TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bishopindict Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by bishopindict on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

IMO the book isn't amazing as far as educational volume goes, but it's a very entertaining listen, and the author is able to communicate his message in such a way that you'll most definitely remember most of it. I absolutely recommend the Audible version for the storytelling!
/r/TheRedPill06/02/17 10:41 PM
1

Read this. Cover to cover. TL;DR: If we want to crush Islamist influence in the west, we need to crush Iran. Feminism defends Islamism because they're both altruistic ideologies in opposition to western individualism. P.S. this is another nice, entertaining and related read, but not strictly required to understand the first book.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/17 02:29 PM
7

Influence by Caldini is better. Read it if you haven't.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 10:11 AM
3

The entire point of theism in general is to provide an objective moral framework for the peasants, and claiming to belong to any such religion without even trying to act in accordance with its moral standards is laughable. E.g. If you have decided to act in accordance with christianity OR just having accepted god you do not under any circumstance commit adultery. Another severe inconsistency is how she refused the have pre-marital sex with her boyfriend while she was out getting fucked. No versi…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 10:03 AM
1

This is not an instance of the Scotsman fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 09:22 AM
1

Mechanism was created first and it was custum to actually inform they jury during each trial, then politics happened. It makes sense to surpress this mechanism if you're trying to consolidate power into a particular branch of government.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:48 PM
9

Talking about it in the courtroom is illegal I think; doing it definitly isn't though. It's only been so for a few decades though, it was originally meant as a mechanism to keep power in check.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:45 AM
6

Juries (in the US) are also jurors of the actual law in question, so this would be unreasonable. E.g.: If I made a law that said all men are rapists, a jury could in todays system (and should be able to!) still vote not guilty vs. a male defendant. This is a mechanism to prevent centralization of power.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:02 AM
3

This is projection if I ever saw it.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 08:00 AM
1

OP: Amy Cuddy - Look her up if you want to know why this works.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 07:32 AM
13

I recently went from waking up at 12 every day to 05:30 and it's easy: the secret is bedtime discipline. Go to bed (That means you're underneath the fucking covers) exactly 8 hours before you need to wake up and you're golden. Also don't snooze.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/17 05:55 AM
1

That got lost on me. Thanks, mate!
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 07:24 AM
4

How is this in any way voted controversial? Have we been infiltrated by lard bags and mayo tubs?
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 05:34 AM
2

Once a person has betrayed your trust, you without exceptions stop trusting them.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/16 04:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter