~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "MGTOWS only talk about women"Lol | /r/ExRedPill | 24/12/25 10:37 AM |
| 0 | Debate: About toxic masculinity*You're | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/17 05:44 PM |
| 0 | Debate: About toxic masculinityArgument from single counter example, well shit your single example without context has me convinced as I don't understand basic reasoning. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/17 05:31 PM |
| 1 | Can someone explain hamstering and how it is a uniquely female trait?Seriously, do you think this shit is actually convincing? Your appeal to praxeology is about as convincing as an appeal to phrenology in that any nontrue believer who knows the term knows that it's bullshit. define praexology and then explain how it's defintion actually works with the passage that I have quoted twice. Praxeology can only really be accurately described as an heuristic process to the the extent that all knowledge of the physical universe is based on heuristic discovery because mat… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/17 11:44 PM |
| 1 | Can someone explain hamstering and how it is a uniquely female trait?I note that you still don't own your mistake in the way you defined heuristics and attempted to dishonestly use its etymology. further discussion is probably pointless. I appreciate your concern for my ego. Feel free to point to the actual argument that you think is mistaken. again, argue against me and not at all my points. you might want to review praxeology since you clearly know fuckall about it. feel free to define it and link to said definition. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/17 11:36 PM |
| 1 | Can someone explain hamstering and how it is a uniquely female trait?the etymology of a word doesnt actually dictate it's usage, your dissembling notwithstanding. In this case, out of fashion is what proponentst of praxeologic economics said and what it actually means is that it is pseudoscience junk rejected by pretty much the entire scientific community. you may wish to review a philosophy which you cant define and which you apparently have an understanding of which is radically at odds with science and philosophy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/17 10:09 PM |
| 1 | Can someone explain hamstering and how it is a uniquely female trait?I liked your overuse of connotation and denotation, overall this post has an attractive, erudite patina. Amidst your declarations of truth there was this nugget. The correct denotation of that word, is more likely something along the lines of "to find or discover" with a main connotation of "finding or discovering via the examination of experience." heuristic isn't a verb (its a noun or adjective), it's denotation isnt ever going to be "to find or discover" But yeah, the real problem is that u/d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/17 07:59 PM |
| 1 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.I understand what it was an example of far better than you. It was absurd for him to suggest that it was somehow symmetrical. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 10:15 PM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.So you can't defend the four witnesses. It's just an arbitrary standard. Good to know. It's telling that you feminists think that schools shouldn't hire behind the same legal standard that the justice system uses which is bad in your opinion and the mra equivalent is for women to have no legal recourse at all when raped. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 04:41 AM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.No it's not, but feel free to think so. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 04:38 AM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.Seriously? Four independent witnesses? Want to walk me through that logic? | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 01:40 AM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.So delightfully droll, you scamp. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 01:36 AM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.Do you know what the term means? It doesn't mean that masculinity is in of itself toxic. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 01:15 AM |
| 0 | I think we should avoid saying male feminists are "white knights trying to get laid". That's as bad as them calling us "neckbeard fedora bronie virgins". I have another idea/theory in trying to understand male feminists.Nope, it's not that we have thought about it and agree with feminism, that's bizarre. :) I find your position interesting, I'm a feminist and not an mra mostly becaus as far as I can tell the mra movement only pays lip service to the idea of equality. I would love to see a movement that actually did want to address problems of gender role and toxic masculinity. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/15 06:55 PM |
| -5 | MRA challenge to fraudulent feminist "hero": show me the proof, and be rid of me forever!I suspect that it isn't so much a risky game as some have suggested as it is a bullshit boast that has about as much chance happening as Oreilly moving out of the country. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/12 09:44 PM |
| 9 | MRA challenge to fraudulent feminist "hero": show me the proof, and be rid of me forever!My problem with this understanding is that the word friend from friend zone comes from one person telling the other person that they just want to be friends. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/12 09:40 PM |
| -20 | MRA challenge to fraudulent feminist "hero": show me the proof, and be rid of me forever!Yall can circle jerk about your fine logical minds all yall want, but, if someone who had the thinking ability to become an MRA goes on to have the thinking ability to believe in bigfoot, I wouldn't be surprised. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/12 09:38 PM |
| 1 | This was posted to Facebok by a group called "Women's Rights News". Judging by the rest of their content, they have no idea of the most important meaning of the comic - that people are too quick to judge everything as so male-dominated, even for opposite reasons.This is why people think mras are misogynists. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/12 03:35 PM |
| 3 | Ask men gold: a poster explains in good detail why so many people don't like feminism.No, you did an interesting reversal of power and obligation though. The point stands, your argument as formulated can be mapped to a guard/prisoner and it is just as valid. That doesn't concern you? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/12 09:43 PM |
| 0 | Ask men gold: a poster explains in good detail why so many people don't like feminism.I love this post so much, girlwriteswhat, I believe that you are a unique beautiful, snow flake on a super long troll, because you can't possibly be as stupid. Truly then according to your reasoning, the millions of prisoners in the us are the most free of us all. They do not have to worry about feeding, nor paying for a place to stay. The poor guards that have a burden to take care of them, if only we could liberate them!!! bonus points to anyone who actually wants to acknowledge the argument i… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/12 09:31 PM |
| 2 | Ask men gold: a poster explains in good detail why so many people don't like feminism.Hag? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/12 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Ask men gold: a poster explains in good detail why so many people don't like feminism.Gene flow is one of the factors in microevolution. There is the defective ccr5 that confers hiv resistance. There are lots of examples of current evolution | /r/MensRights | 04/08/12 04:05 AM |
| -16 | Ask men gold: a poster explains in good detail why so many people don't like feminism.I love this post so much, girlwriteswhat, I believe that you are a unique beautiful, snow flake on a super long troll, because you can't possibly be as stupid. Truly then according to your reasoning, the millions of prisoners in the us are the most free of us all. They do not have to worry about feeding, nor paying for a place to stay. The poor guards that have a burden to take care of them, if only we could liberate them!!! | /r/MensRights | 04/08/12 04:01 AM |
| 1 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.Yeah, mea culpa, I was arguing the point about reciprocal violence but replied to a post about violence. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:57 PM |
| 2 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.No, this shows that women are more likely to be violent, it does not in fact show that women are more likely to start reciprocal violence. This may be the case, but I don't see that information here, although you do indeed claim that it does. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:55 PM |
| 2 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.No worries, I can understand how my usage might bother you as it points out the inherent deficiency in other American dialects. I really feel yall's pain, it must be rough not having a plural you. :) There are many ways in which the south is kind of a backward place particularly in regards to social issues and science that conflicts with a strict biblical worldview, but the word yall isn't one of those deficiencies. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:50 PM |
| 1 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.I think yall should, I like lulz | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:04 PM |
| 3 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.Fwiw, I think this is a reasonable response. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:03 PM |
| 2 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.Again, your study does not show that reciprocal violence is female lead, that came out of your ass. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:03 PM |
| 3 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.Indeed, it is only logical that the stronger and heavier opponent would be forced to injure the weaker and smaller opponent in order to control them. Oh wait, that isn't really logical at all, its mostly just stupid. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.Maybe, but this study doesn't show that. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:00 PM |
| 2 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.I'm not just speculating, I am drawing a reasonable inference from a fact that I think no one here would dispute: in modern society men have been conditioned to in general not strike women. It follows then, that most men are going to be unlikely to respond to violence. Women are not similarly conditioned making it reasonable to infer that the group that is mutually violent is mostly instigated by males. In that female initiated violence will be more likely to result non reciprocal violence than … | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 11:00 PM |
| -6 | Three studies on patterns of domestic violence that show domestic violence to be female lead, and that male on female non-recriprocal domestic violence is the least common configuration - Aggregate sample size approx. 25,000.But these studies don't show that it is female lead, men may very well be more likely to start violence and if women are more likely to respond with violence because they do not have a prohibition against striking the opposite sex you would get this kind of breakdown. Note, I don't know that this is the case, but these studies hardly show what yall seem to think they show. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 04:11 PM |
| 12 | To ALL MARRIED MEN -- listen up, always , always keep a stash of cash at your parents home, in a locked box , with some of your most important papers and most of all , gold, silver or any valuables . No matter what you think, it will be important just in case ..I can honestly say that about my wife and not about my mother. :) | /r/MensRights | 16/07/12 06:00 PM |
| 1 | The picture that raised my consciousness about mens rightsI liked your jumping off, but you should note the picture shows the man lifting 40 times as much. Is it your position that men in fact do 40 times the amount of work that women do? | /r/MensRights | 08/07/12 04:28 PM |
| -7 | My wife and I attended a communication course, and we received the man-bad-woman-victim messaging. I confronted the speakers. This was their response.I am not sure how much accuracy you should really expect from "biblical principles of effective communication", did you find the section on how to use a burning bush to communicate unhelpful? Did you and your so not try to communicate only in "tongues?" How about through the holy spirit? | /r/MensRights | 01/07/12 12:34 AM |
| 1 | Men are victims of reverse sexism, according to new book. David Benatar argues that "more boys drop out of school, fewer men earn degrees, more men die younger, more are incarcerated" and that the issue is so under-researched it has become the prejudice that dare not speak its name.Yeah, I made the statement mocking this position. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/12 03:32 AM |
| 1 | Men are victims of reverse sexism, according to new book. David Benatar argues that "more boys drop out of school, fewer men earn degrees, more men die younger, more are incarcerated" and that the issue is so under-researched it has become the prejudice that dare not speak its name.Yeah that's why more guys commit murder and get murdered they're making a political, social statement. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/12 03:31 AM |
| 1 | American Association of University Women state women earn less than men. Study ignores occupation metric that explains differenceI will note your concession here, that you in fact did conflate data sets and did not in fact show what you were attempting to. I appreciate your grace, sir. A lesser man may very well have completely ignored the point with a red herring. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/12 04:57 PM |
| 1 | American Association of University Women state women earn less than men. Study ignores occupation metric that explains differenceAll the more reason to not hire them and or pay them less. It seems absurd to me that men think that they should be paid as much as women when they are involved in such a disproportionate percentage of workplace mishaps | /r/MensRights | 14/05/12 04:54 PM |
| -5 | Men are victims of reverse sexism, according to new book. David Benatar argues that "more boys drop out of school, fewer men earn degrees, more men die younger, more are incarcerated" and that the issue is so under-researched it has become the prejudice that dare not speak its name.I can only assume that it is the result of different lifestyle choices that these men and boy's are making. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/12 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Woman awarded $50K Monthly Alimony While Having Sex with Her LawyerIts also not recent. It happened a decade ago, so not exactly news. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/12 06:10 PM |
| 7 | Got ostracized by the overwhelming majority of female friends for refusing to respect women solely based on genderI also have never seen this. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:39 PM |
| 1 | Why do bigoted feminists and white knights call the Mens Rights Movements a "privileged straight white cis-mens rights" movement?Also, captain makeshitup, you should really read the fine print on this poll, it was about a middle school giving out birthcontrol which you know isn't really the same thing, now is it? | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 10:18 PM |
| 1 | Why do bigoted feminists and white knights call the Mens Rights Movements a "privileged straight white cis-mens rights" movement?"Many of the fan theories which make their way into Fanfic seek to "fix" something the writer believes to be wrong with the source. The fans usually put a lot more thought into this than the show's writers ever did (though show writers have gotten a lot more attentive in recent years, primarily because of the growth of this kind of fan activity). They often come up with answers to questions that either make not a whit of difference in the end, or are more fun without an answer than with. " from … | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 10:14 PM |
| 0 | American Association of University Women state women earn less than men. Study ignores occupation metric that explains differenceFrom aauw, you know the actual study "Yet not all of the gap could be “explained away.” After accounting for college major, occupation, industry, sector, hours worked, workplace flexibility, experience, educational attainment, enrollment status, GPA, institution selectivity, age, race/ethnicity, region, marital status, and number of children, a 5 percent difference in the earnings of male and female college graduates one year after graduation was still unexplained. A similar analysis of full-tim… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 09:41 PM |
| -2 | American Association of University Women state women earn less than men. Study ignores occupation metric that explains differenceFor your nifty math that proves the pay disparity is a result of hours worked, you are comparing hours worked of all people in america vs yearly pay for full time workers, you should note that these are not the same data sets. So you can't really use one to explain the other. Full time men might very well work more hours than women but you don't actually prove that. Also, your own source finds that when all things that they can think of to account for are accounted for 4 to 7 percent is left ove… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 09:39 PM |
| -1 | Why do bigoted feminists and white knights call the Mens Rights Movements a "privileged straight white cis-mens rights" movement?Wankery as in a wank or fan post hoc rationalization of some bit of lore in a universe. Like fans explaining that the kessel run is a series of jumps and so it makes sense to say you can do the kessel run in so many parsecs because the "faster" ship can do it in few jumps and more folding of space so less parsecs. Its a wank. I am saying you are making shit up. Perhaps you could show me where the republican men don't care about things like contraception but republican women do. You could also qu… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/12 01:43 AM |
| -4 | Why do bigoted feminists and white knights call the Mens Rights Movements a "privileged straight white cis-mens rights" movement?Um, no, its judging a book by its content ie the laws that the party champions and passes. I must admit that I am impressed by you shifting the blame of the war on women onto women. that is some impressive wankery right there. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/12 06:10 PM |
| 1 | Why do bigoted feminists and white knights call the Mens Rights Movements a "privileged straight white cis-mens rights" movement?Perhaps, but if I were to say that the Republican Party is the party of rich white old men, pointing to Michael Steele or Herman Cain won't really invalidate that point, now would it? Also, could someone point to the members here in the subreddit who belong to SIF? | /r/MensRights | 07/04/12 02:10 PM |
| 6 | Judge: Jail for Facebook rant..."he blasted the situation and the judicial system he believed wronged him."That is definitely fucked up. I don't always agree with posts in mr, but his is truly a fucked up situation. Its the equivalent of sneaking into a party and then getting pissed off at what you overhear and then getting a judge to force your husband to spend months apologizing for it. and forcing him to pay for your attorneys when you address the court. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/12 12:00 AM |
| 1 | Feminist "athiest" Stephanie Zvan has published a false claim relating rape against the entire men's movementYou made a positive statement that you cannot prove a negative, I only have to show a single example to prove that your statement was false. You didn't say it is impossible to prove a non-simple negative. This is called shifting goalposts. Furthermore, I think most atheists who have thought about it recognize that they are only strong atheists towards certain god concepts and weak atheists to others, then there is the induction. All fairy claims that I have heard so far have been false upon exam… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 03:56 PM |
| 0 | Feminist "athiest" Stephanie Zvan has published a false claim relating rape against the entire men's movementSome forms of buddhism can be considered atheist. Thats a little different then your statement, which is not surprising as you seem to get things only partially right. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/12 06:00 PM |
| -1 | Feminist "athiest" Stephanie Zvan has published a false claim relating rape against the entire men's movementYou can prove a negative. There are no blue crayons in this box. I could show that each crayon in the box is a color other than blue. Some negatives are practically unprovable, but with some thought and some induction we can prove some negatives. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/12 05:58 PM |
| 2 | Nothing new, but I'm sick to death of being called a man simply because I support Men's RightsNo, I don't think anyone else does. XX is the standard genetic identifier of females humans and XY for males, yes there are exceptions. shrug | /r/MensRights | 18/02/12 05:33 PM |
| -2 | Angry people at Harvard can't stand anyone defending the falsely accusedMaybe she went through her transcript and looked at all the classes that talked about those subjects at all. Maybe she is a psych minor. between 15 and 20 classes out of over 8000 in their catalog that have something to do with "sexual assault, abuse, dating, and other relationship issues", that sounds unreasonable to you? You don't think that Harvard has that many classes that actually talk about such things? Depending on her focus I could easily think of alot of history and lit classes that wo… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 09:32 AM |
| -1 | Angry people at Harvard can't stand anyone defending the falsely accusedContext, if you do actually have three degrees you should be able to grasp it. I have spent 57 hours in the last three years would lend itself to your interpretation. She said that she had spent 57 hours of the past three academic years, in that context hour means something different then 60 minutes. I would expect someone as learned as you claim to be to be able to grasp this oh so subtle point. As to my own academic situation, you know nothing about me. You don't know that I delayed school bec… | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 09:19 PM |
| -6 | Angry people at Harvard can't stand anyone defending the falsely accusedYall can downvote this one as well, wont change the fact that surfnsound is making a retarded point. 90 academic hours in 3 years for a full load. so 57 would be almost 2/3. So she has spent almost 2 thirds of the last 3 years studying this | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 03:40 AM |
| -13 | Angry people at Harvard can't stand anyone defending the falsely accusedits academic, retard. 12 hrs a semester is full time so 24 would be for a year. 15 hrs a semester is a full load. so 57 hours out of 90 is a good bit. This lesson brought to you by the letter i, as in isn't it ironic when a dipshit makes fun of something and shows his own ignorance. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 02:23 AM |
| -9 | 6-year-old boy falls & breaks leg and gets a concussion at school, teacher tells him "You’re a big boy, I can't carry you" and forces him to crawl back several hundred yards back to the school building, doesn't call ambulance. Can you guess the teacher's sex?But that isn't what happened here. ‘You’re a big boy — I can’t carry you" the mom says the teacher says. Maybe the teacher literally could not carry the child. Nowhere in the story does it suggest the teachers told the boy to manup. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/12 04:39 PM |
| 3 | 6-year-old boy falls & breaks leg and gets a concussion at school, teacher tells him "You’re a big boy, I can't carry you" and forces him to crawl back several hundred yards back to the school building, doesn't call ambulance. Can you guess the teacher's sex?Perhaps, but I think people do exhort children to be a big boy or girl when they want them to not cry or do something that they consider adult. The sex may be irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/12 04:37 PM |
| 0 | 6-year-old boy falls & breaks leg and gets a concussion at school, teacher tells him "You’re a big boy, I can't carry you" and forces him to crawl back several hundred yards back to the school building, doesn't call ambulance. Can you guess the teacher's sex?Not a concussion, but a bruise, and the teacher most likely didn't know about the fracture. Furthermore, the accusation about having to crawl comes from an upset parent, hardly the most reliable source. I know some of you want to believe, but this doesn't help. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/12 04:35 PM |
| 3 | 6-year-old boy falls & breaks leg and gets a concussion at school, teacher tells him "You’re a big boy, I can't carry you" and forces him to crawl back several hundred yards back to the school building, doesn't call ambulance. Can you guess the teacher's sex?This totally makes sense, you can see it in the massive numbers of firings that happen every year when girls get injured at school. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/12 04:32 PM |
| 1 | "Time to man up, real men do this,or don't do that..."Not really. As a sex maybe but as a gender role, to be a man does carry with it some societally defined baggage. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/11 08:14 PM |
| 1 | I am fucking tired of being perceived as a pervert for being attracted to women and their bodiesDeloreon, Thank you for your comments in the thread. Last week I was talking to my wife about these sorts of issues. I came to say something similar, but I found that you said what I wanted to say only so much more eloquent. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/11 11:02 PM |
| 0 | HuffPo columnist thinks women deserve lifetime alimonySeriously misleading title. Some women, like those who have raised children and been married for 40 years. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/11 07:56 PM |
| 1 | HuffPo columnist thinks women deserve lifetime alimonyAgreed. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/11 07:56 PM |
| 3 | "Claims that women scientists suffer discrimination in these arenas rest on a set of studies undergirding policies and programs aimed at remediation. More recent and robust empiricism, however, fails to support assertions of discrimination in these domains."You know its posts like this that make people think that every mra is a woman hater, right? | /r/MensRights | 13/08/11 06:42 PM |
| 0 | I'm taking a course on "Society and Gender" this fall. Give me some recommended reading to prepare myself."I consider myself very pro gender equality, which is why I'm very anti feminism. I don't understand how anyone can think that gender equality is going to come about through a movement with a gender in the name" So we should also think that equality shouldn't come through The Men's Rights movement, after all it has men right there in the title. Masculism is spelled Men's Rights. I don't have a problem with men's rights, but then I don't have a problem with feminism either. I must have missed all… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 04:43 AM |
| 3 | I'm taking a course on "Society and Gender" this fall. Give me some recommended reading to prepare myself.Having to learn about different kinds of peoples, that is incredibly sickening. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 04:38 AM |
| -5 | I'm taking a course on "Society and Gender" this fall. Give me some recommended reading to prepare myself.OP, I applaud you being progender equality and I too think there is a problem with a movement with a gender in the title. Like Men's rights. Seriously, are you that incapable of critical thinking that you bitch about feminism because its focus on women at a men's rights forum? hypocrite much? | /r/MensRights | 11/08/11 05:16 PM |
| 20 | The Today Show had a segment this morning about the Psycho ex-wife blog. They made the husband the bad guy.""He may be right legally, but he’s not right, in terms of the family," she told Matt Lauer. "Because at the end of the day, when a couple gets divorced you know the fallout for children. And the only way to try to help to be the healthiest for them is to preserve two good parents, even if they don’t want to be together. But it’s your job to help say to some degree, 'Your mom’s an okay person and loves you.' "" From link in op. I absolutely hate this kind of shit. If one of your parents are shit… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 02:10 PM |
| 1 | female makes a blog post about how tumblr is okay with objectifying men but not women. "feminist" respond with telling her that its an okay double standard because women are opposed.If by utilize critical thinking skills you mean make stuff then yeah. Sexual restrictions on women have been around in just about every society that we know of (I would say every but there could be a counter example that I do not know of) That yall are upvoting someone who is bitching about someone else's use of puritans when they didn't, that just makes me sad. Also, if you insult my critical thinking skills again, my lulz/ironometer may explode, so please have mercy. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/11 09:15 PM |
| 2 | female makes a blog post about how tumblr is okay with objectifying men but not women. "feminist" respond with telling her that its an okay double standard because women are opposed.Defly: one who makes misogynous joke as he bitches about feminism. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 01:43 PM |
| -5 | female makes a blog post about how tumblr is okay with objectifying men but not women. "feminist" respond with telling her that its an okay double standard because women are opposed."It’s the large-scale objectification of women, and the way women are treated by society in general, that I find problems with. if a man wants to find a woman attractive, hurray for them. And if a woman wants to say “that dude is hot,” go for it. Yes, in a perfect world, we would only judge each other on personal merits. But in the mean time, I think it’s ok to say “I would do everything to that actor who played Thor.”" From the actual post and it doesn't say what yall seem to think it says. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 01:40 PM |
| -3 | female makes a blog post about how tumblr is okay with objectifying men but not women. "feminist" respond with telling her that its an okay double standard because women are opposed.Could you quote the part about puritan, because that word is not found on the linked post. I didn't recall it and of course neither did the find function. Or perhaps you are responding to something that is only found in your head like the other posters | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 01:39 PM |
| 0 | Humble Pie For The Homely - you should be pleased that awkward elevator guy approached you at all.Show me one example of her calling elevator guy a rapist. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/11 01:54 AM |
| 0 | Rebecca Watson is a Silly Twit: Introducing the “Skeptical Girl” MemeWhen did Watson call herself a victim? | /r/MensRights | 12/07/11 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Rebecca Watson is a Silly Twit: Introducing the “Skeptical Girl” MemeIts cute that you say that as being sexualized is one of her complaints and of course you probably haven't fucked anything other than your hand in quite sometime. :) Its like double irony. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/11 03:52 PM |
| 0 | Rebecca Watson is a Silly Twit: Introducing the “Skeptical Girl” MemeNo, but you might make the woman uncomfortable when you follow her onto an elevator and proposition her, so yeah, don't do that. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/11 03:50 PM |
| -1 | Humble Pie For The Homely - you should be pleased that awkward elevator guy approached you at all.Good thing Watson didn't do that. Rif | /r/MensRights | 11/07/11 01:54 AM |
| 0 | How Rebecca Watson's response to Dawkins imparts a lesson on feminismThe guy followed her onto an elevator and propositioned her at 4 am, that is weird. I am sure you mean well, but I do speak to women and they don't think that 80 percent of men are creepy. If you feel that way, is it possible you are doing creepy shit and women are responding to it? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/11 09:49 PM |
| 1 | Elevator guy incident and aftermath is indicative of a larger problem: The dismissal of seeking equality and the importance of empowering female privileges.So not hitting on women in elevators or when they feel uncomfortable=second class citizen? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/11 12:34 AM |
| -4 | How Rebecca Watson's response to Dawkins imparts a lesson on feminismMaybe yall are just little, but being a big guy I expect to intimidate people around me. I would never in a million years follow a woman onto an elevator from a bar and ask her back to my room for coffee at 4 am. Because I know that being in a small space with me can be intimidating to someone much smaller than me. Watson said basically, if you want the skeptic community to be more welcoming to women, maybe you should tell its members to not be creepy towards women, this is not some sort of craz… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/11 12:06 AM |
| 1 | How Rebecca Watson's response to Dawkins imparts a lesson on feminismThis is so over the top I suspect it is landoverian in nature, still. Hegel died in 1831, Raphael in 1500s, women have had political and social agency for a few scant decades. TLDR: your argument is retarded. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/11 12:02 AM |
| 0 | Support Richard DawkinsSo you think its cool to follow women into elevators and proposition them? You don't think that's creepy at all? | /r/MensRights | 08/07/11 07:02 PM |
| 0 | Support Richard DawkinsDawkin's basic message was one of false equivalence. Let us use his argument in regards to skepticism. When there are millions of people in the world starving to death why should we worry about the separation of church and state. I am a metaphysical naturalist and I like Dawkin's writings about religion to some degree and his stuff about biology even more(I am an old bio major) but he is completing missing the point here and his response was fucking stupid. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/11 02:57 PM |
| 1 | Its amazing the difference when its a feminist who kills herself in comparison to the "selfish" act of a man who is pushed to the edge and kills himselfHe talked about the need for armed revolution and molotov cocktails, how is that anything else then a call for terrorism? I don't think he was a monster for slapping his child, I do think that slapping your kid hard enough to make her bleed is probably a sign that you could use some counseling. Which the court wanted him to do. He was so obviously disturbed. I am not sure what you mean about accountability, he is dead, accountability really isn't an issue. If he were alive i would hope that he c… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/11 11:11 PM |
| 0 | Its amazing the difference when its a feminist who kills herself in comparison to the "selfish" act of a man who is pushed to the edge and kills himselfDid she leave terrorist instructions as well on proper molotov cocktail constructions? did she slap her young child hard enough to make her bleed? I feel for Thomas Ball I think he was profoundly disturbed and the system failed to help him with his obvious (in hindsight) mental problems. Apples and oranges | /r/MensRights | 28/06/11 10:50 PM |
| 5 | Would everyone here agree that the creeping government control of pregnancies and criminalization of terminated pregnancies is scary orwellian shit?"There is adequate scientific and philosophical justification for the view that personhood begins at conception that it's disingenuous to chalk up the entire pro-life movement to religious oppression." This is a positive claim, you do have the burden of proof for you positive claim, that is how burden of proof works. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/11 03:59 PM |
| 2 | My college class recently discussed student expectations. Most of the women expected to have a good career, marry a man who earned same or more, share housework equally, not sacrifice her career for his. Have children around 30, have the choice to work or stay home after kids.You know whats even better? Not having kids in the first place, its like instead of looking forward to being 50 my wife and I look forward to right now. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/11 10:51 PM |
| 3 | My college class recently discussed student expectations. Most of the women expected to have a good career, marry a man who earned same or more, share housework equally, not sacrifice her career for his. Have children around 30, have the choice to work or stay home after kids.baconoclock is probably just weak in logic. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/11 06:38 PM |
| 3 | My college class recently discussed student expectations. Most of the women expected to have a good career, marry a man who earned same or more, share housework equally, not sacrifice her career for his. Have children around 30, have the choice to work or stay home after kids.seriously look up ad hominem, you might argue that dorky2's post is some other logical fallacy but its not an adhom | /r/MensRights | 27/03/11 06:37 PM |
| 2 | Katy mom accused of sending nude photos to her friend's teenage son | khou.com | khou.com Local NewsYeah, its skeevy nonethless, I know GA the age of consent is 16, typically states add a mitigating circumstance for statutory rape when they are close in age. But lots of states are 16. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/10 08:12 PM |
| 8 | Katy mom accused of sending nude photos to her friend's teenage son | khou.com | khou.com Local NewsWhat boggles my mind in cases like these is that in many places the age of consent is 16 so it would be legal for her to fuck him but not send him those pictures. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/10 07:00 AM |
| 1 | If a close friend came to you and claimed she was raped, would you believe her?Yes I would believe her, and depending on circumstances, I might very well take hte matter into my own hands. The difference here of course is hat if its someone we know we are more likely to be able to judge the veracity of the statement. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/10 04:55 PM |
| 4 | Why men should ignore woman telling them what they wantI am not particularly impressed by someone who is "skeptical" of evolution. It makes me doubt anything they have to say. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/10 05:21 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter