| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Science vs Feminismso happy 1%er believing in bullshit (incorrectly) over here | /r/MGTOW | 26/10/19 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Science vs Feminismgreat point, because what is revealed is not the sex (genitals), but the babys gender (social role). also proves the social rituals that construct people as gendered. great point! | /r/MGTOW | 25/10/19 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Is love just neediness?love is a burning thing and it makes a fiery ring | /r/MGTOW | 16/03/19 12:20 PM |
| 1 | This.you mean this model? https://www.instagram.com/p/BqLIla_l1dm/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link | /r/MGTOW | 14/03/19 11:16 AM |
| -1 | Way to go Rickywow so english is white and male now? jesus i never knew! | /r/MGTOW | 13/03/19 07:21 PM |
| 1 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionOh sorry you find my reductionism 'incredible" | /r/MensRights | 12/03/19 09:10 AM |
| 2 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionaint that 10 fancy ways of saying protects and offers stimulation? | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 08:38 PM |
| 0 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionhe wasnt circumcised. i was, preemptively. where im from it was standard procedure in the 70s and 80s for 'hygienic reasons'. so far i have not found any disadvantages and really would like to understand what intactivism is all about. or rather what the fuss is about. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 07:14 PM |
| -2 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionthanks for the lecture. actually, an insect stung him when he was 8 (swimming at the lake) and because the foreskin could not be pulled back there were complications and a nasty infection. my parents decided cc for me to avoid that. is that part of the agenda? plus i am not sure if all these therapies you mention were in place in 1975. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 06:59 PM |
| -2 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionwhats with this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phimosis i was ccd for prevention of this because my older brother had it age 8. no trauma so far (im 45) | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 06:30 PM |
| 3 | I vehemently hate 3rd wave feminism and all who support it.op is the rickroll of antifeminism | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 05:33 PM |
| -4 | Insightful words from a 14 year oldkinda shows how little this subreddit is about /mensrights | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 12:01 PM |
| 1 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menthanks! | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 10:39 PM |
| 1 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menwhats a memelord? | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 08:24 PM |
| 1 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among mentell me more about these issues of mine | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 07:14 PM |
| 1 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menoh darling you really won me over with your smart ways edit: and superiority | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 06:38 PM |
| -1 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among mencall me a liar three times plus little else: thats entrenched | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 05:41 PM |
| -2 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among mensee thats what i meant with entrenched. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 05:30 PM |
| -12 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menwell look at this subreddit, my friend. many mistake being for men with being against everyone else. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 05:24 PM |
| -13 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menyour just entrenched in your own misery | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 05:11 PM |
| -16 | If people can say that the reason the suicide rate among transexuals is so high because of the way society treats them. Then its perfectly acceptable to apply the same logic to suicide among menOP is totally right. so maybe MRAs should stop shitting all over transpeople, women, and others, and say: maybe this patriarchy and high demand for masculinity and success isnt working out too well for everyone, including men. so please MRAs: apply the same logic for men and transpeople and WORK TOGETHER | /r/MensRights | 28/02/19 04:39 PM |
| 2 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??Non-Advocate, you cant even read the quote I gave: "we have been OPPRESSED by men's physical advantages over us". This quote is not denying male physical strength, but says its what oppresses women. As 'anyone with a basic understanding of feminism or society would agree' no feminist or woman demands to do away with male muscles and outlaw gyms for men. This silly and wrong intonation of 'a feminist' makes the sentence fishy at best. Its still not 'evidence' to your highly objective mind, I kno… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 08:26 PM |
| 2 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??lets see: i read the book, gave you a quote, a link, and my interpretation. you so far have only given your scepticism. lets see you have the same discussion with the other people who take this as anti-male propaganda. then i might believe your need for 'evidence' | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 06:40 PM |
| 1 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??where is 'evidence' that this book is real? you have to judge for yourself. i dont know why that is so hard for people here. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 04:54 PM |
| 2 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??how does 'angela confidential' prove this was written by a female feminist psychologist? edit: be your own damn judge for once | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 04:39 PM |
| 8 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??If you spend money on this hoax, youre silly. Download here: http://norskk.is/bytta/menn/damn_angela.pdf seriously, this wasnt written by a woman or feminist, but by a prankster playing this community.manufactured outrage. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 11:23 AM |
| 4 | How to destroy a man now. This is a real book telling women to file sexual harassment cosine against women. How was this even published??People, please read the opening paragraph of this book: "As women, we have been oppressed by men's physical advantages over us since the beginning of humankind. But now, in today's modern societies, the tables are finally turning" This is not written by some feminist or woman, but by an antifeminist looking for a scandal. This is a damn HOAX. Download here to verify: norskk.is/bytta/menn/damn_angela.pdf Dont spend a penny on this | /r/MensRights | 25/02/19 11:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter