TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

benjwgarner Archive

View 0 posts and 162 comments by benjwgarner on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

No, because the SPLC is a racket. They send people mail with outrageous made-up claims of legions of bogeymen to scare them into sending them money.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 02:18 AM
4

"A comet has appeared in the sky! We must sacrifice someone to appease it!"
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:44 AM
12

"The ref has internalized misogyny!"
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:53 PM
1

It's a computer graphics joke.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:13 AM
5

"That's just the bare minimum standard to be a Decent Human Being™! What do you want, a cookie? Stop being so entitled!"
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:58 AM
3

Interesting. I asked because in many places with electronic access control, the policy is one person per scan. If there are multiple people at the door at once, each one individually scans their badge/card/RFID tag, goes through the door, and closes it behind them, preventing piggybacking. This ensures that the electronic system is responsible for verifying identity, rather than the individual employees looking at badges. With such a policy, it would have been a problem for her to not have done …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:46 AM
1

Is that vampires that are supposed to work like that? There's a lot of mythology about malevolent beings that cannot enter a building unless they are 'allowed in'.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:55 PM
6

So if someone is behind you, the official policy is that you are supposed to physically look at their badge? Is there electronic access control?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:49 PM
1

James Damore said very similar things and they called him sexist.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:00 AM
1

There is! It's called Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:24 AM
2

While archiving is often misused to prevent traffic to sites people don't like, its real purpose is to preserve information in case the original goes down.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:18 AM
1

Lyudmila Pavlichenko is credited as the third deadliest sniper of all time with 309 confirmed kills.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:42 AM
25

And when they figure out that people can lie about whether they said 'yes' or not, will you need a notary and witnesses?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 01:29 AM
3

The IGN article seems pretty neutral.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:30 PM
5

The mistake here is taking her speech as if it were intended primarily to communicate information instead of emotional grooming This is exactly what happened: it is this same mismatch played out yet again: the same offense at sincere attempts to share information, the same incorrect accusations of misogyny and mansplaining, the same complaints about randos, and the same misunderstanding of private vs. public on Twitter. As Alice Maz wrote in that article, the problem was that they were using dif…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:18 PM
2

Do you have any evidence of that?
/r/MensRights07/07/18 04:36 AM
14

To prevent that, put a backslash before the # character. \# displays as #
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:29 AM
1

The "shit test" hypothesis doesn't make sense. Why would they try to get men fired for passing the shit test?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:42 AM
0

Anyone who 'likes' being degraded has serious underlying issues and needs help.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:07 PM
2

If I lose half of my stuff twice it leaves me with zero. Technically 25%. I told her we can do everything like have kids, because I do want more. Anyways, I said we can even have a wedding and tell everyone we are married. I'm just not signing that paper. Check the law where you are; in some places this heads toward common law marriage territory.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:42 AM
1

"I'm saying to you, we've not called for the killing of white people, at least for now. I can't guarantee the future." -Julius Malema, Member of Parliament and leader of the EFF Source
/r/MensRights16/06/18 10:35 PM
2

Ah, thanks. It wasn't exactly clear.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:09 PM
1

The use of archive links to reduce traffic to a site you disagree with is a dumb misuse of archive links (what I'm assuming that you're assuming was done here). The real use, which we see here, is to preserve something in case it is removed or the site goes under.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:54 PM
0

If you are a woman, your baby daddy is the father of your child, not your husband, and often not your current (or exclusive) partner. This term was created by American black people (probably modified from Jamaican Creole), likely because of climbing rates of black children in the US born to unmarried parents (now at over 70%), so they needed a more concise word to describe such a common relationship.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:19 PM
0

This is ridiculous. Those aren't greeting cards; they're political pamphlets. The issues are real, but obviously no store is going to sell those as greeting cards because they would not sell.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:02 PM
0

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:56 AM
3

Remember when teaching children not to steal or kill resulted in being able to disband the police because they weren't needed anymore? Me neither.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:19 AM
3

Welcome to the flip-side of Schrödinger's Rapist: Schrödinger's False Accuser.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:12 AM
3

Infinite punishment cannot fit finite wrongs.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 10:42 AM
24

..."And here's why that's a good thing"
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:16 AM
1

Ok, but you can't criticize women for cheating if you do it too.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:20 AM
1

outie instead of an innie cringe
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:33 AM
4

Do you want lettuce on that?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:16 PM
1

At least you admit to being an asshole.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:15 PM
16

Choosing things based on merit? That's racist and sexist! /s
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:09 PM
2

Usually, ignorance is not something to be proud of, but in this case, I can't argue with that! 😂
/r/MensRights27/05/18 09:00 PM
3

How do you feel about all the people who shot their local sheriff after listening to this song?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:11 AM
5

They're talking about a show called 13 Reasons Why. "Reasons Why" is part of the title.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:56 AM
3

I think it solves more problems than it could create. Private citizens are permitted to use bodycams, and are legally permitted to do so in public, on their own property, or in a third-party private place with their permission. Police body cameras shouldn't be subject to these same restrictions because it would prevent recordings of much of what they do. Police must be allowed to do additional things that private citizens are not permitted to do (such as pulling people over, for instance) in ord…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:41 AM
3

I'm glad to hear it, but I don't trust BLM. They unquestioningly accept anything that fits their narrative. Just look at the events in Ferguson, which caused the movement to grow rapidly. The physical evidence and the testimony of witnesses supports the account of Darren Wilson and that the shooting was justified, but the "hands up, don't shoot" lie is still repeated and believed by BLM.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:42 AM
2

allowing police to tailor their statement to the recorded footage. How is that a bad thing? If police statements have to match the recorded footage of what actually happened, they can't lie about what happened. That is the purpose of body cameras.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:30 AM
3

We demand an end to the criminalization, incarceration, and killing of our people. This includes: ... An end to the mass surveillance of Black communities, and the end to the use of technologies that criminalize and target our communities (including IMSI catchers, drones, body cameras, and predictive policing software). https://policy.m4bl.org/end-war-on-black-people/
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:34 PM
4

We demand an end to the criminalization, incarceration, and killing of our people. This includes: ... An end to the mass surveillance of Black communities, and the end to the use of technologies that criminalize and target our communities (including IMSI catchers, drones, body cameras, and predictive policing software). https://policy.m4bl.org/end-war-on-black-people/
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:33 PM
19

Yep, there's a reason much of BLM is against body cameras now.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:41 AM
1

They can call it BechdelBot.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:14 AM
1

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/parkland/florida-school-shooting/fl-reg-nikolas-cruz-prison-love-letters-20180327-story.html
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:50 AM
1

These fetishists have an Achilles heel: the concept of "kink-shaming". If they accuse you of something, just say it's your fetish, make a bunch of noise about how intolerant they are for not tolerating your fetish, and they'll often back down. Just look at fetish communities: both misogyny and misandry as fetishes are huge. They think it couldn't possibly be the least bit harmful to do anything as long everyone involved is "consenting" (although they play fast and loose with the definition when …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:12 AM
1

These dress codes are common in public schools.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:10 PM
3

/u/ottermoobies is either recommending that single, disenfranchised men be sent off to the meat grinder of war to kill them off, or saying that this is how past societies dealt with the problem.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:08 PM
127

Affirmative action sabotages women and minorities who earned it because people can suspect that they didn't.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:02 AM
4

My guess is Elevated Sportz is the name of a business. Edit: It is. Blame them.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:09 AM
4

No, just a really boring theme park.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:16 PM
9

What a coincidence, Mark Thomas assaulted me just yesterday in Utah! Since the accusation is the only evidence needed, I expect him to be tried and convicted soon.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:57 AM
25

Never be embarrassed for something that isn't your fault. You are not responsible for what other people do.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:28 PM
3

I'm sure; I was just making a joke because the name is weird. Of course, I do have a printer with that name, so I guess it's not a completely crazy thing to call something.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:41 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8i178i/students_convicted_in_kangaroo_title_ix_courts/dyolq5v/
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:36 AM
-2

You can't say that, that's racist! /s
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:59 AM
1

The archive archived the paywall.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:53 AM
2

@ChanelMurder Username checks out.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:51 AM
6

Archive Link: http://archive.is/GfmIy Full Text: By The Editorial Board May 7, 2018 6:27 p.m. ET Title IX has become an unchallengeable totem on American campuses, even as some students unfairly accused of sexual misconduct have been deprived of due process. And now students found guilty by dubious campus courts may be publicly named—and their reputations ruined—if a North Carolina judicial ruling is upheld. The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled last month that the University of North Caroli…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:46 AM
1

civilization highly specific social orders Not the same thing. The fact that humans were able to construct civilization and other animals weren't is because of differences in intelligence, not differences in masculinity.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:44 AM
1

Link is broken. This one works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:40 AM
6

What is "Brother"? Is that anything like this guy?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:30 AM
3

That's what image editing software is for.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:00 AM
19

Sounds like an Onion headline.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:48 AM
9

And, according to what they say, talking to someone wearing headphones is harassment!
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:31 AM
6

This may be part of it, but I think it has more to do with what Karen Straughan talks about in this video.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:26 AM
8

But it's not the same thing. He didn't try to revoke consent for originally banking his sperm (deciding after originally agreeing to bank it that he thought it was "stolen"), he tried to revoke consent for any future use of it.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 04:51 AM
10

He's not retroactively revoking his consent. He didn't give consent for his sperm to be used; she forged his signature.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 02:55 AM
2

even in the face of evidence, or an utter lack of evidence, or a known unreliable source, people (you might generalize 'women' but I think this applies to many) want to believe the more interesting story, and sharing 'information' (whether real or not) is a way of demonstrating a form of power, and for people who have piss-ass shitty lives and no power over their lives, they like to assert control over other people in any way they can. Exactly. This explains gossip.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:24 PM
1

That image in the BBC article looks like a 4chan collage. It's from some random person's tweet, but I guess embedding tweets and talking about them is what we consider journalism in this brave new world of ours. It's also a lot less offensive than the media is making it out to be. I was expecting "I hate fags I hope they all get AIDS and die lololol" or something.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:07 PM
1

"Be guard, thot!"
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:33 AM
1

You can't do that on the mobile app. Also, if you're tired of seeing it, you can block it.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:15 AM
3

"Luke and Yoda" is also a phrase I've seen used to describe the same thing.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:37 AM
9

The effects can be similar.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:41 PM
12

It's not politically correct, (of course, what on this subreddit is?), but it's not batshit crazy. In fact, the UN actually talks about doing much of this.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:40 AM
2

A studio audience? Wishy-washy? Nah... /s
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:21 AM
34

"Aliens" doesn't necessarily mean "space aliens" (these guys 👽). In this context, it means "foreigners". "Turning everyone brown" is being used to mean "replacing the people living there now with people of other ethnicities from elsewhere".
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:13 AM
5

At some point, walking the minefield just stops being worth it.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:58 AM
2

Indeed. It's intentionally misleading language. It's a tactic used by propagandists and cultists to sneak an idea past a person's reasoning and defenses without it being consciously considered. It's a linguistic Trojan horse.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:46 AM
1

Lol even the simple words "me too" have been co-opted to mean something else.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:42 AM
1

That's not the only reason. That's not even the main reason. The main reason is that men commit more violent crimes.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:42 AM
1

You can't let that go on. If you need to use physical violence against him (up to and including lethal force) to make that stop happening, so be it.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:39 AM
1

It's almost like a legal system designed by lawyers was intended to do exactly that.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:27 AM
5

Also, if you make a stink about the “identity politics” component, you’ll be souring your career prospects by throwing in with the neckbeard types who make these arguments. I'm not saying your work wasn’t as good as theirs, or better, but you really don’t want to be the intolerant guy right now. It was never ok, but it’s even less ok in our current media environment. Because only "neckbeards" would see why this was a problem. Having a problem with this is "intolerant" and "was never ok"? You're …
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:17 AM
1

*chaperone?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:53 AM
1

Do you happen to have a link? I'd like to read that.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:49 AM
5

"I need some muscle over here!"
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:36 AM
2

And Bernie Madoff made off with the money (until caught). Karl Sims with his simulated evolving creatures. Ronald Reagan ("ray gun") and SDI. So many examples. Coincidence? Synchronicity? The subconscious at work? Some god or the universe with a perverse sense of humor? Probably the first. Interesting to consider, though.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:44 AM
3

Bobbitt Nominative determinism strikes again!
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:58 AM
7

It's easy to get them confused; it's actually The Talk.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:53 AM
6

Wow.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:59 PM
2

Bad
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:11 PM
0

Why was it closed?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:49 PM
1

This is a man risking himself to protect a woman he loved and is married to. It's convenient and interesting how you left that out, but apparently gender is too much of a focus on your mind where you would see gender-related issues even when they're not there. I'm not leaving that out. It's not like I went somewhere else and retold the story conveniently leaving that part out. I'm commenting on this post in which everyone has (ostensibly) read the post. I'm pointing out the specifics of why it w…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:51 AM
-1

They still need to be called out on certain things being said, and this subreddit shouldn't condone those comments. So do that. Call them out on what they say. But going around calling people incels isn't that. Again, this specific situation doesn't display a gender related issue, and you, along with anyone else, would be incredibly naive if thinking otherwise. Whether right or wrong, there is a social expectation (and a biological drive) that men risk themselves to protect women. This is a man …
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:20 AM
1

Seriously though, why should I give you a break? I'm not asking you for a break. This doesn't really have anything to do with me. This thread has nothing to do with men's rights. There is the concept of "disposable men" in the MRM, and the attitudes of society about that. This does fit into that. but you're socially retarded if you don't think This is kind of what I'm getting at. Personal attacks along the lines of "lol u incel autist ur so socially retarded haha u have no friends go back to you…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:04 AM
0

I think a lot of people's opinions here are colored by their own experiences. That doesn't make them right. It does seem, though, that there's a lot of "lol u incel u just bittr cuz u can't git gf" that doesn't help the discussion. Edit below: A lot of people in this thread are acting like this one woman's actions are enough to say that all women are awful and just use men until they're broken. Still doesn't have anything to do with incels. I think it's also the fact that she got a lot of agreem…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:54 AM
0

And both ways are shitty.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:26 AM
3

The "incel" namecalling here is even more rampant than the "shill" accusations on political subreddits. Give me a break.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:23 AM
1

Nowhere really rehabilitates most violent offenders, and certainly not these. By the time someone decides to beat a random couple with bats, they are far beyond any help. People often argue whether the purpose of prison should be punishment or rehabilitation. This is the wrong question. The real purpose should be sequestration: to permanently keep people separate from society who have demonstrated that they are too dangerous to be allowed to roam free.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:20 AM
4

By the fact that he said "SO" instead of "ex", you're probably right. I hope you're not, but she basically admitted that she didn't really care about him.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 10:37 PM
2

'Cultural Marxism' has about as much to do with Marx as social Darwinism has to do with Darwin: very little.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:35 PM
1

Only if the 'no' is afterward.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:27 PM
4

Same here. It's gotten pretty bad.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:58 PM
3

That's not just suffering abuse, that's doing something to escape it. It's courageous, but I still wouldn't call that heroism. True heroism is risking or suffering harm to yourself in order to help other innocent people. I think it's important that we not dilute the meaning of the word by using it in situations where it's not appropriate.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:20 AM
1

She should be permanently locked up. She is a danger to society. 15 years from now, she won't be any less dangerous. A person capable of this is too dangerous to be allowed to roam freely.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:28 PM
5

I have to feel like he is a hero to put up with that shit. Suffering abuse is not heroic.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:27 PM
6

Note that if the genders were reversed, people would say this was victim blaming. It is a legitimate question, though. From the article: she became violent towards the man, who the court heard suffered from hydrocephalus which is caused by a buildup of fluid inside the skull which made him vulnerable. Hydrocephalus causes mental impairment; that's probably the case here.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:26 PM
1

That looks like it, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:07 AM
1

https://youtu.be/LUna51rI_eQ
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:33 PM
5

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:20 PM
2

https://youtu.be/N-Esh4W3dfI?t=0m32s /s
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:16 PM
1

I don't like the insinuation that a person's value lies in their gross productivity output. I don't either. But you know you've really got a shit deal when you aren't even valued for that.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:39 PM
3

Did they know, though? If they didn't, that's a problem.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:53 AM
1

From Wikipedia: Führer . . . is a German word meaning "leader" or "guide". As a political title it is most associated with the Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, who was the only person to hold the position of Führer. The word Führer in the sense of "guide" remains common in German, and it is used in numerous compound words such as Oppositionsführer (Leader of the Opposition). However, because of its strong association with Hitler, the isolated word usually comes with stigma and negative connotations w…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:02 AM
1

I didn't say that. Did you mean to reply to someone else?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:15 AM
2

Well, because it shows up on your comment already automatically so you don't have to type it each time.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:47 PM
1

Why do you sign your comments like that?
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:47 AM
1

You've never been a little boy We're comparing adult men and women here.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:38 AM
1

But "gay fish" would probably be a fan of South Park.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:34 AM
1

I didn’t realize your reddit account was a post modern art project. That would explain so much of Reddit. Hell, the whole internet, too.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:33 AM
7

Username checks out?
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:04 AM
2

That's really sad. They're trying so hard.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:42 AM
10

almost exclusively women were persecuted by men There were more women than men in most places (more men than women in a few), but it wasn't "almost exclusively". Also, both men and women were active in persecuting others for being witches.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:25 AM
1

let's do ball fondling as a greeting instead! I mean it makes sense, anyone you let near your balls is someone you trust, because they can crush your balls in an instant. I swear I've heard of a primate species that does that for that reason. I can't remember which one.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:05 AM
2

I wonder if people would accept that position just so they could have legit business cards made that say Your Name, Sex Tsar on them.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:14 PM
1

I think it was a joke.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:10 PM
1

What's the ESCAPE button? Is the idea that it's a panic button that redirects you somewhere else if your abuser walks in the room or something?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:18 PM
1

No. It's not the kid's fault.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:13 PM
1

*men?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:29 AM
1

That's crazy.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:56 AM
1

That sounds dangerous.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:11 AM
13

But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:40 AM
60

According to #Metoo, he's not innocent, he's a guilty rapist who is lying. How can he still support it?
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:35 AM
1

In this manner, yes. Overall, Sweden is closer to completing mass cultural suicide.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:55 PM
4

They would be laughed at and ignored.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:39 AM
2

It's a very legitimate concern. If I had a girlfriend who I found out was secretly selling my underwear to random women on Craigslist, I would break up with her. If nothing else, it's a huge a violation of trust. But really, there's plenty else.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:34 AM
1

And now they've got fathers doing it too.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:26 AM
1

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:25 AM
12

Sweden is worse.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:45 AM
7

"If you’re going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh or they will kill you." -Attributed to George Bernard Shaw, probably apocryphal
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:56 PM
50

So that's why intersectionality is such a shitshow.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:52 PM
-1

Didn't they recently ban the letter N?
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:50 PM
1

Remember: when bad things happen to women, it's men's fault. And when bad things happen to men, it's still men's fault. /s
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:27 PM
2

See, they identify as being enlightened so that makes them actually enlightened! /s
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:24 PM
2

It's the Billy Graham rule for teachers.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:22 PM
0

It's also being used in the media to euphemize rape and human trafficking by migrant gangs in Europe.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:20 PM
3

The full clip is here for anyone who hasn't seen the context.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:20 PM
1

including meeting up in a Walmart parking lot late at night for a hug 🤔
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:16 PM
8

Post title says "infant". Let me rephrase: how can anyone do that to a child?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:59 AM
9

That's a good point: the way the topic is treated by the journalist in this case could be considered as significant as the protest itself.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:46 AM
5

They support anonymity for accusers, but not the accused. The accused are often not allowed to know who their accuser is (a basic legal right) in extralegal university kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:43 AM
3

Wow, this is horrible. I'm going to call Walmart and get this magazine banned! /s Oh wait...
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:34 AM
2

This is Walmart embracing puritanism According to the article: The National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which changed its name from Morality In Media in 2015 You may be right.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:28 AM
19

He added that she is engaged to be married Oh man. Watch out.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:21 AM
2

That's weird, I must have slept through World Wars III through XI.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:03 AM
11

How can anyone do that to a baby? I feel sick.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:42 AM
17

Civils With real engineers things are different Shots fired :D
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:36 AM
2

Imagine the shitstorm if it had happened like this: "Now, my class is very small, only 21 people in it, and it was a general agreement that I should be class rep (for some reason). Then, the two muslim men in the class spoke up and said that they would rather a man be the rep. And just like that, I was no longer nominated class rep."
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:43 AM
2

It was used to match the terms in the original post. 'Ladies' became 'gentlemen'.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:32 AM
1

"Do you understand these instructions for being seated in an exit row as they have been explained to you? Federal law requires a verbal "yes" from each of you." Yeah, not likely to happen when people are having sex.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter