TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bilberberbers Archive

View 3 posts and 110 comments by bilberberbers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

lol more than a quarter of men cheat. a significant portion of taken guys you're talking to are sizing you up to the boner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 08:41 PM
2

For the same reason people don't transition to male/female if they're not trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 08:28 PM
1

You're communicating as though he's your bf but that hardly matters because you haven't given it up for him. That's the reason your bf pats you on the head and says you won the argument. Apart from that, you'll have to bring substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 08:27 PM
8

undesirable for women based on their behavior Sexually aggressive "creepy" behavior stops being so if the man is attractive. The sexually charged spaces that are undesirable for women are so because they have few attractive men. Behavior of men in a group setting is a constant, and the difference in the success of different spaces for providing the male crowd there sexual opportunities is how attractive the male patrons are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 07:28 PM
11

Not really. Highly attractive men don't go to those kind of events because they already are swamped with all the sex they could want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 07:26 PM
-3

Self reported or observed? You watched them 24/7? The mean number of reported lifetime partners for men is 5-6 and that is before adjusting for the fact that men multiply their total lifetimes partners by a factor of 2-3x. Self-reports are not reliable. Its a good bet that at least a quarter of men have only had 1 partner throughout life, breakup or no.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 10:09 AM
-4

Both of those are biological and physic functions that's part of dimorphism. Male earning power, a consequence of general intelligence, is as genetic and biological as their strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 10:05 AM
5

He's no more wrong for having lots of casual sex and judging women for it than a person who drives a gas car to get to work 100 miles away when there is no alternative means of transportation is a hypocrite because they judge polluters. Men need to have sex to signal to any potential partner no matter how virginal she is that he is a normal, good partner. This is a system determined by women. As evidenced by their revulsion to male virgins and their frequent use of male virginity as an insult. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 10:04 AM
7

The amount of money someone makes ebbs and flows. The strongest determining factor in income is general intelligence, which is genetic and stable throughout the workspan and through most of the lifespan until the very end. If a person is a high earner, odds are they will be a high earner for life. Pretending that this is not a fact known to women is infantilizing and insulting to them. Whether or not you believe women who are chaste should be attracted to sexually successful men, they are. It do…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 10:01 AM
0

Most people don't have a level of maturity to wish their ex happiness Submissive people have such a strange way of reframing things. Its nothing to do with maturity and more to do with relative estimations of self-worth. If you feel you're worth more than them, naturally you'll wish to see them miserable for "wronging you", whereas if you see their value as greater than your own you will grovel and wish them well. That's all there is to it, no ifs ands or buts about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:58 AM
-1

If you're still seeing each other, even platonically, you're still sex partners. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:50 AM
-2

Only loser women get knocked up by guys they're not 100% sure will back them forever intimately and financially. Marriages are more stable than the loser women here like to admit. There are huge swathes of people who have stable lifelong marriages, because the women don't choose loser men. If you don't choose your partner from literally the bottom 3% of men, you won't have this issue. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:48 AM
-1

than she was offering him. lmao you defeat your own argument while you make it. He shouldn't be negotiating with some crazy bimbo over his own children. They're his by default (children are their father's, that's why they have their father's name, no their mother's) from any reasonable perspective. If women want men to step up, they need to step back, and that means submissively doing the right thing and offering full custody to the men from the start by law.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:46 AM
0

do get custody. 100% sole custody? Anything else should be the default and is meaningless to fight for.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:45 AM
3

Really? Full 100% custody? Or are they fighting for what should be the default?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:44 AM
-1

When it comes to your kids, women shouldn't be using them as weapons as they almost universally do in court battles over custody. Its undeniably abusive to the children to do that. A person cannot care for their kids and do that at the same time. Literally not possible. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:43 AM
-2

Women destroy the family unit by divorce 80% of the time because they just aren't "feeling it" anymore. Literally permanently and irreversibly destroy the neurological development of their children to get creamed in by strangers who present a serious danger to those kids. The stats on single motherhood and the criminals they raise are profound and back this up. Single fathers do not have this issue, because of their innate strength and quality of parenting. You'll never see a single father whine…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:40 AM
1

Just have the anal squelching queer sex with him you undeniably desire and get it over with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:34 PM
1

Regulating emotions is a function of the prefrontal cortex and is powerfully associated with overall intelligence. Men are better at emotional regulation than women because their neocortices are dramatically larger. Apart from the ability to regulate emotional expression, which is more pronounced in men, there is no scientific validity to EQ. It is purely speculative mumbo jumbo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:31 PM
1

Most men throughout history and even today work in the world building jobs (agriculture, construction, trades, business, etc.).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:28 PM
2

Clearly not what he expressed. Why do you talk to men online as if they're your boyfriend and are going to give in to weird childish mindgame stuff? They aren't also getting your greasetrap, so why would they go along with this kind of nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 07:16 PM
1

A 27 yo female virgin. Damn I don't want to imagine the face of such a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 07:09 PM
1

Their children are clearly not more important to them or they wouldn't risk exposing their children to the dangers of casual sex or relationships with strangers by being involved in OL dating. Any single mother who cares about her children gives up dating until they're old enough to be independent and out of the house. Simple as. Relationships are for making children and the risk a stranger who isn't a biological parent to the children brings to the children (the data on this is clear and not up…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 07:04 PM
2

Accusing a calm person of being hostile is the surest sign of anger/hostility. Calm down sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:53 PM
1

Fat women aren't nice, their hormones are all out of whack.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:44 PM
1

They would starve?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:43 PM
1

There are plenty of women who think this. No there aren't and this is part of a gullibility problem if you genuinely believe this. Women are notoriously unreliable self-reporters when it comes to their beliefs around sex and sexual relationships. You have to observe actions, not take people at their word, to get an honest assessment of preference. The selective pressure women place on male height is extreme enough to significantly boost the suicide rate of shorter men, and the data shows that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 12:13 PM
2

Notice how they're dodging any of the examples of the rules being applied to women and misusing their first semester freshman le logic terms to try to seem intelligent about the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 11:49 AM
5

Slavery is an ongoing reality, chump. There are tens of thousands of sex slaves at any given time in the US, and millions more around the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:12 PM
1

Haagen das haagen das wiener schnitzel haagen das luftballon wehrmacht sauerkraut und bratwurst haagen das haagen das autobahn fahrt on my wiener schnitzel haagen das
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:11 PM
5

Blood molestation of a child is unacceptable. You are not permitted to subject a child to your fetishes, including your sadism. Capisce?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:08 PM
1

oof no cap touch grass toxicity
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:17 PM
2

There is no evidence that this is the case. No need to simp for all women as a whole whenever a negative quality is mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:32 PM
5

I don't see how some meth addicted dude who just got caught and is about to pull 15 years in prison is any sort of leader? He's not. But his behavior in the short-term around her sends up the same flags. Arrogant, aggressive, disinhibited, commandeering. Arousal is arousal, the pussy can't tell the difference even if the brain can.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 11:56 AM
1

That is why some people have a wooooo phase in college when they are 18/19/20. Women in particular overplay the actual amount of cognitive and frontal lobe development that occurs after the end of puberty because of the popsci idea they learned from reddit that "le brains develop at 25". The proportion of your faculties that does develop after your teenage years is miniscule in comparison to the development during your teenage years. If you are still impulsive at 19, you are impulsive for your a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:47 AM
1

"Being a slut" is a permanent thing. Once one always one. Its not stopping that's happening after, its deception/manipulation by not presenting her true self. A lot of the conflicts here and with this "mgtow/incel" crap generally boil down to a common mating strategy among women: deception. Since men find deception incredibly repulsive it causes conflict. Also, no. No guy likes to be told he's less important to her than some rando she banged it out with on the first day through the act of withho…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:41 AM
1

This is such an obvious self-deception you tell yourself to justify not being attracted to men who are personality and psychologically a match for you because you find them physically repulsive. Try to be honest with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:50 AM
1

Humans and cultures aren't so special that they aren't guided by biology. Plenty of sexual and social behaviors are cross-cultural and genetic in origin on a species wide basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:44 AM
2

Oof yikes big incel neckbear
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:36 AM
1

Why are you surprised that there's a punitive aspect to inconsistency in behavior? Life is that way for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:29 PM
1

The disparity in wealth transfer provided by men to women is so disturbingly large that the balance still rests powerfully in mens favor here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:24 PM
3

Because you don't owe her anything, just like women don't owe men sex. And just like you can be a good woman with different standards for casual sex partners and long term exploitable partners, so can a man be a good man even if he exploits women for casual sex and pampers his long term partners. Of course, I don't believe this, but its the only perspective that is actually morally valid and consistent from the "you can be a good person with different standards for different people" point of vie…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:17 PM
4

No different than pining after a guy because he has status, stability and income. That's even more dehumanizing as it reduces him to utility.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:15 PM
4

Women are notoriously unreliable with self-reports concerning sexual topics, so why would anybody ask "the women ITT" about a sexual topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:13 PM
3

Men are the only ones who still think slut shaming bothers women. A proper measure of what bothers someone is how frequently they talk about it, or how they react to it when it comes up, not what they report to be bothered by. Women are tremendously bothered by slut shaming by any measure of action (which matters infinitely more than words). Sorry, not sorry. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:11 PM
0

Maybe from a woman's perspective lol That's not harsh at all by male standards. Are women really this sensitive?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:00 PM
4

Yeah, they really need a diet more than anything. Just less cheesecake, generally speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:59 PM
2

The disparity in grooming is less severe than the disparity in wealth achievement and status achievement that men do. Yeah, your one hour of makeup routine is definitely equal to decades of balls to the wall endless hyper performance. Even the average man significantly outearns the average woman. Men try to be not status and personality repulsive way more than women try to be not any kind of repulsive, because men are judged on status to an even more extreme degree than women are judged on groom…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:56 PM
7

Now if only you had the good sense to follow this train of thought of casual sex being damaging to young women to its legalistic conclusions/solutions. Most men do see that women don't benefit from these interactions. They assume the women have equal prefrontal cortical development to men and are thus capable of fully seeing this too and don't mind it. Why wouldn't guys be bitter about sexual inequality, the most sought after non-necessity by people? Any reasonable person would be bitter about e…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:51 PM
5

The majority of women are unpaired well into spinterism when their reproductive ability is dramatically reduced.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:45 PM
1

The courtship phase of a relationship is still a part of the relationship. It means exactly what he said it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:44 PM
24

Big oof yikes, touch grass. That's some incel perspective. Why is it "wasted"? He doesn't owe her anything, she should be happy for his friendship. Friends give friends gifts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 07:42 PM
2

Damn, that's embarrassing. How out of touch with basic study design and study quality does a person have to be to use a study of such low quality as an attempt to derail well established knowledge?
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/21 11:03 AM
3

most probably This subreddit is for scientific discussion. Statements on probability require corresponding sources. Please refrain from making religious or ideological statements about probability. Thanks.
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/21 11:01 AM
11

And to impute virtue on taller men vs shorter men.
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/21 09:51 AM
4

The blackpill is literally just the evidence based worldview. A thing is blackpill if it is supported by the evidence. Saying "blackpillers disprove themselves" means "evidence disproves itself". It doesn't make any sense. If a particular thing is actually true, it is definitionally part of the blackpill worldview. This is not even a point that is up for discussion, it is a definitional issue. You are a "blackpiller" too if you believe that your worldview is backed by evidence, that is if you ar…
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 05:00 PM
2

You are communiating in a very feminine, unscientific manner. Communicate more informationally/factually (masculine) manner so that your points can be coherent and understood. The fact that you have a coinslot and not a joystick is not going to get you brownie points because you can't give it up to anyone here. They're interested in facts, not your favors. You can't just state something and wish it to be true and it becomes so. No ones gaming to give you their change.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 04:45 PM
1

Blackpill communism is the only legitimate communism.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 04:43 PM
32

They're encouraging sexual assault of a minor there too, even the OP's post suggests sexual assault of the boy at the end.
/r/PussyPass12/10/21 09:55 AM
2

The "blackpill", that is evidence/science based reasoning of human sexual relations applied to everyday life, has its origins entirely in the incel community. If you believe that evidence is applicable to human sexual behavior, you are definitionally an ideological incel.
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 08:57 AM
4

Maybe, but our intelligence could just as easily have developed through brutal survival selection as opposed to sexual selection. Men who weren't cunning and resourceful were considerably less likely to survive during traumatic food scarcity or in the face of predators.
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 08:56 AM
1

Relationships as we know them with a long courtship period and female autonomy in mate selection were not a thing in our early evolutionary history. They would not have been relevant to the development of our intelligence.
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 08:54 AM
2

Yes, it is part of the reason. Vegetarianism and high rates of malnutrition contribute to probably about ~3" of height stunting of the Indian average.
/r/BlackPillScience08/06/21 07:23 PM
12

Statistics doesn't care about bro talk or loser word shaming.
/r/BlackPillScience28/05/21 12:44 AM
5

Unless you're engaging in skin to skin contact with friends during sexual intercourse, you will not stimulate the hormones associated with mental wellbeing efficiently, and you will suffer irreversible premature cognitive decline as a result. This isn't about friendship. Read the post title and sidebar so you can productively and honestly contribute.
/r/BlackPillScience28/05/21 12:42 AM
14

Good at having long bones.
/r/BlackPillScience01/04/21 10:55 PM
4

The stats do seem to indicate this, which is why their ratings seem so messed up when you give them a 1-10 scale to use expecting some kind of normal distribution like you get with men.
/r/BlackPillScience01/04/21 10:54 PM
19

The romantic social isolation that these men face on account of their low sexual attractiveness has a measurable and undeniable massive impact on their mental and physical health, to the point of dramatically increasing their odds of suicide and diseases like diabetes/heart disease. How genetically and unchangeably attractive a man is to women if he is straight is one of the primary drivers of his health. Its just built in to sexually reproducing species at the biological level.
/r/BlackPillScience01/04/21 10:53 PM
11

No, the mice did not recover function. The impact of temporary consumption during development was permanent in adulthood.
/r/BlackPillScience01/04/21 10:51 PM
1

The tests are the only observations (ie base unit of scientific evidence) that we have to go on, the rest including the 3% figure is pure speculation.
/r/BlackPillScience31/03/21 10:34 PM
1

This is not taking into account that reported father is not the actual father up to 30% of the time.
/r/BlackPillScience31/03/21 01:35 PM
35

This is relationship (provider-servant male) pairings, not passionate genuine attraction casual sex pairings or reproductive pairings. I'd imagine when sexual attraction is not the woman's goal for that particular pairing it plays less of a part in the pairing.
/r/BlackPillScience31/03/21 01:34 PM
8

The same could be said about forums that discuss global warming. Your perspective is anti-scientific. Selective postings of publications is a feature, not criticism, of scientific discussion. When discussing climate change people don't bring up articles about the health benefits of apples. Your manner of thinking indicates that you are experiencing the same emotionally driven resistance to an evidence based understanding of these things that is common and expected in people faced with a shatteri…
/r/BlackPillScience21/03/21 01:40 PM
24

EUPD is the non-US term for borderline personality disorder btw. The abuse was likely reactive abuse, as those with BPD (male or female) are overwhelmingly emotionally and physically abusive to their partners. If you read the article she has a history of physically abusing others, including past partners.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/21 01:00 AM
4

Nah, lots of thirsty men. It works for obese women too, minus the ogling.
/r/PussyPass04/03/21 09:12 PM
5

I read papers about flying pigs and such. You are spewing feces out your fingers. Provide sources or get a grip.
/r/BlackPillScience03/03/21 10:17 AM
1

What is a sex worker? Do you mean a prostitute?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/21 10:11 PM
21

Personality is stable through the lifespan regardless of efforts to change or therapy. Pleasure seeking behavior, which includes drug use and casual sex, is a part of personality. You can't make a ho into a housewife.
/r/BlackPillScience20/02/21 01:18 AM
2

What's a gipsy and why does it get your panties all in a twist?
/r/MGTOW19/02/21 02:25 PM
7

So long as the parents have passed away this makes sense. Otherwise you are just rewarding another man for achieving orgasm and abandoning his kids, which makes him dominant over you and you the nanny.
/r/MGTOW208/02/21 12:58 PM
1

Its extremely slight. Significant in statistical terms does not mean large.
/r/BlackPillScience16/01/21 10:07 PM
2

Part of the theory is that people who provide sources (academics) are part of the conspiracy of cultural Marxism, and thus asking for sources itself can be a sign that someone is a saboteur and not to be trusted.
/r/MGTOW13/12/20 10:42 AM
17

Laws requiring companies over a certain number of employees to have employees from certain backgrounds in certain proportions. That is the case in the US anyway, where underrepresentation on a purely demographic as opposed to skill/talent basis can lead to civil rights legal action.
/r/MGTOW12/12/20 08:25 PM
1

This isn't really true. While its true that trad worshippers are not going their own way, its not true that "the kind of women that victimize men don't like porn". The most sexually liberal women turn ultra conservative when it comes to securing their own personal future. Plenty of rich men get babytrapped by prostitutes looking for an out. If you force women to compete with legal and easily accessible prostitution you will end up with this kind of problem on a massive scale.
/r/MGTOW12/12/20 08:04 PM
40

There are guys who are serial killers and others who stalk around looking for children to kidnap. There are men who torture and maim others while managing drug smuggling empires. But its the men who don't want to date or marry high disease risk pornstars that are the evilest in the whole big bad world. She's lost her mind.
/r/MGTOW12/12/20 07:55 PM
8

Its not even 5%. The vast majority of all violent criminal behavior is undertaken by 1.5-2% of men, most of whom have a personality disorder. They're all voluntarily associating with these dangerous men.
/r/MGTOW10/12/20 08:26 AM
1

Source?
/r/MGTOW24/11/20 02:59 AM
2

It just sounds like another sexual strategy, not unlike "bad boying" one's way into women's pants. This sort of just reinforces the idea that creepy has little meaning.
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 10:40 AM
10

Yeah, women are just bad at reading people so they are more liable to see and appreciate social dominance and hierarchy if its explicit and thus they respond more to cruel displays of it.
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 10:38 AM
4

Cuckexas
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/20 11:32 PM
7

All consequential art was created by men.
/r/MGTOW03/10/20 11:30 PM
1

I think it was 4 to 7 years, depending on the woman.
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 06:43 AM
8

Not really. It is the other way around. Falling in love fast is a trait of BPD, a woman's illness. And they choose dark triad physically, sexually, and emotionally abusive/predatory men, by seeking them out. They are not sought out by these men.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/20 04:34 AM
10

Ethnics are disproportionately incel. There are too many whites for the incels in the general American population to be mainly ethnics.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/20 04:33 AM
12

No, the looks that matter are the genetic ones. Height and masculine facial bone structure, especially jaw size and shape. Massive unscientific cope to believe you can effort your way into attractiveness.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/20 04:32 AM
16

Nah, they're 30%+ of the male population now. The last time they were outliers was mid 20th century.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/20 04:25 AM
14

Massive cope. Women are the same worldwide.
/r/BlackPillScience07/09/20 10:47 AM
1

Nothing against his height but he's not 5' 7". Probably closer to 5' 4".
/r/MGTOW05/09/20 02:27 AM
1

male bodies than faces The research shows that this is down to the emphasis placed on height, not physical fitness.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/20 07:04 AM
4

Yep, George Soros is rich because he spends like he only has $50k
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 11:16 AM
3

The most significant place where psychopaths are highly represented is the prison population.
/r/BlackPillScience11/06/20 02:30 PM
3

No profession is dominated by psychopathic individuals. Surgeons, fighter pilots, etc. have comparatively elevated rates of psychopathy. A few percent, for example, vs 1% in the general population. Both of these estimates, for the general population and for certain professions, are suspected to be overestimates. A growing number of psychopathic employees is also the death knell of the quality of an organization, from an investment bank to a hospital.
/r/BlackPillScience11/06/20 02:26 PM
4

Tinder a fuckbuddy app that guys use to look for fucktoys they sometimes convert into relationships. That's all, by design and by usage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/06/20 01:39 PM
5

Tinder is by design and usage a premarital fuckbuddy app. Sure, you can use a gangbang club for getting drinks and chatting about the weather, but nobody buys it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/06/20 01:38 PM
17

The idea that women should have to work and provide an equal financial contribution to a partnership does not originate with men, but once originated is fair game. Suck it up, buttercup.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 02:06 AM
-4

Otherwise no woman would ever choose a doctor over a bodybuilder. You fundamentally misunderstand what constitutes the qualities that make a man physically attractive to women. Fitness is a modifier, the base qualities are height and masculine facial bone structure, both entirely genetically controlled without surgical intervention. If these are absent, exceptional fitness will reduce attractiveness by the try-hard or compensating factor.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 12:17 AM
–

Like the other poster said, not many hit 300+ but 100+ quite a few do. Most women I've met who had "party days" or "fun days" ("wild youth" women are not the majority of women, but around 25%) hit 100+ but won't be honest about the number unless they feel very unjudged and comfortable around you. Note surveys on this aren't reliable because women downplay their number by about a factor of 3x (and that's not including the "nonsex" like blowjobs and anal they don't count as "real sex") and men exa…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/20 03:58 PM
14

it’s literally not her fault?? because she wasn’t the asshole who posted it?? taking sexy pictures between two consenting adults is fine, but the minute someone posts it it’s no longer consensual. she didn’t ask for it to be put on the internet. have you maybe considered that? While you're responding to someone making a privacy argument, her fault lies somewhere else. The primary issue is her husband clearly expressed his opposition to being near anybody having anything remotely to do with porno…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/20 01:50 PM
1

No, it's more like putting something on the stove and leaving it unattended, and then being shocked when it catches fire. It might only rarely catch fire, but its almost a universally known rule not to leave cooking things unattended on the stove top.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/20 01:45 PM
0

Massive cope. NPD is an extremely rare personality disorder rooted in genetics, and smear campaigns after breakups are common. Think first, express yourself after.
/r/askTRP20/04/20 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter