| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Which country is fairest to men?I don't know the social dynamics in these countries, but at least in the West, gynocentrism was around long before feminism (I think they're really just two sides of the same coin) and that wasn't fantastic either really. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/26 09:36 PM |
| 1 | The Male Draft/Conscription is AndrocidalIf an 18 year old man was drafted against his will into a war that started before he had the opportunity to even vote, and he ended up dying, why would he care if the government was all women or all men? | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 10:01 AM |
| 3 | Yo why tf do they always do this?Based on responses when the situation is the other way, I assume they're perfectly prepared to hear something to the effect of either life's not fair, women need to help other women, or men aren't here to fix women's problems. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/26 02:59 AM |
| 4 | Genuine questionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s\_rights\_movement#Topics Far from perfect, but at least a start. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/26 12:45 AM |
| 0 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadDid you not read my comment? I explained my position completely. My entire position from the start has been you shouldn't pretend to know more about American politics than you really do. You're asking to also discuss a separate topic, abortion apparently, that I'm not particularly interested in discussing and that you changed your stance on, first making some insane claim about the death penalty and later moderating to some sort of anti-Trump tirade. I never broached either subject in the first … | /r/MensRights | 09/06/26 07:24 PM |
| 1 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadThat makes sense. I was hoping more for specific examples of derangement and misogyny. That's fine though, no big deal. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/26 01:34 PM |
| 0 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadNot super interested in that topic at the moment, but this is a major walk-back from your original comment. If an American were throwing around terms like Trump, republican judge, supreme court, Roe v Wade, state right, etc., that'd obviously be completely fine. But since you're not American, you don't have the context for such terms, nor is it likely that you even have a full understanding of them. Recognition of that fact up front would be the decent thing to do. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/26 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadYou're not American. Sure, you can know bits and bobs, but rarely do people really know much. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/26 02:42 AM |
| 2 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadWhy is a brit pretending to know about American politics. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 04:50 PM |
| 6 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadFantastic | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 03:56 PM |
| 7 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadPretty low bar but I'd say so. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 03:47 PM |
| 23 | Hot-take: I think that the Shift of male voters in the most recent US elections was not a net-positive reaction to the misandry, it validated the gender-wars insteadYou're obviously not American, so you may not have full context, but neither party is really in support of men. The one thing the Democrats frequently do though is actively vilify and blame men for problems they didn't cause. Rhetorically, Republicans are usually nicer, but it's not a guarantee. If you are in support of men, you have to look at individual issues across party lines. I'd be curious to see the "deranged," "misogynistic" examples of messaging you mentioned though. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 11:56 AM |
| 0 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?I think it's my first time here actually, but I certainly commend your goals. But if society told everyone it was the natural inclination of people born in odd years to mine coal by hand and of people born in even years to paint watercolors on the beach, and everyone swore up and down it was a great system, it would still be unfair to the miners and should be changed. If coal or watercolor production should decrease, so be it. Of course men and women switch between miners and painters given cont… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 10:54 AM |
| 1 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?I appreciate it lol. I was curious myself. Do you think many people are opposed to women working in and of itself? Clearly most have already been in the workforce for decades already. Personally, I won't rest until there's 50/50 representation from the boardrooms and the courtrooms to the trenches and the sewers, the front lines and the bread lines, and everywhere in between. But I'm more of a gender abolitionist, so I don't make many friends on reddit. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 09:50 AM |
| 3 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?US labor force participation rate for males 25-54 in 2024 was 89%, up from 88% in 2014. Projected to decline back to 88% by 2034. It was 78% for females in 2024, up from 74% in 2014. Projected to decline by 2034 as well, though negligibly. 26% of mothers don't work vs 7% of fathers, both relatively flat since 1990. Married, dual income, no kids arrangements grew 4% from 2013-2023. The marriage rate dropped from 59% in 1990 to 51% in 2023. The US population increases by 1.8 million per year. It's… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 09:11 AM |
| 2 | Why the hell should a guy nowadays consider marriage?Very true. Organization and advocacy. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 01:50 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter