TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bennejam000 Archive

View 5 posts and 105 comments by bennejam000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, it's has passed thus far, the video is highlighting that though this bill has gotten thus far unchanged, feminists are still fighting to ADD gendered language to the bill. As of right now, the bill is decently written. Feminists are seeking to change that prior to it becoming full law. The legal ramifications of the proposed gendered language - whether or not a male can be a victim of domestic abuse under that change - is where the argument over legal male abuse is centered.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:32 AM
26

If I'm not mistaken, that's where the feminist side of the argument comes in. They want the gender neutral terminology to be changed, in effect only making a law against violence where a woman is the victim. This does not de facto legalize violence against men, as assualt and such would still apply, but the protections for the victim and such under this bill would definitely not apply.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 04:20 PM
2

1: what is a tradcon? 2: This is exactly how my household runs and I for one praise the hell out of my wife for working. It's an ongoing joke with us that I may provide the house, but her check keeps the lights on. She finished her BA in Music and teaches at a local school. If it wasn't for her working we wouldn't be able to really enjoy life together. Her having a fulfilling day job is what lets be spontaneous and not live paycheck to paycheck.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:49 AM
2

It's reddit though, so sanity is relative and still in short supply.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:00 AM
6

Can confirm kicking in of door, or very similar. I had a roommate a few years ago while in tech school that couldn't get his keycard to work in the door after drinking like a fish one Friday night. He had been pounding the crap out of our door for 30 minutes before a sergeant showed up to let him in because someone else called about the noise. I was told this the next day because I was sleeping like a rock. Note: the room was big enough for two desks, two xl twin beds, and 2 chest of drawers. I …
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:58 AM
3

So gynocentrism strikes again... woot...
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:59 AM
1

Vasalgel and the switchy thing from Germany. Two of the prominent options that seem to be gaining traction. But if we really want to get into, there's a plethora of options on a mechanical lvl without having to interfere hormonally with males. The argument that the male pill is hard to do is mute in light of how easy it is to alter the physical aspect of male fertility.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:36 AM
6

If I supported reddit even a little, you'd have gold right now.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:17 AM
3

Even so, this simply points that women are far more likely to harm a child in any fashion.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 11:11 PM
0

Did I just find a unicorn? A redditor agreeing with another redditor?! If I had gold, I'd give it. Seriously. In all fairness though, when it comes to debate members in this sub tend to be more open in debates.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:48 PM
0

It was nice to hear her perspective on the topic though. IIRC, she refused because she didn't want the crazy backlash from society (feminists), and not because of some personal stance on men should never hit women or something. The whole interview was more of a PR thing on her part, trying to stay out of that mess.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 09:19 AM
1

Can confirm. Ours is a pastel purple is color... not my first, second, or third choice.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:40 AM
2

I hate the way it sounds, but it's entirely true. At least in my marriage it is. I pined after my wife for years and it finally clicked that I didn't need to prove myself to her. We'd always been friends and when I stopped constantly trying to "be the perfect guy" is when we finally became more than that. She's told me since, that was when she realized what I was worth to her. Women need to see your value beyond the money and the glittery lifestyle that is often envisioned and when they do is wh…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:36 AM
5

The double think of the third wave. Tits aren't sexual, but you can't look at them because that's sexual. I wish I could give you more upvotes. :/
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:37 AM
3

She played the card, but it wasn't to pander to 3rd wave women. She played the card because without it, she'd be lost in the Republican polls and sure as hell lost against Hillary. It was more of a counter woman card than anything. It's not like she's harping on the injustices of women and lobbing shots at Trump's (more than slightly) misogynistic comments.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:16 PM
1

I know in lights of things its not polite to laugh, but that was kind of "pun"ny...
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:59 AM
4

We're not arguing that you (assuming you're standing behind what you write) aren't doing it for us. We're pissed that you say you are, and then do the opposite. We're pissed that for some gynocentric reason you have the conch right now and we can't seem to say a word politically that caries any weight. Well, the conch gets shattered and adults show up sooner or latter, so with your side of things devolving at a quickening pace, it won't take long for this sad story to end. I just hope there aren…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:03 AM
1

The opposition to helping women into technological fields is in caused by the multitude of reports that the problem with women in tech is simply, women "in" tech. They don't choose it, it's not something most women flock to. Incentivising it only makes it so those few that do choose it, quickly out earn the men who busted arse to get into that field. Juxtapose that with little to no help anywhere in any field for simply having a cock and you're looking at what appears to be blatant bias towards …
/r/MensRights15/10/15 04:18 PM
1

Not a screenshot, he flat out linked to it. And the comment section is full of wacko's. Minus that one rational person .
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:15 AM
1

"Legally authorized" in this case is why Alabama wants to pass this. I think the house will probably strike the next few words, "to be married", so as to make it clear that they are not the ones condoning the marriage, but rather allowing what they view as a civil contract. The purpose isn't to take rights away, but rather do one step further than prop 9 did in California. Rather than having a separate but equal title for same-sex couple, civil union vs. marriage, the entire state will simply ca…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 01:42 AM
1

That rebuttal isn't document proving her wrong as much as it is a Facebook post by a butt hurt general saying, "how dare you call me a liar! What I say is true and what you say isnt!"
/r/MensRights02/10/15 08:48 AM
2

Unfortunately, the military doesn't afford it's members the same whistle-blower protections many would think, because while you may be safe from immediate reprisal, your inability to be a yes man and nod along with the circle jerk going on above your head will keep you from promotion. It's very much a political training ground being in the military in the US and most decisions like these women's extra training and privileges happen well over the heads of the people carrying out the orders. The a…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 08:32 AM
6

Agreed and it's a perfect platform from a gaming perspective. I've use wiki a billion and one times as a knowledge base for "non essential" stuff. When it comes down to it, you just have to know who's writing what. Authors have points of view and it inevitably will skew the work.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:37 AM
1

Now I have an idea. Drag through this sub with all of these kinds of articles and make a buch of cards with the facts about the incident and the charges after pleas. Make it kind a like Balderdash, but instead of obscure words you're guessing on the charges/verdicts. Can make it a board game or a drinking game. (I'd say classroom exercise, but...)
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:18 AM
1

It should be a moot point since she has remarried. It was my understanding that child support could be dramatically reduced if the custodial parent remarried and is now operating on 2 full incomes. That said though, the more passive strategy of lawyering up would be your best bet in not screwing your ex.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:03 AM
1

The confusion is based in the left right dichotomy of our age. The conservative/liberal side of the aisle has shifted throughout history from Democrat to republican and back. We're at another turning point and it's not yet recognized by all.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:47 AM
6

She has no business practicing law if she can't abide within the law. If she's going openly abuse the system to ruin lives, that's reason to disbar her right there.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:34 AM
2

"Orange cap" There are laws about that orange tips for this exact reason. In Texas if you pick up the package that these types of toys are in, you will see a warning about that cap and it's importance to law enforcement, and you have to be 16 or older in most places to buy them.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:44 AM
1

Can confirm. Was run off the road a few years ago by a semi (totalled my first car, I loved my sidekick...) dipshit state patrol wrote an accident report that made the thing entirely my fault and didn't match the damage to my vehicle at all. Insurance company not only got that cleared up, but managed to get the trucker's contractor to pay extra to replace my baby. Police do get it wrong occasionally, but that's what the legal system is "supposed" to fix.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 07:02 PM
1

It's the cross-examination of a witness. Feminists and related research get their spin from their point of view, and then we as the skeptics question and pick apart their spin. We as MRA's should do a better job of being the defense in the courtroom of social justice by being better acquainted with the prosecution's methods.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:42 PM
2

Wasn't she under a gag order about the mess anyway? It was my understanding that the only reason for her post investigation shenanigans was that the "art" was a loophole or something to the gag order. When It was obvious why and who it was about it should've fallen under the gag order again and Columbia failed to follow through.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:57 PM
1

How big was the mushroom cloud when that time bomb went off?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:20 AM
2

Perfect description of both sides at the end there. Describes my Bros and my wife's cliqs.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:12 AM
1

Create an echo chamber and you can hear yourself in high Def surround...
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:10 AM
2

And if you follow this sub at all, you'll see as many stories of female statutory rapists as you will about men's lives ruined by embittered women. (Hint: that first one happens alarmingly often)
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:04 AM
2

My apologies, my phone displayed them backwards.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:35 PM
2

How about you read the dads reply before you get bent out of shape. I think he was trying to phrase it to cover a broader topic instead of just this one child. He Wasn't Being d!ck, rather inquisitive.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:28 PM
2

Whole heartedly agree!
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:58 PM
3

Thnx
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:27 PM
11

He forgot the /s It was total sarcasm. I can see his point though, in the US especially, anything remotely "deviant" (I use that term loosely) is viewed as men's perversions. It not a far stretch to call this legal slutty shaming of men. Edit: spelling...
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:00 PM
8

There's legal standing to argue that too. Prop 9 in CA was overturned based on that.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:46 PM
2

This!! All the way. Tolerance doesn't mean I have to change my ways or views, but that I have to accept that yours are valid and that you can practice your beliefs in your space.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:47 PM
1

That's a very blunt way of putting it. Women do work as hard as men (in general), by picking up the slack at home which is why they earn less.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:19 AM
3

What he's stating is that the 77 cents statistic is based on wages earned (wages), not pay rates (pay per an hour). The studies that support the 77 cents claim don't compare the pay rates of like jobs to each other, but rather national total wages of each gender. They average the doctors and the burger flippers and say that women only bring home 77 cents to a dollar men bring home. They then assume it's because women don't get paid as much as men, but they don't explore any other reason as to wh…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:16 AM
1

The whole being able to just talk to her is what screwed you and OP. The only thing feminists really want these days are for men to be too afraid to speak to them.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:07 AM
5

Currently in the AF and it's worse on our. I recently heard of a TSGT not being allowed to accept an award on stage because HE didn't look profesional in his uniform (too round). Imagine if it was a female that was told this?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:24 PM
2

Laymen speak is they might be able to cripple the swimmers?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:41 PM
26

This is why I fear fatherhood...
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:16 AM
1

If I could gild you, I would. That is the perfect analogy!!!!
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:24 AM
9

Guess I know where I'm gonna move when I get the chance.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:17 PM
3

Even if he did, kudos for wording exactly what all of us were thinking (in the sarcastic humor kind of way). I'll admit, it crossed my mind when I read it. Then I actually tried to think about what she meant and my brain couldn't do the gymnastics to get there.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:15 PM
4

The whole idea here is a phallicy
/r/MensRights15/06/15 04:33 PM
6

If reddit wasn't about to implode, you'd get gold for that.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:15 AM
18

Has everyone forgotten about Janet Jackson? There were congressional hearings for F*ck's sake.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:13 PM
0

Y'all is a contraction. You - all and is common place in most of the southern US. I now feel slightly low class.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:46 AM
2

Not from what I read about it earlier. It's run by one guy who's just finished grad school. It'll take a bit, but I can see Voat replacing reddit, on the market, if not just online.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:58 AM
1

No win no fee lawyers would be affect while leaving father's need families out of it, if say they made a gambling law out of it. Supporting is one thing, expecting pay out is another.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:31 PM
1

But what about Bruce Ge- I mean Caitlyn?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:24 PM
3

Can someone elaborate on the Silverman thing... I think I let that one slip by me. :/
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:41 PM
1

You missed the point of that argument. As a couple they could have decided differently and ultimately the decision to divorce was theirs as well. It's all about their choices and nothing I don't remember the government corrects your mistakes part of school, so the onus is on the individuals involved. And honestly at their income level, nobody need pay anybody. The sh!t end that stick is still gold plated compared to over half the country.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:24 AM
5

I agree with you, 100%, but you're actually arguing a different point. You're arguing that self responsibility should be a thing and that's precisely what feminism fights against. They don't want to be held to the same standards, they want better.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:11 AM
1

The difference here is that the "candy" could potentially leave the "baby" with lasting emotional scars. That analogy was way off base and regardless of intent did in face demean the defendant. Anyone who would have heard that comparison would have made the connection to calling attractive women candy.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:50 AM
9

I can't up vote that last line enough. I actually just had that same conversation with a black couple my wife and I are friends with and she basically said the subway thing was cool and I called her put on it. Funniest thing to watch her hamsters do summersalts to justify one but not the other.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:41 AM
2

Reading riches like this give me hope that colleges in America might be able to turn around. It's as if with all the publicity (mostly negative) from all of the spurned students and teachers the pendulum is starting it's backswing.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:47 PM
2

I understood that you were pointing that out, but the phrasing doesn't carry the same tone as if you said it aloud. It's the type of sarcasm that doesn't carry over when written down. Crossing out the replaced words helped, but appearantly not enough for all. :/
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:36 PM
3

They might actually, it's a solid way to get an income of you're tech/market savy. Leaves time for games.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:57 AM
1

And some women meet the standards It's not discrimination to expect that applicants meet job requirements.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:42 PM
2

Exactly one of the pints the MRA wants to make. We want society to recognize there are biological differences between the sexes and women (in general) can't do everything we ask of men.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:06 PM
2

We want the women that do do these jobs to fit the standards of that job, not the new "eaual" standards that lower the bar.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:28 PM
5

It's because they're the only ones crazy enough to believe it. Normal people can see the satire, while feminists already support these kinds of ludicrous statements so it's not that far off base for them.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:56 PM
8

What u/TheCitizenAct is pointing out is that they delved into the womans suicide, but glossed over the man's. It really was simply because she was female, but they gave her attention where men go unnoticed and that's why it's men's rights - y. The male suicide rate is astounding and when it happens no one cares.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:49 PM
2

I was under the assumption that the rumoring was just as defaming as media coverage when your as public a figure as Druggar or Dunham. That's why this is a men's rights issue. Rumors get ignored for girls and explored for men. It's the double standard.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:03 AM
7

IMHO, what makes this a men's rights issue, is that for Lena, after her book, the media left it alone, but with Druggar, it's years after the outing and it still won't quiet down.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:12 AM
1

I understand having that go to security zone, but the way this term gets used isn't like that. especially in reference to classes at colleges, it gets tossed out like it should be some kind of insulated bubble where no one can say anything that even remotely hurts someone else, like in an article I read recently about a group of students trying to remove some serious literature from a class because it depicted sexual violence. It was a historical literature class or something of that sort and th…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:48 AM
1

When it comes to trying to make classrooms and campuses safe spaces from certain words and ideas, then that is just censorship under a different name. Imagine with me the dream, the MRM can prove the censorship in court and feminist implode (because we trip all the triggers).
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:50 PM
2

This exactly. But this is only possible because it's a private system. It's the private money makers looking out for their own money. If it were a government insurance system, they'd have to cover both and that's my problem with Obamacare. If they're mandating it, as the government, they have to mandate it both ways.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:34 PM
1

Agreed, doesn't stop me from at hitting the gym a few times a week though. I'll be Arnold, but I can at least feel good with what I have.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:39 PM
1

This definitely has MRM relevance and it stems back to gamergate and the misogyny in gaming. This is just another one of the SJW attacks at video games that Buzzfeed is becoming known for.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:57 PM
0

exactly how I feel. IMO I think that the winners and losers mentality should be left to sports and other real competitions where it's structured that way. The gold stars, and classroom motivators are about pushing yourself, not beating Suzy for the most stars (though it couldn't hurt if that happens).
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:10 AM
5

On this one, I don't blame feminism, I blame a lack of caring enough family to teach this poor soul about responsibility, accountability, consequences... reality... sex... emotions... ... I'd say she was raised by animals, but even wolves mate for life. The modern society is teaching kids, and girls especially that they can do no wrong and if they feel bad about something, it's someone else's fault.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:25 PM
3

I can't give enough upvotes. I've noticed this too, and sadly I can't seem to pinpoint anything as a reason other than my generation (which I'm deeply apologetic for, I can't stand the entitlement). We've been spoiled and think everything should be handed to us. Then we expect the government to level, not the playing field, but the scoreboard, as if it doesn't matter if you didn't do anything, here's your trophy. (heh, typed that before I realized it was stab at the little league everyone's a wi…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:18 PM
7

He made perfect sense. Have you ever been in the stalls in men's rooms at stadiums or concert halls? They really are just as packed as the urinals. The women's rooms are spaced out. in the same space men would be expected to seat 5, a women's room will seat 3 and that's not counting the handicapped stall on the other side of the room. Women's restrooms in public spaces aren't efficient because they aren't designed to get in get out. They're simply another gathering place, a social venue at a soc…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:13 PM
1

The difference is everyone leaves Appalachia (and rural areas with the same problems), out of the news because a couple of hillbillies doing stupid stuff doesn't make news but God forbid a black kid in urban anywhere runs from the police and gets hurt doing it (understatement I know, but even minor stuff like that makes the news).
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:37 PM
1

I think that's actually the correlation being made. It's not the low income that's causing the crime, it's the lack of decent male role models as a byproduct of the nation ensuring mothers can raise their kids. The problem arises as women become more capable of financing a household without a second income and marriage isn't a necessary structure. The households lack male influence for young boys who search for that influence and in areas that have heavy gang influence, they can influence young …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:32 PM
-10

Insulting her like that isn't what this subreddit is about. I don't disagree and I'd venture to guess most people here don't, but it's not something we should be doing as a movement. People like her don't need fuel to stoke their flames, they'll burn themselves out all on they're own.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:01 PM
1

What this article proved was that the earnings gap exists because women choose to work less hours.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:13 PM
1

Get an upvote because references.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:01 PM
2

No, but getting a broader message out of the boards and into the mainstream media, I feel, is going to become nigh impossible. If it's about unfair courts, public censorship, or almost any other issue we talk about here, win or lose, it's going to be shut down even more so than it already is. There's already memes and political art about how almost any rhetorical attack on Clinton is "sexism". And God forbid she looses, it'll be SJW's not a Floridian Governor crying for a recount and any movemen…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:00 PM
3

I'm not here to argue whether an assault happened; it did. But to say that the masses of people on the beach or even the venue is responsible is asinine. When does the open beach become responsible for someone getting drunk? We can't keep blaming others when personal responsibility fails out. I'm ashamed to say it, but my generation can't look at their own actions and take responsibility for their own screw ups.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:22 PM
16

Personally, I see this going south for the MRM because of how sensationalized it's going to get. That, coupled with how the vast public of the U.S. go crazy for the "celebrity" (Beiber,Kardashian,pick a person famous for being famous), means Hillary will be flocked to and defended by a mass of the misinformed and regardless of whether she's the right choice for the country, she'll win on that alone. The Feminist movement will get such a huge spotlight that anything presented as an MRM agenda ite…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:45 AM
3

I would argue that the solution to this problem wouldn't be to have everyone censor themselves for the sake of "the ears in the corn." One person's civil liberties don't end where someone else's start (with limited exceptions). If I say/do something that offends you, you have every right to throw a tantrum and cry and be hurt. But just because it bothers you doesn't mean it's wrong or that there should be a law in place for it. The government's job isn't to police our moral compass and by microm…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:25 AM
1

Shadow banned for this? Wow... Nice bot. Nice bot.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:19 AM
3

I read this in Red's voice from "That 70's Show"
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:16 AM
5

I find intelligence attractive. This comment for the win.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:15 PM
13

I took it more like when a kid gets a window into the world outside of what their parents let them see, like a family member passing or loosing a pet, and they realize the world has some shitty parts. It felt more consoling than patronizing to me.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:31 PM
11

Was at a joint training army post. Can conform. We all get the same more or less. Every branch. Even saw a PowerPoint reminding men who stop to give roadside assistance "not to rape".
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:05 PM
2

I get the hip thing. I'm not a large man myself, but I have hips, and a butt... The pocket thing annoys the hell out of me. My uniform was fit by "professionals" and I look like I'm wearing flare bottom skinny jeans. If I buy my own pants/shorts I usually up the waist an inch or two and I always wear a belt.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:02 AM
3

This is exactly what I meant. Way fewer words. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:25 AM
12

False dichotomy doesn't apply to this because the post isn't "assuming" two sides, but rather detailing the two narratives given via the media and gamer gaters themselves. It's an appeal to reason. Which story is actually believable? His fallacy is saying one is true over the other because it's simpler. For what it's worth though, I agree with him though.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:40 AM
1

Similarly, their concern that alcohol increases the complexity of a sexual assault is particularly baffling coming from legal scholars. Massachusetts courts have repeatedly held that “diminished capacity resulting from the voluntary use of intoxicating liquor is not a defense to rape.” OK, law grads, alcohol doesn't absolve you of guilt, but the cleansing power of antiseptic can wash away consent? What your role models are telling you is that the system you want is assbackwards. Its guilty until…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:44 AM
2

That didn't sound like a hedge, and while I can't speak as to her intentions due to the fact that I have not seen or read any of her other material, she makes a solid case that this is harmful to both genders. Moreover, her comments about women, are to clarify the opposite of modern feminism, that women don't see men as brutish apes in need of training. This video by itself, apart from other works, promotes men's rights/men's ideals and equality, by stating the falsities of this stereotype from …
/r/MensRights11/10/14 04:28 AM
3

Me too, but there's no sympathy coming our way, so empathy seems to be the only thing to fall back on.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:00 PM
3

But saying that is "victim blaming" how dare you accuse young ladies, beholden to no one (not even themselves), of instigating or being the primary cause of anything. They are in fact ladies (drunk, problematic, potentially memory impaired, but still unaccountable for themselves), and deserve to be treated as such (infantalized, blameless, innocents caught in the middle of the "patriarchy")... Until women are held accountable for their actions, it's not equality, its superiority.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:45 AM
1

I say the best way around this, is for men to take the low road for a change. This law can be broken and trashed in a week flat. Man goes out with woman, dry evening of no alcohol or other consent removing substances. They hit it off and decide to "go for it". Man regrets it halfway through, she's touching him, she wants him. He tries to back out and she keeps going to try and change his mind. Female on male assault, report it, and let the system implode.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:15 AM
0

Maybe its because most of the women and children aren't in these "shelters"? I wouldn't put it past Hama's to use the specific buildings as publicity, forcing Isreal to fire on protected sites but having already evacuated most of the civilians. With numbers this skewed, who's to say the " civilian" men are all civilians and not Hama's supporters helping the fight?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter