TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bigblackcuddleslut Archive

View 2 posts and 54 comments by bigblackcuddleslut on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

bigblackcuddleslut/r/seduction10/10/15 03:04 AM
2

bigblackcuddleslut/r/seduction17/10/15 11:28 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Guys an idiot. Tinder, and especially bumble now(much better imho) has been nothing but free pussy. You meet interesting people you never would have met otherwise and if they are cool, you have a good time. If they aren't, you get a consequence free chance to practice your social skills or just talk/understand the perspective of someone else. Dude has 100% the wrong mindset. Shit post. Edit: bumble not humble
/r/seduction10/02/20 05:54 AM
-5

I'm in the KKK and I'm gonna do Somthing big is not a threat. Yes. We all know what she meant. Maybe law enforcement would have wasted their time looking into her. Maybe a prosecutor would have wasted his time trying to prosecute the case. Maybe a competent lawyer couldn't convince a jury or a judge she deserved anything more than a slap on the wrist. If she had just kept her stupid fucking mouth shut. She most likely would have been fine.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 02:24 AM
1

If she was smart enough to keep her fucking mouth shut, all that likely would have happened is maybe.... Law enforcement would have asked to ask her questions. And she could have said no. But she's too dumb to just shit the fuck up.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 02:21 AM
-1

I'm sorry. It's not like this is grappling. You are allowed to hit. A simple elbow would have broken that little girls ribs. I don't think I've met a girl I couldn't hurt just by squeezing there arms hard. Let alone not unwrap them from around my neck. I would feel you if he was just a random drunk dude. I could see being taken by surprise by someone who new what they were doing and you were drunk and having a good time. But he is literally a bouncer.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 07:34 AM
1

My point was that's not really true. Men aren't taught to not go out by themselves. Overall women are far more likely to be victimized or robbed assualted, raped or taken advantage of in a violent fashion. Men are far more likely to be in violent encounters; and that's mostly their fault. The statistics can be made to tell a different story. Women aren't comitting offenses but are being victimized nearly as often.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 06:04 AM
6

How is this even a problem. You are the older accomplished guy that still throws down. Your old. Own it.
/r/seduction10/09/17 03:56 AM
1

2% of the population every year?!?! So every 50 years a number equal to the entire population was a victim of sexual assault. Damn, even I didn't think it was that high.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:27 AM
1

You are soooooooo smart and clever.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:21 PM
1

I know. I will try.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:14 PM
1

Bye :-)
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:08 PM
1

1 day I hope to be better.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:07 PM
1

Way not to answer the questions lol. You win dude. I'm an idiot.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:01 PM
1

Lol. What's the difference between an opinion and a fact? What's the difference between something that can't be objectively proven and something that can? When are the two former ever lies?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:55 PM
1

What claim are you talking about specifically?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:22 PM
0

we can't objectively measure which sex is subject to more severe forms of discrimination. Well, I'm waiting for the objective measurement. So far all you done is list a bunch of complaints ( many of which are quite weak ) and claimed that proves your point of view. Saying it's futile to argue is the same as saying it can't be objectively measured. That's the definition of objectively measured.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:19 PM
1

Lol Overall On the whole the final tally so to speak may be rather subjective. You are a funny little troll. What part of IMHO Implys objective truth
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:26 PM
1

But it is cut and dried that women have it worse always. You clearly haven't been paying attention to me. It's not.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:20 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights09/09/17 06:33 PM
0

O yes it is. It so so unbelievably biased as to make no since. This I will not argue at all. I'm also not arguing that women have it worse Full Stop Period. So I'm not offended.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:29 PM
1

What was that again incorrect implication. The Sexual assault and domestic violence catagories make up 20% of all those crimes. Using some simple math, assuming women account for all of them, and removing them, the 2015 statistics change to 42% women and 58% men. But we know women don't account for 100% of them anyway. So what is your point??
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:28 PM
1

Yes. All violent crimes. I don't dispute the point you are more likely to be murdered as a man. I just don't think it means all that much in the context of this conversation.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:16 PM
1

One U.S. Department of Justice study on criminal victimization, showing the prevalence of violent crime was 50% men and 50% women in 2014 and and 46% men and 54% women 2015. Specifically page 13 table 10.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:05 PM
1

The debate about "who has it worse" is futile. Thanks for finally agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:53 PM
1

No I'm not. I'm saying I think they do but I certainly can't prove it Full Stop Period. Men have it worse in some ways. women have it worse in some ways. IMHO I think women have it worse overall.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:49 PM
1

Actually, more women go to college than men. My point was it's not a cut and dry men's lives suck more period. Full Stop.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:48 PM
0

I'm merely pointing out averages that strongly suggest Average's, strongly suggest, 3% statistics? It's the rule rather than the exception. But it's your choice. You marring someone who doesn't work or want to work is your choice. I'ts not just womens mating habits it's also Mens matting habits. White males suffer higher rates of murder than black women. They are also sentenced to on average 60 percent longer prison sentences than black women. If you're okay with that that's fine. I'm not becaus…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 03:15 AM
2

Do I want to have a fight over who is killed/assulted more through no fault of their own. No! Not a fight I really want to have mostly because it requires to much nuance for reddit. Yes, If you break it down by pure murder men win. If you look at all reported violent crimes( anything involving force or the threat of force), it bounces around 50%. If you look at other metrics, you start to see it has more to do with economic status than gender. While males are incredibly unlikely to be murdered. …
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:59 AM
0

You changed the subject. I was talking about boys being discriminated against in school. Well the website was so what are you talking about? If you think the leading cause of death for young men is no big deal I don't know what to say. You're one sick puppy. First [It's the second leading cause for teenagers ( 8 per 100,000 ) behind accidents ( 33 per 100,000 )] ( http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2016/suicide-replaces-homicide-second-leading-cause-death-among-us-teens.aspx). So i think i…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:38 AM
1

None. Statistics aside, I know far more women than men who have been assulted. And I could find plenty of sources to back up my experience. Now there are a lot of statistics and a lot of controversy surounding them. That site however did some funny math and tried to make something look far worse than it was. Do I want to have a fight over who is killed/assulted more through no fault of their own. No! Does that site prove anything. No! If someone is gonna go all "Full Stop.", and then post some B…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:45 AM
1

Ok, I confused you with OP. I guess I am an idiot. None the less.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:37 AM
-9

lol what? Are you saying that eg only a "tiny percentage" of boys go to school? Should I respond to that. Suicide effects less than 1% of 1%of the population. War deaths less than 3% during the greatest war ever. Half of your statistics are complete bull in this context. Sorry. And you previously claimed that I had a lack of empathy? Claiming that being forced to die in war is "no big deal"? That's pants on head retarded. Even today men are still obligated to sign up for selective service before…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:35 AM
4

Irrelevant to the point straw man bullshit intentionally or.. you're an idiot. Um, you are claiming men have it worst. So you post a statistic that accounts for less than 3% of all men and you call the point irrelevant. I guess I am an idiot. I.. don't... are you trolling here or are you being serious? Are you a flat earther? ...... I have no response lol. You should be embarrassed to express such shallow, poorly thought out baseless opinions you've plucked out of thin air. Same.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:10 AM
3

O so he meant men on averge have a harder life than women on average. That would be different. The whole Full Stop thing threw me for a loop. Almost as if he was saying all women have it easy and all men have it hard.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 12:46 AM
7

By most metrics. Your "source" is clearly biased and in this context hilarious. It proves my point. You have no ability to put yourself in the shoes of someone else. The idea you think that represents "most" is laughable. But fine, lets look at these things. -Most of the statistics pertain only to a tiny percentage of people ever: 80% of men die in war, yet WW2 only killed 3% of all people. I've heard estimates at 1.6% in recorded history and around 2% for the last 600 years. So why do I care? H…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 12:43 AM
33

I disagree with this entire post. Problem number one. Men face harder lives than women. Full stop. By what metric? This represents an inability to see things from any point of view other than your own. It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man. So why the Full stop. Problem two. Society, and often women, don't accept men should be allowed to equally vocalise their feelings. I'n my experience, I've never had a women put me down for…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:30 PM
3

It didn't used to be this way.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:35 AM
4

Thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:29 AM
-4

Why are you so obsessed with the hyper-literal interpretation of the comic? Do you sincerely believe the artist was trying to claim women do no work at all? Yes. This comic makes perfect since to you, and those who are like minded. And I understood the point even when I asked the question. I miss the content that showed stuck up entitled cunts being stuck up entitled cunts. How do you think it comes off to a women who believes she is being paid less for doing the same job at the same hours for a…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:09 AM
0

........................................................ I'd like to live in a meritocracy. Meaning everyone was paid based solely on the work they did. That aside. I am not tring to advocate for the wage gap. I was just trying to illustrate what a shit comic this is.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:42 AM
2

This is the first response that sounds resonable. And I get and understand your point of view. But do you not see how someone might see a female horse doing nothing next to a male horse doing everything and take it to mean Women should get paid less because they do less work. It's a shit comic.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:37 AM
-15

I've seen a number of videos and articles that claim "$.77/$1.00 for the exact same job" which is demonstrably false. My point is; whether that claim is false or not is another story. And yes, I agree that particular claim is false. Although I've never seen a reputable source claim that number was adjusted for occupation/ time worked/ ect. It depicts women making less because she's not doing any work. It has no context. It is a blanket statement. How did you put it..... The comic is attempting t…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:31 AM
4

It's pretty obvious that you're just going to support your narrative regardless of the evidence. Really, because I really am not. I was just asking if you thought women should be paid less because they do less work. I was asking that because that's what your comic depicted. And you replied with a bunch of stats and logical arguments that appear to be trying to argue that is in fact the case lol. I have no horse in this race. I was just supprised to see that kind of statement in r/pussypassdenied…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:10 AM
-3

All that aside; look at the comic lol. I interpret it as meaning women should be paid less because they do less work. I'm not in here trying to white knight or convince anyone the gender gap exists or any such thing. The comic popped up in my feed; and it struck me as wtf because the only reasonable way to interpret it; as far as I can tell; is "women should be paid less because they do less work". Which as a side note, seems to actually be your point lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:23 AM
-36

I've never seen anyone try to argue a female receptionist should make as much as a Alaskan Crab FisherMAN. Seems like a strawman to me. And a bad one at that. Every gender gap comment I've every seen or heard anyone make was for women doing the same job as men. I have seen multuple studies( right or wrong ) towards the same end. In any sensible context, I interpret that comic as meaning women should be paid less because they do less work.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:17 AM
-44

So women should be paid less, because they do less work?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:03 AM
0

compulsive liar To call Hillary a serial lier in comparison to Trump is laughable. It doesn't even compute. Nearly everything that comes out of the man's mouth is a lie. Possible criminal Again, multiple bipartisan groups have said there is no evidence Hillary has done anything illegal. Multiple bipartisan groups have said there is HUGE amounts of evidence Trump has engaged in illegal behavior. It's just always made more since to settle or there hasn't been enough evidence to take a billionaire …
/r/MensRights17/10/16 11:21 PM
-3

If you vote for Hitler; you are a Nazi. At what point do you begin correlating the beliefs and actions of a candidate with that of his supporters. If Trump said "Blacks are lazy criminals"; does that make his supporters racist. If no, I respectfully disagree with you. If yes, well, I don't see how you can call all such correlations hyperbolic generalization but we can talk about it if you'd like. Edit, I can only assume from the downvotes that those in this sub value being able to support candid…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:36 PM
1

There are three possibilities. 1. She's not interested at all. If that's the case who cares. I know that's hard to take to heart but it's important that you do. So what who cares; it doesn't reflect on you necessarily. 2. She is but not right now. She has a boyfriend or just got over a breakup or whatever. Not your time. Again see above. Or 3. she is and you get a number and some play or whatever. What's important to most girls is you are willing to put your self out there. At the end of the day…
/r/seduction06/02/16 07:38 AM
1

“Never forget what you are, for surely the world will not. Make it your strength. Then it can never be your weakness. Armour yourself in it, and it will never be used to hurt you.”
/r/seduction28/11/15 08:54 PM
1

To add to this, isn't being able to admit something embarrassing in a plain mater of fact it is what it is manner the definition of confidence and attractiveness. Plus I bet if after a couple of times of just admitting your a nervous blusher, you'd stop being so nervous.
/r/seduction19/10/15 01:04 AM
1

You know that is a great point that I just never really thought of. I'm a really self consciousness person. It's something I'm just starting to get over. Thanks.
/r/seduction10/10/15 04:12 PM
1

There is a good deal of medical science that shows having forskin drastically increases the chances of infection and cancer. I'm NOT TRYING to advocate for circumcision. I'm circumcised. I don't know if I'd want my kids to be circumcised. If you gave me the choice to go back in time and change the decision made for me I'd chose what I got now. But your questions is beyond retarded. Way to not not have a reasonable discussion about anything.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:16 PM
2

Im not tring to advocate for circumci, but everything I've read seems to indicate that's just not true.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 07:05 PM
-3

My understanding is, and if I'm wrong I'd love to be corrected on it. Back in the day when one could easily die from an infection; having an uncircumcised penis was a major liability. If it ever did get infected, best case, you spend weeks in enormous pain unable to work and help provide for your family. Worst case, it gets so bad you have to cut it off, and then you die anyway.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter