TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

benny_pro_paine Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by benny_pro_paine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

so happy 1%er believing in bullshit (incorrectly) over here
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 06:48 PM
1

great point, because what is revealed is not the sex (genitals), but the babys gender (social role). also proves the social rituals that construct people as gendered. great point!
/r/MGTOW25/10/19 05:47 PM
1

love is a burning thing and it makes a fiery ring
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 12:20 PM
1

you mean this model? https://www.instagram.com/p/BqLIla_l1dm/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link ​
/r/MGTOW14/03/19 11:16 AM
-1

wow so english is white and male now? jesus i never knew!
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 07:21 PM
1

Oh sorry you find my reductionism 'incredible"
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:10 AM
2

aint that 10 fancy ways of saying protects and offers stimulation?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 08:38 PM
0

he wasnt circumcised. i was, preemptively. where im from it was standard procedure in the 70s and 80s for 'hygienic reasons'. so far i have not found any disadvantages and really would like to understand what intactivism is all about. or rather what the fuss is about.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:14 PM
-2

thanks for the lecture. actually, an insect stung him when he was 8 (swimming at the lake) and because the foreskin could not be pulled back there were complications and a nasty infection. my parents decided cc for me to avoid that. is that part of the agenda? plus i am not sure if all these therapies you mention were in place in 1975.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:59 PM
-2

whats with this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phimosis i was ccd for prevention of this because my older brother had it age 8. no trauma so far (im 45)
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:30 PM
3

op is the rickroll of antifeminism
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:33 PM
-4

kinda shows how little this subreddit is about /mensrights
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:01 PM
1

thanks!
/r/MensRights28/02/19 10:39 PM
1

whats a memelord?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 08:24 PM
1

tell me more about these issues of mine
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:14 PM
1

oh darling you really won me over with your smart ways edit: and superiority
/r/MensRights28/02/19 06:38 PM
-1

call me a liar three times plus little else: thats entrenched
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:41 PM
-2

see thats what i meant with entrenched.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:30 PM
-12

well look at this subreddit, my friend. many mistake being for men with being against everyone else.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:24 PM
-13

your just entrenched in your own misery
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:11 PM
-16

OP is totally right. so maybe MRAs should stop shitting all over transpeople, women, and others, and say: maybe this patriarchy and high demand for masculinity and success isnt working out too well for everyone, including men. so please MRAs: apply the same logic for men and transpeople and WORK TOGETHER
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:39 PM
2

Non-Advocate, you cant even read the quote I gave: "we have been OPPRESSED by men's phys­ical advantages over us". This quote is not denying male physical strength, but says its what oppresses women. As 'anyone with a basic understanding of feminism or society would agree' no feminist or woman demands to do away with male muscles and outlaw gyms for men. This silly and wrong intonation of 'a feminist' makes the sentence fishy at best. Its still not 'evidence' to your highly objective mind, I kno…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:26 PM
2

lets see: i read the book, gave you a quote, a link, and my interpretation. you so far have only given your scepticism. lets see you have the same discussion with the other people who take this as anti-male propaganda. then i might believe your need for 'evidence'
/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:40 PM
1

where is 'evidence' that this book is real? you have to judge for yourself. i dont know why that is so hard for people here.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:54 PM
2

how does 'angela confidential' prove this was written by a female feminist psychologist? edit: be your own damn judge for once
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:39 PM
8

If you spend money on this hoax, youre silly. Download here: http://norskk.is/bytta/menn/damn_angela.pdf seriously, this wasnt written by a woman or feminist, but by a prankster playing this community.manufactured outrage.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:23 AM
4

People, please read the opening paragraph of this book: "As women, we have been oppressed by men's phys­ical advantages over us since the beginning of humankind. But now, in today's modern societies, the tables are finally turning" This is not written by some feminist or woman, but by an antifeminist looking for a scandal. This is a damn HOAX. Download here to verify: norskk.is/bytta/menn/damn_angela.pdf Dont spend a penny on this
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter