belisaurius Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-6	Criminology student, 22, who falsely accused a taxi driver of raping her after he refused to accept her kebab-soaked £10 note is JAILED for 16 months Two wrongs make a right, obviously.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/17 10:23 PM
-23	Criminology student, 22, who falsely accused a taxi driver of raping her after he refused to accept her kebab-soaked £10 note is JAILED for 16 months T_D is all about promoting president Trump. But is also the most transparent and accepting subreddit on the internet? Someone's rhetoric got lost somewhere. You'd think the more broad would give more leeway. I mean, being about one gender isn't that broad, particularly in comparison to, you know, The President of the United States. But I think that's probably splitting hairs. Even worse, only one makes a general assumption about you when you post/comment on a sub that's seen as "antagonistic". I…	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/17 07:57 PM
-21	Criminology student, 22, who falsely accused a taxi driver of raping her after he refused to accept her kebab-soaked £10 note is JAILED for 16 months who would ban you if you even commented on a T_D post. Better or worse than being banned from T_D for not joining the jerk?	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/17 07:50 PM
1	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Either that or... You've degenerated the vocabulary of this conversation so far that it's impossible to talk about it. You then strawman me as being for "treatment for treatment's sake". Yeah, you're saying that a doctor has no right to mercifully end someone's life and that they must do everything in their power to extend pain for just one more second. That's literally the definition of 'treat them because we can, not because we should'. while justifying things that are done as ethical because …	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/17 07:51 PM
1	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder I will not be cowed into using an ever shifting set of acceptable words. Partial Birth Abortion. You don't have to be cowed if you're actually brainwashed. It's a freaking propaganda phrase like "Work will set you free". There is no such case! Are you serious? It's very uncommon but it does happen. Sometimes there's immune interactions between the fetus and mother that can kill the mother. Sometimes there's infections that spread one way or the other. Sometimes there's genetic disposition toward…	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/17 03:09 PM
6	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Because something effects your body doesn't mean you have rights to destroy someone else's. The argument is whether a collection of cells that cannot exist on its own is "someone else". Most would say it isn't. But there is never ever a justifiable reason to murder the kid while you do it. How about the cases where the child will live, for a short time, in unimaginable pain? How about cases where the early delivery is a death sentence for the mother? Those are the only two cases where late term …	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 07:49 PM
2	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder I like questions like this because it's equally interesting to give you a nuanced answer. Bodily autonomy means many things; that includes freedom from any medical procedure that anyone could ever do, now or in the future. In this hypothetical world; the line on legality wouldn't change because medical intervention prior to the natural viability point outside of the mother remains her choice. Specifically, the reason why the 'viability point' is relevant has nothing to do with medical technology…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 06:20 PM
2	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Great, so you acknowledge when you decide it has rights is arbitrary. No. It's not arbitrary. It's as precise as medical science can be. Please try to keep up. Like we touched on earlier, it's called critical reading. Inanimate things do not have rights, and there is a clear and obvious dividing line when a bundle of cells transitions from a thing to a living person. Even then, its rights are intertwined with those of its mother. Just as my rights are intertwined with yours, if in a less persona…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 06:04 PM
2	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder I mean really, you're arguing a human life is not a human life simply based on where it is on the development process. Yes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:54 PM
3	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Your argument is "a baby is not actually a baby until it is medically viable" Day 0: Conception - a Zygote forms Day 2: The zygote transitions to a Blastocyst Day 6: The blastocyst transitions to an Embryo Day 70: The embryo transitions to a Fetus Day 150: The fetus becomes viable Day 280: The fetus is born and becomes a Baby I want whatever you're smoking dude. Feel free to purchase this textbook, roll it up, and smoke it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:39 PM
2	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder "a human baby only receives its right to life once it's medically viable." It's not a "human baby" before that point, so your argument is fundamentally invalid. Keep trying, though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:29 PM
3	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder The guy talking about 1% of abortion cases and using it to support abortions for all cases That's not what I'm doing. I'll go ahead and repeat what I said so that you understand it better. There are two different periods during a pregnancy. The first is the period before the fetus is viable. In that period, it has no rights. The second period is after the fetus is viable. In that period, it has limited rights that can be subordinated to the mother's in certain medically necessary cases. Please d…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:19 PM
17	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder It's a very, very rare medical procedure done in very select circumstances. He's getting downvoted for the bullshit politicizing at the end of it. Late term abortions are very rare and all of them are done for legitimate medical reasons. Did you even read what we're talking about? It has nothing to do with all abortions. Only those where the fetus is theoretically past the viability date. You want stats, google it your fucking self, I don't work for you. And apparently your eyes don't work for y…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:15 PM
3	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder yet continue to imply all abortions are medically necessary because the woman's life is in danger. I've repeatedly and vehemently told you that this isn't true. Please, stop setting up a strawman. Again, in situations when a mother's life is in danger due to her pregnancy or other complications, I support treatment for the mother which may include an abortion. Then you probably need to stop arguing. All late-term abortions in the United States are done for this reason. This is not the case for m…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 05:12 PM
8	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Competent experts should be able to justify their position with facts and sound reasoning, while quacks crumble when challenged. And I think they've done so on this topic, for decades. My intent wasn't a blanket "trust everyone with a degree", but rather that this particular topic has been argued to death, legislated to death, and it should have been laid to rest already.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 04:52 PM
10	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder I didn't misconstrue your words, it's literally what you wrote. Nope. I have no idea why you're not grasping the subtleties of this. Please explain how killing the baby is medically necessary for late term pregnancies. If the baby or the mother is going to die anyway, a medical abortion is the merciful solution to a shithole problem that no one wants to be a position to deal with. Late term abortions are incredibly rare; they're not done with casual disdain. They're complicated and hard; they re…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 04:49 PM
14	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder And now you're implying all abortions are necessary from a medical standpoint. No. I'm saying that late term abortions are all medically necessary. As we discussed, there's multiple boundaries here. Please don't misconstrue my words. And yet, nothing I've said about the procedure is untrue and is an accurate account of what actually happens. Do you want me to describe in vicious detail how a vasectomy works? No? Descriptions are irrelevant. Only professional opinion is. The fact that you find th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 04:32 PM
13	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Ah, so I suppose you support the much more common procedure in the early terms of pregnancy which include crushing of the skull or insertion of tubes to suck out the brain? I support anything the medical profession tells me is a necessary medical procedure. It is not, and never will be, my place to question the competence of experts. Using shocking language to try to weasel your way into a position of judgement is shameful. How does a person have a right over the life of another human being? If …	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 04:16 PM
32	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder Describe what actually happens in a partial abortion and enjoy your downvotes and get called a "fucking idiot." It's a very, very rare medical procedure done in very select circumstances. He's getting downvoted for the bullshit politicizing at the end of it. blindly support the woman's ability to kill unborn babies because "my body my choice." This is insane too. You're casually dismissing a rights based argument because you don't like it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 03:57 PM
8	Woman gives birth, tries to flush baby down toilet while at work. Said she didn’t know she was pregnant. Charged with felony child abuse, inflicting great bodily injury, and attempted murder No, it isn't. It's a very rare medical procedure; and no one is celebrating it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/17 03:55 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " You can't even acknowledge the guy tried to write it respectfully I told you, several times, that he's entirely correct. At no point did I say that his word choices were inherently disrespectful. Please try to refrain from building a strawman. Look, if this was some half-written shit like we're both doing, I'd understand, but it wasn't. And the media hid portions of it and tried to control its perceptions. Sure, it's the media. I'm unconcerned with what they're doing. It's not relevant to the bu…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 08:02 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Here's the rub, they're not racist hiring practices. Case closed, fam.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 07:42 PM
2	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Awkward that this isn't about hiring practices then, right? This white guy wasn't fired because he's white. He was fired because he's a flapping mouth idiot who voluntarily walked himself into a shitty conflict with his entire company. 'Stupid' isn't a protected class.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 07:37 PM
0	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Well, it sounds like you have a fundamental disagreement with the suite of rights our citizens enjoy. There's not much else we can talk about, then.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 06:59 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " First, there's no reason to expect that this document was 'private'. Second, how is Google going to find out who it is? The journalist sure as shit isn't going to tell him. Presumably the leaker was smart enough to remove it in a non-traceable way as well (what with them being a Google Employee). Third, why would Google even want to? This whole episode makes them look good with their target group: wealthy, liberal, coastal elites.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 06:58 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Google is outright telling you to share your opinion. Once again, they're not asking you to share anything that pops into your head. They're asking you to share business relevant opinions. Things like 'I wish the toilets were cleaned more often', or 'here's a service we could maybe make money on'. Maybe you could stretch that to basic corporate culture things like 'I don't think everyone's opinion should be considered'. It's distinctly outside of that to write a research paper on gender differen…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 06:56 PM
-1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Remind me again how's that's different from Hobby Lobby and other conservative organizations? Can't have it both ways, fam.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 06:34 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " the appropriate channels that are designed to get input Internal Google staff communication is certainly not the right place to talk about this kind of thing. It's an HR issue, maybe. Moreover, a random software engineer is certainly not the right person to be raising this point. backfiring on google Is it? Wishful thinking much? The people who actually work there, buy Google stock and otherwise use Google products are predominantly not interested in this shit. i bet you all the males are talkin…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 05:50 PM
0	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " How many of them are there, again? Remind me, also, which ones haven't been fired for doing stupid shit. Come back when you have a legit problem, not a strawman.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 05:42 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " their business is politics Again, only certain sections of the organization and certainly not some random software engineer. Context is, as you should know, key. Internal discussion forums are not limited to technological problems. No, but it certainly doesn't extend to things outside the job role of the employee and it absolutely would exclude culture/HR issues. The only way he used the wrong medium for this discussion is if Google had a big sticky post at the top essentially saying "No politic…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 05:40 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " The issue is that, while statistical understandings of gender differences are relevant when we're talking about broad issues (like gender representation in various professions), it's not relevant when you're working with individuals. When you work alongside someone in a safe workplace, one should never be concerned that your team-mate believes that you're inherently different than them. Unfortunately for this gentleman, while what he said is correct, exposing his broadly relevant ideas to indivi…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 05:30 PM
2	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " opinions and ideas about Google Business ideas not political ones. Why is it so hard to grasp that no one wants his highly political bullshit in the office? I would be unwilling to work with someone who lacks the basic understanding of context and appropriate venues for airing divisive opinions. Moreover, you're acting like people don't understand what he's saying. Of course everyone does. It's not like the people who work at Google are retarded and need basic education in the differences betwee…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 04:24 PM
1	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " document he prepared was full of citations, pointing out inefficiencies and bad assumptions in the company's process for dealing with a lack of diversity int he workplace. Strictly irrelevant. Good intentions and effort are unrelated to the core problem: sharing the document in a work-related way. Someone else in the group shared it more broadly. Maybe, just maybe, dude should have thought about that before he went off half-cocked. I absolutely understand why he did what he did, and I get the se…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 03:43 PM
2	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " It absolutely is shit-flinging. It is not his job to provide commentary on political decisions of his superiors. He is not paid for that. It is an unwelcome and hostile thing for unrelated employees to start spouting off about shit that they're not responsible for. Regardless of the tone or content of his missive, the topic itself is not business appropriate. McDonalds and Walmart don't employ people who advocate for Unions. Full stop. Google doesn't employ people who advocate for fringe politic…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 03:32 PM
7	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " How in the world did you construe what I said that way? It's incredibly extremist to assume something so absolute. What I said was that you, the employee, have the obligation to fit in with your colleagues. It's called "acting normal". It's why we go to school. You are entirely welcome to your opinions, and within the business context you are expected to speak up about relevant opinions. Do you think the management is doing something wrong? Write it up and present it in a respectful fashion. Wha…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 03:27 PM
5	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " The only thing it lead to is the loss of his job and a further nationwide giggle at Red Pilling. The point of any successful philosophical movement is to find an avenue to discuss and convince without causing the general public to dismiss your ideas. This was not that. It's not brave or courageous to 'push back' in the workplace. It's the sign of someone who completely missed the point of professionalism.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 02:41 PM
45	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " It doesn't matter what you feel like it was. What matters is you don't throw things at work. You show up, you do your job, you get paid. You do not editorialize. You do not do things that make your colleague uncomfortable.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 01:31 PM
35	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Workplace professionalism is what matters. This isn't your daddy's coal mine.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 01:03 PM
134	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " It's not about narrative. It's about a professional working environment. You don't throw shit at work, it's that simple.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 01:02 PM
31	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " You can staple as many roses to a log of shit as you want, and people will still smell your shit. The point of diplomacy isn't to 'hide' your ideas, it's to present them in a way that your audience can hear them without being turned off. Finding the right words to express yourself to an audience is just as important as the idea itself.	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 01:02 PM
3	EU member states higher on Gender Equality Index tend to have higher prevalence of violence against women \| Aka "more feminists = more violence"? Or, simply, the higher the country is on the Gender Equality Index, the more safe women feel reporting violence against them.	/r/MensRights	27/07/17 04:09 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves First, they're not equivalent words. Second, the male one isn't derogatory. Given both of your false presumptions, it isn't a double standard. Come back with real gender inequality. This MSJW shit isn't worth my time.	/r/MensRights	13/07/17 12:40 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves As if this is a double standard. If you believe that, I have this mountain to sell you. Ignore the moles on it.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 08:48 PM
-1	Try Googling it for yourselves Sounds like you can't get over your own inadequacies. Hopefully, in the future, you can unclench just a bit. In the interim, please don't visit my country. We don't need more of your kind here.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 07:22 PM
-1	Try Googling it for yourselves Bottom line dude, if if feminists can make an issue out of "manspreading" and, far from being told they're doing a disservice to their gender or movement, manage to get laws past banning it, I think we can allow ourselves to point out a mild example of linguistic stupidity on this sub without being deserving of that same attack. Come back to me when some nutjob who says he's an MRA firebombs the Oxford Dictionary's offices or something. And here is your hysterical point. You don't like "SJW" cul…	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 07:02 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves half of Americans live pay check to pay check. They don't understand basic budgeting. You're blaming the victims for the income inquality in this country? What kind of despicable person blames the people trapped in abject poverty for failing to 'use their bootstraps'? Damn, dude. Only jobs that require critical thinking would indicate the person has critical thinking skills. There are many (many) jobs that do not require anything more than to do what you're told. This is absolutely disgusting. B…	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 06:58 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves What? The concept of basic budgeting, finding and holding gainful employment, building relationships and families all point to the fact that the overwhelming majority of American citizens have basic critical reasoning skills. I have no idea how someone could be so conceited about their own intelligence or dismissive of others to claim that 'below average' people aren't capable of basic critical reasoning. What kind of horseshit generalization is that?	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 04:59 PM
0	Try Googling it for yourselves Given your attitude I expect you're just going to dismiss any real issues on this sub out of hand, because you've already decided we're wrong and don't need to know anything more. I am a man, my friend. I completely understand the need for discussion of issues where men are massively injured by societal bias: parental rights, criminal responsibility, etc. What I'm suggesting is that when you pollute the conversation, as a subreddit, with inane and petty things like this post, you lose the audien…	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 04:56 PM
-5	Try Googling it for yourselves Are you saying that to be taken seriously we have to be in permanent rage mode about only the more severe issues at all times? No. I'm suggesting that the entire premise of your subreddit is flawed and this massively upvoted post only underlines that. News flash, 95% of the crowd that comes in from /r/all won't take us seriously anyway. Ask yourself why.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 04:34 PM
2	Try Googling it for yourselves I don't think that's very clear at all actually. Oh? Do you see approximately 150 million American adults completely failing to hold their lives together?	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 04:33 PM
-10	Try Googling it for yourselves So you get to have it both ways? When it's not 'serious' enough you can claim it's a 'joke' and when it is serious, you can cry injustice? Why should anyone believe that you're serious if your whole MO is just 'whatever works best for us in the moment'?	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 03:26 PM
-12	Try Googling it for yourselves Except the only reason that this disparity matters is if you elevate it to enough of an 'injustice' that there's room to be a victim. It's so unbelievably petty that I find it hard to believe anyone could seriously consider it worth discussing unless it reinforced their views.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 03:21 PM
2	Try Googling it for yourselves That's not true at all. Very clearly, the overwhelming majority of people both learn and make critical decisions about their daily lives. I do not think it is beyond anyone to apply basic critical reasoning skills. You're making a hugely dismissive generalization of half of the country, essentially comparing them to uneducated children.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 02:57 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves I also think that, regardless of bell curves, everyone is capable of being a critical thinker. It shouldn't take a massive amount of innate intelligence to determine that a single dictionary phrase can't "pollute" you.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 02:29 PM
7	Try Googling it for yourselves Suck up what, exactly? I don't define my manliness through exterior markers. I am the man I want to be, neither google nor anyone else is going to change that.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 01:55 PM
1	Try Googling it for yourselves You'd think that anyone who took and completed an English class would be intelligent enough to not have their mind "polluted" by reading a single descriptive word in a dictionary somewhere.	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 01:23 PM
3	Try Googling it for yourselves Nah, don't worry dude. I'm with you on this one. We're both gonna get shit on by this community for refusing to join in the victimhood. Edit: As predicted, the community has come forth to explain how it's entirely okay to whine about shit like this: feminists can make an issue out of "manspreading" and, far from being told they're doing a disservice to their gender or movement, manage to get laws past banning it Go ahead, justify "but they did it too, waaaaaaahhh, my fee-fees are hurt."	/r/MensRights	12/07/17 01:22 PM