TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bildramer Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by bildramer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-14

Just contrast it to "misogyny isn't a real thing", easily demonstrating the bias. These other "clever" rhetorical tricks in the comments just make you sound like a redditor.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 12:58 PM
2

Unfortunately, the OP mixes such misandry (men are violent emotionless brutes, girls doing better at school is because they're better and mature faster instead of it being pure teacher bias, ...) and uncontroversially true facts (men are stronger and faster, man + 100 women is more babies than woman + 100 men, men and women have innate personality and cognitive differences, men cause more crime, ...). You can't change reality if you start by ignoring reality, and certainly not if you start by co…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 12:43 PM
3

We don't get to see the manifesto when it would be bad news for the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 03:17 AM
1

Natural experiment: bisexuals. Just ask them. I'm sure you'll find the results enlightening.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 01:20 PM
3

They would just flee the country, turn to Sharia law, or worse. There's no way to get a large fraction of men to be happy living as an underclass just because women are bad at choosing mates - at least not without force, and force would be resisted.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/23 12:09 AM
6

Reality exists, facts exist, some facts are not going to be pleasant and anodyne and maximally consistent with your preferences. Not everything is created in order to help you believe and do what you want to believe and do. Even if that's what OP wants, that doesn't make his position weaker - you still need to argue against it.
/r/BlackPillScience22/02/23 05:34 PM
5

I'm saying that "we need to focus on our group specifically, because we're the most affected" can sometimes make sense. "We need to focus on our group specifically, even though we're the least affected, also if you in the most affected group complain you're some kind of misogynist" doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:16 PM
9

Women in the West today are the safest group of people in history, period. You can evidently recognize that that destroys your argument, but instead of walking back you have nothing to respond with except "no u"? Is that how you think you can save face?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:11 PM
3

Literally everywhere in fiction you get lessons that boil down to "niceness, trust in others, not being tempted, playing by the rules, patience, meekness wins; selfishness, overconfidence, shallowness, following base instincts, caddishness loses". Often outright weakness and pacifism wins, by fiat. Literally everywhere you see conflicts between the following people: bad boy, good nice guy hero protagonist. Of course the bad boy is also secretly evil, any assertiveness is associated with sociopat…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 12:30 AM
6

She picked up the 70 IQ moral lesson, obvious if you're too dumb to pick up things like "insinuations" and "themes" - which is also the 140 IQ lesson, obvious if you truly understand mammal evolution: Women instigate fights between men and fuck the winner.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 12:15 AM
0

Most women intentionally seek men who will abuse them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 06:11 AM
1

It's true, but don't worry, brother, the future is bright.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:26 AM
1

You should be asking if it's hard to find just one woman that likes you more than the thousands of other marginally more attractive people similar to you who are available nearby. Chads are rare so they can be the best local option often enough, incels can't and have to get very lucky. A large fraction of men in history has never reproduced.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:10 AM
2

I don't think you realize - yes, these specific men are dogs. The other men are just bewildered to see women picking dogs to fuck instead of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 01:50 PM
2

Why can everyone else around them tell if someone is an asshole by first impression?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 01:45 PM
3

They do and it's obvious, that's why it seems that way. Most things are what they seem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 10:42 AM
3

Nah, they know, they're just lying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 01:15 PM
1

Men are less conformist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 08:09 PM
2

Very little. The different gender dynamics mostly come from the fact that a man can make babies much faster than once every 9 months and without effort, not from the threat of physical violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 11:24 AM

Imagine flipping these comments, actually being disgusted that lots of desperate women want to fuck you. I don't think it's even possible to comprehend that mindset. Women truly are the meme gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:54 PM
1

Please point me to the ones that don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 06:38 PM
4

You misidentify the problem. Women aren't consciously lying about it, they can't even admit it to themselves (as you see in this thread).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 06:27 AM
13

Lots of comments acting as if you asked completely different questions. I think the simple, correct answer is yes. It explains a lot, and for each of the things it explains, it fits better than most alternative explanations. It helps to remember the statistical differences between male and female homosexuality: insane orgiastic horndogs vs. dead bedrooms being the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 03:58 AM
1

Anytime anyone posts statistics I refute them with highly selected individual anectodes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 12:28 PM
1

In the bottom 10% you have actual sub-80 IQs and illiterates. Those aren't posting on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 12:26 PM
3

Firstly, I suggest reading a few posts from Retraction Watch. You have really, really high faith in scientific institutions working properly. Maybe in your field and in your place of work they do, but in general they don't. Most papers fail to replicate for totally predictable reasons. None of "working in multi-person teams, requiring ethical review, peer review before publication" are real checks and balances, they're political/social posturing. Science works fine without them. Most peer review…
/r/BlackPillScience28/08/21 09:46 AM
3

The bad science is the methods they used. Any conclusions they reach whatsoever are going to be garbage. In that respect, they're correct to hedge and avoid making any positive claims. The problem is that this sort of bullshit hedging is a common pattern in potentially "controversial" papers, and not in others. The actual quality of your data gathering, processing, any p-hacking that happened, etc. doesn't matter at all. When you have a result people will like, you just come out and say it: "Thi…
/r/BlackPillScience28/08/21 08:40 AM
0

Revenge is prosocial. You risk getting injured or punished, and in return society gets rules like "don't harm children" enforced, stochastically.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/21 06:09 AM

Fair enough. The internet has a lot of variation available. That aside, if you want to determine men's tastes, you'll look at the most popular pornstars. Personally, I think the "standard" ones look very samey, compared to a natural distribution of body types. I can imagine that for most people the whole "pornstar" subset lands at 9-10/10, but for me it's at best 6-7/10, as a matter of personal taste. It's probably true that it's 9-10 for the majority of men, but for all I know many others also …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 03:37 PM

No, I don't think people even like the fantasy. It's just that if you don't want to watch any incest whatsoever, that's 30% or so of the potential videos you can watch, gone. And if you don't like comically bad acting, that's another big fraction, and if you don't like the copypasted sequence of positions, etc. etc. In the end you would be left with nothing. As for why porn producers keep doing the incest thing, I have no earthly clue, but I refuse to believe there's any market research involved…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 03:09 PM

Are you sure that's true? What if only stuff you barely like is available? I think porn is extremely "off-distribution" in some ways. Consider all the fake incest, for example. If you use porn to judge, you might think a large fraction (or even a majority) of people like incest, which isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 02:47 PM

Where the fuck do you find those people? And so many of them that it becomes a consistent pattern?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 06:35 AM
4

people who think if they talk in a cerrtain way or spend enough hours on x then thats proof they are correct. That's not really the problem. The problem is correctness, i.e. a relation between the things you say and the state of the world, doesn't even come up in their trains of thought. Many people will think comforting ideas such as "you're exaggerating", "that's just STEM circlejerking", or "a lot of it is real science, you just disagree with the results", but please go read some actual paper…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:52 AM
0

Those are explanations, but are they excuses? No. I'm also going to judge people who don't bathe, but there's no "dirty acceptance movement" or "this one person got a burn and has to apply a cream that smells a little, therefore tolerate everyone who reeks of booze" or "uncleanliness is an addiction". This shitty narrative only exists because half of America is fat and in denial.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:16 AM
0

But... an accused is innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:59 PM
16

"I was colorblinded, but I'm okay. We should allow parents to colorblind their babies. What do you mean, I can't see as much as other people? From my perspective I see fine. Also, colorblindness prevents STDs in some African countries, and some people have a rare condition and need to be colorblinded, so we should do it from birth. It's purely cosmetic anyway."
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:50 PM
2

Yeah, that's obvious. The third wave doesn't seem to care about this at all, though, and I don't see any self-professed first-wave feminists around, or any activism except charity.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 10:29 AM
1

Translates to ~686000 rapes per year, or 0.4% of women. But it sure sounds high.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:42 PM
-1

happened/10
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter