TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

billjames1685 Archive

View 0 posts and 152 comments by billjames1685 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean, online you don’t have a chance to actually talk to people and display traits like confidence and humor, which are normally cited as incredibly important in attraction.
/r/BlackPillScience23/11/23 02:51 PM
1

Well I heavily, heavily caution trusting anything from these studies at all. I am a scientist myself, and different scientific fields have different general reliabilities. Coming from someone who works in a science that is often unreliable (machine learning). Social science about stuff like this are incredibly unreliable, especially as explanations for “inherent” human behavior; it’s essentially impossible to remove all conflating factors.
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/23 01:55 AM
3

“Look around all it takes is opening your eyes” Confirmation bias has taken another victim
/r/ExRedPill30/10/23 05:55 AM
7

Side rant but evolutionary psychology is such a bullshit concept. It’s not even a science, there isn’t anything remotely testable about 98% of the claims it makes, so idiots like Tate and Jordan Peterson can make a plausible sounding argument to support nearly anything.
/r/ExRedPill28/10/23 05:56 PM
1

This definitely is not true. Claims that it is “in their biology” are dubious at best (FYI evolutionary psychology is like the worst science in terms of reliability). The world is significantly more complicated than how you portray it; there are women into being dominatrixes and guys into being dominated, there’s people with feet fetishes, and so on. I know plenty of women who prefer when guys aren’t all macho masculine, because then they are less genuine. Of course the sample of girls I know co…
/r/ExRedPill27/09/23 01:28 PM
14

Lmao no there is a correct side. The left, although flawed, is significantly less so than the right. Just because there are two viewpoints doesn’t mean they are equal by default. That has never been the case in human history
/r/ExRedPill25/12/22 01:12 AM
19

Plenty wrong with right wing views lmao
/r/ExRedPill25/12/22 12:35 AM
7

Man you are a sad being I hope you get better
/r/ExRedPill12/12/22 03:33 PM
4

How about this: men with four limbs, men with three limbs, men with 2 limbs, and others
/r/ExRedPill07/09/22 06:48 PM
1

Wow y’all r an inspiration fr. I still kind of expect my life to be idealistic in that way, especially career wise, even though I try not to. I need to need that advice myself lmao
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 08:01 PM
3

Damn, sorry y’all have to deal with that but Im happy that y’all have that kind of love. It’s unfortunately rare.
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 07:44 PM
1

“Extremely unscientific words” yeah okay buddy somebody has no idea what science is. Continue being in denial if you want.
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 02:58 PM
1

No it’s not impossible to know, it’s unscientific to measure. I doubt you are a scientist because otherwise you would understand why. Asking people why they divorced is inviting bias; studies show that people tend to blame the other partner to avoid culpability regardless of gender. Furthermore, who initiated the divorce is not the same as who was in the wrong - women are more likely to initiate divorce, but that doesn’t mean they are more likely to be in the wrong. Here are the facts: sick wome…
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 02:40 PM
1

Yeah, and you ignored everything I said about that and how such a study is unscientific because it is bound to be biased. The data is pretty clear; you clearly think that sick women are divorcing their husbands when they get sick, which makes absolutely no sense. It’s so sad that you just refuse to apply your brain constructively. Oh well
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 02:11 PM
1

Yeah no this is complete bullshit. In america I’d say that men and women put up with roughly the same amount of nonsense, but elsewhere women put up with far, far, far more than men ever have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 02:11 PM
0

Yeah okay you don’t seem like you are going to listen or try to think about this objectively. You are pretty blatantly ignoring facts that don’t support your narrative, so I’m done here.
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 10:43 AM
3

Researchers don’t make it the focal point of their study because that would cause their study to be inaccurate. If you ask a divorced couple who ended the marriage, both of them are likely to say it was the other one to avoid culpability, regardless of who is right - especially and mainly in circumstances like this. Nobody is going to admit that they left their spouse because they got cancer. You seem to be dismissing the study because you disagree with “men are bad”. Thus you are fitting your f…
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 03:38 AM
1

Not sure if such research exists; nonetheless assuming a representative sample size (which is safe to assume because numerous studies have established this), it’s probably true that few people would willingly divorce their partner when they get sick. I mean, you got a cancer diagnosis and you react by ditching your partner, the most important person in your life? Given the weight of imbalance here, I think it’s fair to claim that men are the ones initiating the divorce.
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 03:17 AM
23

Yeah I’m not suggesting that it’s all men. I’m a guy and I don’t believe that all men are bad; im just saying that the notion that only men love “unconditionally” is silly.
/r/ExRedPill19/08/22 07:27 PM
15

Damn. Sorry you had to deal with that, that’s incredibly shitty of him
/r/ExRedPill19/08/22 06:42 PM
18

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091110105401.htm
/r/ExRedPill19/08/22 06:30 PM
153

Men leave women who become disabled/get a terrible disease/etc. at a far, far higher rate than women do. It’s bullshit.
/r/ExRedPill19/08/22 04:39 PM
0

Yeah. There aren’t that many jobs nowadays that women are literally to weak to do, and those few jobs that are will just be automated soon. So their argument, as usual, doesn’t hold.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 02:05 PM
1

It sucks that feminists treated you that way. I’d like to say that I’ve had similar experiences in a few feminist subs; there are people who actually care about mens rights. At the same time there are some feminists who are terrible people - one sub moderator allegedly told a male rape victim that he should be happy he was raped because men like that sort of thing. People on average are pretty shitty and most groups are going to have shitty people.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:38 PM
0

Feminism has also achieved some important things, like granting the right to vote to women and eventually affording them equal rights in the 60s. You are just getting angry at a strawman of feminism. It is not at all about hating men. I just wish people like you would stop being so close minded and actually think about things
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:34 PM
0

To be honest I can’t say that I looked into the details of the trial in great depth so I might be wrong, but I do believe that JD was found in recent documents to have planted some evidence on Heard. I’ll look into it more later if I get the time.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, you are right. Nonetheless my comment is true. Most feminists do not hate men. Some do, and they deserve to be called out.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:10 PM
2

That’s why I dislike subs like this. They accept it as axiomatic that one group of people is wrong and selectively choose the information present here so as to support that point of view, eventually making everyone more and more radical. It’s just frustrating to see
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:08 PM
2

Nope. You are conflating feminists with the minority who do hate men. I’ve already explained this in another comment
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:56 PM
2

I’m a guy by the way. And that’s your issue. You are conflating feminism with one radical sub. It’s like how people conflate mens rights with subs like the red pill/violent incels; it defeats any chance these movements have of being taken seriously just because there are some idiots who support it. There is no reason that mens rights and feminism should be in opposition; they are both based on some similar concepts, it’s just that both groups conflate the other with their most extreme advocates …
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:55 PM
-3

Yes by definition misandrists and misogynists lack the concept of equality. Incredible insight there! The sad thing is that you guys make some valid points, you just turn it on feminists when they are not your enemy. You form a hive mind and fuel each other into believing a distorted representation of the world, just as some of the extremely radical feminist groups do. I just wish people would think more
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:49 PM
-6

Oh this is absolutely beautiful irony. Most feminists do not hate men and don’t look for ways to destroy their lives. You have an insanely distorted view of feminism, fueled by stupid echo chambers like this sub. You also probably have a lack of understanding of nuance
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:43 PM
-4

You guys are just sad
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:40 PM
-3

They did abuse each other. You guys just ignore it because it goes against your bullshit agenda
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:38 PM
-1

Why the fuck are y’all so goddamn stupid?
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 03:37 PM
2

This my friend is what we call the placebo effect
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 12:43 PM
1

Because it’s the internet lmao? I can be here if I want. Y’all are stupid and I’m just calling that out.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 03:50 AM
1

Well yes, anyone who wants men dead is a terrible person; fortunately such people don’t make up the majority of feminists. And yes, men deal with a lot of shit. Our problems don’t get enough coverage. I absolutely agree with that. However, many feminists I know agree with these points, and our struggles don’t need to be in conflict with the struggles of women. They often aren’t.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 02:29 AM
0

Well you are clearly an anti-feminist; most people who subscribe to these views are probably just incels with no real life experience. Why the hell do you think the field is unfair towards men of all people? I mean that is just ridiculous. I say that as a guy lmao. Feminists have legitimate concerns and demeaning them is insane.
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 02:22 AM
-1

No they actually are, at least more so than y’all. Literally a bunch of people with no real life experience. Guarantee that if you get out and interact with real people you won’t be an anti-feminist lmao
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 01:57 AM
2

Oh yes absolutely. It’s always difficult to say until one reads the paper and sees exactly what the scientists are doing; but generally speaking, as you said, sensational claims like this one tend not to be very reliable. As you said there is too much noise in subject questionnaires and it’s very, very difficult to obtain a truly representative sample set because people are very much built by their environments.
/r/ExRedPill03/08/22 01:12 AM
-1

Think you mean found the person who is not completely out of touch of reality
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 01:05 AM
2

Just FYI psychology is one of the least credible fields of science. It has a half life of 5 years - half life is the period of time it takes for half of the science to be discredited - and more than 33% of papers are fundamentally flawed iirc.
/r/ExRedPill02/08/22 10:51 PM
1

You guys are genuinely insane I hope you get the help you need because this shit ain’t healthy
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 02:04 PM
5

What she means is that having sex makes it pretty hard to avoid attachment. It’s pretty difficult to be FWB and not have one of you develop feelings. TBH do whatever you want, as long as you are beign ethical (sex is 100% consensual).
/r/ExRedPill01/08/22 02:57 PM
7

The first part of this tells me that you have some insecurities you need to deal with. That’s totally fine, I do too and everyone does. You feel insecure that if you are vulnerable/don’t make your woman feel dainty or whatever then she will fall out of love with you. That is most definitely not the case necessarily. The truth is that this stuff is very complicated and difficult to explain through text. People fall out of love for many, many reasons - in general, monogamy for 60 odd years is not …
/r/ExRedPill29/07/22 05:02 AM
10

Yeah buddy I tell you this as a scientist myself, evolutionary psychology is not a very well established field. Psychology as a whole is not either - it’s half life (the time period it takes for half of the knowledge known before to be recognized as wrong) is 5 years. That means that in five years, we will recognize half of what we know about psychology now as wrong. I think 33% of all psychology papers are fundamentally flawed. A large part of the problem is that it’s so easy to doctor evidence…
/r/ExRedPill29/07/22 04:32 AM
12

It amazes me that y’all say shit like this. Where is it even coming from? I have an equal relationship in the way you describe. Most people I know who are in relationships have moderately equal relationships. You say shit like this because “trust you”, but I really don’t have any reason to trust that you and people like you are somehow infinitely knowledgeable in the psychology of women and people in general. You guys just don’t have a nuanced understanding of any of these subjects. Like yeah, b…
/r/ExRedPill29/07/22 03:54 AM
1

He most definitely will not. He has a ton of ridiculous opinions, I think he’s the guy who straight up said men can cheat but women can’t, and that’s going to turn off a lot of women. Red pill esque guys in general turn off a good number of women. I don’t think there is really anyone in the world who can attract everyone. I know girls who don’t find guys like Chris Evans attractive lmao
/r/ExRedPill26/07/22 06:33 PM
1

lmfaooo nice joke
/r/ExRedPill26/07/22 12:53 PM
6

Cult for people insecure in their masculinity to make themselves feel like they can get all the girls
/r/ExRedPill25/07/22 03:59 AM
9

👍
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 04:35 AM
11

Wow learning new words are we? If you knew what defeatist meant, you wouldn’t have used it, because it makes no sense given my response. Anyway I’m done here, hope you get out of this 👍
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 04:31 AM
12

Well, you are right. You are probably not an idiot. You are just choosing to be one. You are choosing to subscribe to a stupid belief system, despite the fact that you (like most humans) are probably reasonably intelligent. It’s a shame. My only hope is that you are a teenager or something. Much easier to look back at your time in the RP as a bad spell.
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 04:26 AM
24

Doesn’t change the truth of his claim. It isn’t an insult, it’s just a fact. Genuinely have no idea how people can honestly believe in the red pill, but cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 04:15 AM
6

The imaginary world y’all red pillers concoct has more lore and rules than the MCU. It’s pretty amazing, although also very sad.
/r/ExRedPill14/07/22 02:51 AM
-1

Wow you guys are fucking losers lmao
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 01:54 PM
3

Yeah like don’t put some girl you just met over your friends for years, but it’s fine to put a girl you have been in a long relationship with over them
/r/ExRedPill29/06/22 04:01 AM
4

Very good answer
/r/ExRedPill19/06/22 12:11 AM
1

Right man. Your gf is kneeling in front of you as you finish typing another Reddit comment.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 02:38 PM
1

I was arguing against some of the core tenets of the RP. So why do you think that because she is a woman she will leave when she finds something better? That is a massive generalization in and of itself. That’s the issue I have with y’all. It’s okay to say “this probably won’t last forever, because happy relationships rarely do, so I’ll enjoy it while it does and then move on”. It is misogynistic and inaccurate to say “she is a woman, so she will leave when she finds something “better”. Leads to…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 01:10 PM
1

I have tried providing stuff to these discussions. You guys are just locked into these beliefs, and you refuse to think logically. Good evidence is your post. You see a woman doing something shocking, and you conclude AWALT, instead of concluding the actual truth that people are just shitty on average. Men also do terrible, heartless things to their lovers, and in fact cheat slightly more often than women. Most people for that matter cheat. The red pill is just really stupid. Yeah, the blue pill…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 12:11 PM
0

You guys are so insanely stupid. You see one women do something like this and generalize that it’s all of them? Men also cheat to a large extent, which is also why women say the exact same thing about us (that we are incapable of love, will always cheat, etc.). God this sub is pathetic
/r/TheRedPill02/06/22 04:37 AM
8

Yeah it isn’t most women for sure. I’d say more men expect other men to adhere to these bullshit conventions than women do
/r/ExRedPill01/06/22 01:52 PM
12

I mean yeah there are a lot of women who will respect you less if you show any emotion. But do you really want to be in a relationship with such women? That isn’t even remotely healthy. My girlfriend has helped me to be more emotionally vulnerable and get rid of my fear of expressing my feelings. It definitely isn’t all women.
/r/ExRedPill01/06/22 01:18 PM
5

Dear god where do you get that statistic from? You guys just victimize yourself for no reason lmao
/r/ExRedPill11/05/22 07:11 PM
1

Well, most women and men cheat unfortunately. It isn’t as if the majority of people are faithful. People are just shitty
/r/ExRedPill09/05/22 05:30 PM
1

Men don’t suffer from feminism, but don’t act as if there aren’t problems that affect them. There’s no need to make this a contest. Women clearly suffer more on average, but that doesn’t invalidate the unique struggles men face. This is the issue I find with other feminists (I consider myself feminists). (Some) of them believe that bringing up men’s issues invalidate womens issues, which couldn’t be further from the truth.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 06:52 PM
1

I don’t think you read my comment entirely. I said the exact same thing about TRP. It’s misogynistic as fuck, so it obviously can’t address womens issues. In fact, it dismisses womens issues entirely, with some TRP members straight up advocating for rape. Anti-racism is a different issue, because white people don’t suffer in the same way men do in comparison to black people/women. I think it’s the best way for its message to be spread. Pretty much everyone would support feminism if it was framed…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 06:36 PM
1

That’s the issue. TRP can’t address female issues, because it is misogynistic as fuck. Feminism can address male issues, because it is more about ending the patriarchy (that affects men) than anything else. The fitness community does not address social issues men face. There isn’t an underlying philosophy the fitness community shares, other than just get more fit/etc. There are members of TRP that workout, after all.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 06:11 PM
1

They don’t deserve credit, it’s just that TRP is the largest subsection of thought that proposes them. I think mainstream ideas like feminism would do so much better if they addressed male issues as well.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 05:05 PM
1

Highly recommend journaling. Affordable alternative to therapy. Just write about all your thoughts and feelings, why you think women are goddesses, etc. Also, force yourself to talk to them more WITHOUT the intention of anything other than friendship. This can even mean just saying hi to a barista at a coffee shop or something.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 04:45 PM
3

You are misunderstanding the point; I made another comment about this. TRP does have useful advice. The issue is that it’s basic premise is objectively false, and the majority of its adherents are demonstrably just losers who blame women for their issues. It also contributes to the ongoing issue of men feeling unable to express their emotions (which is in turn a leading cause of men mental health issues), and has led to men raping women (I have seen a few stories on TRP sub where a man brags abo…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 04:38 PM
2

There are problems with mainstream discourse on male issues, which is why TRP, as one of the only spheres of thought that addresses male issues (however poorly) remains popular. That does not mean that TRP is accurate at all. It’s essentially a ridiculous doctrine based more on the insecurity of its adherents than any real world information. There are some useful tidbits of advice contained within TRP (ex: know your worth, live a great life outside the need for female validation, etc. Its just u…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/22 04:34 PM
2

What’s wrong with that? He’s allowed to look for sex if he wants to. As long as the way he obtains it is consensual it’s totally fine
/r/ExRedPill05/05/22 11:37 PM
1

This is a very valid point. Personally I am of the belief that the majority of documented differences in the social behaviors of the sexes is caused by cultural and social forces.
/r/ExRedPill03/05/22 03:06 AM
14

That genuinely is the answer. The main issue with red pill (and many, many ideologies in general) is that it’s adherents lack the ability to think critically and with nuance whatsoever. When they rightfully notice that the idea that soul mates exist and everyone is looking for inner beauty etc is not correct, they immediately gravitate to the other theory, TRP, which is even more incorrect and built on a load of misogyny. The “studies” backing TRP are mostly bullshit, as a large percentage of st…
/r/ExRedPill02/05/22 01:09 PM
11

The issue is you are just stupid
/r/ExRedPill02/05/22 12:52 PM
3

Dear god. I tried talking about this civilly, but it seems that you refuse to listen. You are invested in the conclusion that confidence doesn’t matter. For this reason, it is probably not worth my time trying to convince you otherwise, but I’ll give it one last shot. People sometimes DO construe those things as confidence. They shouldn’t, but they do. Either way, confidence and personality are definitely important for dating. As you said earlier, personality is crucial to maintain a relationshi…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/22 08:11 PM
3

Being well dressed, fit, etc. can be construed as confidence by some people. It shows that you present yourself well. You are once again not using correct logic. You are right, confidence is not necessary, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t help, or that it can’t make up for flaws in other areas. And it very much can.
/r/ExRedPill13/04/22 07:50 PM
4

Yeah, of course. Looks will always be the most noticeable for obvious reasons, but they are not sufficient by themselves (unless you look like a Greek god/goddess or something). Ultimately, it’s about how the other person makes you feel, which is a mix of looks, personality, and intangibles.
/r/ExRedPill13/04/22 07:25 PM
11

This is very not true lmfao. Confidence is a very attractive trait to a lot of people. Your logic is flawed here. Most people wouldn’t date an obese person regardless of personality, but that doesn’t mean that they only liked you because you were fit. They just wouldn’t like you if you weren’t fit. Looks can be an eliminator, but they aren’t the only factor.
/r/ExRedPill13/04/22 07:16 PM
1

Oh, then I don’t disagree with you about anything then LOL. My bad for misinterpreting what you said
/r/ExRedPill10/04/22 11:51 PM
2

i mean idk I feel like viewing men/people in general as a sum value of how nice, how much money, how attractive they are, etc. isn’t a good way of viewing potential romantic options. At the beginning of relationships, sure, because there’s no other way to rate people. But leaving a happy relationship for one that might be happier doesn’t sit right with me. First off, it’s a bad choice because it’s impossible to tell how you will sync with other people until you spend a LOT of time with them. Unf…
/r/ExRedPill10/04/22 11:08 PM
2

I don’t think anything (outside of being unsatisfied in their relationship/abuse/etc.) should make a reasonable person switch relationships. That’s what loyalty is. Switching from nice man without money to nice man with money is sad, and not indicative of an actual, genuine relationship.
/r/ExRedPill10/04/22 10:40 PM
6

If he’s far enough into that philosophy he will just come up with another rationalization for this. With that being said, OP shouldn’t have to put up with this behavior
/r/ExRedPill05/03/22 01:40 PM
1

Sure, I’ll dm you later today when I find the time
/r/TheRedPill30/10/21 11:04 PM
2

You can become a quality man without buying into this bullshit. I say this as someone who agrees with a lot of the life advice on this sub, like building a life worth living without women (not making them the focus of your life), etc. At the same time, the general premise about women is just straight up wrong. The conclusions drawn about gender dynamics here are largely informed by small sample sizes. But nobody here will consider what I’m saying, of course.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/21 04:47 PM
-19

As evidenced by your example
/r/TheRedPill30/10/21 04:42 AM
2

Is this true? I think humanity in general tends to create hierarchies and these lead to bullying, it has existed in literally every society with more than 30 ish people.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/21 07:10 PM
1

This 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 06:59 PM
1

Thanks, I will 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 08:10 PM
1

I brought up history of oppression after your comment. I never explicitly brought up white privilege, because I don’t agree with the concept all together. Anyway, goodbye. Enjoy living in your self made echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:27 PM
0

You did. You called me racist for referring to inner city Detroit the way I did. Then you said don’t say things about privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:22 PM
0

I didn’t call you a name. And thank you for ignoring everything else I said, instead calling me a racist. It’s clear to me by now that you refuse to have an honest discussion. I’m done here, have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:18 PM
0

Sorry for assuming your race, I just assumed you were white. My bad. Well, I think we can say that you, for example, have earned your wealth in the sense that you deserve it. However, there is no denying that luck was a factor in reaching there. Once again, my qualm is not with people like you. It is with the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:15 PM
1

You are right, I don’t know you. You might be a lot more successful than me. Nobody “earns their way” entirely. Like I said, hard work and perseverance are necessary to get where you claim to be, but luck is still a factor. And no, people are not 100% in charge of their destiny. That’s ludicrous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:11 PM
2

... this just shows how narrow minded you are. Do you really think that everyone at a similar level of success to you has the same mindset, the same worldview? No, if someone says something different they must be a disgusting poor person blaming great people like me . If you are unwilling to look past your cognitive dissonance for even one goddamn second then I am done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:06 PM
3

lmao I’ve already said that I am considerably successful. You just have this narrow minded view that anyone who admits that their success is based on luck is lying and must be jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 07:00 PM
0

Just FYI when I said family then I didn’t mean children. Many high schoolers have to take jobs to support their family, reducing the time they can spend on grades -> less chance of going to college if they can even afford it. Why do you think people born in Silicon Valley are significantly less likely to have children as a teenager than people in inner city Detroit? Do you think people in the former are just inherently better and make better choices, or is it that people are shaped by their envi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 06:57 PM
7

Right. Keep boosting your ego while ignoring the unfortunate truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 06:50 PM
0

No it isn’t. Most people in even a first world country would not be successful in tech, because typically only the most intelligent people get tech jobs. Even then, first world countries are hardly homogenous - you have a much better job getting a high paying tech job if you live in a wealthy Silicon Valley suburb than if you live in inner city Detroit, regardless of what your IQ is. The majority of people don’t even have time to put in 90 hour weeks given that they are supporting their family a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 06:21 PM
0

Your error is in assuming that luck cannot coexist with hard work. You think that your 90 hour weeks are the sole reason you are where you are. It played a factor, yes, but luck plays a major factor as well, mainly through genetics and environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 06:07 PM
5

It’s luck. Most everything in the world is luck. This coming from a guy who works in tech - I myself am incredibly lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 06:06 PM
1

Sort of. I think those girls get more attention, and women on dating apps are more shallow because they can’t discern personality from an app - so obviously they go for the best looks. Men do that too. But yeah, girls IRL value connection a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 02:20 PM
1

Yeah, I agree. I don’t agree with everything in the blue pill. But if you understood “female nature”, you would understand that not all of them want 6’5 Adonis figures. Plenty of women don’t want people who are way taller than them for obvious reasons, some women do. Most women I have seen want a man who is about 4-6 inches taller than them. Not many women want someone who is a full foot taller from my experience. Sorry for the toxicity in my original comment by the way, I’m a bit stressed at th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 01:37 PM
-1

I’m a guy so I don’t fucking know.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 01:32 PM
20

I think that women are essentially forced to become the mothers of their spouses - they take care of household chores, children, apppintments, emotional support, etc. as you pointed out. They are also tons of other minor things women are expected to do - for example, it is a semi common stereotype that a man who has, say, an uneven collar must be single or at least not living with a woman because a woman wouldn’t allow him to go out like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 04:52 AM
2

Buddy, here’s an opportunity to delete your comment and fuck off to spend a few years evaluating the life decisions that led you to become the shitty excuse for a human being you currently are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 06:43 PM
6

Nice one thanks 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 10:22 PM
23

lmfao y’all live in an alternate reality
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 03:59 PM
1

Those women dreaming of 6’5 men are exceptions, as you claim. Buddy stop acting like you are oppressed, once again it is not a woman’s job to find you attractive. My examples of men who are 5’2 getting girlfriends is to prove that it is not only possible but entirely feasible. 5’8 is quite average; the majority of men at that height (both statistically and anecdotally) will be perfectly fine in finding women. In fact, I know several men who are 5’8-ish who most women find more attractive than me…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 03:42 PM
0

Oh boohoo. I’m sorry you are so oppressed because you are one inch shorter than average. I’m 6’0, but I have seen several short guys with girlfriends who are taller than them. One of my friends is 5’2 and he has a girlfriend - in fact, he got a girlfriend before I did. That’s not to say that women aren’t attracted to height - a lot of them are - but not all of them are, and not all of them only want 6’5 people. In fact, most <5’5 women I have seen go for men who are around 5’8 because they find …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 03:13 PM
8

Really don’t bother. These people categorically refuse to listen to anything other than “woman bad haha”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 02:30 PM
1

Yeah, right. I used to be quite unattractive myself. What I didn’t do was sit there and blame women for having “high standards”, because I understood that absolutely no one in the world is obligated to be attracted to me. The majority of the things you stated are false. Most men would not go for a woman who’s a 2. You act as if women have unnatural standards for men, but it is men’s desire for insanely thin women (who somehow still have curves) that has caused epidemics of anorexia across the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 02:22 PM
2

No they aren’t. Women are allowed to be attracted to what they want. A woman is not obligated to find you attractive. “Women” is also not a monolithic group; there is quite a lot of variance amongst women. You more frequently see attractive women with unattractive men than the converse. If you guys actually spent time in the real world, you wouldn’t be sucked into these bullshit ideologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 01:26 PM
3

this is so facts
/r/ExRedPill29/04/21 01:59 PM
-4

Personal experience. Most men I know aren’t honest about other people’s shortcomings; it really just depends on culture. Where I live (I won’t say anything more than southern US), people of both genders tend to not call people out for being fat or anything. The distribution of people who did call people out seemed split equally by gender as well. When I used to stay in India during summers, people there were way more likely to call people out for being fat and stuff. I think it’s based a lot mor…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/21 09:50 PM
-10

And where do you get that information from?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/21 09:13 PM
-9

Again, you aren’t getting the point. “Men” is a very large group of people, many of whom will tell people it’s okay to be fat and many of whom won’t. Same thing with “women”. You can’t say “not all men” and then say shit like this. It’s just feeding into some bs ego about being a male.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/21 08:46 PM
1

At least you are self aware. Have a good one bro 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:48 AM
3

lmfao so you can’t provide any valid arguments. Figures. It’s sad how some people’s egos are so massive that they refuse to listen to anything that opposes their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:45 AM
4

lmfao bro do u read what u are saying? It’s almost like the women who live near drug dealing gangbangers are different from women who live near charity workers. “Women” is a very diverse group, just like “men”. Also, you haven’t proven that drug dealing gangbangers do better in the first place. Even if that were true, it doesn’t mean shit. Most people want someone who isn’t flat and one-dimensional - someone who is just nice all the time to the point of not being a human being anymore would get …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:41 AM
10

Right. And I’m sure you are basing this on actually asking women, instead of just the mechanations of your fragile ego? Like honestly dude, shut the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:33 AM
8

Yeah, it is incredibly wrong and based on nothing but bullshit. It seeks to fit women (and, in way, men) into incredibly narrow boxes of behavior that only define a small percentage of the population. The alpha male, for example, is based on absolutely 0 science whatsoever. Even in wolves “alpha males” aren’t really a thing (it has been disproven in recent years - there are alphas but they need not be male). Will it work? It might, but the women you attract would be shallow, toxic and wouldn’t h…
/r/ExRedPill24/04/21 12:54 AM
-1

Good for her mom. I hope she listens because you are nearing psychopath levels. Not out of place for this sub though
/r/askTRP23/04/21 11:32 PM
4

Yeah, clearly your physique means that you aren’t an incel. ik u aren’t going to listen, but get out of the red pill bs. it doesn’t help anything, it just cultivates an insane amount of insecurity.
/r/ExRedPill23/04/21 11:29 PM
1

Thanks for the substance-filled argument. Yeah, some of the things I say are the same as some of the things feminists say. White supremacists say some of the same things as your everyday conservative. Does that mean are all white supremacists?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 08:49 PM
1

Like I said, feminism isn't the root problem there - its society. I have definitely seen feminists interject on mens rights issues to point out that women have issues, and men do that when feminists bring up issues as well. I think we can both agree that oppression should not be a contest, and people who make it so are in the wrong. However, once again, just because a feminist does something doesn't mean that it is indicative of feminism as a whole. You provide no sources for that claim; your cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 08:47 PM
-2

This is bullshit. I love it when people blame issues such as men’s inability to express feelings without being shamed on feminists, rather than patriarchal gender norms that Western society has been built on for centuries. Most of men-specific issues (and women’s issues) are because of these gender norms. For example, discrepancies in the legal child custody system (if they exist - evidence is currently mixed) would exist because male judges think that women would be better natural caretakers, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 04:58 PM
2

Exactly. Although strength and hypertrophy work hand in hand, there will be differences in the results from those two training regimens.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 05:29 PM
4

I never said they were not strong, I just said they weren’t the strongest people on earth, which you seem to agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 04:54 PM
5

When the fuck did I say that? This is well documented stuff, do some research. I never said anything about fake muscle. The muscle they add is very real. And yes, it takes an immense amount of strength to bicep curl, say, 90lbs on one arm. The issue is that isolation exercises like that don’t carry over to real world movements as well as compound exercises do. That’s why bodybuilders can squat a shit ton of weight, but they can’t jump that high (even if they don’t weigh a lot - they might have m…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 04:36 PM
4

Fair. I never claimed that they were weaker than average, that would be ludicrous. Just that they aren’t necessarily the strongest people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 03:06 PM
6

They are strong as hell, but not as strong as their physiques might suggest. Bodybuilders emphasize physique above all else, and to maximize physique one typically aims for maximal hypertrophy. Hypertrophy and strength are related somewhat but not exactly the same. Further, the exercises that bodybuilders do tend to have little correlation with “real world movements”, which is what functional strength measures. “Real world movements” tend to require multiple muscles to work in tandem. Take bicep…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 02:23 PM
4

Yeah body builders don’t typically have high functional strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:22 PM
2

Fair enough. And yeah, that’s an issue on pretty much every social media site I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 04:48 PM
3

Yeah, that’s true, what’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 04:42 PM
8

Bullshit. Wealthy people tend to be vain, so it’s already a biased sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 04:00 PM
4

The world yall live in lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 04:34 PM
2

Bro the UK is part of the western world... Women who have high body counts are not sluts. That’s ridiculous. Your statement about men lying to themselves about being raped could be true, but you are relying on pure speculation in order to explain the gaps in the stats between the genders. I recognize that women do bad things. However, unlike red pillar, I don’t make claims such as “women inherently do bad things” or “women will cheat if you don’t prove you are an alpha”. I don’t think either gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 04:58 AM
3

The UK is not relevant? What the fuck? People lie to protect their egos??? What, so women tell some anonymous pollster that they were raped to protect their ego? “Women murder people’s reputations” that’s bullshit. Men “murder people’s reputations” at a similar rate - not by false accusations of rape, but through libel. Even then, a majority of women who are raped don’t make any sort of formal accusation, so the idea that they are out to get peoples reputations is silly. Additionally, the propor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 04:02 AM
4

That study was conducted in the UK. Yeah, they are self-reported. They are anonymous as well, so there is not much reason for a man to lie about not being harassed. Are you insinuating that sexual harassment victims should just let it go? I mean, you are right that female violence is less reported, but claiming that women commit violence at the same rate as men is ridiculous (except for suicide metrics which are similar). Vast majority of criminals are men, vast majority of rapists are men, vast…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 03:16 AM
3

Yes it is. 97% of women are harassed at some point in their life. The number isn’t nearly that high for men. This isn’t a hill you should die on. It’s extremely well known and established that men comprise a high percentage of violent people.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 02:48 AM
9

That’s because women are significantly less likely to harass the men just because they think are attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:57 AM
1

Shut the fuck up. Like honestly, you have no idea what you are talking about. I love it when red pillers act as if they know a single fucking thing about science.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:38 PM
1

Yeah no shit dating app stats aren’t indicative of reality. In a dating app, pretty much the only thing one can be attracted to is looks, wealth, job, etc. You can’t really tell someone’s personality unless you meet them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:19 AM
2

Women are diverse when it comes to sexual attraction. Like men, there tend to be certain types of people they are attracted to - but there is still nontrivial variance. Plenty of women like quiet nerds, plenty like fat dudes. Plenty like being dominant in the relationship/during sex, and there are plenty of men who like being submissive. 80/20 rule isn’t a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 12:22 AM
1

I know what a heuristic is lmfao AF/BB is bullshit. “Alpha” and “beta” don’t exist for humans, and “alpha male” doesn’t even exist for wolves either. There is absolutely 0 evidence for any of this shit, it’s just nonsense that insecure people make up to feel better about themselves. Yes, women find the vast majority of men unattractive. However, different women have different preferences, so there usually is a woman who will find any given guy attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 09:54 PM
5

No it isn’t. TRP claims that all women will cheat if you aren’t an “alpha”, genuine love is impossible, women are inherently manipulative These claims are demonstrably false. Women are complicated, diverse beings just like men. To be fair, a lot of “uggos” would stand a better chance if they were decent people. It isn’t by any means the whole equation. Some women do like shitty guys, no doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 09:33 PM
4

Nope. I’m not red or black pill, and I know that guys with shit personality get girls. Attraction is a much more complicated thing than any of the pills suggest, but the central premise of red pill is largely bullshit. It claims to know how women think, but the women it describes are generally the most shallow, insecure, and manipulative ones. Like men, women are a pretty diverse bunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 08:27 PM
-2

Nope. There is nothing logical about the red pill. People who fall for it are just idiots who overgeneralize every woman on the planet, essentially dehumanizing them. They are inherently stupid and incredibly hypocritical.
/r/MGTOW18/03/21 01:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter