TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bjv2001 Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by bjv2001 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Lmao nobody gets downvoted without having to tell themselves its a circlejerk. Move on m8
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:35 PM
2

Yeah I didn't really want to do it because I had be extremely generous towards all of his claims. The implications you point out I entirely agree with. Following what makes his comment so difficult to understand is that, he never elaborated on what exactly is the "BIG difference". I think he is more implying that men in this situation would enjoy it in more cases than women based off his personal claim that he would? I guess you can tie that as him saying its ok though. Regardless its fucked lol…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 05:37 AM
3

I mean I guess I can fully break it down if you're genuinely asking. >Even worse, it's saying that having a penis makes you a rapist no matter how attractive you are, >but a woman who is attractive cannot physically rape anyone. These are the two claims that you said were made in his comment (I think the parent comment you responded to mixed it up a bit as well but i'll stick to what you said to be consistent). The claims he made in his post were, and i'll add elaborations towards why they're du…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:57 AM
-6

Thats not what he’s saying at all? His argument is dumb as shit don’t get me wrong but you didn’t accurately represent anything he said.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:16 AM
2

you cannot fix stupid Way to be a class example.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:59 AM
1

Well, probably because you’re not the only person online who says dumb shit to argue with :) Sorry it was aggressive though, i’ll make sure I don’t hurt your feelings in other comments I make as well (since you seem interested enough to reply to them).
/r/MensRights06/07/20 02:33 AM
0

Remember its you who is choosing not to respond to anything and just make shit up. I’m quite content where i’m at. Also love how you’re point is basically “if you don’t agree with me and my opinion, don’t associate with this entire subreddit” You seem to be quite upset lmao, its ok typically MRA’s enjoy excluding people and don’t have arguments so you’re doing just fine! I’m glad you like to publicly inform people that you would rather exclude people than engage in actual discussion, seems like …
/r/MensRights05/07/20 09:27 PM
-1

What do you mean “the other extreme”??? You mean the vast majority? thats how you view the world. Thanks for informing me on my own beliefs that you have really demonstrated your knowledge of lmao. Lets get this straight, false accusations are a minority of the accusations, true allegations are the majority. How is siding with the majority an “extreme” now? You’re quote literally siding with the extreme here? Either we make allegations over social media and let the mob decide or we let all of th…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 09:17 PM
-1

So do we just ignore the massive benefit they have brought for the ability for them to cause harm? Get real. It was easily proven that M2K, a victim of false accusation, did not do such. At the cost of his perceived dignity, yes, but he has received overwhelming support as a result. So clearly that one didn’t ruin any career. I still don’t see what your point is, and it seems like you’re ignoring the benefit. These allegations have seen many benefits, and while i’m not even the biggest fan of it…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:46 PM
-3

Except none of the accusations ended careers that were not credible? Still not seeing your point.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:36 PM
-16

Yes there is? The top 3 people in 2016 are banned, with credible evidence. Notably Nairo and ZeRo this isn’t court of law its court of public opinion. Yeah, sure, he is innocent until proven guilty. But we don’t have to take a statement with confounding evidence to court to understand its probable validity. They pinned the list of all of the allegations. And everyone is well aware to just understand them as allegations, and generally wait for the response of the accused. That being said there ar…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:16 AM
-25

Thats not true at all! What?? Did you see the response to the ZeRo accusations? The attacks people made to Jisu calling it a “weak” accusation among a host of over things. Just because you have 1 example doesn’t mean that you’re right. Thats being said, ZeRo was absolutely in the wrong. And the amount of people still defending him is disgusting. People here seem to forget that a majority of these accusations are true, and that these accusations have already provided a lot of benefit to banning g…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:36 AM
-4

Because they didn’t. There are just very loud minorities that didn’t. Its not revisionism, its a lot of people misunderstanding. Of course feminists who fought for the equality of females in society will be most vocal about female issues. That doesn’t mean their movement doesn’t fight for equality in other places. That also doesn’t mean there will be those in the movement who are quite extreme in their beliefs, look at TERFs for example.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:53 PM
1

Everything up until when she conflated lack of belief with disbelief was correct. When somebody makes a claim, they have the burden of proof to demonstrate its validity, not the audience. Demonstrating a lack of belief in the face of little evidence is siding with the de-facto “innocent” not “not-guilty”. One also doesn’t have to side with the claim the moment it was produced by the accuser to desire it to be investigated fully. That being said one should always handle serious accusations seriou…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 08:39 AM
1

every single country has a different mindset iglesia you don’t know them all then don’t pretend to know them. I feel like you lack proper grammar here, but aside from that I don’t know what this means at all and towards the end it just looks like you repeat what I said but with no point? Also its rather odd to me that you’re willing to admit that every country has a different “mindset” and in the same comment you generalize an entire group of people that are associated by their sexuality and mak…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 02:47 PM
1

You don't see how their attitudes to social issues are affecting the mainstream? Even they're now turning into SJWs, for starters. I feel like you're being intentionally broad when you use the term "mainstream" here. Do you not want to actually take a stance on something you feel is being changed? What I see being changed is that the progressive stance on social issues has finally started to address massive systemic problems when it comes to discrimination in America. If it comes at the expense …
/r/MensRights25/06/20 04:16 AM
0

I don’t think you’re properly describing the progressive left versus the progressive rhetoric being used corporations. For one, being a progressive when it comes to the left is often both economic, and social. What exactly are the progressive democrats influencing when it comes to the “mainstream corporate side” and how is it bad? Also what do you even mean by “mainstream corporate side”? Also it really seems like you don’t understand American voter demographics because when it comes to democrat…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 03:26 AM
0

The democratic party is “extreme” in being moderate, how in the world are they getting more extreme? The progressive side of the democratic party makes up a small fraction of the total so I have no idea what you’re talking about. Nobody thinks the entire right is racist. That doesn’t excuse the fact that the republican party members consistently enact legislation that disproportionately affects black americans. Further the strong christian supporters on the right are often homophobic as well as …
/r/MensRights25/06/20 01:59 AM
1

If you don’t care about their politics then don’t pretend like you know them. The right wing across the world is much different than the american right. Known for their racism, sexism, and homophobia. Its not even an sjw thing, its just true.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 01:44 AM
-5

Everything you said addresses absolutely nothing towards what the person your responding to said. In the case of the american right wing the embrace of racism and homophobia, both by its following and elected officials, is undoubtedly present and growing. Edit: also like that you included homophobia in your response after it wasn’t even implicitly mentioned. Almost as if you knew that the right wing party is well known for its homophobia 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights24/06/20 07:49 PM
-1

No it doesn’t Its not “biased” It literally is just calling attention to something rarely ever called to attention. No false impression is created at all.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:11 PM
0

Kk Also you didn’t address the question, yawn.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 06:30 PM
0

When does stating “your point is shit” count as an argument? I don’t provide the argument when I provide a claim first, you’re supposed to “argue” against it dipshit.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 05:23 PM
-17

Second person to still provide no actual argument, thanks for the ad hom tho. Only the feelings here boys.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 08:38 AM
-28

Haha retard, funny word haha. Cool argument as well.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:47 AM
-34

Woah my dude you don’t need to make up a bunch of shit to disagree with someone. Edit: Downvote, call people retard, leave. Still the r/MR experience. Everyone just assumes I’m not on their side and get so butthurt. sorry you had to hear something you didn’t like in your wind tunnel today
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:23 AM
2

No actually you’re wrong unfortunately. I would love to agree with you, although i’ll be fair and agree I definitely haven’t heard kill all men. People have word for word responded to me with “I don’t give a fuck about women or their issues” “fuck women and their “rights””, and thats a list of 2 of many examples. Its unfortunate but he’s not incorrect. There is a fair amount of shaming and putting down women that goes around unchecked on here and it is definitely due to this kind of circlejerk. …
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:08 AM
1

Again we’re going to have to agree to disagree on sources. And I have read through yours. Its not “the gold standard” solely because it addresses men in a more cohesive way. I understand what your talking about when it comes to how rape is classified but if you didn’t read through the studies I showed you most of them discuss the exact problem yours discusses. The definition of rape is inconsistent and it causes discrepancies. Not all studies fail to address how made to penetrate is defined. alt…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 07:37 PM
-3

No its not.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 08:04 AM
1

Women do have a highly disproportionate chance of being raped / experiencing sexual violence. Source(s): (I have to say I have yet to do a full read through of the third listed one, but its information from a reliable organization) https://ovc.ncjrs.gov/ncvrw2018/info_flyers/fact_sheets/2018NCVRW_SexualViolence_508_QC.pdf https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications_nsvrc_factsheet_media-packet_statistics-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-viole…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:35 AM
1

Do you not think that there are many feminists that say the exact same thing as you but reverse? That they don’t think there isn’t less coverage, they KNOW there is? What makes them any more correct than you? And how would you even go about measuring these things? And i’m sorry but it was you that arbitrarily picked two very separate issues that either side takes problems with. Thats like saying you’re choosing to put the issue such as women having a highly disproportionate chance of being raped…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 02:41 AM
2

Wow, and here I was just expecting to take my downvotes and leave. And i’m glad that you’ve set an example that being wrong isn’t a bad thing. I’m sure there is plenty of things that I hold true that may be wrong, but that doesn’t mean that I’m ok with admitting that they were when I find out. You hit the nail on the head, this is a really minuscule problem if it is one at all. My goal here wasn’t to show you were wrong, but to try and convey that individual interpretation of things is prone to …
/r/MensRights05/04/20 02:06 AM
2

I hate to be pedantic with you but a book or electronic resource that lists the words of a language (typically in alphabetical order) and gives their meaning, or gives the equivalent words in a different language, often also providing information about pronunciation, origin, and usage. The dictionary definition of dictionary states specifically they’re meant to also provide information about origin and usage. Which is, in my opinion, the point I was trying to get across. It’s similarly why the d…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:50 AM
2

Good question. Rephrasing my response to try and argue something I didn’t give an opinion on is doing a really good job at trying to convey your point that’s irrelevant towards this discussion.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:37 AM
1

Maybe you feel like there is a gigantic disproportion of coverage. And maybe thats true. But thats not what he was saying Why do you think that my criticism of his words renders me unable to feel that men also face blatant sexism in this world? I’m disgusted by all sexism, and despite acknowledging that men absolutely do face systematic sexism I also know that women do face countless more examples of sexism. That isn’t at all to say that any sexism faced by men is devalued by this. At all. I was…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:35 AM
1

Thanks for responding as I’m genuinely interested in trying to see where you come from. That being said, it seems like you’ve just ignored my point? For the first part, you stated in a different comment 1) it doesn’t aide with helping understand the word, its just a random jab for seemingly no reason. Thats why I started off with saying I don’t think its a snipe at men, because from what it seems from that comment you think it is. My goal from my comment was to try and explain that the informati…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:26 AM
2

So you haven’t only not proven me wrong. But you also fit exactly the conditions that I warned someone who has been filtering this information in their minds non stop may become. You just laundry listing examples of sexism that men face doesn’t disprove anything. Or counter what I said. And, I'll say this - I don't give a FUCK about women, or their fucking rights. Women have advocacy groups, politicians, academics, lawmakers, almost all of fucking society looking out for their fucking interests.…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:05 AM
3

I don’t think this is a particular snipe at men. Hear me out. Sexism as a term came from second wave feminist movements in the 60’s to describe the conditions they faced and the disproportionate inequality women faced at the time. This never really stopped being the case as to the usage of the word. Although, despite its origins it has of course been expanded to men, and most rational people won’t argue that men can’t experience sexism. That being said, because of its origin and literal definiti…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:54 AM
2

They are both extremely similar words? What does it matter that it changed in recent years?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:35 AM
1

Do you guys really upvote this? Do you honestly not realize how saying things like this creates a wind tunnel? You say: its clearly incorrect And your justification is: I’ve seen a shitload more sexism against men than I’ve ever seen men being sexist This, in itself, is nothing more then anecdotal evidence. Who cares what you’ve seen? I’ve personally seen some very horrific things happen/almost happen to women by men. And i’m not going to spout that as evidence to say that clearly this is correc…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:31 AM
3

Read his explanation of this, he literally explains this for someone pointing this out
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:34 AM
1

No he is just logically countering a claim that generalized the other side. Are we all just supposed to be a mindless wind tunnel?
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:21 PM
8

Your last sentence has absolutely nothing to do with what he had to say. He was trying to say that the system is clearly biased and that in today’s society the ability to just switch genders and instantly be accepted is something that he was pointing out as a joke. Its called humor, lighten up, he didn’t delegitimize anything or anyone
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:51 PM
11

Or maybe just putting wayyyyy to little trust in her relationship and controlling him like a puppetmaster
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter