TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

beleriand Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by beleriand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

you mean /r/theonion
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:40 PM
1

seemed like he was acting
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:58 AM
57

*witch
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:58 AM
18

One problem is that a lot of people see anti-feminism as being the same as misogyny. So, when they say that all they see is misogyny, they're not just talking about misogyny, but any critique of feminism. I'm anti-feminism, but I'm very pro-woman. I treat women with empathy and consideration. I look up to impressive women. I enjoy talking to interesting women. I enjoy a woman's friendship as I would anyone's. A lot of girl's who I've dated have been feminists and they've always been very appreci…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:14 AM
4

I think in this case she was using it as an excuse for leaving him.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:58 PM
1

It's not even about redpillers. It's about completely fictitious people constructed from all kinds of sources - some red pill here, a little bit of PUA there, maybe a litle dash of something some high school kid said to her ten years ago, a pinch of brony, etc.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:19 PM
1

my body, my choice
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:14 PM
7

Do you mean who benefits the most from gender roles? I don't think it's masculine people. Hyper-masculine women such as some lesbians or female bodybuilders who take steroids certainly don't occupy a space of high regard in our society. Then, this entire sub is about how men suffer from cultural ideas about what men should do on account of their masculinity, so I'm not going to go into it except to say that society uses manliness as an excuses to use men as expendable beasts of burden.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:18 AM
4

I think it has to do with violating a cultural norm. Gender roles are particularly important so words for people who violate them are going to be exceptionally powerful. There are less powerful insults that involve people violating less-important norms - neckbeard, basement dweller, mouth breather.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:55 AM
9

My parents were both feminists. They grew up in the 60's. I don't identify as an MRA, but when I started criticizing feminism, they came at me with all the usual bullshit - men being murderers, men causing wars, blah blah blah. But, I just kept ranting about it, talking about historical perspectives, how the right to vote actually came about, etc. Over the course of a month I eventually wore down their defenses and now I'm pretty sure my mom is on my side. She at least acknowledges that young wh…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:36 PM
2

Now, she sure as hell felt entitled to his love. Is it cultural misandry? No. It's just one batshit lady.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:31 PM
1

So, what's up, dude? Was that not jack shit?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:57 AM
1

http://workplace.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/10/31/attacker-avoids-prison-again.html
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:46 PM
3

Shouldn't it be last place?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:30 AM
7

How about the ability to pick their own sexual partners without being threatened by jealous psychopaths? Wait, you want the ability to pick you own sexual partners without being threatened by jealous psychopaths all to yourself? That sounds a little unfair.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:20 AM
3

Unfortunately, most people are incapable of recognizing the complexity of reality. In fact, the complexity of reality is almost absent in the language itself and the concepts that are available. Most people rely on very simple models for the way things work, and those models are incommensurate with reality. It's almost impossible to break out of those models, whatever they are - linguistic, or logical.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:34 AM
6

What I meant by "equal to women" was equal to women. Okay, it just seems to me like internet feminists, which is a huge, outspoken group of people (large enough that it's suitable to talk about them without talking about "real" feminists, and who I am talking about), speak about being equal to men as though it would be a state of the entire society. Well, I don't believe there is any such state as simply equal to men. I think it's a meaningless notion. Like it literally has no meaning. When I sa…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:18 AM
5

The way it seems to me, and I'm not all that knowledgeable about "real" feminism, but the way it seems to me, based on all I've heard from internet feminists, is that feminism is a worldview. It seeks to find the underlying anti-woman nature of society, or explain the entirety of society in terms of its negative attitudes towards women, as though it is the main element or driving force within every facet of society. So, then, they end up seeing everything that happens to them in terms of this wo…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:23 AM
17

I didn't say anything about feminism.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:08 AM
20

draw attention to the issues so that they can be fixed, not draw attention to the victims so people will feel bad for them or so that they can feel bad for themselves. how is that confusing?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:59 AM
24

No, I don't get the feeling from this subreddit that anyone cares what people outside of the subreddit feel about them. No one here wants other people to feel bad for them, and no one here wants to feel like a victim. Like I said, it's a place to address real issues that affect men and how they can be dealt with - for instance, not being able to get custody of one's children. No one wants to feel like a victim in such a case. No one wants other people to feel bad for them about such a case. What…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:14 AM
2

This doesn't really have anything to do with the point of the video, but he uses "metal illness" to mean "insane" or "psychotic," which are not the same. At ~16:00 he says, this is bordering on mental illness, when really Elliot had probably been deep in depression for years and years by that point, suffering from social anxiety, and also suffering from some kind of personality disorder, which are all mental illnesses.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:51 PM
2

Not really. I don't think it had much to do with being male, white, or any of the reasons you stated.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:26 PM
5

Yeah, but the article is talking about a specific type of change. It's not simply different than another man's. Changes in the amygdala occur in women from hormones in pregnancy and childbirth, said Ms. Feldman, who is also an adjunct professor at Yale University in New Haven, Conn. In men, the brain area responsible for interpreting their child's needs recruits the amygdala to activate only when a mother isn't around, she said in an email. The mothers had the highest activation of the amygdala …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:17 PM
1

Whoops - thought we were talking about the shooting in California.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:18 PM
2

Its capitalizing on the tragic event, and making something that was caused by a mental illness into a women's rights movement. Yeah, I agree, and that's why I think yesallwomen is wrong, among other reasons. Though I wouldn't say it was caused by mental illness. I'd say mental illness was a contributing factor in stew of interrelated factors. I just don't really see the connection to grieving families, though, and that's all I was speaking about. The families are probably with each other, grievi…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:12 AM
-5

Do you really think yesallwomen is interfering with the families' grieving though?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:56 AM
1

What? You think people knew that the boys were killed and didn't do anything about it? Edit: Seriously. Am I missing information? Did people really find out and not do anything? Thought we were talking about the shooting - nevermind what I said.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:53 AM
10

it's fine if a woman harms a man because women can't harm men
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:50 AM
11

It's a play on "not all men" that means all women experience sexism or misogyny or whatever.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:48 AM
7

OP wasn't raped, though, unless he said it in a different post. I mean, if you want male-rape to be taken seriously (which it obviously should be, and isn't) don't start calling things that aren't rape rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:19 AM
35

What is the "neckbeard feminist type?" Are they also fedora sporting bronies? Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are feminisnts. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are rapists. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are MRA's. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are redpillers. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are betas. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are bluepilers. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are white knights. Fedora sporting brony neckbeards are redditors. Hmm, could it be that they're just an eas…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:16 AM
19

He was a member of an anti-PUA community and PUAhate.com. How does one get from that to considering him a PUA?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:50 AM
9

Well, I don't think most feminists would argue that men deserve it. The problem is that they actively reinforce the notion of women being the helpless victims of men, which is at odds with the idea that men can be abused by women. So, when people see female on male abuse, it doesn't register as actual abuse. It might even make it look like the abuser is getting what's coming to him. It's not that they think men deserve abuse. It's that their worldview makes it so that it's not abuse.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:34 AM
-8

Having a bloody face doesn't really prove you weren't attempting to rape her. She's certainly in the wrong for beating you and crying "rape." But, I think the guys were right for coming to her aid. If they had proceeded to beat you then they would have been wrong. But, if they had simply chased you down, detained you, called the cops, and let them sort it out, then I don't think there would've been anything wrong with their actions. The whole situation would have been wrong, but it would have al…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:26 AM
10

When has feminism gone against the norm of men being thought of as abusers of women? That's not been my experience of feminism, which I find constantly perpetuates the idea of women being the victims of male abuse, not just internet feminists either - take the Man Up Campaign for instance.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:19 AM
2

Oh, that makes the statement make more sense, then. I wasn't reading very carefully.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:39 PM
4

No, it still doesn't make sense. They didn't have the proper facilities, or properly trained guards, or enough money, to not tie something around this guy's genitals until they became infected to the point that they caused him to die? How does it have anything to do with being equipped?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:18 PM
7

I don't think this has anything to do with feminism. I think it has to do with evil people who were looking for any excuse to exercise their sadistic tendencies, and the lewd gesture just happened to be it.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:02 PM
8

They were too "poorly equipped" to not torture a man to death. That doesn't even make sense to me.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:59 PM
-4

Fuck that. I'm all for forced abortion in this case (unless the kid doesn't want it to happen). Talk about taking away someone's childhood. "Hey, you just want to be an 11 year old kid? Too bad. You're a fucking dad, now. Deal with that." One large reason mere sex with minors is wrong is because they can't understand the nature of it. How can an 11 year old understand and cope with having fathered a kid under these circumstances? As he ages, it'll begin to become more clear to him that he was ra…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 08:10 PM
-3

It's funny because it keeps getting farther and farther away from that person's comment, which, again, is evidence of nothing. So, we're not talking about double standard in being publicly humiliated anymore, only how the crimes are portrayed. That's what we're talking about now because one anonymous person happened to say that they didn't think a woman who blew a horse should be publicly humiliated (which she was). Why not just skip ahead and bring up male suicide rates? http://www.nydailynews.…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:31 PM
-7

Yeah, and I don't see how this is evidence of a double standard. It's one person's opinion, and you don't know if that person has the same opinion about men or not. For all you know, that commenter has posted a comment somewhere else disagreeing with a man being publicly humiliated. And, the issue is just that particular comment because the woman was publicly humiliated, so that couldn't be the double standard you're talking about. Other woman have been publicly humiliated for deviant behavior t…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:06 AM
-10

How do you know that person isn't against publicly humiliating anyone? The woman was publicly humiliated, and the commenter didn't think she should have been. The comment was on an article about the woman. I don't see how that has anything to do with men, or why the commenter shouldn't have said it, or why the commenter should have mentioned men.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:00 AM
-13

What does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:50 AM
1

I don't get it.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:35 AM
6

Where is this taking place - a weekly feminist meeting? Or, is she describing day to day interaction between normal people?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:57 AM
9

Anytime I see a woman on the street I think to myself that she could just pull out a gun and shoot me, and as a man, there'd be nothing I could to stop her.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:39 PM
0

Yeah, that hyperbolic statement that has no relation to anything I've said is common sense. You're either trolling or fucking worse than feminists.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:08 PM
0

If by "actual attacker" you mean the individual who made physical contact with her, then no the "actual attacker" wasn't attacked. I don't care what you see. Yes, it's perfectly acceptable. The person wasn't merely a friend, wasn't merely "other people". The person was there, was part of the situation, part of a group, which had attacked her.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:38 PM
1

Sexual assault. Your notion of "commission" is naive. Anyway, we're not talking about whether he committed a crime, but whether she had a right to defend herself against him - two different things.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:06 PM
6

Wow. That's an incredible story. It's hard to believe that so many people would go along with it.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:01 PM
1

Being a friend of someone is not a crime. You're right. It's not...unless of course by "being a friend" you mean being part of a group that commits a crime, then it is.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:54 PM
1

No, together they formed a unit, which attacked her. He didn't do anything to stop his friend or distance himself from the friend, then clearly demonstrated which side he was on when he started swearing at the girl. He was part of a group that attacked her. Saying he wasn't is like saying "I didn't punch her, it was my arm who did."
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:37 PM
4

Take it as a "yes" to what you meant, but not what you said. Yes, I do agree with her violently attacking that person who was part of a group that sexually assaulted her, then continued to act in a threatening manner - a person who did not attempt to distance himself from the assaulter. No, I do not agree with attacking a bystander. Your shit is transparent.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:30 PM
1

It probably took her that long to process what was going on. The fact that she didn't immediately attack the dude who groped her shows she wasn't looking for a fight. The dude swearing at her probably cemented in her mind that she was being confronted by a party of two men, who had no concern for her welfare, and she decided to defend herself. Flight wasn't a option as they had bikes and she was on foot. Good for her, and fuck OP.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:25 PM
4

You're clearly on the wrong side of this one. Calling the dude a "bystander" is pure bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:21 PM
6

because breast cancer kills more people, and younger people. It robs humanity of more life: http://i.imgur.com/7huFVSe.png prostate is on top, breast on bottom source: seer.cancer.gov/
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter