–

We generally should strive to favor women over men as the default state of the world. That's what we did for entire human history. Now tell me, what that has to do with "equality". Also, yeah lol I say this as an Asian myself, we are not assessed in the same light as other minorities, You know, I'm fine with someone having a different opinion, in fact, that's a pre-requisite for having a meaningful debate, but your opinion should at last be consistent. If you claim minorities are underrepresente…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:50 PM
–

You could not, stranger who have worked "at some pretty massive companies".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:46 PM
0

If your kids don’t like you it usually has more to do with your relationship In other words, something that affects exclusively men, simply "does not exist"? Not even "it's because patriarchy also hurts men" huh? But then we have the likes of Mr Baldwin who had enough of that "non existing" thing pushing for shared parenting and... wait for it... Feminist groups blocking shared parenting. But let's see what studies re saying: Research indicates that parental alienation is present in 11% to 15% o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:45 PM
–

Biases were heavily entrenched Yep, pro female bias in particular which is curiously strong in... wait a sec, women Which is particularly insulting given that we only have female groups looking how to fix "equality issues". Asians aren’t the minorities I’m talking about here lol. Oh we aren't? They are somehow immune to white racism? That's a convenient way to put dubious theories to test.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:35 PM
1

because they in general never had related hobbies growing up It goes beyond that, I think. You need to be constantly learning in IT field. It's ok if you like it. It's a shock if you don't. (e.g. my spouse could well do it, but she could not be bothered with)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:25 PM
–

My conclusion is from mountains of observations. Thanks for sharing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:24 PM
0

Its your fault for choosing a women who doesn't make much money. And if she took kids and alienates you? It's you fault because <insert something>. Ultimately, everything it's your fault, because you represent "it's your fault" gender. There are systemic issues that have nothing to do with individual choices of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 12:34 PM
1

Let me check: 1) outrageous personal attack - check 2) zero arguments - check Yeah. Thank Lord, you are "not interested" in "debating".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 12:00 PM
–

It is also notable that being CEO reduces, not increases, chances of a woman to find a mate she would find worthy. (I was very careful with wording, I hope some will appreciate it)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:38 AM
–

A lot less women are having families too. And 58% of people consuming anti-depressants for 5+ years straight (in the US) are women aged 45+. Many more young women are performing better today than previously and they all have an eye on the top post. That's a possible way to refer to diversity hiring. HR's are overwhelmingly female, but that's OK. Whereas, if there is any job (bar particularly shitty ones), there is pressure applied to "do something about it" and hire more women. This leads to wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:36 AM
–

More like top 1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:31 AM
–

Because the system is not set up to help men, Come again, why the system, that Feminists tell me was created by men FOR MEN is not set up to help men pretty please? Women have been prioritzed as objects for men, nothing else Ah, right. Like sending men to war against their will, but not sending women. But it was "as objects". It is fairly convenient that some meaningless buzzword can be thrown in to invalidate cut and clear statistical findings showing men are at the bottom of our social pyramid…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:29 AM
–

The proto-feminist declaration from back 1848 referred to women as, wait for it, "the MORE valuable gender".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:25 AM
–

Nazism hurts Germans, too! Ahaha, did you just compare Feminism to Nazism? I think it makes sense to ask it, after a peer reviewed Feminist journal published "Mein Kampf" chapter in which men were the Jews. Anyhow, nazism/fascism was about state being above people, it wasn't for Germans upfront.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 11:24 AM
–

This list includes some genuine advantages that women have (and a few they don’t). It fails to mention the advantages that men have. Go ahead, mention them. And let it be something that is NOT an apex fallacy, pretty please. As in something that in the OP, that affects entire group and not a handful of individuals you just happened to pick up to make a bogus point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:57 AM
–

That's because you chose the metric where women outperform men. Enlighten us. Now choose metrics that men dominate. Let's do it! For instance, making fat stacks of cash 1) It is Asian Women who made most money as a group in US 2) It was MARRIED MEN who made more money in the past (30% more than single men) Guess where that money went. life sentences without parole, life sentences with parole You are answering to an OP that mentions that there is SYSTEMIC anti male bias, yet find it relevant to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:55 AM
–

And what some rando out there told you, is somehow even remotely relevant to this thread, because?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:50 AM
–

ifyou think men aren’t harmed by patriarchy I think "men created patriarchy, for the benefit of men" is a brain fart.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:49 AM
–

Because the system is not set up to help men, it’s set up to help wealthy, white men. By prioritizing women over men since forever. What a curiously bizarre "for men" system.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:48 AM
–

Fun fact, patriarchy is terrible for men too! No, that makes zero sense, as patriarchy is touted not simply a system created by men, but a system CREATED FOR MEN. And the "for men" bit is not a minor thing, it's foundational, as without it, you cannot blame a random person of certain gender of being "privileged" just for having a dick and identifying with gender given at birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:47 AM
–

benefitted heavily from never having to compete with women until now. What... we’re cutting the dead weight and hiring with less bias By which metric are you hiring with "less bias", if you openly prioritize one gender over another? (women/minorities) Asians are part of minorities, but outperform any other group, including Whites.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:45 AM
–

It’s crazy you say that because I actually find the women I work with (STEM job) to be more competent on average if we have to break it down by gender. Nothing beats anecdotal evidence, huh? I mean, diversity hiring improving overall quality, what is there to hmm about, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:41 AM
–

This post highlights that society in the west bends over for women at the expense of men It was never any different. While it is true today (and was true in the past) that men are over represented on the top of the society, it is also overwhelmingly men who are on the bottom. In the past, men would be sent to wars against will. The way it happens in the Ukraine / Ruzzia today.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:40 AM
1

Could you be more specific? Also, why was the parent post deleted, I don't even remember the context. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:29 PM
1

I am going strictly on the evidence provided I've chuckled.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:29 PM
-1

While I agree that it deserves to fail, it is important to see There are alternatives available, including places where you can read in detail what the movie has shown, let alone, feedback by the likes of Piers Morgan, who also went into gret detail.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:27 PM
0

Why do men want to put all the power and control into women’s hands with that? You have completely missed the point. Women are in the same situation you describe men to be, just vs a subset of men. What you’re suggesting doesn’t work, because men are trying to coerce women into doing some thing rather than them taking responsibility for their own bodies. As if you haven't even read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:26 PM
1

Most men are asking for more than what most women can provide in the sex department. That’s why men need to take care of some of it themselves. But why? Not god forbid women. Not even both genders. Men specifically. I know why. You likely know why too. But would not admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:24 PM
-3

For fucks sake DATING MARKET HAS NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH MENS FUCKING HUMAN RIGHTS JESUS FREAKING CHRIST!!!!! When a man bangs, it's some minutes of pleasure. When a woman bangs, she can end up knocked out for 9+ month extremely vulnerable, die while giving birth (yes, it's a low figure today, it wasn't that low in the past) and end up with a kid that resembles that dude she even didn't like that match. THERE IS AN INHERENT SEX APPETITE GAP, GET THE FUCK OVER IT.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:10 AM
49

In Conclusion: They inadvertently made Barbie the narcissistic villain and Ken the tragic hero. No. My wife's friends took it literally and sang "we are so oppressed" song. And, Jesus Christ, your expectations that women would watch movie about women and how they suffer "in real world" in it and give a flying F about dudes is adorable.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:04 AM
-17

I watched the movie out of curiosity. Thank you so much for contributing to this men-hating propaganda piece's success.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:03 AM
–

What does it have with this sub though? A fun fact: on menslib subreddit (essentially, a sorta soft men's rights sub for emasculated men) it is forbidden to point out physical differences between genders. The context of that rule has nothing to do with trans women though. It is about insane idea of explaining all gender differences as societal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:46 AM
3

What we need are possible solutions I think I have found great analogy for what you suggest. We know, that the particularly good looking men swim in dates, to female dismay. Imagine telling women to "just stop picking up very good looking men". Would that work?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:43 AM
2

Why don’t men just accept women as is... For the same reason women don't just accept men as is? Women try to keep up with their partners sex drive Some do, many don't, and most advise to ignore men's needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:41 AM
2

I’m not asking for the impossible. If guys would just wake up and take care of their morning wood they would be fine for the rest of the day. You realize that, to put it softly, not all men are even on such platform, right? There is an interest gap towards sex, which leads to disparity on the "let's bang" platforms, and you are suggesting that men should address that, by removing THEMSELVES out, for the sake of the others. How is that a wise move for the individuals who would do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:39 AM
1

I doubt people can do anything about what they like and what they don't like. LTR is about finding the best you can for both genders. It gets sad and hilarious at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:37 AM
2

No. Height mattered always.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:01 AM
–

though nowhere near to the extent of the current gym bro culture. This WILDLY contradicts my personal experience. Unless you mean very oversized people on steroids. But even they, while not every woman's dream, have a very sizable fan base.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 08:43 AM
0

Why do "we" want that to begin with? But to reality. An example: friends family has a son, who is tall and quite athletic and has just crossed 18. (face is, no Henry Cavill, but not ugly either) His mother, shocked, recently told us about seeing a waitress leave her phone number, in front of her, when they went out to dine. Does that count as "the first move"? While women approach differently (and some are in mass attraction mode and let me think whom I like) it doesn't mean they are not "making…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:47 AM
1

Women are sexually attracted to pop stars in general, not just K-pop. The difference with K-pop might be... they are male. (and young)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 07:22 AM
8

Of course not. Apex fallacy. Apex is mostly men, but majority of men is on the bottom (homeless, suicides, deaths at work and even underdogs at school)
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:20 AM
1

Oh sure you are, old lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 06:49 AM
–

I am no Jesus. I cannot make blind people see. I also cannot imagine someone arguing in a good faith, but not reading that in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 06:45 AM
–

fucking an unresponsive partner I cannot even imagine that. I mean, f*cking an overweight log who does not even like you. But then I might be spoiled. It doesn't change the fact she didn't not only love, but even like her previous partner, absolutely disregarded him and even had what it takes (again, gender that is more equal than others) to display herself as a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 06:45 AM
3

Sure. If you have been the victim of rape or sexual assault then you can seek an award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. The CICA is a government-funded organisation that makes payment to the victims of crimes of violence which includes rape and sexual assault. https://www.cica-criminal-injury.co.uk/sexual-assault-rape/levels-of-compensation-for-victims-of-rape-and-sexual-assault/
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:43 AM
21

Depends on the country. In UK it is monetary reward (yes, seriously). UK already has convicted SERIAL false rape accusers.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:38 PM
1

Of course. As for the more equal of the two genders, sex is not as important.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:23 PM
1

Thanks for bothering to elaborate. PS My looking up renders AL as "Brazilian model". That doesn't explain why she had to mention a female model.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:22 PM
–

Bollocks. She went "lesbian bed death". He obviously went "if we don't fuck, I'll fuck with someone else". Why cant you sacrifice a bit of quantity for quality? Many gay men bang daily. You can find Men's Health warning about not ejaculating for more than 2 weeks. "Sex nearly every week" is already quite a sacrifice. And here we are very obviously talking about a scale of months.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:20 PM
1

You might need to get a clue about human male physiology, entitled sexist random reddo.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:18 PM
–

I don't know why random reditors with visibly rather limited mental capacity think repeating "what the fuck" is somehow appropriate, but oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:17 PM
–

How do you get a husband of 2 kids get so upset about not having sex? She neglected him to that point. She simply did not like him. The rest is such a lame excuse (wow, new husband doesn't complain when they bang at least once a week, no shit whatson).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:16 PM
–

Right. And that is because that's not a problem women would typically have. Even though men risk getting serious issues from abstentions longer than 2 weeks. Figures. I mean, who cares about what men want or feel, huh? She totally didn't neglect him. Absolutely not. made-up stories. Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:43 PM
1

Not having sex for a long time is absolutely neglecting the partner. It is only "OK", because it is typically done by the gender, who, despite all genders being equal, is more equal, than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:41 PM
0

Oh, that's what it was? And a C grade actress was picked over some random C grade actor, for what reason exactly? Is it sorta "funnier" that way? Anyway, takes on what constitutes "a good partner" (from age, to looks to education) are rather different between genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:39 PM
–

His "threatening" behavior is the result of his spouse completely neglecting him, genius who sides with people just based on their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:36 PM
–

Ah, confusing concept isn't it? I mean getting to realize that one has to refuse to have sex for quite some time, for other party to "threaten all thorts of things" about it? Yeah, it's very hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:34 PM
–

That's a pretty big difference. Which is solely on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:33 PM
–

Ex of Herr Depp.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:33 PM
–

I see. He has needs. She has needs. But her needs > his needs. Since all genders are equal, but some genders are more equal than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:32 PM
1

There is no "market". Better looking men have abundance of sex partner females, who are actually looking for long term relationships. This is the way things work since sexual revolution. Okcupid and the likes have changed jack shit.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:08 PM
–

gnoring her kids' needs. They really need attention, nutrition, and care. Yeah, all moms absolutely focus on the kids' needs. Totally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:07 PM
–

once the kids are out the man inevitably turns from a partner to a disposable resource That's not true. Although kids > parents (and, of course, although both parents are equal, some are more equal than others), yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:05 PM
–

A man who help eliminate those pressures instead of adding to them. You are seeing things which are simply nowhere, it is purely your imagination. The only difference to the second guy is that he does not "demand sex". But why on earth does he even need to do it, when they bang at least once a week. (by lesbian standards, very frequently)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:04 PM
–

because he treats her right That's a wild assumption in this context. The whole "treat right" was about "doesn't want to bang me, when I don't want to". But why on earth would it even be a problem, if she anyway bang-bangs once a week, lol? Please, I understand you want to side with a woman (it's a human trait) but let's be reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:02 PM
–

No wonder so many men here no matter what always think the woman is awful. Ironic to read this in the world where there is a cohort of women still openly siding with Frau Heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:01 PM
–

Because it's not sexy when someone is threatening and demanding you do something. OP overthinks things and fills in gaps deliberately, but you are outright reversing the order of events. The fuck. How is this a question? Oh, sorry, I cannot pretend your take has any merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 03:59 PM
–

women are already complaining that their male buddies/acquaintances would fuck them given half the chance Stop mixing "would fuck" and "are interested in LTR" please. This keeps and keeps and keeps happening on this sub and it's crazy. Mating strategy is problematic for both genders. Parental investment gap makes "let's bang" a no brainer for one gender and a hell of a big deal for the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 03:40 PM
1

Because people would rather blame individuals for their own problems/assume people have some moral deficit that causes their problem That is how it works specifically with the group mentioned in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 01:25 PM
3

Because standard answer to men's problem is "f*ck you, your own fault", rephrased a bit more politely. More advanced responses go to "f*ck you, your GENDER's fault". Why that makes sense to so many people, I am not sure. Perhaps we are not as smart primates as we think we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 01:25 PM
0

y’all really think I have a chance Adriana Lima It escalated quickly. I have no idea who you are talking about (some C grade actress?), or why, in your mind, it has any relevance. But the point of my comment was that you cannot "exaggerate" and/or "joke" and then make a point referencing the exaggeration at its face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 01:01 PM
0

I can at least speak about my own gender No. You are absolutely not a person that is authorized to talk on the behalf of a whole gender. You can speak about your own experience, but that is rather irrelevant too. you’re claiming to know more That's a lovely way to refer to "there are actual studies on the subject". find me a PEER REVIEWED STUDY(that means it’s been fact checked by hundreds of scientists) That's not what "peer reviewed" means. There is a "Mein Kampf" chapter that made it into a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 12:58 PM
2

Sarkozi anyone? Maybe Boris Johnson? Imagine he would be, say, a school teacher. Do you think he would bang the women he banged?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:49 AM
1

so they ignore the red flags Attractive women are measurably more aggressive. (yeah, the article pulls it off as "buh it might be environmental") Physical attractiveness and its relation to unprovoked and reactive aggression
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:45 AM
1

So the foundation of the point you were trying to make is just a joke. That's not how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:43 AM
0

No one chooses the guy that they see as unsafe That is not the point being made. They are not chosen for being "unsafe". The "unsafe" is a side effect from other qualities that are found attractive. So it goes like: In ancestral times, alpha males had higher status, resources, and access to mates, making them more likely to pass on their genes to the next generation. As a result, humans have evolved to find alpha males attractive as potential partners or rivals. But we want to get scientific abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:41 AM
1

I’m a woman, a guy was saying women are attracted to bad guys(the ones that make them feel unsafe). Im saying as a woman, who has had many women friends - and the life experience The thought that being of some gender makes you an expert in that gender is adorable. People you are talking to might be referring to something called "studies". The "conflict" in here is that women have that fairly tale "we are so great" take on one of the human genders that everyone absolutely must pretend to be real.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:21 AM
1

No. Pills are not comparable to irreversible changes to one's body.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 04:32 PM
–

The word "misogyny" is as meangingles today, as the word "nazi". The way it is used. it means little beyond "I don't like what that person says". they'd speak of girls beneath their league with a flair of utter disgust: Have you heard about that okcupid review in which we figured that on that platform men find 85% of women attractive or very attractive, while women find 80% "below average" and, wait for it, having mental problems? Yeah, so, how is that different, bar the fact that here it is vas…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:20 PM
0

May I ask if this counts as a woman being bothered by male attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:47 AM
1

In my experience she has to be especially un-attractive or have extremely poor hygiene for me not to be able to experience arousal with her. "with her" as in "date with whom we are about to have snusnu" and just with her sitting next to you are not the same thing. Snusnu itself is a reason for arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:35 AM
2

I’ve heard a lot of women say they feel invisible and get no male attention at all, which is a very valid feeling for people of all genders who are not conventionally attractive. I have an ironic example that touches on some natural things some people might find upsetting...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:34 AM
1

Men's sexuality doesn't have to be activated Well, I doubt it works when women are in burkas. And "but it isn't in burkas"... think again, what % of female clothing is rather revealing of either skin or shape or both. I am with you on "activated" bit. "Turn me on" is a thing, at least, my personal anecdotal (rather long) life experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:07 AM
1

Easy (and both terrifying and hilarious that someone is seriously pushing it as "deception rape") Imagine this: "I'm a freaking millionaire, this is my Lamborghini and I've earned it myself, I own a startup". And in reality, dude just got a car from his friend who works at a parking company. The "OMG< I would not have banged with you" that comes after.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:56 AM
1

By the subs standards, people who know the findings of evolutionary psychology are red pilers, so, here I am, I guess. Yeah, fairly successful, married for more than two decades, for the second time. Look younger than I am actually am, my spouse perhaps much more so. (healthy lifestyle helps, but I guess were were lucky on the gene side of things too) Didn't have issues finding a partner at no age, including very early university years. Was heart broken at school though, but then I wasn't lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:47 AM
1

Why is that a MHR issue???
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:40 PM
1

Car insurance for an 18 year old girl is less than car insurance for a 25 year old man, because an 18 year old girl is statistically far less likely to get into an accident Because they are... afraid of consequences of driving recklessly. And risk averse in general. Whether you think insurance cost differences for young males and young females is fair or not That was never the point (and I do think it's fair)
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:40 AM
1

It's like the "gender pay gap." Men in the US earn more than women in the US. Yeah, corrections though: 1) Specifically MARRIED men outearned single men by 30% the last time I've checked. So it was married men who earned more 2) For 4 quarters straight, in the US, the group that out earns everyone else is... Asian women.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:38 AM
1

Well, if they could be attracted to their options and commit, Yeah, but remember that meme with guy looking at another woman? That is a huge problem for our species. As in "dump me and go with some other woman", which is an obvious "better don't do it" and a huge problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:36 AM
1

Could you cite the relevant bit please, I feel dumb...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:27 AM
2

We are seriously discussing "male" and "female" species here? :))) OP looks like someone form the femcel subreddit, the /femaledatingstrategy. It's an eye opening marvel of reddit, shows insane expectations so many entitled individuals have. A pity it's hidden.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:23 AM
1

Ah yess the illogical and emotional response. Something you don't like doesn't become "illogical". The parent post is spot on, our behavior is shaped by evolution, not tests invented a handful of decades ago (and illegal/problematic in a number of places). Nor does the test address the problem. There are countries where men are still forced to pay child support even if it's not their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:21 AM
0

There's a thing called a paternity test It's too late when that happens. Oh, and is prohibited in France. On planet Earth, we call putting men into disadvantaged position by law "IKWALITY".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:19 AM
4

Dont know Largely summarizes your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:18 AM
4

UK (no, no notable difference in divorce rate) The main finding is that between 1963 and 2005, the distribution of age differences for all marriages is very similar in each year to the distribution of age differences for the subset of couples who married in that year, but have since divorced. While there is some evidence of small variations in the proportion of marriages that end in divorce by age difference, there does not seem to be evidence of a strong association. Age differences at marriage…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:17 AM
10

This is a lie, just repeated many times by many (similar) sources: This: "Age gap relationships will put you at more of a divorce risk than n count ever will." Actual study (UK): The main finding is that between 1963 and 2005, the distribution of age differences for all marriages is very similar in each year to the distribution of age differences for the subset of couples who married in that year, but have since divorced. While there is some evidence of small variations in the proportion of marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:16 AM
8

Interesting data This: "Age gap relationships will put you at more of a divorce risk than n count ever will." is a patent lie. The main finding is that between 1963 and 2005, the distribution of age differences for all marriages is very similar in each year to the distribution of age differences for the subset of couples who married in that year, but have since divorced. While there is some evidence of small variations in the proportion of marriages that end in divorce by age difference, there d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:15 AM
4

Men are so desperate to try and justify age gap relationships. There is no need to "justify" relationship between two adults, sorry to break it to you. It seems, someone else is both desperate and incoherent about gender differences in aging. And nearly every second movie having some old lady, including grannies hanging out with young men means that our DEI charlatans really believe that foundational instincts of our species are, somehow, merely socially induced. Hilarious. However, men very con…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:10 AM
1

These are 2 very different things: 1) Don't initiate sex with me (a weird thing to ask) 2) Don't initiate sex with me, when someone else turned you on (why should there be anyone else turning your partner, eh?) Last, but not least, how is your personal interaction with some other person MHR issue?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 09:53 AM
1

Only one: 1) Men and women address Women Are Wonderful Effect and stop being sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:14 PM
4

Femcel is basically a woman whose SMV is low enough that the guys she can land are not sexually attractive to her at all No, not at all. Femcel is a woman who,although she can find someone to bang her, are not able to find a guy who "cares" about them, as in, no long term relationships. Male homo sapiens are way too horny for a large group of "unf*ckable" female homo sapiens to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:06 PM
2

Woman generally don’t manifest their extreme frustration in violence) Please, stop making things up. In this case, it is also sexist. (yes, stereotypes being bad work both ways, I would call that "equality") 'How to Murder Your Husband' writer found guilty of murdering her husband
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:04 PM
3

58% of anti-depressant consumers (for more than 5 years straight) in the US are women aged 45+. That army keeps growing, me thinks, and skewing the income by DEI programs, to stroke someones nonsensical theory, will only harm more. And, sorry to break it to you, but: It wasn't men who earned more, it was SPECIFICALLY married men. Roughly 30% more than single men. However this is all changing. Woman( in the west) are already outperforming men when it comes to education attainments Since no later …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:00 PM
25

Women FEEL more unsafe That's why car insurance for 18 old girl costs less than insurance for 25 years old men with 2 years of driving. So women's feelings trump facts, as usual. Yeah, in a way, or rather, when women feel disadvantaged, it's a call for action.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:12 PM
17

Just the other day there was a post on Instagram about how men on Uber make more money than women on Uber, and at least 50% of it is due to men working early morning and late night. What I remember was men getting 7% or 13% (doesn't matter here) more PER HOUR than women. Half of that was due to men driving faster. Another half, due men driving more in general (Uber rewards it with higher hourly rates). The absolutely appalling was the conclusion that something is wrong with the system and it is …
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:11 PM
2

I think men usually have a spontaneous sex drive It's... more sinister than that, I'm afraid, check the Coolidge reference in the sibling post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 12:08 PM
4

Weight the consequences of sex in a historic homo sapiens setting. (99.99% hunter gatherer). Men: minutes of fun, maybe will get kids as a side effect, might or might not need to help with the kids. Women: knocked out as fully functioning human for 9 month, tricky birth giving process in 9 month, left with a kid that resembles dude that she didn't even like that much. It is obvious, that "high libido" is very impractical for one of the genders. That being said, it doesn't rule out that for any g…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 12:05 PM
1

Any particular article that you remember stating something along those lines?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 11:57 AM
1

NP, and sorry your earlier post got downvoted for no reason. I've +1ed in.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 11:54 AM
2

What on earth is APD?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:57 PM
79

Women thin the ranks of dateable men further. I think it is more of a desire of the author of that so called article rather than a real thing.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:08 PM
7

"what’s even worse yet, if he’s seen it and he thinks it’s not a good movie" How dares he. Motherfucker.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:07 PM
1

I think it isn't wrong to (sexually?) want anything, within an established legal framework. Say, books. "I want to fuck books, is that OK?" "Of course it is!" I mean, free society, and stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:59 PM
3

No, sorry. :( And my google fo is failing me, checked the first 5 pages. But I swear I am not making it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:54 PM
3

CDC stats say that obesity rates are at about 40% for the both genders. HOWEVER. At severe obesity range, there are way more women than men. (6.9% vs 11.5%) 166 women per 100 men. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/overweight-obesity
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:50 PM
2

I hope it was sarcasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:43 PM
1

Cite the relevant bit, please. Asking, because I suspect you are misreading the sentence(s).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:41 PM
1

Doubt the woman is going to stick around very talented but for now poor guy, if he doesn't actually start making money. Evolutionary psychologists have tested it. And it makes sense, right, from evolution perspective, to pick the best genes possible. One can argue that resources sort of "counter weight" it, but, anyhow, those were the results. (and, f*ck me, I didn't save it nor can find it anymore, my source for the research links was quillette, which is now paywalled to hell :() And yet medioc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:40 PM
1

It’s evolutionary psychology conjecture Based on what findings? They theorize that spousal violence from men evolved to keep women from cheating, as well. Never heard that... COuld it be that you read it in feminazi sources?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:37 PM
13

their looksmatch. "Looks match" seems to be shockingly skewed in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:41 PM
12

Why not mention both? Because when a men complains about "oh, me so fat", the most typical reaction is "get to an effing gym and eat less", perhaps?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:40 PM
23

Women here are very good at balancing technical traits and social traits. There is a book from 1997 about that. Written by former co-Chair of NOW, Dr Warren Farrel. It is called "Why Men Earn More". He lists 37 choices in which (on average, of course) men pick work, while women pick life. Heck, you can even see that in stats like how much time each gender spends to commute to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:38 PM
10

Women are more attractive (or put more effort into their appearance) then men. Bollocks. Vast majority of women looks meh. But men have a very very strong sexual drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:36 PM
27

The level of entitlement this women displayed was astonishing and yet the program was acting as if she was the one getting the raw deal in the dating market. Oh wow, I've seen an article on BBC that was shaming a man for having a date with 3 women on the same day.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:35 PM
1

Such double standards are actually everywhere (e.g. take on domestic violence perpetrated by two genders, Netflix is showing ex wife punching husband as something that is totally OK) Welcome to the real world, Ken. Sorry that bar the apex of our social pyramid, that is thoroughly sprinkled with men (a number of which invested their lives into getting there) we actually live in a barbie world, where we are testing female only drugs in this very order: mice - dogs - chipms - men - women, because "…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:33 PM
1

How do they know it's a result of "the past"? Given the past is younger years with peak testosterone levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:26 PM
1

Nah, even Henry Cavill or Keanu Reeves was a virgin at some point, so what.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 08:27 PM
2

So, there are 2 states for women, that bike thing and a virgin. Figures. PS Yes, it's a medical issue for women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 08:10 PM
4

What is PUA?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 08:06 PM
1

Her being the town bicycle is her status. It's not "that" status. For men, "that" sort of status would be having erectile dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 08:05 PM
1

dating issues would be fixed tomorrow if men weren't so desperate for pussy. No, as it wouldn't solve the underlying issue: monstrous libido gap. And if someone things it's "because society", let's look at homosexual people, shall we? 1) Many gay men bang every day. 2) Most lesbians go down to once a month and even way below that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:28 PM
1

These 3 statemens are in reality that one last statement: A woman (not all women, but many) can dress up sexy, go to a bar or night club alone, and expect men to approach her. A woman can upload 2-3 pictures on a dating app and expect many men she matches with to message her, try to initiate a conversation. A woman can easily have casual sex if she choses to. What's the unspoken nuance to "gender roles are utterly ridiculous bullshit" that makes it so these things literally don't matter Wait, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:24 PM
-3

Isn't it exactly the opposite in the media, by the way? Aren't we shown how men need to STFU and do what wives say? E.g. the short Netflix series "The Watcher" (came off quite weird) where his wife literally orders him, as a 5 years old boy, what he MUST do, stressing she is not "asking", but that's what "he has to do"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:04 PM
10

evolutionarily, men prefer women to be submissive Can you share a study that shows that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:02 PM
-1

Are you saying that it isn't a lame strawman, but a real thing someone "asks"? Given the popularity of "50 shades", could it be just a weird projection? 50 shades of Grey outsells Harry Potter
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 07:01 PM
1

Why is submission from a woman integral to a relationship? What does "submission" even mean here, to begin with? Let alone, which mystical "manosphere" guy said that? Some <insert social media> troll?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:59 PM
1

a lot of men here think that high value men are exempt from being monogamous Isn't that how overwhelming majority of celebrities, including crazy nerds like Bill Gates, behave?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:58 PM
6

Wait, really? Men think that way too? Wow, US, I'm speechless...
/r/MensRights28/07/23 06:53 PM
2

OP jumped back back and forth between "mid 20s extremely attractive" and "conventionally attractive", so, you do have a point indeed, it is definitely reasonable to read it the way you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:50 PM
2

I dont really seen this "hypergamy" Such findings (and we are talking about scientific findings here) are almost (I can't come up with an example) never about absolutely all human beings on this planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:15 PM
2

the rest of us exist. Yes. But what does it have to do with this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:13 PM
3

Women will always pick money and status That's not true either. E.g. very talented, but (for now) poor guy is more attractive than mediocre offspring of a millionaire.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:12 PM
0

Hot woman dates rich, charming male is the oldest trope ever. Trope as in "a myth"? Heck, majority of stereotypes are actually spot on. Stereotype Accuracy: A Displeasing Truth
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:12 PM
-3

Men also chase status. This is measurably not true as have shown in numerous studies by evolutionary psychologists, including "here are X points, allocate them to your ideal candidate". That is how the "hypergamy" was discovered. (some of the users here think there is some mystical "manosphere" that invented it) Another, rather curious finding, was that hypergamy gets stronger with woman's status. I.e. a Harvard graduate woman overshoots more. Men are chasing more than beauty. This is measurably…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:10 PM
3

In reverse it's "a shame" though. E.g. Di Caprio shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 06:07 PM
1

Cite it please. And, no, "especially men" doesn't mean that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 05:55 PM
1

Yes. For starters, 16% are frigid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 09:25 PM
1

How is that giving up autonomy? What sort of "autonomy" would Frau Gates or Frau Bezos (how many billions did they get by the way? Is there a single example of a man marrying into billions?) have, had they been working in parallel?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:42 PM
1

Sigh. "Men are MORE affected" means women are not affected nonsense again?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:40 PM
1

I've posted links a couple of times in subbranches, too lazy to dig it again, sorry. (and yeah, it would make sense to include them upfront, sorry again)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:39 PM
1

It seems women are more depressed than men, and single people are more depressed than married people. But it appears the difference is greater between married and single men than between married and single women. That's how I got it too. If that’s not why they’re single, then there’s still no “revenge” for promiscuous women. No "revenge" for promiscuity, but "revenge" for hypergamy. I hope you don't mean "revenge" seriously. It just happens that certain things (over which we have exactly zero co…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:38 PM
1

You clearly haven't read the study as it shows basically the opposite of what you wanted to convey earlier. I love how you've marked bold "especially in men". It means it doesn't happen to women, right? Oh well, never mind then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:34 PM
2

Age was accounted for, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:32 PM
1

otherwise happier single What? No. Happier with partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:30 PM
1

most men who have reached a certain age without children simply don’t want them It's not true, but even if it was, how does it negate fertility point? Heck, 2023, year when people in all seriousness challenge theory of evolution. having a child is considered a box that men should check. Leaving offspring is a fundamental instinct of a living organism. In case of men it manifests itself into one hell of a sex drive. babysitting activities We were hunters-gatherers for 99.99% of our history as spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:28 PM
2

It’s a shame that men don’t value their lives. It's evolution. Society needs men to sacrifice themselves for the good of others. From Ukrainian men dying at frontlines to fend off the enemy, to Japanese men going to near death in Fukushia. No pill is going to change your life situation but it will definitely make it less likely that you’ll try to ease your pain through death. If that's the case, we should see stats showing how introduction of anti-depressants improved the figures... Except, the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:19 PM
1

Everything has a side effect but if the benefit is that you aren’t dead, I think it’s a good trade off. We know for a fact men part with their lives easier than women. It makes sense to me, given biology. It isn't clear if ADs easy the pain or not. It is also not clear if a broke man who has been stripped of anything he cares in life, could be saved by some silly pills. Likely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:47 PM
1

Wanted as in "feeling attractive", along these lines (hell, she's a sexist pig, but I still feel sorry...), I think. As privileged how, pick any sphere, from incarceration to, heck, no, no limits. Simply pick an area.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:45 PM
1

It's easier for married people, no matter how fair or unfair it is. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495 Also, 40 is quite a bit too early (it was "consumes antidepressants for 5+ years") for menopause, is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:42 PM
3

Men of all ages find women aged 20-22-ish most attractive. It's not weird at all and overlaps with peak fertility, so has one hell of a solid evolutionary reasons to be that way. It is quite a bit weird (Pugachova - Galking) the other way around, but men are quite democratic and are into all sorts of imaginable and (unfortunately) even unimaginable stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:40 PM
1

From being wanted and privileged to, well, not being that wanted, if at all, and less privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:38 PM
-1

Fair enough. Start with this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/health/antidepressants-withdrawal-prozac-cymbalta.html Follow up with this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:36 PM
1

Fair enough. Start with this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/health/antidepressants-withdrawal-prozac-cymbalta.html Follow up with this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:36 PM
1

Yeah, effing effs. They kill themselves, then complain nothing is done to address men's problems. Why do we need to address men's problems pretty please? Are they women fighting for equality or something? Despicable. That being said, anti-depressants (nearly all drugs, I don't even know exceptions) have side effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:32 PM
1

NYT doesn't call out that status: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/health/antidepressants-withdrawal-prozac-cymbalta.html But then there is that: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:29 PM
1

relationship between women being promiscuous in their 20s OH, sorry, that's not the part I've signed. Promiscuity has nothing to do with it, although, men have good reason to avoid women that are too open to random bang-bangs, for very very very obvious reasons. As for "regardless of marital status", that's not how I read it. For women, in turn, being single – but not being divorced/widowed – was associated with depressive symptoms. And as for divorced/widowed, note that it simply affects divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:28 PM
1

I was being sarcastic. What on earth is patriarchytm? A male conspiracy against women? Like, seriously? So that Trudeau guy who rules Canada and, among other things, have banned African boys from receiving foreign aid (amazing story, by the way), is of some help to Canadian men? Maybe Biden? Maybe that Khan guy, major of London? Maybe that Spanish PM? Heck, is there a single instance?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:17 PM
32

Yep, but note how majority of women, when they can (if men earns a lot), go "traditional" as in, drastically reduce their employment hours, if men earns a lot, to a zero. And, yeah, while we are at it: men (used to, as now it's Asian women) earn more than any other group, but at the same time married men earn 30% more than single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:34 PM
2

The underlying play is "does he care about me", "is he able to provide resources", "is he willing to commit resources". Some serious societal change is needed for meals to be excluded from that, but the need will not disappear. It is very apparently not quite "equal" practice, which leads to hilarious mental gymnastics in today's feminists, to justify it. (there is also "dependent on a man" aspect to it, that adds to the tension) Regardless, we were hunter-gatherers for 99.99% of our history as …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:31 PM
-3

It says nothing about the amount of depressed single women 40+ It doesn't? Mea culpa. Yeah, it doesn't say. It kinda hints. In my humble opinion. pleases cite the study That's fairly pointless as it doesn't stay anything relevant anyhow, does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:25 PM
2

Women past their peak years (which start AND end earlier then men's) are struggling to cope with reality, is my conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:15 PM
2

Yeah, how dare I wonder if something could be done to help men! On the other hand, women are grown up people capable of walking across parking places. (also, overwhelming majority of assault victims are actually male) But we have the "women only" parking spots close to the parking entrance. At least in Germany. For some weird reason. As if some animals were more equal than other animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:10 PM
7

Masturbation is NOT bad. (a form of sex, yes, it is) Celibate is particularly bed for men (should not last longer than 2 weeks) Sexual objects are to stimulate people who have that need. There is nothing wrong with sexual objects. That includes drawings and movies. It is a lie, that only men have such objects. Female version of porn is erotic books, a billion dollar (!!!) industry.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:35 PM
1

"wonder when it was wrong" is likely happening, although, several years later.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:31 PM
6

And seeing as men commit suicide around 4 times more than women, perhaps more men could use some antidepressants. Yep. But #Patriarchytm doesn't let them, I was told by enlightened people. (I was asking, why it wasn't an issue to address) So, sort of "selber schuld". (German)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:28 PM
5

Are you suggesting that single women 45+ are on anti depressants because they've had casual sex? No, I don't think so. I do think women have more to long for at that age, than do men (on top of men not going to see a doctor, until they nearly literally fall apart) But also, the way I have discovered this sub was a chain of the following curious things posted on /dataisbeautiful: 1) Major overlap between /FemaleDatingStrategy (femcels disguised as successful women "helping each other") and mental…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:24 PM
4

principles of the manosphere Who is that manosphere guy and where can I read what he writes? Does stuff I read on quillette (who I was told was founded by two sisters) count? Does it still count if it was written by a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:35 PM
6

age gap relationships are viewed with a lot of suspicion Ahaha, really? You mean all those grannies that I see in the series hanging out with young men are viewed with a lot of suspicion? (e.g. "Umbrella Academy", "Ozark") Perhaps you meant "when it's the man, who's older". It looks like fembutthurt over gender differences in aging vs attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:32 PM
39

The idea that a lot of the women who partake in casual sex are gonna wake up single one day at 35 and wonder where it all went wrong, why they couldn’t find the one etc. isn’t based in reality Indeed. 58% of the anti-depressant consumers (for 5+ years straight) in the US are single women aged 45+. So, yeah, that day probably happens a bit later. At 40 or so. I have finally figured what the heck the mystical "manosphere" thing really is. The man hating sexist pig, Sally Miller, who happens to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:28 PM
5

This is so detached from reality, it hurts to read. 1) Women have lower sex drive than men for good freaking biological reasons, such as having YEARS of parental investment per child vs minutes by men. 2) This raises the plank for "would bang-bang, just for the bang-bang sake" for women. 3) Genders split is roughly 50/50. 4) "I can get a partner" is problematic for both genders. Women can get someone to bang them, but that's not "a partner". 5) Effing 58% of the anti-depression drug consumers fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:00 PM
5

Why should there be women (or men, for that matter) in every X minutes of some random movie pretty please?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:00 PM
11

Great link, thank you.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:05 AM
11

Feminism might have started with a good purpose Or with outright lies from day 1. E.g. Frau Wolf's rant about how there is no female Shakespeare, because "women were banned from writing poems". Except, there was no such bans and there were poems written by women. Oh, and she herself was privileged as fuck. The urge to do something about females of our species, to protect them etc is in our genes. When environment is changing, we adjust some things (e.g. working (hello Kindergartens fro 200 years…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:04 AM
2

No true scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:59 AM
1

If so, would he take her up on that offer even if he was in a relationship? It depends. Would it make a difference if she was super hot or not? Of course. What percentage of men would always go for it as long as they knew they would get away with it? I doubt things are any different between genders here. The only difference would be on what to consider hot, but if we assume "very hot" for both genders, it will likely be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 08:44 AM
3

tell me exactly what women in society do to men You mean, I need to seriously stick to "gender guild" sexist nonsense? Mkay. An example: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/5ca7zr/terminated_company_says_i_cant_sue_ny/ Which other people with vagina is my wife responsible for, pretty please?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:54 AM
7

Everyone was outraged. Lies. Majority tried to twist it as "buh it's to spread awareness". Despicable. Show me an example Show me an example of girls apologizing for what women did.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:23 PM
-2

My social expectations are not being reinforced on me verbally. Sure, John.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:10 PM
1

Again, no evidence homosexuality is instinctual. I am not going to argue about semantics. "settled science", chuckle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:03 PM
1

And, no. If they cannot help but behave in a way in line with their instincts they are not creatures with higher thought processes In other words, you can cure homosexualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:48 PM
1

Just because women get pregnant doesn't mean that is the cause of their pickier behavior It doesn't. It certainly could be And most likely is. also implies a lack of agency No, it doesn't. We are talking about instincts that were formed within some species as a result of evolution. Things that people are LIKELY to do (or not). If we could change our instincts, we could "cure" homosexualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:32 PM
1

Are you suggesting when you're talking to a man you're calculating the time you're going to spend in terms of parental investment? No. It is called instincts. Parental investment is an explanation of WHY they are that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 12:57 PM
5

I believe women humans, although they are are not so easily influenced or brainwashed, *cannot be brainwashed into * changing own instincts FTFY. I think that the physical standard for attraction and arousal has always been higher Gender with monumentally higher parental investment (years vs minutes for men) is pickier about random bang-bangs. "Standards" is just a shiny packaging for "women have a much much much lower libido, than men". (and please, don't tell me how "women also can be horny". …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 12:37 PM
17

The real reason to be wary of promiscuous men or women is that they're likely to cheat. If a woman with a low body count marries a guy with a high body count, how long would the marriage last before he starts missing the variety of sex from his single days? Consequences of cheating are VERY different. She can always be sure it is her kids. Also, men cannot simply be promiscuous at will, only a minority can. Whereas essentially all women can find a willing sex partner with ease.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:40 AM
7

Feminism is when (something built-in into our genes) care for women / "damsel is in distress, do something, males" gone real toxic. Women are second to none at claiming the victimhood so this is the hands down most successful political movement for now (and ever). Twisting that as something "progressive" is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:39 AM
-2

Yeah. Male parental investment - minutes. Female parental investment - years. That is why any, not too unhealthy (!!!) looking female primate can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual bang-bang partner. Commitment and stuff ("dating" in its real meaning) is very different and is very visible in sexually conservative countries. Heck, was laughing at USSR, but even according to US census, there are more married heterosexual women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:35 AM
–

I genuinely can't believe you actually know how much time it takes. That is because you are biased as F. As for the sock, would you really put it in the washing machine? Maybe throw it away. But ask the kid to use some other means the next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:33 AM
-4

You don't have to even do half those things to get a boyfriend get banged, if you are a woman. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:59 AM
3

Disclaimer: "pick me girls" is how women manifest their (quite measurable) hate towards sexy women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:58 AM
–

because her husband is disabled Amazing way to make a "shoot in the foot" point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:44 AM
–

But jobs aren’t paid based on difficulty? To a point. It is fair to expect something extraordinarily difficult gets more money though. E.g. being a surgeon. The "raising a child d is 1000x harder than any job" is bollocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:43 AM
–

diaper Is a: 1) Very brief part of kids life 2) Normally happens when representative of that "better" gender does not work at all (what women do is 1000x harder than any job men do) No, it isn't. In fact, it is the very opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:42 AM
–

Or you ever had to wash your son's cumsock Oh, FFS, PLEASE. Do you know roughly how much time it would take for you to wipe every surface in your house? Yes. Shit got so automated these days, but the old narratives, from the time one had to wash clothing by hand and in an ice cold water, while husband was working at some hazardous shithole that would likely kill him at an age of 40, still stick.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:39 AM
–

where i live men and women roughly make the same An abstract average man is a combination of: 1) Married dude who earns a lot (30%+ more than that point B guy) 2) Single dude who earns a lot less
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 08:37 AM
2

No. 1) Matriarchy world is still vastly better than "patriarchy" world the way it is presented 2) Old lies are repeated in the imaginary worlds, to make a point about real one. (that men in power somehow care/do anything about other men, who, wait for it, are very very present at the bottom)
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:33 AM
4

As far as I remember before the 2000s (or 90s in some countries) Oh boy... women couldn't work Remind me, why were Kindergartens invented 200 years ago, if "women could not work". Why were EVEN FREAKING KIDS working 100 years ago? Can't? Maybe it's time to question BS that is being poured into your ears? vote, For the overwhelming part of human history, neither women NOR 99% MEN could vote. have higher education As above. As soon as it has become something massive, women got onboard too. The onl…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:26 AM
1

Heard Frau Clinton's presidential slogan?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:19 AM
2

it’s supposed to represent the “equality” that women put up with for years Skipping the fact that matriarchy world is "the good one", let's talk about our real world, pretty please. Remind me, by which metric it is women, who are at the bottom? 1) Money spent? 2) Money earned? Is it still OK that it is overwhelmingly MARRIED men who earn more, single ones don't? 3) Incarceration gap? 4) Education gap that we know for a fact is caused by boy hating sexism 5) Lies about DV and sexual victimization…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:13 AM
2

Men's status matters a lot. Woman's status, not even remotely as much. We know it from studies, it is not a stereotype. (and I wish quillette was not paywalled :()
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 08:31 PM
2

My wife said she's not going to watch "that crap". No idea what she knows about the movie, I assume, some trailers put her off.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 08:26 PM
15

which completely defeats the point of feminism I've chuckled. and the idea of equality. It was never an honest idea.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 08:00 PM
1

US? =/
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:23 PM
5

DV is lowest among gays, highest among lesbians, 70% of non-reciprocal (only one partner is violent) DV is perpetrated by women. "not just a male problem", eh? Check out Christina Sommer's: "who stole feminism", it's decades old, but was written during the major push when all the mythology was created. Also notable mention: Erin Pizzey, the founder (!!!) of the first shelter for the victims of DV. Guess who sent hear the death threats.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:19 PM
6

You have to understand, the people that made this movie dont believe misandry exists. It's a made up word. It is still crazy that they imagine the world is "equal" when Kens have absolutely no power. Looks like ideas rather old and sinister are behind it.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:50 PM
11

But they can force 7 years old kids apologize for "bad things committed by their gender". Isn't that progressive? I keep asking "hey, does it make me entitled for what Einstein or Newton did" and nobody answers. I also wonder, what other people with vagina is my wife responsible for.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:46 PM
4

not anti men Oh, is it? But then, why doesn't Ken deserve a seat in a 12 seat Supreme court? Why are ALL positions of power in Barbie's hands?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:43 PM
7

Because people are stupid and most supporters of Barbie are women, presumably feminists. Or rather, on top of many being stupid, there is that. No man in their right mind will disagree with you. I wish that was true.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:39 PM
8

It is a re-hash of the old hateful ideas, check this shit out, the Future if there is one, is female 1) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. 2) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. 3) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human Frau Miller (who also happens to be the founder of the, wait for it, Gender (Grievance) Studies), also, notably, warns against "male bonding": "real danger is in the phenomenon of m…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:36 PM
–

some dudes cant do anything but chase pussy This comment could not have been any more irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 08:41 PM
27

Dunno, here is the first comment I see: She’s allowed to do those things and you’re allowed to not want to date someone who does them. You just aren’t compatible. Move on I don't see an issue with that. Couple of comments above are of th esame sort. Perhaps crap was not upvoted?
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:16 PM
1

what other women find attractive and the approval of their peers completely discredits their whole “we can’t control who we are attracted to” narrative. Oh please. Have you seen women in love? (well, admittedly, I only recall rather young ladies in that state). It is one hell of a force. "I'd change my mind, because my circle didn't like him" is not how that works. Just my opinion though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 07:56 PM
1

Yes, but that is why I've mentioned "non-ignorable share". Non ignorable in the sense that it could not be written off to fluctuations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 07:53 PM
1

There isn't one. That's what I was trying to clarify, thank you. Did you understand what I wrote? Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 07:42 PM
1

Indeed, Porn is very different (and even if it was unrealistic, who cares). Heck, there is gazillion of home made videos of actual couples bang-banging. The "unhealthy" part is also... dubious a statement. And before people go bananas, also check female side of porn, you know. The erotic books. A freaking 1 billion industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 03:26 PM
1

Do you believe in hierarchy? I don't think I get the question. Do you think its "just and right" for one man to have more wealth than kings and empires, for doing nothing? No. But I also know how "well" the other approaches fared. Do you think capitalism is good? As with democracy, meh system, but the best we have invented so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 12:01 PM
1

You demonstrably don't know much about Korea either, so that's a bit awkward. Oh. but Ok. ommunism can only succeed as an international project Where can I see the successful communism project?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 11:59 AM
1

Of course not. Reminds me about British women who were protesting against having EQUAL retirement age (women used to retire 5 years earlier and, yeah, that on top of living on average for 5 years more), yet had "equality" in the groups name.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 11:58 AM
1

I didn't get the answer to "was it all wrong sorts of communism", but I tend to think the answer is "yes". So the right sort might exist, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 08:31 PM
1

You realize I'm a black pilled male right? No. I don't know what it even means, nor why who I am and who are even matter. I could imagine it could be easier to get what one is trying to communicate though. I don't advocate for teens to have sex early teenagers I'm literally pointing out that it is happening more and getting worse. Next gen has less, not more sex, say the stats. So how is that "happening more" pretty please? Me and op are saying men only get less attractive if they're older Men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:50 PM
1

North Korea isnt communist. Right. Neither was USSR (I'm from USSR by the way). They were building it. Choo-choo. I think, original plan by Mr Khruschiov was to build it in 15 or 20 years or so. Starting some time in 50s. There is tons and tons of different schools of thought when it comes to communism and socialism. I see. So the issue with pretty much all known schools of communism that were applied in practice, including USSR, all the countries in Easter Europe including Eastern Germany, Kore…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:42 PM
2

Yeah, well, it's a bit awkward then. But basically. There is that North Korea. Which happens to be communist. And then there is South Korea. Which happens to be, well, capitalist. And that goes on for 7 decades. We also used to have that Western, capitalist Germany and Eastern, well, Communist Germany. Have you heard how it panned out?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:28 PM
1

Of course you once again try to bait someone into a battle of ethics. Mm, yeah, well, that's non-intentional. I don't have any horse in that race as it is way too subjective. You're strawmanning to dismiss the fact that many behaviors can be curbed. Ah, the "we can outgrow our instincts". Thinks such eating more than one needs, perhaps? And losing weight/not regaining it? What is the success rate, less than 1 in 100, I was told? So, welp? You can say, hey, but that's one hell of an instinct, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:26 PM
1

It's in opinions realm, but I don't see how that is the only viable strategy. It also doesn't explain why we have a non-ignorable share of men with little to no attachment to own offspring, cuckoo style.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:17 PM
1

Gossiping is one of the items in women vs women competition arsenal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_intrasexual_competition#Competitor_derogation Male vs male competition is more open (and more brutal).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:02 PM
–

You don't exactly need a lot of practice to pick up a crying baby 1) That's relevant to only a very short period of the time. 2) It is woman who does NOT work at that time, normally 3) It is men who works FULL TIME at that time, normally Having to pick such a bizarrely irrelevant example in this context is quite telling: you are cherry picking stuff to make a point. It is just re-hash of "women is more important" sexist nonsense, completely disregarding male effort. You can see women who think t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:46 PM
1

Growing from our instincts is all we're meant to do in todays society especially ones that hurt others or yourself. That is "teaching how to not be homosexual" levels of naive. Younger women are having consensual sex earlier and earlier Why did you switch from "more" to "earlier" please? (likely as false, but also irrelevant) Perhaps I'm crazy but The numbers simply don't seem truthful to me. 77% of men are hooking up but only 22% of women are? Who are the men hooking up with? If you are referri…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:41 PM
1

If you put a hot, beautiful woman, hugging a muscular, tall man, that woman is no longer attractive to other men. Huh? What? Men somehow stop seeing her as hot and sexy? I can see the very female line of thought behind it, but, well, erm, no. That doesn't change anything. I also doubt it is any different if genders are swapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:35 PM
1

if you listen to people talking about equity and equality im not so sure if they are able to differentiate it or if they push a certain dubious agenda... That's the people I referred to as "oppression charlatans". that said how do you measure equality or fairness at a society level if our struggles and starting points are different? Well, my approach is: swap the genders. Is it "if some gender is under-represented/or struggling, we should address that", or is it "if it is only that particular ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:33 PM
2

At every single moment, our society is having a conflict due to the contradiction of one class and another. I think Koreans have a lot to share with you, stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:26 PM
4

Maybe I'm on edited version, but here it is: Misandry (/mɪˈsændri/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men.[1][2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misandry
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:26 PM
1

No. I've never claimed that "all" women do it like that. The OP is about wives, who have a choice, having some for fun employments. (small businesses or not) It is such a common thing that I cannot imagine people who don't see examples of it around. The stats you have referenced, namely who "owns" businesses (whatever the real figure is) is absolutely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:15 PM
–

You know home-making is quite a gig, right? Only when it's a woman doing home-making, ok? Like, you can do that and work part-time building a small business that is an investment in the future for both of you and still be hugely contributing to the comfort, finances, and lifestyle of your "working" partner, right? Like it's up to you to do or not to do it, and in which sphere to do it, as nobody forces you to do anything and if you do it, you do it, because you enjoy it kind of things. Luxury th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:05 PM
–

I'm neither your bro, nor trolling. In fact, I"m arguing in good faith. If you bring good arguments, I'll happily read it, agree with you and say, hey, today I've learned something new.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 02:55 PM
–

What does this mean? Welp, see, we have stores here, that only let businesses in. (*e.g. Metro) Those two ladies are legally registered as small businesses, and are even kind enough to let friends from their circle use their registration to be able to, well, enter such stores. And what kind of photography and fitness are we talking about? "Wanna have good photos of ya? Pay me" kind of photography, all sorts of as far as I can see, from just hanging out in a garden to, although, rarely, things li…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 02:54 PM
–

There are 13 million women owned businesses Yeah, the question is,how many "women owned AND FOUNDED" businesses are over there. Given that only 3% of the entrepreneurs are women. (hilarious, finding a source for it is a struggle now, a lot of spin-spin-spin-deflect lies like "women are 7 times 'more likely" to be killed by intimate partner, when in reality, 1 in 3 killed is a man. Missing bit? More likely than be killed in some other situation.) manosphere Whatever that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 02:40 PM
8

Welp, fairness is equality (true one, not the one pushed by oppression charlatans), it doesn't need to be "identical" to be equal. It is equal, when interests and well being of both partners is weighted equally important.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:54 PM
2

Ok, read wold example, from, got submit, video posted on reddit. A moral choice, should you or your spouse die, if one of the two has to You don't need to lookup the video, to figure out how the answers looked like. That doesn't count as "equals" to me. Understandably, there are good biological reasons for such behavior (men are much easier to replace in reproduction cycle), but nevertheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:51 PM
–

You have literally denied Melinda and that other Frau founded their businesses. Which is quite telling in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:36 PM
–

There are plenty of women who support their husbands/partners through starting a business. Yeah, right. That is why next to zero of the famous entrepreneurs got there through female partner support. I wish everyone in this sub could see FemaleDatingStragegy sub, to see how it looks like when women are sharing openly about such things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:24 PM
–

Do you know any women personally who run small businesses? Yes (at least, per German law). Two wives in my circle have small businesses. One is doing photography, another one fitness thing. One has never really worked full time if at all, the other toned down her working ours drastically, after her husband started getting much more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:21 PM
2

The point being made is that wanting relationships is the natural thing to want to do, How is random hookups not a valid strategy for male primates? And if so, how is sticking with just one female the best strategy for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:17 PM
1

No, literally not too unhealthy, but that might include certain morbid obesity levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:56 PM
1

Those women need to be sexually available to said man. Why would that be, when we are talking about perception. Men are absolutely attracted to women that do crazy things in bed In other words, could you pretend that "crazy" referred to "being open to experiments in bed" No.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:52 PM
–

So your examples of a woman running a small business is a man started a small business and getting divorced?! Are you undermining the activities of Frau Melinda Gates and, sorry, don't remember that other great lady's name? That is very sexist of you! That is, in fact, how female entrepreneurship NORMALLY works. A small, no strings-no risks attached, covered by husband, in case things happen. Because being risk averse is a gender trait (means, on average, not every single one imaginable, e.g. Me…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:51 PM
–

It's not a serious question, for women, of course the first (as any, not too unhealthy looking woman, can walk into a bar and find a willing bang-bang partner). It is the other way around for men. It has something to do with the way primates reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:52 PM
-3

it just came with the flexibility necessary No. It happens when there are no kids too. And it is one sided, you will struggle and might never find a couple where men would go "oh, honey, you are making so much money, let me quit my work and seek something new". (some dude who bangs grandma Madonna doesn't count, obviously)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:50 PM
-11

Dudes think running a small business is easy?! The fuck?? No. If a woman does it. If a women does something, it is, in fact, very very hard. E.g. Bezos' wife. She married him when he was an established millionaire and was writing some crap for fun, but was absolutely crucial in establishing amazon (somehow). Or the lady Melinda, who married an established millionaire and founder of Microsoft. Whatever she was doing for fun was, in fact, very very hard. But to give examples nearby, heck, of 6 clo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:48 PM
-1

Statistically, the higher the husbands income, the sharper the wife's post-marriage income drop, up to not working at all. And you may want to check this shit out (also note the "IKWALITY" part of it).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:41 PM
-1

That’s probably because none of them are absolutely unfuckable for whatever reason. For someone that is fuckable, getting laid is so much easier than getting into a relationship, so you’ll just do that. So, essentially, the point being made is that some guys struggle to get laid without "wanting relationships" so they start "wanting relationships" as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:07 PM
1

Literally every guy I know (at least in my friend groups of about 30 guys) that are in the early 20s category does not just want ons. They are like "single night bang-bang? Why would I do that? That's immoral!", right? Very rare kind of friends you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:06 PM
1

Men are attracted to good looking (healthy, young, fertile) women. What is in her had, doesn't change her attractiveness. It is a lie that men are somehow MORE attracted to crazier women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:45 PM
21

Briffault's Law Google it. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:37 PM
0

Most of my interactions here have been with guys saying that women are delusional, gaslighters, liars, etc. So the natural question that popped up in my mind is: do you guys even like women? It is about sex drive. Female attractiveness comes down to signaling health/youth. "Great personality" is not part of it. (not like women would care about male "great personality" either)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:33 PM
1

Not my faukt they picked the lifestyle It is more nuanced than that, I think. One cannot "fix" own instincts. Also if you want to play the depression olympics I point you to the discussed but never really fixed mens suicide rate. Men value own life much less than women in general, hence, no wonder, that they part with it easier than women. But, as far as happiness and unhappiness goes, men are less happy and more unhappy (different stats) than before, naturally. Although, hilariously, now the ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:22 PM
1

men who want a relationship I would have said "there are no such men", but then, there are men with 2 dicks and also men who want to bang grannies (and let me stay within legal realm of what men want). Wanting "relationship" pales in comparison to "wanting to bang bang". It is very very vice versa for women. She can find intimate companionship easily. Repeat that ad nauseam. That will somehow equate "relationships" to "in a large enough group of men, there will be at least some who would bang me…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:17 PM
1

Women are depressed Yep, measurably. And it is getting worse. because they are too picky? Nah, that's definitely not the reason. As that is not something that has changed. backfired like hell Life is hard. There is a bit of karma to it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 05:21 PM
1

with a woman attention is guaranteed. Yes. "Attention". Of "would bang" kind. Oh, and also, that attention quickly goes down with age, I was told by a seasoned feminist who looks like she longs for that attention. average men actually have to take what they can get Most men, average or not, bang as much as they can. There are amazing biological reasons for that. Even despite the fact women find less meen attractive than men find women No, not despite, DUE TO. Due to the fact majority of women fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 05:19 PM
1

available for dating Ok, once again. They are not available for hookups. Something that benefits men (from the evolution perspective) and is absolutely nonsensical from the female perspective (unless male has outstanding genes and there we go again). if that is what you are trying to say. I have said, what I was "trying to" say, and even tried to rephrase it, but to no avail it seems. you don't have to use dating apps exclusively for hook-ups. It doesn't matter what one uses for. Women are inter…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 05:10 PM
1

sleeping around Because pills and condoms were invented some decades ago, which is, obviously, more than enough time for our genes and instincts to adapt! Oh yeah, except, nah. more and more women are Reporting being unhappy, mentally unstable, and on anti-depressant. In fact, 58% of people consuming anti-depressants in the US (one of the record high consumer of the said substances) are women aged 45+. It is a hilarious argument to make in the "hey, there is a huge supply/demand disparity on hoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 05:05 PM
0

You haven't said anything to prove him wrong, though. I have, you've just missed it. Something with 50 in it. Men are largely on dating apps, but that doesn't equal chances or opportunities. Ah. Women, who risk getting pregnant, carrying baby that resembles that dude they didn't even like that much, for 9 month and then bringing them up, are somewhat less interested in hook-ups. Who would have thought. But "to date" means "random hookups" right? So it's yet another re-hash of "women have much lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 08:44 PM
2

The numbers also don’t say that. Slightly more women than men were sexless in the most recent GSS. That is the moment what that "potential" kicks in, lol. Any, not too unhealthy looking woman, can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual sex partner. That is because it is 9+ month and god knows what vs, you know, that short time spent in sexual act with only positive consequences of leaving an offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 08:32 PM
1

our brains only register “potential” average Our brains assess how someone could be if he/she would work out using methods that, wait for it: were discovered less than 100 years ago That makes sense to you, cough? :)))) Women have LOWER libido (still horny, but not compared to men) than men. So an average young woman is aroused as often and by as attractive percentile, as, say, a man in mid 50s. And that is, because of INSANE consequences that happen after women has sex. As opposed to men. And e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 08:29 PM
–

This sub is fairly curious. It popped up as something that both: 1) MensRights subreddit users and 2) FemaleDatingStrategy (men hating cisspot) actively visit. (in "data is beautiful". Notably, mods have deleted the fact that the second sub has a major overlap with mental health subreddits)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 07:26 PM
1

i feel like this is common sense. maybe a lot of people weren’t raised right As shown by the OP seeing some "skit" in which some guy JOKED about things. This sub feels like readers are drunk today...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 07:03 PM
1

I think Average men need to settle more often than not because they're also undesirable. Unlike women, right? Who have hordes of men desiring committed relationships with them... :))) Women find only 1 in 5 men attractive. Men find 85% of women attractive or very attractive. It is women who "settle" Or, well, stay single, and, yeah, sorry to say it, but 58% of people consuming anti-depressants for 5+ straight years in US, are women aged 45+.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:58 PM
4

But an attractive guy who maintains a solid physique and is also high earning? The world is his oyster Indeed, and no "biological clocks" in sight, what a weird OP, I am not even sure if someone is trolling or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:55 PM
-2

Of course not. And, OMG: Men do not get the same chances or opportunites as women to date You can't be serious... We have close to 50/50 split, yet one half somehow has "better chances" eh? I've seen many delusional OPs on this sub, but this one is something... somewhat outstanding in that sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:54 PM
1

Women constantly assert that men have inflated self images, yet it is abundantly clear that most men are desperate and have zero standards. That's false and false. ("abundantly clear", lol) Evolution wants to have a word for you. 1) For most male primates "winner takes it all", so, risk acceptance is high. 2) It's not the case for female primates. Hence most are risk averse. 3) It makes perfect sense for a male primate to bang-bang as many healthy females as possible 4) It makes exactly zero sen…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 07:53 PM
0

I'm pretty sure that's nearly 70% in the USA and 62% in the UK. Still quite uneven to write it off to mere fluctuations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 05:55 PM
1

Briffault's law, Thanks for mentioning it, curious read. In a way, explains why only women, but not men, are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 05:49 PM
2

Yea, many of these guys have very strange expectations. I'm trying to follow you, with various takes on what you could possibly mean, but I have failed so far. What sort of "expectations" do you mean? Men have one hell of sex drive, compared to women (majority of who is also quite horny, mind you, but it pales in comparison). They see things, they react. In this case, older women. They are naturally less attractive (biology is a b*tch) being less fertile. That sort of reaction is what one would …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 05:44 PM
1

I have never seen any such post. However, I've noticed curious trend of "progressive" movies showing bizarre "young man + granny" couples (e.g. S1 of Umbrella Academy). There is also a non-stopping b*tching about how Di Caprio likes younger women. Which gets insanely hypocritical. And also plenty of butthurt reaction to "female attractiveness peaks at early 20s" (which is a finding and not something some imaginary "Red Piller Nazi Hitler Mysogynist Tate Johnson" made up) People cannot change wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 05:38 PM
1

"Why should we listen to femcels on what is right and what is wrong" is a valid argument.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:30 PM
1

I have a better idea. Call feminists: Femcels Which vast majority of them actually are. Argument about incels goes like "buh you hate women, cause you can't get laid". It should similarly apply to women who have failed to find a partner.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:04 PM
1

Real people in the wild didn't look 'muscly' or whatever view of idealized masculinity you have. Huh? Native Indians in the movies, I was told, are pretty spot on, have slim, quite muscular bodies too. People need to stop pretending that our attractiveness preferences can be easily induced by society. If that was the case, we would be able to "teach" gays to be heterosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 04:00 PM
1

No, sorry. Just came across that in other discussion, when it was contrasted with Norway (where the figure is only 10%). Didn't have reasons to mistrust the user posting that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 08:29 AM
1

What femcel group? The one claiming they are fighting for "equality". Most of the time they call themselves "feminists". Also 'femcel' but also happened to get married, how does that make any sense? Well, married as an episode, or current status? If the latter, you are not a femcel. Women have a very strong in group gender bias. Also, being told about all those lovely things about male conspiracies to keep women down from your childhood undoubtedly had an impact. But you are, by no means, one of…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:35 PM
0

Women end up poorer after divorce Yeah. I mean, nonsensical ain't it, but there is a femcel group that managed to "calculate" it that way. The way it worked: "dude lives in a sh*thole as he cannot afford proper house, mm, wait, so the UPKEEP on the house is ON WOMAN NOW" I cannot grasp how people take that sort of nonsense seriously. 90% of UK divorces end up fighting over kids custody. That is showing to what extent "men don't want" custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:17 PM
6

That "there is no way of knowing it", something that looks like a lame attempt to twist clear facts at hand. It is overwhelmingly men who lose significant part of their income, their house and even access to kids. No wonder it is mostly women filing for divorce. There is more to it, but it's a bit too nuanced for this branch.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 01:31 PM
5

Threads like this are hilarious. A bunch of guys who struggle to get matches on dating sites arguing about alimony as if it’s something they’ll ever have to deal with. As opposed to a bunch of gals who struggle get... wait for it... matches on "like me like I am, not just bang me" are somehow absolutely experts in the area. Or the whole Feminist movement, basically #femcels, teaching people how to do things right, while openly talking about plans like "let's reduce population of men to 10%". Oh,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 12:14 PM
5

On paper I think women absolutely deserve permanent alimony. It is ironic how people forget that, also on paper, gender has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 12:12 PM
-1

you dumbasses are the ones promoting the "women should be submissive housewives and mothers" I thought it was a strawman. Never seen murican conservative say that, always "liberals" or trollos.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 12:11 PM
3

Women file the paper work for the divorce, no way of knowing who started the divorce That seems unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 12:07 PM
17

Reminder: by directly linking articles, you are promoting them.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:39 AM
1

TIL "super reach" men are up for grabs for an average woman, so it is surprising they settle for less. Thank you, PPD! Also, #IKWALITY
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 05:06 AM
-19

It is absolutely not normal for females of our species to randomly f*ck around, mkay? This leads to majority of them avoiding such "dating" strategies, which, consequently, leads to monumental supply/demand discrepancy in the "I want to bang bang" market. What really confuses me is that a lot of these women openly profess to want a permanent relationship, Uh, well, guess what... How is that a MHRA issue anyway?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:01 AM
2

We should refer to circumcision with what it is: male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 01:10 PM
0

She replied “i was too drunk to consent to anything “ Guess who invented that wonderful "I'm not responsible for my deeds, if drunk"... BelieveAllPeopleOfCertainGender
/r/MensRights02/05/23 03:43 PM
1

you cannot change x For the same reason you cannot "teach" people to stop being homosexual (or become ones). We can change how we act, but we cannot change how we feel. We do feel that women are the "more valuable" gender. (proto-feminists were less shy about that and were stating it point blank, it is hilarious that women are dubbed "oppressed" today, and in the Western society, no less, and yeah, I've seen the Apex Fallacy and other wunderarguments already)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:52 PM
2

The reason why sexism is unstoppable is because both misogynists and misandrists will fuel each other. I disagree. If you define sexism as treating one gender better than the other, there are 2 effects at play: 1) Very strong pro-female bias in women. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men? 2) General pro-female bias in society. Women are Wonderful Effect This is how we feel about female individuals of our species, which, mind you, also happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:51 PM
3

Hypergamy IS A TRAIT. It is not a choice. It cannot just "discontinue". If only a minority of men reproduce There isn't a single country where that's the case. The worst I know is Norway, namely: 1) 26% are childless (up from 16%) 2) 16% of women are childless (up from 14%) That's by no means "majority", not even remotely. People should stop mistaking female sexual interest (It HAS TO BE RELATIVELY LOW DAMN IT! LOOK AT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SEX!) with mating in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:42 PM
2

theres like one poor low number study that says this Oh boy. You aren't even trying, are you? Effing CDC reports 43% of lesbians experienced physical violence Compared to: in the U.S., 26% of gay men and 37.3% of bisexual men said that they experienced physical violence Source: The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:35 PM
1

I'm in no way saying it's men's fault, but if a women ever hits me I let her know right there and then that if she ever does that again I'm out. Johnny Depp would have something to tell you about that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:34 PM
2

They can be emboldened by the fact that officers usually respond to these to arrest the man, regardless of who initiated the altercation. I recall the stats that the MOST likely outcome, if the man called for help, is for him to be arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:33 PM
2

You can count of the fingers of one hand how many women have been executed for killing a man. I don't get if you were trying to bring in gender incarceration gap into the pic, or what was your intention. Yes, women are much more likely to avoid jail altogether and get probation and when not, still get VASTLY shorter sentences. Female murderers also have gender special "I was acting in self defense" card.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:29 PM
3

I've done the same thing with exes and even female friends of mine, every time they hurt themselves way more than they hurt me. Next time ask them to hit you in you nose, eyes, jaw. Balls perhaps. If that still doesn't impress you, ask them to throw a bottle or something heavier, or use a frying pan when hitting you. If that still doesn't impress you much, ask them to use a knife. Still not impressed? Ask to drive over you. Twice. No worries, she'll likely not go to jail anyway, even if you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:27 PM
1

Men are thought to never hit a girl because the damage will almost always great due to difference in physical strength. Major physical strength difference (on average! as a female kickboxing champion can single hit knock out majority of men in most countries) appears only after puberty, when testosterone kicks in. It is also insane to assume that men being stronger somehow makes them not vulnerable to attacks. This big guy was killed by that little weak woman. Oh, and police wrote it off as "she…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:24 PM
1

a questionnaire was done and about 30% ish of people don't feel a woman hitting a man is domestic violence. Nor do they at Netflix. Or, rather, as there is definitely a bunch of DEI folks pushing agendas, it's part of the agenda... Just look at this ("totally acceptable" DV scene from "Diplomat", apparently the victim being a man makes it absolutely fine and not a crime).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:21 PM
1

I am very safe, thank you, just happen to be rather sensitive to things like basic fairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:13 PM
1

Why do you believe people think it's negative to have a friend like a brother? "People" don't think it, normally it's some very specific people are projecting their toxic femininity. Old friends, family members, even hobbies are the "competitors". Of course not every woman is like that. As for why, because: "does she care about me" instinct (that makes perfect sense, given what it took our ancestors and women in particular to bring up a child for 99.999% of our history as species)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:36 PM
1

Your comment history The fact that you don't even get it's wrong to attack opponent, not the argument, is quite appalling. If you feel urge to respond to my other comments - respond to those other comments, doh. I think you need I don't care. If you aren’t getting attention, you aren’t wanted by women. What on Earth is this about... Most people have moved on from the 1900s sexual standards. Exactly 0 of the instincts of our species have changed since 1900s. I'm sorry if it goes against dogma's y…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:31 PM
1

Why would Germans leave Germany "for job" pretty please? I mean, unless you mean for Switzerland.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:11 AM
1

Yet elephants are still a bit more aggressive than humans, and show less empathy. There is no objective way to measure empathy. There are also very different elephants. They don't have "bros" That some people think that men having bonds with other men is somehow negative shows just how broken our world is. Regarding fairy tales and horror stories from the past, some humans can do horrible things. We know for a fact most people can do horrible things, it's a matter of when it is worth it. Ruzzian…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:10 AM
1

Hypergamy is fundamentally bullshit, it can literally be unproven by… touching grass Yeah. Except you have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:03 AM
1

Your comment though implies that the girl doesn’t abort assuming several layers of birth control didn’t work. Abort, pills and anything else, that was totally absent for 99.99% of our history as species has 0, not even 0.01% relevance. It is about instincts. Those change ages to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:00 AM
1

her prospects for an LTR or marriage are still much much better. I never understood how to twist it so that it could even remotely work. I guess the naive conclusions from libido gap are just so strong, people somehow fit that into minds. Oh, yeah, that and 58% of people in the US who consume anti-depressants for 5+ years straight are white women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 10:59 AM
0

redpil is bullshit Imaginary redpil is bullshit. A lot of what is regarded as redpil in this sub is solid science. E.g. "hybergamy" that came out of studying gender mating preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:51 AM
4

This is lies because why not get sex from a man then? Because contrary to the common narratives by known oppression charlatans and "fighters for equality", there is a monumental libido gap between genders. And it's not "because society", but "because biology". If consequences of sex for men would be getting knocked out for 9 month and then getting a baby that resembles that girl he didn't even like that much later on, they would be much much pickier about bang-bang. Heck, we have examples from o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:50 AM
1

Yeah, but men put up with it because they want sex more than women. It is more nuanced than that. Built in need for a women to know "he cares about me" is a biological trait. That bit exist regardless of whether man wants to bang or not. Apparently there is inherent imbalance in relationships and shit ca get toxic very quickly (and it often does) with "toxic femininity" kicking in and demanding more and more focus on herself. That's why "forced to break up ways with friends", "is upset I'm into …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:47 AM
1

The truth is that emancipation did close to Zero to men, as certain man hating charlatans managed to push the narrative that men are exclusively the privileged oppressors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:44 AM
1

A 4/10 woman will still have a significant amount of men willing to date or wife her up To bang yes, to wife up no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 08:43 AM
1

I have. If you only wanted to hear from people who agree with your POV, perhaps you should indicate so in the OP or, rather, avoid opening any threads to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 03:00 PM
0

feminine looking faces I don't see the face in the video as "feminine" one bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 02:40 PM
4

pressure from society’s unrealistic beauty standards. It's as if you weren't responding to the parent and just copy pasted it from some mislead conversation. Female instinct of "having to" look attractive has nothing to do with standards applied in practice being even remotely unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 02:39 PM
3

She's average. But the average is still attractive to most guys. She's meh. But men would BANG even meh. No, men don't find meh beautiful. Although, there are exceptions for SOME celebrities, like Diana.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 02:37 PM
1

Women and this sub tends to mistake "would bang" with "finds beautiful" ... =/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 02:36 PM
1

Why would there be any?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 02:06 PM
1

Standards to measure up are in ones head/eyes, IMO. So it comes down how much of external semi-randomly picked up things you want to apply to yourself. Also, people need to stop judging own attractiveness by using those swipe left/right apps, it is terribly skewed and about random hookups, something that most men are eager to do and most women absolutely not and both parties for good biological reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:59 AM
1

based off of dehumanizing traits "Objectification" right? As in "let us claim certain things we are insecure about to be inherently evil, who cares if they signal health and fertility".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:29 AM
1

most of the women on this forum are 1) We have no idea 2) It doesn't matter (doesn't make anything right, nor wrong)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:27 AM
2

This sort of OPs on mystical "manospheres" MUST come with bloody examples! Else it is a crazy strawman on steroids. Make anything up, attach the nonsensical label, proceed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:26 AM
2

It's not even close. Yeah, if you deliberately cherry pick stuff, it's "not even close". And we are kindly avoiding the fact men spend more time at work AND commuting to work and doing overtime, some of it at home. Since obviously the money they earn is for them personally. Oh, a "fun fact": it is strictly MARRIED men who earn more (about 30% more than single). Or rather, it used to be, before "affirmative actions": for the last year, the group earning most in US is Asian Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:20 AM
2

Yeah. And we have random reddit posters exhibiting extreme anti-male sexism as the measure of how much of the share is the right share.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:17 AM
1

Sorry to hear you are in that situation, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:16 AM
1

It is too common a shit for a heavy lifting for a single guy. It takes women to swap roles to see how much effort working actually is. Try to find a single example of working woman, stay at home men, who asks the wife who returns home from work to do the cooking or other chores. You won't find any. What you can find though, is wife losing her shit when husband invites his friends to a pool party at day hours, while she is working. Now thing about how many husbands would have had problem with tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:15 AM
5

Not only does it not take hours and not only do men help most of the time if not even do it, but most of the laundry is actually female stuff. Underwear aside, men don't feel the need to wash stuff even remotely as frequently. And it is still, load the device and let it do things, all the preparation you've mentioned simply does not take multiple hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:13 AM
3

if I was attacked I want to say that you are by far not the only person showing insane bias in these comments, but at the same time one of the most active ones. Could you tone down your insane bias please?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:10 AM
2

No, it's just women having that built-in "he gotta do things" that makes them not see what men is doing. A friend of mine, who has literally BUILT A FREAKING HOUSE using his hands, is an active hunter (family is scared with documentaries about meat production, guess what) built insane stuff at home (centralized vacuum cleaning, as it's not as loud and has other benefits). Now, even THAT guy is saying "there are two things my wife would not forgive me: that I cheat or that I am having rest and do…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:09 AM
2

The time spent commuting alone shows what is at play here. Curiously, the same Mr Farrel described all that in his "Why Men Earn More" book. Another lovely effect: women tend to work less, after getting married (no blame here, just facts). However, THE MORE husband works, the more drastic the change is. Up to quitting working at all. Also, notable read. They weren't even married and it's insane how misandrist Canada is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:05 AM
2

This is very rare as well I hope it was sarcasm and welcome to Planet Earth, if not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 10:02 AM
7

The fact that husband working, while wife just stays home, is not considered, shows just how insanely sexist the common narrative is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 12:04 PM
5

I have a mature partner So, a jab at people who disagree with you on chores being immature. Yay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 12:01 PM
6

So would you rather be in charge of laundry every week or buying paint once every 2 years? Assuming this is not trolling (it feels like) and you are genuinely lost in Warren Farrel's argument, let me help you: It is absolutely not about one single activity that you can deliberately pick up on one side, grab some other one on the other side, and claim, aha, look who does more. Laundry is a peculiar example as it used to, you know, literally take ours of an actual labor to wash things. Things chan…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:59 AM
3

Unless you’re doing it multiple times a week, laundry takes the whole day. No it doesn't. If it takes you the whole day (I mean, are we seriously counting time it takes MACHINES do work?) to do laundry for a family of 4, maybe you should buy bigger machines.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:57 AM
3

than opening a jar Yeah. That only and the most common thing men do. Lazy bastards!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:56 AM
5

Your list is funny because you'd be hard-pressed to find a man who does even half of these That's a lovely way to miss the point. It is a list of thing many men do, but it isn't considered work. It doesn't describe an imaginary men, who walks out there on the streets in hundreds of millions and is doing all of that, what a weird strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:54 AM
7

Most of the things you listed are done once every blue moon or are not chores at all. And those that are not, you can brush off by anecdotal evidence or bizarre habits in some place out there somewhere where "instead, women do it". Fairly convenient, but not very convincing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:52 AM
10

This is very rare in this day and age. I certainly don't. Many women who have the luxury of choosing work closer to the home, less working hours, lower/no overtime expectations, less stress tend to not think of it as "living off husband's money". It doesn't change the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:49 AM
4

Plenty of German women with African boyfriend/men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:34 AM
1

The idea that someone might not be "worthy" of having a partner of the opposite gender is utterly insulting. I often hear this request from men (mostly online - I live in a very progressive city) wanting women to be more traditional, and assume a subordinate role in romantic relationships. That is absolutely not how I view the "traditional" relationships. What you see now is, in fact, as traditional as it gets (men need to demonstrate ability and commitment to provide resources, high interest in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:40 AM
1

Im genuinely confused why women and society get so angry at these men I have never seen a man get angry at other men for their height, doh. Why women seek men that are taller then them (only 4% state they are accepting of a potential date being shorter then them... I wonder how tall the said 4% are) is understandable from evolution perspective.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:35 AM
1

I'm confused, weren't we talking about equal laws? and domestic violence? and how we should protect all victims? how does income affect this? It's an example of yet another big lie, by the same group. Lies that are as widely spread. No other species shows so much empathy and care towards the members of the group the way humans do (and that is wonderful). Elephants? We do have some empathy, but... have you ever thought just how horrifying many old fairly tales are? Parents sending own kids to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 08:52 AM
6

more time off to focus on being the primary care giver Or, you know, enjoy life.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:44 AM
8

Which University is it?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:44 AM
1

"Incel violence", eh? My freaking god, just how detached from reality the whole "manosphere" bazinga myth is...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:31 AM
1

Notable read: Fifty years of lies about domestic violence As far as I know most countries slowly reach equality or at least they are trying. By metrics enacted by charlatans, who, among other things, claim that my spouse, who happens to spend about twice as much as I do on personal needs from our shared budget and works less and not as hard hours as me, is "oppressed" since I bring more money into our shared budget. The "Why Men Earn More" books is more than two decades old... Regarding violence…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 04:06 PM
2

Misogyny was never the thing that oppression charlatans claimed it was, I'm sorry. They've published a chapter from Mein Kampf, with Jews replaced with Men in a peer reviewed (!!!) feminist journal, no less. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair Actually the lady who did the ultrasound of my groin told me a story about how her male friend was literally stabbed in his own home by a woman he had over and when his roommate called the police they actually arrested the guy who was st…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:01 PM
1

Even if my post contained nothing misogynistic? That's a hilarious comment, in a way.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:55 PM
1

I'm not from US Me neither. DV Laws are gender asymmettric across the world. "Istanbul Convention". I think we should try to stop violence against anyone. But it's actually hard, because I believe a lot of violence comes from mental illnesses or disorders. Agreed, we should try. But lying about reasons violence happens is not helping. I will set aside the point of men's human rights violation happening by enacting gender asymmetric laws. I don't think majority of violent people are mentally ill,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:49 AM
2

you're pretty awful At your twisted takes on events, in which women "were forced to sit home" yet we somehow needed Kindergartens 200 years ago. women were raped Ah. That's why next to nobody knows genocide was about slaughtering men and boys. I see. It wasn't a genocide directed at males I am freaking speechless on how someone can even type this kind of sentence in this context... Sexual violence Is one of the most notorious myths by the oppression charlatans. Called out in great detail by rene…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:38 AM
1

Are most stereotypes spot on? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:35 AM
2

You mean bashing boys for decades could have negative consequences? https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 03:38 PM
1

I understand so you think it's because of ideology. There is a lot of it. Money too. US alone since mid 90s spends 1+ billion a year on "fighting violence... against women". Well, not all people conform to that part of the ideology, or the subdomains of that ideology. People don't, but governments did. Gender asymmetric domestic violence laws is the reality we live in. And if you search articles on google about that trial and look at the comments, most people don't agree with Amber Heard Yes, as…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 03:33 PM
1

I don’t listen to them. Then, perhaps, you should not fantasize about what they are saying... :)))
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:51 PM
2

I wonder what made them choose to do this. Did they really think she was innocent? One of the foundational "achievements" of Feminism (described in great detail in Christina Sommer's book "Who Stole Feminism", I'd refer to her as renegade feminist) is the monumental lie about domestic violence. You can't make it up: the founder of the first shelter for victims of DV, Erin Pizzey, had to run from death threats from Fs, for objecting the notion that DV is a single gender issue. The lies weren't ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:49 PM
1

There are more gay men than lesbians Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:32 PM
1

maybe all those “top g -red alphas” didn’t actually know Maybe you should listen to imaginary "red alphas" a bit less.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:20 PM
–

don't enjoy sex If you don't enjoy sex, the problem could also be you, stranger who went personal. The fact that you've made the wonderful jump from "women have much lover libido" to "women cannot enjoy sex" is a problem in your heads, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:20 PM
–

And why dudes think young single women don’t enjoy sex is confusing to me That you need to put weird words into somebodies mouth to make some random point is not amusing me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:18 PM
–

Men can, and do, sabotage pills Lolwhat. How many people have had oral sex since then, without this happening? How many people have had sex without rape happening = rape is not a problem. Amazing "logic".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 02:17 PM
0

I believe she lost that trial hasn't she? That didn't stop a cohort of feminist orgs from stopping to support her, did it? So we probably agree here. I think so, I don't really grasp the concept of "gender guilt". I mean, people are not responsible for deeds of other people with the same genitalia. Including, god forbid, men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 01:04 PM
1

e statistical facts that refute how men’s aggression is a more pressing societal issue right now than PMS Huh. Men frequently demonize Ok. through their misogyny Right. In a world where everything is misogyny, if the right people claim so. disproportionately committed by OTHER MEN Oh please. Cross partner murders in Canada women victims outnumber men 1 to 3. And nobody even tells us how many of those women were killed by other women. DV tops among lesbian couples, minimal among gays, mind you. f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 01:02 PM
-1

Almost all groups have both wonderful people and not so wonderful people, don't you agree? Women can be certified DV perpetrators and there will still be a cohort of organizations that would try to whitewash them. E.g. Amber I Was Not Punching You I Was Hitting You Heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 12:24 PM
-4

Woman have been demonised Never ever. Oh, and if you think "but which hunts", let me break this to you: 1) It was both men and women that were "witches" 2) It was even kids.... 3) Of course male victims were wiped out from human history, the way people don't even know Rwanda genocide was exclusively about killing men 4) It was a lot of women against women activity behind those hunts Women are told that they are exaggerating symtoms or that they are fine since since they really REALLY tend to go …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 12:21 PM
3

you guys would Putting strawiman right into OP is genius, OP. Now you can ran around blaming some imaginary group for whatever, including "if something would happen, then you'd do that" with no pushback whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 12:16 PM
3

constantly paints ... as helpless victims Oh, the irony...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 12:14 PM
2

You've cherry picked some random sh*t on top of most of the stuff (e.g. hypergamy) referred by some as "TRP" is an actual scientific finding.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 12:07 PM
0

"Epidemic of sexless men", give me a f*cking break. Boys are pounded at school, men are effed all across the board and the only thing you've come up with is that number of sex acts is lower than one wished it would be. Feminism has completely ruined dating. That swipe left/right shit has completely ruined some brains into thinking random hook-ups are something even remotely normal for females of our species.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:04 PM
11

It is notorious women's interests > men's interests accompanied by whining about how oppressed the former are, somehow. But another aspect is also at play: if government cannot find a male human to pay for that, it would need to pay from the budget, something that they tend to not want to do, rampant misandry aside.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 12:35 PM
9

Become fuckable as a dude. Women have much lower libido. There is no "fixing" it. If it would be men who would get pregnant from it (yes, there are species where parental investment is skewed the other way around) they would be much pickier too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 07:03 PM
6

Tinder population is overwhelmingly male, mkay? I mean, seriously, how could it be any different than "women have it easier... on Tinder"?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 07:00 PM
0

Lolz. We have roughly the same number of men and women. Number of LGBTQA+ people is more or less on par and anyhow rather small (bar US liberal colleges, but that's a different story) So of course there are roughly as many partnerless men as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 01:48 PM
1

Again That's enough of running in circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 12:00 PM
5

Have you heard about that MeeToo thing that totally "improved" the interactions, OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:53 AM
2

"but it was men starting wars". Basically, Hitler (likely) had a dick, you have a dick = you are guilty. Nuance: guilt propagation doesn't work like that with vaginas. A woman kills a baby? A woman beats own son/girl to death? Started wars? Staged rape? Others with vagina are not responsible at all.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 11:36 AM
1

Looks like another futile attempt to brush off the uncomfortable "both men and women feel awkward when woman works and men stays at home" fact. Also, "bread winner" in terms of "I make somewhat more than my husband" is pretty common for women (thanks for decades of bashing boys at school and shameless DEI quotas), however, "bread winner" in terms of "my husband looks after house/kids" is much much rarer and it is the latter I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:31 AM
0

Because being overweight is not a dealbreaker for me. But dating someone overweight who needs to date a skinny guy to feel attractive is not something I want. Going by stats and your preferences, you should stop accepting overweight women. Stop shaming men for vetting women Yeah, nothing wrong with that and a freaking shame it even is a thing. Men should quit that collective simp mentality induced by built-in pro-female bias in our species aggravated by nazi minded activist groups that hilarious…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:22 AM
1

Most of the time people say "overweight" (slightly over normal weight), but mean "obese". Obesity is unhealthy, promoting it a terrible idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:18 AM
1

Single example debunk general statements. That’s logic 1.1 That's not grasping the very basics of how statistics works. "Human males have one dick". "There are human males with two dicks, haha, debunked!" Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:15 AM
1

Jogging is something that act on your body Yet it would not act on Schwarzenegger's, in his peak years. With logic you've demonstrated above, it proves that jogging doesn't make a difference... No hot women is impress Impress is a harsh estimate. The OP is about "improve". Again, having more women is not having more sexual experience Yes, it is, by the very definition of sexual experience. nor having more women makes you more attractive Repeating the same moot sentence doesn't make it any strong…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:12 AM
1

Nothing hot about it. Side note: maybe that swiping app is not the best the way to find LTP. Just saying. I'd add: 1) Men libido = female libido multiplied by about 100. If men would have chances to be knocked out with another little individual (that resembles that woman they didn't even like that much) growing inside them for about 9 moths, they would be more picky too. 2) Men/boys simp too much these days in certain countries and it hurts, of course. 3) Hypergamy is an actual phenomena (as wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 10:49 AM
1

I posted in this sub only because it worries me that young men are seduced into what I think is a poisonous ideology that will damage them further I've discovered this sub via dataisbeautiful, when someone posted a couple of curious subreddit participation overlaps. Femcel sub, "Female Dating Strategy" had huge overlap with mental health subs. (the post now taken down, while, of course) Well, OK, that wasn't that curious (but what got posted in that sub raised my eyebrows) Then it was this sub a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 08:45 AM
0

It is amazing that even when given real example of insane anti-male judgement you find it appropriate to sing a song about "poor womxnz". I feel for all the women that happens to on the regular. No, it doesn't, don't be ridiculous. (and stop projecting lies about DV pretty please, check who Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first DV shelter had to run for her life from) How many people have had oral sex since then, without this happening? Oral sex example just shows how OUTRAGEOUSLY sexist the rul…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 08:03 AM
1

I would advise you to re-check what "linked to" means and, in particular, whether singled out examples (let's assume HC one is not made up) debunk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 07:48 AM
1

He is, just given his score in other categories, it doesn't make a difference. The whole argument is about whether having sex experience makes men more attractive - undoubtedly. Picking up insane outliers (in multiple areas) like HC, then picking up metric exacerbated by MeeToo cringe hysteria, is not debunking anything. It is like stating that jogging doesn't make people more fit, since it didn't make Arnold Schwarzenegger any more fit in his peak years.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 07:46 AM
14

Quality matters more than quantity. RP guys talk about "pre selection", but that doesn't just mean "this guy fucks a lot of women". If you have a reputation for fucking any woman you can, or hooking up with a lot of fat, or unattractive women, it's not a good look. True. Also, wisdom in soviet campus was that banging the better looking girl would open squad of not as good looking ones from the same circle, for what it's worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:43 PM
3

So the body count is only correlated not the cause of the attraction level. Life is not black and white and practically every time there is more than one effect at play. Who would have thought. Henry Cavil not willing to take chances in a country that already has at least two known cases of SERIAL false rape accusers is quite understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:41 PM
5

Yet, some men genuinely believe that women will choose an average Joe with a bodycount in the hundreds over a guy that's better looking/more charismatic/richer/actually talented that hasn't slept with loads of women? Hilariously out of touch. That's a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:39 PM
9

Henry Cavil ... has a body count of one HC's low body count (whatever the real figure is) has other reasons. He is quite concerned with false SA accusations and has stated so openly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:39 PM
3

It surely jumps when it goes from 0 to 1. There is also curious (and in ways hilarious) effect of women getting interested in men that other men show interest in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:37 PM
1

I think it is spelled "gender libido gap" and there is no way around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:14 PM
0

A real case: Woman used sperm from oral sex to get pregnant, gets child support Because f*ck men, as they are "privileged", that's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 01:07 PM
1

There are roughly the same # of heterosexual men and women. There can NOT be vastly more single women than men. And NO, "harems" don't really work. This explains why under 30, we have 2:1 ratio for single men to single women. Women under 30 find partners 2-3 years older than themself most attractive. Things reverse as people get older. (or, in case of men, die en mass)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:44 PM
5

Let me leave this here: Winning the lottery sends women rushing off to the divorce court. Men stay married If men have a big win, they are much more likely to get or stay married. A million kronor win (about £80,000) increases the chance of unmarried men getting hitched in the next five years by 30% and reduces the chance of married ones getting divorced by 40%. And, married or not, they have more kids. The impact on women is very different: a lottery win on that scale almost doubles their short…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:38 PM
1

What is the indicator that women get "over breakups" faster? I also want to see more nuance about "breakups". It is no wonder that divorce raped husband, who needs to leave own house, kids, live in some cheap shack out there to be able to pay wife/child support is taking "more time" to recover.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:32 PM
1

Parental investment gap in homo sapience branch of primates Males - minutes Females - 9+ months to years Women look for "he is so into me" partners. Finding a dick to ride cannot be an issue for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 08:25 AM
1

There is a lot of hypocrisy caused by how nuanced the interaction is. On the one hand, it's flattening to know someone is interested. On the other, it can get annoying and outright cringe fairly quickly. To add insult to injury: interested in me/not that much makes a monumental difference. Things are tricky (expert users only), in other words.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 12:15 PM
1

Mate, did you miss the lesson in school where they taught you that just asserting something isn't an argument? Ah. They've taught you that your assertions are right, but your opponent's are wrong. Amazing school. Starting really to notice those missed school classes of yours. That's at least the second time you've turned it personal. Please stop. [can't we blindly trust anything puked on SA?] No. I am not educating anyone - you were the one who made a positive claim ("Harvard women are more hype…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 11:44 AM
1

Anything more significant than that, in this day and age, is an anomaly, abusive, or not serious relationship. Based on what? Is there anything of substance, but femcel butthurt from "Female Dating Strategy"? Stats show that marriages with 10+ years of difference are more, not less stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 08:44 AM
1

How is 18 and 18 unusual? Girls pick "couple of years older than me" as the preferred age. or 1 or 2 years difference Exactly. I also love how you've referred to "older" as "difference". Masterful. 25 and 18 is anything but usual, if not downright predatory. 2 Men being older than women aligns well with wishes of both genders. That brushes femcels the bad way, but oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 08:42 AM
1

No, and I didn't say that. I think most people, men or women, are full of it. It is so apparently NOT the case. You are still a beta orbiter, just a beta orbiter with a different, equally stupid, strategy. Huh. Yes, my friend, it is Not, it isn't and your link is just an illustration of how terrible SA has fallen. There are 2 aspects here: 1) Established phenomena (women overwhelmingly care about partner's education/social status etc, unlike men) 2) Explanation of WHY that happens Now, #1 is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 08:41 AM
1

is most definitely a pseudo-science. As it makes Feminist theories look laughable. Of course. Although I'd say field that accepts a chapter from Hitler's "Mein Kampf" (men were the Jews) in a peer reviewed (!!!) Feminist journal is laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 08:26 AM
1

it is basic human rights that rich white men are denying the rest of us The last time I've checked, the war on boys that Christina Sommers was so kind to describe was not waged by "rich white men". Nor was it rich white men who spread BS about domestic violence and sent death threats (!!!) to Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first shelter for DV victims, for denying that violence is a single gender problem.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 08:21 AM
1

Men are as "sexless" as women. (bar the gay men, for whom daily bang-bang is rather norm, compare that to lesbian bed death and laugh at "buh heterosexual pairs also have less sex as time goes buy" "counter argument") So, if you need 50kg of something, but are getting 2kg, you are more likely to complain than a person who needs 1.5kg and gets 1kg.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 07:30 AM
2

apparently there is no thing as femcels.. Yeah, if we ignore the lonely folks from "Female Dating Strategy" and... other places. most attracted to 18 yr olds Men seem to find women aged 20-23 to be to attractive. 18 year old girl is highly unlikely to even consider dating 18 year old boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 07:23 AM
4

Incarceration gender gap is a thing indeed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity In the United States men are most adversely affected by sentencing disparity being twice as likely to be sentenced to jail after conviction than women and receiving on average 63% longer jail sentences
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:46 PM
2

If it is legal, yes, it looks acceptable. And if it doesn't look acceptable, it should not be legal. And rules should be gender symmetric.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:43 PM
12

We all know that a guy will leave his wife as soon as he gets a tiny bit of attention from a beautiful girl. That sounds very "Female Dating Strategy". Quite an inventive name for a sub, by the way. "Femceldom" would be shorter, but less deceitful. As for what "you" over there "know": almost no men would leave family for a tiny bit of good looking girl's attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:38 PM
1

This makes me wonder about sentencing practice if genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:33 PM
5

The "ticking biological clock" is causing stress indeed. But hiding head in sand never helps solve problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:31 PM
5

Just to add, they had to be over the age of 30 as well while for the men it was 21 To "compensate" for 1 million men (mostly) sent against their will and slaughtered in WW1, I was told.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:24 PM
3

In Sweden women actually got universal voting rights 2 years before men did. How?
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:23 PM
4

One of the big problems in the UK is that young women are brainwashed by US history, It wasn't much different in US either. Women got universal voting rights not long after men.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:23 PM
4

The 1918 act also gave women right to vote but the age limit for women was 30 compared to 21 for men. This was done to balance the number of men and women eligible for voting, since around a million men died in WW1. Wow. Could you share a source?
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:22 PM
0

Note that even offspring from noble families were sent to wars. And it is 2023 and humanity still fights wars. And although Frau Clinton tells us it is "women who suffer most" from wars, it's men who die horrible deaths en mass.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:21 PM
1

And you wonder why your relationships dont work out when you go for such shallow things These are things people are wired to do. It's as much of a choice as being homosexual is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:10 PM
23

Men are hypergamous aswell lol.. No, that is exactly what attracted research to it, largely, men don't care. This fact has been researched ad nauseum, it's amazing someone still makes comments like yours. I blame it on dubious feminist ideology being so ubiquitous.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:09 PM
1

The fact that you and I can mask well enough to pass more easily than others like us doesn't mean we represent every neuro divergent woman or man. Health services on planet earth are far from perfect, keep in mind that you being totally fine and some doctor misdiagnosing you is a very possible scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:07 PM
9

25 and 18 is pretty weird... No it isn't. In fact, 18 and 18 is very unusual. 18 years old women would be looking for men that are at least 21-22.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:05 PM
7

As one of the swipe here or there sites have found out, men aged 20-50 find women aged: 20-23 to be most attractive. That age also happens to overlap with top fertility . However, women aged 20-50 have preferences that are quite different: women of up to 45 find "my age +2-3 years" to be the best, up to "my age". 45-50 women might opt for men several years younger. So when we hear a guy who's 24+ is attracted to 18 year old's we just thing its so so wrong in so many ways. It is not wrong in any …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 01:04 PM
-10

16 is a grownup where I live.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:00 PM
3

Sure, the idea of “game” being necessary to create and/or maintain sexual attraction Hm. It basically says “manipulating women into sex by being nice doesn’t work, so now let’s manipulate women into sex by engaging in these behaviours xyz, which will give them the (fake) idea that I’m confident”. Curious. Isn't it easier to simply buy sex instead? But I see something else here to. There are things women want. There are things men want. Those things are different. And for you, by default, while o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 12:54 PM
1

No. In a theoretical, pick partner: 1) Mediocre millionaire offspring 2) Very talented, but poor guy many women pick #2. And it actually makes sense (better genes). Now, resources (being rich) is also important (to bring up the offspring), but there are limits to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:36 AM
1

Most of these guys are socially conservative themselves. That is US only phenomena, me thinks. As "liberal" folks do not dare to even consider some facts, let alone, ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:32 AM
4

The only male suffering worth validating is the suffering caused by men. Correction: CLAIMED to be caused by men is enough. E.g. "it is overwhelmingly men who kill themselves in despair", "poor victims of patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:30 AM
6

TRP from what I can see is full of poison I'm still struggling to figure what "TRP" even means when people use it here. Could you give an example of "poison". I'll also give you an example of what puzzles me greatly: hypergamy. A finding from evolutionary psychology, is somehow "ideology" of "the red pillers".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:29 AM
5

We have all these voices to speak out for minorities, trans people, women, etc. But who speaks out for the average, disenfranchised man? One can't sit on both chairs. Once you accept that young men are actually quite disadvantaged in numerous cases, you can't continue pushing for "women, etc".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:27 AM
1

Leftism is a political paradigm based on class structure, it has very little to say about sexual dynamics. The dominant ideology, the "critical theory" and co is very well "applied" to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:25 AM
3

It is there right? 1) Toxic masculinity 2) Any problem is caused by evil man conspiracy also known as patriarchy* 3) *some problems are caused by nazi-s** 4) Anyone we dislike can be called racist/misogynyst/nazi*** 5) ***We dislike everyone who doesn't virtue signal how great we are
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:23 AM
1

Femceldom Perfection.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:55 AM
0

Men complain more, as men have stronger libidos.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:52 AM
3

What I can say is that I promise you, as a woman, that we don't all have ulterior motives That's one naive take on things. The issue men/boys are facing is: 1) There is a built in pro-female bias in society 2) The bias is particularly strong among women 3) The faux "for IKWALITY" groups grew so strong most people don't dare to challenge them openly Concrete examples: 1) Lies about domestic violence 2) Lies about false rape accusations being very rare 3) Insane lies about girls being "oppressed" …
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:48 AM
1

If women choose happy, confident, successful men, then by definition they’re going to choose “winners” who are happy with the status quo of the world, and disregard/condemn the “have-nots” and the strugglers to struggle yet more. Does Musk count?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:33 AM
-1

vitriol for women Let me share my take: it is INSANE just how short sighted and projective this take is. Although, we do know from research that lack of preferential treatment (literally equal treatment) is perceived by women as "misogyny" , but it is still insane. Go to /r/MensRights. Read what is posted there. Try to estimate % of "hateful" threads. I dare you. Then go to /r/FemaleDatingStrategy. Try to find NON HATEFUL thread. Notice the difference. @Riden_ Cite a single "kill all women" like…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:32 AM
0

Yes it did. Men saying that women are inferior Where did you read that??? Today on twitter for example. OP is about "on PPD".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:28 AM
2

news stories of women who rejected men getting injured Yeah. You rarely hear about vice versa. Why could that be? but I was talking about stories of men getting rejected by women and retaliating. You mean, you were cherry picking issues? In a world where at least 80% of all murdered are men? Yeah, why could that be...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:27 AM
2

women have to worry about the “nice guys” physically harming No, not really. Nobody "has to" worry about rather rare events. harming or murdering them because In Canada, of 4 people killed by intimate partner, at least 1 is a man. On top of it, lovely detail such as "gender of the murderer" is skipped, but we know that intimate DV is lowest among gays, highest among lesbians. And then we have the rampant pro-female bias of this kind. But if killing is not enough, there is this lovely effect. I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:25 AM
1

ideologies Facts are not ideologies. Scientific findings are not ideologies. Nor are they negotiable. It is just the way things are. One can accept it. Or struggle with it. That doesn't change the facts. @ForsakenBadger8 all women want a man with $$$ Tell me you don't get what hypergamy is, without telling me you don't know what hypergamy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:20 AM
2

I think that a lot of people that follow these perspectives have been hurt or humiliated. OK, married, two kids, never had issue finding a partner, for nearly all of my life, from elementary school times, there was someone in love with me. Now, please tell me, how "hypergamy" a finding of evolutionary psychology is an "ideology"? This sounds like projection to me. Because what that "other side" is pushing does sound like one. E.g. the thought that some people (of the certain gender) struggle to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:19 AM
-7

What is referred to as TRP here is mostly referencing HARD and uncomfortable facts from actual research. (such as hypergamy, or "women are wonderful" effect) That scientific facts make you "mistrust" half of the world population (I don't get why anyone would "trust" entire world or sizable part of it based on genitalia anyhow, but could be me not grasping the nuances of the English language) because they are aware of well researched phenomena hints at something. @Jasontheperson RP men can come t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:14 AM
0

I hate women who are my age!!! Where did you read that? @AnyIntroduction3288 I've missed the word "hate" in your examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:11 AM
-5

This sub definitely makes me very wary of women. Some of the posts and responses are extremely concerning. The sense of entitlement some radiate is mind boggling. PS "For example" Your example isn't a post from here? It isn't. In reality, it's the entitled post I'm replying too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 08:10 AM
4

F*cking hell. His voice acting is why I was watching R&M in English.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 01:39 PM
13

He's screwed beyond repair already. One needs an "in your face" trial like that of Johnny Depp, and even then... Note how nobody gives a f*ck about Amber Heard literally admitting being DV perpetrator Last time I've checked, prosecutors/police MUST investigate DV cases as it's a crime, so it's up to the state to pursue it.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 01:31 PM
1

Honestly, of all the imaginable things, this one is not a problem. Would you rather see them embarrass themselves? PS Depends on how the enter the WC though. I recall a story on this sub about some entitled human garbage that thought they not only had right to use it, but also to forbid men from using it, while their highness is in there.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:15 PM
1

All we can do now is say "we told you so". You'll probably hear "but men earn more, so it's not a problem after all" if you say that. Nuance 1: it was married men who earned more. Nuance 2: for quite a while now, the group earning most in US is Asian Women.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:59 PM
5

One interesting case, how education works: boys are getting worse marks for the same work: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-31751672 What society sees (and cares about) is, that in formal tests, girls performs "worse" (as, guess what, there is no sexist teacher to lower boy's marks). What do we do? Try to make it more comfortable for girls, maybe it's better if all are given more time: https://www.businessinsider.com/oxford-university-gives-students-extra-time-to-finish-exams-2018-1 At the mom…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:39 PM
9

Women are aggressive towards provocatively dressed peers: study Also, you've dared challenge eternal female victimhood, one of the key mainstream dogmas.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 10:11 AM
7

Good to hear victim of fraudulent accusations got support, and not as usual: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/5ca7zr/terminated_company_says_i_cant_sue_ny/
/r/MensRights20/03/23 01:55 PM
12

I mean yeah sure. But it’s all fun and games When it's only men, who suffer.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 10:20 PM
59

No, as male in group bias is laughably weak and society is protective of women. However, driven by the injustice, it could grow strong.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 01:57 PM
4

Remind me about this story, once it goes through appeals court. Brad Pitt also got shared parenting first, but then...
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:40 AM
1

It is simply not about validity of that weird theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:39 PM
1

Those sentences make 0 sense. For starters, widespraed "misogyny", as in "hating people, because of their (female) gender" is BS. Then we have entire Huffington Post and co, editors of which can casually post things like "kill all men" (but of course, that's totally OK, surely you can find a male editor saying something like "kill all women" with no backlash whatsoever). And then we have word salads ingrained with right words. I have seen that approach somewhere... mm, ah, right. Here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:38 PM
0

studying the roles conditioning and exposure play. Yeah. Sprinkle baseless nonsense that contradicts facts at hand with random buzzwords. It helps. There are also effects of potential ostracism for going against the grain There are more women in STEM in Iran and, wait for it.. Saudi Arabia, than in Sweden. Stop grasping straws. a woman in tech and it’s fucking brutal Oh, which aspect of it? Is it you being brutal, or are men around you brutal to you, and if so, in what way? countries where women…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:34 PM
1

There is that notable tendency to brush off any cases of female privilege. Baseless claim that being treated as the more valuable individual is "demeaning" (i.e. it is demeaning to be royal, by this logic) allows to brush off many cases of female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:21 PM
1

Try again: "but women are at MUCH greater risk from being the victim than men are"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:18 PM
1

Sounds like you want the superficial to be true to boost your preconceived belief. Sounds like you have nothing to support your claims, but are projecting. Societal phenomena like suicide are complex. Ah. Unlike, say, other things, which are simple. When "only X% of are women, it shows that there is patriarchal oppression". (of course, if X is below 50%) It makes sense to me. men have greater access to weapons Ah. Thanks. Never suspected. are encouraged to know how to use them Oh. Are you tellin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:01 PM
1

because common knowledge is knowing that occurs on both sides Oh, is it? So what occurred on that other side? You know, let me be generous, I won't even ask about 80% of men, I will ask about 99% of men, you know, dudes that are not on the top of our social pyramid. but women are at MUCH greater risk from being the victim than men are That is why victims of 80% of murders are men, right? And it kinda sorta makes sense to you, right? "common knowledge<sup>tm\"</sup>
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:56 PM
1

common knowledge isn’t common Common knowledge is what you claim is "common knowledge" right? Can I also claim "common knowlege"? Can I only do it after attending hate sessions presented by grievance studies types? Please, enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:30 PM
1

Try googling Next time I'll argue with google, I will, weird silly stranger. common knowledge You mean, grievance studies "common knowledge" or something else? biased Yes. 5 times more than men. It would be honest to call it SEXIST, as that's what sex based bias is. Nobody is sure, why women are inherently so sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:12 PM
0

If you are upset about how many men kill themselves and are homeless, then fight it. I'm upset with the fact that government policies are shaped by sexist human garbage that clams to be for 'equality' and is just an example of gender tribalism. I'm in general upset that problems boys have are simply brushed off. Being protective of females is our trait ingrained in our genes and not an easy thing to overcome. I do not see what I can do about it, besides trying to spread awareness. (which I am do…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:07 PM
0

one story Woman who after heated argument drove over boyfriend TWICE and killed him, avoids jail Another one. 2 mins of searching. Let me know if you need more. But let me make it easier for you: try to find ONE BLOODY CASE like this with male perpetrator.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 10:01 AM
0

women just have it easy Yep. DESPERATELY need to wake df up. Hard to disagree. act like it’s not there is pure ignorance & intellectual dishonesty Try to, you walking myth repeater.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 09:03 AM
5

Document it.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 08:45 AM
0

[Let me make up insane strawman to show that despite all the evidence presented, it is somehow women who are disadvantaged] Oh, so very wise of you to bring it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:36 AM
1

Men are so disposable that baby boys across the planet, outnumber number of girls born, to make up for the upcoming boy deaths. Varies a bit between places, but overall, 103-107 boys per 100 girls. (this does NOT count in selective abortions)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:35 AM
0

The link to benevolent sexism being harmful as it perpetuates women being needed to be protected as a result amongst other issues In other words, amazingly successful PR stunt, that magically turns female privilege into "oppression" because it "perpetuates". Oh, also, studies show, that women perceive lack of the sad "oppression" to be a sign of misogyny. Convenient, ain't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:32 AM
6

bipolar are 15-20 times more likely to kill themselves, but I’m sure that’s Incompetence, right? They simply don't know how to do it. As nature made them so nice and non-violent, they are so not into killing, and so nice. (also, smell like roses) I mean, the example from above, swallowing aspirin pills and CALLING SOMEONE to tell about it, ain't that a serious attempt? Female refusal to admit men have it worse in such a glaring case, is damning.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:30 AM
4

Both genders attempt at the same rates. Men are simply less likely to fake it to get empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:25 AM
10

I don’t find suicide rates to be a convincing indicator of which gender has it easier. The way women want to twist "men kill themselves at a much higher rate" and ignoring the fact that it tends to be people who had it WORSE that kill themselves is impressive, but hardly novel. Chad has a high Suicide rate, and it’s much much higher for men than women (discrepancy is worse than the US). And yet, it has some of the worst women’s rights in the world. Measured by feminist groups. Creators of (among…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:23 AM
7

Lol, Jesus Christ, people... Monumental Incarceration Gap In the United States men are most adversely affected by sentencing disparity being twice as likely to be sentenced to jail after conviction than women and receiving on average 63% longer jail sentences. Getting worse marks for the same work Health spending on gender specific issues (prostate cancer is as common, but gets a fraction of what breast cancer gets) Decades of lies about women not being violent Bonus content Check why Alec Baldw…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 08:18 AM
2

About 30% of men/women (32% vs 28%) have no partner. Stop mistaking "let's bang bang" with "let's have LTR".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:25 PM
3

Sexual pleasure, sensation, erotic fantasies are caused by estrogen for both men and women. Hm, curious. How established a fact is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:09 PM
2

There is nothing wrong with pluralism. Also, it's not as one sided as you paint: e.g. women are more likely to claim "she is flirting" than men. At least in my personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:07 PM
1

You are saying trad gender roles don't suck? 😂 Lolwhat. No, I'm saying they are product of evolution, not male conspiracy imagined by some sexist pigs. And yes, women should simply dedicate their entire identity to men Whatever THE F*CK that means, victim of grievance studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:07 PM
2

Do men like women better than men.? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:06 PM
2

Why do you hate men so bad? Why do you sexually abuse your neighbor? Also, your reading comprehension skills are lacking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:04 PM
1

...you come up with studies about mating animals I've addressed that specific female butthurt in my previous post. It is fairly embarrassing what is happening to wikipedia, to be honest. men should be polyamorous by nature In the "bang" sense, men are. healthy sexual relationship As defined by females of our species. Cause why the hell not claim specifically female take on things to be the "right" one, entitled one. The funny part here is I'm not even talking about moral side of it, just that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:03 PM
1

Very picky, of course. Cons would be: other women would hate me a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 10:56 AM
2

Many of those 30-something men are dating 20-something women. Most of the age gaps could be 1-7 years, for example. Right BUT look at overall figures: of all men, 32% report being single, but only 28% of women. And that when there are slightly more women, than men (160 vs 166). So who are the remaining 4% of women mating with? My first thought was, hey, maybe it's homosexual people. But checking this out: 0.3% are transgender - won't have big effect on this napkin math, so ignoring it 4 (3.4%) m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 10:53 AM
5

Traditional gender roles suck for both genders. By which metric? The connotation of your comment is that there was some evil male conspiracy against world, that has established the way we function. It is infantile "always fault men" nonsense that is so obviously wrong. As species, we were adapting to the environment. Our females are very vulnerable and need a lot of care for many months, to leave offspring. This has a monumental impact on how relationships between sexes form. Had it been a by pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:13 AM
1

Well, yes, possibly, but what is your point? To claim which side has it harder? And then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:10 AM
1

That's absolutely not true. Just because men have a harder time getting laid doesn't mean they will jump on the first girl, specially if they are in a relationship. Indeed. The jump from "there are some men who would bang even <X>" to "<EVERY MEN> would do it" is insane...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:03 AM
1

If men are getting sex in their relationship there's absolutely no reason to seek it from other women. Instincts say "hi". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect And before thinking about "oh, it's about animals", take into account that many grievance studies students are working big time to spill their wicked ideology into poor wikipedia. So yeah. Certain pre-processing of text is required.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:01 AM
1

"like" which seems very different Ah, so, looking at hypothetical 2 persons, people don't "side with" the one they "like" more. Kinda sorta makes sense. Perhaps. Somewhere else, not where I live.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:58 AM
2

I sound happier and much more mentally stable Oh god, where did that projection come from, are you having mental issues? Or let me ask differently: are you from that "female dating strategy" female incels cesspit?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:57 AM
1

They're referring to people between the ages of 18 and 29. Both the 2019 and the 2022 US Pew surveys show this I'm still puzzled how that can technically work, unless we have polygamy, but let me bite the Pew data at its face value. So, 51% of men are single at age of 18-29, but getting older, 30-49 it is 27%. Women go from 32% to 19%. Half of women aged 50+ are single, but only 21% of men. So, well, if the data is true, it's just young women partnering with older men, I'd dare to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:45 AM
1

This like asking "can gay men start being heterosexual". And the answer is obvious. Having sex has very serious consequences like, cough, pregnancy to women. NATURALLY evolution shaped us so that women are more cautious in that regard. As opposed to men, who barely risk anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:49 PM
1

I'd call it "side with".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:43 PM
2

they are hot shit What does that mean. That they are attractive? Uh, so what. shoot way above what they can get in life Ah. You might be the guy I talked about if you happen to think that your attraction means anything, really. What on Earth are you even roaming about? We will start with just because men find 20-25 women most attractive doesn’t mean everyone will ever realistically snatch one Into butthurt healing we are? Oh well, why the heck not. Remind me, what happens to the women who are no…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:42 PM
0

Just because you personally would never spike someone’s drink There are people who ate other people, who were willing to be eaten. It's a bizarre weirdness that would not warrant opening "why do men eat other people" thread, for obvious reasons. they burned Jews and supported slavery Right. Conveniently, many suffragists supported slavery. So what you were saying about "men" who somehow need to defend themselves against astonishingly braindead and entitled "you are are like that" nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:34 PM
3

We don't easily sympathize with the "other" Female "we" 5 times more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:26 PM
15

Most women can cheat any time they want with relative ease most men couldn't cheat unless they paid a hooker. On the other hand, most men would be very tempted to bang another chick, it's much less so for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:24 PM
1

I’ve seen many studies that have claimed there are more single men than single women How, on planet Earth, could that work? Polygamy? Could you share one of the "many studies". Please let it be actual study and not a shitpost from this very subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 06:24 PM
25

You have probably heard that women in male dominated fields face discrimination. The same is true for men in female dominated fields. Bollocks. I've of course heard the bogus claims about any space where women are underrepresented is "due to oppression". But it's not true. Men don't side with men and don't form gender vs gender groups. Measurably. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:37 PM
1

How is mutually respecting each other's lives/personalities You've suddenly downplayed things to "mutual respect". Why could that be? Ah, right. what we do for the other a 'female power fantasy'? "He should care about me very very much" is a female power fantasy that is very frequently getting toxic. Forcing men to give up his links to his friends, family and often even hobbies, stems from that toxic femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:21 PM
1

Unfortunately Unfortunately people like you make this sh*t up to make bogus points. That brilliant move is also known as "strawman fallacy".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:18 PM
1

Oh, transition from "dating" to LTR. So skilled. You are amazing at switching subjects, OP. You should be teaching it. For money. Ew...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:16 PM
1

If I didn't care about their values and aspirations I assure you, hardly anyone doubted that. Stop projecting your "female power fantasy" about "care about me".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:09 PM
3

Kindergartens were invented 200 years ago, guess why... It was NOT working that was a privilege, not what gender tribalists cretins largely known as "feminists" tell you. Mot only women, 100 or so years ago KIDS had to work too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 11:20 AM
1

Men who think that a woman should be open to every man’s advances Do such men even exist? Is that even more frequent than 1 in 1000? Ew...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 10:45 AM
6

below average Seriously, do you even KNOW what on earth you are talking about? 85% of men can not be "below average", by the very definition of average. Learn what hypergamy is before enlighting people about it, jeez...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:46 AM
0

Tell me, please how we could have significantly more lonely men, than women. People mistake "can't bang" with something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:36 AM
3

value their dreams and aspirations It's insane how entitled you are, OP. Surely, you "value dreams and aspirations" of those you date.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:17 AM
16

It is the other way around: women have more reproductive rights (can opt out from parenthood even after birth), men can not. A boy who was raped by an adult women would still be responsible for paying for child support. And yeah, I know, there were "marches for equal rights" for decades, but something being outright stupid have never stopped certain activist groups. One just needs to be biased enough to overcome common sense.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:55 PM
3

I guess abusing women for generations Forcing them to stay home. Or wait, forcing them to work. (kindergartens were invented 200 years ago...) Also, not sending them to die at wars. I'm lost, frankly, but wholeheartedly agree.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:53 PM
2

Oh, please, men have much stronger libido than women. There are very obvious biological reasons for that, hint: consequences from sex (and don't bring in braindead shit like "but condoms and pils", stuff we didn't for 99.999999% of our history as species) This leads to women being into "relationships and committments" and men into simpler "let's bang". How many rounds do we need to make about it on this forum? Let us look at men who like men and women that like women, shall we? Gay men - many co…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 10:44 AM
2

Women and children are primary victims!* *since I could not give a flying F about men
/r/MensRights09/03/23 12:25 PM
1

A younger guy would gladly take an attractive older woman ("milf"). Age gap is suddenly irrelevant when the attraction is there. You are mistaking male imperative "would bang most healthy looking young enough to be fertile females" with something else. Men aged 20-50 MEASURABLY find women in their prime years, which is 20-23, MOST attractive. (it is wildly different from female picks, which go "my age +2-3 years) "Buh there are also couples with much larger age gap" - yep. And?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 12:28 PM
1

Lesbians also report more orgasms A nonsensical lie. It's hard for me to grasp how someone could take his even remotely seriously. better quality orgasm As if we had a scale to measure things, right? But there is a need to address damning reality, so let us use our imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 10:39 AM
2

IMO, men are more visually stimulated while women are more mentality stimulated... so that probably explains the disparity. Yeah, but there is big fat WHY to it. Think about consequences of sex for two genders. Not in super modern, condoms and pills times. No. In times we, as species, spent 99.99%. That hunter gatherer setting. Pregnancy, that lasts many months. Slow and vulnerable. "Let's have sex shall we?" "But you'll stay with me, if I get pregnant, right?" With that in mind, much lower, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 04:56 PM
1

I am sorry if my spot on comment caused you discomfort.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 02:19 PM
1

Actually Sweden (but yeah, it's an exception, not rule) tried to address male nurses problem. They've managed to boost it temporarily (I think with monetary incentive), but as the incentive was gone, so was surplus of men.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:07 PM
9

Cough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_bed_death contrast it with gay man for whom it is not unusual to have daily sex and ignore the outright embarassing "criticism" of "buh married couple also sex less". Yes, less. But much more than lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 01:05 PM
1

all women require attention, sex, and quality time together "Standards" drop significantly with particularly attractive males.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 01:01 PM
1

What usually happens is girls just bang the hottest guy they can while they look for a serious monogamous relationship, and while it may not be explicitly discussed she probably presumes hes casually doing the same with other girls. And even if she isn't, it's not his f*cking problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:59 PM
0

I'm gonna guess those women probably didn't know he was fucking them at the same time as multiple other women. Wouldn't fucking them at the same time make it (at least) threesome?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:57 PM
1

Also, his standards weren't exactly high but the girls were generally young, fit, and attractive enough. So his standards weren't high, but his girls were young fit and attractive. I'm missing the plot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:56 PM
1

63% of young men are single vs only 34% of women ROFLMAO. Fun fact: way before internet, in USSR, population census figures were showing that there are much more married women than married men. Somehow. (no, widows didn't count)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:54 PM
6

Half of that problem is "lifting women up" usually means "putting men down" more than it does anything else. Yep. E.g.: OMG, women uber drivers make 7% less!!! But it is automated, system doesn't know driver's gender. Women earn less because they drive slower and drive less. OMG, but it is still a problem, LET'S DO SOMETHING. To make it even more insulting, it is specifically MARRIED men who (used to) earn more. Now it's Asian women. (quota systems can work wonders)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:21 PM
2

There is no such movement, but there is very vocal BS labeling of people some men hating sexist f*cks dislike.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 04:11 PM
1

Show me what bill number it is. There is only so much BS I can tolerate. Go have solo kamasutra.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 11:33 AM
1

I don’t know what legislation he’s pushing for. That is very effing convenient of you. It is called "equal shared parenting" act and is notoriously brought down by the feminist groups. That very legislation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 02:59 PM
1

But maybe part of the issue is that he left a voicemail cursing his daughter out and calling her a pig? OH. That is why he is pushing EQUAL SHARED PARENTING legislation? And that is why Feminist groups are taking it down? Thanks for enlightening me, enlightened stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 02:31 PM
1

Only in the "he trusts me so much" sense. "He should radiate strength and confidence" wish doesn't drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 10:21 AM
1

Thanks for sharing your useless unsubstantiated opinion with the planet, stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 10:13 AM
1

Maybe a [random cherry picked stats to fit my narrative is more important]? No. So do you have emails of Alec Baldwin and Feminist Lobbying groups? You know, a f*cking millionaire WHO HAD SO MUCH OF IT he decided to start a movement? Could you yourself notify Feminist lobbyists to STOP BLOCKING equal shared parenting moves? Thank you so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 10:05 AM
-1

Let's try going 5 seconds without thinking about women for a change, how about that? Let me try to talk about "women find only 20% of men attractive" without thinking about women... Oh wait, I can't. Amazing request though. telling us our problems aren't real Talk about your own self, stranger. I'll even ignore your pathetic strawman. Amazing that you managed 6 upvotes for telling us our problems aren't rea Amazing is that a post with statement this braindead got upvoted. I guess it's the avatar…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:00 AM
1

Stay out of Canada "Men gotta pay", on planet Earth, we call it, #ikwality
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 02:37 PM
-9

So what? It's not something new and there are reasons for that. Also note that "dating apps" is an euphemism for "let's bang". If anything, 20% being attractive for random sex is surprisingly high. Think about consequences of sex for women. NOT TODAY, with condoms and contraception, but for, like, 99.99% of human history as species.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:29 PM
1

You get what you have voted for...
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:03 PM
14

Reactions to that post were quite good though. My only worry is that the dude might be accused of SA in retaliation. And since it would be a whole group doing that, he'd be toast.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:33 PM
4

Instincts didn't change, cough. Lack of "benevolent sexism" (special, elevated treatment for women, the word "sexism" is used to add a negative scent for this privilege) is perceived by women as "misogyny", studies show. (sorry, to lazy to dig right now)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:28 PM
1

the biggest share of custody is given to the parent who was taking care of the kid the most No. There is inherent, built in, female privilege in judiciary. It is insane as is, but gets worse when women participate in the role of a "mother". in the VAST majority of the cases Please, stop using stats as fallacy, it is very off putting. B. Pitt was screwed just recently, while Alec Baldwin much earlier. Guess what he did? Join the movement for EQUAL SHARED PARENTING. Guess who is lobbying for block…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:24 PM
1

moms I know Thank you, very much. Do you have emails of Alec Baldwin and Feminist Lobbying groups? To tell the former to STFU about the need for courts to default to equal shared parenting and the latter to stop hysterically blocking any judiciary move in that direction? Thank you in advance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:20 PM
4

Alec Baldwin fighting for shared parenting: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=571675029978341 Guess which movement blocks such legislations? A hint: its name starts with F.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:45 PM
1

at least a few times a week? That sounds quite like 50/50 to me. Good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:41 PM
0

Men are f*cked in family courts, but can I just brush it off by waving fraudulent stats and a couple of fallacies? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:40 PM
0

the last statistic I saw said that when men actually asked or wanted custody, they had it almost 50% of the times if the child was of school age I have seen that laughable "stats" too, it is being thrown every time not to admit that wonderful privilege people of one gender have.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:38 PM
5

Can I have your link for “women are twice as likely to win custody cases, even if they’re proven to be abusive towards their children” please? That women are ONLY twice as likely looks suspicious indeed. Even in proven abuse cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:37 PM
1

I like to see multiple responses. Women DO NOT WANT TO HAVE SEX even REMOTELY as often as men, how hard is it to get that established fact? Many gay pairs have sex... daily. Most lesbian pairs, go to once a month to NONE. Mkay? Sizable part of women is outright frigid. "Buh could it be lack of physical attracshah?" Yeah, in a way. Like a 55 y.o. man might get aroused only when particularly sexy woman shows up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:26 PM
0

You are making shit up. didn't have anything you're alleging women have done to men. That's a grievance studies projection that has nothing to do with my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 12:24 PM
1

Darn, OP, this has been addressed ad nauseum...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 09:55 PM
2

If a man has a successful and better earning wife, he should be proud of her and support her. Except it's not the man who's the problem here. It is WOMEN who are WAY more likely to divorce when getting promoted to CEO (CEO being an instance of success, the pattern is the same no matter what) Studies show both parties are unhappy, but women more so, when it's her, not him, in the main provider role. Because, guess why, our instincts, shaped in countless years of evolution, don't give a flying F a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 04:54 PM
1

That's a perfectly valid question. That question has zero relevance to this discussion. It is stupid attempt to switch the subject. You admitted yourself that you're the problem There is only so much stupidity I can tolerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 04:40 PM
0

We are talking about dating. I'm pretty sure that little vulnerable lady was pretty much dating that big monster whom she stabbed "in defense". at restaurants So, people get violent in restaurants. Go figure. Or wait, maybe chase date with a knife and even stab AND THEN just walk free, because you are of that "oppressed" gender? Yes sort of stuff already happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 04:36 PM
3

And on top of that women can get killed, abused Unlike men. Who can get killed and then the murdered is just let free, being of that "oppressed" gender. This dead guy's murderer not only walked free, but also claimed she was the victim. But oh well. He was privileged and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 03:15 PM
1

In the context, of "governments governments don't care about one of the genders" ad hominem would be "But what are YOU doing about it? Why don't YOU care about one of the genders". This is such a silly move, I feel a bit disgusted, to be honest. What I said was "your argument is wrong" Ah. That is what you said? Good to know. Could it be, you didn't support it with anything at all? It could? That's OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:50 PM
1

It's literally the most cited study <by some other people> Very, VERY relevant, thank you so much. Also, thank you for bringing up random observations of data that do not debunk statements made at all. Remind me, though how does this poor little white girl look like in the stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:44 PM
1

only if you pretend that emotional violence is the same as breaking someone's jaw No, it's only about purely physical. That women excel at mental violence is a different point. The vast majority of people who end up in the ED for DV Are you for real? You think it is appropriate to bring up THIS??? Jesus Christ... Yes, no Fs given about violence against men, no sh*t, Watson...
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:41 PM
0

Getting a LTR as a guy is harder than for women too, stop the delusion please. There are... some doubts about that. What you are referring to is that it's up to men to "demonstrate commitment" and stuff and it's, god forbid, up to women to attract and in some countries things might be quite different on what is enough of a commitment. I'd say, American men maybe should not have bent over backwards too much, as it just sets the baseline that is way off. it's not like the dating game is flipped wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:39 PM
1

It seems like the better option is to care about men It seems that going at hominem when running out of arguments is very typical of proponents of the hateful movement in question. There are many way to care about equality. Spreading awareness is one of them; the most appropriate one in reddit context.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:23 PM
2

Since dating is equivalent to "let's bang" and since "let's bang" for the 99.99% of human history, meant: For women: *knocked out for 9+ month, maybe years, with vulnerable little human(s) that resemble someone you once slept with, whom you possibly didn't even like much For men: *9 month or so later, maybe there will be your offspring isn't it freaking natural, that women are... more picky about bang-bang, while men are rather loose about it? Drop dating and make it about LTR and, uh oh, sudden…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 11:07 AM
3

for men to have higher emotional intelligence I've chuckled. Or, wait, were you serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 11:04 AM
3

There are instincts that did not change. So the need to find male partner that is: * Demonstrating commitment ("cares about me... so much", "takes me as I am"... there is no cap on this urge, up to demanding "simping") * Demonstrating ability to provide resources * Feeling attractive Then there is that insanely hateful and sexist "for equality" movement that thoroughly seasons all sort of nonsense, creating shockingly sticky myths about nearly anything, from "poor girls at school" to lies about …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 10:59 AM
1

early 20's too, i basically mean under 28/30 Women in that age pick "my age +2-3 years" as the most attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:59 PM
0

So you're the problem I am the reason "11% of killed journalists are women, STOP TARGETING WOMEN" gets posted by UN, no shit, Watson. In a way. As I am human and human race has that curious "Women are wonderful" phenomena. I understand your dilemma though. Realizing mainstream "truth" you were taking as gospel is actually shameless lies is not an easy take, only few can handle it. Much more typical it to go into denial mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:54 PM
1

among teens I CAN CHERRY PICK You are amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:52 PM
1

That's not an answer. Let me elaborate: society gives little Fs about men, and I am not exception. If a guy is getting punched for an hour straight, why are you not helping him? I have never witnessed that in person, else I would intervene. Sure, right after you answer literally any of the questions I asked. All questions were answered already. As for "what if I not argue in a good faith" - you can argue with yourself, or someone else. I could not care less either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:51 PM
1

i don't know any teenage or early 20s girl that likes someone with visible grey hair or wrinkles Unless those are "are exceptional in some way..." right? We are running in circles by now. It is very easy to find an example of exceptionally attractive men with signs of aging. There are 0 examples for women. As for that having nothing to do with fertility, oh well, maybe not, totally ruled out is it not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:47 PM
0

Why are you not helping the guy? For the same reason we hear in the news "67 people were killed, among them, 5 women". Men are traditionally treated like nameless shit not worth mentioning. A "brave lady" from Titanic, that somehow appeared in a boat only 45 minutes into crash? We have plays about her bravery, earthling. Okay, so start a campaign to encourage women to shield their men with their bodies in mass shootings Let me finish the campaign to encourage homosexual people to become heterose…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:40 PM
1

the same ''unless'' applies to women that look young or are exceptionally beautiful as well The older women, that are accepted as exceptionally beautiful, look YOUNG. Because YOUTH is associated with female beauty. Because "for some reason" men find women at peak fertility years, to be most attractive. Try to find one old exceptionally beautiful woman with gray hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:37 PM
0

You have a 1/366 chance of getting into a car accident for every 1000 miles you drive. does that prevent you from getting in a car? I live in Germany where the chances are way lower, my friend, but regardless, no, because I don't have a viable alternatives to it. I have to take that risk. Whereas, no thanks, nothing forces me to help out random female humans that will be in the gym when I get there this evening. I can live just fine without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:17 PM
1

if we are talking about majorities, majority of younger women aren't attracted to 40 year old men unless they look younger or are exceptional in some way... Right. Unless. boomer magazine made by older men represents what celebrities I've just searched for pictures of gray haired men. I doubt it is "by old men", rather, yet another "diverse" female-only editorial galore (a different discussion though). We know for a fact that men stick to 20-23 range in women "for some reason", while for women i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:15 PM
1

Regardless OK. There are men that find older women attractive too, what does that prove? There are men that don't find women attractive at all and are attracted to other men, what does that prove? That they exist. Majority of men is not attracted to old women and it is majorities we talk about. I'm 22 myself and older men look downright repulsive to me. Curious. So you find these guys not attractive? That's... well, unusual, but fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 01:35 PM
1

which reflects the lack of consensus about whether effects on offspring behavior are caused by age-related changes in paternal spermatogonial stem cells, or age-independent behavioral traits associated with a delay or extension of fatherhood Very convincing. As if women finding men even with distinct signs of aging quite attractive were doing things right. PS And for "orders of magnitude". It's "10-100-1000... times", stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:56 PM
1

Parental investment concept applies to males/females of species, not individuals, weird stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:50 PM
2

Leo is also a ho You can't be a ho, when parental investment gap is monumentally in your favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:38 PM
1

Link studies, not butthurt articles, Jesus Christ, reddit...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:38 PM
1

commit more serious domestic violence, That is a judiciary assessment to it. The same judiciary that isn't even investigating Amber Heard after she openly admitted acts of DV against JD. The same judiciary that just shrugged off a woman running her boyfriend over with a car, TWICE, after a heated argument. The same judiciary that just let this murderer go, just because she is she. middle and high frequency violence Cherry picking is a wonderful game to play with stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:33 PM
1

I'm sorry I can't view the study it seems Try this: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol33/iss3/3/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:29 PM
1

Madonna was dating young guys when she was even older than leo, does that mean she's ''HVW' No. does it mean that's what rich famous people in their circles do? Madonna is a Ho and finding a dick to ride is not a problem for women regardless of their income.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:26 PM
1

Peak sperm quality for men is not 35-40 Yes it is. multiple studies have been done to Heal the butthurt eh? Good that we have enough money to spend on that. twice as likely if you are 50 Amazing, that you need to pull off "are 50" when talking about 35-40 years old, isn't it? Things get ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE (do you know what that means?) worse for women who simply crossed 30 something. As if evolution would care about this, anyhow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:22 PM
1

i can't believe plenty of women find him appealing What about Sarkozi? Maybe Oland? Oh, what about J.Mayor? The delusional stuff posted on this sub is amazing. But yeah, that "chancellor" title didn't work for Merkel. And that Finnish PM would be as attractive without title. Why is that? A mystery...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:18 PM
1

vast majority of women would not Yes. And? Want to have a cookie, when one out of 10k is poisoned? Let's make it 1 out of million, wanna have one?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 12:12 PM
0

Here's a good litmus test: would you offer men help in the same situation? That is not litmus test at all and it is ironic that you are not even getting it. A woman can be punching a guy in public for an hour and no f*cks will be given. It's not the same the other way around. When Las Vegas shooting happened, there were many men covering their women with own bodies. It was never the other way around. There is privilege women have and someone just decided to get toxic about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 08:11 AM
1

Let me re-define what HVM (hilarious, that it's a term invented by female incels) means to better fit your dislike for Di Caprio.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 07:55 AM
6

Of all lame arguments, you have picked grammar, random twitter user? Against me? მართლა გინდა გრამატიკაში შემეჯიბრო? Подумай, не спeши, тoрoпиться не кудa. Eile mit Weile.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 03:02 PM
3

Di caprio is not a HVM Right. That is why he can casually get good looking young women at his age. That is the very definition of "not HVM". A men who can easily date young, very good looking, women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 02:59 PM
3

Its a really easy script too… “Excuse me, do you need any help?” The issue at hand is some ladies misusing it to claim being harassed, which renders it "not worth it" for men to even bother, harming women overall. The cure would be to backlash against individuals misusing it... but society is lacking on that front, naturally siding with women no matter how evidently terrible they are. Not to go too far for examples, take Amber "I was hitting you, I wasn't punching you... why are you running and …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 02:34 PM
12

the Chad complex Is it how you refer to "a guy who has lots of choices, but does not do what I want and instead does what HE wants"? I liked him not for his looks but for his dedication to a cause I was very into Right. His personality too, I bet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 01:53 PM
2

Fine, men will overwhelmingly fuck any woman No, that's not true. the barrier for men to fuck a woman if they are horny is almost non existent If they look healthy enough, and some other ifs from that field, but compared to female barrier of DOES HE CARE ABOUT ME yep, non existent. In fact, men do not even have that "does she care about me" barrier at all. I realize reality is very skewed in places with shockingly low rates of sex, like US. Shed literally have to have disease and 500 pounds to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 01:34 PM
1

Most crime is committed by men against men. Men are much more likely to be psychopaths/ narcissist than women are, statistically speaking, Men are also more likely to be geniuses, than women. But oh well. Men are 10 times more likely to be the victims of violent crime. Thanks for hinting at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:16 PM
3

False rape allegations. False allegations of rape made to the police are statically rare Bovine feces Somewhere in the range of 10-40%, we don't know where. But we also know who lied about it being 2%. The lie is quite old and so is research into it. The Truth behind Legal Dominance Feminism's Two Percent False Rape Claim Figure And we also know that known viral "statistic" on false rapes is [rated with 3 out of 5 Pinnochio on Washington Post AND we also know that authors refused to fix it](The …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:15 PM
0

For every ''Slut'' there has to be a man that fucks her. Slut shaming is a female vs female tactic, leave men alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:13 PM
2

The welfare sate is paying for these fathers children and his ''bad choices'' just as much as it is paying for the mothers children. It is her choices, not his. She can decide she is not ready to become a mother. He cannot decide it, even if he is an underage boy raped by a 38 years old woman. Oh, and you want to hear the wonderful bit? Yes, he must pay her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:12 PM
0

Domestic Violence . Even if we accept the most charitable studies which put the genders of perpetrators at roughly 50/50, the severity of violence men commit is almost always greater. Bovine Feces rooted in 5 decades of lies Check this out, after reading this post. Pay attention who it is about and who sent her death threats. For starters, 70% of non-reciprocal (one sided) intimate partner violence is perpetrated by women. Then, DV rates are highest among lesbian couples. In-between for heterose…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:10 PM
2

What if we simply tell those b*tching about two adults dating, to get on with it? If this is so wrong why don’t we just change the legal age to 25 for everything. Because it isn't wrong at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:44 AM
1

Women do like beauty too "Male beauty" is not as firmly associated with age. There are examples of men looking quite old (e.g. Clooney) with grey hair and what not, while being also considered super hot. Try to find an example of a hot woman with gray hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:42 AM
3

"High Value Male". It's pretty commonly used in this sub too A copypasta from the female incel sub ("female dating strategy"). Users of the said sub are quite active here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:41 AM
4

A true "HVM" prefers a woman around his own age lol. Laughable nonsense. HVMs prefer women around age they (and majority of men) find the most attractive. Whiich happens to be around 20-23. Seen that Di Caprio b*tching?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:40 AM
4

They want to fuck, men will fuck anything and say anything to get that fuck, you're not anything unique As long as you read it "in a group of men, large enough, there will be a man, who would fuck this ugly human" - yes. If you mean "every men would f*ck any woman" you are very mistaken. Last, but not least, it is not about who would fuck whom to begin with. It is about who is rated as most attractive. It just so happens that men rate women aged 20-23 to be most attractive. It miraculously also …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:39 AM
2

The quality of sperm lowers with age too 1) Male fertility is way above needed threshold for most men anyhow 2) Peak fertility for most men is at 35-40 3) Female buthurt projects around this are frustrating
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:36 AM
1

I saw a OKC survey that says that women who were 22 were already considered l'ESS attractive than at 20 which is insane You got it insanely wrong. Women of 20-23 were dubbed most attractive by men of ALL ages considered (which was 20-50 I think). For women the figure was very different depending on their age. Oldest women opted for "-5 years", yougest for +2-3 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 11:34 AM
10

I feel uncomfortable that I need to spend quite a bit of my attention not to face in the "wrong" direction. As for ticktok monkeys, I haven't met them in a gym yet.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:33 AM
1

The real force at play is: female butthurt about prime years for man being at around 30-40, when for women it peaks at 20-23. And, yes, in ways it is unfair and all, but shaming around "why are you attracted to adult people you find most attractive" is as wise as asking homosexual man why he is attracted to men.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:13 AM
3

Sorry I don't have links, but I have vivid memory of the events and I haven't seen it covered anywhere. Quite a few years ago, when Trudeau government came to power, his "feminist cabinet" came with a fantastic idea of making Canadian foreign aid exclusively for women only. Rationale, by the said folks, was that "studies show" that "by helping only women" one helps "everyone". (I'm not making this up). At stake were about 300 million Canadian dollars. Next, Trudeau went with this "F*ck African B…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:27 PM
2

I'd expect someone posting in this sub to be literate enough to know a bit more about domestic violence. But even if not, I'd expect someone posting here, to be reasonable enough to realize that men having dates with multiple women at a time has nothing to do with intimate partner violence, which, let me break it out to you, is highest among lesbians, lowest among gays and in the middle for heterosexual couples. And for heterosexual couples, 70% cases of non-reciprocal (only one side is violent)…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:56 PM
3

These Facebook groups may have a purpose in stopping violence against women I can't believe what I'm reading...
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:01 PM
2

This doesn't show this cause. Which might well be that the very reason number of women was raising at that particular job was that there was anti-male stance.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:34 PM
1

Most of the women here say Weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/23 02:31 PM
1

A man isn’t responsible. But a woman is likely going to choose a different partner in the future if the one whom she is currently with doesn’t make her orgasm. I doubt it. The role of female orgasm is overrated, seems like a curious twist to make adultery more effective. Sizable share of women is frigid. Not to be confused with "men does not care about me", which is devastating to relationships (from female perspective).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 03:14 PM
2

What happens if you ask about a story about a man? In the example above, the race was the issue.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:55 AM
1

Useless blabla. Both "settling with" and who to f*ck with is driven by instinct, and what some old (dead?) piece of human garbage said in her hateful fantasies plays no role.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 09:55 PM
0

If young women are the only ones with value With that BONUS value. not only do they want sex, but also my time, money and free maid services That is fairly unusual for planet Earth, good job on your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 12:15 PM
1

Men aged 20-50 find women aged 20-23 the most attractive. I doubt one can easily "meet" that. On the other hand, the whole "shaming" of what someone likes is absolutely nonsensical, as it cannot be changed and just hiding one's opinion doesn't seem to help anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 10:40 PM
13

Time looked into it. If you take that definition of rape, number of men raped by women equals number of women raped by men. Also, calling "raped or sexually assaulted (which includes hearing a lewd joke that had been told to someone else)" all "raped" is misleading by design. Time: The CDC's Rape Numbers Are Misleading And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually …
/r/MensRights18/01/23 03:56 PM
2

Stay alone forever? Yep. Stats show that single, never married % went from 20% to 30% and raising.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 03:52 PM
1

It was "at dinner" I read. if you say it in every sentence. That is adding details that weren't in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:07 PM
1

What the fuck? Did you not go to college? University. I was 16 back then. Is it a US thing, perhaps?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:06 PM
1

Usage of lewd words? Does it change the fact that that's all about impressions about someone's outlook?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:05 PM
1

So, saying someone is "unbelievably hot" is... "objectification"? Is it only when someone is a woman or regardless of the gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 10:34 PM
0

Well the examples you just gave are exactly why i have no interest in being around men. I have been around men all my life. Not a single time I have seen grown ups joke about dicks. "Saying something crude" is too subjective to assess. "Saying something objectifying" I'm lost on whatever is even meaning of it. Objectifying whom and how?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 09:49 PM
2

Women can be sure about being the parent of the offspring, men cannot. This is just one of the unresolvable reasons for promiscuity of the genders to be treated differently. The "should be" doesn't fly when it is about our feelings. • Promiscuous men are causing women to be promiscuous Mind blown by just how many ways men "do bad things" to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:24 PM
1

Nowadays some men will call a good husband a simp because he does his share of chores. Who would call a fair split of duties simping? Are you sure it's not the case of "husband works longer hours than his wife... then is supposed to do lion's share of home chores"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:17 PM
1

What was the original meaning of the word "simp"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:18 PM
1

Because it is female on female slur, used against particularly attractive women, hated by majority of, wait for it, women. (and since anything done by overwhelmingly women is fine on this planet, so is this slur) And the funny part is that there is an actual study to support my claim. Even more interesting is the MAGNITUDE of the hate. Women are aggressive towards provocatively dressed peers: study
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:17 PM
1

I've watched "Shazam" a couple of months ago. And it struck me how "insurgents" which were happening essentially in Afghanistan and were, pardon me being direct, Taliban (who the heck else) were... glorified. Isn't it ironic that people who pushed for "stopping ever war" also happen to be the ones most concerned about the consequences? Afghan women started dating in badoo, tinder, etc. Lolwhat... Seriously, what on Earth are you talking about...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:08 PM
25

The funny read was Owen Somebody from The Guardian demanding 50/50 split on nominations... Damn, you almost cannot make this shit up...
/r/MensRights16/01/23 12:56 PM
2

You don't get basic, obvious mechanics of evolution, despite being hinted at it several times.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 09:39 PM
–

incels who think they’re OP has presented whopping 2 examples. Both were by the same user.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 07:27 PM
–

If this were true the “Why is it ok for a man to do something and not a woman” trope would not exist. If parental investment of our species had 50/50 split, neither would there be a monumental sex drive gap, nor the promiscuity would be interpreted differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 07:26 PM
–

What a weird way to say "rape is not OK". Penetration or not, people have right to have no to intercourse of whatever kind. Oh, that applies to both genders. Curiously, per CDC victimization study, there is a shocking number of men who are coerced to have heterosexual sex. ("forced to penetrate") https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 07:23 PM
2

Huffpost editor is known for posting "kill all men". Yes really. No it's not something new. No, of course she wasn't fired.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 01:18 PM
1

JD should not have accepted shrinking it to just 1 million.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 09:35 AM
1

TRP advocates getting your money up to increase your chances Why did you switch from "people walking down the street" with "someone who dates you"? Does every man need to achieve Bill Gates level wealth Stats don't tell exact figure, although they say poor men are more likely to be single. How many billionaires do we have among involuntarily celibate men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 04:23 PM
2

OK, just to stir up some discussion, "ideal partner's age" case study Women of age up to 40-45-ish: "my age + 3-5 years" Women of age 45-50: "my age MINUS 3-5 years" Men of ALL AGES: 20-23 See the catch here? Keyword: peak fertility. For men it's quote often at mid 30s and even later and matters SO MUCH LESS. ​ Remember b'tching about Di Caprio's partners? Dude simply mates with whom he likes most. ​ Now, is that fair (at least in isolation)? It clearly isn't, women are disadvantaged by mother n…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 03:14 PM
4

That’s stupid. He also saw something feminist. Does that mean feminism is a terrorist community. Conveniently, there are double standards.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:10 PM
7

Testosterone tablets make people... more generous at sharing. Seriously. (and curiously) Perhaps hunters returning to the tribe often had to share stuff they've killed with everyone in the tribe. This spans into how bosses behave. Male bosses are more generous at sharing, but I be damned if google lets me find that study...
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:56 PM
7

That's the power of "Privilege" myth. It can be utilized in reality to bash people.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:54 AM
1

I see good reason for different take on promiscuity. There are good reasons for women to be picky about sexual partners. (as it's the female side gatekeeping the sex) A woman can never be accidentally raising someone else's child, just because her husband banged someone else.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:22 AM
1

Here’s how you can tell: Are men owed sex? Whatever the answer is to that question, just use that. What I don't get is that people act as if there is an authority out there somewhere that one needs permission from. The last time I've checked, people could decide for themselves.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:19 AM
2

Let me make it even harder to understand (because why not :)): "Чем меньше женщину мы любим тем больше нравимся мы ей" (I'm sorry you have to use a translator) does not contradict "Women like that someone is into them. Even if they don't like that person, it makes them feel better." It is about liking the fact someone is attracted to you, not the person directly. And, there is a curious effect that when simping stops, often resulting in major jealousy that they cannot even explain to themselves.…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 08:00 AM
1

I'd separate two, very different "it helped"-s. 1) Someone figured that in Germany, 90% of CEOs are offspring of influential people. (Spiegel article in German) 2) When there is no such established position to be taken, and someone, yes, using existing links, creates something new, is quite different. I agree with you that they had quite a jump start. I disagree you with stripping them off any achievements: there are many thousands of people with links like or better than theirs. I don't recall …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:55 AM
3

I've read a story on reddit, about a WOMAN nurse who was sexually assaulted by a female surgeon. It ended up with the nurse having to leave the state (!!!) to find job. Also, check this out (only vaguely related, shows the "activities" HR is enrolled in): https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/5ca7zr/terminated_company_says_i_cant_sue_ny/ The guy who did nothing wrong, survived only because there was, essentially, an angel who stood up for him and didn't delete the evidence. Close to 0 re…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:49 AM
2

In my experience hot women tend to like it when guys aren’t actively into them. That effects is at play, but note how it's not mutually exclusive: 1) Enjoying someone is simping for you 2) Spending more time on those who don't do that yet Anecdotal, but I know 2 very popular women who ended marrying guys they didn't even consider marriage material. Guess what impressed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 07:36 AM
2

That said, do women appreciate personality more than guys might realize? Probably, yeah. I've realized that women care a lot about how you make them feel... I think you are mistaking "this guys shows signs that he cares about me" with something else. Commitment is quite different from personality. Women like that someone is into them. Even if they don't like that person, it makes them feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 03:21 PM
96

When they ask why tell them you aren't going to be "unfairly harassed due to gender" The issue is, the 70% female HR with heavy pro-female bias (men lack it altogether) are highly unlikely to let it fly.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:11 PM
1

Do you think anybody would have watched them if they didn't have a famous father or one of them being involved in a huge scandal? Huge scandal was their creation in my opinion. (that p0rn is still online isn't it?) As for famous father: there are scores of famous lawyers, tell me about any other family that made billions.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:49 PM
1

Ironically, the only reason men are taking this advice is in order to get women. All advice given by redpill communities is under the veneer of getting more women. That's all it boils down to. The nice side effect is improving self in the process. If redpill communities really felt that men should find purpose outside women It's hard for living organisms to (en mass) find purpose that doesn't include having offsprings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 02:18 PM
2

Kardashians are famous for practically no reason. Sex sells. It's not like someone donated shit to them, you know. They've created super popular reality show and figured how to monetize on it. It is American Dream come true, as far as I see it.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:06 PM
1

So his net worth is at "mere $400 million", chuckle...
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:05 PM
3

So many men here say they’d have sex of any kind if a woman was interested Mm. Hold on for a sec, I am among those who says, literally: "Any, not too unhealthy looking woman can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual sex partner". That doesn't mean that majority of men would bang very bad looking woman, but some surely would.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:39 PM
24

All women, simply by virtue of being a woman, have an intrinsic value that men do not. That isn't entirely true. Only women of certain age have that intrinsic value.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:08 AM
2

there would be... strip clubs with men dancing I have news for you... a women could go down to a sperm bank Not in Germany But what do men inherently offer? The desire for having a reliable LT partner is deep in our genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:07 AM
2

That's one weird OP. Doesn't even sound like real story. On top of it is fairly pointless.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 08:21 AM
2

Maybe women should take that as a compliment then. They would, if getting such compliment took an effort. As it stands, it literally means "you are not super ugly". That's not much of a compliment, is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 08:17 AM
7

Most men (according to this sub) would have sex with any woman That's BS, but your point stands: many men would have sex with almost any woman, so it's not that much of a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 08:15 AM
3

Just to be clear what is going on here: the standards of sexual offense applied are quite high. I'd wager the goal here is to increase the final figure. Side effect is, that if the same concept is applied to male population, you get an even slightly bigger figure. But the AMAZING part of the story is on the reporting side of things. They still manage to tell only female part of the story.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, relatives... it is particularly bad in some countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:19 PM
6

Woman can rape a boy and still claim child support. There was also curious case of a pregnancy after blowjob. Defendant won the appeal, but in the original ruling, judge claimed he should have "counted with" that sex can result in pregnancy. Even blowjob. Even in condom. Somehow.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:30 PM
1

Bottom of our social pyramid was overwhelmingly male from the day 1 of feminism.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 09:37 AM
1

75% of Norwegian men parent children. Now, this is down from 85% or so earlier, but still way more sizable than "chads". On female side of things, 84% have offspring, down from 88% or so. So: 1) Yes, there is men to women disparity 2) It is not even remotely as drastic as people swiping left/right imagine 3) Stop projecting "let's bang" app population, majority of women aren't even on the platform, these platforms are RIDICULOUSLY more popular among men, than women. (maybe because it's men who a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:47 AM
1

This assumes we can change the crux of what people WANT by imposing societal norms. But we can't. We can change what people DO. That's essentially what moral norms are about. They, however, do not change what people WANT.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:19 AM
1

It's like when someone asks you if you have a partner and they go "oh, why not?" That's a weird thing to ask to begin with, does it really happen that often?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:08 AM
13

I don't get what is the issue here. It's up to whomever to decide with whom to f*ck or LTR or whatever. Also, people should stop projecting "swipe left/right" woes, as on the said platforms women are outnumbered by men 3-5 to 1, quite opposite to real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 03:39 PM
0

Less sex = more angry people. So, cough. What is and isn't selfish is relative/subjective. In general women would want less frequent sex, men would want more. So, of course "the right way" is how women want it. On planet Earth we call it #ikwality
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 03:04 PM
1

How does the "societal pressure" look like? Isn't it just parents being worried that their offspring are to passive at having own offspring?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:59 PM
1

I'm and I'm going It doesn't matter. Women take far and away better care of themselves than men That fairy view of your own gender group is amusing. What is going on with hygiene in US is vomit inducing. The basic standards for women is a way higher Most women in their primes, 20-23, have everything out of the box, if they are not overeating. A man would need to regularly exercise to look fit. Also... Genders seem to react to body odor differently. Past research has highlighted the importance of…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:45 PM
2

Also, many guys want to be the head of a family. As in "want to leave offspring". Something pretty much any organism on this planet has drive for.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:36 PM
6

You have asked why men bother even with women meh looking. You go the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 01:15 PM
2

there is no contest as to who puts in effort Of course not. Not least because it barely helps men. Women, especially American, tend to overestimate their own standards of hygiene, cough. who looks overall better Women tend to misread "horny men would f*ck even those who they don't find that good looking". Pretty much any, not TOO UNHEALTHY looking woman can walk into a bar and get out with a willing heterosexual partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:38 PM
6

Was it sarcasm? I hope it was sarcasm, chuckle. Else it would be written textcomprehension issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:34 PM
10

If we're such $2 bags of chips, why do men bother? Because evolution made men very horny, so much that even ugly women have no issue finding a willing dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:17 PM
5

And that's a good thing, right? For the sex negative branch, I guess. Makes one wonder if it has something to do with looks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_sex_wars
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:13 PM
5

N-Counts stay lower. Couples are having less sex. It has exactly 0 impact on counts. It makes men try harder. That's the theory and instinct behind the gatekeeping. Everyone has more time for hobbies. Ah. That's what those angry wimxn of FDS are doing. Hobbying, chuckle. So, back to reality: A) Happiness is steadily down from 70s B) Unhappiness is steadily up from mid 80s C) BUT (bonus): gender happiness gap is smaller now. Women got to men levels of unhappy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:12 PM
2

Some women look good, even great with "little extra" There is a disagreement on how little that "little" is, but yes, exactly. And? And no morbidly obese looks good, unless people have that specific kink.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 11:27 AM
14

If you wonder why: they did that study in Australia and discoverd that figure was about 25% for both sexes Obviously, having men as victims, let alone, as as frequent victims, is "problematic" to the mainstream narrative.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:33 AM
3

So hot girls get into LTR with avg men? The monumental sexual appetite gap between sexes makes it so that (measurably, this is actually OK cupid stats): 85% of women are rated as attractive or very attractive 80%+ of men are rated as below average, good half of that 80%, as having "dumb face" Let it sink in. Does it make sense? Nah, not really. People are mistaking low "would bang" male threshold with something else. (most lesbians bang once a month and less, many gays bang every day) From what …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:34 AM
1

And there is no reason for women to sexually not behave more like men. There might not be a rational reason, but our feelings/instincts do not instantly change just because we have invented a piece of rubber.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:28 AM
1

Being selective isn’t always elitist, it’s also a symptom of confidence. That's a lovely talk, until one remembers how strong our basic instincts are and how against them all that wonderful talk is. While it is imaginable that some men could leave offspring in purely bang-bang mode, it was absolutely not an option for females of our species for 99.9% of our history as species. And while things have changed very recently (pills were invented when, 50 years ago? Infant mortality was what, 50% only…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:24 AM
1

I don't understand how "not accepting" somebody is single looks like. How does "receiving bad glances" look like? How could someone glance at someone and figure if she/he/xim is single??? People pay less attention to men and to unattractive people, so what.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:21 AM
16

Lol no. 50% of young women are overweight There is a monumental gap between overweight and morbidly obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:02 AM
11

America is one of the least fatphobic countries on Earth by comparison. Europe (northern or not) is not even remotely as obese as US.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:01 AM
8

The dating market is terrible for most men. The specifically LET'S BANG market is. LTR dating market is identical or even worse for women (who are more into that type of relationships... I am chuckling when referring to "let's bang-bang" as "relationship")
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:00 AM
1

Rape stats is a lie. CDC sexual victimization study of 2011, revealed 1.27 million men and 1.26 million (yes, more men than women) women were forced to have sex against their will. Here is the relevant study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:47 PM
5

Majority of them likely posts in femaledatingstrategy too. A cesspot of... well, let's call it cat lovers.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 06:14 PM
1

to want to use someone That's one hell of a take on human sexuality. is it not shallow No, it's the way sexuality works for the gender which puts laughably small parental investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:38 PM
1

Luckily, now there is an emjoi to dick-shame men. Vice is celebrating it. Remember: vice is for equality. I know it doesn't quite look like that, hence the reminder.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 03:14 PM
1

shes describing the majority of men No, she's sharing a bunch of anecdotes. I don't know any men looking for relationships. That being said, men wanting what men want and not what women want is... pretty natural and not "shallow".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:11 PM
1

I am the entitled (with certain genitalia) so you gotta ENTERTAIN ME, oppressor! But I get that OP was meant seriously. But, remember, "there is more to relationship than sex" (when you figure male libido = female libido * 50, so when two lesbians bang, it gets down to once a month and below, when many gays band every day) Kek.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:10 PM
1

Because it's men who have to convince with demonstrating commitment. Because it's women, who for 99% of our history relied on men being the providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 01:30 PM
0

In this amazing piece: The Truth behind Legal Dominance Feminism's Two Percent False Rape Claim Figure (this is a 2 decades old serious paper in which a lawyer tried to figure out where did the insane claim about only 2% of rape accusations being false came from, it's quite a read and mentions interesting push: to make rape a strict liability offense. It was denied that it was the intention back then, but hey, look at Sweden and yep, it's a strict liability offense over there) it was mentioned t…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:21 PM
1

"Real science" is fairly elusive a term these days. Her diagnosis includes word "idiosyncratic", essentially "peculiar", basically standard medicine has no idea how the heck to explain that, literally. He's 60 and looks like 60 to me, but it was a while I saw him in an interview. His wife got cancer and he developed drug dependency and had to recover from that, on top of that weird meat diet. So no wonder if he doesn't look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 01:02 PM
1

Female "pick me" is "attractive women I hate". So, these humans ARE more attractive. Spineless white knights are not more attractive, but can sneak to "friend zone" with some hopes for "maybe in the future". Simping is just signalling commitment (standard ceremony in our species) in a spineless way. As for "damage" for the mystical "dating scene", I don't get why people think there is anything one can change in either direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 03:39 PM
1

Let me try David Hilbert then.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:04 PM
2

he always seems to "win" debates because he's so suspiciously vague Now, this is disingenuous. The "are you saying that" is a clear, hands down hilarious use of basic logic. But if they send me his political viewpoints How does one send "political viewpoints"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:30 PM
4

A lot of people think he’s a charlatan who doesn’t have anything of worth to say. Those people should check out his debates with Zizek. And for a contrast, watch Rosanne Gay's debates with C.S. And then explain to me, why do feminist "debates" look so embarrassing. When was the last time feminists actually debated something for real? Did it ever happen? And note I mean debated, not 'disagreed on'. Of that I've seen plenty: Feminist sex wars but that wasn't debate, rather, girly bullying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:28 PM
2

You don't go on an all meat diet? People imply he somehow promoted it as something for everyone to do, which he didn't. Both he and his daughter has weird health issues that seem to be addressed when switching to that, to put it softly, unusual diet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:26 PM
1

Is there anyone that doesn't fit this description? Had Einstein ever said something you'd disagree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:25 PM
3

I like some things JP has said. I disagree with other things he has said. You've just rekindled my hope that humanity will survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:24 PM
2

Learn to attack ideas, not personas. Banning JP's "12 rules" book, something absolutely TOTALLY NOT CONTROVERSIAL from bookstore selling TWO EDITIONS of Mein Kampf is.. I'd say crazy, but there is some [bonding between Feminists and Hitler and his "Mein Kampf"] it seems. Anyhow, dude is a millionaire, has millions of followers on twitter and I doubt he'd cry about being "trolled" by some indoctrinated rando out there somewhere. That being said, he's dropped the ball first on climate then (much w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:23 PM
5

Believing every word a woman tells you is fairly naive. Being focused on a concrete number of former partners is... weird. Women with higher number of partners are more likely to commit adultery is a a statistical fact. Now, it being statistical also means that YMMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:04 AM
6

They never were really different, today you might simply be seeing more aggressive version of the same shit. It was lies, half lies and fantasies from day one. E.g. Frau Wolf has theorized back in XIX century, that there was no female Shakespeare because women were banned from writing poems (because something-something patriarchy of course) Except they weren't. Janice Fiamengo has major content on the subject, I'd urge every single user in this sub to check her amazing work: https://www.youtube.…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:24 PM
2

People who are very sexually experienced do not focus on looks for this reason. Oh, wow. Now we have "pro" swipers. Stop assuming someone Also stop assuming having a vagina makes you not boring in sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 03:53 PM
0

What would happen and how would it happen? Hypergamy would be acknowledged and shameless b*tching about women being "oppressed" would stop. Everything else is just consequences/decoration.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 02:25 PM
1

No, as it is a choice one makes.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 11:53 PM
1

I would not mind idiots doing something with own life to spite others.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:58 PM
5

Women mistake their "would bang" with male "would bang". If men's "bang" had the risk of being knocked out for 9+ month and end up with a helpless little human that would resemble that person you've banged 9 month ago whom you didn't even like, men would be much pickier too. Also, "would bang" threshold being lower (changes a lot with different levels of sexual satisfaction) doesn't mean men don't see some women look much better than others, or would prefer to spend life with the worse looking. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 01:00 PM
14

1 out of every 10 Americans over the age of 18 is a millionaire. This is a true fact, Most of those are basically people who own a house, as a family. That doesn't turn one into sugar daddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:34 PM
5

Some examples I personally know of (GenZ) couples https://imgur.com/a/KvjDcQQ Dudes look average at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 11:14 AM
16

Hot girls can get a sugar daddy millionaire No, not really (as numbers do not match, to put it softly), but they can try.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 11:13 AM
1

In which country?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 11:12 AM
-3

I don't see any harm done to kids.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:51 PM
29

She falsely accused a married man of sexual assault after he refused advances Remember, this is a very very rare event. Women don't lie about sexual assault. Unless you don't stop them from cutting the line. In that case it might happen.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:40 PM
1

Measurably: Men from poor backgrounds 'twice as likely to be single'
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:53 PM
1

Most people on tinder are not looking for ONS. OK. It was born as a hookup app OK. most normal people use it to find matches OK because there’s so many people on it. Ah. Did you read your own earlier post? Ranting about how people take it as an app for ONS even though you've stated in your profile you are not into ONS? Reality is: 1) It is a ONS app 2) Men are into ONS 3) Women are not into ONS, but feel it's easier to find LTR on an ONS app, as there are "so many people" 4) There are "so many p…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 01:09 PM
0

Just to fit your agenda. Because of course...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 11:48 AM
1

ven if you profile states you are looking for relationship Many girls state "I'm looking for LTR" on a platform created for ONS. So, see, YMMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 09:37 AM
1

I can say 95% of all allegations are false because only 5% of accused are convicted. You can say that, but it will be BS of the same knd as that "viral graphic". Grey stuff is grey for a reason.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:47 PM
0

What you are saying is rubish. Be more specific. The vast majority of rape allegations in the UK are completely false. Hm. Compensation for just making an allegation, That is batshit crazy indeed. Also explains why you already have two KNOWN cases of SERIAL false rape accusers. I believe shit started with this lie (rated 3 out of 5 Pinocchio): The truth about a viral graphic on rape statistic
/r/MensRights14/11/22 05:49 PM
1

No, I have at least 2 vivid examples of women marrying guys whom "they didn't consider marriage material". Hypergamy is a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:20 PM
14

Germany has judge only courts and functions just fine. The problem here will be not abolishing jury, but "teaching" judges that false rape accusations are "extremely rare" and any sort of BS coming from accuser is not a sign of lies, but is "caused by trauma".
/r/MensRights14/11/22 05:08 PM
1

Also a sample size of 2k vs 300k. 2k in actual study. Vs 300k online lols. I cannot believe I"m having this conversation... hu What?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:58 PM
1

Last time I've checked what this forum is about (which was a minute ago) it was about: PurplePillDebate is a neutral community to discuss sex, relationship and gender issue That, besides the point that if someone creates a forum about aliens visiting planet Earth on every Friday the 13th, it doesn't make such visits real.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:14 PM
9

having a conversation Is that a covered "entertain me"? It looks like one. The last time I've checked, conversation needed at least 2 parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:37 PM
-1

Why do you think that it has anything to do with apps? Ever thought about that female entitlement might have something to do with it? Also, god forbid people on "let's hook up" platform be hyper-sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:36 PM
2

My data Online surveys are worth jack shit and the sh'thole that you've linked is blocked by security proxy, I was only able to access it via google cache. An example of actual study
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:27 PM
1

millions of mendes manosphere Huh? Is that "manosphere" with you in the room now? What does he/she/xim look like? We have politicians who said that's husbands should spank their wives Who "we" have them? it was red pill that made me interested in feminism Yeah. That's, you know, your "experience" and all. Something quite yours. Let's discuss issues at hand, and not you (or me).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:11 PM
1

Which president? Definitely not mine. Men hating is so mainstream, that a major US presidential candidate can repeat the hateful "The Future is Female" (which should not sound right even to people who do not know what stands behind these words). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart#Writing And no, I'm not scared to talk. Yet you are constantly switching subjects. Curious isn't it? manosphere It exists only in your imagination. you are ignoring it Tell me about a single law that wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 09:10 AM
1

politicians laughing About Oh. Another subject. Too scared to talk about the actual claim? Oh well. I'm not shocked, chuckle. men started it You have repeated this bullshit again. Let me rephrase it for particularly bent-over-backwards: you need to dig for shit in some shitholes to find something like that. You can listen to F*CKING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE to hear men-hating bullshit. The feminist lies are not harmless, as they are used as foundation for government policies. Lie about girls under…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:40 AM
2

More men then women think it, so (ahaha, amazing twist, so it's "cause men want to", so kind of women to do what men want, chuckle) This study contradicts other finding (and wording matters). And I love the new twist to have that female-convenient approach. The "but ikwality", "but wage gap myth" sound much less convincing indeed. A guy invited me to dinner and he let me pay for my meal. Is he a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:34 AM
1

I found out men dont like it when I pay half of the bill This is a lie. Women have 2 strong instincts at play here (that is also why women tip less): 1) Seek men who demonstrate capability and commitment to provide resources. 2) Don't share your resources with others Fun fact: testosterone pills make people more generous at sharing (there is another finding that male bosses are more generous at sharing success with the team) It sorta makes sense for a hunter/gatherer societies, as hunters would …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:29 AM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is simply disguised men hating, founded on fantasies, outright lies and anything, but science. It is just a tool to bash men and whine about imaginary "patriarchy" (a system created by men FOR men which never existed) and how oppressed women, who are actually so privileged it is funny to hear about oppression, are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:25 AM
4

Terrifying story, but you cannot starve to death in 5 days, even if you are skinny.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:22 AM
1

And what percentage of women could vote? And this matters in "overwhelming majority of men could not vote" because...? Oh it doesn't. Thanks for typing useless sentence then. Female rules were more likely to wage wars than male rulers. Proof? Before I share the proof I need to know what will happen. Like you'd say "oh, so that means I was not quit right about that nazi/commie collective gender guilt"... "oh, why am I still doing that collective guilt shit, when I just claimed it's shit and stupi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:12 AM
1

The sex positive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:40 AM
0

I've always understood patriarchy as male-dominated rule. Very convenient. Except when "for the benefit of men" disappears from the feminist chain of lies there goes entire "oppression" and "privilege" fantasy. There is no group as privileged in western society, as women. From health spending, shocking incarceration gap (ACCOUNTING FOR the type of crime and whether or not it is first time and other nuances), to insanity in education system, to "believe all women", to "we don't have enough boats,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:39 AM
1

Does "women are inferior" count? As what? Do you realize that for every single piece of wild shit you can find in your imaginary "manosphere" there is a cohort of shit that is literally MAINSTREAM in media, in all places, from "UN women" shithole, to Australian department of health shithole (79% female, spends 2 billion on girls/women and 1 million boys/men, convenient ain't it?) to US f*cking presidential candidate who changed "The Future is Female"? Do you know where "The Future (if there is o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:33 AM
2

Why would it be so disproportionate then? There are 2 sides of it, right? Like, you know, men who want to fuck many women. Like, you know, that Mongol dude who had thousands of children. We do see hunter-gatherer tribes even today, with very peculiar approach to who is who's husband. The more influential men get mini harems, while older, not so attractive widows get younger men as husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:27 AM
1

you know kindergarten doesn't start until age 5 It is terrifying how low someone can go to double down on apparent bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:25 AM
5

To me, this is rather compelling evidence supporting the idea that women are extremely selective. This assumes women had a choice and were not taken by force. There are good reasons to doubt it. Also, 1 in 5 is hardly extremely selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:45 PM
3

Oversized female bottom.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:39 PM
0

I am very much aware why no one is getting married and having kids. Now we need someone from Somalia to get even more "scientific" here. No, wait, we need someone who is from Somalia, has left it, but has half family in there and also is very much aware why people get married a lot of Somalia because of Feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:36 PM
1

Keyword: completely. It is actually impossible to completely disagree with both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:35 PM
1

This is just arguing from emotion Perhaps on your side. Men have been allowed to vote since voting was a concept Only about 4% of men in ancient Rome could vote. And men started those wars The fact that someone states that fallacy as some sort of gotcha is amusing. So, let me break this to you: 1) You are you. Not anyone else. You are not responsible for what others are doing, regardless of whether they have genitalia that are like yours, or not. See? It isn't hard. That "collective guilt" recen…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:31 PM
1

21 studios literally having hats with "make women property again" written on them. Oh. Really? THAT is why boys are hammered in US education system? That is why it is being lied about domestic violence being gender issue? That is why there is a never ending chain of lies about sexual victimization? Good to know. Eveil, evil "21 studios" whatever the heck that is. a polish site similar to reddit. Rright. Does "kill all women" count? I think I've read "kill all women" there. Or wait it wasn't over…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 09:25 PM
3

The birthrate and marital decline are because of a lack of acceptance of feminism Oh, of all possibilities, it must be feminism, right? Because it's "convenient to make a bogus point that way"? Well, that is fine. So Somalia and Niger, who accepted "feminism" to a point they are #2 and #1 respectively at female fertility. abuse and mistreatment towards women Rape doesn't count right? If you thought I was joking about raping a woman = you've married her in Somalia: no I was not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:54 PM
1

Not true women didn't even have the right to vote until the 1920s Nice twist isn't it? Remind me, when did all men on the planet get voting rights? Oh it was shortly before women? And b1tching about it is justified, because? We conveniently forget about it? That's... convenient. Who else would be at fault For anything. Of course it's men. I can't believe what I'm reading. I love b1tching about "why can't women breastfeed kids in public!!!". Heck, who told you it's men who are complaining? (typin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:50 PM
3

South Korea also has the lowest birthrate in the world And Niger/Somalia (where a man can marry a woman by raping her (!!!)) are the top 2. So, what was your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:31 PM
4

Dayum. Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:49 PM
1

Liberal feminism is one of the earliest forms of feminism Oh. stating that women's secondary status in society is based on unequal opportunities and segregation from men. Pro-to feminists were privileged women from high society, that had education/resources access that 99% of men in their countries didn't have. Who mixed dubious fantasies and outright lies (i.e. like one by Frau W. about lack of female Shakespeares being caused by imaginary prohibition) to form some sort of "we are soo oppressed…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:48 PM
0

Gatekeeping in gender me thinks. Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_sex_wars but the dark, sex negative side won, apparently. (which leads to hilarious effects, e.g. recent Mortal Kombat where literal hookers (per lore) are wearing burkas, in a gore game in which you can examine human anatomy, oh, also, almost naked men totally fine)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:26 PM
2

There are many variations, but they don't vary much in terms of men hating, strong pro-female bias. It is still 99%+ of the movement. TERF is just a stronger expression of such bias/men hating. As for "liberal feminism", remind me, what that is supposed to mean, as US definition of "liberal" is quite far from liberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 02:22 PM
2

when I discovered red pill spaces. Could you link one of those places, as perhaps it would help me to stop seeing insanely deceiving nature of vast majority of stuff coming from Feminists, from wage gap to domestic violence to lies about rarity of false rape accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:46 PM
1

Disagree: pretty much everything that involves sexuality There are 2 radically different feminist takes on sexuality: 1) "Every heterosexual sex act is rape" (Dworkin and co, she also happened to be not that attractive, not sure if it is important) 2) "F*ck at will! Also, 100+ partners not a problem!" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_sex_wars Hard to completely disagree with both takes, ain't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:45 PM
2

don’t understand the core of what it is That is "no true scottsman" in its finest. Reality is: women have insane in-group gender bias. Let women anywhere near majority, you'll get situation like in Australia: 2 billion spent on women/girls issues, 1 million on men/boys by a health department (that also happens to be 79% female)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:43 PM
1

I don't want to be a SAHM barefoot in the kitchen Sorry, you don't want to be what? PS How do you explain to yourself that Kindergardens were founded 200 years ago. Was it to free "women in kitchens"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:42 PM
1

There's different subsets of feminism though. There are largely 2: 1) gender feminism (essentially gender tribalism) => about 99%+ of the movement 2) equity feminism (essentially feminist renegates like Christina Sommers or Cathy Young or Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first female shelter for victims of DV) => less than 1% of the movement
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:41 PM
0

women are entitled to their own economic and legal autonomy. Amazing thing to think... in 2021. Something something (lie about) could not have bank account something.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:39 PM
0

How would you define the term "patriarchy"? A popular lie that ruled BY men means ruled FOR men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:38 PM
1

In countries like South Korea, "feminism" is a synonym for "unhinged, aggressive woman" For a good reason. In the West, I see various groups: 1) "Bend over backwards for women and call it equality!!!" 2) People who try to find "nuance" in different waves, which makes me chuckle as lies/fantasies multiplied by dubious, mostly in-principle unfalsifiable theories were there from day 1. (e.g. Frau Wolf complaining about lack of female Shakespeare being caused by "women were not allowed to write poem…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 01:37 PM
1

That's not what "being romantic" means to me, but that's beside the point. The most likely reason for why men have to demonstrate ability and commitment to provide resources is that: For 99% of our history as species, we were hunter-gatherers
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 11:56 AM
1

Women are naturally risk averse. 30% of humans are afraid of flying, even though, going by stats, that ain't rational. Fears are generated by chimp part of our brains and are irrational, naturally.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:35 AM
1

Welp, buy, you know, equipment, and enjoy your life, doh. Would you want to have a higher libido wife or partner? Majority of men would want a higher libido wife, especially, at 40+.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 05:06 PM
1

Sex isn’t commitment? Not necessarily (e.g. adultery). Carrying a child isn’t commitment? Neither (see above).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 04:53 PM
10

Women have a very strong automatic in-group bias. Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Unlike men. That's why Feminism looks like anything, but fighting for equality. Because it really is about "for women", but much less so "about equality". Else said groups would not lie about domestic violence, false rape accusations, pay gap, would realize empathy gap, incarceration gap, "devastated by divorce" gap, and other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 03:49 PM
1

Whatever. So "women are goods in Iraq" is your living experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 06:21 PM
-1

Women don't "commit", what is there to commit, chuckle? It's up to resource provider to show the commitment. With a stretch, one can reference to having sex as "female commitment", but I'm afraid this statement might trigger too many.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 06:21 PM
2

Lol, but, I don't see MRA angle of it, to be honest. PS Part I chuckled at "despite being non-binary" he/xim/shim "feels confident playing women". I also thought being "non-binary" she cannot be a "man".
/r/MensRights05/11/22 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter