TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bignick1190 Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by bignick1190 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

Mostly because roasts are meant to be funny, is my guess. Like yea, roasts go after your flaws/ insecurities but usually with witty punch lines. This wasn't a roast, they broiled her.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/22 02:08 AM
1

paranoid about my crazy ex. This is undoubtedly a legitimate concern that I highly doubt most people in this sub have considered. I 100% agree with money needing to be monitored and I think implementing a blind aspect to it would be the answer to the concerns of intrusion.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:10 PM
7

Fair enough but that's not exactly the reality we live in and we should be thinking of how to protect the men that are in this scenario.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:05 PM
3

Just want to add putting money into a savings account to the list. Child support should include savings for the child.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 11:00 PM
11

Women get to choose abortion with zero say from the person who impregnated them, men have no such option. Men aren't capable of saying "I don't want that child", we're not capable of opting out of being a parent, at least not where the law is concerned. What if I didn't want the child? Guess what, I still have to pay child support.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 10:58 PM
1

I wouldn't necessary call it intrusive, the person paying child supports deserves to know the money is going to the child just as the receiver knows they'll be receiving X amount of money every month. However, if you wanted to make it less "intrusive" you can create a "blind" scenario where the payer doesn't actually see the numbers but instead a third party mediator does.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 10:54 PM
1

I think it was justified. His height doesn't make him any less dangerous if he decides to pull out a knife or gun and I don't need to legally wait to find out if he has either of those things on his person when he's acting the way he was acting. Also, he's a 5 foot tall middle aged adult, you treating him condescendingly is the exact thing he was freaking out about.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:37 AM
0

I was a bouncer for many years, subduing unruly women was part of my job description.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:34 AM
1

You're supposed to downvote spam so the website filters it out, hence why it's called a "spam filter". Nope, technically according to reddit, you're supposed to downvote people whose comments don't contribute to the conversation but in practice it's a "like" and "dislike" button. Respond physically means using the least amount of force to subdue the threat. Like the guy did in the video. He simply tackled the man to the ground and restrained him. He didn't continue beating him up while they were…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:41 AM
1

I'm downvoting you because I disagree with you... you know, using the voting system as it's meant to be used. That's okay, try hitting a woman for using "threatening words" in public and see how that works out for you. If a woman entered my personal space in a threatening manner I would be legally allowed to respond physically. "As a general rule, self-defense only justifies the use of force when it is used in response to an immediate threat. The threat can be verbal, as long as it puts the inte…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:25 AM
1

People have a right to defend themselves and those around them from perceived threats, whether that perceived threat is a 3 foot tall woman or a 7 foot tall body builder doesn't change the fact that people still have a right to defend themselves and those around them. The person in the video was becoming increasingly dangerous and threatening to fight people. If you can't back up your bark, then don't fucking bark so loud. It wasn't like he was saying "alright everybody, let's dance" he was lite…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:17 AM
1

It's not weasley language, physically interveneing is the language I would use for anyone in the situation. Stop trying to make this some sort of sexist issue. I'll be clear, regardless of the person's sex or gender, I think physical intervention is justified in that scenario.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:04 AM
1

If a women were in my face becoming increasingly threatening, or increasingly threatening to someone else, sure I'd physically intervene. Just because someone is having a mental break doesn't suddenly mean they're not dangerous to the people around them, if anything they're more dangerous than people who aren't having a mental break. He didn't "seem threatening", he was literally threatening to fight people. Edit: also, don't know why you're trying to make this some sexist thing. My opinions are…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:50 AM
-2

He wasn't "annoying", he was becoming increasingly threatening to everyone around him including literally asking people to fight him... that's what "do you want to take this outside" means if you weren't aware. It not like he was talking on his speaker phone in public, that's annoying, he was literally verbally abusing people and entering their personal spaces in a threatening manner.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:17 AM
-1

I feel bad that he's short and has to deal with what comes with that but when you start treating strangers poorly because you have a little man complex, you have what's coming to you. You can't say "do you want to take this outside" and not expect someone to take you up on that offer. In that situation he was the aggressor and he was acting aggressively to everyone around him, he deserved to be put down by one of the people he was instigating.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:53 PM
-8

Yea but he was asking for it.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 08:45 PM
1

This is the weirdest version of "fuck, marry, kill" I've ever played. Kill the pregnant women, ( who can pass up a two for one deal?) fuck the elderly woman (gum job for the win!) And marry the 20 something year old.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 12:34 PM
6

Did I say I deserve peoples attention? No. I said everyone deserves basic human decency and that ghosting people lacks said decency. It's perfectly fine for someone to not want to talk with another person but should they have gone as far as going on a date, the moral, kind, decent thing is to let someone know you're no longer interested. whiny baby You may not be a baby but if you took even a moment to evaluate your responses in this thread alone, you'd realize you certainly act like a child. we…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 11:48 AM
28

Lmao... you have a chance to explain your side in a coherent manner yet you chose to write this. Says a lot about you and your character.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 11:32 AM
32

How exactly is telling someone that you never plan on talking to them again even comparable to a generation specific mannerism? Treating people with kindness and respect, or as the bible would put it, "how you would want to be treated", is literally the bare minimum of human decency. Jesus christ, it really shouldn't have to be explained that ghosting people, regardless of your gender, is just a crappy thing to do. Edit: just gonna attach the definition of moral for ya since you don't seem to kn…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 11:27 AM
52

You don't see how treating another person with respect and common decency is a morality issue?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 11:19 AM
62

I mean still, a "hey, I'm not interested" text is the moral thing to do. If you straight up ghost people you're a crappy person, plain and simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 11:16 AM
18

Just put a stipulation that states "this document is ironclad" and you're good.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:51 AM
0

I mean.. under the premise of anonymity there would be no logical reason to lie.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/20 08:32 PM
1

The same way you collect data on literally ever other thing there's data on. You ask people. Although it's not quite as simple when under the scrutiny of scientific process.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/20 07:21 PM
1

According to actual statistics, 20% of men cheat and only 13% of women cheat.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/20 07:04 PM
1

Someone is using their big brain thinking cap today.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 07:14 PM
4

I fully support the legalization of weed. My original comment said selling drugs wasn't upstanding. Being that it's currently illegal would mean that it is in fact not upstanding. You can do whatever mental gymnastics you want to add to the morality of selling something like weed in which I most definitely wouldn't disagree with however that doesn't change the fact that it's not an upstanding career choice. It's not just one law being broken, it's multiple including but not limited to tax evasio…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 01:39 AM
3

Well for one, it's illegal which automatically demeans it. Secondly, the same can be said for prostitution in which was being demeaned in the comment I responded to.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:46 AM
3

As a person who has sold a multitude of drugs in my late teens, including weed.. no, no I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:29 AM
5

I mean, because being a drug dealer is such an upstanding career choice?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/20 11:49 PM
1

Just a bunch of dudes being guys gay. Fixed it for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/20 02:05 PM
1

Same with r/thedivision
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 12:05 PM
2

I meeeeeaaaaan... he did escalate the situation by hosing her... but obviously she was being ridiculous.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 01:16 AM
2

Absolutely! And I also understand that peoples humor differs from each other. Someone may make a rape joke that I don't personally find humorous but that doesn't mean they don't have a right to find it funny. Not only that but people cope with life in very different ways, if a person decides to joke about rape because it helps them cope with their own experiences why should someone tell them that's wrong?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 07:07 PM
2

I don't believe any subject should be free from becoming a comedic focal point.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:51 AM
1

Cool.. so we're on the same page.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:48 AM
49

Obviously it's satire that plays on the very real likelihood that this man was facing becoming a rape victim due to false accusations of rape from the accuser. No one deserves to get raped... Except rapists and child molesters. I guess the parallel can be made that sending someone into a scenario that almost guarantees their rape is just as bad as being an actual rapist though.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:31 AM
1

I actually agree with you but what about a scenario where the accused has already served X amount of time prior to the accusers lies being determined? So say the accused spends 7 years in jail and the accusers sentence for lying is only say 2 years, does that sound like justice or should the accusers minimum potential sentence be the time already served by the falsely accused?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:16 AM
96

Because that's what he would have gotten?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:10 AM
1

I say the same thing all the time. I have family that bot survived and died in Auschwitz and other camps, luckily my grandma fled Poland with her soon to be husband in time but their relatives weren't so lucky. I have no hatred to for the germans of today's world. What have they done to me? I feel the same everytime a black person tries to pull the "my relatives were slaves" card.. cool and mine were tortured and possibly gassed to death, what's your point?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/20 01:01 AM
3

It probably has something to do with how evolution/ adaption wired us. A mans "purpose" in the animal kingdom is to reproduce with as many people as possible whereas a womans role is to nurture and ensure survivability of offspring so we're basically running off of two completely different operating systems. Now I get that those are archiac reasons that people don't like to acknowledge in modern society because we're supposed to be "civilized" but nonetheless those are things that are so deeply …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 02:22 PM
1

From my limited amount of research female predators tend do their "work" in the physical world. They need more of an "emotional" connection that they get with people they know... which is why so many female teachers are caught with students. So my assumption is that females will be more likely to prey on people they know irl than they would prey on people over the internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 01:24 PM
3

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/15157004/ns/dateline_nbc/t/inside-dateline-where-are-female-predators/ Essentially To Catch A Predator is a horrible baseline because it only focuses on one type of predatory behavior. According to the article men and women differ in the way they find their prey.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 12:34 PM
10

I wouldn't say that. I think most women just don't get caught. Guys are taught to keep everything to themselves so if they are being assaulted the odds of them actually admitting to it is far less than a girl admitting to it. That's my 2 cents at least.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 12:36 AM
6

I think if you're aware that the person you're hooking up with is in a relationship and cheating with you than you're a complete POS. She might not have cheated but she actively and knowingly participated in an act that would most likely cause emotional and mental harm to the person being cheated on. Essentially, yea you're absolutely right that she didn't cheat but that doesn't mean she's not guilty of something else.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 12:17 AM
1

I'm sure animals have a way of consenting with one another. Much like female birds being receptive to the mating dances of their Male counterparts. The whole premise is if you can't give consent than the sex isn't consensual, if you're not having consensual sex than you're being raped. If you're not being raped than the sex is consensual. There isn't a gray area or a sort of limbo between consensual sex and rape. It's either one or the other. Logically people can consent to things when intoxicat…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/20 06:09 AM
1

Soooooo... when two drunk people have sex, who's raping who? Are they raping each other?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/20 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter