TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bigmanbeats Archive

View 2 posts and 69 comments by bigmanbeats on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Finn is hardly a secondary character. And you're ignoring the fact that the cast of Rogue one is OVERWHELMINGLY male.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:42 PM
1

Ok, how about Finn, Poe Dameron, Cassian Andor, Galen Erso, Bodhi Rook, Chirrut Imwe, or Baze Malbus?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:53 AM
1

This seems universal with heros regardless of gender though. I don't know about you but I don't have a nuclear powered Ironman suit.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:50 AM
1

How about Luke Skywalker?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:16 AM
–

The irony of you using this phrase in your post title to try and prove that you aren't sexist/racist is laughable. You're ridiculous OP
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:41 AM
–

Milo Yiannopoulos has really let himself go.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:11 PM
–

This to me is the most legitimate question in this AMA and I don't understand why it isn't both answered and at the top.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:27 AM
–

I think what he meant was the idea that "these instances you are describing are rare", in other words, he was asking for proof of how often a man has consensual sex with a woman while both of them are intoxicated and the man goes to jail. It's somewhat ironic because I imagine that he unquestioningly believes the 1 in 4 statistic, but then demands proof the opposite way. I believe while his intentions were misplaced, what he was asking for is a fair thing to ask for. We wouldn't want to produce …
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:30 PM
–

After you heard about the 3rd divorce I'm curious what made you think it would work out with this woman.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:37 AM
–

So most Black people you know liked Jim Crow, segregation, separate bathrooms/toilets, gerrymandering, housing discrimination, employment discrimination and systematic institutionalized marginalization?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:46 PM
–

I doubt you will find many Black people that would want to rewind time to the 1950's when it comes to racial equality in America. Likewise, is it really that hard to understand why women might not buy your argument that 'things were better way back when'?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:37 PM
–

This is not a great argument, and honestly the argument that many in the south used to support slavery and Jim Crow. "way back when people were happier with Blacks being Blacks and Whites being Whites. The majority would be happier then they are now if it was that way again."
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:34 PM
-2

|Like I said, it's difficult to find honest debate here. Because you don't want one and aren't seeking one. |Anyway, I'd better not argue anymore. The pollution coming out of your mouth is poisoning me. Point proven by me.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:19 AM
-4

Like I said, it's difficult to find honest debate here. You are absolutely cherry picking issues in order to create a false sense of oppression. That's the chief complaint about feminism on this thread, and I see it as classic projection. As Americans, we have an unprecedented level of personal freedoms. We are so free, we pick problems like being circumcised to complain about. It's incredible! You may personally have been fucked in the ass by a dildo, but lets not make the same mistake of moder…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:59 AM
-7

I don't think you'll find a great deal of honest debate in your post but here goes. The so-called 'men's right's movement' is a complicated bag of people. I'll be the first to admit that there's a lot of horseshit people in the movement. There are the "why isn't there a white entertainment television" group of folks here, who cry reverse discrimination, but absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge the reality of male privilege. They genuinely want to equate being circumcised with the fact that we at one…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:31 PM
5

Having a Black male president hasn't stopped racial violence and exploitation of Black males in this country. Nor has having a Caucasian male president stopped society from exploiting poor Caucasian males. Having a president who looks like you doesn't guarantee that s/he will have your best interests at heart. Every president in American history has been a male. So does that entitle men not to talk about men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:14 PM
5

I find the issue of journalistic integrity to be somewhat ironic in terms of fox news. Their news channel is about one hour of actual news and 23 hours of journalistic editorializing with a clear conservative slant. I happen to believe this particular editorializing has some legitimacy to it, but lets not pretend fox news is concerned with not slanting their views.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:16 PM
0

It didn't seem as if the request was gender specific. More of a request of everyone who attended the conference.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:52 AM
-1

I'm not sure how this is an MRA issue. Could you help me understand?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:08 AM
–

I'm not sure how this is an MRA issue. Could you help me understand?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:05 AM
7

"She wants me to treat her like a princess but refuses to treat me like a medieval warlock."
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:49 AM
–

|My interest in and support of GamerGate comes primarily from two sources: My absolute disdain for all things |Politically Correct My rejection of the gradual, deliberate process of feminization Western society has been undergoing |since the second half of the 20th century. You just lost me right there. The entire argument of the feminist/SJW side of gamergate was that it was a false flag banner operating under the guise of media transparency. This article's author is essentially proving this ac…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:42 PM
–

Why is this video on /r/mensrights if not the implicit assumption that it's a pro-men's rights opinion?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:45 AM
–

Anthony Cumia regularly referred to women on his radio show as "holes". I'm not sure you want this man to represent you.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 12:37 AM
2

It could be both. I get the sense that you're playing semantics games here. What's your point?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:32 AM
2

I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:25 AM
1

It's a confluence of factors. I'll try to succinctly explain: Because MR is seen in a similar light to White Pride movements. In some ways, if MRAs allow their party line to be one that ignores the historical significance of feminism, and that there has been a history of oppression, the movement will come off this way. It's the same as someone saying "why isn't there a White Entertainment Television channel? It's unfair!" It ignores the historical significance of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow l…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:29 PM
–

Men are much more likely to be mugged than women Source?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:02 AM
–

Men and women are socialized differently. Now we're getting somewhere.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:15 AM
–

You're missing the point completely, and you're ignoring the broad fact that men and women are socialized differently in society. Catcalling isn't something men have an issue with in society. By and large men don't have Women attempting to catcall them in public or follow them around attempting to pick them up. I said it's a women-specific issue. You're arguing that it's not a global problem. I'm not even arguing that point. My point is that it happens, and when it does, it happens almost exclus…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:51 AM
–

I can and have walked around this area of NYC without incident (except for salespeople trying to harass me into buying knockoff handbags and panhandlers, which aren't gender neutral) and had no problems with catcalling and being hit on. Catcalling and being aggressively hit on in public is by and large a women-specific issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:45 AM
–

Again, I disagree. Aggressive panhandling is not a gender specific problem. Mugging is not a gender specific problem. Catcalling and following someone with amorous intent IS a gender specific problem.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:44 AM
–

Look I'm all for modulating the message. But if you ignore the effects of socialization and how it has affected our society in favor of a myopic view of gender issues you're just going to create a needless battle. It won't actually be in service of true gender neutrality, it will just fulfill a selfish desire to argue.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:07 AM
–

I disagree. I believe if you swap the genders you see a stark difference. Mostly in that catcalling is a gender specific phenomenon. I agree that the narrative that 'all men are sexist pigs' or that women are unsafe on the streets, or that women are the victims of some sort of oppressive low level violence is a narrative we want to be mindful of not perpetuating, however to ignore this as a phenomenon is short sighted.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:05 AM
–

Two fucked up guys over the course of 10 hours in the city is pretty much par for the course So you simply accept that within ten hours two people will follow you? I don't see that as par for the course. I feel like even in a big city like NYC we shouldn't accept that as okay.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:19 AM
-1

There's 38 million Black people in America. Two divided by 38 million would be 0.00000005% of Black people behave like them.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/14 06:51 AM
2

I think your ideological confusion has a lot to do with much of the overlap between men's rights and feminism into egalitarian space. MRM seems to have a lot of sub-categories, just like feminism. There's some MRA that actually have most of their beliefs in line with feminism (the destruction of rigid gender roles based on the patriarchy that actually hurt most men and benefit mostly the wealthy). Some MRA's believe in the 1950's ideal and actually use this subreddit as a weapon to further their…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:11 AM
–

I had this same issue with my wife early on in our relationship.I remember she emptied the garbage and left the can without a lid. My mom and dad had always been sticklers for stuff like that and I just stared at it in disbelief haha. Over the years we have fought about cleanliness. I have come to one conclusion. Think about it like this: It's just as hard for her to overcome her upbrining as it is for you to overcome yours. You can't just simply get rid of that pang of anxiety inside of you, it…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:27 PM
1

How can you prove psychology is just guessing?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:17 AM
0

unwatchable
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:39 AM
34

Poor kid. In the end he said "you okay?" Even after being assaulted, he still takes ownership and feels guilty. This is probably because of the message he got early on "boys strength isn't for hurting" (which is more benevolent sexism crap). There is a boy who has been stripped of his right to feel victimized, upset and hurt. We shouldn't teach our boys to bear that kind of responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:47 AM
1

It's the narrative that's been established in politics. It's the same way that the Democrats pander to African Americans. They don't actually have to do anything for them except for tow the party line. The official political line of a liberal leaning candidate is that he supports women's rights, women's issues (abortion, affirmative action for women, reduction of female domestic violence, pushing for women CEO's etc. etc.). Most of this is bullshit rhetoric, and the only actual changes made are …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:56 PM
6

I think this had more to do with the timing of the statement. It seemed like people were on the tail end of clapping and were already stopping when he added that in there. I don't think people outright stopped clapping intentionally as if to suggest they didn't like what he said, more like, adding fathers in didn't really resonate with people because men usually are an afterthought when we talk about child rearing. We already know that women are seen as the natural caretakers of children in soci…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:47 PM
6

He's 0-1, lost by submission. Also coming off an injury. She's a judoka. He might end up getting tapped out. Should be interesting.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 03:20 AM
3

Two problems with your logic. You assume that being a feminist is the best way to bring about the way the world ought to be. And in fact, feminism hasn't convinced me that their strategy is even the best way to bring about change either. A better question would be, why is feminism superior? You assume that TRP, and intentionally increasing masculine traits in men won't bring about world where things become the way they ought to be. I diverge from a lot of people here when I say that TRP is a coh…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 04:56 AM
1

Anyone else here finding it really difficult to be a normal bloke with ideals and standards and a moral conscience and still get laid? Don't be ridiculous. This was his first paragraph. It's clear both of them were looking for sex. Nobody is anybody's sex slave. It was a mistake not being able to read between the lines. I'm saying that for OP it was obvious from the start that she didn't want a relationship. So this isn't really a MR issue per se, but rather an issue with not being able to read …
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:05 AM
1

We talked for a couple days and I acted the perfect gentleman, never brought up sex or spoke provocatively despite her being quite open about the subject and genuinely tried to get to know her. This was your first mistake. If she's a physics student, her time is probably somewhat limited. She was looking to get laid, and you were looking for a relationship. She gets plenty of academic discourse from her friends and colleagues, doesn't need any more from you, and least of all any more that grates…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:34 AM
2

I debated posting this on here. More than likely she'll do time. I don't know about Germany, but we could maybe have a debate about whether or not she will do less time because women aren't viewed as being dangerous. I've already seen people making light of it in comments on video sites this is posted on. Some people are saying something to the effect of 'don't mess with Alaska chicks!' etc. The reality is if this was a guy he'd be immediately branded a sicko and the internet would be calling fo…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 10:02 AM
2

I thought Raiden was annoying, but I thought that was supposed to be part of his character. Snake was a seasoned vet, and Raiden was a youthful, doe eyed rookie. It was kind of weak that he had this long flowing blonde hair (kind of unrealistic for a mercenary) but I chalked that up to the Japanese's fascination with blondes. Overall I thought it was an enjoyable game though, I really liked it.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:54 PM
10

I was thinking the same thing. I was going to argue the point but decided it would fall on deaf ears. I've never known 'just be nice and treat her like a human, be interested in what she has to say' to ever get anyone I've ever known laid. It's a stupid strategy. Most times, guys hear that message, and try it on for size, then quickly learn that it doesn't work for shit. Then you figure out that you have to play games, work your frames and manage the shit tests, and that seems to get the most ef…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 10:08 AM
4

That was the part that stood out to me the most. They got really hung up on my belief that altruism is inherently selfish. It was stupid too because basically what I was saying was 'hey, promoting eradicating slut-shaming and a pro-sex attitude in society benefits both men and women, so that's why I think it's great, it helps you AND it helps me', and they couldn't get over the supposed selfishness of it.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 10:03 AM
2

good point rapey_raperson, good point
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:05 AM
2

My best understanding is there is some philosophical overlap, with some significant derivations. The largest overlap that I notice is both believe that the end effect of feminism and promotion of feminist ideology has negatively affected the male experience. MRM differs from TRP I think in that the MRM doesn't seek to re-establish some sort of idealized 1950's version of masculinity, but rather seeks to promote a broader range of male experience into our culture, rejecting notions of needing to …
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:29 AM
-1

This never happens to me because I believe in subsidizing birth control, so no, it's not essentially how it goes for me.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:46 PM
14

Shutup Meg.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:08 AM
-1

Not exactly. It would be more like, 'in addition to' the vulgarity etc., there is not much of an objective assertion other than his opinion. His assertion essentially is "men should be more like X" rather than an assertion of objective fact. This places his argumentation more into the realm of a personal or political theory of the way he believes society should operate. We need more crisp argumentation if we want MRM to be effectrive, it needs to be perceived as a sound, reasonable set of truths…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:24 PM
-1

If you can get past the clear vitriol and aggression, and somehow resolve the discrepancy between the needless vulgarity and that of so-called 'scholarly work' he's doing, not much of his opinions are backed up by fact. Too much speculative analysis without enough facts to back up the claims, and not enough clearly presented argumentation for this to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:37 PM
-4

"Pussy novelty"? I can't really take this serious. There is nothing scholarly or noteworthy about this video.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:21 PM
2

Masculinity for a male homo sapien is foremost having a superior intellect to females. This is an odd thing to say. I'm wondering why you would say it, and how it fits into your overall view of the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:47 PM
2

That was when he lost me too. I was hoping for some strong logical rebuttals in this video that I could call upon as quick references for future discussions but I think he was trying to be funny or something and lost his discussion points somewhere in his attempts to make his video marketable.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:07 PM
19

"He's not worth it honey." The implicit assumption that whatever she is so enraged about was his fault!
/r/MensRights14/10/13 07:59 PM
3

Let's do ourselves a favor and start policing our message now instead of just being a catch all for generic complaints against women. I see no sources that he cites other than his ramble about haircuts, ladies nights and razor blades to back up his claim that ACA will overbenefit women over men.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:59 PM
2

What does the custody order regarding your child say about dispensing medications? In other words, I see your frustration, but going after the psychiatrist isn't going to do much, especially if the mother has sole legal authority to dispense medications as she sees fit.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:55 AM
4

Debate aside, the woman at the very end when she said "fucking scum. fucking scuuuum'' sounded like a 9 year old that didn't get to play a video game he wanted. And I found that hilarious.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:32 AM
1

Relevant in what aspect? If you intentionally separate men of color from white males, then you have to concede that it's not a MRM, it's a WMRM.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:43 PM
2

That's a HUGE problem you run into in MRA. Some MRA think that it's White men's rights, and lump civil rights in with feminism.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:26 AM
4

I'm not gonna say it was impossible to fap to, just difficult.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:11 AM
2

Totally
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:39 AM
1

I think race plays as much a role in the vilifying of Chris Brown as his gender does. Compared to a guy like Charlie Sheen, who also pleaded guilty to a bunch of domestic violence crimes, isn't perceived as negatively as Chris Brown is. Or maybe Chris Brown just needs to audition for 2.5 men?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter