TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bellpepperblues Archive

View 0 posts and 996 comments by bellpepperblues on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory_in_the_United_States https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 10:42 PM
2

I think the your mom jokes are an attempt at offending me but I haven’t talked to my mom in years. I really don’t give a shit one way or the other. Now if you said you fucked my dad, I’d be pissed off so if you wanna hurt my feelings go with that instead
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 10:24 PM
3

Eh no try again
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 09:46 PM
0

A reality show from the early 2000s isn’t staged? Boy have I got some bad news for you, g.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 09:17 PM
6

I don’t have one. Try again.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 09:13 PM
5

That’s such a middle school insult. Like we’re you actually intending on offending someone with that?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 09:07 PM
2

It doesn’t really offend me. It just kinda makes you look weak.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 08:21 PM
2

No not really. I said either/or for my statement so if it doesn’t go the complete anti draft route, since taxes pays for the willing participants of the military, it would just be a function of allocating money to fund drafties in the same way that the GI bill funds military education. That way, people would be compensated and both men and women would have incentive to not fight against the draft.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:29 PM
2

There’s plenty of anti draft men out there. Even on men’s rights. I don’t think you get what I’m saying. I’m not saying that women shouldn’t be a part of the draft. I’m saying that the common consensus is that the draft is disliked by both genders so we should be fighting for either a better system for procuring willing participants or it shouldn’t exist. 🤷🏾‍♀️ equality can be achieved by both ways
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:24 PM
3

You didn’t address my point. If equality is equal responsibility, then shouldn’t men stop fighting to not be a part of the draft?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:17 PM
3

I’m not insulting you, so you shouldn’t be insulting me. It doesn’t do anything for your argument. Just because it has to be done doesn’t mean it should be. If you’re saying that in order for women to desire true equality, they have to desire to be a part of something that people are fighting to get out of. It makes no sense. If half the population is required to eat a shit sandwich, then there’s no reason for the other half to fight to eat that shit sandwich. Maybe there would be validity to yo…
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:09 PM
0

Okay that’s fair 💀
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:57 PM
1

Actually during ww1 and ww2 the general population wasn’t capable of fighting in war. The minimum accepted height and weight for soldiers in both of those wars were 5’4 and 110 pounds, there weren’t any mental health screenings, even people with severe learning disabilities were drafted, overweight soldiers were drafted, during ww2 the untreated gout and type 1 and 2 diabetes epidemic was at its highest because insulin PCR wasn’t invented until the late sixties and both those generations that fo…
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:57 PM
1

Men shouldn’t be forced though. There’s a lot of men that aren’t capable enough for war. The general population of any gender is not capable of fighting in a war. Again, just because something is a reality doesn’t mean it should be. Women already fought to be a part of the military, but to be a part of something that no one is ready for isn’t something that people should fight for.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:46 PM
1

It’s really not that hard of a concept to grasp
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:39 PM
1

About this statement. Do you believe that there’s a bottom line of respect that should be had to anyone if they are affording the same respect to you?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:38 PM
1

No one is protesting though? Where are these protests taking place?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:37 PM
-1

Not all feminists believe in the same thing. You can still believe yourself to be capable and strong but not have any desire to fight in a war.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:35 PM
1

Calling women infants and then crying about how much society hates men. It’s only infants that cry all the time bruv
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 06:27 PM
4

That’s an immature response
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 05:46 PM
0

If you think this is such a heavy statement, okay. But I’m pretty sure this subreddit complains about people being too sensitive to jokes all the time.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 05:45 PM
–

Yeah? Man vs Wild Right?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:59 PM
-1

I’m really curious how feminism caused this. Can someone explain?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:56 PM
0

Everyone’s mind is complicated. Varying opinions really wouldn’t exist if this was the case. The collective mind of all women do not change at the same time, but the collective mind of media does change at the same time
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:53 PM
-3

I’m sorry, man, but I really don’t think a social political ideology makes you less or more of something that you are by nature.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:51 PM
0

Yeah you’re right jokes aren’t that serious for people like me
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:46 PM
0

Aight man
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:19 PM
-1

That makes no sense
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:19 PM
-2

The block button is an option and please stop tagging me in your comments if you want me to leave you alone.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:17 PM
-2

Oh I thought I was the only one tbh 💀 he’s so passionate about his dislikeness of feminism it’s kinda wild. I dislike things but not that much
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:16 PM
-2

Well the comments this is linked to was removed by the moderator so I can’t actually see what has been commented. Point is, I didn’t report you, but given that you tend to respond to a lot of my simple statements with insults directed at me or my character that seem like they’re out of nowhere, one of the moderators probably mistook it as harassment. You also tend to tag me in your comments sometimes, call me a bitch, all that type of stuff. I didn’t report you, though.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:13 PM
0

There’s a link to the reported content. Can you send me that link please? Cause if the reported content is a link to a reply on one of my comments then I’d get where you’re coming from. The thing is though, it was probably someone else that reported you cause I really don’t give a shit if you get banned or not. Also, I don’t sell content. No one is giving me money to make content. Idk why that’s hard for you to understand
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:02 PM
-4

He accused me of getting him banned somehow and I’m trying to clear up with his exactly how that happened. All the while he’s making really absurd insults about my character. You can pick a side of whatever but pick the right one 💀
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:59 PM
0

It actually does. At least with the job I have. It took a lot of networking, then an internship, then a brief stent at a mortuary clinic, but through hard work you can utilize any degree. You don’t have to believe my claims but I wasn’t the one that got you banned.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:57 PM
-4

It’s not that serious
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:55 PM
-1

I have a biotechnology degree and I also cook and clean for my boyfriend on a regular basis. Also, I’m a volunteer daycare teacher. Someone’s political view doesn’t make a person who they are
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:52 PM
1

Okay well can you send me that proof? Cause I didn’t report you for anything and I’m kinda confused.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:50 PM
1

Well I didn’t report you. I really don’t care enough about you to report you, so I’m guessing that you either did something else to get banned or someone else reported you. Sorry that happened to you though.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:47 PM
-3

If you can’t take a joke that’s honestly no one’s issue but your own
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:46 PM
0

Good
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:45 PM
0

Also I don’t sell content. You must be mentally retarded or something
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:45 PM
0

I got you banned from where exactly? I didn’t ever report you for anything. This kinda just looks like an attempt at confirming your narrative that all feminists falsely accuse people. You’re some guy on the internet. What could I possibly falsely accuse you of
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:44 PM
-1

I really just wanna know what kind of reality you’re living in where that stuff is true
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:40 PM
-2

Where’s your sources for that information
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:38 PM
-2

How do you reach the level of detachment and from reality where you think this girl is actually serious. Search up her url. It’s a satire account dipstick. Also, the most prevalent consumer of trendy and popular music in this day in age is kids between ages 9-15, not women.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:34 PM
-1

Given that there’s literally no specified gender that this is implying you shouldn’t be biased towards, why is it a bad thing to hang up. Both men and women have gender discrimination
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:31 PM
2

I mean that’s the point though. These signs aren’t gender specific so it’s for both sides. Your statement isn’t a gotcha statement. That’s literally just the intention of the sign.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:30 PM
1

Yeah and you could say that’s the same reasoning people use for calling women pick me’s.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:50 PM
3

Statistically, men cheat more often than women and have more polyamorous relationships than women. I could reference those statistics but I don’t want to risk invalidating your life experiences 💀lmao
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:49 PM
1

It’s not like that in America
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:31 AM
1

The average prostitute in America costs 45 dollars for one encounter which most people can afford. That’s how much I spend in a day on gas. Anyway, you could either accept verified facts or shove your opinion up yours 🤷🏾‍♀️ your prerogative.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:17 AM
1

Yeah and I’m saying that most prostitutes aren’t enjoying of that lifestyle and a lot of them cannot get by in a standard 9-5. I don’t know if you know this but minimum wage in America which is probably what you would be stuck with with no job experience and no education is not even enough to make rent for a cheap apartment. The job market is really fucked even for people with a master’s degree. My boyfriend has a master’s degree and had to come into the job he has because of connections. You co…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:14 AM
1

https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/men-who-buy-sex-have-much-in-common-with-sexually-coercive-men also if you don’t believe me here’s another study conducted by an accredited IVY league university
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:04 AM
1

This was a study and it’s made by an approved primary news outlet that has a chain of command consisting of both men and women
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 05:01 AM
1

https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2010/jan/15/why-men-use-prostitutes
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:57 AM
1

Yeah and prostitutes need to make money. It’s virtually almost nobody’s first choice, just like how dealing drugs is no one’s first choice. You’re making the assumption that all prostitutes are just women that wanna have reckless sex with random strangers and get paid for it. It’s a last resort for both parties involved. Do you know how many underaged prostitutes there are? A lot of them are runaways and missing persons. You don’t do that type of stuff when your life is going well.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:55 AM
1

Most people who purchase the service of prostitutes do it because over indulgence.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:47 AM
1

I mean the argument you could make if prostitutes don’t need to be prostitutes to make money, you could just tell this guy that he doesn’t need to have sex to get off. Jerking off is a thing 🤷🏾‍♀️ self control is also a thing.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:15 AM
1

Okay then this guy doesn’t need to get a prostitute. He can try regular hookup sites, take better photos so maybe he seems more visually appealing and more charismatic. Also if you really think a 9-5 job with no education or previous work experience is going to pay for a comfortable lifestyle, you are deeply ill informed. Also, chances are many women do not have someone to look after their kids for prolonged periods of time especially if they are on drugs. Also, prostitution in America is a lot …
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:13 AM
1

Not really most prostitutes have a history of being trafficked, have children they are trying to take care of, struggling with drug addiction, or would be homeless without it.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:32 PM
1

So, then the person purchasing a prostitute would be adding to the collection. You can’t dispel a behavior but support people feeding into it. Besides, there are plenty of recurring customers of prostitutes. Many of those recurring customers consist of married men, sex addicts, and people that want to reenact concerning/objectively gross scenarios. But I guess getting back to the question, how can you dispel a behavior but not dispel someone who is feeding it?
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 11:08 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/sdnxar/what_is_the_point_of_dating_currently/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf This is the post I was talking about
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 10:51 PM
1

You never were able to tell me how those were two different things
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 10:50 PM
1

Addressing your points from bottom to top, I’ve seen men call other men simps for having different opinions, not really women calling them simps. I’m glad you agree with me on that statement. With your third statement from the bottom, ngl I kinda assumed you were a guy because most people on here are so all apologies for that, but I’ve seen a fair share of anti feminist women making claims of that caliber in a few different comment sections and I think it’s statements like that, that make femini…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 10:46 PM
0

The thing is, people on this sub don’t call out people who are being misogynistic. There was an entire post about how a guy wants to get a prostitute because he has no luck with girls and people on the comment section we’re saying how it’s okay to buy a prostitute but it’s not okay to be one. There’s also been a multitude of posts on here saying that men don’t have to be monogamous but women do and those aren’t really shot down. People either don’t interact with them or sometimes they support it…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 10:03 PM
-7

If you want to believe that all feminists are like that, that’s your prerogative. But if I’m being 100% real, men on here have done that same thing. One even said that he was going to make me his bitch if it came down to it. Whatever tf that means. Point is I’m not going to say that all men’s rights activists are insolent weirdos just because the actions of a few. Anyway both parties do it is what I’m getting at. But I think you misinterpret what a pick me means. A pick me is basically saying th…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:35 PM
1

If you want to believe that all feminists are like that, that’s your prerogative. But if I’m being 100% real, men on here have done that same thing. One even said that he was going to make me his bitch if it came down to it. Whatever tf that means. Point is I’m not going to say that all men’s rights activists are insolent weirdos just because the actions of a few. Anyway both parties do it is what I’m getting at. But I think you misinterpret what a pick me means. A pick me is basically saying th…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:35 PM
-7

Alright people post things on anti feminist for validation by that logic, or maybe just like any social issue based group they post it to put their opinion out there and see if other people agree/what other people’s take on it is.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:17 PM
-17

I’m a feminist and that’s not really true, you’ve just been on the internet too long
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:07 PM
3

If you don’t like something then maybe you should try and fix it not bring anyone else down to your level
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 09:04 PM
1

Most people would rather avoid war and violence at all cost. More power to you if you take that perspective but most people don’t work like that. That’s why it’s a completely rational thing that people don’t want to be a part of the draft. Women, men, feminists, men’s rights activists. It doesn’t matter who, if you were to ask any group to take up arms if they weren’t being directly threatened, most people would not.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:50 PM
2

Yeah probably because it’s illegal to reject a draft order. No one actually wants to go to war
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:04 PM
1

It is about equality but last time I checked no one is advocating to make men go to war either. I admit, there’s a lot of men’s issues that feminism doesn’t address, but that’s probably because it’s focused primarily on issues that women experience, just like how men’s rights is focused on the issues that men primarily experience just like how Black Lives Matter is focused on issues black people experience. All of these social movements focus on specific groups but each of them have the primary …
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 01:25 AM
1

Yeah and that sucks. It’s really shitty. No body is going to fight to take part in something as shorty as that cause that’s really fucking dumb. Women already fought to become a part of paid and voluntary combat, but no one wants to be a part of it when it’s involuntary. Don’t know why you seem to think they do.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:59 AM
1

They aren’t fighting for the draft cause men also don’t want to be in the draft 🤷🏾‍♀️ if you’re so convinced that men are cool with being a part of it, consult some statistics and get back with me
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:55 AM
2

Bro this is a reality show 😭 oh my fucking god. They did this to improve tv ratings. Are you telling me you’re actually believing in a reality show?! Please out of all the dumbass arguments I’ve come across on this subreddit this one is probably the most retarded. Bruh, it’s a reality show, it’s staged in the favor of who the audience wants to win. 😭
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:52 AM
1

They’re actually not, they’re being forced to by law. And rejecting it is punishable up to federal prison. I’m pretty sure anyone “when push comes to shove” is going to try and defend what they care about, but no one wants to be drafted which is actually still something you have yet to come up with statistical evidence for. I already answered your question. They aren’t fighting for the issue because the draft is fucking dumb and no one wants to be a part of it.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:46 AM
1

That’s not what I said. I just simply said that no one is okay with themselves dying. I also said “cause no one wants to die” but you don’t want to pay attention to that part do you? Read harder. Reading is fundamental. Besides even if I do go with the narrative that feminists want men to die in a war, according to you, they’re okay with that, more than happy to in fact. I would just like to confirm that statement by any statistics you have that support the idea that most men are cool with the d…
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:37 AM
0

No I asked you to prove that a majority of them believed in that statement.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:26 AM
1

Because feminists don’t want to die because no one wants to die. Can you give me any statistic about the male approval rate of the draft?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:26 AM
0

I know
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:25 AM
0

Then I’m sorry you’re really fucking retarded
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:21 AM
-1

All this proved was one person made a controversial statement and people agreed with it. And again, made on the internet. But real people have brothers, sons, fathers, boyfriends, friends. No one can actually hate all men
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:21 AM
1

You’re under the impression that most men have family, let along have family they’d die for. The statistic I gave you is proof of that. If you could come up with a statistic that says most men approve of the draft I’d gladly admit my wrong
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:19 AM
1

Wow I can’t believe you read through that whole thing in two minutes. Apparently you didn’t read hard enough
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:17 AM
1

Can you prove to me that they do?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:09 AM
1

https://www.aiesecus.org/blog/feminism-vs-misandry
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 12:09 AM
1

More approving doesn’t mean that the majority of the male population which you were trying to assert. Also, people that join the military get paid to fight so that literally already exists. And women did indeed fight for the right to join the military. Besides, I answered your question. If you didn’t read closely enough, that’s your issue not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 11:55 PM
1

Most feminists don’t actually say that. That’s honestly just evidence that you’re chronically on the internet
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 11:52 PM
-1

Feminists care about men, you’ve just got a warped perspective of the movement. And if feminists are fighting for equality which is something you conceded to believe in by the context of this argument what about fighting for equality = hating men?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:38 PM
1

Because most people don’t want to die. Feminists aren’t going to fight for a chance at dying and not even most men approve of the draft https://news.gallup.com/poll/28642/vast-majority-americans-opposed-reinstituting-military-draft.aspx this is just one of the many statistics that display the magnitude of individuals that do not approve of the draft
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:29 PM
2

Nope there are several posts on r/mensrights about not having a desire to be a part of the draft. Also, there’s an extended history of men claiming to be homosexuals, purposefully injuring themselves, faking health conditions, and going MIA to avoid the draft, avoid combat, or to be dishonorably discharged all throughout history as well. Most people don’t want to have any chance at dying. Feminists do preach that they can do everything men can do but if even men aren’t enjoying some of those obl…
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:19 PM
0

Okay so if you’re saying that no one wants to be a part of the draft, and women want equality and the equality is on the grounds that it has to come with becoming a part of the draft. Would it or would it not look like women wanting to be a part of the draft if they want equality?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:12 PM
2

That’s not what I’m saying and if you’re dense enough to think that’s what I’m saying, that’s not my issue. But you never answered my question nor did you address my other points so I’m going to reiterate them. If women should fight to become a part of the draft, maybe men should stop complaining about being a part of the draft. No one is going to fight for something that no one wants. Isn’t that true?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:09 PM
-1

If you don’t care, why’d you respond in the first place
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:05 PM
2

Yeah people only want anything when it benefits them. If you really want feminists to advocate for being a part of the draft, tell men to stop complaining about being a part of the draft. No one’s going to fight for something that no one wants
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:04 PM
2

So if feminists advocate for becoming a part of the draft then it would kinda look like they want to become a part of the draft.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 10:02 PM
-1

Okay then that’s your issue. “Feminists” are only giving you a hard time cause you believe that to be true and you spend too much time on the internet. If you don’t feel bad if they get the equality they asked for quote end quote, don’t get upset when you get drafted cause remember if you encourage feminists to want to be a part of the draft you want to be a part of it too
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:57 PM
3

If you think it’s retarded that countries abuse the nationalistic tendencies of their citizens as to not solve things with diplomacy and resort to sending unwilling participants that they marked as expendable into a war that could have been avoided, alright sure that’s your prerogative. But if you believe that women should advocate for being a part of the draft then tell men to stop complaining about being a part of the draft, in fact tell them to be excited about it. Can’t expect anyone to foll…
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:55 PM
-2

Okay then, tell women to advocate for being treated by the court system too then or better yet tell them to feel obligated to hold in their emotions too. If your own gender recognizes something as bullshit, you shouldn’t encourage women to advocate for bullshit, you should be telling everyone to advocate for it not to exist.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:50 PM
-5

It kind of is though? If you really want women to start fighting to be a part of the draft then tell men to stop complaining about being a part of the draft. No one wants to die. Everyone is literally on the same page with the fact that the draft sucks, so why would anyone fight to be a part of something that no one actually wants to take responsibility for?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:41 PM
0

Who’s “they”
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:19 PM
2

The video is from a tiktokker that was called out for approaching random generally attractive women and feeding them weird/concerning lines to say to the camera. Plus this genre of “street interviews” is known for being composed of staged controversial statements after the segment got popular six years ago on jimmy Fallon
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:18 PM
2

This is the dumbest line of logic I could have possibly seen. Male artists have plenty of notoriously shitty songs. You’re pretending like Gucci gang never happened. Besides, if you don’t like the lyrics then you’re not part of the market, simple shit. Your opinion does not equal public opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:16 PM
1

Can you give me an example of feminist women that have said it’s different if a woman cheats? People on this subreddit always like to create narratives that don’t exist. You see a woman do something you don’t like and you automatically label her as a feminist. It looks really fucking retarded
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:09 PM
4

That was the most weak retort you could have possibly had
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:08 PM
2

Because men aren’t super stoked about being a part of the draft. Can you give me a good reason why women should fight for something that no one wants to be a part of?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:07 PM
-2

Yeah but you shouldn’t get so mad over someone acting. There’s shitty people that exists everywhere but if you use a staged interview as your example it just makes you look dense
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:06 PM
-1

Not really, humans were made to adapt so society would have found a way with or without men. The only reason why men built everything was because they also built the expectation for women to not innovate and not labor.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:04 PM
1

Maybe if you used your brain you would be able to tell that this is staged but aight
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:01 PM
0

Or these type of tiktok interviews are staged which most of them are. If you can’t see that idk what to tell you g
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 09:00 PM
-5

This statement would really only stand if men were super excited to get drafted. Why would women advocate to do something that men don’t even want to do?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 08:59 PM
1

Anyone can adapt to survival
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 05:36 PM
1

They were fighting for a right to vote because you should be entitled to that as an American. No one wants to die, of course they’re not going to advocate to be a part of the draft
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:59 AM
1

If people that have the responsibilities don’t even want them then why should women advocate for something that no one wants to be a part of
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:57 AM
2

If you want to believe that I’m wrong, that’s your prerogative
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 08:22 PM
1

Okay well what about anti draft men’s rights activists. They don’t want to be a part of war either. Also you asked me a question, so you actually are interested in arguing. If you aren’t don’t ask questions. It’s not complicated. Also these women don’t want to be drafted not because their women but because no one wants to go to war. I also never once implied that people that didn’t want to get drafted were wimps. Besides, more complicated than what? The war that we currently aren’t even in? Nor …
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 07:45 PM
1

Sorry I don’t have any pictures or screenshots from actual historical events dipshit
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 05:44 PM
-2

Yeah I can actually. Back during the Vietnam war and World War Two, there were many men that either purposefully injured themselves, claimed insanity, and even claimed homosexuality in order to avoid the draft or be dishonorably discharged. The thing is, these chicks are cracking jokes about it and those dudes actually acted on it 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 05:14 PM
-1

Number one, you didn’t address any of my points, number two, I’m convinced you can’t read cause this is the third time I’ve said that women were also drafted in the war in Ukraine
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 09:51 PM
0

It’s actually illegal to reject the draft, so they suck it up against their will. Feminists would still have to go to war because it’s illegal to reject the draft and many men who were a part of the draft in ww 2 purposefully injured themselves, claimed they were gay (that’s what it took to be discharged), or went MIA to avoid prosecution for not participating in war, so no, they don’t suck it up, g.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 09:48 PM
1

Okay well then tell anti draft men to stop complaining about it then. Tell them to stop complaining about not wanting to be a part of the draft since you think because it’s one group’s obligation it should be everybody’s. It seems like there’s a significant amount of men that are also bothered by their feelings so tell them to suck it up 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 09:34 PM
2

You can still want equality but not want to participate in bullshit. Again, if women start advocating to sign up for the draft then men should stop complaining about it. To be equal in shitty things is the dumbest argument that could possibly be made. Also, I literally just said that women in Ukraine are a part of the draft. Women may as well also advocate for feeling obligated to hold in their emotions or getting fucked over in court too. Of course people only want equality when it suits them b…
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 09:18 PM
2

So what’s the issue then with these women cracking jokes about not wanting to get drafted?
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 08:32 PM
1

First Women in Ukraine are also being drafted. Secondly, if you believe so strongly that women should advocate for wanting to be in the draft then you should probably tell men to shut up about how much they don’t want to be in the draft.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 08:08 PM
0

Like it’s literally like saying “man I wish that women were also fucked over in court like men so that way no one wins. No! We should be working to get rid of things that short change either party, not being anyone down to the others level.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 07:36 PM
-1

That doesn’t mean that feminists have to advocate to be a part of bullshit rules. Men don’t even want to be a part of bullshit rules. If feminists started advocating to become a part of the draft, that’s essentially signaling to the government that instead of thinking half the population is expendable, now the whole population is. Because of the G.I. Bill, we still have a substantial military. Besides, the draft had tons of ethical issues. Feminists should only advocate to be a part of the draft…
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 07:30 PM
-4

Yeah exactly men don’t want to die either. I’m pretty sure it’s a consensus that even amongst feminists that the draft shouldn’t exists. Women don’t want to die, men don’t want to die, people don’t want to die. It’s funny cause you see disabled people using this same angle on Twitter saying if ww3 breaks out they’re going to just stay home and be crippled despite them being advocates for equal rights for disabled people. Maybe instead of asserting that in order to make women equal to men, they h…
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 06:34 PM
-1

Yeah so do men. You don’t see men being super stoked to participate in mandated war. You’re acting like men want to be drafted, they want to get up and leave too. The draft shouldn’t exist. Simple.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 06:19 PM
-12

Or maybe it’s just a simple fact that no one wants to die
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 06:14 PM
-11

Or maybe it’s because no one wants to go to war. There’s been disabled Twitter users that have used this same format saying “if ww3 breaks out I’m gonna just stay home and be crippled” even though some of these people advocate for the equal treatment of disabled people, no one wants to fucking die smartass
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 06:13 PM
1

Has anyone ever thought they say this because no one wants to die and the draft is stupid? 🧐
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 06:12 PM
2

I would have to disagree with you on that too. Women’s physical ineptitude for combat is kind of an illusion. There were so many underaged, disabled, and overweight people that participated in war in the past and the requirements for the draft in World War Two was that a soldier had to be at least 5’4 and 110 pounds. Given that the survival rates of anyone that would be deemed physically inept only had a .003% margin of error (source: military statistics manual 1992) modern warfare which is sign…
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 09:05 PM
2

I honestly don’t think anyone should be put onto the battlefield against their will, not even men. I genuinely do think that because there aren’t any large scale territory issues or sociopolitical domino effects, any issues could be resolved through diplomacy and not war.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 06:36 PM
1

Oh I see what you’re saying and no I don’t think they’re actually having a discussion. I was just under the impression that right was duetting left
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 10:01 PM
1

That’s not how a tiktok duet works. You still hear the other person you’re duetting. If you didn’t, what would be the point
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 04:50 PM
1

Sure, kid.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:59 PM
1

Didn’t really respond to either of the points I made. If I have shitty grammar and I pointed out three of your grammar mistakes, does that also mean you have shitty grammar? But yeah I’m still waiting to go out for dinner and I’m still passing time talking to you. I’m enjoying myself.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:55 PM
1

Didn’t you say “okay fair enough” when I told you I’m not American? If I suck at grammar and spelling, given that I pointed out three of your mistakes, don’t you also suck at grammar and spelling?
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:49 PM
1

Oh you’re 15. This makes sense now. Anyway, you’re still stuck on the grammar thing? I don’t know why I’ve got to spell it out for you, but English wasn’t my first and neither was it yours. I haven’t got poor grammar, I’ve just got lapses in memory for some basic grammar rules and homophones. It’s really, really not that deep. Let it go.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:45 PM
1

Everything that you’ve told me aligns with the narrative that you hate women. I’m not really triggered, though. This is just a pastime until I’ve got to leave for dinner. If you want to think I’m triggered though, have at it.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:37 PM
1

That’s your prerogative. If you think it’s funny, alright cool. I’m happy to entertain, but if you honestly don’t care then don’t reply. Block me. Idk man. Besides, it’s really not a rant it’s just a statement. I didn’t mean to offend you.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:31 PM
1

If you think I’m not making any valid point, it was probably because you were so hellbent on my spelling errors. You can identify as a woman man or anything in between, but most people don’t have any issues with their biological gender and it seems like you do so for that, sucks to be you ig
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:25 PM
1

I do, that’s why I corrected my mistake. Besides, I thought we reached a consensus given that each of us are foreigners. Why are you still picking at it after saying “fair enough”
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:20 PM
1

So you hate women, got it. Have fun with the self hatred buddy.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:19 PM
1

You really like making assumptions huh? Also, on your comment on r/stupidpol, its “paid” not “payed”
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:18 PM
1

The thing is though, I’m not. My dad is from Cameroon and I grew up trying to learn English but not in an English speaking household. I still make a lot of mistakes even though generally my grammar is okay.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:16 PM
1

Alright if you want to nitpick, on r/astronomy you misspelled potato and race car doesn’t have a dash in between the two words. If you’re going to nitpick spelling and grammar as a testament to my intelligence can you please explain “potatoe” and “race-car”
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:09 PM
1

This news story didn’t take place in Europe.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:07 PM
1

Yeah I did. You just can’t read.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:06 PM
1

I commented my source
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 08:00 PM
1

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-women-and-feminism
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:59 PM
2

If you want to nitpick my spelling though, we can both play at that game. On your comment that you made on r/astronomy, you misspelled potato. Does that make you less intelligent? Also race car isn’t spelled with a dash.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:54 PM
1

I did
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:50 PM
2

It’s a spelling error. It’s really not that deep. If you want to hang your hat on that, that’s your prerogative. Anyway, less than 1/3 of American women claim to be feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:50 PM
1

After I noticed the error, because I notice that people like to use common grammar errors as the backbone for their otherwise stupid arguments, I corrected it before you pointed it out. I’m not trying to sound intelligent, I just used an example you didn’t understand and if you think talking about parallels makes you look smart, thank you ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:46 PM
2

So you’re making an ill informed assumption based on statistics that aren’t even true. So, if your automatic assumption is that most women are feminists, you still hate most women then. I’m sorry but this is the most retarded line of logic I’ve ever witness on this subreddit.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:41 PM
1

Okay just because western white women can make money from sexual content doesn’t make them privileged. Western white men can make money selling drugs, does that make them privileged? Sex work is often times a last resort for people and chances are if their doing sex work to pay the bills, their life isn’t going well. Privilege is relative to the individual.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:35 PM
1

Yeah so how is that not hating on women? Those other women are just competitors not feminists and if your only reason behind getting satisfaction behind them being “destroyed” is cause they are women, how is that hating on feminism and not hating on women. Sorry you can’t follow obvious parallels but that’s your damage not mine
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:33 PM
2

You’re being sarcastic for no fucking reason and failed to address any of my points. Fucking swimming isn’t about gender but you brought that into the equation. This is about sport, not about gender. The nature of competition is about the sport in question not about gender dipshit.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 07:21 PM
2

Okay but competition is about the sport itself not who you’re “destroying” like for example back in 1943 when a black Olympian competed against a 400 heat of white Olympians and won he didn’t “destroy white people at their own sport” he destroyed his competitors. By making this person’s victory about gender, you’re not acknowledging competition, you’re acknowledging gender. No, I’m not twelve. Don’t be dense.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 05:38 PM
1

Then why mention “destroying women in their own field.” For what reason do random women who aren’t feminists that want to excel at their sport need to be destroyed?
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/22 02:47 PM
0

I don’t get off in my audios. It’s like reading erotica but it’s with my voice, an audiobook basically. I already have a partner. You and your assumptions. You look really fucking stupid. Keep trying it’s entertaining.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 10:36 PM
0

Besides I never labeled myself as a content creator. I don’t do that shit for a living so stop being so fucking clueless.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 05:57 PM
0

I didn’t say anything about content creators but you would get that if you paid attention to what I said. Reading is fundamental bro you should try it sometime. I’m talking about all of the really retarded sounding generalizations like “oh my god she has a different political view than me she’s probably ugly, fat, angry, blue hair, no boyfriend 😡😡😡😡” people on here do this a lot and it literally makes them look so fucking dense. Like if you get all that shit from texts then you can single handed…
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 05:49 PM
0

You’re not going to do everything right by being hyper present either. Kids go to school and parents go to work for the same duration and often the same portion of the day
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 09:11 AM
1

Isn’t this sub a bunch of people that can’t control their feelings. Like some guy called me sub human cause I’m a feminist. Honestly man, not a valid point.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:58 AM
1

It’s still the most retarded thing I’ve heard someone say on this subreddit
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:50 AM
0

What’s boring and predictable is how much y’all like to make about the lifestyle of a person that you’ve never met before. Aren’t a lot of men on here against making damaging generalizations?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:45 AM
0

You honestly underestimate the capacity of humans if you think that a women can’t be a mother and a working woman with a demanding position. If a woman’s purpose is defined by raising kids more power to them but most women hold purpose in their job and in their passions.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:43 AM
1

Because it was something I disagreed with and I have the capacity to defend my position. Can you answer my question now since I answered yours?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:44 AM
1

Okay if you wanted me to get lost why even respond to begin with. If you had no intention on defending your position, why’d you respond and continue to respond?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:41 AM
1

People on this subreddit will do everything except supporting their own argument. You already took the bait by labeling what I said as a straw man, so what’s wrong with supporting your statement
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:24 AM
1

Well can you give me a reason on why I’m not correct then?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:19 AM
1

So if your statistics are true that women are having more sex than men, who are the women having sex with, if not with men. Cause only 4% of the population has same sex attraction
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:57 AM
1

In what subject did your teacher bring up random sex statistics that given the logistics of, don’t actually make sense
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:55 AM
1

You didn’t answer either of my questions
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:53 AM
1

That’s the most retarded thing I’ve ever heard someone say on this subreddit
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:50 AM
1

Do you have a teacher that’s talking about false sex statistics? In what subject is this?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:49 AM
1

So, if making money from doing sexual acts makes you privileged do you think prostitutes are privileged? Do you think women in countries where sex tourism is common are privileged? An ability to make money off of something like that doesn’t indicate privilege or that you’re being treated as an equal. Wanna know who also made money for being looked at? People in freakshows. Often times they had a disability that made them that way and they weren’t treated as equal members of society cause of that…
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:48 AM
0

Women in Thailand, a place known for treating women poorly, can also make money selling pictures of their ass. Just because they can make money off that doesn’t mean it’s indicative a society that treats them correctly.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:45 AM
1

I just now read your full paragraph. Those are honestly the most dumb fuck statistics I’ve ever read. What source did you get those stats from
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:43 AM
1

If women have more sex than men then who tf are they having sex with bruh? It literally takes two people to fuck
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:40 AM
-4

I like how women on this subreddit claim that they don’t dislike women but then say stuff like this
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 12:38 AM
1

The fact that I’m not even sure if that’s supposed to be a roast or not is indicative of how sad that attempt at a roast actually was
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 06:06 PM
–

If children are on adult platforms, then it’s their parent’s jobs to monitor their activity. So if there is a child on a subreddit that says 18+ it’s really not my fault. Secondly, audio porn and written fantasy falls into the category of erotica. They are words. The issue with visual pornography and the reason why it has different effects is because it creates an unrealistic representation of how sex looks, how women should be, and it encourages objectification. Erotica given that it is entirel…
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 05:15 PM
1

If you can’t distinguish between fantasy and reality, that’s your issue. Also you pretend like the block button isn’t an option. If I piss you off so much do something about it.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 05:09 PM
-1

The thing is, you really can’t tell. She’s acting, cause you know, it’s fake
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 11:18 PM
-4

I like how you’re too dense to realize this is staged
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 09:05 PM
1

I like that I take up so much space in your mind where you feel like you have to tag me in your comments. And I’m explaining for the last time that I don’t sell content. It’s just beginning to feel like you’re really fucking retarded cause I’ve had to repeat that like five times and for the love of god the content I make is for women that have a fantasy involving non-consent. There’s a difference between fantasy and reality. If a writer makes a fantasy novel that has unicorns in it, are they enc…
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 06:56 PM
-1

What
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 03:31 PM
0

This is the most irrational discussion I had on this app. At least most people on here argue with some semblance of logic. Arguing with you is just really sad and unfortunate. Get your last word in or whatever, but I’m actually outta here. Cause wtf.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:58 AM
0

Aight man I really don’t see how a sociopolitical view makes you less than human
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:53 AM
0

Never said you were in middle school, just said your insults sound juvenile like a middle schooler. I really don’t care what you call it over seas. Same principle. Honestly, you do you bruh but something you dislike should never cause you to want to kill people. Even the folks on this subreddit would probably say you’re doing too much.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:50 AM
1

And there’s the middle school edginess I like. Chill man you deadass sound like a school shooter. Anyway, I honestly think you have some personal issues to work out of you go as far as to hate feminists and you want to see them killed. It’s literally a sociopolitical belief. It’s not that deep.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:45 AM
1

Aight fake stats, I’m done here. You’re getting boring on me.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:36 AM
1

Probably cause you made a claim that you can’t support
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 08:34 AM
1

Ten minutes strong with no data ☹️
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:50 AM
1

Okay then really show this idiot who’s boss by giving me the source of your statistics. You would really own the feminist with your undeniable data….y’know if you had any.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:39 AM
1

I looked up your wording and key words for any surveys done on national opinions towards feminism and none of your stats came up. There’s actually nothing stating that there was ever a national survey on the appeal, attractiveness, state of hygiene, or perceived social stance on the subject of feminism. All I found were a few anti feminist podcast creators, a statistic on the amount of republican women that support feminism, and a statistic stating that 30% of Americans over 45 believe that femi…
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:36 AM
1

Those stats are pretty bold where’s the source for them?
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:24 AM
1

Who’s we? Cause I promise you a majority of society either has no opinion on feminism or also defaults to the dictionary definition. Also I like pissing people off into using middle school insults about appearance cause it makes them look dense. Case in point; you my boy ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:20 AM
1

I think you spend a lot of time talking shit too tbh. Anyway, I don’t have to convince people cause the primary consensus is that the dictionary definition of feminism didn’t fall out of the sky.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 07:11 AM
1

I have zero clue if I ever responded to this. Frankly I forgot, but this is seething with unaddressed anger. If you really want me to assume that all men’s rights activists fit the sensationalized stereotypes then boy could I hurt some feelings. I don’t have tumblr but thanks for the offer. Besides, you can still be feminine and a feminist. Just like you don’t have to be masculine to be an MRA. Your grasp of the way that people actually are seems deeply ill informed.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 02:15 AM
1

I literally said to not respond or to block me so I mean yeah… congratulations on getting the point. Anyways as far as feminism goes, the women that do that are misandrists that label themselves as feminists in the same way that trad men or incels label themselves as men’s rights activists. Those guys aren’t men’s rights activists, they’re just assholes. I’m just saying that the actions of a few doesn’t represent the movement. Also, for both of our sakes, in the future drop the condescension. It…
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 02:06 AM
0

Number one, you told me to look for the proof myself so you obviously think that there’s proof for your opinion. Were you asking me to look for something that doesn’t exist since you think asking for proof behind bold statements is such a feminist thing to do. Also sorry you’ve met people you don’t like but In what universe is there people that you meet that you don’t know all that well that talk about gender politics? That’s just not something that happens in everyday human interactions. Also, …
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 01:47 AM
0

You said it was an opinion and that it wasn’t a fact 💀 then you stood by it like it was gospel. Besides, the infantilizing remarks are so boring man. Get a new shtick. You have nothing to add any dimension to what you say other than condescension and opinions. You use the fact that I believe in feminist principles as an insult but you honestly have such a poor grasp on what those principles are that you fail to realize a lot of the stuff you have mentioned I agree with, but I put myself under a …
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 01:20 AM
0

Supporting your own opinions isn’t really anyone else’s job my g. If you living in my head is a fantasy you’ve got then I’m cool with it. Have you got evidence for me seeking your attention or do you want me to try and find that too?☹️
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 01:07 AM
0

I’m not really seeking attention, I’m just here. Besides, if anything is childish it’s probably having opinions that you rely on other people to find evidence for.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 01:02 AM
0

Not really. I just came across your comment and then responded.
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 12:51 AM
-1

I’m not joined up to either of those nor do I plan to but thanks for your offer. I’m just saying that the whole “imma be mean cause they were mean first 🥺” taste of your own medicine bs kinda reflects badly on this sub.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:23 PM
-2

I did
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:17 PM
1

I’m curious as to why
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:11 PM
1

Visual porn has a psychological link to losing interest in your partner, so do some reading before making bold statements. Secondly, you really don’t know what this person looks like so it makes your argument look weak.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:09 PM
0

Everyone on this subreddit also does that
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:06 PM
0

Oh hey you 🙋🏾‍♀️ you’re the girl that wanted me to prove her opinion for her. How’s it hanging
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:05 PM
-3

Comments like these is reflective of the issues that this sub has. How are you going to combat degrading and generalizing statements about men by making degrading and generalizing statements about women? Counter productive
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:05 PM
1

Sup
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:02 PM
1

I don’t think people on this sub realize that the way that men view women often contributes to this narrative as well. There has been so many guys before I found my bf that tried to bribe me with money, gifts, offer to pay my bills, asked almost nothing about my goals, my financial stability, or my career cause all that matters to a lot of men is sex and emotional support. When I didn’t offer neither in the timeframe that they wished those two things to be offered, they would ramp up the materia…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:02 PM
-1

Gender studies is the most rarely majored in subject and less than .000034 (source: 2014 youth Services review) students country wide have that as a major. It’s usually a minor and the major is usually a field like psychology, sociology or journalism. Y’all really like to believe really dumb things about feminism and the assumptions look really dumb.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 09:56 PM
1

Not really
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 09:53 PM
0

Most of the posts on there aren’t about hating men though so either learn what that word means or don’t make claims you can’t support.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:30 PM
0

Okay well you don’t see men’s rights activists making a stance for women to be a part of the draft. Most men’s rights activists are trying to abolish the draft so it’s about what people want in general. Besides, there aren’t any feminists claiming that women shouldn’t be a part of the draft because they are women. Cause guess what? We are in a current state of relative peace to the point where anyone who is currently serving in the military chose to do so, so it’s not even a significant issue to…
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:29 PM
0

Okay so couldn’t you say the the jokes that anti feminists make about women aren’t jokes either
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:26 PM
0

Chill don’t get all emotional on me bruh
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:25 PM
2

I didn’t lose an argument where you completely misinterpreted the purpose of it. I said I didn’t support FDS so why are you still crying about it. The entire point of my argument was just saying that people on this sub and the men’s rights sub cry over jokes too. Now would you please enlighten me on how I lost an argument where you were arguing against an assertion that didn’t exist?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:36 AM
1

Also you want my evidence to be from FDS that’s why I’m not giving evidence. I don’t have evidence from FDS cause I wasn’t talking about FDS when I referred to those jokes
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:18 AM
1

Why are you stuck on thinking I support FDS? Get it through your head, I don’t.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:15 AM
2

Okay number one, you wanted my evidence to be from FDS which is something that you thought I supported but I don’t. I brought up FDS under the impression that it was posted by a troll account, if this subreddit is serious, how come the top posts are internet memes. Also me saying this subreddit doesn’t know how to take a joke was me saying that this subreddit also takes jokes too seriously which is what this original post is claiming that feminists subs do
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:15 AM
1

I think you’re just deeply confused. I’m not defending FDS, I’m just saying this sub doesn’t know how to take a joke either. Then outside of the context of jokes on FDS, I said that there are jokes that people on here get pissed off about. Does that clear up your confusion?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:08 AM
2

Bro I think you misread what I said, me saying something about FDS and me referring to the jokes were not related to one another. I’m not subscribed to FDS. You might be confused, but don’t put that on me.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:03 AM
0

I think you’re confused. I didn’t say these were on FDS. When did I say these were on FDS?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:00 AM
1

I can find several bits and pieces of mensrights supporters being anti women or sexist but I’m not suddenly anti men’s rights
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:58 AM
-1

I like how you assumed that I wouldn’t be able to show you any. Be patient, man. Chill before you start jumping to conclusions
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:55 AM
0

American occupation in Vietnam didn’t “stop communism” and that’s what it’s intention was to do. The conflict wasn’t worth the mental and economic loss. I think we’re losing the point here. All my point is is being against the draft isn’t just a feminist view it’s just a general view. Most people don’t want to be drafted.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:54 AM
-2

There’s jokes about men dying in wars, man and people on this subreddit got upset over them and immediately labeled only as feminists propaganda. There’s honestly no one that has said kill all men unironically cause people have dads and boyfriends and stuff like that. Not saying those jokes are acceptable but neither are the ones that are made about women.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:49 AM
1

Okay so why is it that you’re an anti feminist then if you can’t really surmise anything about what the general movement thinks?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:45 AM
1

And that’s exactly why the all encompassing statement doesn’t work. I could say that a good most of feminists don’t have a stance on the topic of being drafted cause we are in peacetime and it isn’t an immediate issue.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:41 AM
1

Okay do you think all feminists believe that women shouldn’t be drafted and men should?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:38 AM
1

Well that depends on the direction that society is going in. Maybe that would have been true as recent as thirty years ago, but public opinion is the driving factor for who’s strong in society. When people started being socially aware of minority issues, the companies that retained their target market were the ones that also advertised their support for minority issues. Modern survival isn’t about strength, it’s about philosophy and adaptation
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:38 AM
1

I’m just disagreeing with the idea that you think feminists are against drafting simply cause they’re women. That’s all I’m getting at
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:33 AM
4

Okay I decided to look at it a little deeper and you’re right, FDS might not be a troll sub. But as far as taking jokes go, there’s been a few people that took jokes about men dying in wars or men being useless or any other jokes about male gender stereotypes too seriously too. Inarguably, both subs don’t know how to take a joke
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:32 AM
1

What about what I said was wrong?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:29 AM
1

If you are convinced into believing media that seemingly exists solely on the internet, you already had a flimsy character to begin with. Feminists didn’t make you that way. Also, things like pronouns isn’t expressly part of the feminist movement. I think that people that are against the feminist movement are only against it because of the intersectional nature of internet activism. It’s like how Christianity isn’t expressly related to the principles of republicanism but media associations cause…
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:29 AM
0

Well then that’s a justifiable reason. But in most large scale governments, they use nationalism as a means to justify pointless war that could’ve been solved by basic diplomacy. Case in point: Vietnam.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:24 AM
1

It only seems to be men that think that women shouldn’t be drafted. There’s a continuous narrative that implies that women are too weak for war. While they are physically weaker than men that does not mean they are too weak for war. I don’t think that there is any reason why men should be drafted and women shouldn’t. But ideally, no one should be drafted.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:22 AM
1

Can you give me an example of how feminism is turning men into pussies
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:18 AM
-42

I know what the description says but most of the posts on there are troll posts because after a while the subreddit was known for being a joke
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:15 AM
-2

Gladly protecting your country. There’s a lot of people that don’t want to be a part of the draft because they don’t have that much of an adherence to blind nationalism. A willingness to die for your country is an old fashioned view because a lot of times that level of nationalism is unjustified.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:14 AM
1

Okay where can I find this video? Also did she say that she didn’t want to be drafted because she’s a woman or is she saying that she doesn’t want to be drafted cause the draft sucks and nobody actually wants to be a part of it
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:13 AM
1

Simple diplomacy for the first answer which is something that has already been established. Every established government has developed country lines, trade agreements, and nukes so diplomacy is already there because everyone has the power to blow everyone else up. For the second answer, getting rid of the narrative that all men have to be strong, have to be providers, have to do physical labor, and have to not show emotions. Cause some men just aren’t like that by default. Men’s emotions also ne…
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:12 AM
0

Yes you can. Number one, currently we are in relative peacetime, so individuals that are currently fighting are individuals that chose it. The draft isn’t some immediate issue so of course it’s not a big feminist topic right now. Number two, have you genuinely heard women protesting against being drafted or saying they don’t want to be drafted because they are a woman? Cause that isn’t a modern feminist principle
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:07 AM
1

Okay just because by default everything isn’t fair doesn’t mean you should be doing anything to support that lack of fairness. Men have higher suicide rates. Do you hear me saying well that’s the way the cookie crumbles? No, because where there is imbalance is where there’s always a solution to balance the equation
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:04 AM
1

Yes, men should be able to say they don’t want to be drafted and people just shouldn’t fight people regardless of gender
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:02 AM
-3

Yeah well not everyone wants to die
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 02:01 AM
-45

I didn’t say this is FDS, FDS is a satire sub, this sub takes too many jokes seriously.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:59 AM
-5

Women probably don’t support equal rights equal fights or being drafted probably cause nobody wants to be drafted and no one likes getting into fights. It’s not a feminist thing, it’s a human thing. Also, women do deserve as much as men. If we’re in an equal opportunity world there should be equal opportunity.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:58 AM
-50

This entire subreddit takes FDS, a literal satire subreddit seriously
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:54 AM
1

Thanks
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 06:05 AM
3

They’re girls that are attracted to girls
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 12:57 AM
1

That’s not how being a lesbian works
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 12:54 AM
2

Not really. I think I look fine.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 12:46 AM
1

How does my statement reflect insecurity
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 11:24 PM
1

Sorry you’re too lazy to do your reading 😹 okay okay sorry that’s my conclusion. Bye love
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:13 PM
1

That didn’t make sense. Anyway, you’re so fucking boring bruh. This is honestly what happens when you lose an argument, you just want to get the last word in. Sorry the big scary feminazi got the better of you but it’s really sad at this point. Sorry you’re sensitive over who comments under your posts, but just learn to be a little less whiny next time. People are going to say things you don’t like even if what you were trying to say was meant for someone else. Anyway I’m out of here. Get your l…
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:10 PM
1

Point it out then, quote it, you know what you said better than anyone
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:08 PM
2

This is just 😎😎😎😎embarrassing 😎😎😎😎
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:07 PM
2

Where? Why don’t you quote yourself then? Tell me the words you said that made up your defense. Can you remember? Do those supplements actually work?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:06 PM
2

You’re just upset cause you’re losing
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:05 PM
2

But if you’re making an assertion it is your job to defend it
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:05 PM
2

Sorry you think that
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:04 PM
2

It’s the same logic dear
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:04 PM
2

It’s not my work to support your argument
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:03 PM
2

Imagine if you were in court and the prosecution team told the murderer to find evidence against themselves 😭
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:03 PM
2

No evidence type beat 😎
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:02 PM
2

So let me get this straight you want me to find evidence to support how you arrived on your opinion? Oh that doesn’t sound too bright
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:02 PM
2

I recommend a basic MLA format for your arguments, it prevents against evidence lapses like these.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:01 PM
2

You did assume that I was a feminazi which if that’s not what you think of the movement you’re either implying that you think that the entire movement is like that or just the feminists you don’t like. You were steadfast on your delivery though so if someone is consistently asserting they think the sky is green, it’s a valid assumption to make that they think that’s fact, alright then not dog, it’s really killing you to find evidence so I’ll leave you alone
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:00 PM
1

I mean the only evidence you gave was that it was your opinion but you didn’t give context for how that opinion emerged
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:57 PM
1

Okay then don’t. Sorry you’re having trouble coming up with evidence to back your claim. Anti feminists on this subreddit do that all the time though. Get back to me when you find something or don’t.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:56 PM
2

I mean, I just said you seemed confused because you mistook me not caring about who this is addressed to with me not caring about the content of this post. I said you seemed pissed because you insulted my intelligence unprovoked. So far, you’ve said I’m embarrassed, deflecting, contradictory, and angry. I haven’t heard reasoning behind those yet.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:53 PM
1

I mean if proving me wrong matters to you at all then you wouldn’t have issues pointing it out. I mean come on the logic that you’re using is off. It’s like asking someone to find evidence against themselves. I don’t see anywhere where I contradicted myself but you did, so point them out. Or are you too afraid you’ll come up empty handed?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:51 PM
1

Well I have a problem with your post because misandry isn’t a summarize of the feminist movement. I believe in men’s rights just the same but I’m still a feminist, number two I think it was you that referred to confusion as an emotion first when you said I was deflecting. I repeated it, then realized it’s not that, so you should thank me for correcting both of us, also you never said it was an opinion either until just now. Where did I repeat my opinion?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:48 PM
1

Also seems like you did sign up for reading comprehension. You were able surmise that you thought I was angry or embarrassed or deflected by my words. Detecting tone is one of the first things you do in reading comprehension.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:43 PM
2

I mean if you can’t provide evidence you could just say that. Infantilizing my actions is a defense mechanism for a lack of proof. I’m not gonna make fun of you for it. If you make a statement you should be able to support it or else it just looks like “cause I said so 😡” and that adds no validity to anything you say
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:41 PM
2

Well number one, I don’t hate men nor do I think women deserve more rights than men which is I think what is marginally accepted as what a feminazi is. Number two, confusion isn’t an emotion. I think I referred to it as an emotion in a previous response but it’s not. Also deflecting In your opinion doesn’t make it true. Your pointless snarky insults seemed like you were pissed off in my opinion and you said you weren’t so I believe you.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:39 PM
2

How am I contradicting myself? And how does anything I said tell you that I’m deflecting or embarrassed? That’s a question you haven’t answered
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:36 PM
1

I brought up emotions cause you misinterpreted what I meant by I don’t give a shit. I just don’t give a shit that this post wasn’t meant for me, that’s all. And you were all like well you obviously do care. Yeah, no shit, that’s why I replied to begin with. Then I called you confused because you misplaced what I meant by I don’t give a shit. So, how’s that deflecting?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:34 PM
1

Well probably because you have a personal insult without any provocation after I just made a simple statement. See, that’s something called proof behind the claims that you make. You should learn it, love.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:32 PM
3

The fact that you consistently throw insults around that are kind of on the same level of a ninth grader that just discovered Dave chapelle and Adam Sandler and have failed to address any of the points I made just goes to show how empty your argument really is
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:30 PM
1

You’re really not. I didn’t do anything to deviate from the main purpose of what I was saying as a defense mechanism to avoid consequence or being wrong. In fact I’m pretty sure you were the one that got all up in a wad that feminists aren’t allowed to interact with a publicly posted question on a publicly available forum.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:28 PM
2

You think I’m angry? How’d you arrive to that conclusion. Just because you said it really doesn’t make it true. Assumptions assumptions. If it was true you’d probably be able to give some reasoning on how I’m embarrassed and how I’m deflecting also on how I’m angry. Didn’t know texts held that many emotions
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:25 PM
2

I really just want to ask you if you genuinely thought you were using that word correctly
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:22 PM
2

The one thing that people on here like doing is labeling folks that disagree with them as triggered or deflecting or something. I’m sorry but can you tell me how you somehow got embarrassed and deflecting from words? I’m curious. My initial comment wasn’t that deep either so idk what that was meant to prove
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:21 PM
2

Also give me the definition of what you think deflecting means
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:17 PM
3

If you think I was deflecting sure okay. Also apology accepted. Didn’t you just claim I was embarrassed though? You got all that from my words? It’s the internet bruv, it’s not that deep.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:16 PM
1

Okay well never claimed I don’t give a shit about what you posted, that’s why I replied. I just don’t give a shit if this wasn’t addressed to me. I’m not embarrassed, you’re just confused.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:11 PM
0

Not really, maybe feminists on the internet but I honestly think most peoples on this subreddit’s interpretation of feminists is just because they’ve been on their phones too long
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:05 PM
3

What the fuck are you even talking about. I didn’t get upset over what you said about people calling anyone a pick me and that didn’t address a single thing about what I just said
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:03 PM
0

Some guy on here made up a story about getting into an argument with his feminist roommate because she feels entitled to his time and attention and threw things at him and claimed he was oppressing her. I’m what universe is that a real interaction
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:00 PM
2

Ay man I was just saying insulting looks solves nothing about feminism that’s all
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:59 PM
1

Okay then how come there were people supporting this post then
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:58 PM
-2

Okay well anyone can respond so sorry I pissed you off but honestly I don’t give a shit
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:52 PM
2

Alright fine then I guess all men’s rights activists hate women. See how dumb that sounds? There’s a faction of men’s right activists that are incels that so hate women but I don’t judge the whole movement by those folks
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:51 PM
1

okay here’s the thing you thought I made up
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:49 PM
1

Cry about it then
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:46 PM
2

Not all feminists believe in the same thing bruv
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:46 PM
2

How do you know that person is a woman? Proof?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:45 PM
2

Yeah no shit cause this subreddit is dumb as fuck
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:45 PM
1

She’s a lesbian
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:44 PM
1

I am honestly convinced that you don’t know how to read and/or don’t know the definition of hypocrisy. I don’t sell content and I never said anything to contradict myself so there is no hypocrisy
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:44 PM
1

I’m commenting ew over the fact you’re here
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:43 PM
2

So you continue to do that exact same thing? That’s still a high school level emotional argument if you just decide to continue the behavior
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:59 AM
1

Okay lol there’s literally one right here
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:54 AM
0

Also a lot of people that call themselves anti feminists have come on this subreddit to say it seemed like just a pointless circles jerk to keep reflecting the same behaviors y’all hate
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:46 AM
2

Insulting someone’s looks because someone did it first is the definition of high school level emotional arguments
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:45 AM
2

It doesn’t but it does kind of continue to make this subreddit’s intended goal look kinda pointless and ill-intended
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:38 AM
0

https://www.scmp.com/yp/discover/your-voice/opinion/article/3070549/face-should-feminism-focus-more-mens-rights This first tag addresses why feminism should aim to be more focused on men’s rights and how they are intrinsically related https://avikdas.com/2020/11/01/why-mens-health-depends-on-feminism.html This kind of explores why men’s rights and feminism are linked https://www.parkview.com/community/dashboard/debunking-my-favorite-“f-word”-why-feminism-is-important What the aim of feminism is …
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:36 AM
1

This would cause a severe decline in mental health for a lot of people
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:29 AM
1

Two wrongs don’t make a right bruh.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:26 AM
1

Ew
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:25 AM
1

There was a post on here a few weeks ago and it seemed like everybody cared and folks on here threw a shit fit
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:25 AM
1

Wasn’t there also a post on here where there were female “powder rooms” in a mall and a bunch of people in the comments section were pissed off over it? Yeah to answer your question there’s a lot of people on here that have problems with female only spaces.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:23 AM
1

Not really
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:20 AM
1

That’s not making any commentary on the state of feminism. Just kind of makes this subreddit look like a sad little place where people make fun of women that disagree with them or make obviously satirical content like this was.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:19 AM
0

Oh that’s a really weird response
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:17 AM
-2

You’re not even addressing her though so what’s the point
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:14 AM
-9

No thanks ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:13 AM
-10

You really like putting people in a box, huh?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:13 AM
-11

Never labeled anyone as a pick me. Still a feminist, still have a boyfriend that respects me. Your outlook on feminism is so narrow.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:12 AM
-19

Okay yeah and that still didn’t accomplish anything other than making you look just as petty
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:08 AM
-6

And this subreddit is not that?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:04 AM
-31

As in being critical about her looks. Isn’t this supposed to be a subreddit that prides itself on analyzing the shortcomings of feminism. What does commenting about her looks accomplish for that cause
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:03 AM
-28

What did this accomplish
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:00 AM
-5

She’s not attracted to men but you’d probably know that if you did some research and actually looked at her account
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 03:59 AM
-15

I see people on this subreddit do that all the time.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 03:58 AM
1

I honest to god thought you were trolling that’s why I didn’t answer. What specifically about feminism are you wanting to know about?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 03:56 AM
1

Also I’m sorry but it’s a political view. I’m not petty enough to let a political stance pilot my relationships. If that’s what determines your relationships then I honestly feel really bad for anyone that has ever been your romantic partner. Feminism or any social political stance doesn’t come up often in a healthy relationship. That relationship is flimsy as fuck if you think that’s common practice.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:57 PM
1

Literally the running theme in all of these articles state that there are more life and well being demands on women in leadership than there are on men in leadership.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:55 PM
1

Okay then don’t accept it. You just look really stupid. The photos are there. You’re looking at a blue sky and calling it green.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:52 PM
1

Plus I never claimed that you said it was impossible
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:30 PM
1

If you think I’ve lost and you’ve won, that’s your prerogative but you didn’t read any of the sources I gave you that openly state that men in higher positions have higher cases of unhealthy emotional suppression and that suppression does not mean that the emotions are no longer there but you are rooted in such a false mentality that you cannot seem to see that. Besides you never gave proof that women in sweden are more unhappy like you claimed and you never gave proof that women don’t fare bett…
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:27 PM
1

It really doesn’t prove anything other than the fact that you just contradicted earlier statements you made.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:21 PM
1

Oh no insults over the internet from some jackass that think that women can’t function in leadership positions I’m so hurt.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:16 PM
1

And you obviously didn’t read mine, so now we’re at an impasse
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:12 PM
1

“Do I have to get personal with attacking you and your mental illness?” Given that you don’t even know if I have mental illness or not and everything you say would just be a grossly inaccurate assumption, I think it would be pretty funny if you started attacking me for whatever you think I have. Have at it buckaroo.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 01:55 PM
1

I answered both those questions and it’s really not my fault you can’t read harder
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 01:52 PM
1

Then don’t care. You literally don’t have to keep responding. It makes me no different. You can keep throwing insults if it makes you feel superior but it doesn’t accomplish anything. Besides you said some shit about me not possibly having a boyfriend or him not possibly being a real man. Those had no basis other than the fact that I have a social political stance you don’t like. Talk about an ad hominem attack.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 01:51 PM
1

Also if I was a teenage girl it would probably be more acceptable to be on a platform marketed towards young people than a middle aged divorcée that has no other place to assert his opinion other than the internet
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 07:47 AM
1

How am I being hypocritical
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 07:33 AM
1

I’m not a teenager. Also the roles that I indulge are agreed upon by all parties involved so that’s what matters. If you think I have an overinflated view of my importance, that’s fine too. It’s honestly your prerogative to think that. There’s really not anything stopping you. It’s just that everything you’ve said I’ve readily have had proof against but it doesn’t fit whatever judgement you’ve made about me so you’re bothered by it. Sorry you’re running out of patience over some girl on the inte…
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 07:30 AM
1

Not really 🤷🏾‍♀️ and I’m sorry but how does me saying that I follow gender roles indicate hypocrisy. It just kinda looks like you’re running out of words to offend me or something
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 07:18 AM
1

You’re very obviously confused
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:09 AM
1

Yeah and look at him, he’s on an anti feminist subreddit
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:07 AM
1

Yeah I honestly think you’re missing the point if you think a bunch of hype beasts on Instagram is somehow perpetuating the feminist agenda or something.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:06 AM
1

Reverse image search is free my guy
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:04 AM
1

What this post? Yeah it actually comes from an Instagram account run by foreign “investment gurus” that have a lot of clickbaity videos about how to be a man and really shitty investment advice. This post literally has nothing to do with feminism
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 01:59 AM
1

Also if corporate leaders aren’t the front of masculinity then it’s not masculinity that makes a corporate leader, so women are just as capable of being corporate leaders too by that logic. Also, if it’s not world leaders or corporate leaders that aren’t the typical image of masculinity, then masculinity isn’t really important to running the free economic world. And if people in those positions aren’t masculine then where are masculine men leading, nowhere of importance apparently.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:56 PM
0

You have more responsibility as someone that possesses power than you do when you are rising to power. If it’s power that decays a man’s ability to lead then he wasn’t emotionally equipped for the power to begin with, he was just equipped for the rise to it. Also I’m sorry but what does being a CEO or a project manager have anything to do with physical strength? Also suppression still means the emotion is still there, whether or not you express them is what it means to suppress. Have you ever fi…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:49 PM
1

So that supports my entire argument that I made earlier that leaders, the demographic of them mostly being men exhibit a lot of health issues that have to do with their status. A lot of those men didn’t have those health issues before coming into power. Now we have come full circle. You asked for proof that corporate leaders have health issues relating to their management of power and you just said it yourself. Good day.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:31 PM
1

If it doesn’t involve physicality a crippled man is capable of being a leader. Which most instances of leadership that exist in modern times do not require physicality. Why do you think most world leaders are old and overweight
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:26 PM
1

Physical strength literally has no modern application in areas where leaders are needed. There are a lot of male leaders that suppress their emotions too much because of the mentally tolling load that being a leader has by default. Besides, an emotional reaction doesn’t always coincidence with an irrational reaction.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:14 PM
1

Because emotional transparency is viewed more socially acceptable on women than it is on men, but frankly, I know a lot of women raised by single fathers, myself included where emotional suppression is common, so everyone has the same capacity to suppress their emotions, both men and women and if emotional suppression is what it takes to be a leader then both men and women are capable of leading.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:52 PM
1

Also emotional vulnerability is a sign of emotional maturity, so the ability to be upfront with them makes a person a better leader.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:49 PM
1

Exactly so that doesn’t make men nor women better leaders. It makes people that manage, not suppress emotions better leaders.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:47 PM
1

From my article, it says that men can exhibit more intense senses of anger than women which clouds judgement as well.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:40 PM
1

Also the first sentence of the article you referenced literally says Men could be described as more emotional than women, too. It depends on the type of emotion, how it is measured, where it is expressed, and lots of other factors.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:32 PM
1

Most people in power at corporations are men and also that article needs to be supplemented with the other articles for the narrative that I’m asserting to make sense because those articles only address one part of the narrative at once.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:31 PM
1

I’m sorry but that sentence was incomprehensible
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:14 PM
1

I don’t really mind if anyone follows gender roles. It doesn’t bother me. I follow them too but I pick and choose the ones I want to follow. My boyfriend and I always split the bill or take turns paying for things, but I also cook and clean for him 🤷🏾‍♀️ besides I don’t know why you’re sticking by the idea he’s imaginary. I just showed you pictures so cry about it I guess. If you want to believe I’m crumbling too that’s also your prerogative. Given all the pretend narratives you’ve made up about…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:11 PM
1

Yeah sure honestly this just feels like you’re deflecting because your first assertion was disproven. It’s not accomplishing much.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:06 PM
1

Like you literally sound so dumb. You’re headcannoning shit that doesn’t exist because you’re bitter. The reality of the situation is that I have a boyfriend and we’re happy but you can’t accept that answer so in your mind you make up shit like he’s imaginary or trans to give yourself some type of peace of mind. It really doesn’t work and it looks pretty sad on you.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:59 PM
1

Given your comment and post history, I think she would probably have a diagnosis for you too sweetheart. I’ve never seen someone so bitter over other people’s lives. Live your own man. Feminism isn’t stopping you.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:56 PM
1

Also In the definition that you gave me, it also means to restrain. If you put a rabid dog in a cage, it’s restrained and it’s not going to hurt anyone but the dog is still there and still rabid.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:33 PM
1

Super boring response though. Just say a woman broke your heart and now you have unaddressed anger towards women that have command over their own narratives 🙄
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:31 PM
1

https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/mens-health.htm The first source just says that men have higher instances of drinking problems hence higher instances of drinking related violence, depression, and family issues. https://www.headwatersorigins.com/alcoholism-and-addiction-in-corporate-leadership/ This source just talks about high instances of alcoholism is corporate leadership roles https://www.promises.com/addiction-blog/alcoholism-among-executives-and-other-high-earning-achievers/ Instanc…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:30 PM
1

Cool
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:23 PM
1

When you suppress something, the emotions still exist, pushing them down is a form of denying your reactions. Very few people have the ability for complete stoicism. That is very rare in both men and women. And again, male leaders exhibit several outbursts of anger and emotions and resort to unhealthy coping mechanisms because of emotional suppression that’s why alcoholism is more common in men in leadership positions. Also that type of suppression has been linked to brain degenerative condition…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:44 PM
1

I mean he’s cool with the lgbt community but he’s a cis gendered man. He likes stereotypical masculine activities. Weightlifting and video games is what we bonded over tbh.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:40 PM
0

Emotional maturity is about controlling your emotions not suppressing them which is something that neither men nor women have a hold on. In fact the reason why men have higher instances of successful suicides is because they’ve suppressed their emotions all their lives, not managed them. Suppression is not equal to control
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:32 PM
1

No he doesn’t really like makeup and I never wear it. Never learned how to do it.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:24 PM
1

Well I actually go to a therapist already and idk man. Anyway, here’s me and my imaginary boyfriend
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:15 PM
1

Idk man I’m not the one that thinks an entire group is evil and incapable of finding love. Just because you got mommy issues or ex gf issues doesn’t mean other people can’t be happy.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:01 PM
1

Previous definitions didn’t encourage stoicism, they used fear tactics that were meant to scare men into not expressing their emotions in a healthy way.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:22 PM
0

I like how you didn’t mention anything about how anger is an emotional reaction
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:17 PM
1

I just don’t understand why you’re so triggered about it though. On no a guy that respects my political beliefs the horror. Stop being melodramatic. It looks bad on you sweetheart
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:15 PM
1

Okay so why is it an it an invalid theory what evidence do you have to invalidate that theory.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:11 PM
1

That did not address a single thing about my comparative
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:09 PM
1

Yeah but stoicism can only be practiced if you have a good relationship with your emotions which previous definitions of masculinity did not encourage
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:08 PM
1

You honestly don’t have to believe me.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:07 PM
1

Look at GDP per capita. And where is your source on women in Sweden becoming less happy which has a direct correlation to humanitarian issues
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:06 PM
1

No my boyfriend that coincidentally just texted me as I was reading your comment. Sorry you don’t think it’s realistic that a feminist could ever have a boyfriend but honestly that’s your issue not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:04 PM
1

I’m not obsessed, I was just looking for a different comment thread and I forgot what this one was about so I took a look. So chill.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:02 PM
-1

The idea that you think that men that witness war and women that are sexually abused are on different levels, it just goes to show how much you minimize the issue of sexual assault. Any trauma warrants a trauma response, it doesn’t hint to any emotional control or lack thereof. Also, I think a lot of men forget that anger is an emotional reaction and anger and rage is often viewed as the acceptable emotion amongst men. There have literally been men that destroy things, get into fights, punch hol…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:00 PM
1

Besides if you think porn is a valid reason to see a person as an object or less of a human being, then that industry accomplished it’s purpose with you. The general porn industry is trying to get you to see those people in the videos as less than people and pawns for entertainment because there are a lot of people that feed off of the sense of ownership and superiority they feel like they have over individuals in porn. If youre a consumer of porn and you’re fully aware that those people are jus…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:18 AM
1

Are you going to come up with a counterpoint to my comparative?
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:00 AM
1

I’m sorry but there’s also studies to show that men of previous generations before generation x, where suppressing emotions was commonplace, have higher instances of undiagnosed mental illness, generalized anxiety, and depression. Men should have every right to be sensitive or display emotions. In fact, most women aren’t attracted to guys that have little to no sense of emotional transparency that’s why it’s a cinematic and literary trope for a woman to describe her ideal romantic partner has se…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 11:00 AM
1

Yeah but that can be applied to anything that makes the world function. For example, money. It can destroy people that have a lot of it, or it can build people up that have a lot of it. Having a lot of money isn’t inherently evil, it’s how you view yourself in others when you’re in possession of it.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:52 AM
1

Wow that was such an emotional response
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:45 AM
1

If you truly felt that way you wouldn’t be chilling on the device you own, spending your time on subreddits likes these complaining about minuscule issues, nothing is stopping you from going off the grid and truly adopting your thousand year ago life
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:43 AM
1

You only addressed one point that I made. Don’t you think it’s utter bullshit that men’s emotions aren’t nearly as prioritized as they should be because of how people define masculinity
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:41 AM
1

It’s really not that deep. Another person seeing you get off doesn’t decrease the value your ability to produce life. You can still do that no matter how many people you fuck. If the value lies in the ability to create life then the value is still there even if you’re highly sexual or produce sexual content. If sex decreases a person’s overall value than that is kind of implying that the only value you have in others is how many partners they’ve had or if they produce sexual content. If that’s a…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:39 AM
-18

Yeah so something like chivalry shouldn’t be preached if it isn’t going to apply to everyone free of any shallow grounds. True chivalry exists if you respect all women who respect you, not just women you’re attracted to, feel bad for or are in a relationship with.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:32 AM
-1

Those are honestly all concepts that I’ve only seen on the internet and it’s honestly one of the most melodramatic takes I’ve ever heard. Go outside and live a little. You’ll find that previously masculinity was defined as paying for everything, doing manual labor, not being able to show emotions, glamorizing war, and glamorizing violence. The definition of masculinity nor femininity has ever been good because all both the definitions of those has done is put people in a box which is why we have…
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:29 AM
1

Alright well that would have to come with having a non complex moral compass, more of a likeliness of participating in war, limited resources, and a shorter lifespan
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:24 AM
2

Honestly if there wasn’t a part of “natural biology” that was denied, humans wouldn’t evolve. Humans evolved self control, higher thinking, and concepts of self actualization for a reason. It’s human nature to be lazy and selfish but you don’t see people praising or wanting to get back to those behaviors.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 10:15 AM
0

It’s still not your fault for getting robbed. It’s the robbers fault for robbing you. 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:22 AM
-13

Lmao that comeback was a little weak. Try again.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:11 AM
1

Just because someone likes being sexual doesn’t mean they’re an object. If you think a woman is putting a price on herself because of the price she puts on sex, it goes to show you don’t actually know the inherent value of people.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:10 AM
-25

Damn you should probably cry about it then
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:08 AM
-22

Chivalry would maybe be more appealing if it didn’t just apply to women that the individual man is attracted to or feels bad for. I’ve seen the way my friends get treated by men that don’t find them attractive and the baseline for respect isn’t even there
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:08 AM
1

Meaning that of course the amount of attention it gets is low because the demographic of this app as a whole of heterosexual women is low. So proportionally it would make sense
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:06 AM
1

Yeah and what about it? That’s only an example from Reddit, a site that mostly consists of heterosexual men
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:04 AM
-1

Men do not have more of a mental capability to lead. I’m fact, most of the issues that men are claiming to protect women from are caused by other men. Countries with prominent female leads tend to have higher gdp, diplomatic sources, and humanitarian causes.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 09:02 AM
-3

I honestly think people on here love making up stories. I highly doubt that if you did have a disagreement with your flat mate, it had nothing to do with feminism, it was just a disagreement.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:58 AM
1

It still has concerning and gross origins. The only reason why humanity or society has ever progressed is when it becomes the consensus to reject the things that have existed since the dawn of man. Just because it’s old doesn’t mean it’s good.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:56 AM
-11

Not really. My boyfriend, very chivalrous, is smart enough not to take badly reflected internet feminism so seriously that he labels himself an anti feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:55 AM
1

Yeah okay whatever man
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:53 AM
1

Okay I’m sorry but if you really think the majority of the feminist movement is about killing men then you haven’t witnessed a majority of the movement, you’ve just been on your phone too long.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:51 AM
1

I’ve actually seen several comments from this subreddit that were along those lines. Besides not all feminists believe in kill all men
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:47 AM
1

And why do you say that. Evidence?
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:45 AM
1

r/dadbods now go cry about something else
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:39 AM
0

If it upsets you so much date a man then
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:37 AM
1

I wasn’t the one that got angry blocked you, then unblocked you so honestly, you’re looking like the emotional one in this situation buckaroo
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:36 AM
1

It’s a general problem that women deal with creeps on dating apps
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:35 AM
1

Okay yeah and I provided evidence that much of the attention on dating apps is gross and unwanted. Cry about it
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:34 AM
1

I literally only asked one question as a counterpoint so chill. Also the original feminist claim isn’t about less legal rights. It’s an issue of phraseology and that there is a gender disparity in the treatment of legal rights. Also do you mind telling me how asking one question was suddenly me being full of fifty questions
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 11:27 PM
1

He didn’t nail anything. He refused to address my point two times around and you failed to address any of my points as well. I’ve got a question for you then. By this guy’s logic, women’s rights activism is pointless, so what about men’s rights activism?
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 08:36 PM
1

In fact by the logic that this guy is using, then the modern Men’s Rights movement shouldn’t exist either and men’s rights is also important. So what rights do women have that men don’t?
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 08:07 PM
0

I answered his question, not in the way you wanted it answered, but the answer I gave is for some reason something that you can’t handle or choose to be blind to. Again, that’s your issue, not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 08:00 PM
1

I don’t spend 99% of my free time on here
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:57 PM
1

Oh no I’m so hurt
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:57 PM
0

I’m being sarcastic dipshit
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:56 PM
1

Honestly if you can’t read that’s your issue not mine
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:56 PM
1

I answered his question.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:55 PM
1

You legitimately like to ignore every single point I make and only address one. I’m sorry but you posting on a sub full of mostly dudes in response to a photo of a celebrity isn’t constructive criticism. You’re literally helping no one. Also she’s not obese, she’s slightly overweight. Other than your heart having to work slightly harder, it doesn’t have any other repercussions
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:55 PM
1

I never said this sub does
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:51 PM
1

You really don’t know what an echo chamber is and it shows
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:51 PM
0

It’s bad phraseology. Bad phraseology gets popularized then people continue to perpetuate it. The reason why “feminist can’t come up with a list” is because that isn’t the argument. You’re so hopeless
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 09:17 AM
0

The original claim isn’t saying that women have less legal rights though. It’s a fallacy in phrasing, I’m telling you what is meant by that phrase.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 09:04 AM
1

And yes they do. Anyone can intrude into any group with their opinion but what makes an echo chamber is if that opinion or the individual behind that opinion is insulted, berated, shunned, or ostracized for having that opinion
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:46 AM
1

Bro, individual people block people dumbass
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:43 AM
0

Number one, I used to be a junior fitness trainer, still very fit so I’m not projecting on anyone. And number two, her body isn’t a performance for anyone. If she’s happy with it, that’s all that she has to be obligated to. Besides, when you’re just a little bit heavier that doesn’t suddenly make you exhibit 50 million health issues. Also She’s rich and relatively happy so it seems like she’s already reached those goals. Just because she’s not to your standards doesn’t mean she’s unsuccessful
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:42 AM
0

Alright well opinions not being censored doesn’t make it not an echo chamber. Besides, censored doesn’t mean banned because echo chambers exist everywhere in all contexts. It also can mean being berated or blocked for having a different opinion which does happen here.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:34 AM
1

Okay honestly you think I didn’t answer the question because I didn’t give you the answer that you wanted, but this is literally the last time I’m going to try and level with you then dismiss you as a lost cause. 𝐈 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐧 it’s a function of the rights not being equally respected or capitalized on. There are legal disparities for both genders. Hopefully putting it in bold will make it super painstakingly obvious to you.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 07:32 AM
1

At this point I’m thinking you cannot read. I’m not waffling I answered your question. If you can’t read that’s your problem not mine
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:04 AM
1

Yeah and the bar for women when their attractive is low too. That’s humans.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:04 AM
1

My relationship with my father is pretty good actually. Single father, introduced me to the Women of AT&T program, brought me to my first woman’s March. He didn’t support me going to the marines but it’s probably cause he cares about me a lot. Anyway, my relationship with my dad is great thanks for your concern.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:03 AM
-1

I thought a place where common beliefs that coincide and are reinforced by one another is what makes an echo chamber. If it’s about censorship then a children’s show is a fucking echo chamber
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:01 AM
0

Talking about someone’s looks addresses nothing. The way she looks wasn’t caused by feminism, it was caused by years of depression associated with being a child star and now she’s finally comfortable in her own skin. Y’all have a field day misidentifying the root of issues.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 05:59 AM
-14

Yeah what about it
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:38 AM
-2

Yeah I’ve got a lot better to do. That’s just a pastime. Thanks for your concern though.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:34 AM
-1

I honestly don’t know what the fuck you mean by that, but go off.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:19 AM
-7

Oh no I’m so offended
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:17 AM
0

I’m not trying to deflect on anything. Maybe you should try reading my first fucking sentence and stop being dense.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:16 AM
-15

Just because this place doesn’t ban you doesn’t mean it isn’t an echo chamber.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:15 AM
-1

I literally said it’s not a function of having less rights, it’s a function of having less respect. I answered your goddamn question you’re just too dense to read anything past what you want me to think because I fall under the term feminist. There are legal disparities between how men and women are treated in the court system, some favoring men and some favoring women. Get it through your head that the term feminist isn’t some catch all statement.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:13 AM
1

That insult has definitely gone over each and every one of your heads. It’s not creating value around a man’s ability to sleep with women, it’s creating value around how many women validate his actions for being a decent person then in turn want to hookup with him
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:10 AM
2

I find it funny how this comment gets downvoted because she has a solid point on being free from reliance but half the post on this subreddit are about how people on here think that women rely on men too much. I stg this subreddit contradicts itself on a daily.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:07 AM
-1

I haven’t seen anyone respond with that. Y’all really do be getting mad over hypothetical dialogue.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 03:02 AM
-31

Posting stuff like this is just proof that everyone on this forum is sad and has nothing better to do
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:58 AM
1

People on this forum always do this shit, fail to address good points. Looks like you’re no different.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:56 AM
0

Probably if you paid attention to the first comment I posted on this thread and actually made in the very least a half assed attempt to address it, you would see that I did answer the question. Read harder. Reading is fundamental.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:55 AM
0

This post is so cringe
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 01:53 AM
-2

I didn’t dodge a question you never asked me. Besides, I’m not obligated to answer shit if you didn’t address a single one of my points.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 01:38 AM
0

You completely missed the point of what I just said
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 11:24 PM
0

You mean the movement that was started by admiral Charles Penrose Fitzgerald to shame men into going to war? I don’t think he was a suffragette my guy
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 08:01 PM
2

You do realize there’s women in every line of influence. The world would fall apart without either gender
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:52 PM
1

Generalizations are pretty emotional if you ask me buddy
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:43 PM
0

A lot of assumptions there buddy. Me and my boyfriend are pretty happy probably cause he’s not an anti feminist
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:42 PM
0

Just because something is written in law doesn’t mean people always respect those laws. There’s not a fight for equal rights, there’s a fight for equal respect and that’s valid.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:41 PM
1

Sexual attention does not equal good attention in an environment where it’s unwarranted
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:37 PM
0

Those weren’t feminists
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:05 AM
1

Yeah and my argument is that if anyone can be a strategist anyone can win a war
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 07:04 AM
-1

You’re literally on a subreddit where people complain and your statement within itself was a complaint
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 01:41 AM
0

Those schools didn’t have access to conventional academics and were often used by high society women to teach things like manners and housekeeping to young women
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 01:37 AM
0

Stay ignorant
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 12:04 AM
1

Feminists also started the cancel porn movement, the male victims mental health movement and the organization for fatherless boys.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 11:45 PM
1

The only thing I’m taking lessons from is the dictionary and my own life experience not some rando on an echo-chamber ass subreddit
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 11:43 PM
1

What faction of classic feminism mocked men for not wanting to partake in war? Also I never claimed oppression, I claimed nuanced disparities that make the social hierarchy reminiscent of the past. I believe in gender equality because that was the classic definition of feminism and that’s that.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 11:29 PM
1

That logic makes no sense.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:30 PM
1

Who said that we were talking about the beginning phase? Regardless of someone’s level of attractiveness, there should still be some decorum and level of respect that’s showed to them.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:22 PM
0

Wow that was such an emotional reaction to when I had a good point. First of all, never said kill all men nor did I say I supported that. Also, nope also not true. Modern warfare is about tact so a super car and a regular car would have equal chance. The Americans beat the British not because our military was particularly good or even that strong, there was just better tactsmanship. Psychological warfare would be just as important to this “war” as physical would be and according to a lot of peop…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:20 PM
1

Also I’m sorry but why is it the woman’s problem that men are uncomfortable controlling themselves. You should be more ashamed of that.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:13 PM
1

You can stop yourself from “feeling those instincts” because if you have a female friend that you care about and respect those “instincts” aren’t anything. It’s about changing your mindset to fit with the circumstances. Also, I have not once insulted you, so stop with the petty insults. They don’t add any validity to your argument.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:12 PM
1

Because anyone can become a strategist
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:06 PM
1

Well you said that women shouldn’t be surprised if all their male friends just wanna fuck them.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:05 PM
1

Could say the same about you. Literally the entirety of humanity and it’s advancement was built on our abilities to overcome biological purposes so if you feel obligated to your biological purposes you’re just less advanced
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:02 PM
1

Also a lot of modern warfare doesn’t involve a lot of foot travel, not as much as you think. It’s just a lot more crouching and waiting.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 07:00 PM
1

Yeah you are reducing yourself down to something less advanced if you’re talking about biological needs. Men are not animals that have to succumb to instincts or any shit like that. You’re not cavemen so take some goddamn responsibility
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:59 PM
0

Not particularly, that’s where it’s all about form. Even I’m weightlifting, form is more important than strength. As being a woman in the armed forces, we’re trained in how to manipulate our own body weight to better aim a gun so you can work with both speed and accuracy. Also, again, not all armed forces guns are large across the board. Most government issued guns are actually light by design but have a strong recoil. That’s why most of them are interchangeable with sniper weapons and have a st…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:57 PM
1

I’m sorry but if men cannot resist their “biological urges” their reducing themselves down to something that is not advanced enough to be trusted in any positions of power. It’s about self control and if that can’t be practiced because of some bullshit biological nature then may as well be reduced down to everything we are supposed to be “biologically” which means that we would still be in the most rudimentary stage of society.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:51 PM
0

Depends on which guns you train with. Besides, the minimum height and weight to join the armed forces is 5’5 and 130 pounds, so if someone like that can shoot a gun, virtually anyone can.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:46 PM
0

There’s literally no reason for me to lie and also I’ve said it in my comment history too. My recruiting agent is sgt McCoy of the Buford recruitment center in Georgia. Private message me for my actual name and you can find out weather I’m lying or not.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:38 PM
1

Okay well then that means that men should just be held accountable for not controlling their own mindset enough to foster meaningful friendships or even relationships with women
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:36 PM
2

Yeah and this post is criticizing women for complaining when that’s what this subreddit consists of, complaining
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:34 PM
1

If your drive for improvement is something like validation then then that is a flimsy thing to base drive for because validation can leave at any moment. Intrinsic motivation will always be the strongest form of drive. So yeah, my point still stands
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:33 PM
0

I’m literally in the military
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:30 PM
1

That is the most invalid argument I’ve ever seen
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:30 PM
0

Or maybe it’s up to men to hold themselves accountable for brutish behavior. It’s almost like anyone can practice self control. Take accountability for your own behavior
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/22 06:29 PM
0

Isn’t this entire subreddit against generalizing men? So isn’t it a generalization to assume that all your male friends just want sex or a relationship from you? 🤔 hmm
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 03:04 AM
2

Isn’t this entire subreddit just complaining about feminism though
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 02:59 AM
0

If your only reason to improve is for validation from women, then that mindset needs to improve itself before you actually make any changes worth mentioning
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 02:55 AM
0

No you really don’t
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 02:53 AM
1

War isn’t about brute strength or endurance anymore though. You’re dumbing down warfare off you think that’s what it comes down to. It is about tact.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 02:53 AM
1

I’m not reading that whole thing. I’m a modern context an entire war can be carried out without a single individual stepping foot on a physical battlefield which, again in modern contexts would be the most likely event.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 02:51 AM
2

No, Darth Callidous brought up a war, I did not. But war isn’t just about man power, there’s technological warfare, psychological, and communications. If you’re talking about brute force then sure, but if you’re talking about other war tactics, then no. Everyone is capable of using means of biological and psychological warfare. Which in a lot of instances have won battles more effectively. For example, Americans would not have won the war with the British if not for psychological warfare. Brute …
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 07:00 PM
0

Sorry you can’t read that well
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:45 PM
0

War is not even about hierarchy nor strength nor willingness to hold a gun. It’s about tact which is something that both men and women are capable of doing. Besides, most modern men aren’t comfortable in military setting either. They do it for the G.I. Bill. Quantity does not mean mental aptitude for combat. You’re forgetting that the military we do have is currently involved in more peacetime and diplomatic operations. Besides, I’m sorry but this conversation is really fucking dumb. No one is g…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:42 PM
-1

I already answered your question. If you didn’t understand my answer that’s on you
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:36 PM
0

I just commented under a post. Didn’t know it was by you. Also, I do remember you tagging me in one of your comments so 🤷🏾‍♀️ if you won’t leave it alone I won’t either
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:29 PM
-3

Number one it doesn’t take brute strength to shoot a gun number two my major was biotechnology so I would think so
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 06:27 PM
1

There’s a few things wrong with this assessment. Number one, what age group does it take into account? Because most young people that go after young people are not going to find “the top 10%” financially because they’re all in college. That brings up the other issue, being in the top 10% is a relative term. Top 10% of looks? Top 10 of money? Top 10 intelligence? Also because of how relative this criteria is, also taken into account needs to be the area that women are in. The top 10% for whatever…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:35 PM
-1

It’s almost like it’s a joke or something
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:00 PM
-3

Not really
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:58 PM
0

Lmao if you say so, but what does that say about the maturity of someone who’s continuously fighting with someone they called a retarded five year old. You wouldn’t argue with a retarded five year old in real life would you?
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:46 PM
1

Y’all do realize that the male rates for each of these is also increasing at similar rates. Even the site where this infographic is from referenced confounding variables because as a whole everyone is getting more depressed, promiscuous, and divorce happens more often because as a society, religion isn’t having as big of an influence and social media is.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:44 PM
0

Sure yeah I’m five. But you are the guy that used retard as a legitimate insult so check your maturity before you come after someone else’s
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:38 PM
1

I don’t think that any feminists are refusing to want to be drafted though. It’s not even something that’s acknowledged in feminist circles cause our social context is so divorced from war I that it doesn’t seem relevant.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:38 PM
0

Do you think sex and love are the same thing?
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:36 PM
0

These statistics don’t actually prove that sex and love are the same
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:35 PM
0

You must be a disappointment to a lot of people huh
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:34 PM
1

Okay then that should be more of a motivation to either improve yourselves or seek women that value other things than status.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:34 PM
1

So it’s okay to feed into something that you openly dislike? How is it different?
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:32 PM
1

It’s clear that you don’t like my opinion so don’t respond
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:31 PM
0

Not really. Basic body language is a thing. I don’t watch a lot of fights. But I can tell the difference between what comforting someone looks like and what holding someone back looks like. I think you meant that as a dig at me somehow but it just looked stupid.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:30 PM
0

Nah you first
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:27 PM
1

What the fuck are y’all talking about
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:27 PM
1

Okay and if more women are saying yes that means more men are propositioning. Again, it takes two people to fuck
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:26 PM
0

Making assumptions looks stupid on you. Try again.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:25 PM
0

Probably because I know better than to take a satire subreddit seriously
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 04:24 PM
0

Lmao 😭 using political stances as an insult. Not very smart sounding.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:41 PM
1

Kinky
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:40 PM
1

Tough titty
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:35 PM
1

Sorry you’re hurt
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:33 PM
0

Yes
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:14 PM
-4

No as in all your buzzwords and assuming all women are narcissistic
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 10:11 PM
-19

My point is that if the behavior is acknowledged in one party than it should be equally acknowledged in the other
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:55 PM
-1

Men: not all men Also men: this meme format
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:51 PM
-1

Nope
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:45 PM
1

This is literally a link post. Not that serious.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:43 PM
0

Sex and love are different bro
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:40 PM
-2

Can’t hide your racism or sexism can you?
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:29 PM
-1

Ah yes In a very hypothetical scenario as a very obvious religious parent she would react completely differently if she had a girl 🙄 some of y’all really don’t think before you comment do you?
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:28 PM
-2

That’s really fucking stupid
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:26 PM
0

You do realize that pretty much everyone is against wanting to be drafted. No one ever wants to be drafted. War isn’t glamorized. It’s not a feminist thing, it’s just a people thing.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:25 PM
-39

Okay so that means make promiscuity has gone up too. Whoop whoop. It takes two people to fuck 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:21 PM
1

Yeah it does. Some redditors are against women doing sex work and they are all over this subreddit but no where to be found in this comment section.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:18 PM
1

I made a statement that from the beginning wasn’t about you. I said “a lot of people on this subreddit dispel sex work but are defending it on this guy” I wasn’t talking about you to begin with and the statement I was making wasn’t a generalization so chill.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:16 PM
0

Okay well the point I’m making is about people on this subreddit crying over women that do sex work but not holding this guy accountable for feeding into it. If it doesn’t apply to you don’t respond
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 06:01 PM
-1

Okay so if this guy isn’t gross for purchasing pussy, women that sell it aren’t gross either 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 05:54 PM
0

Why are you trying so hard to defend this. Just because a guy had no luck getting pussy it’s okay to purchase it now? Is that behavior just not deplorable cause he’s desperate? Boo fucking hoo.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 05:52 PM
1

So? If people are going to dispel the behavior in women they should be just as adamant in shutting down men that feed into it. I really don’t give a shit if he was unlucky with dating. You see no one jumping down his throat and holding him accountable to feeding into the shit y’all hate. This subreddit is one sided so don’t pretend it isn’t.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 03:31 PM
-1

Yeah no shit.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 03:26 PM
-2

Bro have you never seen a fight. Number one I’m not defending the chick but y’all want to imagine issues where there’s not. The girl is not comforting her, she’s trying to talk her down from going after the dude. Grabbing her shoulders, making her stand a physical distance away from the guy, trying to block her view from the guy? That’s literally someone that’s trying to stop the fight. Again, you’ve never seen a fight and it shows.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 12:34 AM
1

I think this post was banned for implying violence, not necessarily for the message. You made this statement not because equal rights was at the forefront of your mind but because you had something to prove. You wanted this to be a “gotcha” for feminists. It’s really not though cause notice how none of the posts on there is saying that women should hit men like at all. No one should be hitting each other.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:47 PM
1

Okay, bumble is a dating app. I was just suggesting a solution to a problem you were having.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:28 PM
0

Nope you really didn’t. You said that women get more attention on dating apps and I said that that attention isn’t positive because it’s superficial and then none of the points you made addressed that
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:28 PM
2

Why do you think there’s dad bods and teddy bear bods?
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:26 PM
1

Didn’t you pull a straw man in one of the other threads? You mentioned social issues that weren’t even the main premise of your original comment. Also, I haven’t once insulted you. Mindless insults make your argument look invalid.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:26 PM
1

You literally did not address any of the points I made.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:24 PM
1

The fact that fat men aren’t getting as much praise on only fans from women because women don’t really pay for porn. So, fat men do get attention, just from other men.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:23 PM
2

Yeah and? If you’re complaining about your experience, do something about it. Get on bumble.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:19 PM
-4

No shit
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:19 PM
-9

Trust me, the “privilege” that I have as a woman doesn’t translate in the spaces where it actually matters. The “privilege” that women have is almost entirely superficial so it cheapens the idea of this being privilege at all. For example, if we are going with the premise that women get paid just for looking pretty, that just cheapens their depth of character. Several times have men messaged me talking about how beautiful and amazing I look and were absolutely incompetent when I tried to talk ab…
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:19 PM
-2

This subreddit is an echo chamber. If you don’t get that, that’s on you.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:15 PM
0

I literally said women didn’t but men do to other men. Read closer, buddy. Also, that’s the entire premise of bumble. If that’s a complaint of yours, just get on there.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:15 PM
-7

Okay and isn’t that the men who send money’s fault not a woman’s fault for just existing on social media. Maybe you should be criticizing them instead.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:13 PM
-1

Yes they are my g, but there’s more luck on tiktok. Also, It’s just a little known fact that women don’t really pay for porn as much as men do. Dad bods get attention from women but pay from men 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:12 PM
0

People in the comment section are encouraging prostitution, but given a few posts on this subreddit, it seems like something on this subreddit that people on here dispel. Where are all of those anti-only fans, anti sex work people now?
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:11 PM
1

I’m sorry but what male spaces are being invaded by women?
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:08 PM
-4

No, she went to stop the girl from going back to hit the guy again. Some of y’all really don’t know how to read body language fr.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:05 PM
-2

There are plenty of women that like dad bods and teddy bear bodies. Why do you think there’s a name for both those? Also subreddits where they are exemplified. Look it up.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:03 PM
-5

Some of y’all have never heard of the dad bod craze and it shows
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:01 PM
-13

Okay and how is that women’s fault? Statistically, women just don’t consume as much porn as men hence why gay men will subscribe to fat men’s only fans.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 07:00 PM
1

Most of the compliments I get are from other women. Honestly there’s a weird disparity in how much men think they’re “allowed” to compliment each other.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 06:59 PM
-9

This entire subreddit is literally an echo chamber . That’s the point of this subreddit 💀
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 06:58 PM
1

Good thing I didn’t ask
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 01:48 AM
-2

I’m not promoting anything. If a fantasy author writes a book about unicorns, is that author promoting people to believe in unicorns? Also, I’m not threatening anyone, so I don’t know where you’re getting that from. Also, yeah there are a lot of women that indulge in that fantasy. I do not speak for all feminists nor did I say it was wrong for people to have that fantasy so I’m not contradicting myself, you just think that all feminists think the same things which is not true. There are some fem…
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 07:21 PM
-1

Fantasy and real life have a solid line between them. If you can’t make that distinction, that’s really not any issue but your own. Besides how many times do I have to tell you that I do not sell the content I make. I am not making money off of it. If you are too dense to get that, again, your issue, but I will capitalize on this one more time. I’m not selling content.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 07:12 PM
1

Do you are dumb huh? I literally said that I do not sell content. The content on my page is not for sell. Do you not know how to read?
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 07:06 PM
1

I don’t sell content. The content I post is for women. Are you dumb or stupid?
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 07:02 PM
-1

Honestly, cry about it lol
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 06:58 PM
1

When I said that this post is pointless cause it’s a thoughtless pissing contest between who has it worse, you stressed that I shouldn’t have used has and I should have used had instead as some sort of way of invalidating the point I’m making, so then when I say this post is irrelevant since the issues of man and woman are past tense to you, you’re saying now that “history is a subject” okay so if this “historical” post is relevant on a forum that talks about present issues with feminism, why is…
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 03:52 PM
1

You were the one that stressed “had” not me
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 11:21 AM
0

Which commenters are that. Please, point them out for me. Most of my commenters have zero content. Also, no it really couldn’t have been said by any porn star cause you could probably tell if someone was rubbing lotion on a piece of rubber in any pornographic video. Besides I’m pretty sure the content I create had no significance to the post we were originally arguing about so you were the one to introduce third party topics not me. I don’t support visual pornography. Simple shit. Just because I…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 10:21 PM
1

Number one I just said I wasn’t making money off of it. Number two, okay? You decide to smoke weed in your free time which for me personally, also has ethical issues. Media glamorizes and encourages that but it’s not inherently good either. Also I’m not getting of in my audios, the sounds are just me rubbing lotion on a piece of rubber 💀 so yeah, it’s actually acting.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 09:01 PM
1

Also yeah I never said I minded being sexualized in the context of sexual content, but to be sexualized on any other forum, anywhere else is unacceptable. We had this conversation.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 08:15 PM
1

It doesn’t bring me money, popularity, or attention. It’s literally just acting. The shit I say in the comments is a character for fantasy. Besides, I do also remember you agreeing that regardless of if people make sexual content or not, you should view them as less of a person. So, why are you trying to use cheap insults and low blows? I have a career, a boyfriend, and a degree. I don’t have the need for attention, money, or whatever the fuck you just said. And I still don’t support onlyfans ca…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 08:13 PM
-2

Okay so if you’re agreeing that men get more promotions then you’re agreeing that wage gap exist. Also, one of the feminist pushes is to get more women in stem. Also the “feminist propaganda” you think exist with those companies is legitimately just a publicity thing, the inner workings of those companies don’t actually practice what they preach.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 08:08 PM
-1

I just answered your question. This debate was fun but honestly, I only speak English and Spanish and English doesn’t seem to be your strongest.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:16 PM
0

Also I said shut the fuck up not fuck off. I said that because you said it to me first? So if saying that means that I didn’t have an argument, that means neither did you?
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:14 PM
0

Okay I’m sorry I don’t think I can have this argument with someone who is not a native English speaker. I answered your question three times. Wage gap exists because women don’t get as many promotions, men get more promotions even if they are doing the same amount of work. The reason why companies don’t higher more women is they still need people to occupy promoted positions. Did I dumb my answer down enough for you? If you don’t understand that answer, you’re a lost cause.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:12 PM
0

Also the “female privilege” only exists cause men forced other men to go to war. Not my problem that man’s biggest enemy is other man, so just shut the fuck up.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:54 PM
0

It’s unnecessary to you because your logic is flawed and you just want to find a reason to hate feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:53 PM
0

The question you asked doesn’t apply cause the idea that pay gap isn’t caused by disparities in being hired for the same job, but it exists because there is a glass ceiling in the way promotions are handled. Pay gap exists because it is easier for a man to get promoted. Your question is literally dog shit because you don’t have a proper definition of what pay gap is.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:52 PM
0

Also I’m sorry man but you commenting pro male memes or whatever just kinda makes you look a little dense.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:37 PM
0

Okay I’m just going to paste my entire response again. If you don’t have the capacity to read the whole thing. That’s your issue, not mine. I like how you’re arguing against assertions that haven’t even been made yet. Insulting people based on things they haven’t even said is such a weak strategy. It doesn’t really work. I haven’t used the word propaganda unless talking about World War Two in a APUSH essay, so come off it. Also, I literally have not shamed men at all. I’ve got two really importa…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:35 PM
1

And? Number one, they still retain a good bit of sensitivity and number two the chance of them catching and spreading infection increases ten fold when they still posses that piece of skin. You’re trying to make the assertions that I do not know enough about the topic to have an opinion, but this is a topic that is still up for scientific debate. There are doctors arguing both sides between the medical vs moral implications of this.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:22 PM
0

To answer your question about wage gap, I did answer it but you ignored my answer cause you really can’t face any truth.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:17 PM
0

Also tell me the source where you’re getting those statistics from because those are very much wrong
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:17 PM
0

I don’t sell NSFW content
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:16 PM
1

Aight
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:15 PM
0

No I’m asking why this guy is so upset over an mf on the internet. Also trust me, the issue of infection in that area is common enough to have multiple cases of various infections of the foreskin in the morgue I work at.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:15 PM
1

Okay well you outlined that this was an issue about who had it harder in past tense and if this isn’t a current issue for either of us why does this post presently need to exist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:13 PM
-1

Also, if you look at media there are tons of women obsessed with “dad bods” and skinny skater guys with absolutely no muscle. The disparities in body preferences you think there are is entirely built from what Instagram influencers post about on social media
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:11 PM
-1

I’m in the Marines, so I’ve already joined the military. Thanks for asking. Also, I’m pretty sure it wasn’t feminists that sent men to die in wars, it was other men that did that, so your issue should be with men in government power rather than with feminists that wanted education. Also, I do fight against the sexist norms made for men but I hate to break it to you but most of those norms were made by other men.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:09 PM
-1

Okay but generalizations look stupid for any group of people.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:06 PM
0

I do remember in our argument you apologized for labeling me as an attention whore and then now you’re back at it again? Make up your mind.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:04 PM
-2

Oh you again. Honestly your arguments are so boring and poorly constructed. If you want to believe I’m triggered, you can. Its really not an insult to anything I’m saying. This entire subreddit exists cause people are triggered over feminists. Also, no one “called me out” on the content that I make. If I actually gave a shit and people were actually using it as valid leverage, if probably just use a different account.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:02 PM
-2

Obviously not as ignorant as that guy.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:24 AM
-1

Also in the sentence where you insulted my intelligence, you also said “They are atleast have trillions of brain cells.” There wasn’t a single grammatically correct thing about that sentence. Kinda ironic. So, Check yourself before you wreck yourself, bruh.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:47 AM
-5

I like how you’re arguing against assertions that haven’t even been made yet. Insulting people based on things they haven’t even said is such a weak strategy. It doesn’t really work. I haven’t used the word propaganda unless talking about World War Two in a APUSH essay, so come off it. Also, I literally have not shamed men at all. I’ve got two really important ones in my life at the moment and there’s no reason to shame men as a whole. My own father was the one to get me into feminist ideologies…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:43 AM
0

You’re arguing with me as if I disagree with you in the idea that men have issues, my own dad has been subject to a few of the things you’re talking about. But feminism is still necessary in order to mend the affects of these disparities. There are factions of feminism trained on encouraging women to get into blue collar jobs, encouraging single mothers with sons to take lessons on how to raise a man in a way a man should be raised, but these things are issues created by a long history of women …
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 05:34 AM
0

Well then you’ve gotten a bad impression of the movement because a movement can’t be so disconnected from its origin that it changes definition. Also I agreed with what you said about dispelling those aspects of society, but also women do not have “privilege” in a lot of areas of society. A few last hundred years of activism does not change the damage that hundreds of years have been for women.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:52 AM
-7

You really think you did something with all them internet culture buzz words huh? Propaganda? Really? This isn’t the Cold War. This is Reddit. Honestly, what’s probably more sad is that you somehow feel threatened by your internet oasis being “raided.” It’s the internet, get over yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:31 AM
-6

Did I say that I thought all men are violent? No so that’s a weak argument and neither is that poster saying that. You legitimately think that poster is spreading harmful information by just saying protect women and girls? It’s not saying kill men and boys. You think that by the absence of something, it’s saying something that it’s really not. I stg people on this subreddit are scrounging for shit to complain about
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:22 AM
0

What?
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:13 AM
-8

What? I’m sorry that makes no sense. 💀 the point of mentioning one group of people is to narrow down the set of issues and that groups that are perpetuating them. This ad was probably targeted cause this is a campaign that is geared toward shutting down one group of people. Sometimes generalities on issues, especially issues of this caliber end up very messy. Like is “Breast Cancer awareness” saying “fuck all other cancers. We don’t give a shit.” No because it’s a group with one focus.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:11 AM
1

Good thing I didn’t ask you. Anyway, my point is, given my education in the field, whether or not circumcision is ethical is still a scientific debate. There are doctors who support both sides, so no I’m not uneducated on the subject, this is just a section of human microbiology and ethics that is still being debated.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 03:23 AM
1

My mistake. Point still stands
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 03:17 AM
-14

Y’all post so many things about men being generalized then have dumb shit in your comment history like this
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 03:06 AM
-11

Or maybe the add was just targeting specific rings, groups, and crimes that target women? This could be a “end violence against trans people” or “end violence against Asian people” and it wouldn’t be saying “only this group of people is subject to abuse” it’s just addressing an issue for one set of people. 💀
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:59 AM
-5

Yeah nah not really
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:56 AM
1

Come on man, I’m on Reddit what do you expect.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:55 AM
1

If “you people” means having a degree in biotechnology and background in human microbiology then I’ve gotta tell you, I do know a lot of things. Kind of a little bit morbid and gross but I’ve got a mortuary science certificate and I’m just going to say that uncircumcised old men are among the least pleasant to process. (Excluding severely mangled folks of course)
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:54 AM
1

Oof aight StankbuttInMyOwnButt
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:51 AM
-1

If you think it’s most feminists supporting all of the things you’ve mentioned, you’re probably consuming some of the wrong media. Also, historically, Women didn’t really mention men’s issues cause they were trying to get their own issues in check. You don’t have to be anti feminist in order to dispel the behaviors that you’ve pointed out. I dispel those behaviors because I’m a feminist. A lot of these issues are born out of issues that women have had. Like for example, the winning everything in…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:50 AM
0

Well I mean, as a biotechnology major, working in a field involving human anatomy, I would hope I’d be able to. So to answer your question, yeah I do.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:38 AM
1

So the post doesn’t need to exist 🧍🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:36 AM
0

Well I mean, most men don’t know how it feels either cause the foreskin gets cut off as a newborn. I don’t know about you but folks don’t have memories from then.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 02:35 AM
-2

A lot of men do just fine without it and are pretty damn relieved that they aren’t as likely to get UTIs and genital lice.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:20 AM
-3

Number one, just because they disagree with whatever she is saying doesn’t make them a feminist. Ever thought that maybe it just makes them someone who’s a bad person? Not necessarily belonging to any type of sociopolitical ideology?
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:11 AM
1

Okay so if you’re implying that we have to be mindful of one another’s issues, why does this post need to exist? It’s just some pissing contest on who has it harder.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 09:08 AM
-4

I have a boyfriend 😎 not a femcel.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 06:32 AM
1

If you say so
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:43 AM
1

I’m really trying to humor you but this bit is so overused.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:40 AM
1

Uhuh
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:33 AM
1

If you want to believe that, sure. I write fantasy and I don’t mind if folks indulge in them
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:31 AM
1

Uhuh
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:27 AM
1

Lol okay?
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:24 AM
1

Okay then
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:17 AM
0

Throwing needless insults isn’t very constructive. It just minimizes validity to anything you say. Also, so what if it’s Australia. That literally has no significance to the point.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:17 AM
1

That’s not healthy
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:12 AM
1

You’re welcome. Get a therapist for that next time though.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:11 AM
1

You’re so boring
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:09 AM
-1

Cool lmao still doesn’t stop you from sounding dense.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:03 AM
0

It took like ten seconds on google. Knock yourself out https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/circumcision
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:02 AM
1

Cool
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:49 AM
1

Cool
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:47 AM
1

What
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:46 AM
1

No
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:45 AM
1

You can’t make an intelligent argument against an unintelligent assertion
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:44 AM
1

Boredom
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:43 AM
1

Yeah and most of bacterial build up is positive bacteria called vaginal flora. Also even the negative bacteria that can get built up there wouldn’t be solved by female circumcision.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:43 AM
1

Yeah
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:42 AM
1

I’m good thanks for the offer
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:41 AM
1

In your fantasies, sure.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:39 AM
-6

Doesn’t make it any less sad. Do better 💀
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:39 AM
1

No i didn’t click on your profile at all. I was just scrolling through this subreddit looking for more dumbass comments. Looks like you’ve got a track record
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:37 AM
-7

Lmao that’s such a sad way to respond to criticism
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:36 AM
1

Yeah sure
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:34 AM
1

Oof. No thanks.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:33 AM
-1

I haven’t seen anyone comment that
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:32 AM
1

You have legitimately made this argument boring
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:31 AM
1

Bro, it’s text. The explosion is the equivalent of a match burning out.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:28 AM
-21

Cause it’s fun
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:27 AM
1

Lmao. Okay dude. No one can “explode” over the internet. I just gave you advice. That’s all that was.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:25 AM
1

What? That made zero sense. Nothing stings cause what you said wasn’t a “get back” I didn’t make a single generalization.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:22 AM
1

Ah yes, a vast generalization that never solved anything. Bruv, if all men’s rights activists aren’t incels, not all feminists are monsters. Learn how to differentiate man. It just looks sad.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:18 AM
1

Yeah that’s my whole shtick.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:12 AM
1

Cool 😎
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:10 AM
1

Good for you buddy.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:08 AM
1

Cause that’s a weird thing to be turned on by.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:06 AM
1

That’s such a weird question. No, Hurt Guy, it doesn’t.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:04 AM
1

I’m always in the mood to be anti-anti feminist. Pretty meta if you ask me.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 03:01 AM
1

Eh not really. Depends on my mood.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:58 AM
2

Yuh 😎
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:56 AM
0

Because internet popularity doesn’t mean anything to me. Oh no I’ve been downvoted boohoo. It’s not that serious.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:54 AM
0

This is a public forum so as far as I’m concerned, it is my place.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:52 AM
1

You called me a retard then said what you said was too stupid for a retard so doesn’t that make what you said more retarded?
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:48 AM
1

Hah I saw that comment you deleted 💀 probably realized how stupid it was.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:44 AM
0

Then don’t argue. Nothing’s stopping you from going to bed. Just don’t respond. It’s really not that hard. Also, once again, you thought that was a roast or something. I make fantasy content get over it
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:40 AM
0

Omg what an astute observation. Got anymore to share with the class? Idk if that was supposed to be a burn but it didn’t do much.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:35 AM
-1

I mean. I have my degree in biotechnology. Not in microbiology, but there was a significant amount of prerequisites I had to take on human microbiology and the foreskin is pretty fucking gross. Besides, if I was so uneducated about it, why is there a significant amount of men that support circumcision?
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:34 AM
0

And you didn’t respond to anything else I said, so I’ll answer your question when you have a comprehensive answer
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:28 AM
1

Ah well google is pretty free and you’d probably learn that there are tons of nasty little microbes that live in foreskin. And there’s another documentary on Netflix that links female circumcision to sex trafficking rings. So, educate yourself too buddy 😌 also your responsibility
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:27 AM
0

Okay and people that post and comment on this subreddit have also claimed in linked social media to be incels. Does that mean all men’s rights activists are incels, no. The issue with everyone on this subreddit is they hate the entire movement because of the actions of one faction. I am a feminist but it’s because I believe in equality. Not all feminists believe in the same thing. So just because you saw some post on some subreddit that I’m not a part of, does not mean you can make that assertio…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:26 AM
0

Sounds like something that someone without a counterpoint would say. If you’re so hellbent on me getting educated, why don’t you just drop some knowledge or something
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:10 AM
-1

When did I say that men couldn’t talk about a woman’s body? Don’t put arguments or assertions that haven’t been made yet into the argument. It just makes you look like you’re scrounging for a counterpoint
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 02:09 AM
-2

Why are you full of so much venom? You don’t have to be upset it’s just a conversation. Besides, I’ve got a few sources to show that it’s not rare like you seem to think. I’d like to get a load of your sources too.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:12 AM
-7

You didn’t even respond to anything I said. If you don’t have a counterpoint, just say that.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:04 AM
-29

Nope there are several sources to point to pretty prevalent bacterial build up. Google is free my g.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:03 AM
1

Not really. I think that many feminist are just concerned with the idea that they should not be viewed as less of a woman if they do things or have habits that have been deemed as masculine. Just like the idea that a man shouldn’t be viewed as less of a man if he has habits that are deemed as feminine. Femininity and masculinity should be a choice, not an expectation
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:53 PM
-38

Female circumcision consists of cutting off the female’s clitorus which for most women is where they derive sexual pleasure. The point of circumcision of women especially in a lot of tribes in Africa is centered around the idea that women are not supposed to receive pleasure during sex. The circumcision of men has been common practice in actual hospitals because keeping the foreskin has been linked to several bacterial infections if not taken care of properly. Genital lice, yeast infections, sol…
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:50 PM
0

I’m pretty sure feminists didn’t tell men to go die in wars, that was something that the government does. Y’all are so focused on hating feminists that you fail to see the real enemy.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:42 PM
0

There are so many men that lack these skills too. The post is literally about how both should have these skills. It’s an issue of modern day people not just modern day feminism my g.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:40 PM
-42

There’s a huge difference between male circumcision and female circumcision. If you don’t realize that, then sex education has really failed America
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:36 PM
-15

Not really
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:33 PM
1

Cry about it I really don’t give a shit. I feel sorry for your girlfriend and for fucks sake my friend is wearing a shirt that anyone could get at forever fucking twenty one. Again if you think she looks sexy, tell your girlfriend you’re actually attracted to children and not her sorry ass. All my friends followers are people from my old high school, I’m one of the only adults. She isn’t posting for anyone but her friends you perverted fuckwad. If you have some school girl fantasy, that’s your p…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 01:31 PM
0

First of all learn how to fucking spell profile you uneducated dipshit, second of all I wasn’t going to give a shit until you brought my friend into this. If you view the photo she posted as sexy you’re just as fucked up as any gross 55 year old man. She’s covered. Number two, she blocks anyone who is sexually explicit to her because she was literally abused by her own father. Notice how she doesn’t put hashtags or any other shit? It’s because she doesn’t do this for attention. Get off your high…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 01:03 PM
1

That’s my friend Li. She’s 17. And a lesbian. Keep my friend’s name out of your mouth.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 12:18 PM
1

How?
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 12:11 PM
1

Okay so hiding it or not, by your standards it would be immoral regardless. Your correction was fair but if you’re going to correct me on my terminology then you’d have to dispel your use of most as well which you haven’t. Also now your issue with women on the internet is starting to look very personal. Also, if you think your point doesn’t suit my argument then you just don’t have a grasp of what my argument is. Your issue, not mine. Also, my goal as a feminist isn’t to sleep with good looking …
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 11:39 AM
0

Which one of my comments was anti men? Also, society composed of women would probably have the same merits without as many war born setbacks. Kinda seems like your comments are pretty anti woman. Oof.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 10:35 AM
1

Okay well men stay way longer on PornHub than women and also there are more male patrons of it as well. I’m sorry but I just think you have an unhealthy view of women, the fact that you think most of them just seek attention. If it were true that women spend way more time on social media then that would just support the idea that women dress the way they do on social media for women not really for men. Also again, I think that most feminists just advocate for the idea that sexuality should not e…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 10:31 AM
1

Then maybe you should reconsider the type of company you attract and the type of media you consume. Cause most girls I know like posting aesthetic pictures, reading fantasy books, and supporting whatever causes they like. A lot of the girls I know are in STEM programs just like me and one of the feminists I know is my own father who introduced me and my sister to the Women of AT&T program. Your view of people is negative and limited. I don’t think most men or most women are anything. They are pe…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 10:09 AM
1

You really think it’s “most girls” fine let’s go with that narrative. If it’s “most girls” that show their ass on the internet wouldn’t it be fair to then say that it’s most guys that view that content? That doesn’t make them morally right either does it? There wouldn’t be anything to show if there weren’t any viewers. I’m fact, if you go to the comment sections of women who post that kind of thing, it would be mostly guys, PornHub sections consist of mostly men. So do you equally dispel that ki…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 10:00 AM
1

Cause that’s the only instance where it’s valid on both ends to hit anyone. I’m sorry g, but this isn’t my kind of argument because just don’t hit people. Simple as that. I feel like the oppression equality argument should only really suffice on things that we want to see more of in society like women in blue collar jobs or women in combat. I genuinely think the consensus is that these are necessary. As far as making other stats even by bringing women down, is something that I don’t support such…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:49 AM
1

When did I ever say I hate men? I love my dad and my boyfriend very much thank you for asking 🧍🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:37 AM
1

Most girls don’t. Do most men rape people? No. No they don’t. Also I mean if you’re pulling a direct quote, why don’t you just tell me where? When did you see someone say this? How far do I have to scroll? I’m really not going to scavenger hunt for a comment that may or may not exist. Besides, why tf would I have a second account where anyone of my professors, fellow marines, and coworkers could find it. Second accounts get recommended to whoever follows the primary account dipshit.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:36 AM
1

Well, the original origins of the quote I can admit that I’m not sure of, but upon looking up the quote, it’s found on sites like fivestarman and gentleman quotes weekly, both sites that were published and supported by men worldwide. Maybe all men don’t believe in this quote, but a lot have. Also, in a street fight, everyone makes an effort to separate both people involved regardless of gender? I don’t know what you’re getting at here? The argument that you are making is essentially empty becaus…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:32 AM
0

Also keep in mind that you’re defending what you said in response to a deleted post. I think even the original poster in question saw how stupid it was and you’re over here defending it and everything. That’s embarrassing.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:18 AM
1

Yo you could see the way I look over texts?! You should sell your ability to the government. I could say the same about you though. You got pissy cause women called men rapists but then called women whores. Your defense was that it was significant to the scenario so the generalizations were just, then I just asked you if their generalizations were just given the scenario. Simple question. I wasn’t even preaching anything. Just asking a question.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:15 AM
1

Not really. Never claimed I was a victim. Look at you and your assumptions. Also saying that someone said something isn’t really proof. I just asked you to show me the post then I would believe you. I mean, when I said that I didn’t have ass pics plastered on the internet, I gave you my Instagram. You didn’t take my word without the tangible evidence, so why can’t you afford the same grace to me by just simply linking the post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:10 AM
1

Not really. I fight men hand to hand on a regular basis. It was a part of combat training. I honestly think that most feminists believe that no one should incite violence on anyone, but if it had to happen, then sure I guess. Most feminists aren’t saying beat up men. That’s just not an argument that’s being made cause I believe in equality and no one should lay a hand on anyone. Besides, I’m pretty sure the term that men should never lay a hand on a woman was started by men. I’m not ignoring any…
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 09:07 AM
0

I mean saying I’m triggered doesn’t make you right either. Besides last two arguments we had, you kinda dipped and didn’t have a counter argument. Sorry the way I talk triggers you, my g.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:58 AM
1

I mean you did say that women are attention whores, so guess generalizations don’t feel all that nice. Also kindly direct me to the post it was under. If I may make an assumption (something youre pretty keen on doing) it was probably under a post praising predatory behavior that a guy exhibited. 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:54 AM
1

What does that have to do with anything I said. It’s literally the consensus that people should just not fight anyone. What’s wrong with my statement.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:47 AM
-1

Not really. I do other stuff. This is just a pastime. Thanks for your concern though.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:46 AM
1

That has nothing to do with me literally saying go read my second response.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:44 AM
0

If the movement was always about supremacy, it’s definition would have never contained the word equality. It would have just contained the word supremacy. Also, unless I let come out of my mouth that I think women are oppressed, then I don’t believe they are. If you generalized every group by what a select few believe, you then have a lot of pretty avoidable problems.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 08:43 AM
1

I literally just responded to you. Reading is fundamental. Read my second response or go cry.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 05:48 AM
-1

“Feminists like you” fucking dumbass. This is what happens when you assume.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 05:38 AM
1

Okay well I never claimed to be oppressed. I agree with the statistics that you presented cause I am a feminist and feminists believe in equality. Sorry you have the tendency to make assumptions, but that’s not my issue. Also do you think you can maybe point out where I ever said that women were oppressed? Also, can you point out to me what feminists aren’t working to combat those statistics. I’ll wait.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 05:37 AM
0

Funny how you make so many assumptions when I haven’t even made an argument yet. I just asked a question which you still haven’t answered.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 02:18 AM
1

Not really. Give me an example that’s not from female dating strategy. I think y’all are too dense to tell that sub is mostly satire.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 02:14 AM
-2

Sure if that’s what you wanna think. Grrrr so angry 😡 lmao
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 02:13 AM
1

I mean not really. I feel like the common consensus is that you just shouldn’t fight anyone cause it’s morally wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 02:12 AM
-1

It actually is. They’re both into fitness. It’s not obvious by what you can see of her body in frame but she’s really fit, has abs and everything. I think her large frame is partially due to the fact she used to be a thrower. Anyway if you’d rather inhale farts, that’s your issue my g. Besides, it’s an internet character. If you think that’s her actual laugh, may as well believe that Chris Rock talks like a southern weasel all the time and Kevin Hart always talks all pitched up like that every d…
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 08:09 PM
-1

He’s a reputable guy with a degree, a fitness page, and a personality so cry about it I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 07:17 PM
1

Like when it comes to what?
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 05:13 PM
-3

I like how y’all continuously insult feminists but when anyone insults Male Rights Activists y’all start crying over it. It’s old. Get a new shtick.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 05:05 PM
1

There was an entire post about some guy that told men on this subreddit to stop being cucked by western women and to go for obedient Asian women. I feel like there are a lot of posts on here that seem predatory and anti equality, but that’s just my two cents
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 04:54 PM
0

She literally has a boyfriend dipwad 😎
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 04:52 PM
1

I like how everyone in the comment section is so busy bashing this chick without acknowledging how absolutely stupid the guy’s statement at the beginning of the video was
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 04:51 PM
0

She’s actually not. She just has a large chest and frame. If you go to her Instagram, both her and her boyfriend are avid fitness enthusiasts. You should probably do some research before making assumptions
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 04:50 PM
1

Actually in fact if you read you would probably find out that I wasn’t even the one that brought up the military. I argue with the content I’m giving, my g. Again, reading is fundamental. You seem pretty addicted to making assumptions.
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/22 03:39 PM
1

Not really. Maybe if you read, you’d understand. Reading is fundamental buddy. Besides, I really don’t think Billie Eilish ever said she’s a feminist. You just make that assumption for everyone that says something gender politics related that you don’t like. Get a new shtick
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/22 03:36 PM
1

Yeah you said something about that my actions were a part of the feminist culture of getting angry about sexualization while they overtly sexualize themselves or something like that. Like that literally doesn’t make any logical sense
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 11:43 PM
1

I was responding to that but you said about my hypothetical 16 year old daughter. Given that she’s 16, no she’s a child, but if she’s a legal adult it’s not my place to judge what she chooses to do with what she posts. As long as all parties are consenting, what’s the issue.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 09:15 PM
1

I do remember you saying something about how feminists act in sexual behavior then get angry when they get attention. You literally said that earlier
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 09:13 PM
1

Well, I’m not talking about underaged kids. Besides the faction of feminism that wants pictures of underaged kids online are not feminists they’re just pedophiles disguised as feminists. There are bad factions of anti feminists too so you can apply the same logic by your point.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:58 PM
1

Also something on your stance about how women sexualize themselves doesn’t make sense. You say that women wear what they wear for attention but then get angry when they get attention? Well wouldn’t they just be getting what they asked for? If they really wanted it, there wouldn’t be any reason to get angry unless, oh wait, what they’re wearing is just an outfit and they don’t want attention. I promise you, a woman that wants sexual attention revels in it, and has no reason to deny it.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:50 PM
1

So what about the post where women referred to men loosely as rapists? If semantics aren’t an issue and your same logic applied to when you claimed that women were looking for attention. Why don’t you make the assumption that they could have possibly just been referring to men that commit violent sexual crimes? Most of the posts concerning that are on threads concerning men who are rapists so what if that was the generalizations used in that context? I mean I’m pretty sure when women referred to…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:44 PM
1

You sure do talk about women in such a general way for someone that got pissed off when feminists called men rapists. Also, I’ve talked to feminists too. I think you disagree with the movement because you’ve focused your attention on one faction. I don’t disagree with all republicans, I don’t disagree with all democrats, I don’t agree with all BLM protestors because I’ve learned to interpret things on a case by case basis before I’ve decided I’m anti anything. I’m anti extremist, I’m anti misand…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:34 PM
1

So why are you making the generalizations that these assertions are being made by the entirety of the feminist movement? I support the MensRights movement even though there are factions of it that do hate women and incel factions of it. It’s all because my dad was fucked over by the court system in favor of my mother. I let that cause matter to me than the internet culture surrounding MRA. Sometimes the worst type of activists speak the loudest making them seem like the majority. It’s really not…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:21 PM
1

I legitimately post sex audios cause no one makes content for lesbians. I’ve got other shit to be proud of so slow down on that, my guy. Besides, everyone is egocentric. That’s literally why we are having this conversation, why you had the need to post your comment publicly, why everyone does anything in front of people. Having an ego is a part of the human experience. In some folks, ego comes out differently than others. You post about weed and Bitcoin and politics because it’s a hobby. For som…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 02:08 PM
2

Well I mean the cancel porn movement was started by feminists but go off I guess. Again, no clothing, or behavior should warrant being treated disrespectfully. That’s what the feminist movement is mostly about. There are factions that encourage sex work but most of them just assert the idea that no amount of sex work or provocative clothing should warrant being treated as an object. If you are human, you are worth human respect.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 01:59 PM
1

Well then maybe you shouldn’t judge a book by it’s cover then huh? Once you get over the self aggrandizing narrative that your moral compass is more apt than anyone else’s maybe you’ll see something past your own judgements. I know one of those tiktok mirror flexers and he used to be fat, now he’s hot. People want to feel good about what they have where people can see it. Being looked at isn’t the sole purpose why they post it. Artists display art so people see what the artist put value in; Arti…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 01:25 PM
1

This is why people should think before they speak. Honestly, women that are asking not to be sexualized it’s normally outside of a sexual context. Of course they want you to sexualize their only fans. That’s literally the fucking point. But if someone is just existing outside of that context, there’s no reason to sexualize them. Women that argue against sexualization are arguing against the lack of respect that people show once they view the person as an object rather than an individual. No clot…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 01:19 PM
1

Yeah and I never deliberately argued against my profile being sexualized. What I’m arguing against is the idea that you seem to be using my profile as valid cause to sexualize me in general, when no, sexualization should only happen in a valid context.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 01:05 PM
1

I was just applying your same logic. That’s all. Besides, I’m biotech major, play piano, have a boyfriend, loving father, skateboarder, tons of hobbies. I really don’t need male attention. I have a female audience. I’m just writing fantasies. If that bothers you then, again, your prerogative.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 01:00 PM
1

Besides I’m sorry but if someone comes on my Instagram page making sexually explicit remarks, they are sexualizing something that isn’t sexual. If they go on my Reddit page and make those remarks, that is acceptable. There is a time and place for certain behaviors and I’m sorry you can’t make that distinction but that’s just simply not my issue. I think that’s something you need to solve on your own, dear.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 12:49 PM
1

Also I never said I didn’t want my voice to be sexualized. As you can see by my Instagram, that represents what I want people to view me as. People are free to enjoy and sexualize my words cause they are presented in that light. Also I’m pretty sure my invitation to “be sexualized” is by women since that’s who I post content for. 🤷🏾‍♀️ Plus I don’t need to sexualize my voice on the internet, it’s just fun for me and no one on that forum ever makes content for lesbian women.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 12:45 PM
1

Not really cause I can distinguish fantasy from the individual. I write and voice people’s fantasies so sorry that pisses you off so much. Besides, I just said that you seem like you don’t seem like you talk to women. I don’t really think that’s triggered. It was just an observation. Cause if you think all that women do is take ass pics and post selfies then it seems like you just haven’t talked to one. If you don’t wanna be labeled as an incel don’t talk like one.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 12:41 PM
1

Oh buddy, the words that I say should be sexualized, my person shouldn’t cause that’s not what I chose to present that way which is pretty evident in my Instagram which I do recall you saying would consist of ass pics and pleas for male attention 🤔 do you see that anywhere if I may ask?
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/22 03:22 AM
1

If you want to believe that, that’s your prerogative. No one online knows what I look like, if you think words are sexualizing myself then okay cool I guess. Sorry I’ve got sexy words. Honestly, you’ve probably lost so many brain cells smoking weed that you’ll believe anything. If you’re so concerned about what’s on my Instagram, it’s arria.hope. Knock yourself out.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 07:44 PM
1

Well, I have a dad that I love a lot cause not everyone that’s interested in sex has daddy issues. Honestly, not once did I blame men for anything under this post, you’re the one getting emotional and making assumptions.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 07:44 PM
1

Oh yeah also, the ones that I did post are for women so 🤷🏾‍♀️ cry about it I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 06:28 PM
1

Well number one, no I don’t have those type of pictures on my Instagram. I mostly just have photos of my friends so thanks for your concern but you’re wrong. Number two, it’s literally just my voice that’s “being sexualized” I also write erotic literature too. Those are based solely off of fantasy and they aren’t open invitation to view me as less of a person. Try again when you’ve got a valid argument
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 06:23 PM
0

If this is what you think women do then it’s very obvious you’ve never talked to one
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 09:02 PM
1

Not really. I have a lot of female athlete friends that go to the gym because they’re athletes or care about working out. I’m sorry but not everything women wear is about y’all.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 09:02 PM
1

If you wear a shirt that has words on it, is it an invitation to stare at your pecs? No, but it’s an invitation to read the words. Exactly how in this case the intention was to read the words.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 09:00 PM
1

Who said it was small?
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 08:57 PM
1

Okay but….why are y’all taking a sarcastic comment t shirt seriously? Y’all gonna start posting about 2015 “normal people scare me” shirts too?
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 08:56 PM
1

I mean there are men’s rights activists that are also incels. Does that make the whole movement a group of incels? No, it doesn’t.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 10:19 PM
1

If it was always about that, then it wouldn’t have a baseline definition in the dictionary about equality. What happened to my dad is a feminist issue because he was treated unequally by the court system because of his gender. Again, I’m pretty sure if you post of the two chromosome subreddit about what happened in those MRA meetings, it would be condemned. Did the entire feminist movement raid those meetings? No. Did the entire feminist movement say they support that? No. There are tons of peop…
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 09:52 PM
1

I condemn people who aren’t representing the movement correctly but I don’t label myself as an anti feminist. I’m anti extremist, anti misandrist, but I still label myself as a feminist cause the way that my dad was treated by the court system after divorcing my mother was unacceptable and that’s as big of a feminist issue as any. Sorry you’ve got the wrong perspective of the movement, but regardless of who you’re referring to, generalizations based on the actions of a few isn’t good for anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 09:38 PM
1

Again that’s your issue not mine. I’ve got a boyfriend and a father that I love. I’m not even lesbian or bi, my voice is hot and both genders like it so 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 09:34 PM
1

Number one, they’re titled as a feminist group, number two even under the narrative that the Men’s rights group is just solely focused on men’s issues why are you upset that by your definition of feminism, feminists are concerned about female issues. Also I’m a feminist that cares about men’s issues cause personally I was raised by a father that was fucked over by the court system. We both have the understanding that feminist isn’t synonymous with man hater. If that’s what you believe, that’s yo…
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 08:31 PM
1

Well, I’m a feminist cause I’ve personally experienced the disparities caused by the lack of feminism. Besides you can make the same point about men’s rights. When they do reference women, it mostly has to do with the impression that women actualizing themselves into roles they are passionate is suddenly them wanting to become men. Also, there’s the mother and son group, which was a group started by women in order to help their sons that were raised by single mothers to learn more about finding …
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 01:33 AM
1

You’re ignoring the factions of feminism that most women are a part of. Honestly, most of the basis people use for feminism being bad on this subreddit is internet buzz. Internet feminism is pointless and it sucks, but there are a multitude of other factions that are concerned with the equal rights of men and women. Both my boyfriend and my dad consider themselves feminists because there are issues of masculinity that are addressed by feminist groups. Generalization isn’t good for anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 10:54 PM
0

I mean not really. The definition is right there. Google is free.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 06:34 AM
1

Besides I’m sorry but you haven’t referenced any data at all. First you claimed you went to the exact same school as the commenter we’re under and now you fail to provide any reference to articles that state that women have more bugs, by insulting my intelligence, you’re just poking holes in your own argument. Insults is just indicative of someone that doesn’t know how to reason diplomatically with people that disagree
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 09:14 AM
1

Insulting my intelligence isn’t going to add validity to what you’re saying. Sorry you don’t have an understanding of population statistics or how demand curve works. Reading is fundamental. You should try it sometime.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 09:12 AM
1

No I said the placement system that you referenced does not take place on an international basis first of all. In most American schools, placement exams only exist using what you’ve applied to. That’s what I was saying doesn’t exist on an international basis. Sorry you misunderstood. Also do you mind linking me these specific articles and data? You also say that men aren’t having equal access to education when computer science is offered at 86% of American schools including on the two year level…
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 09:08 AM
1

I mean yeah there is, women didn’t have the right to vote, were sold into marriage contracts, were sold into harems, were collected as wives by cult leaders, African American slaves were raped in order to produce more slave offspring, many academic institutions didn’t allow women into higher education until the mid 1850s. I’m sorry my dear but the list goes on. Also you’re claiming your undeniable logic, but you keep failing to provide sources for what you’re referencing. I’ve got sources on han…
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:54 AM
1

Also you still haven’t given me your sources behind where you read that female programmers have more bugs. Cause I mean, even if that were the case, programmers work in teams where work has to be filtered through all members of the team before being published and given the fact that there are more males in programming, a woman’s program would probably have to be filtered through about three men. So, I don’t know how you’re getting the four one one on unpublished work. Maybe if you gave me your s…
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:34 AM
1

No you are functioning under the pretense that the “lower standard” isn’t just the minimum standard and the twenty points higher of a requirement isn’t just a influx deterrent. Besides, the example I used is economics but you see the same thing take place in population statistics.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 08:30 AM
1

Also if this discussion is about joining a campus, well then you’re only talking about the school you are referencing then because placement in most American colleges doesn’t take place like that but you’re using this instance to imply an international phenomenon when the actual international phenomenon is that there’s a uneven distribution of individuals that desire to go into the computer science field on an international basis
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 09:05 AM
1

Okay but you hinted that you went to this school that the commenter was talking about. What school is that exactly where they have the set of parameters? Besides I didn’t say it was pushing the intellectual capacity in favor of anyone, it’s pushing the population capacity. Besides economic concepts are economic facts? The entire definition of an economy is classified as a concept. If I said economic theory that would be different. Besides, until you could provide proof of what you’re claiming, i…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 09:02 AM
1

Let me give you a better example. If there are concert tickets in high demand and too many individuals from one state want to go to that concert, they raise the concert ticket price for individuals in that state, that doesn’t mean that the other states are getting low quality tickets. It’s a really basic economic concept that illustrates demand curve.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 08:38 AM
1

Bell curves are skewed by higher populations so if there are more men that enter the field, the standard has to be higher to put the bell curve back in the middle. It’s like the economic concept that in order to get more companies entering into perfect competition, the prices for the product have to lower. That doesn’t mean that it’s lower quality, it just means that there’s shortage. Also where is your source that most bugs come from female teams? If you would link me the article that you’ve re…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 08:17 AM
1

Not really my salary puts me at the top 1% of Americans. Internationally, that’s the top .001%
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:46 AM
1

Well it actually has one of the highest job security and low turnover rate of American occupations. Because no one wants to be a mortician, you get higher pay because they’re in high demand. And yeah people do get the creeps but it’s only because some folks are put off by the idea that death is just a part of life
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:45 AM
1

I’m sorry but saying that just because I’m a feminist I can’t have a biotechnology degree is such a fallacy. What proof do you have for me not having one?
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:43 AM
1

Yeah exactly that’s what I’m saying but you implied that you weren’t American so the first amendment right would not apply to you since it’s out of the jurisdiction of the body
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:42 AM
1

Russia, China, and turkey are all totalitarian governments with struggling labor laws and a fluctuating economy so I wouldn’t use them as grounds for success. Texas is also in the bottom 25% for education, so they’re also a bad example to use for prosperity.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:41 AM
1

Sorry you think so lowly of my job but I am making a substantial salary with the addition of having been in the marines as well.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:39 AM
1

Yeah I do actually. It’s always been really interesting to me because mortuary science is an evolving field that involves both chemistry, anatomy, and physiology. I’ve always been passionate about all three of those so I found myself pursuing funerary sciences
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:38 AM
1

No if I was a weak woman I probably wouldn’t have a biotechnology degree.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:36 AM
1

You did say that it was “stupid for you to assume that I’m even American” and yeah that’s what I just said the American constitution cannot decide matters outside of its jurisdiction. You just made my point for me. Congratulations
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:36 AM
1

I’m actually a mortician because that’s what my passion is. Sorry that my political beliefs make you think that I’m doing a certain job though.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:34 AM
1

I haven’t made an assumption about the way you look and again, if I was a person doing gender studies and I had no shame about it then I wouldn’t have a reason to lie. My major is biotechnology, sorry you have issues accepting reality
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:32 AM
1

It actually does. That’s why it specifies American citizens and why extra territorial trials have to happen in accordance to the individual’s homeland constitution and laws unless these laws have been deemed as international amongst the United Nations
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:31 AM
1

You said that I was wrong to assume you were American also I’m not deciding who gets rights. It says it in the American constitution who the rights apply to and it says American citizens
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:22 AM
1

Well given that I’ve got a degree in biotechnology not really.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:20 AM
1

No not really. I don’t have a reason to lie because if I was passionate about gender studies then I wouldn’t have a reason to lie about it. My degree is in biotechnology. Sorry if you’re too dense to grasp that.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:20 AM
1

Okay well you were claiming a first amendment right but that only applies to American citizens
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:18 AM
1

Like why are you so hellbent on thinking my degree is in gender studies. I just told you it’s in biotech. If you’re that stupid that’s your issue not mine.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:03 AM
1

I did reply I just don’t think you can read.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:02 AM
1

No actually my degree is in biotechnology. Do you know how to read?
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 05:01 AM
1

Okay but are you in America? Also if American girls are so bad then why is your main girlfriend American?
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 04:59 AM
1

Okay why are you so sensitive over women being In control of their own lives. Like idk that sounds pretty triggered to me
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 04:58 AM
1

Okay so less women being in porn doesn’t matter 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 06:49 AM
1

I’m also saying what my first amendment right allows me to. Besides you’re referencing that you don’t want to be cucked by American women so if you have a first amendment right that applies to you, then I’m guessing you’re in America. And unless you’re maintaining a relationship with your gf online, then I’m guessing she’s American too. 🤦🏾‍♀️ the amendment rights are only applicable to American citizens
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 04:58 AM
1

Well that’s not how the current world works right now. Also I’m 115 pounds which is 52 kilograms so idk what fat youre talking about 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 04:55 AM
1

You like to make assumptions huh? My degree is in biotechnology and I don’t really care about who’s bringing in money when both my boyfriend and I are so two people building wealth is better than one
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 04:53 AM
1

If the standards are lower that doesn’t imply subpar abilities it just implies that standards are higher for males because there’s simply more of them. I’m sorry you feel so personally attacked by the way that statistics work but it’s just fact that to deal with surplus, people set things higher to act as a filter. The scores that women get are adequate. Besides, it’s literally coding and computer science, something that can be done without a degree. Given the nature of coding too, there’s no su…
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 06:39 PM
1

Also if this narrative about boys not getting documentation because of women, I’m guessing it’s most likely because they went straight into their villain overlord story and didn’t consider something as simple as computer science programs at a community college or a certificate program through a university or online workshop. That’s kinda on them 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 01:49 PM
1

I don’t know what sci fi movie you’re living in but it’s definitely not reality. Besides if you don’t mind me asking so I can confirm these statistics, what school is this in question. Also just because more women are alive by a really minutiae percentage does not by default mean there are more women on campus. Also I’m pretty sure that regardless of the school, it’s trying to heighten the national average of women in stem, so in other schools where this imaginary test may or may not be applied …
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 01:41 PM
1

I’ve got a master’s degree and I do cook cause cooking is a life skill and everyone should know how to cook. If you rely on a woman to feed you then that’s a bit sad.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 01:30 AM
1

Okay well if your emotions are too weak to handle women in power then society isn’t stopping for you. You’re the one throwing a tantrum right now, not me
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 01:29 AM
1

Not really all you’ve done is throw needless insults at me and haven’t really given me any facts, so I really don’t think I’m the stupid one here
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 01:28 AM
1

Why are you so triggered. Stop being so sensitive it makes you look bad. Also I have a boyfriend and I respect myself enough that I don’t really need two of those. Cry about it I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 01:25 AM
1

Sure 🤷🏾‍♀️ but it’s just a term that people use when someone makes a pointless empty threat over the internet to appear tough.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:15 PM
1

Shiver me timbers
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:12 PM
1

Also no sense of realism to your little hypothetical scenario. You talked about the trials of war then turn around and talking about capping someone cause they’re a woman that disagreed with you
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:11 PM
1

And you have no impulse control ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:10 PM
1

There’s some jackass that thinks a conversation about gender politics will come up in the middle of battle. He’s not an asset to the troop. 🤦🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:08 PM
1

And men love to threaten violence in imaginary war scenarios apparently
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:05 PM
2

How? She didn’t say a words and she’s looking at the ground in realization. She’s also furrowing her eyebrows in understanding. Also the emojis on her side are heart emojis and the sad face emoji. So, why do you think she’s being hysterical?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 09:03 PM
1

Yeah yeah you’re just upset you can’t argue correctly
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 08:53 PM
1

Besides if you wanna see my degree I’m happy to oblige. Have you got imgur?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 08:49 PM
1

It’s in the spirit of you sweetheart 😎
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 08:49 PM
2

I was saying that people of good character have no reason to be shallow or have unrealistic expectations and he bashed American women and claimed that there are more good men and less good women. He also used several examples of women in his country claiming false accusations towards men so apparently he doesn’t think that either.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 08:04 PM
2

See what his response was to then try again.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 08:00 PM
1

Okay so why are we arguing then? I never said this guy is misogynistic. Guess we both put words in one another’s mouth then.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:58 PM
0

Lmao okay yall can’t get over the delusion that feminist is synonymous with man hater. I’m a feminist, I’ve got a boyfriend and a great father, my dad is a feminist. What’s the issue
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:55 PM
0

Okay I tried to be sincere but it’s obvious you don’t actually want to get along with women, you just want to find a reason to hate them. That’s your prerogative and that’s your issue.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:46 PM
0

Defending your argument from what? The same exact opinion?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:39 PM
1

Yeah so why is there a need to argue with me. We’re making the same point.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:37 PM
1

You just now disproved the statement that I commented under. So, women watch lesbian porn that still means that no one is paying to watch men fuck. Try again
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 07:25 PM
1

Okay 👌🏾 have fun watching gay porn since it matters so much to you.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:53 PM
1

It’s also not our fault that men don’t wanna pay to watch other men so cry about it I guess
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:46 PM
1

I honestly don’t give a shit. Point is, female empowerment isn’t all about sex work and if you think that’s what it is, that’s your prerogative
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:45 PM
1

So you’re just going to fail to address anything else I said. Aight.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:42 PM
1

Also I’m pretty sure there’s a huge part of women’s empowerment that you’re ignoring like idk the women in stem movement or the abstinence cause or the female education movement(s) you really think all of female empowerment is about sex work?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:34 PM
1

So you think most women support porn because only fans exists. I’m sorry but that’s very flimsy “evidence” the cancel porn movement was millions of people and they’re the reason why tumblr porn was taken down and why 1/3 of amateur porn videos were taken down so try again
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:32 PM
1

Cause my point of reference is the cancel porn movement that was started by feminist women because of the tumultuous amounts of trafficking and child porn on PH so 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:26 PM
1

Where
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:24 PM
1

Fair point on that first part but where’s your basis for the second part?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 06:08 PM
1

Any woman that is of good character doesn’t have shallow expectations for men and any man that is of good character doesn’t have shallow expectations for women. I think a lot of people have misinterpreted being a feminist as hating men and being a men’s rights activist as hating women but both those ideals reduced down to what their natural definitions are without media pollution are good. I think it’s hard to find people of good character especially when the genders are at war with each other. …
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:54 PM
1

Well if it negatively affects anyone then it’s not really equality is it? Besides of course feminists don’t fight for this cause most feminists don’t watch porn. Doesn’t take a genius. Also if the men that are in the industry were concerned with this issue I think there would be a lot more of them speaking out.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:46 PM
1

That probably has to do with the fact that men are paying to support female creators but go off I guess. I mean come on, I bet you’ve never subscribed to a male porn star in your life.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:41 PM
1

In what way is this actually a good argument? Men are the primary consumers of porn and they don’t pay to watch men fuck so 🤷🏾‍♀️ that’s y’all’s issue
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:40 PM
1

Besides if you’re saying that there isn’t a gender pay gap is a single gender dominated field why do you think there’s one for this one?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:39 PM
1

Just like how I would say that if female athletes want to be paid more, more women should watch their sports 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:30 PM
1

Okay so what about my statement is wrong then? I just said that if guys wanted men to be paid more, then they should support male creators
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:29 PM
1

Did you ever hear me expressly contradict that logic? It still applies in sports. So if you believe in the logic they applied to sports then that means you also believe in the logic that I applied in the porn field. Why are you griping for?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:24 PM
0

Also the reason why men are paid less is because of consumer interests. Men are the main consumers of porn, so why is that a feminist problem?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:22 PM
0

I am in stem. I was a biotechnology major. Also, are you actually going to address my point at all?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:19 PM
1

Also many Vietnamese women and Thai women are farm workers and laborers so they aren’t all feminine and willing to please like you say, that’s just a stereotype caused by the sex tourism.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:17 PM
1

Additionally your women are weaker clause doesn’t really apply to modern society. It’s true that women are weaker but it’s not like brute strength is needed to survive anymore so conceptually it’s not useful to anyone except labor workers👌🏾
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:15 PM
1

Also obviously they hurt your feelings somehow if you would rather go to a third world country. So, what does that say about you and your fragile ego?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:13 PM
1

That’s not what I’m saying. And my point went entirely over your head.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 05:12 PM
1

Damn wow I can’t insult dead folks now? Damn the world is full of snowflakes. Being all triggered and stuff. You insulted women first there buddy so 🤷🏾‍♀️. Besides I already have my master’s degree, so I mean tough titty. I’m just in the marines cause this is what I’m passionate about. Oh wait hold on you have so much respect for the armed forces right? Didn’t you say something about women not being useful soldiers? That’s not very respecting of the armed forces of you 😕
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 01:08 PM
1

You know I think the only insult I’ve given you was not being educated. You’re really pouring the insults on thick. Kinda just makes you look insecure. Anyway if you’re acting on instinct and would murder me in cold blood in this hypothetical scenario where gender politics would come up in the midst of war then that’s grounds for a dishonorable discharge from the military as well as a homeland murder trial. Have at it ig.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:58 PM
1

How gentlemanly of you. 😌 sorry your only arguments against women are hypothetical scenarios of violence. Never put them into action though, you should probably just find a woman that knows she’d be Chris Breezied if she disagrees with you. Win for everyone
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:46 PM
1

Oof weak argument alert. You failed to address half of what I said.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:42 PM
1

It literally only has like two meanings so 🤷🏾‍♀️ and if you have a psychotic break just because someone is disagreeing with you then you’re probably not mentally fit for active duty by today’s standards. They screen for mental health and impulse control. You’d fit very well with the WW2 rejects though. No wonder women are afraid of men. If they think they’re capable of being anything else but housewives, they threaten to Chris Breezy them. Smh 🤦🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:35 PM
1

Why would I be compromising your life if we’re on the same team. 🤔 male logic. Also omg you actually used the term “make you my bitch” if you want to be taken seriously in the armed forces, sweetie, you don’t say that.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:23 PM
1

Shiver me timbers 🤷🏾‍♀️ thought you liked protecting women or whatever. One disagrees with you and you threaten violence? Reminiscent of a true 1940s man.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 12:07 PM
1

Well you gloated about how valiant all those world war soldiers and asked me to prove how I’m better than they are are besides you said that you would “rather have the fit women” fighting that war rather than all those unfit folks they put in there. So yeah, you would actually want me watching your back. Also the kitchen thing is so overused. Find an original joke and you might be as funny as I am ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:56 AM
1

Eh 🤷🏾‍♀️ idk how to prove that but I do weigh more than 110 pounds, don’t have glaucoma, am not a underage kid, not obese, don’t have syphilis, and don’t have diabetes, but I do have Asperger’s so I guess you’ve got that one on your side. Congrats.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:46 AM
1

Well I mean I did give you evidence so cry about it I guess. I mean you can look up the minimum weight to go off to war and the syphilis outbreak and the obesity rate in 1940 and the glaucoma outbreak and the amount of severely autistic soldiers (I mean one of our favorites forest gump is on that list) google is free, so don’t take my word for it.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:42 AM
1

Not really but thanks for your concern ❤️ you got to give it to me though 😎 I’m fitter than a lot of those shmucks in world war 2
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:34 AM
1

I mean given that you tried it last time and failed, I understand if you have to keep your ego from getting destroyed again.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:28 AM
1

You didn’t deny it 😎
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:25 AM
1

If the principle that a society should be judged by its most vulnerable members of society is true, then that would also stand to say that most first world countries have legislature in place for the benefit of minorities, women, lgtbtq+ because a country’s success should be judged by the ability of all of its individuals to actualize themselves. One of the reasons why Vietnam is still a developing country is because it’s still trying to industrialize so human rights aren’t really on its to-do l…
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:12 AM
2

Oh it’s you again. If you really think that being pregnant is just sitting around for nine months then I feel like you’re grossly under educated
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 11:06 AM
1

Not really. There’s still depression that ensues with aborting a child and most women do it out of the fear of not being able to properly care for the child. Can’t trust the foster care system either. According to the child and youth services review, 40% of children in foster care reported abuse by a member in the system. I really think people in this subreddit are just pro birth, not pro life.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:58 AM
1

I like how everyone’s reaction is just to downvote you instead of actually giving a valid counter argument. It’s like they don’t have one.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:55 AM
0

The guy in the post literally said that we aren’t needed
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:49 AM
4

While traditional women shouldn’t be frowned upon and they are important to society, I think it’s also damaging to put it on a pedestal in the same way that it’s damaging to put men making sacrifices and working themselves to the bone on a pedestal. Most of the issues that the guy described like the expectation to be able to provide or not have any real emotions or always do the hardworking jobs is caused by the alternative expectation of women to stay in the household. The reality is that there…
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:44 AM
3

Why are you under the impression that this is an argument between them? She just as a question and you still had to insult her. It actually kind of looks like she’s sympathetic to the issues he’s describing.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:38 AM
0

Anyone is capable of screaming, drama and ill will. Besides, I think if the women in your life are screaming everyday and causing drama, you should probably revise who you choose to surround yourself with. Cause neither the men nor women in my life cause that many problems for me 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:33 AM
1

Probably because it took them off guard. I know that I would probably do the same in that situation. I really don’t think it’s that deep. I think they were just confused my g.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:29 AM
-1

I’m pretty sure y’all just can’t tell what satire is
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:26 AM
-11

I’ll tell you why and this is going to blow your mind. Most feminists are against porn. And there’s a pay gap cause men don’t really give a shit about the men that are in the videos. They watch the women, and subscribe to the women. So if y’all really cared about the gender pay gap then. Watch more gay porn 😌 hope that helps. Edit: y’all keep downvoting without giving me any counter arguments so yall know I’m right
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 10:19 AM
0

Also I’m pretty sure most of the population of registered sex offenders are men but go off I guess
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 08:07 PM
0

I’m a feminist. I’m not attracted to children. Try again.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 08:07 PM
0

What’s afap
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 05:09 PM
0

I’m sorry but your logic is so subpar. If all feminists are child abusers and man haters I guess that means all cops are racists and kkk members and all Christians are imperialists and all men are rapists. If you’re going to base your opinions of an entire group off the actions of a few you should probably just apply it to all groups while you’re at it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:51 AM
0

So where did I say I excused this behavior again?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:49 AM
0

Where did I say I was single? My boyfriend and I are very happy and he’s a feminist too so try again. You shot and you missed
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:48 AM
1

Where did I say I excused this behavior? I’m waiting for an answer love
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:46 AM
1

You’re really not as smart as you think you are if instead of having a conversation you resort to taunts. Tell me Neanderthal man how is disagreeing with something defending it?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:43 AM
1

So you’re saying because I mentioned I’m a feminist and that I’m overtly disagreeing with what the woman did? You’re saying that I’m defending her?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:42 AM
-1

*says I’m not defending this > proceeds to tell me why I’m defending this. I think that’s on you buddy.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:41 AM
0

I’m sorry but me being a wall isn’t a counter argument. You can respond when you actually have evidence
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:40 AM
0

“I don’t agree with this post” DURR CONTEXT CLUES I literally said I didn’t agree so what makes you think I’m defending this chick
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:38 AM
2

What about the feminist groups that make shelters for male victims of sexual assault? What about the feminist groups that shut down teachers that have slept with young boys? Those exist.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:37 AM
-1

You did not address a single point that I made in my statement. Congratulations you’re a dumbass.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:35 AM
1

Like when did I say I was defending this woman’s actions?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:34 AM
-1

Because people in this comment section brought it up firsts “yeah feminists are child abusers” all I was saying was I’m a feminist and I don’t agree with abusing children and all this subreddit does is generalize people. I believe in gender equality. That makes me a feminist so how does that make me a bad person?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:33 AM
0

Also I’m guessing you believe in men’s rights right? Where’s your holding men accountable for their actions and cancelling them for their actions. People do bad things. People should get cancelled whether they are a man or a woman shouldn’t stop that.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:27 AM
-2

Where did I say in my comment that I was excusing what this woman said? I literally said “I don’t agree with this post” tf did you think I meant.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 11:25 AM
-10

How?
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 06:41 AM
-15

I don’t agree with this post. I’m a feminist. People on this subreddit talk about being generalized then they do the same thing towards others. Do better.
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/21 06:41 AM
1

Nothing’s stopping you from leaving my g. I just feel like you have a hard time accepting defeat. It’s okay to walk away from a fight sweetie. No one’s judging you.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:58 AM
1

Your banter is so boring. It sounds like that of a loser kinda. Like when the guy who lost a fight tries to roast people. It’s really sad honestly you should just stop trying
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:46 AM
1

Also the personal attack was uncalled for 😔 I expected better from you.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:39 AM
1

Yeah I know it’s not a war cause women can’t fight in those right? Lmao keep crying it’s funny.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:38 AM
1

Someone can’t stand the heat cause I proved you wrong. Shame, shame, shame 😥
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:35 AM
1

Oof cry about it lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:33 AM
1

Also I just said I’m enlisted so yeah?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:32 AM
1

I’ll take this as a victory then since you failed to defend your whole view that misogyny doesn’t exist. Have a nice day loser.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:31 AM
1

Bro I just said that they came from World War One so they started recruiting shortly before the depression began because isolationism wasn’t an option for America, so they did have time to prepare. Also in a helmet in army gear in the midst of explosions and grenades, I highly doubt they could tell the difference bucko. You also said if the army employed women in times of war they would surely lose. I think the extra people power would cause a surplus in solders for one and if all of the fat peo…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:29 AM
1

So I’m going to restate the question. Now that you have a reference point to who they deployed to war, do you still think that women are incapable of fighting and surviving? If the answer is no, then what gender’s fault is it for sending men to die? Is that really misandry or is that people in power just abusing their power? Women didn’t ask to be protected, men just invalidated our strength. Stay mad.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:20 AM
1

Ah so now you acknowledge it. They would rather put weak men on the lines than capable women. Fighting in these wars was never about physical strength. And once again, these men still survived and fought so it’s not like they were even that weak.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:17 AM
1

Who was the one that wanted to touch children to begin with? And you’re walking a fine line of saying that all women are weak. I refuse to be stigmatized like that, not with having enlisted in the marines myself.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:15 AM
1

And what gender is it that is in positions of power in order to make those type of discrepancies happen?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:08 AM
1

Okay but how does that support your claim that women were incapable of serving in the war. If those people I listed survived and fought what is to say that women couldn’t? Also they did have time especially during World War Two because of the impending doom that World War One caused. There were also screenings in order to get into the military and not everyone was of legal age.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:07 AM
1

Exactly. What gender is mostly buying these young girls and inflicting violence upon them?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 03:00 AM
1

Okay so if they were capable of surviving and fighting in the war what is to say that women can’t
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:54 AM
1

It’s relevant to our discussion cause we are talking about widespread misogyny. So what gender is primarily subject to those violent crimes again?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:51 AM
1

Okay but your claim was that men were more physically fit for war and my claim was a world war 2 soldier can fight and be 110 pounds and 5’4 so if it was about being physically capable why were the standards so low
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:50 AM
1

What gender are most of the victims of these violent crimes
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:47 AM
1

That’s great honey you’re doing swell but you didn’t even answer my claim
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:41 AM
1

Women were banned from education, the right to vote, human trafficked, raped, subject to domestic violence because of their gender so I mean 😪
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:40 AM
1

Okay well there were grossly overweight guys that survived as well as underaged boys and underweight men so who’s to say that anyone doesn’t have the capability of surviving. If it’s about one’s fitness to survive, then this wouldn’t be the case. Not to mention, there were also mentally retarded people that participated in the war as well as individuals with asthma. Also men were made to still fight when they were sick, or had contracted syphilis which was very common. In the African American co…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:39 AM
1

Okay yeah but they don’t speak for all women or all feminists really. I’m pretty sure that entire subreddit is just satire cringe feminism but I’m really not actually sure cause sometimes those post make me fear that they are being real. Idk putting all feminist in the same vein as those people is the equivalent of calling all male rights activists incels. I’m pretty sure both feminists and male rights activists are shooting for equality
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:21 AM
1

Also if stamina or endurance was any type of real hinderance that the military was concerned with, they’d probably ban fat guys from going to war.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:18 AM
1

And how is society misandrist?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:06 AM
1

Sooooo the millions of women that have died or been violated, discriminated against, and stuff like that, all because they are women that isn’t misogyny?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:05 AM
1

Oh wait my bench press is 135 pounds. Would you look at that. I could bench a World War Two soldier
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:03 AM
1

Also the height and weight requirements during world war 2 for men going to war was to be at least 5’4 and 110 pounds 🧐 I know a lot of women that qualify
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 02:02 AM
1

That’s where your misconception is. Why do you think modern society is giving women a chance in warfare? If men think we are less capable, they are the ones that have invited violence and they send themselves off to war it’s no ones issue but their own
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:55 AM
1

A person can still withstand the demands of war when trained properly. Warfare is not about physical strength, it’s about following orders and being persistent. Besides, you’ve still avoided my questions. Also why is it a woman’s problem that men sent other men off to war?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:54 AM
1

Who were actually in the positions to make men get placed in those positions. Cause I promise you, women didn’t make the laws that put men to war.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:50 AM
1

Who were the government leaders, war leaders, fathers, lobbyists, speakers?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:49 AM
1

Yeah but they still train them to be capable of withstanding that environment. They put them in tear gas chambers, have them carry human sized weights, crawl through the mud, run in water, kill and skin a rabbit. Given all that training what makes you think a female soldier is less capable.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:48 AM
1

Who were the ones to put men in those wars?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:45 AM
1

You also know that they still have to train for combat conditions correct?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:44 AM
1

Now you’re just using semantics and you also failed to address 90% of my claim so. Try again bucko
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:43 AM
1

And if you have no idea how about you don’t claim misandry? Or argue against misogyny?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:41 AM
1

Okay but who were the ones that said that women couldn’t be on the frontlines to begin with? Why are you making the issues that women had no control over a problem for us. You basically said that you worked so hard cause we are incapable but you worked so hard because yall believed we were incapable. So why are male beliefs a female problem
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:41 AM
0

And that’s why misogyny still exist. This ideology that is to say that women can’t. You know women are eligible for all military positions right? Besides how is it misandry if y’all put these laws onto yourselves. Misandry would imply women hate men, put social structures into place, and make them do things they don’t want to, but then you use the example of war. That would more be about men hating men, putting them in positions they don’t want to. How about instead of blaming women for men’s is…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:38 AM
1

But uhhhh who was responsible from banning women from voting, speaking in church, divorcing their spouse, sexualizing the female form, most of the domestic violence cases, most of the rapes in America, leading the countries that started wars that y’all complain about having been a part of?
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:31 AM
0

Come on dude your move
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:29 AM
-1

Oh wait who told women they couldn’t fight in wars? Wasn’t it men?!? Who told women they couldn’t be a part of the general labor force?! Oh wait that was also men. Y’all complain about the hinderances that y’all put in place to begin with. If it wasn’t men who told men to fight in wars why did women have to cut their hair and band their chest if they wanted to participate 🧐🧐🧐
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 01:28 AM
1

Ay you can call me triggered but if you don’t have a counterclaim then I’m pretty sure I’m right. Cry about it I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 03:11 PM
0

Also again you’re completely ignoring the dichotomy of people. Where there is need, people deliver. So in an instance where for our livelihood, we had to make society continue to function, what’s to say that women are incapable of stepping into those positions
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 02:43 PM
-1

Guess what dipshit, it was mostly women doing that.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 02:38 PM
-1

Ah it’s almost like your basic simple sentence ass answer ignored every point that I just made.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 02:00 PM
1

It’s just kinda dehumanizing
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:41 PM
0

This meme was made by a 14 year old boy on Instagram dipshit
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:40 PM
0

Okay but I can see how this is hurtful given the fact that he hooked up with her. Imagine someone hooking up with you not because they found you attractive but because they were horny.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:38 PM
1

Don’t men do a version of the same thing? 🤨🧐 this is just something people do when they want to have fun in their twenties and get serious later on in life.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:34 PM
1

Most women don’t major in gender studies. 💀 where are y’all getting your statistics from
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:32 PM
1

Y’all complain about gold digging but yall also complain about a woman choosing her career? Shit do you want to see women with their own money or not?
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:30 PM
0

I’m pretty sure it’s just to balance out the disparity between the two. More men apply so they are going to make the standards higher. It’s not favoritism, it’s just statistics
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:27 PM
1

Kinda hard to believe that an entire society turned into being misandrist in the last twenty years after centuries of misogyny but aight.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:25 PM
-4

Oof that insult sounded like a seventh grader that just learned how to use cuss words. 😭👍🏾 keep it up buddy you’ll get there
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:11 PM
-5

Hm who knows. What would cure yours?
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:07 PM
-15

Cry about it
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:03 PM
-14

Right back at you pal
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:02 PM
-2

Y’all do realize that there are women in infrastructure maintenance too and if there was no one to fill their jobs, then shit would still hit the fan if women were to disappear. You’re also pretending like there wasn’t two world war’s in which society had to be kept afloat by women cause men were off dying. Society was perfectly fine.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 12:01 PM
1

Okay y’all are pretending like the entire race of men invented everything. A few did, not all of y’all. So, the world would be just as fine without men as it would without women. Both would cause a major social and economic crash. It takes all kinds of people to make the world.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 11:58 AM
1

It’s really not a compliment though. Like it’s a type of music, people like music. The whole most girls shit is so dated.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 11:55 AM
-22

What’s wrong with you
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 11:53 AM
1

No I was talking to the other guy sorry
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 10:44 AM
0

So people flash you everyday?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:17 PM
1

So why are you like “the poor guy’s ears 🥺” maybe he shouldn’t have flashed his dick to people with air horns.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:16 PM
0

If they didn’t consent to it, then yes. He walked into their view, in their area, to make them see something they didn’t want to.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:15 PM
1

You’re assuming this guy wasn’t just an asshole. Plus not reading it all the way through isnt a basis for justifying your argument. This guy was in the wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:13 PM
1

Also the article directly under the one you referenced, said that any forceful witnessing of a sexual act without a viewer’s consent, is sexual assault.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:11 PM
1

This post also said that unwanted communication, messaging, displays, and harassment is also assault
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:09 PM
1

Okay fine let’s go on the basis that the article backed what you said. If assault counts as touching the victim, well given that they used blow horns, they didn’t touch him
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 08:03 PM
1

Also what’s to say that making a loud noise in your ear is assault, not contact was made
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:58 PM
1

“Indecent exposure conviction in most states results in the registration as a sex offender in that state”
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:58 PM
1

I just looked at the article that definition is from and it directly disproved your claim
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:51 PM
1

Indecent exposure is a form of assault. It’s call sexual assault
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:43 PM
1

Both are assault though. If you assault someone, there’s going to be retaliation
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:30 PM
1

How
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:26 PM
1

If you punch someone, do you expect to be punched back?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:25 PM
1

That’s not the same logic, the intention behind this guys actions was to get a reaction. Someone dressing in a type of way is not.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:23 PM
1

Okay but your entire argument is based off the idea that there’s something wrong with this guy that he’s got no control over. Besides, why are you defending this guy so hard? He did something wrong and they reacted. If people do something provocative first, then people will be provoked.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:17 PM
1

Also most of prison inmates have mental illness and they still got the full consequences of their actions. Besides flashing people does not fall under the jurisdiction of criminal insanity those are reserved for violent or extreme crimes
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 06:34 PM
1

You like to make a lot of assumptions huh? That movement wasn’t even a movement, it was a social media stunt that feminist extremists took part in not feminists. Also again you’re assuming that this guy was mentally ill and not that he just wanted to stir people up.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 06:33 PM
1

Okay well number one mental illness does not excuse poor behavior and number two if he didn’t want to get attacked maybe he shouldn’t have flashed people huh? People need to be responsible for their actions
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 06:08 PM
1

Would you be stoked if a guy came up to you and flashed you?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 05:53 PM
1

Well now you’re making assumptions just because you want to defend someone that was flashing people. He came in their space and attacked them first. They just retaliated. If a guy came up to me and flashed me, then that’s perfect cause to injure him
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 05:49 PM
0

While I understand what she’s saying, why is it so bad to view ourselves as equals
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:54 PM
1

Well you can’t claim someone is wrong without giving reason as to why. If you don’t have the capacity to defend your view then you don’t have the capacity to claim someone is wrong either
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:48 PM
1

Are you actually defending a guy flashing people?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:25 PM
2

Well you were so quick to shoot down her point but then you had no way of defending your own. If your default is to shoot down someone else’s point without asserting your own then it’s the equivalent of saying “you’re wrong but I’m not going to tell you why” it just makes you look ill informed.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:24 PM
1

Also it doesn’t matter what life path you choose, it doesn’t justify abuse so regardless of them being prostitutes, their still victims. People should be treated like people regardless of their life choices. If you don’t believe that, that’s no one’s damage but your own.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:22 PM
1

The reason why the feminist movement even started here was because women were unhappy. If they were so happy, why did it come here to begin with. Besides, that’s still illegal these days, it has been illegal for a long time and yet it still happens. And again, after World War Two wanna know what else happened? Women in the workforce. They continued to be a part of the workforce because they were unhappy with their sedentary, repetitious lifestyles as stay at home moms.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:20 PM
1

That guy literally flashed people. If you talk about a crime call him out first
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:13 AM
0

So is the foster care system. Fix that before you wanna save something that’s not sentient yet
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:09 AM
1

When did women ever say men have to wait on them?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:08 AM
4

The depiction of 50s housewives being happy is such bs. Domestic abuse was common and so was depression. If you had to stay in a house all day cooking and cleaning for a less than grateful family, you wouldn’t feel all that happy.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 07:06 AM
2

Well I mean, you kinda didn’t answer the question though.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 06:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter